Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
026-1017-30-090 (2)
o ° °o• °o o 0 °� � � c N c c c � 0 0 o 2 c m m °o o�°p I C:) I N y f0 O ° a Q c ° C O d m m U aza o c a� c w c D.(D n E •E o rn mz m m I ZS � C 7 O c0 N i — c L L m.o > E 300 CL y S O L O co CD O (D Zi N O .0 OO Z N LL c a.y co m O '0 O O-- 0 E N t o c c=_ -6 E 3 �' Q L Ln Q U d 3 3� '3 CV z m W z o o v ° ° Z Cl) z l a m a m LO o z c c u o w o N C c E N N N C N N N • -: N N O O O N O a L d U O o O z z z z m z 6 Z° C z 0 N O c i0 c A .. N .. m E C m £ > > > m > y y c0 > y y m CL CL m U 1 c o U aCa d i N cn c H N i cU N j ° Goa a �, ° 'coa a m an. .W2 as •N asaa CL m (D CL z z ►� 7 p tin (o O 0) (0 ~ r Cn J U rn w Z � CD � I N N +-. M U rn U E O O O O J m m c Co Q z UI c0 O ° I�I1 C d N C oCOD Oco ° U N U N 'D m O c CL C) O � 2 ° m E N E C �Q ago O m c m N m C :: N ,Cy :3 N • 7� N m U') ° U) m ° m N ° N ° m EC U 0 C) J Cl) O — = z J O O z cn V d d a m a m dt a L: a >. L: a >. I CL '� • m d m c� O /7- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN The Application of: DECISION Philip & Pat LaVenture File No. 48-92 A hearing was held in the above referenced matter on July 23, 1992 before the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, Chairperson Bernard Kinney and members, George Sinclear, Robert Stephens, John Bradley, and George Menter. The applicant, Philip & Pat LaVenture, whose address is 1035 Hwy. 64, New Richmond, WI 54017, requests a special exception use permit pursuant to section 15.03(3) of the St. Croix County zoning ordinance for the following described parcel of land, which applicant_owns loca the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 Section 5, T30N- c R19W, TownTf Somerset, t. Croix Co. Wisconsin. The applicant proposes to construct a demolition site. FINDINGS OF FACT (1. ) Demolition landfills are special exceptions by the County ordinance. (2. ) Clean demolition material is being disposed of. (3. ) The township supports the proposal. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Board of Adjustment has the authority to grant special exceptions as per 17.70(7) of the County Zoning Ordinance. DECISION Based on the finding of fact and conclusions of law, the application of Philip & Pat LaVenture for a special exception use permit is conditionally approved with the following conditions: 1. Be limited to the acres in size. 2. Clean demolition Val. i 3. Reclaim site in an environmentally safe way. NAME YES/NO Voting: John Bradlely yes Bernard Kinney yes George Menter yes Robert Stephens yes Jerome Neuman yes This decision expires after one year from the date of the decision. If the proposal is not commenced within that time, a new application must be submitted and approved before proceeding with the proposal. If the proposal is not completed within that time, an extension of the decision must be obtained. This decision may be revoked by the Board, after notice and hearing, if any condition of the decision is violated. This decision may be appealed by any person aggrieved by the decision by filing with the St. Croix County Circuit Court an action for certiorari within 30 days of the date of filing this decision. Applicant assumes all risk of relying on this decision within the 30 day appeal period. Off. D., John Bradley , Chairman Filed: DATE: Aug. 26, 1992 ^� -p O y 3 0 op Oq N a p C E N o A2 cv N p @- E'3 (9 m 0_ o E p ti mg t� TYa �C oU 3 0 0 0.0 D E —L) D r 0. o ° E= m crn � I M N C y c C N ° _ 3 co < O m `Q LL 0 ° c c 0 V;m T X.X 0 N Q �na�UN I Q) a�o W Z E Z G L zam o z :r co F- v p — aEi N a rn p Q 0 C n • N f N 0 c3 (6 N 0 Z m Z Z o N Cz I a C - v Q w L c N p G O G a Z N > U F- M ° d a 0 0 0 CD a !' Z psi', 0) o-, N �1 0 � C E 0 0 Q _ M a xs M Q t7a m O p _ _ y) N m a 30 L � � O @ E to rO ° o H Q N a`) c U d V O ^ °r c c c m o C ° o E t° = �' 0 0 cy)~ co M U M -A C3 O C U p it G ti CL a v u .. E .c c r A L)a '', in u - Form - STC - 104 // AS BUILT SANITARY SYSTEM REPORT OWNER 2a `��LL6 TOWNSHIP S-- SEC. _ T N-R0(t_W ADDRESS ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN SUBDIVISION LOT LOT SIZE PLAN VIEW Distances and dimensions to meet requirements of IIHR 83 SHOW EVERYTHING WITHIN 100 FEET OF SYSTEM 1 , I 