HomeMy WebLinkAbout026-1008-60-000 (2) o C°• •
e 3 0 3 0
p be p E»
00 N O
h c c
N
w O O
a �D Z) o N
0
N
N x 3� 0(31 a
CD 0cao03
c CL o 0
x o N._ N—
m
_
N +� t U.-.ILL I
Y � O
Oyi 7 c ~
E
00
c
N O.a O
CT N m N f•E
N ^ D7 N O N 4) N �
_ O
O U O N d O 0
c Z C)N O Q O C C Z _ N
LL o O m U t_p:: N N LL_ p N O
m C N 0 f9 t ._ "O
c =5 CD(n a�a� o. 3 '5 m E
E Q inaxi�9 co E Q
C, M aai
Z 4) y y y
M ) z ! a m a m
I I
O z 'd' c c
d Z o c m c
r N
(n F N
c E c E
IN N N N
D) CY 5)
f4 U fa
CL CL
N
N N c
N N 0 0 0
N
O
O ._
N d N
a`
I
0
c -o O �_
N
O Z Im Z Z 00 Z O O
Z Z o
d M I y
^�
�a
E 16 E E
V p o
a
to C. 10 ate+ (0 Lo w
Ln TVI�• 'I: 'c o a` a o c a` a c
E c Iy- F Fy- _� °) H FN- H _a U
0 0 3 3 3 a o
•� � aaa ILaaa
' U
V1 J r-- d C) C }
00 00
LO
M c � m c n
N Cf) N W
U O) wJ
O
00 C _ f�yd C ` N C
m O - 0 E 0 a) ( LL 0 Q N W C) O
F COO ~ > O 4 'E c O C7 2 C a N N
W 00 O c0 J C m m co c 0 N N
00•O ��, o o I s L .. € N O N M i N m
� Y Z T _ Z o N o t
U}
I
I
CL
jL
• .^.r C. y .V 4) a C N a w
r� c °' c
r A V a t II o U) 0 Z5 0
I
Parcel #: 026-1008-60-000 07/28/2009 02:57 PM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel M 03.30.18.311 026-TOWN OF RICHMOND
Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
O-VASSER, CAMERON L&CLAUDETTE J
CAMERON L&CLAUDETTE J VASSER
415 RICHARDS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33755
Districts: SC=School SP=Special Property Address(es): *=Primary
Type Dist# Description * 1243 175TH AVE
SC 3962 NEW RICHMOND
SP 8020 UPPER WILLOW REHAB DIST
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 0.530 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 3 T30N R1 8W PT NE SW W 1 00'OF E Block/Condo Bldg:
472' OF N 233'OF NE SW
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
03-30N-18W
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
11/09/2004 779451 2692/326 WD
11/09/2004 779448 2692/320 TI
09/10/1998 586880 1356/296 SD
07/23/1997 1100/540 WD
more
2009 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
0
Valuations: Last Changed: 09/09/2008
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 0.530 18,600 159,000 177,600 NO
Totals for 2009:
General Property 0.530 18,600 159,000 177,600
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2008:
General Property 0.530 18,600 159,000 177,600
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch#:
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
c ;
A building permit is required but could not be refused if a proper
application was submitted.
Discussion on building and waste management plan.
MARZOLF AND MUELLER
Nelson presented a letter from Dan Koich, DNR, who objected to the
conditional approvals granted by the Board of Adjustment on these
properties. In his letter he is requesting that it be reconsidered
and denied because of the objections of the DNR.
Motion by Kinney, seconded by Stephens to leave the decision as it
stands in part because of the conflicting testimony given by DNR.
Roll call vote: Kinney, yes; Stephens, yes; Menter, yes; Neuman,
no; Bradley, no.
Motion carried to leave the decision as originally granted.
