Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
020-1170-80-000
~visconsin Department of Commerce Division of Safety and Buildings SOIL EVALUATION REPORT in acx:ordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code #1602 Page 1 of 4 Schmitt Soil Testing, Inc. County Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8% x 11 inches in size . st St. Croix include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (B direction percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and dista nearest ro arcel I.D. ' 020-117o-saooo Please print all info te R iewed D f ` Personal information you provide may be for 14~IA1~ rivacy , s. 15.04 (1) (m)). ~, ~~ ~ vii-'~ Property Owner 0$ roperty Loption Anderson, Dan 6 ~~ ovt. Lot SE1/4, NW1/4, S7, T29N, R19W Properly Owners Mailing Address LINTY ~~ t # Blodc # Subd. Name or CSM# 335 Edgewood Dr CRpIX ,92,93 Edgewood Estates City State Zi Code Z ^ City ^ Village ~ Town Nearest Road Hudsonnn WI 16 Hudson Edgewood Drive ^ New Construction Use: ^ Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 Code derived design flow rate 450 ., GPD Replacement ^ Public or commercial -Describe: ~~ Parent material Glacial till (Amery Series) m e a ion, ' applicab a na ft., General cemments y ~ ~~ ,~1'1.;~~`~d'f/ p and recommendations: R~ nd " mound. S ste~e evati~117.4' based off ntour line established at !!{{16.9' Slo a of area is 17%. Grading may have to be done to divert water around mound. Boring # ~ Boring ^ Pit Ground surface elev. 101.60 fl. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consisten Boundary Roots GP D/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-81 -------------- Baclfill material -------- ---- ---- ---- ------ Pit is in backfill material, it is along side of the Infiltrator chambers and directly over the perforated pipe in the original (bed) drainfield that was Boring # ~ Boring ~ Pit Ground surface elev. 106.95 ft. Depth to limiting factor 32 in. Soil Appl'~cation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consisten Boundary Roots GP D/ftz in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-5 10yr3/3 none sil 2mgr mvh- a 2c,2m .6 .8 2 5-14 10yr5/3 none sil lmpl mfr gw 2m,2f .4c .6 3 14-27 10yr5/6 none sil 2fsbk mfr gw 2f,2m .6 .8 4 27-32 10yr4/6 none sl lmsbk mfr gw 2m .4 .7 5 32-88 5yr4/4 none sl Om mfi gw --- .2 .6 Starting at 32", very dense sandy loam, restrictive layer. * EfFluent #1 = BODS> 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L * EfFluent #2 = BODS <_30 mg/L and TSS <_30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signature: CST Number Thomas J. Schmitt ~ 227429 Address Schmitt Soil Testing, Inc. Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1595 72nd Street New Richmond, WI 54017 $/5/200$ 715-247-2941 r- SBD-8330 (R.07/00) Property Owner Anderson, Dan Parcel ID # 020-1170-80-000 Page 2 of 4 Boring # ~ Boring h ~ pit Ground surface elev. 116.30 ft. Dept to limiting factor 39 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft~ in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#t *Eff#2 1 0-6 10yr3/4 none sil 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 .8 2 6-27 10yr5/3 none I 2msbk mvfr gw 2f,ivf .6 .8 3 27-39 10yr5/b none sil 2msbk mfr gw 2vf .6 .8 4 39-60 10yr5/6 none sl Om mfi cs 2m,2f .2 .6 5 60-104 7.5yr4/6 none sl Om mfi ---- ---- .2 .6 Starting at 39", very dense sandy loam, firm consistence. Restrictive layer. Boring # ~ Boring pit Ground surface elev. 116.30 ft. Depth to limiting factor 40" in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#'I *Eff#2 1 0-18 10yr3/4 none I 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 .8 2 18-26 10yr5/3 none sil 2fsbk mfr gw 2m,2f .6 .8 3 26-40 10yr4/6 none sl 2msbk mfr gw 2vf .6 1.0 4 40-53 10yr5/6 none sl Om mfi gw ---- .2 .6 5 53-96 5yr4/6 none sl Om mfi -- -- .2 .6 Starting at 40", very dense sandy loam, massive, restrictive layer. goring # ~ Boring pit Ground surface elev. 113.0 ft. Depth to limiting factor 36 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft~ in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Etf#1 *Eff#2 1 0-16 10yr3/3 none I 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 .8 2 16-26 10yr5/3 none I 2fsbk mfr gw 2m,2f .6 .8 3 26-36 10yr5/6 none sil 2msbk mfr ---- 2vf .6 .8 Shovel pit, didn't dig with backhoe to avoid disturbing soil. All other pits were already restrictive. * Effluent #1 = BODS> 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 <150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/Land TSS <30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD-8330 (R.OT100) Schmitt SON Tesiirg, Inc. Page 3 of 4 Conducted by: Conducted Far: Schmitt Soil `T`esting Tnc. Name: Dan & Shannon Anderson Thomas J. Schmitt, CST 227429 Address: 335 Edgewood Drive 1595 72nd St. City, State,. Zip: Hudson, WI 54016 New Richmond, WI.54017 Pho~: 715-247-2941 ~ Subd.Name: Edgewood Estates III sic _ _ Lot No.: 91, 92, & 93 ~ ~ I___~,___/ ~ct'C) ~' Legal Description: SE1/4 NWl/4 S7 T29N R19W ~ Baclchoe pit Township, County: Hudson, St. Croix ,~ Bench Mark EL 100:00' Top of inspection plug in cast iron pipe on first septic tank from house Q Alternate Bench Mark El. 1 i 7.70' Nail in 9" Poplar Tree Slope= 17% Contoux Lim EL 116.90' Contour Length 75' Seale 1" = 40' ~U9'e t,.Ip~ Qr,°~e 9~ ~7~ ~~' ~6~ t ~ ~ ~' '~~ 1 ~ ~'atic2 Lii/F ~~ i ~CL, ~/d , yo ~ ~~e~~ • ~ ~ ~ 1 6~ ~~}` ~' ij ~ e `r .~ Sk ~ ~ ~~ Y ~ ~ x~ ~h~ ~ ~. ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ / .~ _, ~: ~l // / / ~~ ~/ S~u~I-a, pr~4~~ Lt`NC` ~- /1C~ ~-e .~ ~ns~ /1~- b e Stare ytso ~it~~- ~l~-a,~. a y~ m~ s~'~e . ~d. Ar~IMS Viewer .. ~ ~ Page ~pf ~/ ~.~ ,~ s + fi _ _ ~. - 1 ~ . . _ .~ y - n ~~ _ ,` ,- FDGEWOOD SaC2 ~ 1 _. ~- ~ , ~ , z r+ http://www.landinfo.co.saint-Croix.wi.us/website/LRPorta.UARCIMS/MapFrame.asp?PIN= 7/29/2008 ;:: SAFETY AND BUILDINGS '+. 13 E SPRUCE ST SUITE 106 commerce.wi.gov ti,~ CHIPPEWA FALLS WI 54729 ^ Contact Through Relay www. commerce.wi. gov/sb/ onsin NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS AND ORDERS www.wisconsin.gov Department of Commerce Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary January 20, 2010 CUST ID No.: 227990 Phone: 715/386-3121 WILLIAM C SCHUMAKER 1070 SCOTT RD HUDSON WI 54016 TRANSACTION No.: 1760531 RECEIVED JAN 2 7 2010 $T, CROIX GQUNTY PIANNING 8 ZONING QFFIGE Site. ID No.: 751022 Site Address: 335 Edgewood Dr, Hudson WI 54016 SE %4, NW %<, Section 7, T29N, R19W Lots 91-92, Edgewood Estates III St. Croix County, Town of Hudson PIN 020-1170-80-000 Sanitary Permit Number 430503 -Issued 11/04/2003 Regulated Objects: Nature of Complaint Summary: Onsite system hydraulically failed in four years. Improper installation verified. Object Type: Complaint Regulated Object ID No.: 1254243 INVESTIGATION NOTES: St. Croix County has issued two sanitary permits for the conventional below grade systems to serve this home. One was issued in 1986 for a new system and in 2003 a permit was issued for a replacement system. According to the owner, the system began surface discharging at the end of the cell closest to the home when the pump dosed. wastewater to the dispersal cell. Both cells were reported to be severely ponded with effluent. The surface discharge of partially treated domestic wastewater has periodically created a human health hazard as defined in s. 254.01(2), Wis. Stats. In my opinion, the reasons for the premature failure of the system are two fold. The first reason is that the newer dispersal cell is installed in fill and partially over an older cell installed in 1986. The horizontal separation between distribution cells as specified in the component design manual for this type of system is three feet. At this site the systems overlap by 2-3 feet. A county inspector has provided a witness statement as to the conditions she observed and those observations confirm my conclusion that the two systems overlap each other. When compared in fact, the plumber's own records of the two installations show the overlap exactly as observed by the county inspector. The infiltrative characteristics of fill material are often unpredictable and therefore questionable and such conditions are not allowed below a standard conventional below grade system. The second reason for premature failure is that the certified soil tester failed to recognize massive sandy loam glacial till as a limitation to infiltration and thus assigned an incorrect soil application rate that was later used to design the dispersal cell. A recent soil evaluation by another certified soil tester indicates that the soil morphology and estimated soil application rate reported by Adam Schumaker (CST 253309) is incorrect. In support of this conclusion, the detailed soil survey for this area shows the soil series for this area to consist largely of massive sandy loam at the depth the system was installed. Massive soil conditions are typically more slowly permeable and require much larger systems to work correctly. In this case, the area of the system would need to be 250% larger to meet code minimum standards. Under normal use the soil dispersal cells were overloaded with wastewater because they were too small and stayed moist to wet almost constantly promoting intense biomat development early on in the system's life cycle. This resulted in hydraulic failure of the cells. A second inspection of the installation was conducted on May 27, 2009, and served to confirm previous reports by the county and Tom Schmitt regarding the locations of the 1986 and 2003 dispersal cells as overlapping. This DEPARTMENT ORDER is issued as a result of an inspection on the above referenced site. WILLIAM C SCHUMAKER Page 2 1/20/2010 The following violations were revealed: 1. Domestic wastewater is occasionally discharged to the ground surface. Comm 83.32 (1)(f), Wis. Adm. Code prohibits the final discharge of domestic wastewater or effluent to the ground surtace. The owner is currently maintaining the septic/dose tanks as a holding tank with off site disposal at considerable expense in order to abate a human health hazard. 2. At least one dispersal cell constructed in 2003 is not installed over in-situ (natural) soil as required by Section IV, Subsection A, Conventional Soil Absorption Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems SBD-10567-P (R.6/99). Designs andlor installation not in compliance with an approved component manual are considered in violation of s. Comm 83.61, Wis. Adm. Code. 3. The western most dispersal cell installed in 2003 is not at least three feet from an adjacent cell as required by Table 3 in the Conventional Soi! Absorption Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems SBD-10567-P (R.6l99). Designs and/or installation not in compliance with an approved component manuai are considered in violation of s. Comm 83.61, Wis. Adm. Code. 4. Based on documentation by certified soil tester Thomas J. Schmitt, CST 227429, and the St. Croix County detailed soil survey, there is sufficient evidence that the dispersal cells designed and installed in 2003 were not large enough to operate correctly under the normal flows from a 3-bedroom home. The dispersal area was designed at a 0.50 gpd/ftZ soil application rate but should have been designed at a 0.20 gpd/ftZ rate. This discrepancy would have increase the dispersal cell size by 250%. This is a violation of s. Comm 83.44(4)(a)1.c. and (c), Wis. Adm. Code, and Table 2 (Minimum area of distribution cell) Conventional Soil Absorption Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems SBD- Corrective Actions Required: The owner shall continue to service the tanks at a frequency to prevent the surface discharge of domestic wastewater. 2. A code compliant private onsite wastewater treatment system shall be installed as weather conditions permit by the compliance date referenced below. You are hereby ordered to have the installation corrected at your own expense to conform to the indicated provisions of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and/or Wisconsin Statutes. These corrections shall be done by a properly licensed plumber, as required under s. 145.06(1) ~ (2), Stats. This installation shall be corrected by the compliance date noted below, and upon correction of violations 1 must be notified. If you fail to comply, this order is enforceable in circuit court pursuant to s. 145.02(3)(f), Stats., with forteitures ranging from $10 to $1000 per day for each violation, pursuant to s. 145.12(4}, Stats., and you may also be subject to a license action under s. 145.10(1), Stats. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at the number or a-mail listed below. INSPECTOR NAME: Lero G. Jansk INITIAL INVESTIGATION DATE: 09/11/2008 PHONE/WORK HOURS: (715)726-2544 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 .m. SECONDARY INVESTIGATION DATE: 05/27/2009 E-MAIL: lero .~ansk Wisconsin. ov INVESTIGATION TYPE: Com taint SIGNATURE: DATE: 1/25/10 INVESTIGATION SOURCE: Other ,j,/ COMPLIANCE DATE: 06/01!2010 /~' Fee Re uired: na PTO Ex Tres: na V cc: Owner St. Croix County Zoning Wlsconsln Department of Commerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM Safety and Building Division • INSPECTION REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) Personal information you provide maybe used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: Anderson, Dan W. & Shannon City Village X Township Hudson, Town of CST BM Elev: Insp. BM Elev: BM Description: TANK IN FORMATION TYPE MANUFACTURER CAPACITY Septic Dosing Aeration Holding TANK SETBACK INFORMATION TANK TO P/L WELL BLDG. Vent to Air Intake ROAD Septic Dosing Aeration Holding PUMP/SIPHON INFORMATION Manufacturer Demand GPM Model Number TDH Lift Friction Loss System Head TDH Ft Forcemain Length Dia. Dist. to Well SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM ELEVATION DATA County: St. Croix Sanitary Permit No: 515171 0 State Plan ID No: Parcel Tax No: 020-1170-80-000 Section/Town/Range/Map No: 07.29.19.1063 STATION BS HI FS ELEV. Benchmark Alt. BM Bldg. Sewer St/Ht Inlet SUHt Outlet Dt Inlet Dt Bottom Header/Man. Dist. Pipe Bot. System Final Grade St Cover BED/TRENCH Width Length No. Of Trenches PIT DIMENSIONS No. Of Pits Inside Dia. Liquid Depth DIMENSIONS SETBACK SYSTEM TO P/L BLDG WELL LAKE/STREAM LEACHING Manufacturer: INFORMATION CHAMBER OR Type Of System: UNIT Model Number: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Header/Manifold Distribution x Hole Size x Hole Spacing Vent to Air Intake Pipe(s) Length Dia Length Dia Spacing SOIL COVER x Pressure Systems Only zx Mound Or At-Grade Systems OnIV Depth Over Depth Over xx Depth of xx Seeded/Sodded xx Mulched Bed/Trench Center Bed/Trench Edges Topsoil Yes ~ No ~ Yes ~ No COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies, persons present, etc.) Inspection #1: / / Inspection #2: / /_ Location: 335 Edgewood Drive Hudson, WI 54016 (SE 1/4 NW 1/4 7 T29N R19W) Edgewood Estates III Lot 91,92&93 Parcel No: 07.29.19.1063 1.) Alt BM Description = 2.) Bldg sewer length = -amount of cover = Plan revision Required? !-! Yes r~ No - - Use other side for additional information. __ _ _ ______ ___ __ __ __.. _ ~_._- J__ Date Insepctor's Signature Cert. No. SBD-6710 (R.3/97) BOARD OF REVIEW CHANGES - PERSONAL PROPERTY SIGNATURE OF PERSON REQUESTING CHANGE MUNICIPALITY _ ___ COMPUTER # CODE ACRES LAND IMPROV TOTAL NAME COMPUTER # NAME COMPUTER # NAME -,---- *********************************************************************** COMPUTER # NAME ~*~**~c*******************~*****~**************************************~ COMPUTER # NAME COMPUTER # NAME commerce.wi.gov Safety and Buildings Division county ~ ~ 201 W. Washington Ave., P.O. Box 7162 St. Croix ~~~ n ~' ~ Madison, WI 53707-7162 Sanitary Permit Number (to be filled in by Co.) Department of Commerce ~! ~ ! "~ c~~~+~~r "^r-'wit ,pplication tl rL 111l~1t 1 ~Il lla L State Transaction Number ' ,Q ~ ~©~ ~ In accordance with s. Comm. 83.21(2), Wis. Adm. Code, submission of this form to the appropriate governmental u unit is required prior to obtaining a sanitary permit. Note: Application forms for state-owned POWTS aze project Address (if different than mailing address) submitted to the Department of Commerce. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary Same u oses in accordance with the Privac Law, s. 15.04 1 m , I. A lication Information -Please Print All Inf Property Owner's Name Parcel # 020-1170-80-000 Dan & Shannon Anderson Property Owner's Mailing Address '~+ 335 Ed ewood Drive UN I Y Property Location f ~~ (`' ~ _T g ~ i ~r.uiX UU PLANNING 8 ZONING OFFICE Govt. Lot City, State Zip Code Phone Number SE'/<,NW'/<, Section 7 Hudson, WI 54016 (715) 381-8138 (circle one) R 19 W T 29 N II. Type of Building (check all that apply) Lot # ; ®1 or 2 Family Dwelling -Number of Bedr ms 4 Subdivision Name 91, 92, 93 Plat of Edgewood Estates ^ Block # Public/Commercial -Describe Use Na City of ^ State Owned -Describe Use CSM Number ^ Village of Na ®Town of Hudson III. Type of Permit: (Check only one box on line A. Complete line B if applicable) A' New System Replacement Treatmeni/Holding Tank Replacement Only Other Modification to Existing System (explain) System l1GP~A•C(, t~i°; f_ t~SGL ~ ~~~s 2 . ( B. ^ Permit Permit Revision ^ Change of ^ Permit Transfer to Previous Permit Number and Date Issued List 9 ~ - Renewal Before Plumber New Owner ~ / $ 3~Y~ Ex iration ~ IV. T e of POWTS S stem/Corn onent/Device: Check all that a 1 Non-Pressurized In-Ground ^ Pressurized In-Ground ^ At-Grade ®Mound > 24 in. of suitable l soil ^ Mound < 24 in. of suitable soi ^ Holding Tank ^ Other Dispersal Component (explain) ^ Pretreatment Device (explain) ~ - ~ ` ~ _ ~/X ~O ~ ~~~ (~'h,/Owv ~ I ~O • ~ V. Dis ersal/Treatment Area Information: 'L Design Flow (gpd) Design Soil Appl' ion Rate(gpdsf) Dispersal Area Re fired (sf) Dispersal Area Propos (sf) System Elevation 600 0.60 ~~ ~ I 600.00 sq.ft. /bob 630.00 sq. ft. 117.40' 6" above ' .p Z/ 116.90 contour VI. Tank Info Capacity in Total # of Manufacturer w Gallons Gallons Units ~ ~ Q o r U v a a N H New Tanks Existing Tanks "" ~ ~ ~ ~ m .Qa Septic or Holding Tank 0 100,}200 2200 2 Wieser Concrete ^ ^ ^ ^ Dosing Chamber ~ $OQ 800 1 Wieser Concrete VII. Responsibility Statement- I, the undersigned, assume responsibility for installation of the POWTS shown on the attached plans. Plumber's Name (Print) Plumber's Signature MP/MPRS Number Business Phone Number Bill Schumaker ! ,~'~> • 227990 (715) 386-3121 Plumber's Address (Street, Ciry, State, Zip Code) 1070 toff Road, Hudson, WI 54016 VI . Coun /De artment Use Onl - Approved _ Disapproved Permit Fee Dat Issued I ing Age t Sign Owner Given Reason for Denial $ /~ ~~ 4'aj ~ ~ ~0 /~~ f' • (E ~ ~ / h IX. Conditions of A rovaUReasons for Disapproval ~ 1,..-, ~^ ~,~( SYSTEM OW l~~R: ~ ~ N~. 7'r~''C.J~- `` ~~~~~ 1 Septic tank, effluent filter and ~ ` ''~' ~ dispersal cell must all be serviced /maintained ~ i / - ~~~Y~, '~ - as per management plan provided by plumber. i -,~- ,~ j~ exc. w,~w 2. All setback requirements must be maintained . 33 d5 per apput;dr~i~{~q,~~bi~lEth'~an~ for the system and submit to~the County only on paper not less than 8 1/z z 11 inches in size SBD-6398 (R. 01107) Valid thru 01/09 ~ ~~ ~~ aa t`U // // S' Y c o a:~ R ~1 ~ ` ~ ~i-i~ U/ ~ ~6J~lV~ ~ ~ ~. Q ~ \ ~ ~ ~ Q v `Z 1 O o ,, y' r~~ a~~ ~ ~~~a~,~ • ~ ~° Yd9e~~ ~r~ve ~, _ ~'eys'E''"- ~}"' - ~ ` ~ Pr'opos~.d n(ou.nd c~.t 31.89;r~cb ~4y _• ~ ~~ distr,fic~~Eian /a,~u.Isa-~ 11~XGQ~d" -- ----.- ~ ~. ~Y~t'o+"if%easS°accdatLS~' -- - '. ' ~, f ~. ~' //G .O. :' /~ ~"' `~~. ~ //11.0. /~~ // / - / f ~A `, - - - - --. ____ _, ,Lod ~3 -~ Ufa e: /"i/I,S~t d~r~4 Q G GpoIS o,F' -/7o'oF1 ".sc.(• s!O!? /G .~o~rK/ti/1. .CoC 9•L ~,,,d {y d/v~~ Su~~ ce uk~~ n%'spvsa/Cc/% fr ~c aG EXi.'sf.,:, w ~u fcn~c.I' 1, 2~/~ corr6.~..~lc~, Sr~~o, c ' ' r..~/ ~3'Urc? ~'~/~f-/!.O /4sna/~ ~ /6si-a-+E-sT. acct/tL~. o e~,cl~~7goe1C'o/ SCpEi'~'~+~ClGanou~/D/uq. ~a t 9z _ OO ~ .na y /OWCr E,Yis~' ad,,, ~i~ '/ b ' m o ala++cc ~-c5! ----~ aspka/f Lrr~/e 1 ~4r4gQ. i O ~ h m (1roa.nd c...,d aWay~r'o,r, SySE~-'l• L~CO~'Y 3z. 9B P~.~~ ~ commerce.wi.gov isconsin Department of Commerce SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729 (715) 726-2544 http.//www.commerce. wi.gov/sb httplrLvww. Wisconsin. gov TTY.' Contact Through Relay Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary October 7, 2009 William Schumaker, MP 227990 1070 Scott Rd Hudson, W 154016 Dear Mr. Schumaker: Re: Dan Anderson -Mound Installation Plan Transaction ID: 1703282 Lots 91-92 Edgewood Estates I I I SE, NW, 7, 29, 19W Town of Hudson, St. Croix County It is my understanding that progress on the replacement of Dan Anderson's on-site system has virtually stalled. However, the appropriate trees have been cut down so the site is about ready for the installation. In addition, the county indicated recently that no sanitary permit has been issued to install the system. Unfortunately, weather this time of year is not our friend. Precipitation events are now more frequent and factors, such as evapotranspiration from plants and warm temperatures, that dry the soil surface act much more slowly. This makes your installation opportunities less frequent and when the soil freezes the installation of a mound is prohibited. Please obtain the sanitary permit for this job by Wednesday, October 14, 2009. This is your next step and will indicate to us your intention to install the system. By October 23, 2009, I would expect there would have been amble opportunity to complete the installation including seeding and mulching. After October 23`d, I will need to continue on with our enforcement action to ensure compliance with my orders issued on September 11, 2008. In past cases, the state attorney general, whom typically prosecutes our cases, may also wish to seek a forfeiture as allowed under s. 145.12(4), Wis. Stats. Please get back to me as soon as possible with your time table to complete this project. Respectfully, Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist (715) 726-2544 Office leroy.jansky~a wisconsin.gov e-cc: St. Croix County Zoning and Owner enclosure: Orders dated September 11, 2008 1 '~ commerce.wi.gov isconsin Department of Commerce Safety and Buildings 3824 N CREEKSIDE LA HOLMEN WI 54636 Contact Through Relay www. commerce.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary September 08, 2009 CUST ID No. 227990 WILLIAM C SCHUMAKER SCHUMAKER PLUMBING 1070 SCOTT RD HUDSON WI 54016 ATTN.• POWTS Inspector ZONING OFFICE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1101 CARMICHAEL RD HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 09/08/2011 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1703282 SITE• Site ID No. 751022 Dan & Shannon Anderson Please. refer to both identification numbers,. 335 Edgewood Dr above, in all corres ondence with the a enc Town of Hudson St Croix County SE1/4, NW1/4, S7, T29N, R19W Lot: 91-92-93, Subdivision: Plat of Edgewood Estates FOR: Description: Four Bedroom Mound System / 17% slope Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1238941 Maintenance required; Replacement system; 600 GPD Flow rate; 32 in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade; System(s): Ezflow Mound Component Manual, (N.6/03), Pressure Distribution Component Manual - Version 2.0, SBD-10706-P (N.O1/O1); Effluent Filter The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with any component manual(s) referenced above. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. P• ~ No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per s.145.06, Cn72d stats. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: DEPARTMEII OIVISiOtJ ~f SAI Reminders ~~~ • A sanitary permit must be obtained from the county where this project is located in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 145.135 and 145.19, Wis. Stats. SEE CORR • Inspection of the private sewage system installation is required. Arrangements for inspection shall be made with the designated county official in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 145.20(2)(d), Wis. Stats. • The area within 15 feet horizontally down slope of the dispersal cell shall remain undisturbed. Vehiculaz traffic or soil compaction in this area is prohibited. • The existing tanks shall be inspected for compliance to Comm 83, Wis. Adm. Code. If they do not comply they shall be abandoned per Comm 83.33, Wis. Adm. Code. • Maintenance information must be given to the owner of the tank explaining that periodic cleaning of the effluent filter is required. Access to the filter for cleaning must be provided per Comm 84 product approval conditions. • A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. WILLIAM C SCHUMAKER Page 2 9/8/2009 Owner Responsibilities: • The current owner, and each subsequent owner, shall receive a copy of this letter including instructions relating to proper use and maintenance of the system. Owners shall receive a copy of the appropriate operation and maintenance manual and/or owner's manual for the POWTS described in this approval. • The owner of a POWTS shall be responsible for ensuring that the operation and maintenance of the POWTS occurs in accordance with this chapter and the approved management plan under s. Comm 83.54(1). • In the event this soil absorption system or any of its component parts malfunctions so as to create a health hazard, the property owner must follow the contingency plan as described in the approved plans. • The owner is responsible for submitting a maintenance verification report acceptable to the county for maintenance tracking purposes. Reports shall be submitted at intervals appropriate for the component(s) utilized in the POWTS. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS. Sincerely, erard M Swim POWTS Plan Reviewer, Integrated Services (608)789-7892, Mon -Fri, 7:15 am - 4:00 pm j erry. swim@wisconsin.gov Fee Required $ 250.00 Fee Received $ 250.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 WiSMART code: 7633. cc: Leroy G Jansky, POWTS Wastewater Specialist, (715) 726-2544 ,Friday, 7:00 A.M. To 3:30 P.M. Notice: Starting July 1, 2009, no person or entity may engage or offer to engage in construction business in Wisconsin unless they hold a Building Contractor Registration, or equivalent, issued by the Safety and Buildings Division of the Wisconsin Deparkment of Commerce. "Construction business" means a trade that installs, alters or repairs arty building element, component, material or device that is regulated under the commercial building code, chs. Comm 60 to 66, the uniform dwelling code, chs. Comm 20 to 25, the electrical code, ch. Comm 16, the plumbing code, chs. Comm 81 to 87, or the public swimming pools and water attractions code, ch. Comm 90. The term does not include the delivery of building supplies or materials, or the manufacture of a building product not on the building site. For further information, go to our website: www.commerce.wi.gov/SB/SB-BuildingContractorProgram.html EZFLOW MOUND AND PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT DESIGN Residential Application INDEX AND TITLE PAGE Project Name: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Owner's Name: Dan & Shannon Anderson Owner's Address: 335 Edgewood Drive Hudson, WI 54016 Site Address: Same Legal Description: SE1/4NW1/4, Sec. 7, T.29N., R.19W. Township: Hudson County: St. Croix Subdivision Name: Edoewood Estates Lot Number: ~ 91, 92, 93 Block Number: Na Parcel I.D. Number: 020-1170-80-000 Plan Transaction No.: Page 1 Index and title Page 2 Data entry Page 3 EZFIow mound drawings Page 4 Lateral and dose tank Page 5 Distribution media Page 6 System maintenance specifications Page 7 Management and contingency plan Page 8 Pump curve and specifications Page 9 Attached Soil Evaluaiton Report Designer: Bill Schumaker License Number: Date: 06/16/09 Phone Number: Signature: j,~.i~y;~ .~- 227990 !•7.~. o~r~ e~~' ~~' i= COMAgERCE 'AND BUILDINGS 'OI~ENCE ^' (715) 386-3121 Designed Pursuant to the EZFIow Mound Component Manual (N. 06103), and SSWMP Publication 9.6 Design of Pressure Distribution Networks for ST-SAS (01/81) EZFIow Mound Version 1.2 (R. 02/04) Page 1 of 9 EZFIow Mound and Pressure Distribution Component Design Design Worksheet Site In f orm ation _ _ (r or c) ! _.~ R Residential or Commercial Design ~_ _.400.00 Estimated Wastewater Flow (gpd) 1.50 Peaking Factor (e.g. 1.5 = 150%) 600.00 Design Flow (gpd) 17.00 ~ Site Slope (%) ~.__~ !_ 116.90 Installation Contour Line Elevation (ft) _ 32.00 Depth to Limiting Factor (in) 0.60 In-situ Soil Application Rate (gpd/ftz) Distribution Cell Information `__~_ ___9.00 Cell Width (ft) 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, or 10 Only f 1.00 Dispersal Cell Design Loading Rate (gpd/ftz) I _ui 1 Influent Wastewater Quality (1 or 2) Pressure Disribution Information (c or e) ~-~el Center or End Manifold 3.00 Lateral Spacing (ft) 3 Number of Laterals ~ _.__0.125 Orifice Diameter (in) (e.g. 0.25) 2.50 Estimated Orifice Spacing (ft) _ f. __.__-_ _ _ __ 2.001 Forcemain Diameter (in) _ _ 1 _ 170.001 Forcemain Length (ft) i~~ 91.2, Inside Pump Tank Elevation (ft) 6.50 System Head (ft) x 1.3 25.69 Vertical Lift (ft) 4.29 Friction Loss (ft) 36.48 Total Dynamic Head (ft) Lateral Diameter Selection in. dia. o tions choice 0.75 -._.__.-- 1.00 ~__ _ 1.25 X x ;._ 1.50 x i .. _. -- - 2.00 . x -- - - 3.00 x Treatment Tank Information 2200.OO~Septic Tank Capacity (gal) Wieser Concrete i Manufacturer Note: Sand fill (D) calculations assume a Table 83-44-3 in-situ soil treatment for fecal coliform of <= 36 inches. 90.00 Contour Length Available (ft) 70.00 =Dispersal Cell Length (ft) Are the laterals the highest oint in the distribution Y network? Enter Y or N If N above, enter the elevation ft of the highest point. 7.50 ft~/orifice Does the forcemain drain back? Y Enter Y or N 27.73 Forcemain Drainback (gal) 65.55 5x Void, Volume (gal) 93.28 Minimum Dose Volume (gal) 34.60 System Demand (gpm) Manifold Diameter Selection in. dia. o tions choice 1.25 x 1.50 x 2.00 x x 3.00 Gallons/Inch Calculator (optional) 800.00 Total Tank Capacity (gal) 38.00 Total Working Liquid Depth (in) 21.05 gal/in (enter result in cell B49) Dose Tank Information Effluent Filter Information f 800.00 Dose Tank Capacity (gal) Zabel Filter Manufacturer 21.05 Dose Tank Volume (gal/in) A-100 Filter Model Number ;Wieser„Concrete_~ J Manufacturer Project: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Page 2 of 8 Mound Plan View 1- 1 .................................................. ~'~ 1/10 B ~.~:~:......~.~.~.~.~.~.~...ObservationPipe ...... . K :.r.:.f.f:f:f.:.:.f.f:,..:f..: :~ti ••~ .:ti~`.~•.~`.~•.:ti~`.~'. ~•. ~•. ~. ~ti ~. ~1~1~ti•ti~ti%•:~.•1•~ ~ti ~ti ~tiy. :'{ti{r~r; :; :,~r; :; ~:; ~: r.: .: .: .: .: .r. :.r.r.r.r.r.:.r.r.r.:.r. r.:.r.r.r. :: {.... ti..........•. • :%{,•.•ti...••..•..1.ti.ti.ti.ti..,.ti.t.ti.ti.ti.ti.ti.~y . .I. .. .l . B .'.'4~4'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.','.','.'.','.'.'.','.','.','.