HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-2066-95-000(3) �1SLt�l\l11\.girl �.' yN ;
D�CI��,O�:TREND•ANA>L,'YSXS
Data CoIu tloii/AnalysisWould Ltelude:
Initial Data
Computer/property I.D. #
Owner's Nar'ne
Property Address
'Zoning District A2 AG AR RES COM IND
Past Zoning A2 AG AR RES COM : IND
Overlay District NONE MORELAND WETLAND FLOODPLAIN RIVERWAY
Location -- Section, Town, Range, Lo S-w3 C a
Acres
Request Data SZ
Disposition DENIED APPROVED WITHDRAWN POSTPONED Date
Activity
7 Wvu y- -2- 3.5'
Rezonin / Variance / eeial Exception
Type of Variance/Special Exception
ROAD/HWY, SETBACK WATER SETBAC BLUFFLINE SETBACK L T RATIO
DRIVEWAY SEPARATION NONCONFORMING LOT SIZE
Ordinance Citation � • 3 C C/,�
Supporting Evidence Description 41-e-1
PLOT MAP/PL SITE PLAN TOWN APPROVAL LTR C �PHOT S MAPS OIL TEST
Hardship OYES `
NO
Linked to Rezoning YES
Conditions
v
EXPIRATION DATE COMPLETION ACCORDING TO PLAN ALL PERMITS COMPLETE
ZONING OFFICE ACCESS 8c NCS' k'ICATION UPON COMPLETION EROSION CONTROL
Objections YES NO
i
O
N
N
O I
O
w
LO
00 @° C �
N
•O C
@ ) c E
L.
E o m
O m m ° @ a
p N O@ Q C
G Y O N@ -•
C O
r C w N >� C
@ c (N @ p
C O)OY -@O p 0 °
C C O) C > t•
O O
-0 O Lc, N i
U) @(N6 rt0„ 0 ll C O O
'p Z '= c Y)o)o t a
C '00 C @
LL c ( Q) a N
N C
N
O N
- o.
c
C - >
O wp O.(L � „ L
N T L U N C - 2
E Q � �' � w > E3@
I
U
@ M
C.
N
N J •� O I
Z _. 6
° o a m
LO C)C C7
O Z d
U `� N
a) z c
E
v
Y
C
N @ h C C)
~ N O
•My 07 s cV U N
2 Z Z °
d Z
c O
_ I
£ @
O @ p
a
C •� w
U) c O d
E = CL V)
w. O O O
•N @ m a m
LO►`� a N I
° N LO N
to U rn rn a)Q
3
@ N
O .. 4•j N N N
I Z co O V, E � ,n �-
N
Lo
cu
J O LL O C N C Q 0 O
U') C°) H co N C ' 0 00 0 0
C� O
CU
[ O O NO @ N -0 Z O In
-� N ;J C O
Cl) Ui yam' ° M in Y ° ° Z
a
a* a a w
CL 7E; .0 N w C
i C C 7
r1 A U a E O N v
Parcel #: 030-2066-95-000 03/31/20P AGE E 1 PM
P 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel M 35.30.20.609E.609F 030-TOWN OF SAINT JOSEPH
Current OX ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
O-FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
333 W WACKER DR STE 2500
CHICAGO IL 60606
Property Address(es): "=Primary
*185 RIVERVIEW ACRS RD
Districts: SC=School SP=Special
Type Dist# Description
SC 2611 SCH DIST OF HUDSON
SP 1700 WITC Notes:
Legal Description: Acres: 1.930
SEC 35 T30N R20W PT GL 4 COM 395 FT N&
743.4 FT W OF SE COR SEC 35:TH W 256.3 Parcel History:
FT S 329 FT, E 256.3 FT TH N 329 FT TO Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
POB 01/06/2014 991046 PR
10/25/2007 862956
05/17/1974 321936 511/169 WD
Plat: '=Primary Tract: (S-T-R 40%16o%) Block/Condo Bldg:
*N/A-NOT AVAILABLE 35-30N-20W
2014 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
0
Valuations: Last Changed: 05/11/2011
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 1.930 284,200 266,300 550,500 NO
Totals for 2014:
General Property 1.930 284,200 266,300 550,5000
Woodland 0.000 0
Totals for 2013:
General Property 1.930 284,200 266,300 550,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 1 Certification Date: 10/06/2005 Batch M 05-29
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
- 2 _
Mrs. Banning had no rebuttal.
Mr. Richard Stout presented his request to fill and grade a road that will enter
a new minor subdivision which he is proposing. Mr. Al Nyhagen, land surveyor,
showed the board drawings of the road construction.
Zoning Administrator read letters from Land Conservation Department and D.N.R.
Chairman Stephens read letters into the record.
Steven Muza, attorney, presented the objections of the Stout request for Mr. and
Mrs. Ron Gorke, talking about future easements. He feels that this could be a tres-
pass, not an easement. Mr. Ron Gorke presented his objections to the Stout request
with an overhead slide presentation.
Mr. Thomas Huninghake presented his objections to the Stout request. Stakes for
the road were on the property in question.
Steven Muza stated that the photos were taken by Mr. Gorke.
Richard Stout rebutted the objections of Gorke and Huninghake stating that he would
have sold the property to the Gorke's and Huninghake. Al Nyhagen showed the board
field notes on 5-3-84 and 6-28-84, walking over the proposed subdivision. He also
staked the road within the right of way. Mr. Muza asked a question of Al Nyhagen
as to whether or not he had talked to the Gorkes.
Mr. Nolan Anderson presented his request to construct a house that would be within
the area of the house that burned. The setback would be 80 feet from a town road.
Hearing recessed to inspect the properties in question.
Board returned to session to render decisions.
1. Joan Kennedy: Motion by Supervisor Meinke to approve the Joan Kennedy re-
quest when proof of bond is received from St. Joseph Township, and as long as the
holding tank meets all state requirements and extensions of driveway sidewalls
are built to D.N.R specifications. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried.
Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes.
2. Ralph Weggel: Motion by Supervisor Meinke to approve the dock as it meets
the Corps of Engineers approval and the dock shall be removed annually before the river
freezes over. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to approve:
Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes.
Arnold Beihoffer: Motion by Supervisor Kelly to grant approval of a 110 foot
setback from CTH "C" and a 30 foot setback from the north property line, as this is
the only way to utilize the lot. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried.
Vote to approve: Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes.
4. Peter Banning: Motion by Supervisor Kelly to approve the lift with the con-
dition that the least amount of trees be removed and the stairway shall be removed
upon completion of the lift. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried.
