HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-1318-00-031 .Y ®moo.®�.w.,m,.,,......,..
Wisconsin Department ofcommer @IL EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3
Division of Safety and Buildings
in accordance th Comm 8 ,Wis. Adm. Code
\"qqv.. County ST.CROIX
Attach complete site plan on pa not les3than 8'1/2 x 11'inche3 ntsizg„Plan must
include,but not limited to:vertical nd horizontal reference point(BM ,d��ectiottand Paroel I.D. v�
nt slope, ,north-Arr t and dis ante to, a est road. w v
P erce P ,scale or dimension � �� Re ewed b Date
Please rint a7/D►i#Yr - ///� -�� � /
purposes(Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)(m)). CWw� i 7 Db
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary pure ( Y
Property Owner Property Location � ■
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY C/O Leo Beskar Govt.Lot ----NE 1/4 NW 1/4 S 11 T 28 N R 19 E(or)W
Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot# r1u:;Na e or CSM#
Hills of Troy
Rodli,Beskar,Boles,&Krueger SC,219 N.Main Street N31i village own Nearest Road
city State Zip Code Phone Number ❑ g C.T.H.U
River Falls, WI 54022 ( 715) 425-7281
4 600 GPD
New Construction Zo esidenti al/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate Replacement ublic or commeraal-Describe: ft loess over till Flood Plain elevation if applicable T.r e Parent material loe General comments I Dund System--0.92 ft.sand fill--0.6 loading rate
and o�mmeda ns: �{ P�.OUGt� !t'� f
�i e I'd kl o4tS 9 (If pre-treatment-below ground drip irrigation system-0.8 loading rate)
I ,
ie
Boring 25
ql___J Boring# in' Soil lication Rate
�____� Q Pit Ground surface efev 1084.32 ft. Depth to limiting factor
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Des Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots *EfX01 *Eff#2
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz Sh,
1 0-9 10YR3/3 sl 2fgr&sbk mvfr as 2vf-m 0.6 1.0
mfr cw lvf-m 0.6 1.0
_ 2fsbk
2 9-20 10YR3/6 sl 0.4 0.7
Sa 3 20-25 10YR4/6 '� 0 1 sl lfsbk mfi cw --
10YR4/6 fLd 10YR5/6 sl Om
mfi __ -- 0.2 0.6
4 25-27
I'l 0+'t h I S dVV✓n v�N !b p
B Boring# Boring 10 .39 �"""
ElPit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil A lication Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Get Sz Sh. Consistence Boundary Roots *Eff#1 *Eff#2
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color
1 0-5
10Y3/2 { I 1 2f-msbk mfr as 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 5-10 io I 2f-mssbk mfr as 2vf-m 0.6 0.8
3 10-18 10YR3/4 0
1 2fabk mfr cs 2vf-f 0.6 0.8
4 18-25 10YR4/6
(,6((ti -- 1 2fabk cs lvf-f 0.6 0.8
5 25-3.0 10YR5/6
el
2fabk deh as -- 0.4 0.6
till (�� y,t76
*Effluent#2=BOD <30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L
*Effluent#1 =BODS>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30:S 150 mg/L CST Number
CST Name (Please Print) Signatu
224832
Mary Jo Hollister Telephone Number
Date Evaluation Conducted P
Address 715 426- 1775
W9875 690th Avenue, River Falls, WI 54022 05-31 &09- 10-05 ( ^T^ ^ ^ ^^n
Property Owner
NDSU(Lot N31) Parcel ID# (Pending) Page 2 of 3
Boring# Boring 10°3.07 25
Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor Soil A lication Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots *E�GPD/fPEf(#2
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh.
1 0-9 10YR2/2 1 2fa&sbk mvfr as 2vf-m 0.6 0.8
2 9-25 10YR3/4 c k rT� sil 2fabk mfr as lvf-m 0.6 0.8
0.0
3 25-29 10YR5/8 f1f 10YR4/6 c
1 fa&sbk mfi -- -- 0.0
Horizon 2&3 boundary has some gr; 1! I j�t
40YR7/3 fs @ backside of pit. 2 0�' � Q �' S�e
Boring
E-1 B°ring# Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. --go—ilApplication Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots *Eff#1 *Eff#2
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh.
0 Boring# Boring Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor m. Soil lication Rate
Pit
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots *EGPD/f�Eff#2
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh.