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' -T J - 1 IA I i L Mound Component Dimensions A 9.00 ft E 24.36 in H 1.00 ft K 9.80 ft B 70.00 ft F 12.00 in z 21.61 ft L 89.59 ft D 6.00 in G 0.50 ft J 3.97 ft W 34.59 ft 630.00 (ft2) Dispersal Cell Area 2142.86 (ft2) Basal Area Available 8.57 (gpd/ft) Linear Loading Rate 7.00 (ft) 1/10 B Obs. Pipe Placement Mound Cross Section View Aggregate Dispersal Area Finished Grade 119.40 (ft) F k~ . 117.40 (ft) ~ - ~ ~k ~ ~ 6" s Dispersal Cell ~~: Elevation ~I H Dispersal Cell 117.90 (ft) Lateral Invert Elevation .D [~: ~~' 116.90 (ft) Contour Elevation Shading Key 1Q Topsoil Cap Subsoil Cap :~:~ ASTM C33 Sand <~:;,<~~ Tilled Layer © ~:••; EZFIow Media 17.0 % Site Slope d Typical Dispersal Cell d ~• ' See Page 5 ii ~ w `0 2.0 ft Geotextile Fabric over w ti.ti{ti•1• {: rh. 1:11. .1 -t- L. . 1•r.r.r.r• r.r r.. r•r•r•r•r• ti.ti ti ~.~. ti. .,r. r.}. :. r.r 1. S• S titer}f. F . ~ O 15 ft r•. r•r r•r.r.r•r.r• r•r r.r. S.1 L.L• ti•tiK 1.5i.... '•'ti'ti ~• •r• r•r•: .~•r•r•r•r•r r•r•r•r•r•r ti fti fti fti. ti f`. f5i f1 fti ti~ti fL fti fti i ~- A See details on page 4 for number, size, and spacing of laterals. Laterals are located in the 4" gravity distribution pipes as shown on page 5. Project: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Page 3 of 8 End Connection Lateral Layout Diagram Project: t: Turrt-uP+h+1~11v~N~orol~snoutplup ~ P ,~ -z -311 st oritoce bcertecl art z IF x-~I xn te~erats idtrrlical, wn odhes equelyspaceo. s Force main connection van tee or cr»ss to manifold ffi arry poirrt. Laaeeals ~ loror main of r>+rc sen +o S (per COr~ TaeN 61.30.6) Orifices poirR up except every 5th one points down fa drairu+ge. Number of Laterals 3 Orifice Diameter Lateral Diameter 1.25 in Orifice Spacing (X) Lateral Length (P) 69.29 ft Orifices per Lateral Lateral End (Z) 0.71 ft Orifice Density Lateral Spacing (S) 3.00 ft Manifold Length Lateral Flow Rate 11.53 gpm Manifold Diameter System Flow Rate 34.60 gpm Forcemain Velocity Dose Tank Information Electrical as per NEC 300 and '~ Comm 16.28 WAC Disconnect ~_ 0.125 in 2.54 ft 28 7.50 ft2/orifice 6.00 ft 2.00 in 3.53 ft/sec Locking cover with warning label and locking device, and sealed watertight 4 in. min. Tank component is properly vented Wieser Concrete Ca acit 800.00 Volume 21.05 Manufacturer Gallons gal/inch ~- A B C D Dimension Inches Gallons A 19.57 412.02 B 2.00 42.10 C D Total 4.43 12.00 ~ 38.00 93.28 252.60 800.00 Min. 3" Bedding under tank. Alarm Manufacturer LevelArm Alarm Model Number ' 101 DLV Pump Manufacturer Goulds _ _ ~__~ ... Pump Model Number WE07H _. _ _ _ _~ Pump Must Deliver 34.60 gpm at 36.48 ft TDH Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound ~ Alternate outlet location Forcemain diameter ~ 2 in. Weep hole or anti- siphon device P= ump off elevation (ft) 92.21 Do• se tank elevation (ft) 91.21 Page 4 of 8 EZFIow Distribution Cell Media Layout 9.00 Cell Width (ft) 1.50 Sidewall to Lateral (ft) Distribution Cell Cross-section Arrangements Drag appropriate drawing to space below. 9 ft Wide Component Legend ® 6" EZFIow Bundle - EZ0601A, 5 or 10 Foot Lengths 12" EZFIow Bundle - EZ1203H, 5 or 10 Foot Lengths 5 or 10 Ft Len ths 12" EZFIow Bundle - EZ1203HP , g ~ 4" Distribution Pipe With Pressure Lateral Inside ~ Turnup Enclosure - - - - Lateral Distribution Cell Plan View Layout -Typical 9.00 Cell Width - A (ft) - ~ 70.00 Cell Length - B (ft) 9 ft Wide End ------------------ -------- ---- Manifold -Force Main Project; Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Page 5 of 8 Mound System Management Plan Pursuant to Comm 83.54, Wis. Adm. Code General This system shall be operated in accordance with Comm 82-84 Wis. Adm. Code, and shall maintained in accordance with its' component manuals (SBD-10691-P (N.01/01), SSWMP Publication 9.6 (01/81), and Pressure Distribution Component Manual Ver. 2.0 SBD-10706-P (N. 01/01)] and local or state rules pertaining to system maintenance and maintenance reporting. No one should ever enter a septic or pump tank since dangerous gases may be present that could cause death. Septic and pump tank abandonment shall be in accordance with Comm 83.33, Wis. Adm. Code when the tanks are no longer used as POWTS components. Septic or pump tank manhole risers, access risers and covers should be inspected for water tightness and soundness. Access openings used for service and assessment shall be sealed watertight upon the completion of service. Any opening deemed unsound, defective, or subject to failure must be replaced. Exposed access openings greater than 8-inches in diameter shall be secured by an effective locking device to prevent accidental or unauthorized entry into a tank or component. Septic Tank The septic tank shall be maintained by an individual certified to service septic tanks under s. 281.48, State. The contents of the septic tank shall be disposed of in accordance with NR 113, Wis. Adm. Code. The operating condition of the septic tank and outlet filter shall be assessed at least once every 3 years by inspection. The outlet filter shall be cleaned as necessary to ensure proper operation. The filter cartridge should not be removed unless provisions GIC IIIOUC tV ICtdln SJIidS In the lank that may slough off the filter when removed from its enclosure. If the filter is equipped with an alarm, the filter shall be serviced if the alarm is activated continuously. Intermittent filter alarms may indicate surge flows or an impending continuous alarm. The septic tank shall have its contents removed when the volume of sludge and scum in the tank exceeds 1/3 the liquid volume of the tank. If the contents of the tank are not removed at the time of a triennial assassnl~anlt, maiiltcilailGc jrbi5viliici bilaii au'viac ~ileviivilcr Of when the next service needs to be performed to maintain less than maximum scum and sludge accumulation in the tank. The addition of biological or chemical additives to enhance septic tank performance is generally not required. However, if such products are used they shall be approved for septic tank use by the Department of Commerce. Pump Tank The pump (dosing) tank shall be inspected at least once every 3 years. All switches, alarms, and pumps shall be tested to verify proper operation. If an effluent filter is installed within the tank it shall be inspected and serviced as necessary. Mound and Pressure Distribution Svstem No trees or shrubs should be planted on the mound. Plantings may be made around the mound's perimeter, and the mound shall be seeded and mulched as necessary.to prevent erosion and to provide some protection from frost penetration. Traffic (other than for vegetative maintenance) on the mound is not recommended since soil compaction may hinder aeration of the infiltrative surface within the mound and snow compaction in the winter will promote frost penetration. Cold weather installations (October-February) dictate that the mound be heavily mulched as protection from freezing. Influent quality into the mound system may not exceed 220 mg/L 6005, 150 mg/L TSS, and 30 mg/L FOG for septic tank effluent or 30 mg/L GODS, 30 mg/L TSS, 10 mg/L FOG, and 10' cfu/100 mL for highly treated effluent. Influent flow may not exceed maximum design flow specified in the permit for this installation. The pressure distribution system is provided with a flushing point at the end of each lateral, and it is recommended that each lateral be flushed of accumulated solids at least once every 18 months. When a pressure test is performed it should be compared to the initial test when the system was installed to determine if orifice clogging has occurred and if orifice cleaning is required to maintain equal distribution within the dispersal cell. Gbsavation pipes within tfie dispersal cell shall be checked for effluent ponding. Ponding levels shall be reported to the owner, and any levels above 6 inches considered as an impending hydraulic failure requiring additional, more frequent monitoring. Continoencv Plan If the septic tank or any of its components become defective the tank or component shall be repaired or replaced to keep the system in proper operating condition. If the dosing tank, pump, pump controls, alarm or related wiring becomes defective the defective component(s) shall be immediately repaired or replaced with a component of the same or equal performance. :f :~~ ^^~;:^d cc^^porcnt fails to accept wastewater or begins to discharge wastewater to the ground surface, it will be repaired or replaced in its' present location by increasing basal area if toe leakage occurs or by removing biologically clogged absorption and dispersal media, and related piping, and replacing said components as deemed necessary to bring the system into proper operating condition. See Page 5 of this plan for the name and telephone number of your local POWTS regulator and service provider. Pretreatment Units The information and schedule of mananagement and maintenance for pretreatment devices such as aerobic treatment units or disinfection units are attached as separate documents and are considered part of the overall management plan for this system. Project: Page 6 of 9 •+• &h Jt ,^ Ef lluen! P-" '~~ MODEL: 3885 G r ~ .~. /Y. r, r t ',i rti.hh. 7: ;k: S CAPACITY Features and Benefits •All models feature silicon carbide "lechanical sea! far"5 for superior ~~orasr~e res~sta.~rce Ind extra ~~~~h,g life. ~~~ i:~ol s~„~~-o c non-clog it f~el~ip, ~ ~,, lti~ 1;;-C~~it Vanes for mechanical seas ;;protection. • Rugged cast ~:~-o„ ~,~ol~~~te type casing acia;t~ble for slide ail systems. • Corrosion reslstah 'breaded ~ a IieSS (6e'~~ ~hafl • r'cor,s ,~ ~; s~.; ~ ~._rged ~n high ~,I~t~,. o~ f~~, ,uL-~cation and efficient I.eat transfer. • ~ t,'~ora1 sli~con l ~.r~ze impeller :;~a~la!~ie. '~SA 1~~5teC1 ~~~odels available. Pump Specifications '-~ HP Up to 75 GPM Maximum head to 18' Discharge size 2" NPT Solids: 2" maximum Motor All motors feature ball bearing construction. Single phase. 115U Materials of Construction Cast iron Thermoplastic Stainless steel Features and Benefits •Glass filled, thermoplastic ~~:~c~ie~ impeller with stainless steep insert and pump out vanes fcr mechanical seal protector • Rugged glass filled thermop~astc casing and base desig , ;rc~: C=~ super+or strength and ccr°cs ~~~, resistance. • Cast iron motor housing f~,. efficient heat transfer. sire ig~~ and durability. •COrrOSfOn reSlStant U,r~~,,' C stainless steel shaft. •Available in automatic ~ ~ ~,<<~~,~ models. •CSA listed models a~,~~i,h~e ~r Underwriters Laboratories ~~ ~ ~~, l,u~e!s aye ciesigred for continuous operation and feature stainless steel hardware. ~. ~0~9 ~~ - - ; -- JAY :~..~.,~1. irtC~P~S~jY.~ ~ „i~i., , v, L. .-.~~..,~r _ ~ e\ • ~ ~ ~` ~~ s' ~ e `~ ~ r~~ ~~~ ~33~•~~ '~ -t ~. ~ h ~ ~ ~ 3 n~Z ~~ a ,'.~ L ,~ `i :: Q~~ ~~~ ~`_ _ ~!v'~~sysf`'" ~" ~ `~ ~ Proposl.d /t(ou.ndat3~1,.s3~x8'9.~4Y - 9 AS'x 70. ~'aG's~s.~/ Ce/%Ti(ra c(~ _ • , •~, drsi`i'~'bu.~'a~ /afcr7z/s a~E ll~y is b 9, z9' '. ,J ~ ~~ //G.o, _ - ~- ------- -__- -ii~.o• v ~; ve _^ ,LoE 93 .~ /'fa e; ~i1.S~t d~rad¢ 4 ~ u~ds off' •/7o'oflusc.,(• s~OP./C.+ro+'Y~G~+tQi/t. .Cc~92 au.,o/ ~ divY.it Sui'f+cCC cckt~~ /j2 Q.ro can d an d tt caJay ~'/'Orr~ Sy.S~e+~2 ~ ~- ~ co.+,6~%~..~,y.- Sri ~xisu:, r,~;eur f~r+cr l ~/~ Pte. w/ °x,;{~~ ~a.bc/ A-/60 ~F/!c sn ~~"/6sra-E S T. auaE/c.~. SSu,ri Gl¢.v.-~ /obi' v cat9z _ _ a""'. r1~ yc+ldtn Ei~/s~~ `1 brn btu o res: d~cc ----~ aspl~ihE ~ ~fivC ~4~44 Q, ~ • O 1 /32.98 p~.~~'~ ~~ ~~ISCOi1~S1/f SOIL EVALUATION REPOR~ #1602 Department of Commerce in accordance with Com m. Code Page 1 of 4 Division of Safety and Buildings ~~i~~~ v ~~ Schmitt Soil Testing, Inc. Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8h x 1 inches in size. Plan must County St. Croix include, but not Hmibad to: vertic;at and horizontal cafe point (BM), i ' percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and I ar~p~ta roa , Parcel I.D. 020-1170-80-000 ,. P-eaae print aU informatio Personal inNormation Yoe Provide maybe used fiot secondary (~~~ ~~¢i~) (m))_ Reviewed BY I Date Anderson, Dan Govt. Lot SE1/4, NW1/4, S7, T29N, R79W Properly Owners Mailing Address Lot # Stock # Subd. Name or CStVI# 335 Edgewood Dr 91,92,93 Edgewood Estates City State Zap Code Phone Number ~ City ^ VHage ®Town Nearest Road Hudsonnn WI 54016 Hudson Ed Drive ^ New Construction Use: ®Residentiat /Number of bedrooms derived design flow rate 4s0 GPD ®Replacement ^ Public or c~mmmerciai - Descnbe: Parent material Glaaal till (Amery Series) Flood plain elevation, ff applicable na ft. General comments and recxrmmendations: Recommend 6" mound. System elevation is 117.4' based off contour line established at 116.9'.. Slope of area is 17%. Grading may have to be done to divert water around mound. ®Pit Ground surface elev. 101.60 R r r Ong # ^ ~~ Depth to limiting factor 0 in. SoH Application Rabe Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consists Boundary Roots GP D/ft' i Munseli Gr. Sz. Sh. 'EH#1 •Eff#2 1 0-81 Baddill material --- ----- Pit is in baddilt material, it is along skis of the Infiltrator chambers and directly over the perforated pipe in the original (bed) drainfield that was ~~ # ®Piot~ Ground surface elev. 106.95 ft. Depth to 6mfing factor 32 in. Soil Application Rabe Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consisten Boundary Roots GP D/fts in. Munsetl Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Efl#1 •Eit#2 1 0-5 10yr3/3 none sil 2mgr mvFr cs 2c,2m .6 .8 2 5-14 10yr5/3 none sil impl mfr gw 2m,2f .4c .6 3 14-27 10yr5/6 none sif 2fsbk mfr gw 2f,2m .6 .8 4 27-32 10yr4/6 none sl lmsbk mfr gw 2m .4 .7 5 32-88 Syr4/4 none sl Om mfi gw -- .2 .6 Starting at 32", very dense sandy loam, restrictive layer. Effluent #1 = BODg> 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mgJL " Effluent #2 =SODS <_30 mg/L and TSS <_30 mgll CST Nam (Please Print) Signature: _ CST Number Thomas J. Schmitt ~~~~~ 227429 Address Schmitt Soil Testing, Inc. ~ Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1595 72nd Street New R'~chmond, Wl 54017 8/512008 715-247-2941 sen-s3ao ae.mao) 1/ ~' V 020-1170-80-000 ~` Page 2 of 4 ! ' property fawner Anderson, Dan _ Parcel ID # Boring # ®~ring 116.30 ft. Depth to limiting factor 39 in. Ground surface elev. Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots in. Munsetl Qu. Sz Cont. Color Gr. Sz Sh. Soil Application Rate •Ef~ GPD ~~ 1 0-6 10yr3/4 none sit 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 .8 2 6-27 10yr5/3 rwne I 2msbk mvfr gw 2f,ivf .6 .8 3 27-39 10yr5/6 none sit 2msbk mfr gv+r 2vf .6 .8 4 39-60 10yr5/6 none sl Om mfi a 2m,2f .2 .6 5 60-104 7.5yr4/6 none sl Om mfi - ---- ,2 .6 Starting at 39", very dense Sandy loam, firm consistence. Restrictive layer. Boring # Horizon Depth in. ®p ftnng Ground surface elev. Dominant Cotor Redox Description Munsetl Qu. Sz Cont. Color 116.30 ft. Depth to limiting factor 40" in. Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Gr. Sz. Sh. Soil Application Rate GPD/ft2 'Efr#1 ~Etf#2 1 0-18 10yr3/4 none I 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 .8 2 18-26 10yr5/3 none sit 2fsbk mfr gw 2m,2f .6 .8 3 26-40 10yr4/6 none ~ 2msbk mfr gw 2vf .6 1.0 4 40-53 10yr5/6 none sl Om mfi gw •2 •6 5 53-96 5yr4/6 none sl Om mfi --- .2 .6 Starting at 40", very dense sandy loam, massive, restrictive layer. a Boring # Horizon Depth in. ~ Boring ® pit Ground surface elev. 113.0 ft. Depth to liming factor 36 in. Soil Application Rate Dominant Cobr Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 Munsetl Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz Sh. 'Ett#1 'Eft1R2 1 0-16 10yr3/3 none I 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 .8 2 16-26 10yr5/3 none I 2fsbk mfr gw 2m,2f .6 .8 g 26-36 10yr5/6 none sit 2msbk mfr ---- 2vf .6 .8 Shovel pit, didn't dig with backhce to avoid disturbing soil. All other pits were already restrictive. Effluent #1 = BODg> 30 <_ 220 mg1L and TSS >30 <150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BODS <_ 30 mglL and TSS <_30 mg/L The Departrnent of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please wntact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SdrNIR Shc Tes1>ng, Lrc. amn o»n rv mxn~ Paged of 4 ~ v• ~ 'Gonducfied by: Conducted. For: Schmitt Soil 'besting Inc. Dame: Dan 8t Shann+on Anderson Thongs J. Schmitt, CST 27429 Address: 335 Edgewovd Drive 1595 72nd St. Cfiy, State, Zip: Hudson, WI 54016 l~tew Richmond, ~. 54017 Phone: 715-247-2941 - Subd.Ptame: Edgevvood Estates III Lot No.: 91, 92, Bt R3 s• o~ ~ ! / ~ 8' I:egal Description: SEl/4 ~tWl/4 S7 T29AI R19W ^ I3ackhne pit ~ -- Township, Cotu~ty: Hudson St. Croix ,~ Bench Mark EL 10000' Top of motion plug in cast iron pipe on first septic tank from mouse Q Alter~te Bench Mark El. 117.70' Nad in 9" Pop~r Tree Contour Length 75' SIo~ 17'i'o Contour Lime El. 11690' Sc~1e 1" = 40' l~,'e~'' ~~k ~~,~ ~e y~ !~ r ~,.. ~ ~L, 1/6-qn / ~ ~ ~T ~ / ~ ` ~ t ~ ~ ~- ~ Ca h ~ .~ . ~ ~ :~- / i ~ ~ / ~ ~~ r -- ~, u-1-~, p,resrtl.~or`~ L ~ tV C ~- /~to re ~ ~,9S~.~lQ~- ,jj P Std~'re 7~,r/ G7~/1/~/~' o~rc~.,7z ayQ ~«~ necRsS~,,y c~ou,wd s~~ e,zal ®~ sl'~e . C~~ ~~~~ fit. ITT APPLICATIONS Specifically designed for the following uses: • Homes, Farms, Trailer Courts, Motels, Schools, Hospitals, Industry, Effluent Systems SPECIFICATIONS Pump • Solids handling capabilities: 3/d' maximum. • Discharge size: 2" NPT. • Capacities: up to 140 GPM. • Total heads: up to 128 feet TDH. • Temperature: 104°F (40°C) continuous, 140°F (60°C) intermittent. • See order numbers on reverse side for specific HP, voltage, phase and RPM's available. MOTORS ^ Fully submerged in high-grade turbine oil for lubrica- tion and efficient heat transfer. ^ Class B insulation on'/3 -1'/z HP models. ^ Class F insulation on 2 HP models. Single phase (60 Hz): • Capacitor start motors for maximum starting torque. • Built-in overload with automatic reset. • SJTOW or STOW severe duty oil and water resistant power cords. METERS FEET 40 1 _ 1 35 1 30 1 0 w 25 s u a 20 z 0 F 15 O f- 10 5 0 GOULDS PUMPS Wastewater • Y3 -1 HP models have NEMA three prong grounding plugs. • 1'/z HP and larger units have bare lead cord ends. Three phase (60 Hz): • Class 10 overload protection must be provided in separately ordered starter unit. • STOW power cords all have bare lead cord ends. ^ Designed for Continuous Operation: Pump ratings are within the motor manufacturers recommended working limits, can be operated continuously without damage when fully submerged. ^ Bearings: Upper and lower heavy duty ball bearing construction. ^ Power Cable: Severe duty rated, oil and water resistant. Epoxy seal on motor end provides secondary moisture barrier in case of outer jacket damage and to prevent oil wicking. Standard cord is 20'. Optional lengths are available. ^ 0-ring: Assures positive sealing against contaminants and oil leakage. AGENCY LISTINGS Tested to UL 778 and CSA 22.2 108 Standards S ~ ® By Canadian Standards Association File #LR38549 c us Goulds Pumps is ISO 9001 Registered. ~0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 GPM 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 m3/hr cAPaciTv 2 _.-. w , i, ~~ ~ ~Cl"G ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ` r ~! }~., ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~r ~(rc ~ ~ ~~ 1 tQ ~~,~. ~ '~~ ~ Oi ;n ~~~ fd. ff'G~ 1 1 • /(t ~ o~ .~ y, ~ ~• ` C C `Ly ~ ~ ~ ~ ., q o 3 v r ~ ~ ` ~ ~~~ ~3 :~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~~opos.e.d hCaccndat31.87jr~c~'ccy ~.SBkTd.GO'GtiS~rSt/Ce1/. Ti ie<~ ~, ~•- Q _ _ ~ diS~rl~cc~an /a~t.~zz/sa,G 1J~/icG~sj'r ~'- ~n g~ . ~ - - - ' - .- ` ~. w/Yt~'or+f%Ces.S~ccd a~L ss~' i +1} r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ' _f > ~~ /!G_~~ /70'af ",X,(, f/O P. d, C . *CO~ngctin. ,CoC 92 /7Zri~r~ ~ drv~t .Su/'f t C[ cc~•Ltu" we~.rrd a.,d c2 waY k' 'on, SySE~I• =d9 e wa~c, d'sP~'s~c~ur- ~ ~ •~ ~ 18 w~ o~Cr;i'~Irq ?s`by/.4-/i4 #'~4 an ~~/6~.-a-~ S T. ou-~/c~. Lot 92 __ .__ ____ _.___. l`°E p/ G~ris~ l~ ~~OWCr YYYllim y~tn ~~, ~ J .~ ybui~m ~ bid ' afa~+CC a /^ G S~ ____, 4s plutfE ~ I Gtrill~ ~Q.f'Q4Q" J t gf~ ~~~~~~:oy O O Q1co~Y 3.2.98 6'd 9989-98£-9 LL p9,~~' ~ pe;suaof8 siuueQ ~LZ~LO OL 6Z u~f Page 1 of 9 Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:42 PM To: Pam Quinn; Ryan Yarrington Subject: [BULK) FW: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Importance: Low FYI -did you get/find the fax from Denny yet? I have not received anything... From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:40 PM To: 'Anderson, Dan' Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence I thought that I discussed the meeting results with you on the phone but you are correct there should be something is writing. December 10, 2009 Meeting at St. Croix County Zoning Present: Leroy Jansky, Pam Quin, Ryan Yarrington, Bill Schumaker and Dennis Bjornstad The purpose of this meeting was to attenpt to resolve several issues that have prevented or delayed installation of a mound system at the Dan Anderson property located at 335 Edgewood Dr., Hudson, WI 54016. The major point discussed include: 1. The need to use topsoil from the lot to complete final grading of the mound was discussed. The owner has been opposed to this action. The contractors feel that they can successfully remove topsoil without killing numerous trees and still provide adequate surface water drainage around/away from the up slope side of the mound. Contractors would use as much on site soil material as possible and then haul in topsoil as need to finish the job. 2. Large trees woulod not be disturbed according to Bjornstad. 3. The owner will not sign the liability release proposed by Bjornstad & Sons. Dennis indicated that he could live without the consumation of that particular document. 4. 1n consideration of winter conditions and the need to allow the soil to dry out a bit in the early spring, a June 1, 2010 completion deadline was agreed to by teh parties present. 5. To make the owner more at ease with the proposed site work, Bjornstad will prepare a site plan showing work areas to be disturbed and final landscaping plans. This plan will be submitted by 1/1/10 to the zoning office, state and owner. (end) Yesterday, I checked with Schumaker, Bjordstad and St. Croix County regarding item number 5 above. Schumaker stated that Bjornstad sent it to the county before the end of the year. The county had not received it and neither have I so I called Bjornstad. He said that he faxed it to the county on 12/31/09. He will resend the fax to the county and als send one to me. Once it is received I will send you a copy. I have started an enforcement action against Schumaker but our new database is giving me some problems. Hopefully, I can generate a letter in the next day or two so I'll have something for review by management. 1!20/2010 - ~ Page 2 of 9 That's all I have for now. Have a good day. Leroy G. Jansky, Professional Soil Scientist POWTS Wastewater Specialist leroy.jansky~wisconsin.gov 13 E. Spruce St. Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 Office (715) 726-2549 Fax (715} 828-5902 Cel{ From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:Dan.Anderson@fiserv.com) Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:45 PM To: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE Cc: Pam Quinn; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Last we spoke Leroy, you were requesting a plan for the site to be submitted to you and me before Jan 1. I have not heard from anyone or seen a proposal. I still don't want an access road put in but was waiting to see their proposal before going to my next step. I also still have not seen and meeting minutes from your meeting at the zoning office. I thought you said I would get those, maybe not. You also said you were going forward with legal from your side. What is that status? Just looking to get this resolved. :Dan Anderson PS Production Services Fiserv Ofl;ce: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:03 AM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Sounds a bit better than last week. Hope your talks went well. Leray G. Jansky, CPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, W154729 (715) 726-2544 -Office (715) 726-2549 -Fax (715) 828-5902 -Cell 1 /20/2010 Page 1 of 8 Pam Quinn From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:11 AM To: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE Cc: Pam Quinn; Ryan Yarrington Subject: [BULK] RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Importance: Low Well, we had a very nice conversation but nothing changed. He still wants to cut the access road and he's not hauling dirt. I'm not going to allow for scrapping and I'm not buying dirt. I have a receipt from Denny where I paid him 2 years ago for 40 yards of dirt to fix the septic. This was their original attempt to fix it, by putting dirt on the hole it's leaking from. My position has not changed. They will haul in dirt and I need a signed proposal of what's to be done. This document will include Bills bonding insurance info. The proposal is a standard for any contract work and hauling dirt for a mound is also a standard. Me demanding standards be met should be assumed and not change the fact the order is not being completed. Schmidt's are supplying me with an updated estimate. He said the way he builds mounds, there would be no access road (they would dump sand in the ditch where Denny said its' too dangerous) and his estimates always include hauling dirt for cover. He rarely ever scrapes. Holiday and snow this week so we'll see what happens next week. I will not stop a system from being installed yet this fall but personally, I hope it doesn't so I can wash my hands of this and let my lawyer handle it from here. Then you can progress with your legal side too and send it to the attorney general for your next steps. I have seen none of your orders completed and I am not the cause of the delays. Even the few steps taken by Bill towards completion (permit paid and mound plans submitted) were not done by the deadline you defined from them. I still don't know if the fines stated on the order of $10 TO $1000 PER DAY already accrued are paid to the state or to me. I also don't know if you will be enforcing that portion or when you will. Can I know this info? Have a great holiday, we'll talk again next week. Thanks From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:03 AM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Sounds a bit better than last week. Hope your talks went well. Leroy G. Jansky, CPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist 11/25/2009 Page 2 of 8 Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 -Office (715) 726-2549 -Fax (715) 828-5902 -Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:27 To: Anderson, Dan; Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE Cc: Quin, Pam; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us); mark@mgilbertlaw.com Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Bill called back and we talked. He said he would write up a proposal of the work being done on the site. Where trenches are going to be dug and machinery enter and exit the property ,where soils will be gathered from and include a statement where they will be back in the spring to ensure final grading has not changed from when the mound was installed and seed the impacted areas. He did say mulch was not very useful this time of year as it usually just washes away in spring. As long as spring runoff does not affect the mound and they agree to be back in the spring to fix any grading impacted by erosion before they seed, I'm ok with this as long as the county agrees. He said a new pump will be installed for the additional lift and pressure required for the mound. This is part of the plan. He said the access road from the east of the property probably was still be needed as they are not allowed to drive within 25 feet of the down hill slope of the mound with machinery. He said Denny would be able to determine this tonight when we speak and is ok with Denny's recommendations concerning this. He seamed very willing in all my requests. I'm glad he finally called. Let's hope it progresses as well as it appears it will. Denny said nothing this week as the sand pits are closed for the holiday. I'll be in touch From: Anderson, Dan Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:55 AM To: Anderson, Dan; 'Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE' Cc: 'Quin, Pam'; 'Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us)'; 'mark@mgilbertlaw.com' Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Denny is stopping by tonight to discuss options. Left a message for Bill to call me. 11 /25/2009 Page 3 of 8 From: Anderson, Dan Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 2:43 PM To: 'Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE' Cc: Quin, Pam; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us); 'mark@mgilbertlaw.com' Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence I have already agreed to letting them cut the access road and agreed the said trees can be removed to allow for this. (I don't like it but I have agreed even though I was told by another source the access road was not needed.) In no way do I want them to perform any work related to this install in a dangerous fashion or in a way that poses a dangerous situation for anyone. I called Bill this morning (and Denny last Wednesday) asking for them to contact me to discuss our situation but neither has called back. I want to discuss the following when either calls. 1. Top soil usage. I have areas on my land where top cover soil can be used from but I still need an agreement of how that area would be repaired. (grading and seeded) So yes, I have thought more about covering the cost of top soil and would like to and have requested to discuss this with the installers to see if my option is acceptable. 2. I still need a written proposal for what is to be done and how. As Pam stated in her last email, this info is usually supplied to the owner as part of the proposal and or bid but in this case, there is no proposal and or bid ( even though I requested it from Bill and Denny on 08-16-08) and have yet to be given any documentation related to the work on my property by the installers. (Not even the required permit). In fact I have not received 1 piece of paper from Bill or Denny as to their intensions on this repair. Bill has never phoned my house since this all started back in 2007. 1 have questions related to how other areas of disturbance will be repaired too like the trench from the current head to the new mound, when will that get graded and seeded? By Leroy's comments, those things are not covered under the states order to conform. I just want to know if Bill intends on doing anything or if that will become a civil matter. 3. My lawyer said I should not sign Denny's waiver. Any signed agreement should include Bill's name, his responsibilities and his signature along with any stipulations defined by Denny. 