Vote to approve: Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes.
5. Richard Stout: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to approve the road in it's
present configuration and meets all specs of the county and D.N.R. with the excep-
tion of the blacktop. The road, properly installed, will not cause any significant
harm to the adjoining property. Moving the road to the center of the easement
will cause unnecessary harm to the Huninghake property. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly.
Motion carried. Vote to approve: Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes.
6. Nolan Anderson: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to table this request until
more information is received on percolation test, type and location of a sewer system.
In the event the approval by the Zoning Administrator, and present location of the
house stakes are not over the present sanitary system. MT. Anderson to bring the
above information to the May Board of Adjustment hearings. Seconded by Supervisor
Kelly. Motion carried.
Inspection of the Richard Thompson property shows that Mr. Thompson has done nothing to
correct the violation of the bluffline.
Motion by Supervisor Kelly to adjourn. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried.
Hearings adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
vK:HS:mj Vernon Kelly, Secr&tary
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARINGS
April 30, 1985
9:00 - 2:30 p.m.
Meeting called to order by Chairman Stephens at 9:00 a.m. in the County Board
Room, Courthouse, Hudson, Wisconsin. All members present.
Minutes of the March 26 and April 19 hearings approved.
Hearing called to order by Chairman Stephens, setting the guidelines for the hearings.
1. ARTICLE: 3.12 E (c)(8), St. Croix Riverway District
APPELLANT: Arthur Partridge
LOCATION: Gov't. Lot 3, T28N-R20W,
Town of Troy
2. ARTICLE: 6.3 C(1)(c), Holding Tank
APPELLANT: Joan Kennedy
LOCATION: Gov't. Lot 4, Section 35,
T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph
3. ARTICLE: 3.12 5.8, Dock in Riverway District
APPELLANT: Ralph W. Weggel
LOCATION: Gov't. Lot 4, Section 35,
T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph
NEW BUSINESS
1. ARTICLE: 3.12 CG, Lift in Riverway District
APPELLANT: Peter Banning.
LOCATION: Gov't. Lot 5, Section 27,
T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph
2. ARTICLE: 3.4 B(1), Filling and Grading
APPELLANT: Richard Stout
LOCATION: NW14 of the SE14 of Section 20,
T30N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph
3. ARTICLE: 8.4 B(4)(B), Setback from a Town Road
APPELLANT: Nolan Anderson
LOCATION: SE'k of the SE14 of Section 2,
T29N-R17W, Town of Hammond
Francis Ogden presented the request of Joan Kennedy to construct a holding tank,
explaining that this was the only system to be installed due to location of the
property. Mrs. Kennedy has a pumping agreement with Gene Cudd, dated March 18,
1985, and township approval with a $500 Performance Bond. Mr.Ogden also presented
the correspondence on widening the driveway from D.N.R., giving approval, dated 12-11-84.
Motion by Supervisor Stephens to deny the request of Arthur Partridge as they have
not sent in information required. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried.
Vote to deny: Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes.
Mr. Ralph Weggel presented his request to construct a removable dock in the St. Croix
River. He has approval from the U.S. Corps of Engineers.
Mr. Arnold Beihoffer presented his request to rehear the setback from the Apple
River and County Highwy "C". Chairman Stephens informed Mr. Beihoffer that the board
will be at the site at 1:00 p.m.
Mrs. Peter Banning presented their request to construct a lift on their property
in the St. Croix Riverway District.
Mr. Jake Vander Voort, D.N.R., has no objections to the lift.
Zoning Administrator read letter from MN-WI Boundary Area Commission having no ob-
jections to the lift.
Mr. Robert Seibenaler objected to the lift as there is a stairway on the property.
He feels that the river bank is being cluttered. He feels that this is a personal
and selfish request.
Mrs. William Mc Clelland objected to the lift.
OGDEN ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING
113 WEST WALNUT STREET
RIVER FALLS, WISCONSIN 34022
OFFICE PHONE(715)425-76
31 FRANCIS H.OGDEN. P.E.
JOB NO.
84-1482
March 25 , 1985
MAR 27 1985
u Iuro���G
Harold Barber OFR E \"
Zoning Administrator
St . Croix County
1030 Davis
Hammond, Wisconsin 54015
Re : Board of Adjustment Meeting April 30 , 1985
Joan G . Kennedy Special Exception
Government Lot 4 , Section 35 , T30N, R20W
Dear Harold;
Thank you for placing this matter on the agenda for the April 30 , 1985
meeting . Enclosed are 5 copies of the Site Plan, Plan for Wall and Driv-
ing Deck, Detail of Holding Tank, Owner-Pumper Agreement and Holding Tank
Agreement . Please forward copies of this information to the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources and the Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary Area
Commission .
Enclosed are copies of 3 letters concerning the widening of the driveway
dated November 20 , November 30 and December 11 , 1984 . The December 11th
letter indicates that the proposed wall and treated timber deck for
widening the driveway is permissable under NR118 . I understand that the
Board of Adjustment must approve this construction .
Please call me if you have any questions because I would like to get
this matter settled at the April 30 , 1985 meeting .
Respectfully yours ,
rancis H. Ogden
FHO/mo
Enclosures
OGDEN ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING
113 WEST WALNUT STREET
RIVER FALLS, WISCONSIN 34022
OFFICE PHON 425-7631 FRANCIS H.OGOEN. P.E.
.1oEllNO.
84-1.482
March 25 ' 1985
CY)
Ray Brown
Chairman
Town of St . Joseph
R. R. #2
Hudson, Wisconsin 54016
Re : Holding Tank for Joan G. Kennedy Residence
Riverview Acres
Government Lot 4, Section 35 , T30N, R20W
Dear Mr. Brown;
The dry well serving Joan Kennedy' s sewer system has failed. The Plumbing
Section of the State of Wisconsin, Department of Industry, Labor $ Human
Relations has refused to grant her approval for a replacement drain field.
Th-6y refused approval of a new drain field .becau.se it would ..be located
near a steep slope and under her driveway. Her only alternative is to
inTta-1-1 a holding tank. She has agreed to install a 3000 gallon holding
tank.
The State of Wisconsin will only approve holding tank applications that
are accompained by a Holding Tank Agreement . The Agreement makes the local
unit of government, the. Town Board in this case , responsible for . the pump-
ing of the holding tank. if the property owner does not have it pumped at
the proper time .
Attached is the Agreement which has been signed by Joan .Kennedy along
with a map showing the location of the proposed holding tank. Either Joan
Kennedy or I can attend a Town Board Meeting when this would be considered.