NEW BUSINESS
Hearing was called to order at 8:30 A.M. Nelson read the notice of
the hearing as published:
1. ARTICLE: 17.14(6) (h) Exceeding No. of animal units
APPELLANT: Gary Duclos/Duclos Farms
LOCATION: Part of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 9, T28N-R19W,
Town of Troy
2. ARTICLE: 17.15(6) (a) Duplex
APPELLANT: LaVerne & Rosella Kattre
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 3, T30N-R18W,
Town of Richmond
3. ARTICLE: 17.18(1) (r) Expanding a commercial enterprise
APPELLANT: Walter & Deborah Briskie
LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 28, T29N-R15W,
Town of Springfield
4. ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (c) Road setback
APPELLANT: Gerald Brennan
LOCATION: N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 30, T30N-R18W,
Town of Richmond
5. ARTICLE: 17.64(5) (2) Driveway separation
APPELLANT: Thomas F. Marson
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 and the NW 1/4 of the NW
1/4 of Sec. 9, T28N-R19W, Town of Troy
6. ARTICLE: 17.35(5) (C)1 Setback from bluff
17.31(5) (1) Filling and grading
APPELLANT: Marc Putman/Dr. John Foker
LOCATION: Gov't Lot 1, Sec. 36, T28N-R20W,
Town of Troy
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
November 23 , 1992
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter)
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 8:00 A.M.
Bradley explained the procedures of the hearing, requesting that
individuals wishing to testify sign their names and addresses on
the sheet in the front of the room.
Supervisors Kinney, Stephens, Menter, Neuman, and Bradley were all
in attendance. Staff included Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator and
Greg Timmerman, Corporation Counsel.
Menter made a motion seconded by Stephens to approve the agenda.
Motion carried.
Bradley made a motion to approve the minutes as corrected.
Seconded by Stephens. Motion carried.
The next regular meeting will be December 29, 1992.
OLD BUSINESS
AMES CONSTRUCTION
Greg Paranto presented an amendment to his original request for a
nonmetallic mining application for the mining of clay. The new
information included a two (2) year limit on the mining and
restoration activities.
The total depth of the excavation will be no deeper than ten (10)
feet, taking about twenty-five thousand (25000) cubic yards of
material.
Motion by Stephens, seconded by Menter to approve the request as
presented restricting it to a two (2) year operation period.
Motion carried.
JON-DE FARM
Keith Rodli, attorney representing the township of Rush river
expressed concerns for a hospital barn that was recently
constructed.
Nelson stated that the hospital barn had no reflection on the
decision of number of animal units permitted by the Jon-De
operation.
be met as well as permits for septic system and EPA hazardous
material storage. Setback variances to granted providing addition
is no closer to the road than the existing structure.
THOMAS MARSON
Motion by Neuman seconded by Bradley to deny the request for the
driveway separation of less than five hundred (500) feet. No
hardship could be shown.
Roll call vote: Kinney, no; Menter, yes; Stephens, yes; Neuman,
yes; Bradley, yes. Motion carried 4:1.
Respectively submitted:
f
Georg Menter, secre ay�
TCN:cj
I
I
GARY DUCLOS/DUCLOS FARMS
Nelson read a letter from Gary Duclos stating that he was
withdrawing his application and that he would operate his farm in
accordance to the St. Croix County Zoning ordinance.
Discussion.
MMI & "
'Nelson stated that this proposal was for a duplex in the Ag.-
Residential district of Richmond Township. He outlined the
standards that should be considered when reviewing this
application.
Rosella presented her request stating that they were selling the
residence and the new owners wanted to make sure it had the proper
permits.
Discussion on the existing construction.
WALTER & DEBORAH BRISKIE
Walter presented a request for special exception to expand his
grinding business by adding onto the existing building.
The current structure is also too close to the town road and
requires a setback variance.
Discussion on lot size, septic system, and commercial code
requirements.
GERALD BRENNAN
Gerald was not present to give testimony.
THOMAS MARSON
Joe Ryan presented a request to place a driveway less than five
hundred (500) feet along STH 35. There should be access along the
town road but so as to not interrupt the efficiency of the farming
of the property they are requesting this access.
Upon completion of the hearing the Board of Adjustment visited each
site in question after which they entered in closed session to
render the following decisions:
MARC PUTMAN/DR. JOHN FOKER
Prior to the hearing, Marc Putman requested that their hearing be
delayed until the next month so as to receive DNR recommendations.