4. My lawyer said I should open claim on Bill's bonding insurance (if he has insurance). I am requesting his info when he contacts me. 5. My lawyer also gave me a few other recommendations. I wanted to discuss the above with Bill before exploring those options. So to summarize; I am still requiring a written proposal from the installers. I am not signing the waiver for Denny. I am still allowing the installation to continue under the same limitations as stated before (No waiver and bring in dirt }. If they want to use my dirt, I am willing to discuss this with them if they give me a call as I requested. I would like to know answers to my outstanding issues not covered by the states order before the job starts but I will not prevent the system from being installed because of them. If the state has no authority in those issues and Bill refuses to discuss options about them with me, I will take that up with my council and address them in a civil hearing. I expect at minimum 2 business days lead time notice as to the start and completion date(s) before work is to begin. (I want to be hear for the install so no holidays or weekends ) These things can be on the requested proposal. 11/25/2009 Page 4 of 8 From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 12:18 PM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Quin, Pam; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence I spoke to Bill this morning and he informed me that he is ready and willing to get the mound installed. However, he is concerned that access to the property will be limited so as to make the delivery of sand unduly dangerous. He felt that there would be about two dozen small trees that would need to be cut to get trucks into the site safely. He hopes that you can see your way clear to allow access. ! would tend to agree with him that the guys doing the trucking should make the call as to safety when delivering materials to the site. I also mentioned that 1 didn't think too much about borrowing topsoil from the site to cover the mound and that other arrangements should be made. I cannot prohibit him from using materials that are on site but I have to believe that there would be a large area stripped to accomplish proper covering of the system. Have you thought any more about covering some of the cost for some good topsoil cover? I'm sure it would help get this project rolling, provided there are no other issues that pop up. Leroy G. Jansky, CPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 -Office (715) 726-2549 -Fax (715) 828-5902 -Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 7:51 To: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE Cc: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence I understand your points. I understand why Denny is in involved, just don't understand why he's allowed to be a big part of the delays. Civilly he is responsible and that is why he has stake in the replacement system. From the states perspective, Denny is not named on the orders but he was the reason it was not inspected in fal{ 2008, and Denny told me he told Bill he would not do anything on Andersons until a unrelated outstanding invoice between Bill and Denny was settled. They paid Denny 11-13-2009 and Denny was on my property the next Monday. So again, Denny caused ( indirectly through Bill) the delay for all 2009. Just because Bill chooses this sub-contractor and that sub causes the delays should not exonerate Bill from his requirements. Bill could have got a different excavator for the inspection and the inspection would have been done in the fall of 2008 and we would have had all winter to get the plans approved, permit paid, trees cut, agreements with the owner reached, date of completion set. Then system would have been installed and vegetation on the impacted areas growing early in 2009. I agree, the best outcome is for them to install the system this fall yet but you can not fault me for the things I ask. Signing the waiver is not up to me, I have to leave that decision to my lawyer and it's unfair for him to demand it of me the morning of when the work is to start. They had all summer to give this to me so I can have my lawyer review. Because they did not present this to me ahead of time was deliberate; I have to be allowed time to respond to protect myself. This delay is again caused by Denny, not me. You state I should consider signing it to get the ball rolling. The agreement I'm asked to sign is with someone the 11/25/2009 Page 5 of 8 county has no authority over and in signing it, I forfeit my rights related to that persons involvement. Doesn't sound like a wise decision on my part and that is why I'm leaving the decision to sign to my lawyer. The soil issue is not that big of an issue as I lead on. I will allow them to use soil from the property but I want a say in what soils are used and how the area will be repaired. That is not an unfair request. I have asked for an independent estimate for this same job and that excavator said "with a replacement system on property of this size with all the landscaping done already, he would not even bring up scraping soil but include hauling in the cover as part of the estimate" so, it's just another way for the person responsible to cut corners and burden the owner with those costs. My excavator also said he is not sure if an access road is needed. He said he needs to review but it looks like the job could be done without the access road. If the access road is not needed, than it's another un-necessary demand of the responsible parties to save them costs. I will help them with their costs of the replacement if I can have a say in how I help. I don't see that we would be in a pickle because of the 2 reasons above. They are the ones making the demands to complete the order. Demands that are unjust and unrelated to the order. The order can still be accomplished without me agreeing to the demands stated above. I will allow them access to the property to complete the job but the demands stated above would need to be settled someway other than what was proposed to me. (No waiver signed and they haul dirt, done deal ). I was/am completely ready to bare some of the cost on this replacement. In fact I already have invested moneys into this project and expect to incur more costs but for them to tell me (not ask) how I will be helping on their financial end is not cool. Bill's violation fine of $10 per day, that is paid to the state, not me correct? When would that fine begin being applied, 11-25-2008? Does he already owe fines in excess of $3,650 for the already 1 year late in completing the order or is the fine only applicable if it goes to court? I just want to understand all this. Thank you for listening to my side and I hope you understand my arguments. I agree I could be more accommodating to get this done but l think I have already been very accommodating to this point. I understand I am ultimately responsible for my property but I should not be the only one held accountable for the failed system. Adam tested wrong, Bill placed it wrong, Denny bid it wrong, the previous owner hired the wrong people, and the state inspected it wrong. All I did was bought a lemon. If you think I'm being unreasonable, please let me know. I rely heavily on yours and Pam's and Ryan's opinions regarding this project in making my decisions and really appreciate your efforts in getting issue resolved. Thanks again. From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 5:56 PM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Quin, Pam Subject: RE: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Our enforcement process is somewhat complicated and cumbersome. However, the order is technically still valid but I held up on the next step in the process. First for winter conditions, then health issues, next a second verification of the system location, more health issues, and poor October weather. We do not take individuals to court if they are working toward completion, which is difficult to say for this job, but steps were taken like plan review and approval and permit issuance. We would not win anything is the violator 11/2512009 Page 6 of 8 shows he is trying even if it takes a year or more. As I mentioned earlier it would likely take just as long or longer to get a court date set. So in many cases the route we took works better -not in this case however. I am still unclear regarding Denny's involvement here. I suppose if you hired him and he hired Bill than he has a responsibility as the general contractor for the work - I believe. If that ties the two together for the time being that's probably to our advantage. I had assumed that Bill's insurance might kick in for part of the cost but maybe not. We are is a bit of a pickle if you, for some reason, don't authorize them to enter on the property to fix the problem. I the past we have turned around and issued an order to the owner since they are ultimately responsible for what happens on their property. I don't want to do that unless a supervisor says I need to. If for some reason the system doesn't get in this year the order still stands. The greatest threat to Bill if he does not complete the work is that the fine is $10-$1,000 per day of the continued violation. Even at $10 a day the fine would be substantial. Personally, I think Bill will get the work done and he's almost there now. You really should consider some compromise, like purchasing the top soil, to limit site disturbance and tree cutting. This one thing may get the ball rolling. After you consult your attorney you might consider signing the agreement your sent me since it only mentions the system. The agreement would not apply to the county or state. I feel that we can still act independently regarding the system installation at a later date should something pop up - which I doubt. Call if you have questions. I will be in from 0700 to 0830 hrs Thursday then on lay off (reduced work hours) the rest of the week. Leroy G. Jansky, CPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, W/ 54729 (715) 726-2544 -Office (715) 726-2549 -Fax (715) 828-5902 -Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:22 To: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE; Pam Quinn; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Cc: danhome715@baldwin-telecom net Subject: Anderson septic replacement -correspondence Thank you Leroy for your response. I will be contacting Bill to discuss my concerns with him. I need to ask you though, What is the current status related to "the enforcement action to ensure compliance with your orders issued on September 11, 2008, to be completed by November 25, 2008"? All things you demanded of Bili in your official letters related to this replacement have not been met. Because it appears there is activity on this now (a full year after the completion date ), does is mean state attorney general legal enforcement is on hold? What if I don't sign the waiver and the ground freezes before Denny or Bill settle this issue between themselves? Would the order no longer be valid because the owner of the property prevented the installation? Would the orders date of completion be extended for yet another year? (to my knowledge date of completion is sti 1111-25-2008. ) All delays in meeting the orders date of completion have been to Bills benefit with no recourse for the delays. 11/25/2009 Page 7 of 8 ****~* Just some thoughts I wrote out. Nowhere is it stated in the order that it is the owner's responsibility to provide the soil to cover the system. If they want the soil from my yard, it's only common sense and courtesy they would ask me and agree to my conditions to use it. (Like where to get it from and how that area would look after the job is done ). Besides, at the inspection, Leroy stated "and an extra load of dirt spread out on the inspection site would be a nice gesture". I know you can not enforce a nice gesture but it indicated to me soil was going to be brought in to conform to the order. That does not appear to be the case. I still need to talk with my lawyer but I don't see how he would advise me to sign the waiver Denny demands to begin the work. In my mind, Denny's involvement in this project is with Bill not me. Bill should be signing the waiver. Besides, If Denny refuses to do the work because I don't sign the waiver; it is immaterial in relation to the order to repair. Bill is still responsible. If Bill hired someone else to perform the excavating, I'm almost positive that excavator would not ask me to sign such a waiver. I will be asking for a written proposal or statement of work because, as you state, the county can not demand anything related to the replacement other than that the job is done in accordance to the laws. I need to make sure "getting the job done" does not cause more problems for myself. (They install a $8000 mound but cause $10000 worth of landscaping damages during the install ), does not make any sense and I could see that happening. Under the circumstances, I don't think asking for a statement of work is a lot to ask. If that prevents the order from being performed, something is very wrong. It is prudent for me as the property owner to ensure a clear understanding of what will take place (give all that has taken place thus far ), even if the state does not demand it. Bill and Denny did not even try to discuss with me before yesterday (less than 24 hours from when they wanted to start) that they would need to take soils from other parts of the yard and the need to build an access road. Both of which I had no prior knowledge would be needed and both are not desirable to the value of my property. I don't think what I'm asking for is inappropriate and should not impact the states order to conform. Thanks again for all the help. I will let you know how my conversation with Bill goes. From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:00 AM To: Anderson, Dan; Pam Quinn; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Cc: danhome715@baldwin-telecom.net Subject: RE: septic Thanks for the update. In my opinion, it would be most appropriate and reasonable for the contractor to explain how the work will be done and what property disruption will likely occur. However, this is not an onsite system code issue and would be something you, as the owner, need to address before any work begins. Written proposa{s for many onsite system instaNations are likely never completed. The contractors we are dealing with may be of that mold but I am not sure for sure. Regarding work being done on your property by Schumaker and Bjornstad, if you decide not to allow them to do the work then you only course of action would be a personal litigation for damages. The only authority the Department has is to require the work be completed at the plumber's own expense. In other words, they do the corrective work. A plumber could choose to contract out to another licensed person but we cannot make them ll /25/2009 Page 8 of 8 pay for someone else to do the work. I don't believe that I have anything scheduled for Monday or Tuesday next week and will wait to visit your site until one of those days -probably Tuesday. I hope that neither one of these guys deer hunt. Leroy G. Jansky, CPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 -Office (715) 726-2549 -Fax (715) 828-5902 -Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:17 To: Pam Quinn; Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Cc: danhome715@baldwin-telecom.net Subject: FW: septic Denny stopped by this morning and gave me the attached to sign before he begins any work related to the septic replacement. I told him I would review this with my lawyer and let him know. Being this is not signed, he has postponed starting this until he hears back from me. 1. - I have no proposal from anyone on what will be done and how it will be accomplished (How will this replacement impact my current property). (Do I have a say?) 2. - I will not allow for further disruption of any soils other than to the replacement site unless someone can assure me in writing these disturbed areas will be repaired to my liking. 3. - I will not be exonerating Bjornstad and Son of "any future responsibilities or liabilities of the system" unless advised by my lawyer. His involvement in the project is between him and Bill Schoemaker. 4. - I will not allow this project to progress on my property until the above issues are settled and signed off by myself unless ordered by St.Croix county or advised by my lawyer. I hope to meet with my lawyer today but have not yet been able to schedule an appointment. I will let you know how this processes. 11/25/2009 f Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:00 AM To: Anderson, Dan; Pam Quinn; Ryan Yarrington Cc: danhome715@baldwin-telecom.net Subject: RE: septic Thanks for the update. In my opinion, it would be most appropriate and reasonable for the contractor to explain how the work will be done and what property disruption will likely occur. However, this is not an onsite system code issue and would be something you, as the owner, need to address before any work begins. Written proposals for many onsite system installations are likely never completed. The contractors we are dealing with may be of that mold but I am not sure for sure. Regarding work being done on your property by Schumaker and Bjornstad, if you decide not to allow them to do the work then you only course of action would be a personal litigation for damages. The only authority the Department has is to require the work be completed at the plumber's own expense. In other words, they do the corrective work. A plumber could choose to contract out to another licensed person but we cannot make them pay for someone else to do the work. I don't believe that I have anything scheduled for Monday or Tuesday next week and will wait to visit your site until one of those days - probably Tuesday. I hope that neither one of these guys deer hunt. Leroy G. Jansky, CPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:17 To: Pam Quinn; Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Cc: danhome715@baldwin-telecom net Subject: FW: septic Denny stopped by this morning and gave me the attached to sign before he begins any work related to the septic replacement. I told him I would review this with my lawyer and let him know. Being this is not signed, he has postponed starting this until he hears back from me. 1. - I have no proposal from anyone on what will be done and how it will be accomplished ( How will this replacement impact my current property). ( Do I have a say?) 2. - I will not allow for further disruption of any soils other than to the replacement site unless someone can assure me in writing these disturbed areas will be repaired to my liking. 3. - I will not_be exonerating Bjornstad and Son of "any future responsibilities or ~. liabilities of the system" unless advised by my lawyer. His involvement in the project is between him and Bi11 Schoemaker. 4. - I will not allow this project to progress on my property until the above issues are settled and signed off by myself unless ordered by St.Croix county or advised by my lawyer. I hope to meet with my lawyer today but have not yet been able to schedule an appointment. I will let you know how this processes. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 2 Page 1 of 1 Pam Quinn From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:17 AM To: Pam Quinn; Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE; Ryan Yarrington Cc: danhome715@baldwin-telecom.net Subject: FW: septic Attachments: septic.pdf Denny stopped by this morning and gave me the attached to sign before he begins any work related to the septic replacement. I told him I would review this with my lawyer and let him know. Being this is not signed, he has postponed starting this until he hears back from me. 1. - I have no proposal from anyone on what will be done and how it will be accomplished (How will this replacement impact my current property). (Do I have a say?) 2. - I will not allow for further disruption of any soils other than to the replacement site unless someone can assure me in writing these disturbed areas will be repaired to my liking. 3. - I will not be exonerating Bjornstad and Son of "any future responsibilities or liabilities of the system" unless advised by my lawyer. His involvement in the project is between him and Bill Schoemaker. 4. - I will not allow this project to progress on my property until the above issues are settled and signed off by myself unless ordered by St.Croix county or advised by my lawyer. I hope to meet with my lawyer today but have not yet been able to schedule an appointment. I will let you know how this processes. 11 / 17/2009 ~~~ ~~~ .1 {.. r ~' r~ ~ i ~ ~3 ~ c~ r n s to ~ ~r=~~r~e ~~~~ ~-ir~c~~~-rt, V~'1 5441 ~ ~' ~ : ~ r ,r ,. ~r~~aosa[ 5ubmttte+~ T`o: ~ ;~_ ~e±e _ _ _. ._.. _ __---_. --- ----------- i = ~ /J `~ ' -~ ~ ~Sr = lob 7warne* 1~~/~'_l~ct.:.__.,>-. ~~-----~----------- _$ ~~~.; ~ r - .. ;.:''y __ . __ State _ -- _. _ ._. - _ ... _ _ is ,., oar * ~v c+, ;xntrr e, , ,~n: ~...;,,--Y~,,.,. v~:.w..,.,.. ,~.~.< , ~ ..,,, _:3_..w....,a;:~.7m.,rs~~~,,:..-,:,msi~,..w~ac,+,~..sm~~. _ c; i~Mi~" SFFCs'~i~~r~TIG?PJ~S aN'~ ~S7i^.d~iT:`i• F~~R~ __ ,. ~... _~_ ____ ~/. ,~.' - ~ _' c__ ~ .,_._ - - f --_. r, ~x ~ t T,; , E ~ ~~1~ :, a _. -,, , , r - _ ~.~__.__ _.___._ _ __..._._..~----~----.,._ ~ t•. __ _---- S ~.. n; Dr<7 UC3SB t•~ itsrru ~.~~ td tlt?r anu md7@rials °-°~ COm pi@ttr ^. aCCi?rdanGE' wtih tlt F, a5bvg SpecflGat20R5, {or 110 sum Ot: ~t;;i~ars ;;; '; with payment to be made as follows: ~; z _. - _ .~. rn-it-rial is c7uarante2rt tc~ o~. as speufie~s. ,d•il work tc~ bf ;ompieted .„ ~ '«ortmaniike manner according to stanaard practices. itHr;~twn ,~ ~i e. v;afiicn from a'kx,ve specifications invr~Ivin~ !-~tta ~ asts w`~l! be exetuteo only upon written orders, dnrj wi11 ronttngc°n? a nn strikes, accidents or delays beyond our ~l .~ ecira charr~c aver ino above the estimate All dgreemen z - p - wr ++ort s are tuli cnv d b Workmen's Compensation +~ -.,,•. ' xwner tc~ Garry tire, tornado and outer necessary insuran~P. ~- t#r Y ~i' Y ~~.._ --- iPt S~3tanC :~ ~ Authorizer :;ignaturs~ ~. _ _ _ __.__------- p. ~" • ,; >-„ n 7~ a; .a - '~.y: 'ax "nor :ce,:,*ed within dayz. v . ~ ~ r~ .. -,~_ .vY;w.saSi..R:.. .. -ix..a_ ~N,itrz^.h ~.~..,f .-_.:~oi'.i'.ilo'iMn®i'.ie:W:iiieK " '. _.,.-..~:.1.~'iW~+;t+:eTi~c/'ff+A:Y..i:^.i9it.~Y-...wSFtkiV~^+['a:::.'YM2C.`.Kci'tL XI^IR.~::d:, ~. i`he abcv~ prices, specificafiens and conditions are s,,tisfactory dnr sre Hereby accepted_ You are authorized to do the. work ,, sp~'citier/, r3aymrn} wilt be merle as outiinecf above. {~ SiOndturr3 __ '----------_-_--- t0~~r'~TBG: Signature _ ----_ _._._..------ - --- ---- --- ` _,,~#., - -... _~...• _.,we.,~ :tea.". - --wtmnwswi~.+oca~er °~. Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 5:55 PM To: Anderson, Dan; Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Mound Project I will not be able to make it to your site tomorrow (11/17) because I am doing training in Stevens Point all day. However, I may stop by on the 18th to see how things went. To answer your question regarding contaminated soil, I don't feel there will be any hazard in a few days. Once any discharge is stopped the air will oxidize organic matter and the temperature and UV radiation will kind of sanitize the land surface. This is what we expect to happen at DNR approved land spreading sites where sewage is applied. Just don't eat any soil from that area until next year - just kidding. It is common to use topsoil from the site to cover a mound. However, quite a bit of area would need to be disturbed to do this so this seems impractical considering your lot size. I know that you have been waiting for a long time and expecting a largely paid for replacement system but you may want to intervene in this regards and get 4-6 loads of good top soil for the mound and other yard repairs. Thank goodness the weather improved and things dried out a bit. Conditions should be relatively decent for the installation. Neither the county or state can make a person repair damaged landscaping caused by digging backhoe pits, etc. I wish we could but it isn't in the rules. In retrospect, I would NOT handle this situation the same way. A lot of issues qot in the way and slowed things down. At least Bill didn't die on us because the department has never taken on an estate to enforce an order for correction. Hopefully, things will go just fine tomorrow and we will finally put this baby to bed. See you Wednesday sometime. I will be on the road tomorrow at 0530 to 0730 hrs and again from 1600 to 1800 hrs for phone calls. The time between we are doing training and I will be unavailable. Leroy G. Jansky, CPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Ce11 From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 15:23 To: Pam Quinn Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Mound Project Bill and Denny were out to the house today and said they will begin tomorrow ( 11-17-09 ). Denny said he has to build a road from the eastern edge of my property through wooded area because the slope is too steep from the northern street side to dump sand from. He said he would be using topsoil from my property to cover the new system with. I asked him if that is where he was getting the soil to fix the area in yard too and he said probably, he does not and was not expecting to haul black dirt so all top soil was coming from the property. 1 I remember Leroy stating some dirt on the inspection site would need to be brought in and spread to clean up the yard. I reviewed the documents I have on this and don't see this stated anywhere. I guess I'm stuck with that one. In hind sight, I would not have allowed the inspection if they were going to leave my yard in that shape for a year and then not fix it. So now I have more trees that will need to be removed and soil from my land has to be used to cover the new system. Not to mention having a new roadway into my yard that I was not asked about or have any say whether it goes in there. I also suspect there is nothing going to be done at the site of the replacement system in 2003 ) in the form of fixing where the ground has settled and or shifted and or run off had cut paths in the soil because of the improper system and it's failure. I will be incurring landscaping costs to repair these things. ~_~_~_* Repair inspection site(s). Re-landscape 2003 failed system site. ( run off marks, settling marks, ect... ) Re- landscaping the new road where the eastern access is required to put in the mound. Is there any concern for the area where the run off has been going? ( contaminated soils )• In all, I'm and very please there is progress being made but not please at how it's progressing. He is only 1 year late in complying to the order give and he has occurred no penalty for that year delay, that I have seen. Pam has said she will be out tomorrow @ 10:00 to review the site. Thanks Pam and Leroy for everything. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.USJ Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:55 AM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Mound Project NO he has not been in to pay the remaining $400 for the replacement POWYS permit. As soon as he does, we can give him the go ahead! Ryan will see Denny and Bill today at a POWYS installation here in Hudson and will let them know you and Leroy are on communicating with us on this daily. He may have his license and ability to work disappear if he keeps procrastinating:) Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016 715-386-4680 pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us<mailto:pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us> From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:36 AM To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Cc: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Mound Project Left message on Denny's cell this morning. 2 Got Bill's cell today ( 651-260-5459 ) and he said Denny is finishing up a job today and could begin to haul sand tomorrow with install Wednesday. Has the permit been picked up yet? Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:51 AM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Quin, Pam Subject: RE: Mound Project Sorry for not responding sooner but we have been under a work hours reduction for a couple of weeks now and also had training to do out of the area. If I can be at the site when the work is done I will be there. Right now I am in work status on Nov 16-18 but will be in Pewaukee on the 17th all day doing training. From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 11:28 AM To: Anderson, Dan; Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Cc: Quin, Pam Subject: RE: Mound Project Called Denny and left a message on his cell. Called Bill, his wife answered. Said Bill and Denny talked this morning. She stated next week is full but they were definitely doing it the week after. She said yes, the week of November 16 thru the 20th for sure. If this holds true, and weather is good and the stars align, will the county and or state be on site? F.Y.I. Long term forecast shows rain the weekend of 11-14- and 11-15 and average lows below freezing for the remainder of the year. Talk about cutting it close. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Anderson, Dan Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:45 PM To: 'Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE' Cc: Quin, Pam Subject: RE: Mound Project No one has been out or have called. To my knowledge, Denny has not been to the site since the inspection this spring. Bill was last here marking the trees to be removed. ( first part of October ) Supposed to be raining the rest of the week and into next. What's the next step, wait some more? Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv 3 Office: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 2:00 PM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Quin, Pam Subject: RE: Mound Project I talked to Bill this morning about 8 a.m. and asked him to get in touch with Denny to start hauling sand. I pointed out the weather won't get any better and told him I'd like to know when he starts so I can maybe be there. He said that he would contact Denny. Leroy G. Jansky, CPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 13:21 To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE; Pam Quinn Subject: FW: Mound Project Called Denny today and left a message on his cell. Was anyone been able to get a status on this? Has the permit been submitted? It's supposed to rain the majority of the week with the project due to be completed on Friday. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:08 PM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Mound Project Since I haven't talked with them about anything to do with this project recently, I guess she means from last spring's on-site? Hope there's progress next week... Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016 715-386-4680 pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us<mailto:pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us> From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@Fiserv.com] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:58 PM To: Anderson, Dan; Pam Quinn Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE; Ryan Yarrington Subject: RE: Mound Project 4 F.Y.I. I received a call from Bills wife ( Cheryl ) returning my call. She said Bill is ready to drop off the permit request but needs to find the money for it. He also needs to get with Denny to see when he's available to begin delivering sand. She said Pam was aware of his situation in regards to the permit. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Anderson, Dan Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:58 AM To: 'Pam Quinn' Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE; Ryan Yarrington Subject: RE: Mound Project Leroy's letter stated this plans should be obtained by Wednesday 10-14. I spoke with him on the 13th and he said he would be doing this tomorrow. I called Denny and left another message on his cell. I called Bill and left a message at his house too. I don't expect a return call from either. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:45 AM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE; Ryan Yarrington Subject: RE: Mound Project Bi11 has not submitted the permit application, but has submitted other plans in the past week for permits and installed a system for Glen Johnson on Wednesday. Physical limitations do not seem to be a factor anymore, just monetary. Rain and sleet on Thursday didn't help the situation for installation, either. Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016 715-386-4680 pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us<mailto:pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us> From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:39 AM To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Cc: Pam Quinn; Ryan Yarrington; danhome715@baldwin-telecom net Subject: RE: Mound Project No word from anyone yet so I called them. Called Denny and left a message on his cell. Talked with Bi11, he said he would be pulling my permit probably tomorrow. He said he spoke with Denny on 10-06 or 10-07 and Denny said he would start hauling sand in when the ground dried out enough to drive through the ditch. He didn't think he could get through the ditch with all the rain we had lately. ( Evidently the last they spoke was when it was still rain. ) 5 I hope this project will progress rapidly in the next 9 days. In you letter you asked for a time table in the project. Have you received this yet? Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:24 AM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Quin, Pam; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Subject: RE: Mound Project Letter sent today is attached. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:36 To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Mound Project Thanks. I called Denny again today and left another message. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:01 AM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Quin, Pam; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Subject: RE: Mound Project Not progressing well at all. However, we have plenty of time to get the job done - the site should dry out for a few days anyway. I will send a letter out today. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office 6 (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 16:10 To: Pam Quinn Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Mound Project Spoke with Bill today, he had not spoken with Denny in quite a while. He had no information on when anything would happen. I called Denny and left another message. Bill said he would also call Denny to get a status. Not progressing well, is it. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 12:40 PM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Mound Project You're doing everything to remove any impediments (or excuses) for getting this project done - Bi11 has not yet submitted plans and application with fees for a sanitary permit! Luckily the weather is still cooperating for a potential installation. Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016 715-386-4680 pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us<mailto:pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us> From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 12:18 PM To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Cc: Pam Quinn; danhome715@baldwin-telecom.net Subject: RE: Mound Project Still no contact from Bill or Denny. Called both today, left voice messages. Tree's have been removed, done on Wednesday, 09-30. No sand delivered yet. Waiting... Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Anderson, Dan Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:09 AM To: Anderson, Dan; 'Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE' Cc: 'Quin, Pam'; 'danhome715@baldwin-telecom.net' Subject: RE: Mound Project Bill was out yesterday and marked the trees. ( I didn't see or hear from him but they are 7 marked ) Denny said he could start hauling sand tomorrow ( possibly ) and he'll see when he can begin, most likely next week. ( No firm date ). Pam mentioned, Bill has not ~~submit the approved plans for our review & approval for a replacement permit and a card to be posted before he can do the work". Can we contact Bill and make sure this is done if work is to begin soon? Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Anderson, Dan Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:28 AM To: 'Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE' Cc: Quin, Pam Subject: RE: Mound Project Only the dead one I decided to take down. Got a hold of Bill yesterday, he said he was wide open all week to do the job and was surprised that Denny hadn't stopped by yet to mark the trees. So now, were waiting on Denny. Called him yesterday and again this morning, he did not answer. If I do get to talk to him, I will tell him to give me a hard date when he will start. If he doesn't get out to mark the trees before that date, I guess he will need to take care of them. And the saga continues. Not to push the subject but a real date Bill has to have this completed I think would be helpful. Then Denny and Bill would have something to work towards. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:13 AM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Mound Project Don't laugh too hard. Any tree removal going on? Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 20:14 To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Mound Project 8 Gotta laugh. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:35 PM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Mound Project When do the Keystone Cops arrive? Hopefully they will get their "sewage" together and get out there. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:02 To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Cc: Quin, Pam; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Subject: RE: Mound Project Ncbody showed. I called both Bill and Denny. Bills wife answered and questioned why Bill would need to mark which tree's were in the way. Denny said he forgot to stop but didn't know where the system was going anyway and said he would call Bill and try and get over today, probably with Bill or Jim, the mounds designer. Denny expected the site to be staked out already. Nope, only Schmidt's flags from his soil test are out there. Nothing from Bill's crew. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Fiserv Office: 651-286-6638 From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE (mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:57 AM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Quin, Pam; Yarrington, Ryan (ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us) Subject: Mound Project Bi11 called me a few minutes ago and said that Denny will be by tonight on his way home (apparently he lives out by you) and will look the situation over as far as trees go. I guess that you were going to cut down the trees that are in the way. Bill said if the trees are done that they will "likely" be by next week to do the work. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce 9 Page 1 of 3 Pam Quinn From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:40 PM To: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE; Pam Quinn Cc: danhome715@baldwin-telecom.net Subject: RE: Mound Plans No I don't. Who is the general contractor? Last I heard (from Denny ), he was not going to be asked. I have had no contact from anyone (besides you via email) since the inspection on May 27tH Will you be setting a date of completion soon? F.Y.I. It's clear to me he is ignoring this issue and does not plan to comply with your repair order issued on 09-11-08, due to be completed by 11-25-08. I know that deadline was set before the request for another onsite inspection but I feel without a clear deadline and consequences detailed from your office, I don't think Bill will take any action. My lawyer said I should let the state handle this but I can't wait another year for his compliance. This issue was reported to Denny and Bill 28 months ago and the only thing done was 40 yards of dirt spread on top of where it is boiling out of the ground (which I paid 650.00 to have done by Denny) and a new soil test also paid for by me. I will be asking my lawyer to begin civil action against all parties involved. From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:28 AM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Mound Plans Well there's been nothing in the mail or on voice mail as of today. I will telephone Bill sometime today or tomorrow and speak with him personally. I might also try to get a hold of the general contractor too but don't have a telephone number - do you? Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 -Office (715) 726-2549 -Fax (715) 828-5902 -Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:59 To: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE 8/25/2009 Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:36 AM To: Pam Quinn; Ryan Yarrington Cc: dan.anderson@fiserv.com Subject: Mound Plans Attachments: Schumaker5.pdf •r-'.4 Schumaker5.pdf (26 KB) I still don't see any mound plans approved for the Anderson project as of today. I called Jim Thompson and he said the plans are done an in Schumaker's hands. However, Schumaker was back in the operating room again a week ago or so to get two more stints (sp?) installed. Anyway he needs to get the plans submitted so I generated another letter to him as attached. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell 1 Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:35 AM To: Pam Quinn Cc: dan.anderson@fiserv.com Subject: RE: Anderson Onsite I don't have a big problem with waiting until late March or early April but not much beyond that since plan review is necessary for this job and we want to limit inconvenience and cost to the owner as much as possible. The reality of the matter is that a mound most likely couldn't be installed until May sometime anyway so a little delay in doing the onsite is not as critical as some other situations. Maybe we should set a tentative date now. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Pam Quinn [PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.U5] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 7:34 To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: FW: Anderson Onsite As long as Dan is OK with waiting, it would probably make s ense? Let him know if you concur. Happy New Year! Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 6:39 AM To: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Anderson Onsite I wouldn't mind if the inspection was delayed until closer to when actual work can take place. I am not looking forward to seeing the holes in the yard for months. Maybe we should plan for March or April? You suggestions are appreciated. Thanks Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Senior Programmer/Analyst Office 651-286-6638 dan.anderson@fiserv.com -----Original Message----- From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] 2 Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 8:12 AM To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: FW: Anderson Onsite Dan, I'm sorry this is such a fiasco for resolving your situation, I hope we can get it done ASAP - only silver lining is that the actual work needs to be done in the spring. Hope your water conservation efforts and awareness of the system limitations prevents other problems; we (county) will not be penalizing you if any surface discharge occurs while we are waiting to get the inspection completed. Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Yarrington Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 3:05 PM To: 'Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE' Cc: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Anderson Onsite I just spoke with the excavator and he has to cancel due to potential snow coming that he will have to plow. I will have Pam get in touch with you to reschedule. Ryan Yarrington Zoning Technician St. Croix County 1101 Carmichael Rd. Hudson, WI 54016 715-386-4680 ryany@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:46 PM To: Ryan Yarrington Subject: Anderson Onsite Ryan, do you know if Pam and I are scheduled to dig up Anderson's system tomorrow (30 Dec 08)? Pam was going to check with the excavator and Bill Schumaker. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715)` 828-5902 - Cell 2 Pam Quinn From: Pam Quinn Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:16 PM To: 'Anderson, Dan' Subject: FW: schedule for Friday 12/19? Happy Holidays - we may get this done before 2009! Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Pam Quinn Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:11 PM To: 'Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE' Subject: RE: schedule for Friday 12/19? I'll notify Bill, Denny, and Dan Anderson that they will have to accommodate your schedule - I may be available on the 30th, but not the 29th. Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.govt Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:33 PM To: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: schedule for Friday 12/19? Not well. Have been interrupted too often. I will not be available this week and likely not until the 29th or 30th. Let's plan for one of those two days barring extreme climatic events. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Pam Quinn [PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:29 To: Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov. Subject: schedule for Friday 12/19? Just checking on whether or not to call Bill & Denny about doing the excavation at Anderson's on Friday. Forecast is for snow later today and tomorrow, temps in the 20's (wind chill unknown). How's your presentation coming along? 1 Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:14 AM To: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm My orders and recommendations are based mostly on both your and Tom Schmitt's observations. What you guys reported makes sense to me but in court I cannot testify that I actually observed anything in this regards. It took me quite a while to decipher and correlate all the soil reports, inspection reports and as-built, and the number of documents makes all this difficult to explain. It may be best to nail this thing down air-tight with an investigation focused on the system locations and elevations and whether or not we have massive sandy loam till near and at the depth/below the newer soil dispersal cells as installed. I have been in court enough to know that attorneys and stir up so much irrelevant information that important information gets lost. If I were to continue with my second step of the enforcement procedure (and I will) we can't expect anything to be done until late spring anyway. No matter what we do now we'll be digging through frozen soil. If things work out like we believe they will, we will be in a much better position for litigation should that even be necessary. My opinion is that when Schumaker sees for himself that the violations exist he'll move to correct them. If he doesn't our confidence level will all that higher should we go to court. Lastly, I cannot guarantee when we could actually schedule a court hearing. I have had cases that have taken well over a year just to get a court date set. Therefore, we could be ahead time wise if Schumaker agrees he made a mistake and takes care of corrections. All that said, we should still try to do two soil pits: One to verify system locations and one to verify soil conditions below the newer cells. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Pam Quinn [PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 8:15 To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: FW: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm Do you want to proceed without the follow-up test pit? Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 8:10 AM To: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm 1 Remember, this inspection is not required in the counties eyes. I'm temped to say, you had your chance to prove something with an inspection dig but you have postponed the inspection 3 times already. It is now too late in the season. We will now let the court decide what you should do". I am looking for and following yours and Leroy's recommendations. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Senior Programmer/Analyst Office 651-286-6638 dan.anderson@fiserv.com -----Original Message----- From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:56 AM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm No, it's not the least funny - I definitely confirmed with Bill that Friday would work, I even noted it on my calendar so that it would be documented. They must have "talked" while they were tipping a few at Willow River Inn.... Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:59 AM To: Pam Quinn; Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm This is becoming comical. I can see how important this is for them. I guess we'll see you guys sometime next week, maybe. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Senior Programmer/Analyst Office 651-286-6638 dan.anderson@fiserv.com -----Original Message----- From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:47 AM To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Cc: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm Importance: High 2 Stop!! I called Denny and he was under the impression we'd be postponed until next week after the storm!~~~ Unbelievable! Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:37 AM To: Pam Quinn; Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm In than case I'm on my way. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Pam Quinn [PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:30 To: Anderson, Dan Cc: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm Last I heard we are "go" Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Anderson, Dan [mailto:dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:14 AM To: Pam Quinn; Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm Any word on if we are digging here today? Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Senior Programmer/Analyst Office 651-286-6638 dan.anderson@fiserv.com -----Original Message----- From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:12 PM To: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Cc: Anderson, Dan Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm OK - I asked Denny to double-check the utilities markers, to see if they were flagged or 3 .. . not. If they only spray painted on the ground, it will be hard to find! He was pretty sure none of the major gas/electric/phone lines were on that side of the house, but we don't want to find out the hard way! Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 3:44 PM To: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm This is getting to be a pain. Let's find out if Digger's Hotline has marked the site. I might be available on Friday but usually after travel for training I have a short day on Friday. Let's see if we can do it at 10 a.m. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Pam Quinn [PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 15:04 To: Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov. Cc: Anderson, Dan Subject: Tuesday's on-site postponed due to storm Denny just called me and said he doesn't want to move the machinery onto the site until after this storm passes. Leroy, you are unavailable due to classes in Stevens Point on Wed. & Thursday - shall we see what Friday brings or will you just be getting back? Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us<mailto:pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us> 4 Pam Quinn ~, „~ Mme- ~bs3 From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 8:59 AM To: Anderson, Dan; Pam Quinn Subject: Onsite and Orders For Correction Yes, we are digging a soil pit to appease the installer and general contractor, but it also should prove to them that the system is in violation and that leads to zero defense and hopefully corrections as soon as possible next year. The orders have been issued by the State Department of Commerce, Safety and Buildings Division. I was intending to wait with processing the second letter until after the onsite, but that has been delayed twice. I believe that I will still do that since a second letter is definitely in order but I want to base it on the newest information possible. The timeline for replacing the system will be adjusted to a reasonable date in late May. Forcing anything before then may lead to other problems and a poor job. What we could expect is to have plans and permits in hand well before the deadline to complete the work. I cannot, nor can the county, address landscaping for the test pits. It is unlikely they will be finished other than rough this winter. I would hope that Schumaker will take care of everything when the mound is installed and graded, seeded and mulched. This can be discussed with all concerned later. You need to remember that we only deal with the code violations and getting a compliant system installed. Other property damage and repair is not covered under the orders unless it somehow affects the system design or operation. It may be time to contact your own attorney if you have concerns that the order to replace the system does not cover items you feel are related to the investigation and repair. - Keep a list of events, letters, telephone notes, receipts, photos, etc., to prove your case. Hope to see you all next week. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 8:59 To: Pam Quinn; Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE Subject: RE: Onsite message error We are digging an inspection hole to appease Denny and Bill. The County ( Leroy ), stated he does not need another dig to proceed with his corrective action order. Therefore, these delays should not effect the counties time line set for resolution of this issue. In the "notice of Violations and orders" letter received on 10-24, it was stated the "installation of the correction" be completed by the compliance date 11-25-08. I would assume the county continue along it's time line for compliance. The compliance Page 1 of 2 Pam Quinn From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:00 AM To: Pam Quinn; Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov Subject: RE: Onsite message error We are digging an inspection hole to appease Denny and Bill. The County ( Leroy ), stated he does not need another dig to proceed with his corrective action order. Therefore, these delays should not effect the counties time line set for resolution of this issue. In the "notice of Violations and orders" letter received on 10-24, it was stated the "installation of the correction" be completed by the compliance date 11-25-08. I would assume the county continue along it's time line for compliance. The compliance date of 11-25 has passed so the next step should now be taken, regardless if an inspection dig is still pending or not because the inspection is NOT required by the county. On 11-03-08 I gave the ok for an inspection dig and to this date, no inspection has been performed. I expect all parties involved to be present for the inspection. ( Myself, Denny, Bill, Adam, Pam, Leroy and possibly the county inspector that signed off on the 2003 system ) I have been delayed by Bill and Denny for over a year now. I will allow an inspection dig to happen if the Leroy thinks it will help but I don't want anything to delay the counties actions for resolution. The other thing I am worried about is, who will repair my yard ( ground settling and sod ) in the area of the inspection dig and any ground disruptions caused by the inspection dig? If the county does not need an inspection to proceed, I will require something stating Denny and/or Bill and / or the county return in the spring ( 2009 ) to repair ( grading and sod) the areas affected by the .inspection dig. I am worried about the inspection now that there is frost in the ground. F.Y.I. Diggers hotline has yet to be out. Please reply with your responses. Thank you again for all your help. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Senior Programmer/Analyst Office 651-286-6638 dan.anderson@fiserv.com -----Original Message----- From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US~ Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:47 AM To: Anderson, Dan Subject: FW: Onsite message error 12/2/2008 Page 2 of 2 We keep having to adjust to Denny's availability with equipment...he couldn't make it today and now we have to postpone until next week:-( Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Pam Quinn Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:46 AM To: 'Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE' Subject: RE: Onsite message error I will let Bill and Denny know that they must make time next week - they will have to work around your schedule! Tuesday works well for me, also. Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamq@co.saint-croix.wi.us -----Original Message----- From: Jansky, Leroy G - COMMERCE [mailto:Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:43 AM To: Pam Quinn Subject: Onsite message error Got my Wednesdays and Thursdays mixed up. I am not available on Wednesday or Thursday. Revision: Looks like next week will work on Monday, Tuesday (p.m.). I am out of town again for POWYS classes in Stevens Point on Wednesday and Thursday. I think I'd prefer Tuesday at 1:00 p.m. I may have a teleconference at 9:30 to 11 that day but sometimes they are cancelled and may be able to show up earlier. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWYS Wastewater Specialist Wisconsin Dept. of Commerce Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce Street Suite 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 (715) 726-2544 - Office (715) 726-2549 - Fax (715) 828-5902 - Cell 12/2/2008 Page 1 of 1 Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:55 AM To: Pam Quinn; 'dan.anderson@fiserv.com' Subject: Onsite for Tuesday, 25 Nov 08 I believe inspection our intent is two-fold on Tuesday. First, we need to verify previous observations by the county, in the presence of the installer, regarding the location of the two dispersal cells. If the determination is that the two cells overlap or that separation distances between cells don't meet code minimums we have a clear violation and a need for correction. The corrective action is to replace the cell(s). However, we won't allow the unless the replacement cells are correctly sized and installed in compliant soils. So this leads us to the second part of the investigation pertaining to soil suitability that appears centered on what the soil application rate should be. I have already stated that I felt Adam Schumaker did not report is finding correctly based on other information I have for this site and the general area. I will make a final determination based on my own observations on Tuesday. This will likely require at least one additional soil pit probably in the vicinity of Adam's B-1. I'm not sure I want to dig into the newer system because it may be real messy and not provide any meaningful information anyway. There is no test we can perform in the system that we can't do nearby the cell. If it is shown that the new cells meet setback standards and that only the soil application rate is in question, cannot order Adam to do anything. I believe that it would become a civil matter between the owner and Adam and/or the General Contractor. The owner would work through his own attorney in this regards. See you all on Tuesday. Pam: Please contact Adam to inform him of our investigation and that he should be present. I assume Bill will be there. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist 13 E. Spruce Street, Suite 103 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 leroy.jansky@vvisconsin.gov 715.726.2544 office 715.726.2549 fax 715.828.5902 cell 11!21 /2008 Page 1 of 2 Pam Quinn From: Anderson, Dan [dan.anderson@fiserv.