4 INDICATE NORTH ARROW t i BENCHMARK: Describe the vertical reference point used � d��i A, i Elevation of vertical reference point: � p �1i,G Proposed slope at site: SEPTIC TANK: Manufacturer 1 7 Liquid Capacity: Number of rings used: Tank manhole cover elevation: 7,19 Tank Inlet Elevation: Tank Outlet Elevation: 9j�jy Number of feet from nearest Road: Front,Side 0 Rear, O :� feet i From nearest property line Front,®Side,O Rear,0 ',=2e_2 feet �)� building: / Number of feet from: well �'7`' ' ng: (Include this information of the above plot plan)( 2 reference dimensions to septic tank) SEE REVERSE SIDE PUMP CHAMBER Manufacturer: Liquid Capacity: Pump Model: Pump/Siphon Manufacturer: Pump Size Elevation of inlet: Bottom of tank elevation: Pump off switch elevation: Gallons per cycle: Alarm Manufacturer: Alarm Switch Type: Number of feet from nearest property line: Front, O Side, O Rear,0 Ft. Number of feet from well: Number of feet from building: (Include distances on plot plan). SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM Bed: XV Trench: i Width: / Length: 0/ Number of Lines:�_ Area Built: Fill depth to top of pipe: Number of feet from nearest property line: Fro t, ©Side, O Rear,O Ft l Number of feet from well: . Number of feet from building: r/j 7 (Include distances on plot plan). SEEPAGE PIT Size: Number of pits: Diameter: Liquid depth: Bottom of seepage pit elevation: Area Built: Has either a drop box O or distribution box O been used on any of the above soil absorbtion sytems? (Check one). HOLDING TANK Manufacturer: Capacity: Number of rings used: Elevation of bottom of tank: Elevation of inlet: Number of feet from nearest property line: Front, O Side,O Rear, 0Ft. Number of feet from well: Number of feet from building: Number of feet from nearest road: Alarm Manufacturer: Inspector: Dated: —�, _�� Plumber on job: S' License Number: 3/84:m,j I- IDEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, INSPECTION REPORT FOR SAFETY&BUILDINGS LABOR&HUMAN RELATIONS PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEMS DIVISION P.O.BOX 7969 BUREAU OF PLUMBING MADISON,WI 53707 NW ,NW ,S5,T30N-R18W MCONVENTIONAL -]ALTERNATIVE Siren.Number Town of Richmond ❑Holding Tank ❑In-Ground Pressure ❑Mound I NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER: ADDRESS OF PERMIT HOLDER: INSPECTION DATE: Phil LaVenture Route 5, New Richmond, WI 54017 9_C3I5_97 A): 3ci e MAR (Pvmamm reference P-0 DESCRI E IF DIFFERENT FROM PLAN: I REF.PT.ELEV.: CST REF.PT.ELEV.: 1 1 t jj� Name of Plumber: I MP/MPRSW No.: rn,y: Sanitary IINI Number: 92536 Calvin Powers, Jr. 1563 St. Croix SEPTIC TA /HOLDING TANK: MANUFACTU E LIQUID CAPACITY: TANK INLET ELEV.: TANK OUTLET ELEV.. A NI IOCKING COVFR r I O D ^ , 9 O IDES PROVIDED: � f�S Cty�P JN, � i -95. �(J�'�' '7[ lJ•j YES NO 1:1 YES O BEDDING: VENT DIA.: VENT MA HIGH WA NUMBER OF ROAD: ROPPER WELL: UILOING: V N F - �1 �Re"' FEET FROM O O t 0 0-/- AIR INLET. OYES NO 1T ❑Y NO NEAREST o((/ 'J` DOSING CHAMBER: MANUFACTURER: BEDDING: LIQUID CAPACITY; P EL. PUMP/SIPHON MANUFACTURER: WARNING LABEL LOCKING COVER PROVIDED: PROVIDED: OYES ONO OYES ONO ❑YES -IN GALLONS PER CYCLE: uM AN ONT LS ERA IONAL; NUMBER OF PROPERTY IWELL' JOUILDING IVENTTOFRESP (DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FEET FROM LINE AIR INLET PUMP ON AND OFF) YES ❑NO NEAREST SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM.CheckthesOilm IS.-structio.tureatthe pth, ,plowing LENGTH [IAMETER MATERIAL AND MARKING or excavation, (If soil can be rolled into a wire shall cease until FORCE the soil is dry enough to continue.) MAIN CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM: WIDTH: LENGTH: NO.OF STR.PIPE SPACINGT. D JINSIOE DIA =PITS LIOUID BED/TRENCH I / TRENCHES ) PIT / /" DEPTH j DIMENSIONS O f OL, RAVEL P H ILL OEP H UISTR.PI F DISTR.PIPE IS R.PIPE MA RIAL: NUMBER OF PRO E iV WEL BUILDING: V NT TO FgESH BELOW PIPES: BUVE COVER E EV.INLET ELEV.ENO: _ Q LI E AIR IN ET11-J. 9316 Z J FEET FROM JET Tt NEAREST U MOUND SYSTEM- Mound site plowed perpendicular to slope Check the texture of the fill material for PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OFSYSTEM and furrows thrown upslope: mound systems to make