` +lotion by Stephens seconded by Bradley to conditionally approve the
duplex use providing the lower bedroom has a safe egress window and
smoke detectors are installed on both levels. Motion carried.
WALTER & DEBORAH BRISKIE
Motion by Menter seconded by Kinney to conditionally approve the
expansion of the grinding shop. All commercial building codes must
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
The Application of: DECISION
LaVerne I. & Rosella Kattre File No. 75-92
I
I'
A hearing was held in the above referenced matter on Nov. 23, 1992
before the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, Chairperson John
Bradley and members, Jerome Neuman, Robert Stephens, Bernard
Kinney, and George Menter.
The applicant, LaVerne I. & Rosella Kattre, whose address is 1243 -
175th Ave. , New Richmond, WI 54017 requests a special exception use
permit pursuant to section 17.15(6) (a) of the St. Croix County
zoning ordinance for the following described parcel of land, which
applicant owns located in the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 3,
T30N-R18W, Town of Richmond, St. Croix County, Wisconsin.
The applicant proposes to use the lower level of the single family
residence as a second living quarters (duplex) .
FINDINGS OF FACT
1) The structure is constructed so there could be two living
quarters; one upstairs with two bedrooms and another downstairs
with one bedroom;
2) The septic system was recently replaced for a three bedroom
structure;
3) The bedroom window in the lower level does not meet the building
code requirements for safe egress;
4) The structure is located in an area where there are other
duplexes.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Board of Adjustment has the authority to grant special
exception use permits as per 17.70(7) of the St. Croix County Land
Use Ordinance.
Duplexes are a special exception as per 17.15(6) (a) of the
ordinance.
DECISION
Based on the finding of fact and conclusions of law, the
application of Laverne I. & Rosella Kattre for a special exception
use permit is conditionally approved with the following conditions:
1) A safe code compliant egress window be installed in the basement
bedroom;
2) Designated parking be provided for five (5) cars;
3) Smoke alarms/detectors be installed on each level.
NAME YES/NO
Voting: John Bradlely yes
Bernard Kinney yes
George Menter yes
Robert Stephens yes
Jerome Neuman yes
This decision expires after one year from the date of the decision.
If the proposal is not commenced within that time, a new
application must be submitted and approved before proceeding with
the proposal. If the proposal is not completed within that time,
an extension of the decision must be obtained.
This decision may be revoked by the Board, after notice and
hearing, if any condition of the decision is violated.
This decision may be appealed by any person aggrieved by the
decision by filing with the St. Croix County Circuit Court an
action for certiorari within thirty (30) days of the date of filing
this decision. Applicant assumes all risk of relying on this
decision within the thirty (30) day appeal period.
John Bradley , C airman Filed: 7 02
DATE: Nov. 30, 1992
ST. CROIX CO. ZONING OFFICE
911 4th St.
Hudson, WI
(715) 386-4680
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION
NO:_-�" FEE: $150.00
DATE 0C-7-0 136-2 rl y 92
APPLICANT OR AGENT: AA ilEkA) 1. i4 ND <0 SE LL1I KA7'TJ26-_
C4X-J
ADDRESS: /d.J13 /75 Y/ 4119 Al,-- /R1 C' 1n6NDPHONE: 7/5--1 y6- 9/o uM,�.-
AP 6-7#4017
OWNER: (SA inF)
ADDRESS• 5,911 c)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT, SUBDIVISION:
7� NE 1/4, sw 1/4, Sec. , T_-3_0N, R /8 W, Town of A'/eNmDA�0
c, i✓ /oo` PF,E #72' of TAE
Al 233' PARCEL NO: 3) 301 /S, 311 0.2-A-1008- 60
VARIANCE SPECIAL EXCEPTION
(SIA,'CZ FAiriiLY�
This property is currentlyy used for RES%D€NOS and has been used
continuously since /y6
SPECIAL EXCEPTION 67vj
NOTE: Special exception use permits are granted in the
discretion of the . Board of Adjustment Committee. The are made
available to validate uses which, while not approved within the
zoning district in question, are deemed to be compatible with
approved uses and/or not found to be hazardous , harmful ,
offensive or otherwise adverse to other uses, subject to review
by the circumstances and the imposition of conditions, subject to
the provisions of the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance.