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:35 AM To: Pam Quinn Subject: RE: On-site with Leroy Jansky Thank you. I did receive the letter from Bill's lawyer. Thanks for that too. We will not be digging anywhere that may effect the current system ability (however limited) to work, correct? So do we have the things needed to prove any point either side wi11 bring up on Tuesday? ( Old system, distance from last pipe to where rock bed should end.) ( allowed distance from edge of old bed to edge of infiltrate chamber ) ( proof of fill in area by elevation readings from 1986 to 2003 ) ( will Adam be on site?) (Can we bring documentation from other locations around my house that prove the soils Schmidt found? I talked to (another septic guy, Ben I think), and he said he knew 3 or 4 other homes in my area all have had to have mounds installed based on new soil reports. What I don't want is more questions to come out of the dig on Tuesday that need to be researched to find the answers. If the hole is open, let's get everything answered that will be needed then. Bills letter says he does not know why the system is failing. If the boring we do on Tuesday proves he is not over the old system, what could we do (while were there) to prove what is wrong with it? Another question I have, how will we know where to dig? If we don't know the actual location or angle of the old bed, we could dig in a spot that proves Bill is not over the old system but if we dug 15 feet south, we would have hit the old one. How will we know where the best spot is, or do we dig a few spots? A few observations I want to mention: Say the system is not over the old and it is not proven to be in fill. Who is at fault? Adam - We know the soil report is wrong. Bill - We think the design and location were wrong and he is the responsible party (in the counties eyes) Denny -The job was billed through his company so the above persons were his sub-contractors. County - I know the county is partially responsible for approving the 2003 system when the above conditions for my area were known. The only one in this mess that has not been proven to be at fault to this point is me. Yet, It feels like it could go Bills way on Tuesday and I will be stuck holding the bag. Tuesday should be a reveling day. Thanks again Pam. Dan Anderson IP Capture Development Senior Programmer/Analyst Office 651-286-6638 dan.anderson@fiserv.com __ From: Pam Quinn [mailto:PamQ@CO.Saint-Croix.WI.US] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:44 AM To: Anderson, Dan 1 I /24/2008 Page 2 of 2 Subject: On-site with Leroy Jansky In case you haven't been kept in the loop by Bill or Denny, they scheduled a time for Leroy to look at the soils & POWYS locations next Tuesday at 10:00 a.m. It's still your yard and we will try to minimize the mess! Especially just before a major holiday0 Pamela Quinn, Zoning Specialist (POWYS) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI pamg@co.scrint-cy~oix. wi. us 11/24/2008 Page 1 of 1 Pam Quinn From: Jansky, Leroy G -COMMERCE [Leroy.Jansky@Wisconsin.gov] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:55 AM To: Pam Quinn; 'dan.anderson@fiserv.com' Subject: Onsite for Tuesday, 25 Nov 08 I believe inspection our intent is two-fold on Tuesday. First, we need to verify previous observations by the county, in the presence of the installer, regarding the location of the two dispersal cells. If the determination is that the two cells overlap or that separation distances between cells don't meet code minimums we have a clear violation and a need for correction. The corrective action is to replace the cell(s). However, we won't allow the unless the replacement cells are correctly sized and installed in compliant soils. So this leads us to the second part of the investigation pertaining to soil suitability that appears centered on what the soil application rate should be. I have already stated that I felt Adam Schumaker did not report is finding correctly based on other information I have for this site and the general area. I will make a final determination based on my own observations on Tuesday. This will likely require at least one additional soil pit probably in the vicinity of Adam's B-1. I'm not sure I want to dig into the newer system because it may be real messy and not provide any meaningful information anyway. There is no test we can perform in the system that we can't do nearby the cell. If it is shown that the new cells meet setback standards and that only the soil application rate is in question, I cannot order Adam to do anything. I believe that it would become a civil matter between the owner and Adam and/or the General Contractor. The owner would work through his own attorney in this regards. See you all on Tuesday. Pam: Please contact Adam to inform him of our investigation and that he should be present. I assume Bill will be there. Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist 13 E. Spruce Street, Suite 103 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 leroy.jansky@wisconsin.gov 715.726.2544 office 715.726.2549 fax 715.828.5902 cell 11 /24/2008 Q c ~ ~ i "' c rV 0. I ~ I C O O N R N C +^ s i Z 'o •~ N .~ 4 • O rr`F~ra `1 ~ rn Z ~' Z `' oz~~' '~~~' ~ ~ I 0 Z -o c 3 LL 3 0 a~ Z jjj O O L ,Q) a m C 7 ~ Z Z O ' ' r C d m I m N ~ a I, d - ' d ~ a ~ N I ~ ' N i c o a z °'' v > ' ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ a a a 0. 7 2 N N ~ ~ 0 0 O NO O N .~ d ° O ~ N w N c 0 N 0 N 3 O ~ O Q ~ ~ _O 00 d II N ~ O ~ p O O ~ ~ N O N _ M ~ ~ ~~~ ,£ m ~ xt °' a a T a, y u I, 'c ~ ~ d c V a ~ '', O to V m o O ~ N ~ 0 a I a~ ~ I cn N ~ N o .c Z vi ~ O) C ' ~ O a ~ .O O a d N c I ~ I ~ I ._ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~n O O O ~ ~ ~N O N O ,~ .' o O Z O C •> O Y .f ~ ~ c I d J •> ~ N 0 } ~ ~ O Z ~ ~ °o °o °o N N N ~ C~ ~ ~ .- ~ N ~ ~ N Q ~ A ~ (6 r Q O) :~ p N N c N C ~ > ~ ~- " M 00 ~_ ~_ O O O O ~I N m ~ O ~ ' 'p N N N N N In N 00 ~ C ~ W ~ &Y ~ O ~ O ~ ~ O N O m ~ U N ~ ~ ~ ` ~ commerce.wi.gov isconsin Department of Commerce Safety and Buildings 3824 N CREEKSIDE LA HOLMEN WI 54636 Contact Through Relay www. commerce.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary September 08, 2009 CUST ID No. 227990 WILLIAM C SCHUMAKER SCHUMAI~ER PLUMBING 1070 SCOTT RD HUDSON WI 54016 ATTN.• POII'7'Slnspector ZONING OFFICE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1101 CARMICHAEL RD HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 09/08/2011 SITE: Dan & Shannon Anderson 335 Edgewood Dr Town of Hudson St Croix County SE1/4, NW1/4, S7, T29N, R19W Lot: 91-92-93, Subdivision: Plat of Edgewood Estates Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1703282 Site ID No. 751022 Please refer to both identification numbers, above, in all comes ondence with the a enc . FOR: Description: Four Bedroom Mound System / 17% slope Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1238941 Maintenance required; Replacement system; 600 GPD Flow rate; 32 in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade; System(s): Ezflow Mound Component Manual, (N.6/03), Pressure Distribution Component Manual - Version 2.0, SBD-10706-P (N.O1/O1); Effluent Filter The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with any component manual(s) referenced above. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per s.145.06, stats. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: Reminders • A sanitary permit must be obtained from the county where this project is located in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 145.135 and 145.19, Wis. Stats. P.E ~`~n~ ~P DEPARTME DIVISION OF S~ SEE CORI • Inspection of the private sewage system installation is required. Arrangements for inspection shall be made with the designated county official in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 145.20(2)(d), Wis. Stats. • The area within 15 feet horizontally down slope of the dispersal cell shall remain undisturbed. Vehicular traffic or soil compaction in this area is prohibited. • The existing tanks shall be inspected for compliance to Comm 83, Wis. Adm. Code. If they do not comply they shall be abandoned per Comm 83.33, Wis. Adm. Code. • Maintenance information must be given to the owner of the tank explaining that periodic cleaning of the effl filter is required. Access to the filter for cleaning must be provided per Comm 84 product approv~l~~ conditions. +rT a\V inspection by authorized representatives of the Department which may include local inspectors WII..LIAM C SCHUMAKER Page 2 9/8/2009 , ' y Owner Responsibilities: • The current owner, and each subsequent owner, shall receive a copy of this letter including instructions relating to proper use and maintenance of the system. Owners shall receive a copy of the appropriate operation and maintenance manual and/or owner's manual for the POWTS described in this approval. • The owner of a POWTS shall be responsible for ensuring that the operation and maintenance of the POWTS occurs in accordance with this chapter and the approved management plan under s. Comm 83.54(1). • In the event this soil absorption system or any of its component parts malfunctions so as to create a health hazard, the property owner must follow the contingency plan as described in the approved plans. • The owner is responsible for submitting a maintenance verification report acceptable to the county for maintenance tracking purposes. Reports shall be submitted at intervals appropriate for the component(s) utilized in the POWTS. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS. Sincerely, erard M Swim POWTS Plan Reviewer, Integrated Services (608)789-7892, Mon -Fri, 7:15 am - 4:00 pm j erry. swim@wsconsin. gov Fee Required $ 250.00 Fee Received $ 250.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 WiSMART code: 7633 cc: Leroy G Jansky, POWTS Wastewater Specialist, (715) 726-2544 ,Friday, 7:00 A.M. To 3:30 P.M. Notice: Starting July 1, 2009, no person or entity may~engage or offer to engage in construction business in Wisconsin unless they hold a Building Contractor Registration, or equivalent, issued by the Safety and Buildings Division of the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. "Construction business" means a trade that installs, alters or repairs arty building element, component, material or device that is regulated under the commercial building code, chs. Comm 60 to 66, the uniform dwelling code, chs. Comm 20 to 25, the electrical code, ch. Comm 16, the plumbing code, chs. Comm 81 to 87, or the public swimming pools and water attractions code, ch. Comm 90. The term does not include the delivery of building supplies or materials, or the manufacture of a building product not on the building site. For further information, go to our website: www.commerce.wi.aov/SB/SB-BuildingContractorProeram.html a~~. ~,~ "~ EZFLOW MOUND AND PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT DESIGN Residential Application INDEX AND TITLE PAGE Project Name: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Owner's Name: Dan & Shannon Anderson Owner's Address: 335 Edgewood Drive Hudson, WI 54016 Site Address: Same Legal Description: SE1/4NW1/4, Sec. 7, T.29N., R.19W. Township: Hudson County: St. Croix Subdivision Name: Edgewood Estates Lot Number: ~ 91, 92, 93 Block Number: Na Parcel I.D. Number: 020-1170-80-000 Plan Transaction No.: Page 1 Index and title Page 2 Data entry Page 3 EZFIow mound drawings Page 4 Lateral and dose tank Page 5 Distribution media Page 6 System maintenance specifications Page 7 Management and contingency plan Page 8 Pump curve and specifications Page 9 Attached Soil Evaluaiton Report ! T.S, Qn~~~y ~~ F COMMERCE !AND BUILDINGS 'O~ENCE Designer: Bill Schumaker License Number: 227990 Date: 06/16/09 Phone Number: (715) 386-3121 Signature: ~~~,~ Designed Pursuant to the EZFIow Mound Component Manual (N. 06/03), and SSWMP Publication 9.6 Design of Pressure Distribution Networks for ST-SAS (01/81) EZFIow Mound Version 1.2 (R. 02/04) Page 1 of 9 EZFIow Mound and Pressure Distribution Component Design Design Worksheet Site Inf rm o ation _ _ (r or c) ~___ _~ R ~ Residential or Commercial Design 40 0.00 Estimated Wastewater Flow (gpd) _ _ 1.50 Peaking Factor (e.g. 1.5 = 150%) 600.00 Design Flow (gpd) 17.00 ~ Site Slope (%) ~_____ ! 1 16.90 Installation Contour Line Elevation (ft) __ 32 00 Depth to Limiting Factor (in) _ 0 60 In-situ Soil Application Rate (gpd/ftz) Distribution Cell Information 9.0 ~ Cell Width (ft) 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, or 10 Only ___1.00 Dispersal Cell Design Loading Rate (gpd/ftz) _ _-__~1J Influent Wastewater Quality (1 or 2) Pressure Disribution Information (c ore) ~ ~ Center or End Manifold 3.00 Lateral Spacing (ft) 3 Number of Laterals j _ _ 0.1_25 Orifice Diameter (in) (e.g. 0.25) 2.50 Estimated Orifice Spacing (ft) _ 2.OOi Forcemain Diameter (in) 170.00 Forcemain Length (ft) i_~_91.21~ Inside Pump Tank Elevation (ft) 6.50 System Head (ft) x 1.3 25.69 Vertical Lift (ft) 4.29 Friction Loss (ft) 36.48 Total Dynamic Head (ft) Lateral Diameter Selection in. dia. o tions choice - - 0.75 '-_ ___ _ 1.00 ---- ------- 1.25 X x , -____ _ __ 1.50 . x I 2.00 x _ 4 3.00 ____ x Treatment Tank Information ,2200.00~_Septic Tank Capacity (gal) ~WieserConcrete ;Manufacturer Note: Sand fill (D) calculations assume a Table 83-44-3 in-situ soil treatment for fecal coliform of <= 36 inches. 90.00 Contour Length Available (ft) 70.00 =Dispersal Cel! Length (ft) Are the laterals the highest oint in the distribution ~Y network? Enter Y or N If N above, enter the elevation ft of the highest point. 7.50 ft2/orifice Does the forcemain drain back? [- Y Enter Y or N 27.73 Forcemain Drainback (gal) 65.55 5x Void, Volume (gal) 93.28 Minimum Dose Volume (gal) 34.60 System Demand (gpm) Manifold Diamet~~ Selatti~r in. dia. o tions choice 1.25 x 1.50 x 2.00 x x 3.00 Gallonsllnch Calculator (optional) 800.00 Total Tank Capacity (gal) 38.00 Total Working Liquid Depth (in) 21.05 gal/in (enter result in cell B49) Dose Tank Information Effluent Filter Information _800.00 Dose Tank Capacity (gal) Zabel Filter Manufacturer 21.05 Dose Tank Volume (gal/in) A-100 Filter Model Number .Wieser Concrete, _JManufacturer Project: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Page 2 of 8 Mound Plan View 1- l .................................................. ~•1• ~1/1~0 B~ :~:~:~:~:~:~::~:::::•:':•:•:•:•:•:.:• ............. . Observation Pipe :•:•43J:•:•:• K :j: :r. .r;r;r.r.f;f.r. ;r;f.f;r f:r. '.• 5 . .. ... .r...:.: •::.:. f........ ':{ti ;ti; ;ti; ;r. r; •r r; t• t t r;r r r r r r 5 :S tii1 L :. L L.y.'. LPL '. S S •.. •t~ •I .'. •'. .'.'B• 1. -~ -~+ -I -1 Mound Component Dimensions A 9.00 ft E 24.36 in H 1.00 ft K 9.80 ft B 70.00 ft F 12.00 in z 21.61 ft L 89.59 ft D 6.00 in G 0.50 ft J 3.97 ft W 34.59 ft 630.00 (ftz) Dispersal Cell Area 2142.86 (ft2) Basal Area Available 8.57 (gpd/ft) Linear Loading Rate 7.00 (ft) 1/10 B Obs. Pipe Placement Mound Cross Section View Aggregate Dispersal Area Finished Grade 119.40 (ft) F '''''~ 117.40 (ft)-- - '~'':~6" Dispersal Cell [~~: Elevation -I H Dispersal Cell 117.90 (ft) Lateral Invert Elevation :: •D :~:::;::; .... . ~~;:'~ 116.90 (ft) Contour Elevation 17.0 % Site Slope Typical Dispersal Cell Shading Key ~ a. See Page 5 Q Topsoil Cap o ~ Geotextile Fabric over ......., ~ 0 2.0 ft Q Subsoil Cap ~, .y.. ASTM C33 Sand ~ ~ fL:`1fyr~'f. f.F{f f{f,, :, f1f{f:.fti .,.,::..~.~, ~ .;v L.L. {.ti.L f,fyf,{;yf4 rLjti L I Tilled Layer ~ u, ~rtitifr ~:~:;•:~.,.L. :: L.L~ ti:• © ~ ~ 015 ft •f{.L.Lfy%• •':4r{:{f;rdf ftir{r{:ti:{f EZFIow Media ~ o ~_ •f•f•f• •f•f:r•r f•f•r~•f ,j ~rA- T See details on page 4 for number, size, and spacing of laterals. Laterals are located in the 4" gravity distribution pipes as shown on page 5. Project: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Page 3 of 8 End Connection Lateral Layout Diagram • = Turn-up wut bsl l vslvo or of ~~n out pl u p P - Z -~l 1st orilicc kfCaded ad Z !F X --~! A!1 Ieaerds idcra:cal, atA eHthces equaly spaces ('JfCC (naln (OnnMilOn 1~bd iCt Or CIUSS t0 m8nibld BQ Lf/~/ point. Laeeeali 8c iora main bi P'YiC $eti 40 ~ (o« corm TabN e~.30.5) s Orifices poirR up exceprt every 5th one goiMs down for draina~e_ Number of Laterals Lateral Diameter Lateral Length (P) Lateral End (Z) Lateral Spacing (S) Lateral Flow Rate System Flow Rate 3 1.25 in 69.29 ft 0.71 ft 3.00 ft 11.53 gpm 34.60 gpm Orifice Diameter Orifice Spacing (X) Orifices per Lateral Orifice Density Manifold Length Manifold Diameter Forcemain Velocity 0.125 in 2.54 ft 28 7.50 ftz/orifice 6.00 ft 2.00 in 3.53 ft/sec Dose Tank Information Electrical as per NEC 300 and -• Comm 16.28 WAC Disconnect Tank component is properly vented Wieser Concrete Ca acit 800.00 Volume 21.05 Manufacturer Gallons gal/inch Dimension Inches Gallons A 19.57 412.02 B 2.00 42.10 C D Total 4.43 12.00 ~ ~ 38.00 93.28 252.60 800.00 n _~ A B C D ng under tank. Alarm Manufacturer LevelArm Alarm Model Number 101 DLV Pump Manufacturer Goulds J Pump Model Number WE07H __ Pump Must Deliver 34.60 gpm at 36.48 ft TDH Locking cover with warning label and locking device, and sealed watertight 4 in. min. z_ F- Alternate outlet location Forcemain diameter ~ 2 in. Weep hole or anti- siphon device Pump off elevation (ft) 92.21 Dose tank elevation (ft) 91.21 Project: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Page 4 of 8 EZFIow Distribution Cell Media Layout 9.00 Cell Width (ft) 1.50 Sidewall to Lateral (ft) Distribution Cell Cross-section Arrangements Drag appropriate drawing to space below. 9 ft Wide ~ Component Leaend ® 6" EZFIow Bundle - EZ0601A, 5 or 10 Foot Lengths 12" EZFIow Bundle - EZ1203H, 5 or 10 Foot Lengths 12" EZFIow Bundle - EZ1203HP 5 or 10 Ft Len ths , g ~ 4" Distribution Pipe With Pressure Lateral Inside ~ Turnup Enclosure - - - - Lateral Distribution Cell Plan View Layout -Typical 9.00 Cell Width - A (ft) ~ 70.00 Cell Length - B (ft) -force Main Project: Dan & Shannon Anderson 4-bedroom residnetial mound Page 5 of 8 Mound System Management Plan Pursuant to Comm 83.54, Wis. Adm. Code General This system shall be operated in accordance with Comm 82-84 Wis. Adm. Code, and shall maintained in accordance with its' component manuals [SBD-10691-P (N.01/01), SSWMP Publication 9.6 (01/81), and Pressure Distribution Component Manual Ver. 2.0 SBD-10706-P (N. 01/01)] and local or state rules pertaining to system maintenance and maintenance reporting. No one should ever enter a septic or pump tank since dangerous gases may be present that could cause death. Septic and pump tank abandonment shall be in accordance with Comm 83.33, Wis. Adm. Code when the tanks are no longer used as POWTS components. Septic or pump tank manhole risers, access risers and covers should be inspected for water tightness and soundness. Access openings used for service and assessment shall be sealed watertight upon the completion of service. Any opening deemed unsound, defective, or subject to failure must be replaced. Exposed access openings greater than 8-inches in diameter shall be secured by an effective locking device to prevent accidental or unauthorized entry into a tank or component. Septic Tank The septic tank shall be maintained by an individual certified to service septic tanks under s. 281.48, Stats. The content; of the septic tank shall be disposed of in accordance with NR 113, Wis. Adm. Code. The operating condition of the septic tank and outlet filter shall be assessed at least once every 3 years by inspection. The outlet filter shall be cleaned as necessary to ensure proper operation. The filter cartridge should not be removed unless provisions Gle I11GUC tV I GtGln ;Olio; in t .e tank that .nay slough off the filter when removed from its enclosure. If the filter is equipped with an alarm, the filter shall be serviced if the alarm is activated continuously. Intermittent filter alarms may indicate surge flows or an impending continuous alarm. The septic tank shall have its contents removed when the volume of sludge and scum in the tank exceeds 1/3 the liquid volume of the tank. If the contents of the tank are not removed at the time of a triennial assas;nl~erlt, mainltenlar~;,e Ner;cn~n~~l sf~sl~ ad~i;~ t;~e ~wrler of when the next service needs to be performed to maintain less than maximum scum and sludge accumulation in the tank. The addition of biological or chemical additives to enhance septic tank performance is generally not required. However, if such products are used they shall be approved for septic tank use by the Department of Commerce. Pump Tank The pump (dosing) tank shall be inspected at least once every 3 years. All switches, alarms, and pumps shall be tested to verify proper operation. If an effluent filter is installed within the tank it shall be inspected and serviced as necessary. Mound and Pressure Distribution Svstem No trees or shrubs should be planted on the mound. Plantings may be made around the mound's perimeter, and the mound shall be seeded and mulched as necessary.to prevent erosion and to provide some protection from frost penetration. Traffic (other than for vegetative maintenance) on the mound is not recommended since soil compaction may hinder aeration of the infiltrative surface within the mound and snow compaction in the winter will promote frost penetration. Cold weather installations (October-February) dictate that the mound be heavily mulched as protection from freezing. Influent quality into the mound system may not exceed 220 mg/L BODS, 150 mg/L TSS, and 30 mg/L FOG for septic tank effluent or 30 mg/L BODS, 30 mg/L TSS, 10 mg/L FOG, and 10" cfu/100 mL for highly treated effluent. Influent flow may not exceed maximum design flow specified in the permit for this installation. The pressure distribution system is provided with a flushing point at the end of each lateral, and it is recommended that each lateral be flushed of accumulated solids at least once every 18 months. When a pressure test is performed it should be compared to the initial test when the system was installed to determine if orifice clogging has occurred and if orifice cleaning is required to maintain equal distribution within the dispersal cell. Ob;evation pipes Within the dispersal cell shall be checked for effluent ponding. Ponding levels shall be reported to the owner, and any levels above 6 inches considered as an impending hydraulic failure requiring additional, more frequent monitoring. Continoencv Plan If the septic tank or any of its components become defective the tank or component shall be repaired or replaced to keep the system in proper operating condition. If the dosing tank, pump, pump controls, alarm or related wiring becomes defective the defective component(s) shall be immediately repaired or replaced with a component of the same or equal performance. r~.,_„ f :`;c ;-~c::^-' cc^,^^^^^t fails to accept ~:~astewater or begins to discharge wastewater to the ground surface, it will be repaired or replaced in its' present location by increasing basal area if toe leakage occurs or by removing biologically clogged absorption and dispersal media, and related piping, and replacing said components as deemed necessary to bring the system into proper operating condition. See Page 5 of this plan for the name and telephone number of your local POWTS regulator and service provider. Pretreatment Units The information and schedule of mananagement and maintenance for pretreatment devices such as aerobic treatment units or disinfection units are attached as separate documents and are considered part of the overall management plan for this system. Project: Page 6 of 9 ~ s d ~" ;?' ~br Features and Benefits •All models feature silicon carbide "~echan~ca! sea! faces for superior aur~srve resisr;nce ;Ind extra '~nnq I~fe • ~;~~ .:'on ri~~ u~~'_. non-clog ~nfr211~r~~.~,i~n p~:~>>~:-autwanes for mect~anica~ seas i,~rotection. • Rugged cast.ro~~ ~~~ol~.;?e type casing adaptable for slide r~ui systems. • Corrosion res~~stan! ti~readed ~~a nl~ss stee ;I~,:,f. . ~,,~~~ ,~ ;;' '. ~ s_:,~ i-;rged ~n high ~;~,la~~t~~ oi~~ for ,,;I:~,~~~; ~~a~on anJ P.fiiGiP,nt hP:B( il~,nsfP.r •'::~a!~onal s~iico~~~ L!n+~~e impeller ;`!aii'~!)e • SSA I~:sted nlodeis available- Pump Specifications '!z H P Up to 75 GPM Maximum head to 18' Discharge size 2" NPT Solids: 2" maximum Motor All motors feature ball bearing construction. Single phase: 115V Materials of Construction Cast iron Thermoplastic Stainless steel Features and Benefits • Glass filled. thermoplastic ; c~n~ impeller with stainless Stee~~ insert and pump out vanes f:~r mechanical seal protect~o~~ • Rugged glass-fiilied the. mop:~,Si~' casing and base desig ,,, e=_~ superior strength a~~~d cnr~~s ~~~~ resistance. • Cast iron motor housinc '~;~ efficient heat transfer. s~reng~" and dLlrabl~lty. • Corrosion resistant trre~l~u~~d StaInBSS StBe Sha??. • Available in automatic anc ,,~..,,. ~~~odels • CSA listed mo~leis a~%a!ia!:~'~ ~r Untlenvrilers Laboratories ~! ^.1 ode-s are designed for continuous operation and feature stainless steel hardware. \_ \ ~``. 1 i ._ ~ ...____~ xo _.___._ __`___._~ ,~ - -___ _ t--,. --- ~ ~~~~ V •~ S' c o a ~ ~ ~ ~. ~,. ~~~~~~ h ~~ 3 ~p~~ Q~n~ V~~ - ~~ /7~ 6/0~ ~1~ S`N~ ~ ~ ~ ~Y _ ~kr ~ ys f`'" ~,'rv-"' - - ~ ` "~' P~opos cam! /r(o u,,~d at 3~1,.~7x ~? s9 ~cY -. __ _-- ' ,9 C~X 70. c0 ds~i'sc/ CeJ/. 7~ r t c (~ _ ~ d,s~, bu.t4'Q., /afc~t,/s a~ 1~ X G 9, z9' - - - - - - - - - - - - `~ ,`. ~Yy/'p,^Tf%Cts yoaccd av`,L SSA' ---- •~ c~.~~ ~ ~ cc, ' . //G .O, ,~ _ " lfO~irbl.Ecd CBs' ~is~s ~. ~~y~~~ ~ ~,'ve - _~~ 9.3 ~~~e: ~i7,S~e o/~rao/2 a ~ ends aF -/7o'oF1",Sc,(.s~0/?t!C.+~vrY~¢.r-tai,t. •CoL92 pu,.n/~pdiv~tScv~tC.ecckt~~.-' a%'s~'.sa/ce/% tv be ctGa~ ara w- d a., d a ,..gay ~'r-o.r~ Sys~a+n ~ ~ ~ l.~;eur Panu' EXisfih~j ~ co.~-6,%ra~i ,o l 2~/BCC ti, Sr~ ~ ' '' ~ ~/ ajG:i'tl~ ~~/A-/!O +~ /4`n~~ /6•~a-ES.Tou~/~c.~. o e~, ~: Ta~°OFo/ -kPfi~e-'~9-+~Lltanocc~/% scum ~l¢.u.- s /do.~' Lot 9Z L..c~ 9/ C~,'s-{si~l ~~ Ld,ASL`~~^f~F~,~~iS~+~t= (/ /o,NCr .n~ y~~~ Exs~~~~J bid `/ berli'6arr~ o res~ da.~ce. ----1 g asp~~ ; ~n/C ~4ra4Q, ( JJ I o O ` ~ I 1 \ t ~ /32.98 P~.~o-F 9 commerce.wi.gov iscansin Department of Commerce August 10, 2009 William Schumaker, MP 227990 1070 Scott Rd Hudson, W 154016 Dear Mr. Schumaker: SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Chippewa Fa11s, Wisconsin 54729 (715) 726-2544 http.//www.commerce. wi.gov/sb httpJit+vww.wiscbnsin.gov TTY.' Contact Through Relay Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary Re: Dan Anderson POWTS Inspection Sanitary Permit No.: 430503 Lots 91-92 Edgewood Estates I I I SE, NW, 7, 29, 19W Town of Hudson, St. Croix County First off, I hope you are feeling better. I don't mean to stress you out but we have some unfinished business to deal with and our installation window is shrinking. On July 23, 2009, I telephoned you regarding the status of the plan approval and system installation for the above project. You told me that the plans had been completed by Jim Thompson and were on your desk ready to be sent in to the state for review. As of August 10, 2009, no plans have been received for review. Please submit these plans immediately so that this project can go forward. This system needs to be installed before inclement weather limits or prohibits the installation. The owner would also like to get the mound area landscaped and vegetated well before freezing conditions occur. Please get back to me as soon as possible on the status of this matter. Sincerely, Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist (715) 726-2544 Office (715) 726-2549 Fax leroy.jansky@wisconsin.gov e-cc: St. Croix County Zoning Owner commerce.wi.gov ^ ^ i sco n s i n Department of Commerce SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Ste 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 P www.commerce.wi.gov~sb RECEivEO Richard J. Leinenkugel) Secret ry Date of Inspection: May 27, 2009 SUN O5 ZOOg'lumber Name and Address: Project Name: Anderson (formerly Ashley) William Schumaker, MP227990 Use: Residential gY crtotxcouN'sY~cE 1070 Scott Rd Legal Description: SE, NW, 7, 29, 19WpI,p~NNING~`Z~I~ Hudson, WI 54016 Site Number: na Subdivision: Lots 91-92, Edgewood Estates III Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Hudson Adam Schumaker CST 253309 County: St. Croix 2113 80th Street Somerset, WI 54025 Plan Transaction Number: na Sanitary Permit Number: 430503, 83788 and Owner Name and Address: 75020 Dan Anderson Wastewater Flow: 600 gpd 335 Edgewood Dr Persons Present: P. Quinn, D. Anders on, W. Hudson, WI 54016 Schumaker This investigation was conducted at the request of the installer, William Schumaker, to make a final determination as to the location of the eastern edge of the soil absorption system installed in 1986 and the western edge of a newer system installed in 2003. Both systems were installed by Mr. Schumaker. A soil excavation was made in the approximate area of one dug by Tom Schmitt on August 5, 2008. Schmitt had located the piping in the 1986 installation and determined that the newer system was closer than three feet (minimum code setback) to the original system. My determination today is based on lateral measurements from the south east corner of the house to the western edge of the 2003 system and to the eastern edge'of the 1986 system. These measurements show that the western edge of the 2003 system is 51 feet from the home and the eastern edge of the 1986 system is at least 50.67 feet from the home. The two systems nearly overlap at this point and are not orientated parallel to each other but at a slight angle (2 degrees). This means that they are even closer together north of the point investigated. Therefore, the 2003 installation does not have the required three (3) foot separation from the adjacent system and violates the specifications set forth in the design manual used in its design by Schumaker. In addition, it is very likely that the newer system is partially installed in disturbed (fill) soil and not in situ (Natural) soil as required by the design manual. Violations of the design manual are considered a violation of Comm 83 and are subject to an enforcement action such as the one issued on October 24, 2008. To verify the recent soil report by Tom Schmitt, one soil pit was constructed west of the newer system at the edge of the wooded part of the parcel (approximately 70 feet NNE of Schmitt's B-2) to determine if substratum soil conditions reported were indeed massive. It is my opinion that at 36 inches depth begins a strong brown, massive, firm, sandy loam textured glacial till material. For a below grade system in a massive sandy loam, Comm Table 83.44-1 sets the maximum soil application rate at 0.20 gpd/ftz and minimum aggregate absorption area of 3,000 ft2 fora 4-bedroom home. Although this material appears well-drained (no redoximorphic features are present), many designers avoid installing very large subsurtace systems and choose a mound system using the minimum sand lift -six inches. This is certainly an option, and my recommendation, for this site especially .since a dose tank is already installed. The area has been tested by Schmitt and plans for a mound system could be submitted in short order. In summary, this investigation does not change the conditions of the order issued by me on October 24, 2008. The deadline for corrections is well past and it would be best for all concerned to replace the present system as soon as possible. Any penalties will be assessed beginning based on the November 25, 2008 compliance date specified in the October order. I will be monitoring progress toward plan approval, permit issuance and Page 2 of 2 May 27, 2009 Anderson Residence installation to help ensure corrections are made to bring this installation into compliance with Comm 83. Lastly, the owner and installer/designer must agree on the number of bedrooms in this home. The original permit was for 4-bedrooms but more recent reports indicate a 3-bedroom home. If there are any questions regarding this report please contact me. Leroy G. Ja ky, ast~ 4 ter Spe~~~ list lero .~ansk Wisconsin. ov E-ri~fail 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax cc: County Plumber ^ CST ~[ Owner ^ Other Approximate Location/Relationship of Soil Absorption (Dispersal) Cells 2003 cells 118.75' & 125' N 1986 cell 18' x 60' ,. ,~ .: /~,.