Please inform me of the date and time of the meeting.
Please call if you have any questions . I am normally in my office from
7 A.M. to 5 P.M. Joan Kennedy is in Texas at the present time so I am
taking care of this for her .
Respectfully y yours ,
`�
Francis H.. Ogden
FHO/mo
Enclosures - Holding Tank Agreement and map
cc : Joan Kennedy
Harold Barber, Zoning Administrator
ST. CROI X COUNTY
WISCONSIN
t• , l�,pR 1 t •!(.ti�.
�.r;•',' ' _:_•; — tc: .i1.?�i ' ' 4> 1 C E 796.-2239
Z O N I N G O F F
Poet 0666ice Box 227
'C1==�'•`I1 f t F919 Hammond, W1 54015
O W N E R
P U M P E R
A G R E E M E N T
PLEASE BE ADVISED, Tkat unat.it you axe again noti.6.ied, 1 Witt
co n t)tact. With Gene n O irlr o6 Hudson
OFZ4 conAin, (PumpeA) , 60n. the puxpos e o 6 xemov.ing att waa.te 6xom the
aan.i ta&y dya.tem to be Located on the pxopex.ty and 6utuxe home bite
Located Zn S#. CAoix County, WieConddn, Townbh.Zp o6 St. Joseph
Gov't Lot 4 ,
b e ing in the SE h o 6 the SE 4 o6. Sec.. 35
(0x m xe 6utty dea cx.i6 ed as 6 ottowb : ) Commencing at the SE corner of said
Section 35; thence N395' and W743.4' to the point of beginning; thence W256.31 ; thence
S3291 ; thence E256.31 ; thence N329' to the point of beginning. This parcel contains
1.93 acres, more or less.
Dated #h.ib ten„ day o6 ,eZ 19 $` .
(OWNER)
State of Ts-v�s )
ss:
County of G pA*pPQ /
Personally appearSa before me his t1day of
the above named Jc4 P to .me known to be t— he .person
who executed the foregoing instrument acknow dged the same.
Notary Pu i COY County,
My Commission
I, Gene D. Cudd hereinbefore referred to as Pumper, join in the
above agreement tote extent that I have a contract with Owner as above stated.
(PUMPER)
Page 2 '
i
3. Owner agrees to have a quarterly pumping report submitted to the
local government and the county which will state the Owner's name, location
of the property on which the holding tank is located, the pumper's name,
the dates, volumes pumped and the disposal site. An annual pumping report
or the fourth quarter report including a summary of the pumping history of
the previous year shall be submitted to the Department of Industry, Labor
and Human Relations by the governmental unit responsible, per section 145.01
(15), Wisconsin Statutes.
4. We guarantee that the holding tank contents will be disposed of at
a site meeting the requirements of chapter NR 113, Wisconsin Administrative
Code.
5. This agreement will remain in affect only until the sanitary permit
issuing agent in St. Croix County certifies that the subject pro-
perty is served by e r a pu c sewer or a septic tank — soil absorption
system that complies with ch. H 63, Wis. Adm. Code. In addition, this Agree-
ment may be cancelled by executing and recording said certification with re-
ference to this Agreement, in the Tract Index indicated above.
6. This agreement shall be binding upon the indicated governmental
unit and the Owner or heirs and assignees and shall run with the deed.
w
WITNESS our hands and seals this day of
19
TOWN OF St. Joseph
TOWN OWNERS
bye
by.,,
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Personally came before me this day of Q-'e
111925, ^
-the above named •J c v_ tAn CAL •
to me known to be the persons who executed the forego4ng Instrument an
acknowledged the same.
THIS 'INSTRUMENT NOTARY PU L I C Vt KosA-
DRAFTED BY: Ogden-Engineering 'Co.
My commission expires:
STATE OF ( exk-s
ss:
COUNTY OF CQ WL -Zo h. )
Personally came before _me this day f Moe-c-L 19�,
the above named _T q K, „, to me known to be the person
who executed the foregoing instrument and cknowledged the same.
r
Notary Public, County of ,
i
My Commission I L
NOTE: As spedified in H63 . 18 (4 A) Wisconsin Administrative
Code this document ' is to be recorded in the Tract Index, lo-
cated at the County Register of Deeds . At the time of Sani-
tary Permit Application, a copy of this agreement , with the
recording dates and number should be submitted to this office .
HOLDING TANK AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
19 , by and between the Town ot St. Joseph
, hereinafter called own '
ana Joan G. Kennedy hereinafter calleR t e
"Owner.
We hereby acknowledge that application has been made for a building
permit on the following described property, to wit: A.parcel of land located
in Government Lot 4 (SE1/4 SEl/4), Section 35, T30N, R20W, Town of St. Joseph, St.
Croix County, Wisconsin described as follows: Commencing at the SE corner of said Section
35; thence N395' and'W743.4' to the point of .beginning; thence W256.31 ; thence S329' ; thence
E256.3' ; thence 329' to the point of .beginning. This parcel contains 1.93 acres, more or less
or that continued use of the existing premises requires that a holding
tank be installed on the property for -the purpose of proper containment
of- sewage. We also,acknowledge that said property cannot now be served
by a municipal sewer or septic tank — soil absorption system.
Therefore., as an inducement to the County of St. Croix to
issue a sanitary permit for the above described premises, we ere y agree .
and bind ourselves as follows.
1. Owner agrees to conform to all applicable requirements of the
Plumbing Code relating to holding tanks. Any time the Town or_-Mt1Pi94p&U-bY
of St. Jose h through its Plumbing Inspector or Health Offi-
cer, deems necessary to pump out the subject holding tank, the Owner
shall have same pumped out in twenty-four (24) hours, or Town
will have said work done and charge same back to Owner and place same on
the tax bill as a special charge. The Owner further agrees that the Town
of St. Jose h may enter upon the property des-
cribed above at any reasonable time, to Inspect, or pump and haul wastes
from the subject holding tank.
2. -Owner, agrees to pay all charges aqd costs incurred by the Town ov
iu�c of St. Jospeh for inspection, pumping, hauling or
otherwise servicing and�maintaining a subject holding tank in such a man-
ner as to prevent or abate any nuisance or health hazard caused by such
holding tank. Town shall notify the Owner of any such
cost which shat a pa y the er within thirty (30.) days from the date
of notice and in the gvent that the Owner does not pay said cost within
thirty (30) days, Owner hereby specifically agrees that all of said costs
and charges may be placed on the tax roll as a special assessment for the
abatement of nuisance, and said tax shall be collected as provided by
Wisconsin Statute.