*Effluent#1 =BOD5>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30<150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BOD,<30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
SBD-8330Te t(R.07/00)
. Plot..flan for Hills of Troy Page 3 of 3
Town of Troy, St Croix county, Wisconsin
Lvl -51 1" _ ¢0 f t
Legal Description NE 2ft. contours
V,,_Wv 1-004) t)F_ ; y = Backhoe pat
N 1, 4 CORNER
SECTION 11
T28N, R 19W
BENCH MARK: /�Gi w /�'j(lLtih
TOP OF 1 1/4" o l/
IRON PIPE
r
ELEVATION = ID�4.b�' (•� � �� �' ��. ",,� 5.., ,c:. �,,. � ;�_;; �
C Slid SE _ S e .t� BENCH MARK:
d OF 1 1/4
IRON PIPE
EVATION =
I / a
l 3
�(rvu�i
dv�� , 083. 3
m
1
p
—94B
i
R-94 A'o
; )84. 6
n"r CROIX COUNTY
PLANNING & ZONING
January 19, 2006
Mr. Craig Lilja
c/o Troy Development
11806 Aberdeen Street, Suite 290'
Blaine, MN 55449
RE: Hills of Troy Soil Evaluation Reports Review
Code
Administration SE/NW Section 11, T28N, RI 9W Town of Troy
715-386-4680
Land Information Dear Mr. Lilja:
Planning I have completed a review of soil evaluation reports submitted to our office for Lots 1 —62
715-386-4 on the above-referenced development and find that additional information will be required
for 18 of the reports. The following summary provides specific data that will be necessary
Real perty before these reports can be used to design mound private on-site wastewater treatment
7 386-4677 systems (POWTS):
R cling Lot 1 —The soil application rate that must be used to calculate mound basal area (0.2
386-4675 gpd/ftz) requires a long, narrow mound with a linear loading rate of<4.5 gal./ft./day. The
existing tested area allows a maximum mound length of 90 feet, which is likely too short to
meet the linear loading rate requirement. In addition, the elevation reported for boring R-1A
is incorrect and must be re-measured to provide an accurate contour elevation for mound
design.
Lot 4—the entire original soil-tested area was covered during excavation and grading of the
building pad. From an on-site investigation made 1/17/06, 1 observed that a crescent-
shaped area of undisturbed soils remains between the toe of the filled building pad and the
20% slopes at the rear of the lot. According to Ms. Hollister, there is another boring (R 4E)
that was not included in her submittal, but is located in this undisturbed area. She needs to
submit an amended soil evaluation report that includes a profile description and shows the
location of this boring so that a contour can be established for a mound. In addition, both
benchmark elevations need to be checked and verified, since the elevations are 0.91' and
2.05' higher than the contour 1066' shown on the plot plan. The amended report must be
completed before a design can be created for a proposed POWTS. Please note, Ms.
Hollister is a CST, but not a POWTS designer, so plot plan and mound plan view
calculations she has prepared, indicating a location for a 33' x 124' mound, are o an
example of what might work after the soil data has been provided.
Lots 10 & 11 — I made a note regarding inconsistencies for BM @ 1077.15, which is shown
in different locations on each plot plan. I recommended using the alternate lot corner I. P.
benchmark @ 1075.10' to avoid errors in establishing mound contour elevations.
Lots 1 XR'K' 910, 11, 14 17, 1&22 24, 25, 31, 32, 34, 40, 41, 45, 46 &62 - On all the
above o , there are discrep ies een the elevations and test pit locations compared
to the contours shown on Ms. Hollister's site plans. In a telephone discussion with CST
ST.CRO/X COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
110 1 CARM/CHAEL ROAD,HUDSON, Wi 54016 715-3864686 Fs�Y
PZ @CO.SAINT-CRO/X.W1.US W W W. .SAINT
i
Page Tw i s'o` "roy of epor
Mary Jo ollister, I was informed that most of the elevations reported for soil test pits were provided by the
surveyor art of developing the preliminary plat. The individual soil report plot plans were created using
copies of th liminary plat to show 2' contour intervals on the lot and locations of Mary Jo's test pits.
When usin n Sea Level elevation (as opposed to an assumed elevation), the contours should be
consistent he elevations given for each test pit on the plot plan. Some of the discrepancies may be a
result of c largement and scale that are not 100% accurate. However, my concern are errors that
range from to more than 6 feet difference in elevation, which is unacceptable. All reports that have
discrepancie reater than 0.75' will be set aside and copies mailed to Mary Jo for re-calculation and/or
corrections b re the reports will be released for use in designing POWTS.
Our office, as a `governmental unit"for the state, is required by WI Comm 85.50 to complete soil report
reviews withi months of receipt; these reports were submitted on 10/25/05. Please feel free to contact
me if you a questions regarding the soil report review or status of individual lot reports.
Sinc y,
meta Quinn
g Specialist
Cc: L 'e Filkins, Ogden Engineering
Jo Hollister, CST, Hollister Soil Testing
an Wert, Town of Troy Building Inspector
bdivision file
ST.CRO/X COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 101 CARMICHAEL ROAD,HUDSON, W/ 54016 71 X386,4686 FAX
PZ @CO.SA/NTCRO/KW/.US WWW.CO.SAINT-CROIX WI U