-- ,, House No Scale commerce.wi.gov isconsin Department of Commerce SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729 (715) 726-2544 http://www. commerce. wi.gov/sb htlpl/wwwwisconsin.gov TTY: Contact Through Relay Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary April 17, 2009 William Schumaker, MP 227990 1070 Scott Rd Hudson, WI 54016 Dear Mr. Schumaker: Re: Dan Anderson POWTS Inspection Lots 91-92 Edgewood Estates I I I SE, NW, 7, 29, 19W Town of Hudson, St. Croix County Sanitary Permit No.: 430503 1 have scheduled myself to be working in the Hudson area on Tuesday, April 28, 2009. This would be an opportune time to conduct an inspection at the Anderson property to determine to location of the new and old soil absorption cells. If you cannot make arrangements to have utilities marked and a backhoe present on the 28th I will assume that you are not interested in taking a look at the location of the systems. Normal procedure would be for me to continue on with our enforcement action in this matter based on the information and witnesses and documentation we have available to date. Please get back to me as soon as possible to verify the above inspection date. Sincerely, Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist (715) 726-2544 Office (715) 726-2549 Fax leroy.jansky@wisconsin.gov e-cc: St. Croix County Zoning Owner commerce.wi.gov i ^ ~scons~n Department of Commerce SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729 (715) 726-2544 http://www.commerce. wi.gov/sb httpl/wwty. wisconsin.gov TTY: Contact Through Relay Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Secretary March 31, 2009 William Schumaker, MP 227990 1070 Scott Rd Hudson, WI 54016 Dear Mr. Schumaker: Re: Dan Anderson POWTS Inspection Sanitary Permit No.: 430503 Lots 91-92 Edgewood Estates I I I SE, NW, 7, 29, 19W Town of Hudson, St. Croix County We still need to schedule an inspection at the Anderson residence to determine to location of the new and old soil absorption cells. I believe that in most cases the soil is no longer frozen so we should get on with the inspection as long as town road weight limits don't hinder our efforts. At this time I have the following dates in April open for the inspections: 7, 14, 20, 27-30. A time later in the morning or in the early afternoon would work best for me. Please get back to me as soon as possible to schedule this investigation. Sincerely, Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist (715) 726-2544 Office (715) 726-2549 Fax leroy.jansky@wisconsin.gov e-cc: St. Croix County Zoning Owner RODLI, BESKAR, BOLES, KRUEGER & PLETCHER, S.C. A Service Corporation Attorneys at Law November 3, 2008 LEROY G. JANSKY WASTE WATER SPECIALIST STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPT. OF COMMERCE SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION 13 EAST SPRUCE STREET, SUITE 106 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI 54729 IN RE: Sanitary Permit No. 830503, 83788 and 75022 Project Name: Anderson (formerly Ashley) Lots 91 and 92 Edgewood Estates Third Town of Hudson Dear Mr. Jansky: Keith Rodli j- Leo A. Beskar Joseph D. Boles Stuart J. Krueger t* Gwen Kuchevar Catherine R. Munkittrick Kenneth C. Pletcher *Also licensed in Minnesota f Board Certified Trial Specialist by the National Board of Trial Advocacy E-mail Address: stuna,rodlibeskar.com Web Site: www.rodlibeskar.com I represent William Schumaker. He has provided me with a copy of your September 11, 2008 report, and has asked me to respond to it. Mr. Schumaker disagrees with your conclusions. The excavator who did the digging for the replacement system is Dennis Bjornstad. Mr. Bjornstad was recently out to the site and viewed it. He stretched a string between the vent pipes on the cell which is closest to the original drainage system. He measured from that string to boring number B 1 done by Tom Schmitt. That distance was seven feet. We understand that when the boring was done, the boring actually struck pipe, as well as uncovering rock from the original system. The design of that system indicated that the pipe would have been within 18 inches of the easterly edge of the original system. Depending on the width of the boring, the pipe and all of the rock would have laid in excess of five feet from the closest portion of the cell on the replacement system. That is within code. When the replacement system was installed in 2003, inspections were done by the County, through Kevin Grabow. Mr. Grabow would have looked at the soils that the system was being installed in. He approved the system as designed and as installed. A review of the borings that were done for the original system, as well as the borings for the replacement system show that the two of those are fully consistent. The methods used in 1986 are somewhat different than the current ones, but the results show those tests to be fully consistent. They also show that the system designed and installed in 2003 was consistent with those borings. When you couple that with the approval by the County, it is difficult to understand how you can reach your conclusions that the replacement system was not legally installed. The existence of borings, which appear to be 45-50 feet away from the replacement system really do not tell us anything about the nature of the soils. Nor does boring number B2 done by Mr. Schmitt. When the borings were RECEIVED NOV 0 3 2008 ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING OFFICE 219 North Main Street, Post Office Box 138, River Falls, Wisconsin 54022-0138 Telephone (715) 425-7281 ^ Facsimile (715) 425-7586 ^ Toll Free (800) 728-0626 Leroy G. Jansky November 3, 2008 Page Two done for this replacement system and the digging was done to actually install it, everything that Mr. Schumaker found was consistent with the borings. Presumably the County Inspector also found things to be consistent, or the system would not have. been approved. Mr. Schumaker is convinced that the replacement system is not installed over any portion of the old system. Mr. Bjornstad has offered to come out with a small back hoe in order to verify that, but the homeowner has refused to allow that. That would also allow conducting a boring close to the replacement site to demonstrate that the soils were proper. In terms of the responsibility of Mr. Schumaker, he has no way of knowing below the depth to which the system was installed, what the soils are. He has a right to rely on the soil tests. The same would be true both on the original system and the subsequent one. There is nothing in the soil borings on either which should or could have alerted him to unsatisfactory soils below the level at which he was working. Mr. Schumaker does not know why this system failed early. The manufacturer of the infiltraters has suggested the possibility of silt having washed down from the nearby hillside, having infiltrated the system. That certainly is a possibility. That company was willing to provide new infiltrators, and Mr. Schumaker and Mr. Bjornstad were going to furnish the labor necessary to install those infiltrators and, if necessary, remove any biomat that may have existed. Since these soils would have been slow to absorb, in all likelihood that biomat would be very shallow and would allow proper installation of the new infiltrators in the current position. The homeowner refused to allow this when he was told that the infiltrator company would probably not agree to provide infiltrators for an additional trench, hence the contact with the County and you. Mr. Schumaker wants to resolve this. However, he wants to do it consistent with what his true responsibility is. He believes he properly installed this system to begin with. As already mentioned, he and Mr. Bjornstad would be happy to work with you to do some borings close in proximity to the replacement site to demonstrate the fact that this system was properly installed. Sincerely yours, Stuart J. Krueger c: St. Croix County Zoning Office {Pamela Quinn} c: William Schumaker SJK:mI commerce.wi.gov i ^ ~scons~n Department of Comrnerce November 3, 2008 William Schumaker, MP 227990 1070 Scott Rd Hudson, WI 54016 Dear: Mr. Schumaker: ~4^ ~ T3 ~,a .~~ ;y it -~, G Re: Dan Anderson - POWTS ~_ ~ ~~' "~`~' ~' '49~~i'ifary 335 Edgewood Dr., Hudson, WI Lots 91-92 Edgewood Estates III SE, NW, 7, 29, 19W Town of Hudson, St. Croix County it: 430503 ZINGS DIVISION Services Bureau ist Spruce Street Nisconsin 54729 (715) 726-2544 merce. wi. gov/sb Kyle, Governor I. A, Secretary I received a telephone call today from your attorney regarding the above referenced site and your desire to see for yourself where the two onsite systems are located in reference to each other. I have contacted the owner, Dan Anderson, and he has agreed that you may construct an excavation to do such a verification. His only stipulation is that the county inspector, Pam Quinn, and f be present when the work is done. Therefore, you will need to contact both me and the county inspector to make advance arrangements for our presence at the site. The owner should incur no expense for this work and it is your responsibility to contact Diggers Hotline to get all utilities marked prior to any excavation taking place. If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me as soon as possible. Sincerely, ~0'' ; Leroy . Jansky, RPSS POWTS Wastewater Specialist (715) 726-2544 Office (715) 726-2549 Fax Leroy. jansky@wisconsin.gov cc: Pam Quinn, St. Croix County Zoning Dept. Dan Anderson, Owner commerce.wi.gov ^ ~scons~n Department of Commerce October 24, 2008 COST ID No.: 227990 ~ TRANSACTION No.: na William Schumaker (Installer) 1070 Scott Rd Hudson, WI 54016 SE %4, NW %<, Section 7, T29N, R19W Lots 91-92, Edgewood Estates I I I Sanitary Permit Number 430503 (issued 11/04/2003) PIN 020-1170-80-000 Regulated Objects: na Site Contact: na Contact Phone: na Contact Fax: na Contact E-mail: na RECEIVED OCT `~ i 2008 ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING OFFICE INVESTIGATION NOTES FOR SEPEMBER 11, 2008: St. Croix County has issued two sanitary permits for the conventional below grade systems to serve this home. One was issued in 1986 for a new system and in 2003 a permit was issued for a replacement system. According to the owner, the system began surface discharging at the end of the cell closest to the home when the pump dosed wastewater to the dispersal cell. Both cells were reported to be severely ponded with effluent. The surface discharge of partially treated domestic wastewater has periodically created a human health hazard as defined in s. 254.01(2), Wis. Stats. In my opinion, the reasons for the premature failure of the system are two fold. The first reason is that the newer dispersal cell is installed in fill and partially over an older cell installed in 1986. The horizontal separation between distribution cells as specified in the component design manual for this type of system is three feet. At this site the systems overlap by 2-3 feet. A county inspector has provided a witness statement as to the conditions she observed and those observations confirm my conclusion that the two systems overlap each other. When compared in fact, the plumber's own records of the two installations show the overlap exactly as observed by the county inspector. The infiltrative characteristics of fill material are often unpredictable and therefore questionable and such conditions are not allowed below a standard conventional below grade system. The second reason for premature failure is that the certified soil tester failed to recognize massive sandy loam glacial till as a limitation to infiltration and thus assigned an incorrect soil application rate that was later used to design the dispersal cell. A recent soil evaluation by another certified soil tester indicates that the soil morphology and estimated soil application rate reported by Adam Schumaker (CST 253309} is incorrect. In support of this conclusion, the detailed soil survey for this area shows the soil series for this area to consist largely of massive sandy loam at the depth the system was installed. Massive soil conditions are typically more slowly permeable and require much larger systems to work correctly. In this case, the area of the system would need to be 250% larger to meet code minimum standards. Under normal use the soil dispersal cells were overloaded with wastewater because they were too small and stayed moist to wet almost constantly promoting intense biomat development early on in the system's life cycle. This resulted in hydraulic failure of the cells. This DEPARTMENT ORDER is issued as a result of an inspection on the above referenced site. Violations Revealed: NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS AND ORDERS Safety and Buildings Division 13 E. Spruce St., Ste. 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 www. commerce.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Richard J. Leinenkugel, Sectretary Site ID No.: na SITE ADDRESS: Dan Anderson (owner) 335 Edgewood Dr Hudson, WI 540165 Dunn County, Town of Hudson Domestic wastewater is occasionally discharged to the ground surface. Comm 83.32 (1)(f), Wis. Adm. Code prohibits the final discharge of domestic wastewater or effluent to. the ground surface. The owner is currently maintaining the septic/dose tanks as a holding tank with off site disposal at considerable October 24, 2008 Schumaker Department Order Page 2 of 2 expense in order to abate a human health hazard. 2. At least one dispersal cell constructed in 2003 is not installed over in-situ (natural) soil as required by Section IV, Subsection A, Conventional Soii Absorption Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems SBD-10567-P (R.6/99). Designs and/or installation not in compliance with an approved component manual are considered in violation of s. Comm 83.61, Wis. Adm. Code. 3. The western most dispersal cell installed in 2003 is not at least three feet from an adjacent cell as required by Table 3 in the Conventional Soil Absorption Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems SBD-10567-P (R.6/99). Designs and/or installation not in compliance with an approved component manual are considered in violation of s. Comm 83.61, Wis. Adm. Code. 4. Based on documentation by certified soil tester Thomas J. Schmitt, CST 227429, and the St. Croix County detailed soil survey, there is sufficient evidence that the dispersal cells designed and installed in 2003 were not large enough to operate correctly under the normal flows from a 3-bedroom home. The dispersal area was designed at a 0.50 gpd/ftZ soil application rate but should have been designed at a 0.20 gpolft2 rate. This discrepancy would have increase the dispersal cell size by 250%. This is a violation of s. Comm 83.44(4)(a)1.c. and (c), Wis. Adm. Code, and Table 2 (Minimum area of distribution cell) Conventional Soil Absorption Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems SBD- Corrective Actions Required: The owner shall continue to service the tanks at a frequency to prevent the surface discharge of domestic wastewater. 2. The plumber responsible for the design and installation of the system permittedJunder State Sanitary Permit Number 430503, William Schumaker, MP 227990, shall obtain county and/or department approval and a state sanitary permit to install a system that meets code standards. A code compliant private onsite wastewater treatment system shall be installed as weather conditions permit by the compliance date referenced below. You are hereby ordered. to have the installation corrected at your own expense to conform to the indicated provisions of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and/or Wisconsin Statutes. These corrections shat! be done by a properly licensed plumber, as required under s. 145.06(1) & (2), Stats. This installation shall be corrected by the compliance date noted below, and upon correction of violations I must be notified. If you fail to comply, this order is enforceable in circuit court pursuar`it to s, 145.02(3)(f), Slats., with forfeitures ranging from $10 to $1000 per day for each violation, pursuant to s. 145.12(4), Stats., and you may also be subject to a license action under s. 145.10(1), Stats. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at the number ore-mail fisted below. CONSULTANT NAME: Lero G. Jansk INVESTIGATION DATE: Se tember 11, 2008 PHONE: 715-726-2544 ACTUAL TIME: na MILEAGE: na E-MAIL: lero .'ansk Wisconsin. ov INVESTIGATION TYPE: Construction SIGNATURE: DATE: 10/24/08 INVESTIGATION SOURCE: Count Zonin ~( LEFT COPY ON SITE: Yes ^ No XX , ~ Q- COMPLIANCE DATE: November 25, 2008 Fee Re uired: New Ian and ermit fees as ma a I Attachment: September 11, 2008 Inspection Report by Leroy Jansky cc: Kevin Grabau, St. Croix County Zoning Administrator 1 7 ` commerce.wi.gov isconsin Department of Commerce INSPECTION REPORT Date of Inspection: September 11, 2008 Project Name: Anderson (formerly Ashley) Use: Residential Legal Description: SE, NW, 7, 29, 19W~ Site Number: na Subdivision: Lots 91-92, Edgewood Estates III Municipality: Town of Hudson County: St. Croix Plan Transaction Number: na Sanitary Permit Number: 430503, 83788 and 75020 Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Persons Present: P. Quinn, D. Anderson SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Ste 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 www. co m m e rce. wi . g ov/s b (715) 726-2544' Jack L. Fisher, A.I.A., Secretary Plumber Name and Address: William Schumaker, MP227990 1070 Scott Rd Hudson, WI 54016 Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Adam Schumaker CST 253309 2113 80th Street Somerset, WI 54025 Owner Name and Address: Dan Anderson 335 Edgewood Dr Hudson, WI 54016 This investigation was conducted at the request of the county agent and owner because of the relatively short life (four years) of the onsite system. This home's initial system was installed in 1986 after an investigation by me revealed that the system would be installed much deeper than originally permitted. Anew soil and percolation test was completed for the deeper system and the system installed accordingly. In 2003 a second system was installed to replace the initial one and now this system is not adequately accepting wastewater so the owner is servicing the tanks as needed to prevent a surface discharge. No surface discharge was noted during this investigation. We opened the manhole covers on the newer. septic and dose tank for inspection .and it did not appear that the riser ring joints were allowing water to infiltrate the tanks. This is a common location for leaks to occur. However, a visual observation is not a definitive test since the tank could leak from just about anywhere. A water tightness test could be performed if thought necessary to prove that the tanks are watertight. The present dispersal system has failed hydraulically according to the owner since when the pump doses the dispersal cell effluent discharges .from the end of the west cell (there are two cells) to the ground surface. Because a buried topsoil horizon was reported by the installer in 2003 and the assumed location of the initial system it had been assumed that the present system was actually installed in fill and partially over the initial system. The soil and site report by Thomas Schmitt, CST 227429, indicates that a portion of the initial system (1986) is below its replacement (2003). This can be confirmed in an approximate manner in that the initial system was reported to be 26 feet from the home and is 18 feet wide and therefore its eastern edge is about 44 feet from the corner of the home. The replacement system was reported to be 42 feet from the building. In addition, Schmitt's report states that at B-1 he uncovered part of the initial system at a boring depth of 81 inches. If this depth corresponds roughly to the top of the distribution pipe in the initial system, the elevation of that pipe would be 90.55 feet and this corresponds nicely with the top of pipe elevation by a county inspector of 90.56 feet. This is based on the original BM of 100.0 feet on top of the lot corner stake and then calculating the elevation of the top of the original septic tank inspection riser pipe based on the original septic tank outlet pipe elevation and the 2003 septic tank outlet elevation. The top of the inspection pipe is at 95.70 feet as referenced to the original BM. The location of the initial system indicates that at least the west replacement cell is installed in fill. This was not appropriate in 2003 and is still not acceptable to install a system in fill without department approval. This is a violation of the conventional system component manual specifications in Table 2 that states that soil application September 11, 2008 Anderson Residence Page 2 of 2 rates used are for "in situ" (natural -undisturbed) soil. In addition, any fill material would have been required to meet standard ASTM C33 (washed sand) pursuant to Comm 84.30(6)Q), Wis. Adm. Code. The most recent soil and site evaluation by Schmitt clearly shows that a massive sandy loam glacial till substratum exists at about 3.5 feet. This observation is also what the detailed soil survey reports the substratum material to be in the general area. Soils mapped at this location are the Amery soil series.. Other nearby soil series includes the Jewett and Santiago series. They both have massive sandy loam substratum material as reported by the soil survey and similar to the Amery series. It is unlikely that the present system is installed in anything but a massive sandy loam soil condition. The presence of massive sandy loam glacial till at the depth of the system installation complicates matters further in that the soil application rate for such material is 0.2 gpd/ftZ. This is much lower than the 0.5 gpd/ftZ rate specified by the certified soil tester and used by the plumber to design the system. In contrast, an aggregate dispersal cell fora 3-bedroom home using a 0.20 gpd/ftZ soil application rate would be 2,250 ftZ in area and at a 0.5 loading it is only 900 ftZ. In order to code compliant and operate correctly the system would have to be 250% larger than as installed. Based on the data and reports that I have reviewed it is certain that one of the replacement dispersal cells is installed partially in fill material and that all cells are vastly undersized in their ability to accept wastewater. In my opinion, these two conditions have lead to the premature hydraulic failure of the replacement system. The recommendation by Schmitt is to install a mound system in a new area using a minimum amount sand fill lift of 6 inches. This is the minimum sand lift allowed by the mound component manual. However, sometimes a thicker sand lift is better for treatment and dispersal but adds to cost. Overall, an above grade system -will perform better since it will discharge effluent to soil that can readily accept and disperse it into the environment. The majority of the problems leading to this system failure can be largely attributed to inadequate work by the certified soil tester, Adam Schumaker. He did not take into account the location of the existing system and incorrectly described soil conditions that resulted in under sizing the dispersal cells and early failure. However, the designer and installer should have also realized, based on existing documentation and his own past experience at this site, that the new system was too close to the initial one and this would violate code standards. To rectify this matter it is the responsibility of the installing master plumber to bring this system into full compliance with the rules under which it was installed. The best option to do this is to install a mound system as suggested by Schmitt. Orders for corrective action will be written and served to the master plumber responsible for this installation, William Schumaker, should he not take actions necessary to replace this system in a timely manner. If there are any questions regarding this report please contact me. Le oy G. J sky, a water S ialist lero~ .'ansk Wisconsin. ov ail 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax cc: County ~ Plumber ~ CST [~' Owner ^ Other State ofWisconsin Memorandum/Correspondence DATE: October 8, 2008 DECEIVED OCT `(0 2008 TO: Pam Quinn and Tom Schmitt S7. CROIX COUNTY FROM: Leroy G. Jansky, PSS ZONING OFFICE POWTS Wastewater Specialist E-mail leroy. jansky@wisconsin.gov Fax (115) 726-2549 Voice (715) 726-2544 SUBJECT: Dan Anderson residence, Lots 91-92, Edgewood Estates III It appears that I may need to issue a Department order to Mr. Schumaker regarding the need to replace this system. If that is to occur, and since I didn't personally observe the conditions at Tom's B-1, I need a witness statement from you both. It is up to you if you provide me this information at this time. A short statement as to the relative location of the east side of the initial system to the west side of the replacement system is all I need. Thank you for your time. +L i commerce.wi.gov ^ isconsin Department of Commerce INSPECTION REPORT SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Ste 106 Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 www. commerce.wi.gov/sb (715) 726-2544 Jack L. Fisher, A.I.A., Secretary Date of Inspection: September 11, 2008 ~EC~, p~~ber ame and Address: Project Name: Anderson (formerly Ashley) W Iliam Schumaker, MP227990 Use: Residential $EP 1 $ ZO00 1 0 Scott Rd Legal Description: SE, NW, 7, 29, 19W H dson, WI 54016 Site Number: na ST. CROIX COUNTY Subdivision: Lots 91-92, Edgewood Estat zoNiNG Or~l~lt#ified oil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Hudson am Schumaker CST 253309 County: St. Croix 2113 80th Street Somerset, WI 54025 Plan Transaction Number: na Sanitary Permit Number: 430.503, 83788 and Owner Name and Address: 75020 Dan Anderson 335 Edgewood Dr Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Hudson, WI 54016 Persons Present: P. Quinn, D. Anderson This investigation was conducted at the request of the county agent and owner because of the relatively short life (four years) of the onsite system. This home's initial system was installed in 1986 after an investigation by me revealed that the system would be installed much deeper than originally permitted. Anew soil and percolation test was completed for the deeper system and the system installed accordingly. In 2003 a second system was installed to replace the initial one and now this system is not adequately accepting wastewater so the owner is servicing the tanks as needed to prevent a surface discharge. No surface discharge was noted during this investigation. We opened the manhole covers on the newer septic and dose tank for inspection and it did not appear that the riser ring joints were allowing water to infiltrate the tanks. This is a common location for leaks to occur. However, a visual observation is not a definitive test since the tank could leak from just about anywhere. A water tightness test could be performed if thought necessary to prove that the tanks are watertight. The present dispersal system has failed hydraulically according to the owner since when the pump doses the dispersal cell effluent discharges .from the end of the west cell (there are two cells) to the ground surface. Because a buried topsoil horizon was reported by the installer in 2003 and the assumed location of the initial system it had been assumed that the present system was actually installed in fill and partially over the initial system. The soil and site report by Thomas Schmitt, CST 227429, indicates that a portion of the initial system (1986) is below its replacement (2003). This can be confirmed in an approximate manner in that the initial system was reported to be 26 feet from the home and is 18 feet wide and therefore its eastern edge is about 44 feet from the corner of the home. The replacement system was reported to be 42 feet from the building. In addition, Schmitt's report states that at B-1 he uncovered part of the initial system at a boring depth of 81 inches. If this depth corresponds roughly to the top of the distribution pipe in the initial system, the elevation of that pipe would be 90.55 feet and this corresponds nicely with the top of pipe elevation by a county inspector of 90.56 feet. This is based on the original BM of 100.0 feet on top of the lot corner stake and then calculating the elevation of the top of the original septic tank inspection riser pipe based on the original septic tank outlet pipe elevation and the 2003 septic tank outlet elevation.. The top of the inspection pipe is at 95.70 feet as referenced to the original BM. The location of the initial system indicates that at least the west replacement cell is installed in fill. This was not appropriate in 2003 and is still not acceptable to install a system in fill without department approval. This is a violation of the conventional system component manual specifications in Table 2 that states that soil application A k ' " ~ September 11, 2008 Anderson Residence Page 2 of 2 rates used are for "in situ" (natural -undisturbed) soil. In addition, any fill material would have been required to meet standard ASTM C33 (washed sand) pursuant to Comm 84.30(6)(j),, Wis. Adm. Code. The most recent soil and site evaluation by Schmitt clearly shows that a massive sandy loam glacial till substratum exists at about 3.5 feet. This observation is also what the detailed soil survey reports the substratum material to be in the general area. Soils mapped at this location are the Amery soil series. Other nearby soil series includes the Jewett and Santiago series. They both have massive sandy, loam substratum material as reported by the soil survey and similar to the Amery series. It is unlikely that the present system is installed in anything but a massive sandy loam soil condition. The presence of massive sandy loam glacial till at the depth of the system installation complicates matters further in that the soil application rate for such material is 0.2 gpd/ft2. This is much lower than the 0.5 gpd/ft2 rate specified by the certified soil tester and used by the plumber to design the system. In contrast, an aggregate dispersal cell fora 3-bedroom home using a 0.20 gpd/ft2 soil application rate would be 2,250 ft2 in area and at a 0.5 loading it is only 900 ft2. In order to code compliant and operate correctly the system would have to be 250% larger than as installed. Based on the data and reports that I have reviewed it is certain that one of the replacement dispersal cells is installed partially in fill material and that all cells are vastly undersized in their ability to accept wastewater. In my opinion, these two conditions have lead to the premature hydraulic failure of the replacement system. The recommendation by Schmitt is to install a mound system in a new area using a minimum amount sand fi11 lift of 6 inches. This is the minimum sand lift allowed by the mound component manual. However, sometimes a thicker sand lift is better for treatment and dispersal but adds to cost. Overall, an above grade system will perform better since it will discharge effluent to soil that can readily accept and disperse it into the environment. The majority of the problems leading to this system failure can be largely attributed to inadequate work by the certified soil tester, Adam Schumaker. He did not take into account the location of the existing system and incorrectly described soil conditions that resulted in under sizing the dispersal cells and early failure. However, the designer and installer should have also realized, based on existing documentation and his own past experience at this site, that the new system was too close to the initial one and this would violate code standards. To rectify this matter it is the responsibility of the installing master plumber to bring this system into full compliance with the rules under which it was installed. The best option to do this is to install a mound system as suggested by Schmitt. Orders for corrective action will be written and served to the master plumber responsible for this installation, William Schumaker, should he not take actions necessary to replace this system in a timely manner. If there are any questions regarding this report please contact me. Le oy G. J sky, a water S ialist lero .