DILHR-SBD-6123 (R.3/81 )
r�
'd L >
CD N r U
rn o n Z 6' r
_ r 0
W >'
0� fLn n Z
rn (D iq 00 �
0
m r+ i o <
P.
lW. CT
Q 31
-1 O CL
0
+
L -I
0 x ll'
n
N C rf _
r 0 x'
r
� n
O O D G>
LO 02
r ,
A P
A °• _ � N l �
rip N �^ �
v ° L <
P
m r r"
p 0 D ( <
O
�G1 � O > ?iU Z0O <
Q A
N
D
O x i M < N Z o gip= P i C � A
r" CD - -a
O r Jaa n U'� � O � D 0
4 -1 J ;r. O C F r •*t 0 U '� A
Co 'v m A w D _ <
CD LP fn X
> y )J A o < DOD
wa r LCc A rn r �Z O
oa ;;E fn w O A
w H p x 0 a w :�' -n O
.z
cn o
b
o r
o
� rn
m
m m �
m %%littoral
>��• Z *���ptld � �r��
r-w S m 40� ?j��...»........ iii
o •:
C) ° m : � ' c nom= •'n '
ZR
tit![
L
r t'1
c r
r D
N O
CD r U `d
r
a' Z �
K 4�
rn r D > 0
L 0
'
o C-
C a �' n
(A N
O �
(D cD 1
q <
zZ
�• o �
0 � Iq
0 Z r <
a � v
.t
(D
w. v'
� m
n
m am
n 0 �j
0 ¢.
L +•
0 s N P
nC r+
N. .c
rlo L
O x c („ 0) =
r 0 D
o r+ L p 0
r
o m >
> o Ap
a 7o c O A
Pi-
� o Z NL IqP
n s ,U m
O O D > N MO
o f� > 1 c0P
�l
ao� °O L < - z �c Z j0 w < s L p
zip 0 � � ,� 3 n N -1 Do � O r M3
m < fn 0 •�. C b
o r Om p C O ooc+ H 0 0 -1
_ � O
r fn-1 J �z 0 p O Cl "i A
co ' 10 r
N LC - O w
n (A r
L
A rn
H (O < N O N p <
-� �^ 3 O
oy O s 0 O
C:)
?i.' b o\o
N � �
CD r
rl
rrn
> Z *4xO ptld
go 416
zn- Z �4 O } < �� is lr
m �
n�prj R1 % � �`= i{�
zh'a ; \ r. I y p �; c;C) Q ,
��
N z ,
N tilt � •�����R� i tgOt�`
Ln
tittl'tttt
State of Wisconsin ` Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations
December 17, 1984
- '_ SAFETY&BUILDINGS DIVISION
Bureau 0-111 p1m;0119
1 2011 East Washington Avenue
p�/'F P.G. Sox 7,31-59
t' Madigan, Wisconsin 537()7
f:5. Joan G. Ine*iy►
Rural Route 2
Riverview Acres
F'r Stitt, W 401 b
Pet it i oa No. 8a-07!;y-q-A
Dear Ms. f:enn yz
Re: Joan Kennedy - Residence
Private Swage System
St,SE,3S,30,2tM
Town of St. Joseph, St. Croix County, W11
They petition for a varlar4e requested to sections TLHR 83.03 (3) and ILPIR,
83.10 (i) of the i isctaIsin Administrative Gods was con=sidered 4z November 12,
1984, The petition has been denied. T`,is petition is denied because ttze 18
foot setback from a slope greater than 3 cannot weet the intent of the coot
to guarar.-tee 70 feet of area for water wt to ca se side slope seepage. The
system cannot be placed under .a driveway and meet the intent of the code.
Also. a poster auger cannot sufficiently describe soils to the depth shows.
T,e rule requires that a cson"ntianal se11 aDsurgticn syst--�,m t;e located at
least 20 feet from the drown of a landslope that is greater than 20% and a
soil absorption system is prohibitee in co acteu A-".es suer. as parking lobs
ant drivevays.
IN,e variance requested was to allr.� a syst m , be placed 18 fit xrcy:,:r a
greater than 301 sloe an to allow the system to tw placed S feet under a
<1ri vr-rway.
All of ti�3e data and statements subsitte" on &e!,alf of tam: petitioner were
co;'sid.ered. Any private spxa, system installed for this project must be
installed in accord with the requirements of the PI O—)IN Code and Wisconsin
Statuf e$. Enclosed is the department's suwary of the hasis for denial of
th;s petition... If you fsel there are misunderstandings re,gardifg the data
suNnitte'., questions of fact, or additional information n---t inclueed in t€w
initial Pe t i t Ion t en you may address a requt s t. €or a he arr iN to iiie. The
request for a hearinq ftst tae In writing, axed must incline the additional
DILHR-SBD-6423 (N.04/81)
State of Wisconsin ` Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations
14s. Joan G. Kennedy SAFETY&BUILDINGS DIVISION
Page 2
December 17, 1934
infomation, or questions of fact you feel warrant a reconsideration of your
petition. failure to list significant new infomation or questions of fact
will result in denial of the request for a hearing. This request must be
received by DILM within 30 days from the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
James Quinlan, Chief
Section of Private Sewage
,3Q E :QCs
Erxlasure
cc: Leroy J.ansky, PIrivate Sewage Consultant - Oistrict 6. Chippewa falls
.arold C. Harmer, Zoning Administrator - Sts Croix County
f r&nces H. Ogden, 09der Engineering Co many
DILHR-SBO-6423 (N.04/81)
State of Wisconsin ` Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations
C�T SAFETY&BUILDINGS DIVISION
Novembe r 21, 19��4 t1L lr>e au €�f P l i rah
201 East Washington Avenue
P.O. Box 7969
Madison., Wisconsin 53707
Ms. Joan 0,. Kennedy Rural Route 2
Riverview Acres
Hudson, WI 54015
Petition liv. 64-07632-P
Dear 14s, Kennedy:
Re: ,loan Kennedy - Residence
Private Sewage System
SE,SE,3§,30,20W
Tom of St. Joseph, St. Croix County, W1
We have reviewed your request for a petition for variame.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that unless you can provide this
Bureau with additional inferlaaticn to explain and justif y your petition,
Beau staff will recomenti decrial of this petit,W.
The analysis of your data and conclusions for petition; denial are included in
the suvv4rry worksheet attached.