certain that it ON REVERSE SIDE.SHOW ELEVA- ❑YES ONO meets the criteria for medium sand. TIONS MEASURED. IL VER TEXTURE' PERMANENT MARKERS OBSERVATION WELLS DYES : NO ❑YES ONO DEPTH OVER TRENCHMED jOFPTH OVER TREN H/BEO DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. [ODOED SEEDED FULCHID CENTER: EDGES: ❑ _ ❑ ❑YES NO OYES ONO DYES NO PRESSURIZED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: BED/TRENCH WIDTH LENGTH NO.ENCHES LATERAL SPACING GRAVEL DEPTH BELOW PIPE FILL DEPTH ABOVE COVER DIMENSIONS MANIFOLD PUMP MANIFOLD JDISTR,PIPE MANIFOLD MATERIAL INODISTH, D R.PIPE UISTHIBUTION IPE MATERIAL&MARKING ELEVATION AN ELEV.: ELEV.: DIA_: ELEV.: PIPES ' DISTRIBUTION HOLE_SIZE HOLE SPACING: DRILLED CORRECTLY COVER MATERIAL VERTICAL LIFT CORRESPONDS TO APPROVED INFORMATION PLANS YE ❑NO ❑YES ONO COMMENTS: PERMANENT MA K RS: OBSERVATION WELLS: NUMBER OF PROPERTY WELL: BUILDING: FEET FROM LINE: OYES C]NO ❑YES ONO INEAREST \ D , �z Sketch System on r_._._..�;' �/�,r Retain in county file for audit. Reverse Side. Aii; - TI E DILHR SBD6710(R.01/82) � �;!,r4"'l lz oning Administrato DILHR SANITARY PERMIT APPLICATION COUNTY D/ In accord with ILHR 83.05,Wis.Adm.Code STA SANITARY PERMIT# —Attach complete plans(to the county copy only)for the system,on paper not less than STATE PLAN I.D.NUMBER 8'f x 11 inches in size. —See reverse side for instructions for completing this application. PETITION � 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION—PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION. FOR VARIANCE ❑YES C j NO PROP TZWNER PR PERTY L ATIO Y, %,S N, R E(or PRO ERTY OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS OT NU ER BL CK UMBER SUBDIVISI NAME CI ,ST E ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBEF3 CITY NEARE T ROAD,LAK OR LANDMARK VILLAGE: TOWN OF' IL TYPE OF BUILDING OR USE SERVED: Number of Bedrooms if 1 or 2 Family OR X Public(Sp ify): 111. PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: (Check only one in#1. Check#2,3 or 4,if applicable 1. a. X New b.❑ Replacement c. ❑Replacement of d.❑ Fteconnection of e.❑ Repair of an System System Septic Tank Only i in Existing System Existing System 2. ❑ A Sanitary Permit was previously issued. Permit## Date Issued 3. ❑ An Existing System has been inspected and soil conditions meet miniff um requirements. 4. ❑ The System is shared by more than one owner/building. Attach Common Ownership Agreement to County Copy. IV. TYPE OF SYSTEM: (Check only one in#1 and only one in#2) 1. a. ®Conventional b. ❑Alternative c. ❑Experimental 2. a. ❑System- b. ❑ Holding c.❑ Pit Privy d.❑ Vault Privy e.❑ Mound f. ❑ IGP In-Fill Tank V. ABSORPTION SYSTEM INFORMATION: (Check one) 1. a. 0 Seepage Bed . b. ❑Seepage Trench c. ❑See a e Pit 2. PERCOLATION RATE 3. ABSORPTION AREA 4. ABSORPTION AREA 5. YSTEM ELEVATION 6.WATER SUPPLY: (Minutes per inch): REQUIRED(Square Feet): PROPOSED(Square Feet): Feet ®Private ❑Joint ❑ Public VI. TANK CAPACITY Site in gallons Total #of Prefab. Fiber- Exper. ' INFORMATION New stin Gallons Tanks Manufacturer's Name oncret Con- Steel glass Plastic App Tanks Tanks strutted Septic Tank or Holdina Tank Lift Pump Tank/Siphon Chamber VII. RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT I,the undersigned,assume responsibility for installation opff&yrilate sewage system shown on the attached plans. Plu ber's Name(Pr"nt): PI b is ignat e: o S ps) MP/MPRSW No.: Business Phone Number.r. j Plu er s ddress SVeet,Ci State,Zip Code: Name of Designer 1. SOIL TEST INFORMATION Ce 1 Tester( Name CST# CST's RESS(S set,City, ip Code) Phone Number: IX. COUNTY/DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Disapproved Sanitary Permit Fee Groundwater a e IsWOAA nt Signature(No Stamps) PO L( Approved ❑ Owner Given Initial tZlIcharge Fee �,Adverse Det rmination ✓ . f X. COMMENTS/REASONS FOR DISAPPROVAL: SBO-6398(formerly Plb-67)(R.03/86) DISTRIBUTION: Original to County,One Copy To:Bureau of Plumbing,Owner,Plumber 17 44 le Z4 97, Pup n GDS of5-ice yC ,C.( y'9,ff 7a� E�/aj! m i EXHIBIT R closed session for the purpose of deliberating on the appeals, pursuant to Sec. 19.85(1) (a) , Wisconsin Statutes, and will reconvene into open session for the purpose of voting on the appeals. 