~ansk Wisconsin. ov - ail 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax cc. County ~ Plumber ~ CST ~( Owner ^ Other commerce.iNl.gov Integrated Services Bureau WITNESS Inspection and Safety Support Section ~C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P.O. Box 7302 Madison, WI 53707-7302 Department of Commerce STATEMENT FORM Telephone: (608) 266-3151 www.commerce.state.wi. us/sb Please Print Clearly j,~ / Do NotWr)ite on the Back of This Form First Name: T /~'~' ~---~ Middle Initial: ~'" Last Name: ©(JJN Date of Birth: 2 ~ ~ ~~J street A/dd/ress: _//'f7 / ~/~/Z~Y1/Cyp EZ. ~ •~ ~ Sr. ~/~D ~ Lp , V ~T C~t~,/7~',1Z~ City: 1''I V~S~/~ State• ~i(.1..Z~ Zip• S/O J ~j r ~ Phone #: 7U ,3~`t7 2ND Phone #: 7( ~~) 3~~0 " 7 ZEmail: ~ C0; Sa~~re~ Gf"~~ (/111. US rRe: Dan Anderson o~n~sitye system Lots 91-92 Edgewood Estates III, Town of Hudson (SP 430503) J7't ~/.S/D~ ~~~Er~L000Gf.(l ~ Llitr /lY~ - dt~, /i9it"C/~Or:~sirr~ e.1 iJ ~d~n..~ ~A'/~i.rn /er n ..;..t. ~.- ~•-- ~/ 1 v' ~ v v ° '~ _ ~ l ~~ ~o Z _ ~ p~.r ~wr)t L~'~- /~ ~ !/1'lc~J Gila ~~~ GULZo~ 9~ • S~. ,de ~,*~/n'1 ~ ~ Zo-D 3 ~'r~~tcl~ t,~~ ~~~~~~,~ ~: ~/,-~:c / ,c~y wit 11~~'~,d~a~ deal Pcertiry that 1 have made the above statement of my own free will and without duress. I fully understand that I am not required to make a statement and by making this statement, I do so understanding it can and will be used in court as evidence. I am aware that there are penalties, up to and including prosecution, if this statement is made to decei or obstruct a due process~of I~w. LiJ• J ~ {~3~7~ Signat e: (~~Yt~1•-- Date: Page: _ of i ~- -_ -_FOR fl. Ff#G AL U - Deputy Receiving Statement: ^ Complaint Object Number ^ Witness Customer ID: Statement related to investigation by: ^Defendant ^Owner ^Witness ^Other: Notes: SBD-10877-a l:~CO F~~ ~' ~v emu- 2 ~ ~. a<%~ ura.~.0 GuPhe_ Csy,~~a2~ at o ~ ~~n~ ~ ~ c~.~' ~' e~i.~..~`D., _ _ /. e/I On 8/5/08 I conducted an on-site inspection of a test pit excavated adjacent to a prematurely failing POWTS. The property owner and CST Tom Schmitt requested the inspection to document soil conditions visible approximately 1 ft. west of a leaching chamber dispersal cell installed in 2003 as a replacement fora 1986 POWTS. The test pit was approximately 41 feet east of the house: The soils observed in the pit wall were comprised of fill, a mixture of organic and subsoil with no distinct horizons. The excavation encountered perforated pipe and rock from the ori¢inal 19A6 ~eepaQP hP~_~_ ~nmximately 81 inches beloyy grade. Bill Schumaker installed both systems and his as- built from 1986 reported the west edge of an 18' x 60' seepage bed was 26 feet east of the exterior of the house; the bed would extend to 44 feet from the house. In 2003, the inspection report documented the westerly edge of dispersal cells as 42 feet from the house. After comparing the elevation data obtained by county inspectors, the top of the distribution pipe for the 1986 system was 90.58' and the system elevation for the 2003 dispersal cell was 96.18'. It appears to this witness, based on observations and reported setback distances and elevations for both systems, that a portion of the 2003 POWTS was installed in soils overlying a portion of the 1986 seepage bed. 8002/Si/Oi "' .zoo .~annod sa~~~S utaci~zoN 88i03S\Saii~ SOS 8002\SaiI3 ~'O~~Og\fl2IdHSZd~~S//~aii3 sn •zr~1 •x-zo.ro-~u1z;s'o~~burnd IM `uospnH peon laeuolua~e~ 1061 •~da4 6uluoZ'8 6uluueld r(;uno~ wad •~g Z .io Z abed ,~~ ~ ~~~~ ~N1;1' N9.A~,~4W~ ~:. Z6'ii~IViRG August 26, 2008 Dan Anderson 335 Edgewood Drive Hudson, WI 54016 RE: Replacement POWYS, Town of Hudson Code Administration Lots 91, 92, and 93 of Edgewood Estates 715-386-4680 Parcel #020-1170-80-000 (Computer# 07.29.19.1063) Land Information ~ Planning Dear Mr. Anderson: 715-386-4674 The purpose of this letter is to document site conditions observed on August 5, Real Property 2008 relating to two existing Private On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems 715-386-4677 (POWYS) located on your property. I met you and Tom Schmitt, Certified Soil Tester, to inspect soil conditions found during his evaluation in preparation for Recycling 715-386-4675 another replacement POWYS. After reviewing soil report data and inspection reports from the 1986 and 2003 septic installations, there appear to be both soil and surface water issues affecting the operation of your system. The 1986 original POWYS was installed 26 feet from the house and the inspection report stated it would be a maximum 42" below grade. The as-built completed by William Schumaker stated the fill depth to top of pipe was 42". With a distribution pipe elevation documented at 90.56', the surface grade should not have been above 94.06'. The surface grade at test pit B3 on the 2003 soil report, immediately east of the old system, was at an elevation of 99.0'. A test pit excavated by Tom Schmitt next to the 2003 POWYS unearthed a portion of the 1986 system, which was more than six feet below today's surface of the ground. The 19$6~as-built and site plan both indicated that there was a "water drainage ditch to be cut" between the house and seepage bed and it appears the soil from that excavation was placed over top of the original POWYS. In 2003, an additional septic and dose tank and two distribution cells were installed, 125' and 118.75' long respectively. Lots 91, 92 and 93 are only 133 feet deep, from Edgewood Drive to the south property line. Using site measurements from the inspection report, it appears the 125' trench was installed across/above a portion of the 1986 seepage bed. The system elevation for this trench is at 96.18' (calculated from the septic tank outlet elevation) and the top of the distribution pipe on the 1986 POWYS was 90.58'. Soil test pit B3 only extended to 92.0'; the test pits completed in 2003 did not go deep enough to encounter the 1986 system. Soils profiles in test pits B2 and B3 were reported as sandy loam with "strong" structure (3msbk) and moist, firm ST CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 1 O 1 CARMICHAEL ROAD, HUDSON, Wl 5401E 715-386-4686 FAX consistence (mfi) in horizon #3, but it is likely that the soils were massive orweak-structured and difficult to dig out of the pit wall. The loading rate for massive sandy loam is 0.2 gpd/sq. ft., which is much lower than the 0.5 gpd/sq. ft. rate used to size the 2003 POWTS. In addition, the inspector noted in 2003 that "the system was installed below a buried "A"-horizon on north end only, by boring B2, as per plumber". The soil report prepared for the 2003 installation did not identify the buried A-horizon and indicated in situ soils were present. At this point, the 2003 POWTS is discharging wastewater to the surface of the ground. This is both a county ordinance violation (Section 12.F.4.e) and a Dept. of Commerce code violation (WI Comm 83.41(3) due to the potential health hazard. You have contacted Bill Schumaker, the plumber who installed both systems, as well as requesting an on-site inspection by the county. At this time, the plan is to bring the POWTS into compliance by obtaining a repair permit to excavate the 2003 Infiltrator leaching chambers and determine what specifically is causing the failure. Hopefully, soil conditions below the current system elevation will allow removal of the biomat and installation of new chambers in the 2003 tested area. I have discussed the situation with Leroy Jansky, WI DCOMM regional wastewater specialist, who will need to schedule a site visit if the soils at the infiltrative surface appear to be fill material. I did confirm that contaminated soil may still be incorporated into the backfill of the trenches as long as there is uncontaminated soil within a foot of the surface. Your initiative to correct the problem before our department received any complaints is much appreciated! e , amela Quinn POWTS Inspector #665054 CC: William Schumaker, 1070 Scott Rd., Hudson Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Tom Schmitt, CST ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 l O 1 CARMICfIAEL ROAD, HUDSON, W/ 54O 16 715-386-4686 FAX ~~r„-„ ~,,,,,,T.-.,,,,,, ~.,, ,,,- ,.,.,,,., ,-„ ~,,..~,-,-~,.~., ,.,~ ~ ~.- ~~- -- -~ ~" z ~~r~'°'. 112 ~ ~~ / d"Y~ ~ '~ ~-}~m wps ..~~ ~~ ~ ~o~~ C~-~~~~~ ~v~ ~i_ ~; '` r''j~ ~~,~~ , nn ~_ ~ ~ ~~~. /~ a ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~5~ ~~ ~ ~ z a ~ (~ ~ ~ o cc~"9"~ = ~____ ~~ ~ COPY S ~~~~ O ~,~~ ~ ~ .~~.~a~~9a~ ~~~~~~.~ i ~ ~ DERAF~TMENT OF INDUSTRY, INSPECTION REPORT FOR S LABOR & HUMAN RELATIONS AFETY & BUILDING P,O. BOX ?J69 PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEMS DIVISIO MADISON, 1fJf 53707 BUREAU OF PLUMBIN CONVENTIONAL ^ALTERNATIVE 3fa( pl ~-~- ' ^ Holding Tank ^ In-Ground Pressure ^ Mound e anLD.Number- (lt assigned) NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER: ~ ADDRESS OF PERMIT HOLDER: {NSPECTION DATE: BLS H Development 836 St. Croix St. N. Hudson, WI 54016 ~--fs- ~~ ~ ~'.~~ BENCH MAR (_Pgrmanent reference point) DESCRt OIFFE NT FROM PLAN: REF, PT. ELEV.: CST REF. PT. ELE V. SE , Section 7,T29N -R19W, TWri.of Hudson, Lots91-92, Edgewood Est, I I Name nl Plu mher: MP/MPRSW No. Cnunly. Sanitary Permit Number: William Schumaker 6382 St. Croix $37$$ SEPTIC TANK/HOLDING TANK: MANUF ACTUR ER. ~ l LIQUID CAPACITY TANK INLET LEV TANKgNK OI~EV_ WARNING LABEL LOCKING COVER i 1 ~ P OVI ED. PROVIDED. DY Y ~ ~, ~` ° ~ ES ^NO ^YES NO BEDDING: NT A VEN7 MAT( HIGH WATER NUMBER OF ROAD: ROPERTY WELL. BUILDING: VENT TO FRESI ALARM L ^YES ^NO ~,, LINE. `'" FEET FROM ^ ' AIR INLET: I , ' ~___ YES y NO NEAREST ..' / % 6 .~ .»~ ~ DOSING CHAMBER: ~~ MANUFACTURER BEDDING: LIQUID (:APAC17V .~~ VU iMj. L PUMP:SIVHON MANUF nl; i1IHEH '~ WARNING LAHEL LOCKING COVER ^YES ^NO _S PROVIDED. PROVIDED: ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO GALLONS PER CYCLE: P ~11PA coN RoLSOPERATIONAL NUMBER OF PHOpeHTV wELL sulLOwr, vENrroFRESI (DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FEET FROM LINE I AFR INLET: PUMP ON AND OFF) ^YES ^NO NEAREST --> --- _ _ SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM. Check the soil moisture at the depth of plowing ~ ' ~' I F, utnMF TEf< aaAT(HInL nlvD MARK w(, or excavation, Ilf soil can be rolled int o a wire, construction shall cease until FORCE the soil is dry enough to continue.) MAIN ~~~111 GONVENTIONGI SYSTEM• BED(TRENCH DIMENSIONS 6410TH j LE NGTR NO OF UIS TR PIPC SPn(;IN(~ THE NCNES L. COVER M14ATEHIAL'. ~ INSIDE UTA PIT ~ .• zPiTS LIQUID DEPTH: URA'G'EL GEF'i!1 BELOW PIP. S- / v`Y F L DE TH 60VE COVER t` 7 - I)ISTH PIF F UISTH PIPE E(.EV fNLff ELEV ENU -,, ~ ~ ; .. r .f , ~ ~> DI,S~ITFI, PJ- A ~ y{-(!'17~~ ~. (° 4 ~, ) f I NO UIS H pIPEy'~,,~ - NUMBER OF ROPERTV UNE. FEET FROM ,_; 7 _NEAREST ~_ ,~ . WELL BUILDING: VENT TO FRESI I ET L °°` ~,~ta- .,~.-, 4, -~ MOUND SYSTEM: G: Y(~ ~ °~ 5, `~ '~j1"" ~~YtYn Y! pr~1 ~~~ +_~ ~_r ~'SY"t4 ; ~ S ~L~ Mound site plowed perpendicular to slope ~/"~ Check the texture of the fill material for PROVIDEADIAGRAMOFSYST M~ and furrows thrown upslope: mound systems to make certain that it ON REVERSE SIDE. SHOW ELEVA- L meets the criteria for medium sand. TIONS MEASURED. ^YES ^NO SOIL COVER TEXTURE pFHMANf N7 MnHKf HS OHSER VA TI(1N WELLS _ ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO DEPTH OVER TRENCH BED DEPTH OVFH TRENCH HEU UFPiH OF TUP$(IIL tinUUFU SEEUFU MULCHED CENTER EDGES ^YES. ^NO ^YES ^N. ^YES ^NO PRESSURIZED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: BED/TRENCH DIMENSIONS ELEVATION AN ~ DISTRIBUTION i INFORMATION CO T`om`, . "1 .VIDTH LENGTH NO. OF LATERAL SPACING (iHAVEL DEPTH kif LOW PIPE FILL DEPTH ABOVE COVER TRENCHES: +L MANIFOLD PUMP MANIFOLD DISTR. PIPE MANIFOLD MATERIAL Nn UISTH UISTR PIPE UI$TV71BU ilON PIPE MATERIAL & MARKING ELEV.. ELEV. DIA ELEV. PIPES DIA D HOLE 512E HOLE SPACING GRILLED CORRECT LY COVER MATERIAL VERTICAL LIFT CORRESPONDS TO APPROVED PLANS ( ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO PERMANENT MARKERS: ^YES ^NO OBSERVATION WELL&. ~ ^YES ^NO NUMBER OF (PROPERTY L: F£ET FROM LINE:C0~1 NEAREST-- "' BUILDING: _--- ~4'~ `~ ~ 0 0' ~ ,~. ~a. O~ v~'~ ` ~ ~:~ ~ stns `1-ono, ~ ~ ~ 1~ Sketch System on ' Z~Z ~ i^I~!' ~ vl ~~ ~6(~j Retain in county fi a for aud~6t, ~ ~~~ 0 GTZ Reverse Side. ,-_,..._...___._. - , SIGNAT E: ..---~"' TITLE '- - '~ DILHR SBD 6710 (R. 01(82) _,~-•-~'"- - ,• ~ f _~ .......PV ' #1so2 REPOR ~ ,~ , SCOIiS%ff SOIL EVALUATION Departrnent of Commerce in arx~ordance with Com .code Page 1 of 4 Division of Safety and Buildings R~G~~~ ~(7 Schmitt Soil Testing, Inc. ~unly Attach ~mpiete site plan on paper not ass than 8F x 1 ust inches in s¢e. Plan St. Croix include, but Trot limited to: vertical and horizontal refen3rt d I t Um point (BM), r ' t ~ ~ pare:el I.D. percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, an n arr~p~ ar c , 020-1170-80-000 Please p-irrt all infotTnafyo p~ Reviewed By Personal information You Provide maybe used for secondary ~~~ ~ b ~ ~,~) (m))• Properly Owner Property Locaflon Anderson, Dan Govt. Lot SE1/4, NW1/4, S7, T29N, R19W Property Owner's MaiNng Address lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# 335 Edgewood Dr 91,92,93 Edgewood Estates City State Zip Code Phone Number ~ City ~ vNage ®Town Nearest Road Hudsonnn WI 54016 Hudson Ed ewood Drive ^ New Construction ~~ ®Residential / Number of bedrooms a derived design flow rate 450 GPD ®Replaoement ^ Public or r~mmercial - Descn~be: Parent material Glacial till (Amery Series) Flood plain elevation, if applicable na ft. General comments and recommendations: Recommend t3" mound. System elevation is 117.4' based off contour line established at 116.9'.. Slope of area is 17%. Grading may have to be done to divert water around mound. Bonng # ~ Bonng ® Pit Ground surface elev. 101.60 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Sop Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consists Boundary Roots GPD/ft~ i Munsell Gr. Sz Sh. •Eft#t •Eff#2 1 0-81 Badcfill material ----------- - ----- ------ Pit is in baclcfilt material, it is along side of the Infiltrator chambers and directly over the perforated pipe in the original (bed) drainfieid that was Bonng # ^ ~~ ®Pit Ground surface elev. 106.95 ft. Depth to limiting factor 32 in. Sop Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Stnldure Consists Boundary Roots GP D/frz in. Munsell Qu. Sz Cont. Color Gr. Sz Sh. `Eft#7 •Etfrx2 1 0-5 10yr3/3 none sit 2mgr mvFr cs 2c,2m .6 .8 2 5-14 10yr5/3 none sii impl mfr gw 2m,2f .4c .6 3 1427 10yr5/6 none sit 2fsbk mfr gw 2f,2m .6 .8 4 27-32 10yr4/6 none sl imsbk mfr gw 2m .4 .7 5 32-88 5yr4/4 none ~ Om mfi gw .2 .6 Starting at 32", very dense sandy loam, restrictive layer. Effluent #1 = BOD 5> 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L • Effluent rY2 = BODS <_30 mg/Land TSS <_30 mglL CST Name (Please Print) Signature: CST Number Thomas J. Schmitt ~ 227429 ~~ Schmitt Soil Testing, Inc. Date Evaluation Concluded Telephone Number 1595 72nd Street Never Richmond, WI 54017 ~~~ 715-247-2941 sec-s~o cxmao) ~V ~' 020-1170-80-000 Page 2 of ~ Property Owner Anderson, Dan Parcel ID # U Boring # ^ Boring Ground surface elev. 116.30 ft. Depth to limiting factor 39 in. ®pi Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth in { Dominant Color Munseli Redox Description Qu. Sz Coat. Color Texture Structure Gr. Sz Sh. Consistence Boundary Roots GP •EiF#1 D/ftz •EfrM2 . 1 0-6 10yr3/4 none sll 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 •8 2 6-27 10yr5/3 none i 2m~k mvfr gw 2f,ivf .6 .8 3 27-39 10yr5/6 none sil 2msbk mfr gw 2vf .6 .8 4 39-60 10yr5/6 none sf Om mfi a 2m,2f .2 •6 5 60-104 7.5yr4/6 none sl Om mfi -- .2 .6 Starting at 39", very dense sandy loam, firm consistence. Restrictive layer. Boring # ^ Boring tD limiting factor 4Q" in. ® P8 Ground surface elev. 116.30 ft. Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots in. Munsell Qu. Sz Coat. Color Gr. Sz Sh. Rate Soil Applcation ~~ GPD/ft~ f~2 1 0-18 10yr3/4 none I 2mgr mfr a 2m,2f .6 •8 2 18-26 10yr5/3 none sil 2fsbk mfr gw 2m,2f .6 .8 3 2b-40 1t1yr4/6 none sl 2msbk mfr gw 2vf .6 1.0 4 40-53 10yr5/6 none sl Om mfi gw ---- .2 .6 5 5336 5yr4/6 none sl Om mfi ---- .2 .6 Starting at 40", very dense sandy loam, massive, restrictive layer. Boring # ®Pfl ~ Ground surface elev. 113.0 ft. Deptt- to 1uniFmg factor 36 in. Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots in. Munseil Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. Soil Application Rate GPDIft' •Etflx'1 •Etr#2 1 0-16 10yr3/3 none I 2mgr mfr cs 2m,2f .6 .8 2 16-26 10yr5/3 none I 2fsbk mfr gw 2m,2f .6 .8 3 26-36 10yr5/6 none sil 2ms1~k mfr --- 2vf .6 .8 Shovel pit, didn't dig with backhce to avoid disturbing soil. All other pits were already restrictive. Effluent #1 = BODg> 30 <_ 220 mglL and TSS >30 <150 mglL "Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/L and TSS <_30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. if you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3 t51 or TTY 608-264-8777. SdM11NY 5911 TdAMIg, L1C. tmn wen ro MNMI Paged of 4 ~~~~ ~ Conducted For: Sclnt~itt Soil 'T'esting Inc. Narr~: 1}an 8c Shamwn Anderson Thomas J. Schmitt, CST 22?429 Address: 335 Edgewood Drive 1595 72nd St. City, State: Zip: Hudscm, WI 5401 b New ltichmand, ~. 54027 ewood Estates III Pho~: 725-247-2941 ~ Subd Name: ~ Lat No.: 91, 92, & 93 s• n~ 8 i ~ f ~ B' Legal Descnption% SEI/4 1vW1/4 S7 T29N R19'6V ~ 13ackhoe pit Township, Coin: i~iudson, ~. Croix n ui cast iron pipe on ~Srst c tank from house ,,~ Bench 2~viark EL 100.00' Top of mspectio plug ~ Alternate Bench Mark EL i 17.70' Nail in 9" Poplar Tree Colour Length 75' Slopes 17°!o Contour Line EL 1 16.90' Seale 1" = 40' ,L ~9'e +,JOc~ ~r~°~e ~~ ~~~ ~~~ r~ y D ~~ 1 ~¢~~ _ / i s~ d ~ t ~ f ` ` ~l .~, ~ ~ Q ~,~ ~a~ `k ~ ~,~~ ~'' A ~ 1~° Y B3 ~_ h . ` :~- .- ~,. I. ''~y /~~ ~ / ~ f o~~~ L,NC ~.. /1~ ~e ~C ~~s~-//a.~- b P Sure ~o c~.uer.~- olfa,~ a y~ a~ h ~cRS$~.y ~-o ta,v~d~ s ~~ e,z ~ ®~ st'~e . ~6 f I~~~-~ ~6 ,fin, .~ ~~~~ ~,d. . ~ : QxcIMS Viewer Page 4~®f ~/ .,. ` ,~ ~ ~`` ~~ ~ v, 1 mot. , ~ • ~,,~ ~ "j' ~~ ^~3~ ~. 5 ~ a ,. ~ ~~~ ~. ,; ~ - - ,~ _ r ,;. a _ , ~ . ~- ~GEUUOQp S8C2 ~4... 1 ~. S C rt1. ~. ~ ~ • ~ O SYSTEMS I N C July 29, 2008 Mr. Dan Anderson 335 Edgewood Drive Hudson, WI 54016 Mr. Anderson, Based on our observations and the photos you supplied from your exploration last year we were able to draw some reasonable conclusions as to why your system has had some problems over the last few years. To summarize these are some key points: 1. The system was installed in December, and there was no grass cover over the system until the following spring/summer. A system with no vegetative covering will allow the system to become saturated during the spring melt or during rainstorm events. The hillside likely compounded this issue. 2. The pump chamber and tank are in a depression (swale -low lying) area, all of the surrounding area drains into this spot where it will collect and pond, though you've attempted to divert it. Note that the tank or pump chamber may not be watertight and therefore the system may be inundated with excess water. 3. The pictures from inside the chamber showed pretty "clean" effluent; therefore it may be diluted from the water intrusion. Without further excavation or a water metering device it would be difficult to draw a different conclusion. 4. The pictures show that the chambers appear to be deformed and limited soil intrusion. There were random piles of dirt in the chambers that may have come from breaks in the tops of the chambers where soil may have then fell into the chamber. This may have been caused by the weight of the saturated soil or by follow-up springtime landscaping activities. 5. Overall from the pictures reviewed we can see no fault of the chamber product. We will however participate in the resolution. With our customer release document signed we would like to offer you chambers and a control panel as a good will gesture to insure you have a safe operational system. Your contractor will simply inform us how many units and end plates are required for the replacement installation and contact me and I can come out and assist them in programming the Aquaworx Control panel. With the control panel in place, the system can be set up to spread the pump load over more events therefore lengthening the life of your system. It will also help us detect if water intrusion through the tanks is having an effect on the operation. Please contact me by phone if you have any questions at 888-232-2624. Sincerely, ~~~ ~r~ Jeff Iverson Senior Sales Representative Infiltrator Systems, INC. Jeff Iverson, Senior Sales 61363 252nd Avenue • Mantorville, MN 55955 • (507) 635-3548 • Fax (507) 635-5429 J ~`tlP~r.Sb~1 ~ r vt~i ~-~~c,-~ rSyS ~f~t~s Vl.~~ ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 1 http://www.landinfo.co.saint-Croix.wi.us/website/LRPortaUARCIMS/MapFrame.asp?PIN= 9111!2008 ~ ,.. ~No ~ c,wo ~ o m~ I ~~ f I , c .~ I ~ ~ I ~ 3 I I 3 :~ I :: ~ I :: I CA 3 T. T. m Z .. I o +~ D -i Z N Z ., I o o D Z 2 Z ~ ~ ~, y c N 5. y 0 G rt w y O~ O O 3 y O G ~ w y OD ? O v O O G lrtD Q. .3i 7 7 t9 H ~~ Z~ ~ y OD .~ I N a ~ y ~ ~ +n +n w (D O CD W ~ I a 51 4l v N V) to ~ ! /+ ~ I ~ N y I O ~ tp C C n (D , ~ C7 fD ~ ~ n I °i ~ o ~ w I a o W ~ ~. o ~' 7 tl! W y y Ut ~ 7 N W y y Cn I o ~~ m I °• s 5', ~ m i a a I U> Z D m ? ~ ~ a ~ D a F ~ D I v G ~ n° G ° I a ¢i ~ ° I ~ W _ ~ I ~ O° "' -~ o ~' r °• I O "' o o o ~ ~ a I - O "' a ~ 0 _' p 0 I ~ ~ `° ~ I I ~~ 0 0= I W W G y O O= I O O G O ~ G N ~ I Z o ' O O O ~ ~ I ' 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I Cn V ~ ~ N V1 U N N N C o ~ ~ l 3 N N A ~ I ~ ~i = ~ I . ~ ~ ~ O C o I 3 ~ ~~ O o I o ~ 5 ~ m '' =' °~ v ~' x ~ :°. ~' ~ rn ~ '' i ~ ~ fD m c'D . ~ ~ m I ~ . ~ 3 oyi I I N ~ ? .. I ~ 7 .. i a rt rt I ~ ~ I 3 I o D D~ o I =~ u I I O ~ v ~ ~ I o. m I o m m I ~ m m I a N I C I ~ N C C ? ~ C fD ~ C . I w (D (7 d ~ I a ~ O ~ n ~O I ~ O y ~ I ~ a I a I I ~ I I W .~ I ~ -o i ` + ~ I I o. • 3 i a ~+ 3 I O T O M N y ~ Z ~ I C I G ~, N w I o x a ~ ~ i ~• oo a { m a m a ~ ~ ~ ~ a I . ~5 a o ~ I ~ ~ . ~ i rn N ~ d ~ ~ N C fD ~ . L Q' - ip p j I Qo~• o a I ~ a a a I >• o I ~~-o m ~ I ~~. ~ y I m a m y I ~ ~ ~ I ~ w I 3 ° "~' I ~ O I I I ~ x c'p I c I I ~~0~ I fl. a ~ c~ i v a Q I ~• I y N fD a I '6 I ~ Nm I ~ I N ~ ti I ~ I I o a I -' I o ~ I o I a I o I `~ I m I m I o ~ I 0 o I o 0 I °o o. I °o a I °o n c ~~''I ~ A ~ ~ m 1 3 ^~ s o ~ ~ I: N 3 O .4 I. _~ '':. ': '. w'. N N CWJt I ~1 ~ d a ~ 0 ooQ ~ o ', ~• O f0 ': ap = O C ': O. I y '. '0 ~ O O ~~~' O O o_ d b °' ': ~o .. Q1 Z `~. ~ ~ 'D m N y ~ C N ~ ro ~ d 7 C a ~ ~ a ~ °o :` !2 Z w ~ ~_ T C 3 a N m °: 3 eo Z D ~ m o ? ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ d # ~ 1 C ~ N G ~ Q ~ ..~ V ~ O '••~ O Q 7 W p O ~ ~ ff 9 m o m a ~ ~ m c~'WO a m m m y ? Z n ~ ~ A ~ ~ m N ~ J z a ~ m J ,.. ~ . , ~~~~ ~~~~ ___-- ~~Z~~o y G~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.~ v 3:~ ~i5'- 7~~-~~5~ ~~~a~~ ~~~ J~~" ~~a~ ! '2 ~,,, d~:~ ,~a.~- ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ fed, a~Gu~ u~~7-~' . Wis~.,onsin Department of Commerce ~ PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM S ~fety and Building Division ` ~ INSPECTION REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Ashle ,Steve Hudson Townshi CST BM Elev: Insp. B M Elev: _ BM Description: / • yy~~ iV / E I " ~~ \ j ` l ,J, • • TANK INFORMATION Manufacturer Demand bti~ ~ ` Model Number n ~Z ~ ti DH Lift t Friction Loss ystem Head DH Ft 0 2-~-( - IZ•Zt Forcemain Length I Dia. Zrr Dist. to well TYPE MANUFACTURER CAPACITY Septic l ~ ~ ~' --Fivvl,av~ d ~ ~ ~D Dosing l.~ ~ I S(~2 1Z~ Aeration Holding TANK SETBACK INFORpaq~lON TANK TO P/L ELL BLDG. Vent to Air Intake ROAD a Septi 1 > ~ r t ~ t '..`~ s~z ~ ~` ~z~ ~ Z 3 ~ ~-.~ Aeration Holding PUMP/SIPHON INFORMATION ~~ SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM a~ BEDITRENCH Width r Length DIMENSIONS 2 ~a SETBACK SYSTEM TO INFORMATION ~;o-vt, cr RIBUTIO ST M v ELEVATION DATA STATION Benchmark Alt. BM SUHt Inlet r SUHt Outlet ~ ~,t [,~t Inlet~~ ~ Dt Bottom Header/Man, Dist. Pipe ~0J Bot. System st County: St. CI'OiX Sanitary Permit No: 430503 0 State Plan ID No: ~ --~> Parcel Tax No: 020-1170-80-000 Section/Town/Range/Map No: 07.29.19.1063 BS HI FS ELEV. o -/~ --~ t -~ ~ `~ bpi, ~~ ~ ~ S:I o 61 9 , v ox. s' 9~ ~"b w.9 I~•`~a , ~i~~. Q2. __ ~~•5~ 3-~ ~•~0 9~•`fs' Inside Dia. (Liquid Depth CHAMBER 0 /~~f~l %/ S ~ ~ 7i ~ ~` ~~ i 7 r:rzi• Header a ifoTfl t istribution ~ x Hole Size x Hole Spacing Vent to Air Intake ,() ~~ Q"y`~'C ~ ( ape( ~ 5-2e ~ ~Z Len Dia ength Dia Spacing SOIC COVER x Pressure Systems Only xx Mound Or At-Grade Systems Only J ~~ ' 2"~ Depth Over Depth Over xx Depth of xx Seeded/Sodded xx Mulched Bed/Trench Center Bed/Trench Edges Topsoil Yes I~ No - j_ ii Yes No COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies, persons present, etc.) Inspection #1:_~ / ?JI /~ Inspection #2: !/---i--~ Location: 335 Edgewood Drive Hudson, WI 54~016~(SE 1/4 NW 1/4 7 T29N R19W) Edgewood Estates III Lot 91,92&93P/arcel No: 07.29.19.1063 1.) Alt BM Description = ~+3[-- Yom) S 1 """`^""'..'" td~-Yr' ~~~ _ k'~~ C ~',5/ SOLI 'Ta ~i;tJv~'~' 2.) Bldg sewer length = ~ /~ , -amount of cover = ~ •-~ ~~ 3~ syn. ~ts~,a..~ ~- ~ ~ - I•wr'~~- ~,n,~.,,~ o ~s Use otheslside for additional information. No ~ ~I___ SBD-6710 ( .3/97) Date / Insepctors Signature Cert. No. "y) ~~~~5 ~S~ui~ ~ s~~-1~ ~,~- J Q ~/ ~ ~r ~~~sL 210 ~~ i ~U ,cam ~ "- G ~ - . ~ ,~ ~~~ ,, ~~ ~~ ~-~ ~ ~'~ ' ~' CC'?~' ~ r ~`~"" .~ -o 0 o ~~ ~' r ~ ~ ~ ~ 2' --- ------- ,, ~{'~~-e ~. ,Orr ?V?~ -- _ _ S ' n ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ 4 V~ ~ .~.~-, was ~ ~' ~ ,~ ~ ,~~~'~~~ ~ ~ ~ r t~vt u v~-? q 3 ,~~I ~ ( ~ ~ G 1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~,o~~ ~ wa C~-x~~~~ S y s ~~~~~~~ ~- ~ ?•sv ~-P~..~ q~ COPY '~ Safety and Buildings Division ., 201 W. Washingto $t~pj_ ~~,,~ ~rO~~,~ Madison, I 53~E~IVED pepartment of Commerce (608 266-3I51 Sanitary Permit Applicat' n T 2 9 2003 In accord with Comm 83.21, Wis. Adm. Code, personal inform 'on yok 1~rovide may he used for secondary purposes Privacy Law, s15. il)(rnj i• CROIX COUNTY ZONING OFFICE I, Application Information -Please Print All Information Property Owner's Na me S7a! v 1t° /~Sti ~ ~ y Property Owner's M ailing Address 'z-" 33 S- ~~y~e ~~ o City, St<~tte Zip Code ~ Phona Number .,wads-o,y ~J,` ~5-5~d~'6' ! ~"y61~' j2~,5=38~ -~G~,~~? II. Type of Building (check ail that apply) 1 or 2 Family Dwelling -Number of Bedrooms ~~ ^ PublicJCommerciai -Describe Use 17 State Owned -Describe Use __~~x-~2s ~„~___,_~~ III. Type of Permit: (Check only one box on line A. Complete line B if applicable) A. ^ New System eplacement System L' Treatment/Halding Tank Replacement Only i County ~~ t~r~o t'~~ Permit Number (to be filled in by Co.) Plan T.D. Number t Address (if different than mailing address) Parcel ty ~.ot;Y v - t I LV -• ZS V - CJ~~~ ~I Property Location _ l - s~ '~.~~ 'k,Section 7 (circle ) T ~9 N; R~E ^City_i~Village,~'ownshiQ of I~GQS~~ ^ Other Modification to Existing System I IB • ^ Permi[ Renewal ^ Permit Revision ^ Change of ~~[~ Permit Transfer to New List Previous Permit Number and Date Issued Before Expiration Plumtiet Owner JV. T of P~WTS S stem: (Check all that a 1 •} ~~ - y pP y ___ _ ,,'Von -Pressurized In-('rroutrd ^ :Mound > 24 in. of suitable soil ^ Mound < Z4 in. of suitable soil ~! At-Grade ^ Single Pass Sand Filter ^ Constructed Wetlarxi ^ Pressurized In-Ground ~ Holdin Tank ^ peat Filter t g ^ Aerobic Treatment Unit ^ Recirculating Sa er ...0 ^ Recirculating Syndretic Media Filter eaching Cham r Drip Line rl Gravel-less Pipe ^ Other (explain) ~.5 V, Dis ersallTreatment Area Information: ,3'~ G/t a_w-.•ba r s i ~~ t Design Fiaw (gpd) Design Soil Application Rate(gpdsi) Dis ersal Area Required-~(st~ ~Ijispersal Area Proposed (s System Elev on !Gd rVI. Tank Info j Capacity in Total Number Manufacturer ~ Prefab! Site Steel Fiber Plastic Gallons Gallons of Units Concrete Constructed I Glass ~ New Existing ~"~ ~ ` 1 I{ Tanks Tanks ~ G ~ r~ Sepnc or Holding Tank ~y /~~~, ~ -- V\ ~,r;G,g e r Aerobic Treatmem Unit -r-- VII. Responsibility Statement- [, the undersigttt;d, assttme responsilrility far ' ~ llatiou of the POWTS shown on the attached plans. T. ! Plumber's Na me (Print) Plumber's Si gtteture 2 MPRS Number Business Phona Number ~~ l~' l: m S~`scr- ~.etlfc~ o?a ~Q?Q 71.5 ,3 ~ 3.lr=L / ~ Plumber's Addre ss (Street, City, State, Zip Code) ,. ~ ~~ ~ Q~~ ~~/~ ~ ~ VIII. Count IDepartraent 'Use Oniy ' V-~''~~~7--~ - -_ Approved ^ Disappraved Sanitary Permit Fee (includes Groundwater Date Issued Issuing Agee[ Signature (No Stamps) Surcharge Fee) ~/~^ ~, ^ Owner Given Reason for Denial ~ ,~~~~ 0~ ~ ~~ IX. Conditions of Approval/Reasons for Disapproval ~-~' SYSTEM OWNER: 3~ ~L.K~c~.i,,,,~_ SYS~-~. ~~` ~ a.~a~ 1 Septic tank, effluent fitter and ~ ` _ ~~J dispersal cell must all be serviced / maintained t~ ~ Goth ~u~sllt, ,~ as per management plan provided by plumber. 2. All setback requirements must be maintained as per applicable code/ordinances. (to the County only) for the system oa paper nat less than 8112 x 11 ,/ SBD-6398 {R. 01!03) S v~ ~~~' 3,~ ~!-/©~v~ l~~''°%~G dpi 4~ ~Gl..S4~/ ~Y~~ ~~. ~oC~ i C~-k~~~~ ~~~ _ ~ O C ~_ -o r 0 ___ - _ ~~,.,a,~ ~.. - - - - -~- ra n ~ i.. ..,•~ * ~ yy r S, . i ~ L ~t~.....• . ~•..•++M~~ .1 1. 11 • L i ~ ~ b i ~. ~ V i. ~ ^ ~ ^ •r~ '~~ ^ /` 71 11 ~' ~ . i fl ~ ~ .r p • r.. i+, ^ "".'r- 4" CI V$Ni ~IP£ .I2" MIN. ABOVE GRADE' b ~ 2S' FROM DOUR. WiNDQW OR FRESH AIR ZNTAKE FINI~SHE r,RArE 4"' CT RISER ~--.+ wA:FR TIGiiT SEALw ~"` "i"` ~PAROYEO f A ,~p~ ~, f -s.-. 8 ;0 0 5~7t, ID ~ ~ ~- T P~JMP vv^FF ELEV . ..,._...FT. '°~." ~ ~~~ SE°TIC r DOSE fiANK MANUFALT{1RER: T'nNK Si DES : SEi~TI C DOSE i~EAC~!~RPRQQ6 JU NCiI ON B ^vX '~tITH CQNDU7T A PPR 0',l EIS ~°..'3H4:~E CGV £~ W i PAD L4C K ~ t~ARMrMG LABEL .; ~7 ' ~~ r.i.,, • x ~~ GAJ~ ~ ~ ' ~~ TIGHT ~ '~ ~! ' Sc.AL ~ ~ALM ! ' ,ON ~ ~~' _~ ~ ,, ~OF: J :1 3" AFFRG4'ED $£DDING UNDER TANK r GAL, o~ GAL. ~L.9FcM MANUFACTURER: ~~~ ~ -~_r.•. M OA E L NUM ~ ER : ~~ ~ SWITCH TYPE: ~,*~.~.. ', ~,p MANtIFAC ;'URER MpDEL NUMBER : - _~~'oo~~ ~~~ `-`~ SWITCH TYFE: ""~'~"~'"`~~`` `EQUiRED DISCHARGE St,AT~l~'p Gg,M ~~ ~ vAF~ROV~D JQIN'fS W'ST~ APP~V~D P IPA 3 ~ .o~ra scnxo, sate '~ a R I`5ER EX: fi PERMxTT~D ONLY ?F TANK ~NUFACTJRER SAS A~FRavA? COiv'tiRETE PAD IvtiwSER DOSES PER DAY: ~~ ~OSL' V C;.,UME INC ~,~3DrNG FLa4v8ACK: !5`~ ~ rA:~, CAP4CI:IES: A ~ ~~~ I:vC~:ES ~.~....,...GA1„ ~ _ _•„_ 7 INCHES ~ ~YGA~.. C r ~,~,,, INCHES ~ (GAL, FUMF ~ ALARM ~+'iRING AS riR ILf~ic 16.23 WtiC ERT~,CAL '0i~'FiRE11CE BE_ OFF AND DI ~* MINIMUM NET4d0RK SUPPLY PRESSURE p STRS HJ ~ I Oh Fa PE l,2 rEET' d .~,~,,,, FEET F QRCT:MAiN x~i"0 FT / ? 0 0 F':. ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~, • ~•`~ F EF, T FR1 •„ T. ~?N FAC ~ OR ! _? FEr fi T.OT,~L D~'NAM:C HEAD r EM'" :tm~NAL DIMEA' Z~ati5 CF PUM? :'ktr'': ~ ~Gh'EDt / ~_. ~d" ;.W,., ~~ LiL'ENSF N.'MBi~': ~~~1 .