If you would like to submit additional infomation is response to our
conclusions we will expedite continuatio4 f tie petition review and notify
you of the final decision. If no a4d'itional inf>orration is received within
two ads from the date of this letter the petitions will be forwarikW to the
division administrator with tie recomm datl for denial.
You could also withdraw your petition request am' we will return your file
copy to you. Please notify ass of your intent to withdraw within 2 weeks so
that the denial is not cimpleted.
Sincere ly,
James Quinlan. Chief
Section of Private Sewage
J :�qp�� X�r�n
V s fr.t-��w i\i
Enclosure
cc; Leroy Jansky, Private Sewage Ccnssltin District : , Cnipp wa Falls
vilar°old C. Barber, Zoning Administrator St. t;roix County
Frances H. Ogden, Ogden EN i oeer i ng Ce lmny
DILHRSBD-6423 (N.04/81)
f y `
December 17, 19104
PETITION FOR VARIANCE: SectionsILHR 83.09 (3) and ILHR 83.10 ( 1), Wis.
Adm. Code.
PETITION NUMBER: 84-07692-P
PETITIONER: Ms. Joan G. Kennedy
Rural Route 2
Riverview Acres
Hudson, WI 54016
BUILDING OR PROJECT: Residence/Private Sewage System
SE,SE,35,30,20W
Town of St. Joseph, St. Croix County, WI
CODE REQUIREMENT: A conventional soil absorption system shall be
located at least 20 feet from the crown of a
landslope that is greater than 20% and a soil
absorption system is prohibited in compacted
areas such as parking lots and driveways.
VARIANCE REQUESTED: To allow a system to be placed 18 feet from a
greater than 30% slope and to allow the system to
be placed 5 feet under a driveway.
PETITIONER'S STATEMENTS: 1. The edge of the top of the seepage pit will
be 18 feet horizontal from the slope greater than
30%.
2. If you put a system under a driveway at
deeper than 5 feet there will be no compaction at
that distance.
COMMENTS: 1. This soil data was obtained by the use of a
power auger and therefore, conditions of the soil
cannot accurately be determined.
2. This is a system that would have to be placed
with the top of the seepage pit being at least 5
feet below the driveway.
3. The slope is greater than 20% therefore, it
is called a bluff line and the possibility of
side slope seepage from the effluent is too great.
RECOMMENDATION: Denial. This petition is denied because the 18
foot setback from a slope greater than 30% cannot
meet the intent of the code to guarantee 20 feet
of area for water not to cause side slope
seepage. The system cannot be placed under a
meet driveway and m t the intent of the code. Also
a power auger cannot sufficiently describe soils
o the dr shown,, a
Prepared b Date:
.� /8y
Edmund M. Drozd, CPS
Soil Scientist
Section of Private Sewage
Endorsed by: '"''� + Date:
r"
Jam argent -�
DirLsctor
DEPARTMENT ACTION:
Signature: Date:
Ed McClai-6—
Division Admin strator
'9
.,j
,j
3
4
}
S
3
-s
I
State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
�9 West Central District Head uarters
1300 West Clairemont Avenue Carroll D.eesedny
Gall Box 4001 secretary
Eau Claire, WI 54702-4001
December 11, 1984 File Ref: 3590-8
• Mr. Francis H. Ogden
Ogden Engineering Company
123 East Elm Street
River Falls, WI 54022
Dear Mr. Ogden:
We have previously corresponded concerning the construction and
backfilling of railroad tie walls on the Joan Kennedy property in St.
Croix County. Your letter of November 30, 1984 asked if such walls
could be built and then the opening spanned by prestressed concrete or
treated timbers.
I have checked with our legal staff, and we are of the opinion that
this would not constitute a violation of NR 118.06(12)2.a. Please
remember that St. Croix County must also approve this construction.
All necessary permits must be issued by the county and possibly the
township.
If you have any further questions about this matter, please contact me.
Sincerely,
C
Jake VanderVoort
Community Services Specialist
cc: R. Henneger - LEG/5
K. Christopherson - WRZ/5
Steve Johnson, MWBAC, 619 2nd Street, Hudson, WI 54016
Harold Barber, Zoning Administrator, P.O. Box 227, Hammond, WI
54015
JVT391
OGDEN ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING
123 EAST ELM STREET
RIVER FALLS, WISCONSIN 54022
OFFICE PHONE(715)425-7631 FRANCIS H.OGDEN. P.E.
JOB NO. 84-1482
November 30 , .1984
Jake VanderVoort
'State of Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
West Central District Headquarters
1300 West Clairemont Avenue
Call Box 4.001
Eau Claire , Wisconsin 54702-4001
Re : Joan Kennedy Special Exception
Dear Jake ;
I. received a letter from Richard W. Henneger, Attorney at Law, .Department
of Natural Resources, Madison, dated November 20 , 1984, regarding Joan
Kennedy' s request for a special exception to construct two 4' high rail-
road tie walls . He indicated that the code would allow the construction
of the walls but prohibited filling of the area between the wall and
adjoining lands with slopes less than 12% . He indicated that Section
NR 118 .0.6 (12) 2 .a . , Wis . Adm. Code does not allow filling or grading on
slopes greater than 12%. {
I discussed this matter with Joan and she directed me to find out from
your Department whether she could construct 4' high walls in the locations
shown on th:e .previously submitted drawings and span the area between the
wall and her driveway with either prestressed concrete or treated timber.
By doing so she would not fill or grade on slopes greater than 12% and
therefore be in compliance with NR 118 .
I would appreciate a written response at your earliest convenience .
Respectfully yours,
Francis H. Ogden
FHO/mo
cc : Joan Kennedy
1 State of Wisconsin \ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL.RESOURCES
v Carroll D. Besadny
Secretary
BOX 7921
MADISON,WISCONSIN 53707
November 20, 1984 File Ref: 8300
• Mr. Francis H. Ogden
123 East Elm Street
River Falls, WI 54022
Dear Mr. Ogden:
Your letter dated October 8, 1984 to Jake VanderVoort regarding Joan
Kennedy's special exception for four feet high railroad tie walls has
been referred to my office.
It is my understanding that you intend to construct two four (4)-foot
high railroad tie walls. These walls will be built on slopes in excess
of 12% and then backfilled.
As you are aware, section NR 118.06(4) , Wis. Adm. Code states that structures
(such as railroad tie walls) are allowed on slopes greater than 12% if
the slope does not face the St., Croix River. Consequently, the structure
would appear to be permissible under the regulations.