1. ARTICLE: 17.64(5)D Driveway separation APPELLANT: Dennis Ullom LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 22, T29N-R18W, Town of Warren 2. ARTICLE: 17.29(b) Filling & Grading/Pond APPELLANT: Heather Landin LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 22, T28N-R17W, Town of Rush River 3. ARTICLE: 17.64(2) Setback from Water APPELLANT: Cheryl C. Bunish LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 31, T31N-R18W, Town of Star Prairie 4. ARTICLE: 15.03(3) Demolitions Site APPELLANT: Jeff Lauck LOCATION: S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 5, T28N-R17W, Town of Somerset 5. ARTICLE: 17.29(b) Filling & Grading/River Crossing APPELLANT: John Afdahl LOCATION: SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 18, T28N-R17W, Town of Pleasant Valley 6. ARTICLE: 15.03(3) Demolition Site APPELLANT: Philip and Pat LaVenture LOCATION: Nth 1/4 0 th, 1/4 f Sec. 5, T30N-R18W, Town of(�omerset Cf��1 LG✓ 7. ARTICLE: 17.64(1)2 Road Setback APPELLANT: Dirk Linder LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 30, T29N-R18W, Town of Warren 8. ARTICLE: 17.36(5) (9) Sideyard setback 17.36(5) (c) Bluffline setback 17.64(1) (c) Town road setback APPELLANT: Daniel J. Greenwald LOCATION: Gov't Lot 1, Sec. 13, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy 9. ARTICLE: 17. 31(2) Setback from Water APPELLANT: Robert & Carol Benish LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 26, T30N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph 10. ARTICLE: 17.64(5)2 Driveway Separation APPELLANT: Tom Krohn/Milan Krohn BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING July 23, 1992 (This meeting was recorded by a court reporter) The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 8:00 A.M. Chairman Bradley explained the procedures of the hearing, requesting that individuals wishing to testify sign their names and addresses on the sheet in the front of the room. Supervisors Bradley, Stephens, Menter, Kinney and Neuman were all in attendance. Staff present was Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator Stephens made a motion to adopt the agenda as mailed. Menter seconded the motion. Motion carried. OLD BUSINESS PATRICK O'MALLEY Stephens expressed concern that O'Malley should reschedule as new business and properly published due to the local concerns. GREG DEROSIER Nelson stated that there had been recent complaints regarding the Greg Derosier body shop, when the complaints had been checked, the operations was found to' be compliant. JULIE SPEER Julie requested a one (1) year extension on her permit for a stairway leading down to the St. Croix river. Motion by Stephens, seconded by Menter to approve a one (1) year extension on the permit. Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS i The hearing was called to order at 8:30 A.M. Nelson read the notice of the hearing as published: The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public hearing for Thursday, July 23, 1992 at 8:30 A.M. in the County Board Room of the St. Croix County Courthouse, Hudson, Wisconsin to consider the following appeal to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An onsite investigation will be made of each site in questions, after which the board contemplates adjournment into access to farm fields. DNR and township support the proposal. PHILIP & PAT LAVENTURE Nelson stated that demolition land fills are special exceptions uses in the ordinance. LaVenture presented his request. This has been in operation for several years. The township of Richmond supports the proposal. DIRK LINDER Nelson stated that the request to build a 241x36' garage one hundred twenty (120) feet from the center of, the town road is a variance request of thirteen (13) feet. Linder stated that his location was needed due to topographic problems with the property. The township supports the proposal. DAN GREENWALD Nelson stated that this request was a variance of the setback from the bluffline, side yard setback, and setback off the town road. Greenwald presented his request stating that he needs additional storage space. Because of poor health he needs a tractor during the winter. This 