If it is your belief that a special exception use permit should
be granted to you for the above-described property, please set
forth, in detail, the intended use of the property and your
justification in applying for such a permit:
,/�UPCEX �'EiUTi9L USE. �i9CN F�-v02 �/�u�-/� BE H S��/�LE'
1
(A1,q J-X0 0 T
• fi/'A2T/7'IFiUT�>Tf� � SF�A�AT� ,�iVT�C'��EX DTs. T'`JE �A/y>.t/>.t/�
Z)2 A*AA/3' 127,!e41C qJ aFrieE All PT FA-1TAL 01VI-e tA5V
FX2 ro w sr,LoA wAy hrousz-, Fol?/'19.? 17,5 o f .57TC2U/,t
AER-4-72V A Aooes E q5; /S Da pi- X OF 51mi cA2 .tAyaal m Sv$✓EcT
VARIA✓�1 ��r�oss � srl��F:�s T.s�� ��.2ic y�noiv� ��✓��>c; ro so61�15
VARIANCE vg�Ay]�C,e�ig6�,
NOTE: Variances from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may
be applied for only where, owing to special conditions, a literal
enforcement of the Ordinance will result in an "unnecessary
hardship" which is defined, in the Zoning Ordinance as meaning
"an unusual or extreme decrease in the adaptability of the
property to the uses permitted by the zoning district, which is
caused by facts, such as rough terrain or good soil conditions,
uniquely applicable to the particular piece of property as
distinguished from those applicable to most or all property in
the same zoning district". If you believe that under the facts
and circumstances unique to your property a variance could be
granted to you, under the definition cited above, please set for
both the type of variance which you are requesting and the
reasons that you have for making the request.
The section below is to be completed by the Zoning Office.
A ' Variance/special Exception use permit is requested as
authorized' by Section
OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES:
THE APPLICANT, AS WITNESSED BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,
HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE HAS READ AND THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THE
FOLLOWING:
1. Go to Township for approval and have Township send letter to
the Zoning Office stating their position on your request.
2. Applicants must submit a site plan showing distances from
property lines, roads, and/or water.
3. Applicants are to submit a list of adjoining property owners
including those directly across the road and their addresses.
2
4 . Applicants will be heard by the Board of Adjustment
committee. After a public hearing on the application, at which
time testimony and arguments will be received, the Committee will
adjourn to view the sites in question after which time they will
reconvene to render decisions. However, the applicant should not
consider the decision to be final until written notice of the
decision has been presented to him.
5. At the public hearing the applicant may appear in person or
through an agent or an attorney of his choice. The
applicant/agent/attorney may present testimony and evidence and
arguments in support of his application.
6. The fact that an application for a permit has been filed does
not 'automatically mean that a permit is granted. If you are
uncertain as to how to present your case you may want to consider
the advise of legal counsel.
+ 7. The fee assessed for this application is nonrefundable.
8. All site plans, pictures, and etc. become property of the
Zoning Office and will remain in your file.
9. Statements of representatives of the Board of Adjustment made
to you concerning matters of whether the Committee can, will, or
will not grant the permits you seek are understood to constitute
the opinions of those representatives. Staff are not empowered
to act on behalf or instead of the Board of Adjustment Committee.
10. Applications must be returned to the Zoning Office by the end
of the month prior to the month of the next regular meeting.
Board of Adjustment meetings are held the fourth Thursday of
every month.
Any assistance in the filling out of this application will be
provided you by a representative of the St. Croix County Zoning
Office at your request.
q q
DATE:
SIGNED:
Applicant/Agent
Owner
8/90 cj
3
W
loo/ 7S
A-
I l
S �
51
i
b 2�
�o o'