However,d section NR 118.06(12) 2.a. , Wis. Adm. Code does not allow filling
or gradtr'An slopes greater than 12%. Therefore, the construction of
the tie wall as proposed is not permissible under the Lower St. Croix
Riverway Ordinance.
It is my understanding that the structure could be modified without encroaching
on the 12% slope. I encourage you to seek these modifications.
Sincerely,
BUREAU OF LEGAL SERVICES
Richard W. Henneger
Attorney at Law
RWH/mj
cc: Ken Christopherson-WRZ/5
Jake VanderVoort-Eau Claire
OGDEN ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING
123 EAST ELM STREET
RIVER FALLS, WISCONSIN 54022
OFFICE PHONE(715)425-7631 FRANCIS H.OGDEN. P.E.
JOB NO. 84-1482
� O �
October 8, 1984
M z �� C
Jake VanderVoort Lo
State of Wisconsin. .
Department of Natural Resources {
West Central District Headquarters
1300 West Clairemont Avenue
Call Box 4001
Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702-4001.
Re : Joan Kennedy Special Exception
Dear Jake ;
I recieved a copy of. your letter today objecting to the 4 ' high railroad
tie walls I have proposed on this project . I believe that NR 118 .06 (4)
allows the construction of walls on slopes greater than 12% if the slope
does not face the lower St. Croix River . The slopes where I have .pr.oposed
to build the 2 walls do not face the River . The definition . of structure
(NR 118 .02 (25) ) includes walls .
When we discussed this matter by telephone several weeks ago you said that
you would be willing to seek a written legal opinion from your central office .
I request that you obtain an .opinion at this time. There are existing rail-
road tie walls on the property and the proposed walls would simply be ex-
tensions of them. There are no erosion problems related to the existing walls
so it is reasonable to believe that the -proposed walls will not cause erosion.
Respectfully yours,
Francis H. Ogden �V
FHO/mo
cc : Harold Barber
Joan Kennedy
4bestState of Wisconsin \ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Central District Headquarters Cerro/l D. Bessdny
300 West Clairemont Avenue Secretary
Call Box 4001
Eau Claire, WI 54702-4001 7 8
September 28, 1984 •/'J O / File Ref: 3590-8
c� F�
r,Fo 0
9
Mr. Harold Barber
Zoning Administrator `r
Zoning Office
Hammond, WI 54015
Dear Mr. Barber:
You recently sent me a copy of an appeal submitted by Mrs. Joan G.
Kennedy for my review. The appeal is for a special exception use
permit to construct an addition onto her existing home. Due to a
scheduling conflict, I was unable to attend the Board of Adjustments
hearing on this appeal.
I have visited the site on the ground and have viewed it from the
river. It is my opinion that the proposed addition would be visually
inconspicuous from the river. In reviewing the site plan submitted by
Francis H. Ogden, professional engineer, I noted the construction
included two four-foot high railroad tie walls. These walls were to be
built on slopes in excess of 12 percent and then backfilled to widen
the existing driveway. Section NR 118.06(12)(a)2b prohibits grading or
filling on slopes greater than 12 percent. We will have to object to
the granting of any special exception use permit which includes filling
on slopes in excess of 12 percent.
I have reviewed the proposal carefully, and it appears that the house
addition could be designed and built without encroaching on slopes in
excess of 12 percent. While it may be inconvenient to use the existing
driveway, a variance to the prohibition, against filling on slopes in
excess of 12 percent cannot be granted under any circumstances. If you
have any questions about this matter, please contact me at (715) 836-
2941 .
Sincerely,
eke ZVand6erVoort
Community Services Specialist
cc: J. Lissack
J. DeLaMater
K. Christopherson - WRZ/5
Steve Johnson, MWBAC, 619 2nd Street, Hudson, WI 54016
JVT367
4. Steven Weekes: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to deny this request for driveway
separation as present driveway crosses over the Weekes property and Mr. Weekes can
branch off the driveway near the entrance. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion
carried. Vote to deny: Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes; Meinke, absent.
5. Alex Koss: Motion by Supervisor Kelly to approve the request of Alex Koss as it
has adequate setback from the bluffline and will be constructed in the same area as
the present porch and deck. Seconded by Supervisor Stephens. Motion carried. Vote
to approve: Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes; Meinke, absent.
The next scheduled meeting and hearing date is October 23, 1984 at 9:00 a.m.
Motion by Supervisor Kelly to adjourn. Seconded by Supervisor Stephens. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
Harold C. Barber, Acting Secretary
HCB:mj
•
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
September 25, 1984
9:00 - 2:30 p.m.
Meeting called to order by Chairman Stephens at 9:00 a.m. in the County Board Room,
Courthouse, Hudson. Present were Supervisors Stephens and Kelly. Absent Supervisor
Meinke. Minutes of the August meeting and hearing approved as written.
Discussion on the Richard Sirek request of August. Board will view the property again,
and make a final decision.
Hearing called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Chairman Stephens. Zoning Administrator read
notice of hearings as published in the county and local newspapers.
1. ARTICLE: 3.4 B, Rip-rap
APPELLANT: David A. Kobs
LOCATION: NW4 of the NW14 of Section 31,
T31N-R18W, Town of Star Prairie.
2. ARTICLE: 3.12, Setback from Bluffline, St. Croix Riverway District
APPELLANT: Joan Kennedy
LOCATION SEk of the SE'k of Section 35,
T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph.
3. ARTICLE: 8.4 F (1)(c), Driveway Separation
APPELLANT: Steven Weekes
LOCATION: Gov't. Lot #3, Lot 14, Section 13,
T28N-R20W, Town of Troy.
4. ARTICLE: 3.12 H (1)&(2), Pre-existing Parcel, St. Croix Riverway District
APPELLANT: Alex Koss
LOCATION: Lots 22 & 23, St. Croix Cove,
NWk of the NA of Section 24,
T28N-R20W, Town of Troy
Mr. David Kobs presented his request to place rip-rap on his property in the Apple River,
explaining that the river has been lowered and wants to preserve the shoreline. He has
an application in to D. N. R. Questions by Board members.
Mrs. Joan Kennedy presented her request to construct an addition to her present struc-
ture. The addition would be a bedroom, laundry room, and garage. She feel that this is
a hardship case, as she has no other area to build. Questions by Board members.
Mr. Steven Weekes presented his request to have a driveway separation that would have
less than 200 foot separation from an adjoining driveway. At the present time he has
a joint driveway and would like to separate them.