241x24' building would store the tractor. TOM KROHN/MILAN KROHN Nelson stated that this was a variance for driveway separation on STH 35. The required distance is five hundred (500) feet. Dory Zoeller presented the request stating that a lot was being created and it could not meet the five hundred (500) foot separation. Upon completion of the hearings the members p p g of the Board of Adjustment visited the various properties that were in question after which they returned making the following decisions: DENNIS ULLOM Motion by Kinney, seconded by Menter to deny the requested variance as no hardship was evident. Access must meet the required separation for this parcel and any subsequential divisions. Motion carried unanimously. HEATHER LANDIN Motion by Stephens, seconded by Bradley to approve the request for constructing a pond. Motion carried unanimously. CHERYL BUNISH LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 13, T31N-R19W, Town of Somerset DENNIS ULLOM Nelson explained that Ullom was before the Board of Adjustment requesting a variance to the two hundred (200) foot driveway separation requirement. Dennis presented a site plan and explained that the two hundred (200) foot separation posed a hardship due to the topography. HEATHER LANDIN Nelson stated that this was a request to create a pond within the shore land-wetland district. This requires a special exception use permit. Jim Kline from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service presented plans showing details of the proposal. Bob Heise, Land Conservation, Chris Belling, Wildlife Manager, Gene Nelson, township supervisor, and Peter Paturkis all supported the proposal. Lloyd Weber Gladys Peterson and Cyril Cernohouse all expressed concerns for flood of the adjacent properties. CHERYL BUNISH Nelson stated that this was a request to build a deck closer to the Apple river than the allowable seventy-five (75) feet required. The Board of Adjustment should look at hardship rather than convenience. Bunish presented her request stating that there was a four (4) foot drop from the floor of the residence to the patio creating a danger when she wanted to use the patio. JEFF LAUCK Nelson stated that demolition land fills are special exception use permits in the ordinance. Lauck presented his request to construct a demolition landfill for concrete, sand, dirt and cement blocks on an area of about one (1) acre. Henry Holcomb expressed concerns for surface water drainage in the area. The township of somerset supports the proposal. JOHN "DAHL Nelson stated that a river crossing is a special exception in the shoreland district. Afdahl presented his plan showing the need of a river crossing for Motion by Stephens, seconded by Neuman to approve the variance for the deck closer to the water. role call vote: Kinney, No; Bradley, No; Stephens, Yes; Menter, Yes; Neuman, Yes. Motion carried three to two. JEFF LAUCK Motion by Stephens, seconded by Neuman to approve the demolition landfill with the following conditions: 1. Use be limited to owner and renter of building. 2. Demolition material be clean fill. 3. Reclaim the site as its covered. 4. Obtain DNR approval. Motion carried. JOHN AFDAHL Y Motion by Bradley, seconded by Kinney to approved the river crossing. Motion carried. PHILIP & PAT LAVENTURE Motion by Stephens, seconded by Neuman to approve the demolition landfill with the following conditions: 1. Demolition material be clean fill. 2. Reclaim the site as its covered. 3. Obtain DNR approval. DIRK LINDER Motion by Menter, seconded by Stephens to approve the setback variance request. Motion carried. DAN GREENWALD Motion by Bradley, seconded by Stephens to deny the variance request for a storage shed. This request is for a convenience not hardship. The septic system is in the way of the construction and driveway. Motion carried to deny. TOM KROHN Motion by Neuman, seconded by Stephens to approve a driveway separations seventy-five (75) feet North of the South property corner of lot number two (2) . Motion carried. Stephens made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Bradley. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, - ZU2�� 1__~ George Menter TCN:cj