Mr. Alex Koss presented his request to remove a deck and screen porch and construct an
addition that would be in the same location. The addition would contain additional
kitchen and dining area with a lower and upper deck. The;•addition would be approximately
42 feet from the bluffline. Question by Board members.
Chairman Stephens recessed the hearings to inspect the properties in question. Board
returned to session to render decisions.
1. Richard Sirek: After reinspection of the property, a motion was made by Supervisor
Stephens to grant approval of his request for a driveway separation of less than 200
feet. The present driveway shall be removed. When driveway is completed, it shall be
inspected by the Zoning Administrator to insure compliance. Seconded by Supervisor
Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes; Meinke, absent.
2. David Kobs: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to approve on condition there is approval
from D. N. R. for rip-rap. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to
approve: Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes; Meinke, absent.
3. Joan Kennedy: Motion by Supervisor Stephens that the sewer is in violation of
ILHR 83, and table this appeal until approval from the state has been given. Decision
will be made in October if approval has been received from the state at that time.
Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to table: Stephens, yes; Kelly,
yes; Meinke, absent.
rr,--
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION
Request of Joan G. Kennedy for a special )
exception use, Article 3. 12, Setback from )
Bluffline, St. Croix Riverway District, ) A-52-84
ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. ) September 25, 1984
Location: SEk of the SE'k of Section 35, )
T30N-R2OW, Town of St. Joseph. )
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing on
September 25, 1984 to consider the request of Joan G. Kennedy for a special
exception use, Articld 3. 12, Setback from Bluffline, St. Croix Riverway District,
ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE.
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment conducted an on-site inspection
of the site in question.
After inspection, the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment entered an
Executive Session to discuss the request.
After returning to open session, . the following decision was rendered:
Motion by Supervisor Stephens that the sewer is in violation of ILHR 83,
and table this appeal until approval from the state has been given. Decision
will be made in October if approval has been received from the state at that time.
Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried.
Vote to table:
•
Stephens, yes;
Kelly, yes;
Meinke, absent.
� I
All variances approved must be acted on or consturcted within one (1) year
from date of approval or they shall be null and void.
Vernon Kelly, Secretary
St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
VK:HB:mj
Joan G. Kennedy
Town Clerk
Francis Ogden
Jake Vander Voort
Steve Johnson
Dick Thompson
OGDEN ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING
123 EAST ELM STREET
RIVER FALLS, WISCONSIN 54022
OFFICE PHONE(715)425-7631 FRANCIS H.OGDEN. P.E.
84-1482
JOB NO.
August 9, 1984
Joan G. Kennedy
Riverview Acres
R. R. #2
Hudson, Wisconsin 54016
Re : Special Exception. for Addition to Your Home Located in the SE1/4 of
the SE1 4 , Section 25, T35N, R20W, Town of St . Joseph, St . Croix
ounty•
Dear Joan;
I have investigated your desire to add an addition on to your home con-
sisting of a bedroom and bathroom on the main floor and a garage in the
basement . It is to be located on the North side of your existing house.
If St. Croix County decides to revise their Lower St. Croix Scenic
Riverway Zoning Ordinance to include all of the revisions in the recently
enacted Wisconsin Admistrative Code Chapter NR118, Standards and Criteria
for the Lower St . Croix National Scenic Riverway, dated February 1984,
you should be able to comply with the regulations and obtain a special
exception.
I have investigated the soils in .the location of the proposed addition
by performing four soil borings to a depth of 25 feet below the existing
grade and find the soils to be coarse brown sand & gravel . The U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Classification is
Emmert loamy sand with a sand & gravel substratum. At proposed footing
depths the soil will be sand & .gravel. It is non-plastic , has a permea-
bility greater than 20 inches per hour, a low shrink-swell potential and
an allowable bearing value in excess of 3000 pounds per square foot. The
soils are very adequate to support the proposed addition.
There is little chance for serious erosion problems to develop if moderate
care is taken while the construction is in progress . When the construction
is completed all disturbed areas around the addition and the driveway
should be covered with a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil and sodded.
I opened the existing septic tank and determined that it .has a capacity
of 818 gallons . The Wisconsin Administrative Code ILHR 83 requires a
minimum of 750 gallons for septic tanks serving 1 and 2 bedroom single
family homes . Therefore your septic tank is adequate for the proposed
addition.
Joan G. Kennedy Page 2
I have investigated your seepage pit (drywell) and find it to be very
inadequate. It is approximately one-half the size required for a one
bedroom home. The day I checked it was full of liquid to the same level
as the liquid in your septic tank. This indicates that the seepage pit
has failed due to clogging of the pores in the surrounding soil . I re-
commend that your seepage pit be replaced with a completely new drywell
or drywells which will be adequate to serve your existing home and pro-
posed addition. During our telephone conversation on August 6, 1984, . you
directed me to seek approval from the County and the Plumbing Section of
the State of Wisconsin, Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations
for replacement seepage pits which will be adequate to serve your present
home and proposed addition . I am now seeking such approval .
Respectfully yours,
Francis H. Ogden
FHO/mo
(2)
The present structure has been used as a single family
residence since it was constructed in 1969. With the
proposed addition it would continue to be used as a single
family residence. The proposed addition to the pre-existing
structure does not increase the use of the property.
Respectfully submitted,
Joan G Kennedy
August 15 , 1984
Enclosures:
A. Application for permit
B. Tonigraphical survey
C . Plat of Riverview Acres
D. Ogden Engineering Report
1 . Soil borings
2. Erosion
3. Septic tan's
4. Drywell
E. Affidavit 5-15-74
F. Photos of project site
G. 3uildin� Plans
JOAN C. KENNEDY APPLICATION
FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT
NATURE OF PROJECT
I, Joan U. Kennedy, am the owner of a tract of land of
1.93 acres , located in the town of St. Joseph, St. Croix
County , Wisconsin with frontage on the St. Croix River.
This property is within the defined area of the St. Croix
River Valley District, Section 3. 12, St. Croix Zoning
Ordinance.
In May of 1974, I purchased this property with an existing
residential structure located approximately in the center of
the 1.93 acres. The structure consists basically of one
large room with a small partition for one bedroom and a three-
quarter bath facility. As set forth in the enclosed affidavit
dated May 15 , 1974, it was my ':intent at the time of purchase
to remodel and expand the existing residential structure.
The enclosed building plan shows the addition to the existing
structure that I propose to construct. It would consist of
a lower level garage and utility room with a kitchen, bedroom
and bathroom on the main level. The existing bedroom would be
opened to the living area for dining space. The present
structure , which is without proper kitchen, laundry and bath-
room facilities also lacks a basement and garage. It is there-
fore inadequate.
It is sub:aitted that the construction of this addition in the
proposed driveway area will not be visually conspicuous from
the river. As evidenced in the enclosed photos, trees and
vegetation totally shield the project area from river view.
The building plans for the addition would not require any tree
removal on the bluffside of the property.
Sy-S�
, SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE ' PL KMI`1' APP LIC/�_JON FOR CIa)1X COUNTY
• ` I' he undersigned hereby, a to .the ST. CROJ ?, COUNTY BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT pursuant to Chapter 9 .0f the S'J'. CIZOIX COUca'1'Y 'l..ON1[vG U►.uINANCE
for a special gxc6ptiOn use ,�crmit aild rel)rc:;Unts a:; 1_ul luws
APPLICANT ------{----
-r
ADDRESS L2 ia4u:2- �tglr
OWNER of SITE
ADDRESS
ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRA, TUkt_
e e
'G—
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE
All
� r
All))MSS OF SITE
TYPE OF STUCTURE C2#g.Be_&
PROPOSED USE OF STRUCTURE OR SITE-
ZONING- DISTRICT. St. Cxoix RiveAwatl Dint Act
SECTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE WHICH IDENTIFIES THIS USE AS A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE IN THE ZONING DISTRICT 3.12 Setback jum Stuji
PLAT OR SURVEY OR SCALE MAP MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION.
The applicant must sutlmit , as part of this application, those items
of information identified in the following; checklist as being relevant to
the ordinance standards applicable to the proposed Use -
DATE Caj SIG NED
Payment of $100. 00 payable to St . Croix County Zoning Administration is ' '
due at, time o,f submittal to Zoning Office of application.
vl
v
M �
SPECIAL EXCEPTION. USE PERMIT CHECK-LIST
NOTE: The following checklist identifies information to be
Included with the application for a conditional use permit.
The applicant Is required to submit to the zoning office
all of those items of information marked with an "X."
I . A Title sheet which includes the following information:
a. project location map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .fZZ71
b. total lot area �°.� :s. . . . ,
C. building/dwelling unit Information:
I
I . number of buildings per parcel . . . . . . . . . .�
2. number of dwelling units per building . . . . . .Q
3. average square feet of lot area per
dwelling unit provided. . . . . . . . . . . . . .El
4. usable open space per dwelling unit provided. . .LJ
5. total usable open space provided. . . . . . . . .0
r 2. A General Development Plan which includes the following
Information:
a. statement describing the general character of the
Intended development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. accurate (to scale) map of the project area in-
cluding its relationship to surrounding properties
and existing topography and key natural features .Q
C. number of parking spaces provided. . . . . . . . . . .�
d. underground electric and telephone service . . . . . .Q
3. Complete description -of existing utilities adjacent to site
Existing and workable proposed grades (contour lines
at two foot contour interval minimum) and surface
drainage. Supplement the contour lines with spot
elevations along drainage swales where necessary.
If the project is adjacent to an existing improved
street, elevation of the top of curb and sidewalk shall
be Indicated at 50 foot stations.
If the street and/or sidewalk is not existing,
proposed elevations shall be shown .
d
b. Complete existing and proposed storm sewer and
sanitary sewer information including pipe sizes,
invert elevation of, manhole, inlets, etc. . . . . .
C. Property lines, building sizes, locations and
distance between both existing and proposed. . . . . I...,-%J
d. Location of all easements, existing or proposed. . Q
e. Location, type and size of all existing trees,
utility poles, fire hydrants and other structures,
etc. , both on-site and in all street terraces
adjacent to the site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
f. Parking lot information:
I . A scaled drawing plot plan of I" = 20' or
larger of all on-site surface, structure
or underground parking. . . . . . . . . . . . . �
2. Location of driveway approaches--existing,
proposed and adjoining. . . . . . . . . . . . . [�
3. Rate of slope or grade or approaches and
driveways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
4. Indicate number, arrangement and size ze o f
r✓ parking stalls and drive aisles. . . . . . . . C]
g. Vehicular access to inner courts for emergency
servicing of buildings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q
h. Pedestrian walks connecting buildings, other
buildings, and on-site parking areas and with
public sidewalks. (Walks shall be kept separate
from drive aisles and driveways. ) . . . . . 0
I . Building floor plans and elevations. . . . . . . . . �
4. Statements regarding the impact of the proposed project on
a. schools. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. police and fire services . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. groundwater supply and quality . . . . . . . . . . .
e. surrounding uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [�
f.
local Economy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [�
ci. local government fiscal situation. .
. �
c '
5. Site roclamation plan (mining, quarrying and
�.� drl l I i ng operations) . . . . . . . . . . .
.r�
6. Shoreland Impact statements as described in
Section of the County
Shoreland Zoning Ordinance. . . . . . . . . . . . . �
7. Floodplain Impact Statement as described in
Section of the County �
Floodplain Zoning Ordinance. . . . . . . . .
8. Shore Protection Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Erosion/Runoff Control Plan .
.
10. Other items as specified by the zoning office:
1 1 . NampA and addAPAA �,� ,,PY . k-"
adjoining tandowne&6 .
Pf V1%Is
-s tom,, v. a �� i.s� -IF
I
,gz
------------------t-0,
7-0
Ex IS 7-1,1Y16-
If
Tc'oPOS �I� 3 o no ,4Ci� � \C)b
0 Z-
tAOIR
EX/S1T/rt�� s`9rV/T,9�y� s�w�� " �
ui
ui
•
uj
(o 0)
O co
r9
c, ------
PROPOSED
70 TO HOUSE
Wi LL
i / EXISTING
h ; WOOD DECK
Zp
202 .6'
EXISTING
HOUSE
E X I S T I N G 1 1
WOOD DECK
EXISTING
DRIVEWAY EXISTING PARCEL , 1 . 9 3 A. ±
_
REC. AS P REC. AS WEST, 743.4
WEST 256.3'
RES BLUFFLI N E �I '
i a
A v MORE I s<O
'0F
N�PSgOG• �'-� Qi I c�v � R
-- -- -� N Q M /� N
M
° 55E
Li ►- �_/1 w o LPN
p Lr o= EXISTING/ Z C
HOUSE s�0
A
°\°
OR
REC. AS P/L
EAST 256.3
i
BOTTOM OF SLOPE
5
°\°
l
BACK WATERS
G�V 0
v PC,
ROUX ,
ORDINARY WATER LINE -���--
OCT. 2, 1979
ELEV. : 35.7' +•