~~ ~~d ~ ,. r . _ ~A... , _ ...y~~~~,~_~~~-``` ~~.r APPLICATIONS Specifically designed for the following uses: • EfFluent systems • Homes • farms • Heavy duty sump • Water transfer • Dewatering SPECIFICATIONS • Solids handling capability: '/." maximum. • Capaaties: up to 60 GPM. • Total heads: up to 31 feet. • Discharge size: 1'/z° NPT. • Mechanical seal: carbon- rotary/ceramic-stationary, BUNA-N elastomers. • Temperature: 104°F (40~C) continuous t40°F (60°C) intermittent. • Fasteners: 300 series stainless steel. • Capable of running dry without damage to components. Motor: • EP04 Single phase: 0.4 HP, 115 or 230 V, 60 Hz, 1550 RPM, built in overload with automatic reset. • EP05 Single phase: 0.5 HP, 115 V, 60 Hz, 1550 RPM, built in overload with automatic reset. • Power cord: 10 foot standard length,16/3 SJTOW with three prong grounding plug. Optional 20 foot length,16/3 S1TV11 with three prong grounding plug (standard on EP05). ~ 2000 Goulds Pumps Effective February, 2000 63871 • Fully submerged in high grade turbine oil for lubrication and efficient heat transfer. Available for automatic and manual operation. Auto- matic models include Mechanical Float Switch assembled and preset at the factory. FEATURES ^ EP04 Impeller: Thermoplas- tic Semi-open design with pump out vanes for mechanical seal protection. ^ EP051mpeller. Thermoplas- ticenclosed design for improved performance. ^ Casing and Base: Rugged thermoplastic design provides superior strength and corrosion resistance. ^ Motor Housing: Cast iron for effident heat transfer, strength, and durability. ^ Motor Cover. Thermoplastic cover with integral handle and float switch attachment points. ^ Power Cable: Severe duty rated oil and water resistant. ^ Bearings: Upper and lower heavy duty ball bearing construction. AGENCYlISTING ~,• Canadian Starda~ds AssodaGon (CSA listed model numbers end in "F" or "C".) Goulds Pumps is ISO 9001 Registered. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 caaPaaTV k ~{'Zc~- oulds P~Limp~< ITT Industries ~: ~~•. . ~^_ , ~= e ~ •~ .x ~3 ~= ~. N~ ~~;= .. ~ ~~ ;~ ~~ ~ ~ #~ M =E $ ~~ -~~ ~~ w ~x ~t~ ~i ~i >~ ~, r r~ ~% ~e M Y ~c i s >" m N ~: O m am ~ ~ s *' Q w ~ ~ m ©. 0 e N ~ V1 (/1 o ~' m " m ~ x x cn ~ N ~ X `~~x cw -.• -,,,,_ ~ ~ • ~ ~ S ~ zp-nr ~ va' ~ ~ co ~ c ~-~g~ ~ ~~~~? „ ~ N a'c a ~ ~ to °_. ~- 'D ~ a ~~ ~ m ~ acr c~'r~°°'o ci, ~ ~ o~'~~ R~ cis a °: 3 ~ o' ~ g ~ ~ ~ m ~~ ` ., ~~~ a ~~' ~~w c~ '~ ~ a C~FL s {avert 1 i' r~ ~ ~. Q ~ ~," ,~ ~_ ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~- ~~~ ~ ~ ~ r: ~ ~ Q ~ Kwon {d a ~ ~ ~a j 1 ~ I~ ~~ ~a . ,,,; . .. ' ~ -_ ' Wiscollsm rbnerlt of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page I of DePa Division of Safety and Buifd'mgs in accordance with Comm 85. Wis. Adm. Code Coup ~-. ~fOiX Attach complete s16D plan on paper not less ttrart 8 1!2 x 11 inches in s¢e. Plan must O J fidude, but not limibad to: vertical and horizorrfal t+!lferorlcs p~U (BM), direction and Parser ID. ©~ D ~ I I ~v_ ~ Q percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arm r [- C ~ / C nce to nearest road. Please nt ~r-BI1eAw~llbn~ by! Date Paraalrel infomrstion you provide may used for seoorldary purposes {Privacy arr. >ti 15.04 {1) (m)?• ~ ~ Q Properly Owner O ~ ~ 2 Property Loptwn ~ V ~~1 Govt Lot ' ~= 1fA JULt)'tl4 S 7 T ~ ~ N R (q E (or Property /hrtre~s MaUing Address ST. l FFICE t # # ~. Name or CSM# ~~ 5 _ e ,.~, oo~l 5 ~ S-~ , .,._-- ~L ... ~ rt11.11t,Cr .fir 11 V)Oaae Town Nearest Road _ Q GPD Q New Conslrud)on Use: ~ Residential / Number of bedrooms ~ Code derived design flow rate y~«~ Replacement ^ Public ofcxJrtlmercial-Describe: Parent materiel _._~, (l ._ ___ Fbod Plain elevation if applicable r. !~~~ ~/~ ft• Ger-eral ownments ~~~~ .e ~ Z, J t ,.~~ ~r~/~ LI /~.3' °° f~~ %iri-t ~~ l'7d~ and recommendations: ~ /~9c/~ f/Q/~cr( j ~l/` Lc,~cu~~.~/p~.Ch ~dG,O ~ ~ ~,~;~~ zk~~orl~2e-4 {y~ihes g ^ ~9 Borin # ,(Tr Pit Ground surface elev. `I p • ~~ft. Depth to limiting factor _ ~ in. ~d Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Cobr Redox DestxWstion Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots •Eff#GPD 'Eff#Z in. Mansell t]u. Sz. Cont. Cobr Gr. Sz. Sh. I 2 d-Ip ~- 30 10 3l3 1 ~ 3 S.I S i l ~~ ,Z rr~r -~- cS c 2c- ( - .~ Boring # (] boring qq~ ~ f1~•b1i ~y Pit Ground surface elev. ~' l.~ ft- Depth to fimitfig facs:or in. campy bon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD1fP •Eff#1 'Eff#2 fi. Mansell 4u. Sz Cont Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 5 . ~ ~ (~-(p lp ~3~3 ~i) Zms r c l c - Z -I(~ / 3/ i' SL~ r cs c - 5 .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ f au.a g _a Efihrent 1M1= BOD > 30 <_ 220 nrgrC bsarr-~S >3u c ~ au nrgr~. ' GIIIM~IN Ar- ~ wv ~ vv ...b.......~ . __ _ -' ---o - CST Name (Please Prirrt) S e -~ CST Number >4 ~ ke ~ ; _ ~ 2533x9 Address a Evaluation Conducted ~ Telephone Number 2113 STS ~~-- SvmerSe-I` i,~,il ~Z5 ~-~j~b3 ~~15~~1~C~^^p2~`~..N,.. • ~ , ~- CS~ ~ ,, > v ~~ 3 •~• ~ # Page ~ of Property Owner '~l t ,~ (~ reel ID U ~~ ~ o Boring # ^ eortng Grotrtd ft, sttrfaoe elev. (p ~ , ~d peplh tD rmrfittg tailor o~ in. Sai Ra' llorizort Depth Pit pomptat-t Color Redox Oestxiptiott Textwe Structure Cortsistertce Boundary Roots GPO 'Eff#2 in. MratseN Qu- Sz. Cunt Color' S i 1 Gr. Sz Sh. 2 l~ mfr c ~ l ~ , 5 - ~' I ~. ~ l~ ~ 3 5 -~ 2 5- lb yl3 S~1 2m5b ~ r ~s - ~ ~ ~ U Boring ^ Bo~9 # tt. Depth ~ limiting facbr Groundstnface elev. in. ^ Pit Horizon Depth pominant Cobr Redox Description Textrme Shudu-e CortsiMence Boundary Roots Gr. Sz Sh. in. MunseG Qu. Sz. Corti Cobr ~ Rate GPDAP ~fi#1 ~t~2 U Boling Boring # Ground surface elev. R Deptlt to Grtuting fac0or in. ^ Pit Soi ~ Rate Fior¢on Depth Domin~tt Color Redtnt DescriptlDn Tetrttrre Structure Cons~r+oe Boundary Roots GPDfif' in. Mansell art. Sz. Cant Cobr Gr. Sz Sh. •Et~1 'Ett#2 Efiluertt ik1 = BODS> 30 < 220 mg(L and TSS >30 <_ 150 mglL ` Eftktent #2 = BODS <_ 30 mglL and TSS <_ 30 mg1L The Department of Commerce is tin equal opportunity service provider and employer. tf you need assistance to access services or neat material is an altercate format, Please contact the department at 608 266-3151 or TTY 60&264-8777. SBD•83301R.07/OQ) ,- ~A ~ PAGE~OF~ ~~~ NAME: -2 SLOT#~ I , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~~~I/4 JUtJI/4,S 7 T~9,N,R,19 E(or~V SCALE: I "= Q ` m\ NATION: ~ DSO' d ~ G BM I DESCRIPTION: ~o~ ~~ _~ ~ '~ n~ (~Pn-F--~~ ~~ BM 2 ELEVATION: BM 2 DESCRIPTION: -~'~ SYSTEM ELEVATION: ~V P I ~3 ~ a~ nt ,~1 c~,(~ j CJI • c~ ~jc.,r < f l~ d• o d SYSTEM TYPE: ..-- - C .., ~ ~ ., z ~,..0 --. ~r ~j VJ ~ '~ V~'~~d~~~ ! ~ ! 3-U~ ~fU~~~~~ 5 ~ o,~ },~r'`~ ~' l ~` i pi c0 _.~q ~ e~ ~~ ~ ~ i~a'~ ~ /S r ~`~ ~_ ~/ ~° s , o~ ~ ~,~ ~~ 2 ~ ~~~r o~ ~~ t ~3 ~~, ~ ~~~ `gyp ~ B_~ Iq ,-~ ~~ ~~ ,' I off- l~~-, ~. ~ ~ ~~~ ~ _ ,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ;, ;, r~ ~~ yy _ ~; ~~ ~_ I~ ~~ , ~, C~4~.4-; ~o SIGNATURE: ' - ~ DATE: ~ ~ ~0 - ~ 3 HfrC~~ ~~ gip. v ~• O c^ / M ti ~~ , . 00.OV, oO. Zpf` l / tp ~ , ~ ,,~ V r / ~ .6e•ZOE ~ ~ ~ e .rye o / i / ~ ~~ =N ~ ~ .~ r~N ~~ O - ~ ~ ~- . ~ o .; ~ N k ~N~ Z . ~- N \ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ i N ~~ ~ /{-V • tSt ti0 5 ~ ' o M,td96 ZEti ~ 3.t~ ~ Z~tO N o0.2£~ N ~d•ti5 •e9•Zp~ ~ /r 1 88 0 L, \ ~\~ ~, ~1 0 ~-'~ °o O~ ` ~ c-. to ~ mss, ~ ~c a t'\ u ~~ w a ~ ° sw ~ $ ~, 09 SO 5 r_•. ~ ,~ M.~d 'SZ ~ t \ +~ \ t m ~°. ~ ~ ~O ,/ C ~ ~ ` ~ ~\ ~` , . ~ 1ij .yZ .gyp s 0 , M•~"B6'aE~ \ . ~. ~ ~~ ~ o ;` ~` ~ ~ ~t+ ~ `0 5 ~ . ~ ~,`d9G, ZES ,, '~i _ S1 0 ` . ST CROIX COUNTY SEPTIC TANK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION FORM Owner/Buyer ~ T:: io~_ ~S~ ~ ~ ~ Mailing Address 3.~5` ~~~ ~e t1-~ob ~ Ov ~aG~~..~ ~~ 3YD16' Property Address ~~~ .~.-e ~ s ~do ~~ (Verification required from Planning Department for new construction) City/State IIEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel Identification Number ®o~C~ " jj ~4 ` ~~'~l • j06 3 Property Location .sue ~/., ~ '/a, Sec. _~, T~ $ N-R /~' W, Town of ~.~ ~~ ~ Subdivision ~~u~l~a~ ~s ~" ,Lot #~f a ~~ Certified Survey Map # ,Volume ,Page # Warranty Deed # _ ~ld ~ ~ '7 ,Volume ~ ~~ ,Page # -~~ ~ Spec house O yes I~. no Lot` lines identifiable D yes, no SYSTEM MAINTENANCE Improper use and maintenance of your septic system could result in its premature failure to handle wastes. Proper maintenance consists of pumping out the septic tank every three years or sooner, if needed by a licensed pumper. What you put into the system can affect the function of the septic tank as a treatment stage in the waste disposal system. The property owner agrees to submit to St. Croix Zoning Department a certification form, signed by the owner and by a master plumber, journeyman plumber, restrictedplumbcr or a licensed pumper verifying that (1) the on-site wastewater disposal system is in proper operating condition and/or {2) after inspection and pumping (if necessary), the septic tank is less than 1/3 full of sludge. Uwe, the undersigned have read the above requirements and agree to maintain the private sewage disposal system with the standards set forth, herein, as set by the Department of Commerce and the Department of Natural Resources, State of Wisconsin. Cert~eation stating that your septic system has been maintained must be completed and returned to the St. Croix County Zoning Office within 30 day of the three year expiration date. is ~ ~ ~a3 SIGNATURE OF APPLICA DATE OWNER CERTIFICATION I (we) certify that all statements on this form are true to the best of my {our) knowledge. 1 (we) am (are) the owner(s) of the property described above, by virtue of a warranty deed recorded in Register of Deeds Office. SIGNATURE OF APPLICAN' ~~ /~ DATE ****** Any information that is mis-represented may result in the sanitary permit being revoked by the Zoning Department. ****** ** Include with this application: a stamped warranty deed tiom the Register of Deeds office a copy of the certified survey map if reference is made in the warranty deed .~ ' . ~•. ' ~ POWTS OWNER'S MANUAL & MANAGEMENT Pi.AN FILE lNFdRMATlQN SYSTEM +3PEC(FICATldN3 ~ _ __ l+~allriiN PARAMETERS Number of Bedrooms ~ d NA Number of Public Facility Units A Estimated flow (svsrage} ~ i d a a f Design flow ipeaki, (Estimated x 1.5) ~~ Q al/da Sea APpgcatbn Rate Standard lntlwndEffk~ent Ctualaty altda fft~ Monthly averages Fats, Oil ~ Grease IFOG) S3O rngil 6iochefylieal Oxygen Demand 18ODs} 5.220 mg/L ^ NA Total Suspended SoNda tTSSI 5160 mgJL Pretreated Effluent Quality Monthly avar~ ag Biochemical Oxygen Demand ($ODsI s<30 mg/L Tote! Suspended Solids (T55i 530 mg/L ^ NA Fecal Coliform ipeometric mean) S10• cfui100m1 Maximum Effluent Partiafe 8izs Kin dfa. DNA Other: D NA `Values typical for domestic wastewater and septic tank effkient. MaaT>:NNAnIC~ sc~au~ Z Page cr 5sptfc Tank Capacity ~ CJ al DNA Septic tank Manufacturer p NA ~ EffAeent Filter Manufacturer ~ ~ ,~ p Nq Effluent Filter Model rJ~f' d NA Pump Tank CaPachy Q' al RNA Pump TaniC Manufacturer ~E' Si ^ NA r . v Pumn Manufacturer ~,~,4~ ~ ~ Pump Model ~ O NA Pretreatment Urit DNA Q SandJGravel Fllter ^ Peat Filter O Mechanical Aeratbn ^ Wetland ® Dishfsction ^ Other; Disparaal Cents) O NA O ln-Ground {gravity) ^ En-G-oufnd (pressurized) D At-Grade O Mound d Drip-Line O Other: Ot1-er: O NA Other: Q NA ~ ' ONAI SaMoi- Everrt >service Frequency lnspset eondh"ron of rankle? At least once every: 3 sl s lNlaxlmum S yeare) ^ NA Pf~rnp out corrtenta of tankta) When combined akldge and scum equals ana-third tY$1 of tank valuftle ^ NA Jnspect dispersal celi(a1 At least once every: ft~thtal tMaxitfsllm 3 yearsf .~ sartr) ^ NA Clean effluent f At least once every: ~ mort s)!ef DNA Irepect pump. pump controls 1D alarm At least once every: 0 e~~ lsl i7 NA Flush laterals end pressure test At 4eaet once every: .- ^ ts! s) DNA Other. At least once every: D manthts! r.- ^ earls) ^ NA Other: a NA MalNS~IANCE rN8TRUCnwNs inspections of tanks and dispersal calla shall be made by an individual canyiny one of the following iieenses or oertlficaNons: Master Plumber; Master Plumber Restrfctsd Sewer; POWTS inspector; POWT5 Maintainer; Septage Servicing Operator. Tank inspections must include a visual inspection of the tankis) to identify any missing or broken hardware, identify any creaks or leaks, measure ihs volume of combined sludge and scum and to check for any back up or pending of effluent on the ground surface. The dispersal celltal shall be visually inspected to check the effluent levels in the observation pipes and to check for any pending of effluent on the ground surface. The pondmg of efflueri on the ground surface may Mdicate a failing condition and requires the innmediaate notification of the local regulatory authority. When the combined accumulation of sludge and scum in any tank equals one•thiM Sy3) or more of the tank volume, the entire contorts of the tank shall be removed by a Septage Servicing Operator and disposed of fr accordarca with chapter NR 113, Wisconsin Administrative Code. All other services, including but not limited to the servicing of effluent filters, mechatticai or pressurized gomponents, pretreatment units, and any servicing at intervals of 512 months, shall be performed by s certff'~sd POWTi3 Maintainer. A service tepart shat) be provided to the local regulatory authority within 10 days of completion of any servks event. •apaa ®nfl9Jis(u(u,py uniuooslM '!£i 9 lZl '11148'£8 Dua it39tPD! tllgliZ(ZL'B8 wwo~ ,eidx4o y3!~ sauelld~-,oo u! P~laP qnn iueWnaoP a!41 ry J NGg- ~SIO~7 ' ~ owey ~N A,LI~IOFllfit/ AY0111'IR031f 1V~Ql la9dWfldl dOlVbShc1 aNlDIAl9S 3Dtif1dSS auodd away z~~NlvlNrow s,l.nr+od .~ a ,...> ra•'I%,' away s~3'171/lsN! 81MOd 81NSWWQ91VN0llitlQ~t 'J'1618$OdWI NO l~h~lddl0 3s AVW KNVI d d0 a01!lS1P1) SHl W011d NO$!!Jd ~! d0 Hfi~S~l 'llflsSl;! AVW H1V90 °s38NV1SWf1~!!19 ANV !l$QNR ?lNtll 1NiWlt-3al 3I~H10 !!O dWl1d ";~lld3$ d !~.l.iU3 lON 00 'N301~X0 1N3i~ld3flSNI #3QIONS! S3SSY311tH,L~i Ni~1--1NOa AtPW S?IN~I 1,N~W1V3lIl t19H10 ONV dWfld '~lld$S ~ ~DNINdVM> > °ewfi 1ey31e ;an33e uc selnJ eyi y3jn~ ~IidWOO ianw swslsds yons }o Quot;oniisuoae>r} •soe}J11a anlleJill}w ayi ~ iewoiq ayi ~a lenowst EulMOgo~ aosld ui peionJisuoa@J @q Agw sw@1s~s uoi3dJOage llos epei8.is pus punofry p a ~N sits p ^ ~Ue; I 'SJ.MOd Asl+e} sy1 soefdaJ oa asose~ tae! a se psllels~ eq ,tew ~ue1 8u!pfoy a ,ldolouyaei StMOd u! saauenpe 6ulJJeg °auof1e11w~1 floe x~/pue ~foegies o1 9np afgeil8ne 1ou st eeJe iuewaaefdaa afgellns d 17 •ewii 1ey3 3e ioaNa ui sslnJ eyi y3iM Aldutoa isnw swa;sRs luaweaslde>j °eeJa luewsaeldaJ olgelins a ysilgsise o; uailen~no ails pue iias Meu s Jo} peso ay1 u} 3~nse,, !I!nn eeJe iusu,9osido.- ayi ioaloJd o1 aJnflad •sliaM pue sour) 1oi 'aJnionJls pesodaJd pue Oullslxe woJ; ssfaegl®s pg.~nbeJ ,cq uodn pa8uu}ul eq 1ou pinoys pue uoiiaedwoa pue eouegJnislp woJ; pelaa3ad eq plnays seas iuauJeoeldaJ oc{,r~ •uraia~ls ualld,osge llos iueuJeaeidaJ a }o uoct¢ooi ay1 Jo{ P82lll3n aq Itew pue paienlsna uasq sgy sass 1t,wwaoafdei 9igeiine y j? :wa3ssls luaweoeldeJ iueiidwoo apoo a aplna,-d o1 'ua~lei eq 1snuJ•JO 'ueaq envy s9Jnseew Sulnao>lo; ayi peJiedeJ aq louuea pue alts) S.LMOd ayi N NK'td JI~NSONIINQ~ •lelJaiew pllos Usul .,aylous ,,o lene~D '13~ yilM pall} eaeds plop 8y3 pue panouJ9J sJenoo Jisy3 ~o panouasJ pus pslpnsaxa sq iieys slid pus s~fuel Ile '6uldwnd ~s~d • JoieJedp Bula:rusg aBsidag a ,tq }o pasvdscp• ~lJado,d .pue penauJaJ eq !lays sill pue s~fuel lie }o a3ue3uoo ey j pales s6uluado wild peuopusge eyi pue p93aeuua5sap 9q pays 83rd pue s~ue3 03 Buidld pd a :epos enilg.nsluiwPV ~uo~!M '£E'£8 cuwo~ Jaideya y3iM eoueiidwoa ul pauopuege ~ie~ss pue ~(lJSdoJd sl waists sy3 ieyl sJnsui o3 u9aiel oq ileys sdsls BwMOpo~ ey1 eolnJ9s {a ins us~fe3 ~ilu®uswJad si Jo~pue sfle3 S1MQd ayi uayM 1N~WNOONV9t/ 'sulJq Jeue1}OS JaleM pug :SUOdWel :sul,ldeu lueiluES :saplnlised :aiQilyOJd Dulwled :(lo :suoliealpew :adeJOS leew :asplalgJay :eseeJB :sullaseQ :s6ulfsed elge}aBen pue ilnJl :.t91eM idwnd du.,na) uleJp ual3~tpuno} :iB; :slue;oa{ufslp :sJedelp :ssol{ felusp :aJessaJBap ;9genna uoiioo :swopuoa :axing eila~JeBla :sstl(nn Ageq :s3i3olgflue :S1MOd eui #a a!!! ayi Buola,d pue eauewrousd ayi enoJduJr ~teu, wealis Jaiennsiseasn 9ti3 woJ} DulMOllo{ ayi }o uollaulu+ifa Jo uolianpoa '8916 u011dlasge lWa9 epeJD-Ie Jfl punouJ /~Ue }0 sdafs UMOp 189} S! tay3iM a9Je eyi 'iogdu,aa Ja gJnlsip esln~+JSyio Ja 'iano ifJed Ja enlJp iou oQ •sllea lesJedsip pus s:luei Jeno aelolt{en ,l,nPd Ja 9nup 1pu oQ ' •~fuei duund eyi ui4;inn sien@i fewJOU eJO1teJ of sloJiuoa duJnd ayi 9uile,redo ~tlienusw ul islsse o1 JsuleiwafN 31MOd Jo Jagwnld $ 3aeiuoa Jo duJnd loan!}{$ ayi o1 Jav-ad BulJO19eJ of JolJd JaieJedy~ 6ulalnre$ eBeldog a Aq QenOU,aJ ~uei dutnd 9y1 ;a SSu8iC1a0 syx envy u011enxls 9!111 pIQAa Oj 'luenly0 ~o abJeyoslp aoe~na Jo dnafaeq eyi ul x(nseJ Aew pus {s}((so eyi dulp~ao(xeno •esop aOJe( suo of Ish!®a lesJSdslP ay# of psBJeyaslp aq }l!M Ja7aM91aeM aBBaXe 91{3 p9Ja3Se., 8} J9MOd u@y/H •s(enef Jaie,enyBly fewJOU snoge !I!} Aew sxfuex dwnd saBelno Je,u-od BulJn£l •9oe{ans enllgnll;ul s43 ie usxoJl, OJe sualllpuoa floe usynn Jnaao iou !lays do Lexs uJelaAg '9sn Ol lo(Jd Jo1BJ9d0 DuloiN96 eAB1deS a Aq panaweJ lal~uvi atli }O ~l~siuoa eyi envy iae10@1ep oJe suollenueauoa yDiy }f •ls}lfea fesJedsip ey1 aeewap Jo~pue sseooJd 1uew1eeJ1 eyi epedwl Aew !eyi efeolwsya Jayio Ja s3onpoJo 9ulluied }0 9au9ssJd eye Joi {sl:luei JuewiesJi ~lasya S1MOd eWi }o esn o1 ~alJd 'uolion.rtsuoa Mau Jod HIOl1V~l3d0 t]l11V dil 13ib-18 Z ,o~ e8ed _' ~~ ~OGUM[NY NO. ~10~Z? wv ~p w o~-wtscoNU~ roa>K s-nw ._..__. ---=! = f B, s ~~. Developsont Ync..t.. . a•,ieTiscoii=in_ corRorii~ioiit..........-.._ ...............~'~=ui~or~... eonrsys sad warrants tw ..S~4'Vpr~ •Cr s ~Ashle_St~iY)f~ .................»... ,. A~ l li o T_vrn SQhlnv ae nn.0 9., Ji m~ f® na Tl~a [/MCt wa[all[~ NA rCMlwi MTe ~~~ ~R ~~ W{4r ~~. for Rtioord ~- nth Aril p` 19 86 .. .....................................».................................................................... ~ Ile~uww re 'Ta'AE/l~ ~.. +. in::coii~~~ex?~~~Q~..ct~E..$..~~A.?.QR.,.Q4 ................:.................... ~~ - ._.. _~-- =---_=-• ,i tM followia~ tlueribed seal astaM V'~7JIQ.l.11~..~. 1,..,~tw.Q1RiX~Oxulty, slat. of W;seosain: Tas Pasasi Nis .»_ ~, Part of the S~ of NW~C of Section 7, T29N, R19W, more fuI de ri follows: Lots 91 92 an 93 --------=-----~of the Plat of Ed ewood Estates III,.` ' reco arch 2 , 1986, in Vol. 5 of Plats, Page _9, Doc. 65. , TOGETHER WITH and 30BJECT '1'O the Protective Covenants recorded Sept. 4, ~' 1984 at 11:00 a.m., in Vol. 695, Fages' 529-531, Doc.~~396044, and the , Amendments To Protective Covenants recorded Sept. 28, 1984 at 8s30 a.m., !; in Vol. 697, Pages 166-172, Doc. X396609, which provide, among other ' things, that the aforesaid Lots are being conveyed as a combination containing at least 43,560 square feet, and that the individual Lots or ~' parts thereof may not be separately conveyed or mortgaged until all of ;: the aforesaid Lots are connected to municipal sanitary sewer and crater '- facilities. Until such connection, said combination of Lots shall be '~ owned and used only as a single unified parcel for one single family home,~~ and appurtenant buildings as described in said Covenants. Ownership of any of said Lots automatically entails membership in, and the resulting , rights and obligations of, Edgewood Estates Homeowners Association, Inc., as described in said Covenants. This .__..,>S.B_.~Clf?~........ homestead ysroperty. TOGETHER WITH and SUBJECT TO soy and all ~' easements, covenant, reservations and i restrictions of record. All recorded documents referred to herein being in the Office of the ~' Register of Deeds for St. Croix County, t~isconsin. Ij Dated this 11th ... day ot .........~P.~~4';~,..• .................. B. & H Develo m//e~~et, Inc.. a oorporation~ Donald E. B ornstad President ~~,_~SF~ Ands.~l~~GP..~ ../.....(SEAL) ~~ .William C. Harwell, Secretar} . ~`_~ ~ 1! ~; ~; A(IHNOWL>•DGlts>!rT jl STATE 0>T WISCONSIN ~~ ~a. ,; 3T. •. CROIX,--,,,•---.•,_...County. ... . Personally casno before Isst thL•..11~ _---day of Apr--1--„.._-___..... 1986. tbs aboTa ssamed W1LllAM J. GILBERY ----••••-•=-•-•- Notary Pubfic Donald E. Bjornstadl_-I;resident,,•.ar>_d.yVil]_{gn C. State of Wisconsin Zll..l__~f .~!_. ~.H• Developlttertt, Y/.~., My Commission is Permaneal~ me _la>o~ ~ ~ Such officers of said oorporatian... .....--• ........................................ .... !o ms knows to bs the persott $.......... who tsseutad the f z:. its . iasirl::aent a:ad a^ w e the nss c ; ts'ae THIS INfTRUM[NT WAS ORART[O aY ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~''O°'~ra~ ~ 8 ~ l • ~4illiatt J. Gilbert, Atty. •-• ~%l.<-•iu=~!'c•. _. ..................... . ~. 11Q..?.nd~.St~.Hudsan..~Q~~ .....................•- •...~i.~.~t~w!..........._~~ /`cr t"..._._............... ` Notary Public .......................... .County, Wis. „ (Signatures may bs anWeutieated or acknowledged. Both NY Commission is permanent. ( '' are not necessary.) deser- ............... 1>t.._.....J Strategies for loams If the soil texture of the fill con- sists of sandy loam to loam, there are several strategies you can use. First, follow the KISS principle on any fill soil. That is, keep the sys- tem as shallow as possible. The soil surface, even on fill, is subject to more freezing/thawing and wet- ting/drying cycles, which will pro- mote establishment of soil pores that can conduct water. Here, the best strategy is to chisel plow the surface when dry, establish vegetation, and leave the area undisturbed for as long as pos- sible before beginning consttuc- tion. Of course, often the developer of the property needs the system now, so it is usually not possible to leave it for more than a season without relocating the system. After preparing the surface, the method for applying effluent to the fill soils should be to spread it out or disperse it as much as possible. This means using pressure distribu- tion: amound, an at-grade system, or drip irrigation. Use any means available to control the distribution and to use as much of the area as feasible for dispersal. For finer-textured soils such as clay foams and sandy clay foams, all the same approaches apply, except that a deeper ripping or plowing of the surface is desirable. Again, this is to promote establishment of as many soil pores and pathways as possible to improve infiltration. 5pecialcases One special situation to be aware of is where the fill has been placed to fill in a depression or drainage way in order to provide a more level site for construction. Recognize that if the imported material has filled in a depression, and if there is a high water table near the surface in the depression, the water will rise within the fill and become level with the water table in the higher areas around the depression. In other words, placing the fill may not provide all of the separa- tion from the water table that you expect. Then you not only are deal- ing with reduced infiltration capac- ity in the fill material -you also have a saturated condition that will further reduce the capacity of the soil to accept and treat the tank effluent. It is very difficult to determine where the surface of the water table will be in fill material. It is often not possible to use soil coloration char- acteristics as an indicator, as would do in natural soils. The of the material will reflect the tion that the fill was removed and not conditions in the pr location. Also, recognize that if the placed in the drainage way, ~ will still seek to run from the rounding landscape through area. So during wet seasons, system installed in that loc, will be subject to large amoun additional water. We often hear it said that all the technology choices avai today, we should be able to loc system to provide treatment ali anywhere. But no matter how ~ the technology, if it is placed location that will be subject to odic inundation, the treatmen are looking for will not take ply If you take on a job that se to involve using fill soils, remer first to see if the fill soils cal avoided. If not, approach de and installation very carefully, try to build in as much additi capacity as possible. ^ ~F~~v-r c~ouN~ for sealed electrical panels i May 2009 ONSITE INSTALLER o control effluent. e get many questions and have discussions as we go around the coun- try about fill soils and what can be done about them. If you follow this column or have taken one of our workshops, you know the first answer is to avoid or prevent situations where you install into fill soils. We always talk about our guid- ing principles, one of which is KINN: Keep It Natural, N (where you fill in the last "N"). However, that leaves open the ques- tion, what do I do? Before speaking directly to that question, let us just say that in the 50-odd years of experience between us, the times we have been in the worst situations as designers and site evaluators are on fill sites. There Killing structure When you move any textured soil other than sand, the soil sttuc- ture is destroyed. That liberates the silts and clays to migrate when water is added. The loss of pore space from destruction of the structure and the clay migration results in a loss of infiltration capacity. When this happens, it is difficult if not impossible to pre- dict the long-term acceptance rate for soil. This means that in general you will want to build in as many safety factors as possible when you esti- mate the expected daily flow and the soil-sizing factors. The result will and should be a much larger system on average than would typi- cally be designed. If you take on a job that seems to involve using fill soils, remem- ber first to see if the fill soils can be avoided. If not, approach design and installation very carefully, and try to build in as much additional capacity as possible. was one system in particular where we designed a mound on a fill site. To make a long and painful story short, despite aII of our best design ideas, the system failed miserably within six months of startup. So when we suggest avoiding fill soils, we are very serious in our advice. If you are on a site that requires fill to provide adequate separation distance for treatment purposes, or to raise the system above grade because of floodplain or other setback requirements, you should require that the fill be sand. The sand should consist of a variety of soil-treatment capacity sand-size separates. That is, it should be a combination of fine, medium and coarse sand particles. Ideally there should be no more than 5 percent by volume silt and clay size particles. It should not be all coarse sand or all fine sands. With coarse sand, you may not get the desired treatment in that medi- um before your limit With fine sands, it predict how they will tank effluent (this i~ fine sand soils in na A pressure distribu should be used to effluent as uniforml over the area. S ~ ON51TE INSTALLER May 2009 LGQllll~ W ll.ll Fi115oi1s _ -tom ~~ • ~ .,~ ~~ Form-STC-104 1 AS BUILT SANITARY SYSTEM REPORT OWNER ~ ~e ~' "~ <', ~ -~ TOWNSHIP ~x.~J~,,~i SEC. ~ T ~N-R~W ADDRESS (/j ~ ~~~ ~ ~n~ . ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN ~~ ~ ~~ yc 9lvl0 ~j ~Q ~ 7 ~C `7 G _ ___ SUBDIVISION ~~.,v /,1~;,~~ LOT ~~-1- ~~~""93LOT SIZE ~ PLAN VIEW Distances and dimensions to meet requirements of hl.I~R 83 SHOW EVERYTHING WITHIN 100 FEET OF SYSTEM _.""1 ~ a `~° (~~' _ _~„; ~'~ ~~ ~~I ~~~ ,~ ~~...,- ~~: , ~. INDICATE NORTH ARROW BENCHMARK: Describe the vertical reference point used s~-~- ~-.,c ~~,~ Elevation of vertical reference point: ldG'G " Proposed slope at site: ~ - ~d ~r,-era-. FUMP CHAMBER Manufacturer: Liquid Capacity: Pump Model: Pump/Siphon Manufacturer: Elevation of inlet: Pump Size Bottom of tank elevation: Pump off switch elevation: Gallons per cycle: Alarm Manufacturer: Alarm Switch Type: Number of feet from nearest property line: Front, O Side, O Rear, Ft. Number of feet from well: Number of feet from building: (Include distances on plot plan). SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM Bed : .____~ Trench: Width: ~ ~ ~ Len~th:~i ~ Number of Lines: Area Built:~~d Fi11 depth to top of pipe: ~,~ ~' Number of feet from nearest property line: Front, O Side, Rear,O Ft.~^ Number of feet from well: J~fr ~ Number of feet from building: a_C ` (Include distances on plot plan). SEEPAGE PIT Size: Number of pits: Diameter: Liquid depth: Bottom of seepage pit elevation: Area Built: Has either a drop box O or distribution box O been used on any of the above soil absorbtion sytems?~ (Check one). ..HOLDING TALK Manufacturer: Capacity: Number of rings used: Elevation of bottom of tank: Elevation of inlet: Number of feet from nearest property line: Front, O Side, Rear, OFt. Number of feet from well: Number of feet from building: Number of .feet from nearest road: Alarm Manufacturer: DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, INSPECTION REPORT FOR SAFETY & BUILDINGS LABOR & HUMAN RELATIONS ~ PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEMS DIVISION P,O. dOiC 7'JBtJ BUREAU OF PLUMBING MADISON, Ikll 53707 ' L~CONVENTIONAL ^ALTERNATIVE 9tetePlanLD.Number ^ Holding Tank ^ In-Ground Pressure ^ Mound (Ii es8i9net71 NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER: T ADDRESS OF PERMIT HOLDER ~ INSPECTION DATE: B& H Development WI 54016 Hudson 836 St. Croix St. N. ~-js-- ~'~ ~; ~y , , BENCH MAR (-Pgrmanent reference point) DESCRI DIFFE NT FROM PLAN. REF. PT. ELEV.: CST REF. PT. ELEV. SE Section 7,T29N-R19W, Twn.of Hudson, Lots91-92, Edgewood Est. I I Name of Plumber: MP/MPRSW No.. Cnuwy Sanitary Permit Number: William Schumaker 6382 St. Croix 83788 ' SEPTIC TANK/HOLDING TANK: MANUF ACTURER. UOUID CAPACITY. TANK INLET Ev. T~k nun FtF1EV. WARNING LABEL LOCKING COVER ~ i ' ~ P OV ED: PROVIDED. ~ /,:` " ' I .` ~ J L YES ^NO ^YES NO BEDDING: WENT A VENT MATT HIGH WATER NUMBER OF ROAD: ~ PROPERT Y WELL. BUILDING-. VENT TO FRESH ^ ^ G!, ` ALARM ^ FEET FROM LINE. ) ~ ` ~ AIR INLET: ~ "r YES NO YES NO NEAREST . / _-• ~ (~ ~ DOSING CHAMBER: " ~~ MANUFACTURER BEDDING. UOUID CnPnCITV II Pll M L PUMP'SIPHON MANUE nC1UR61; WARNING LABEL LOCKING COV ER PROVIDED. PROVIDED: ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO GALLONS PER CYCLE: P P CON ROLSOPERATIONAL NUMBER OF PROPERT Y WELL BUILDING VENT TO FRESH (DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FEET FROM LINE AIR INLET: PUMP ON AND OFF) ^YES ^NO NEAREST-~ SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM. Check the soil moisture at the depth of plowing E N+,TH uInME TE H a1ArEHIAE AND MARKING or excavation. Ilf soil can be rolled into a wire, construction shall cease until FORCE the soil is dry enough to continue.) MAIN Clllel\/CIU TI AI81A1 CVSTFM• BED/TRENCH DIMENSIONS WIDTH / - LENGTH - t0 ~ ~ NO. OF TRENCHES - - UISTR PIPE SPn(:I N+~ ; _F:. COVER k1ATEHIAL ~ ~ PIT INSIUE Dln ~pITS LIQUID DEPTH. GRAVEL ^EPiH F LDE TH UISTH PIPF DIS7R PIPE DISTP PJD NO DS H NUMBER OF PROPE RTV WELL BUILDING. VENT TO FRESH BELOW PIP S "~ l COVER BOVE !" ELE V.INLf1 ELE V. ENU, - ie ,'! ~'~ `l, Ih'7 ~ '~ 2-`'l" ~ PIPE ~--- i FEET FROM NEAREST » LINE,' J y 7~1 ~~ 7 ~4 AIR.LNLET. f L_~. -~ MOUND SYSTEM: Mound site plowed perpendicular to slope Check the texture of the fill material for PROVIDE ADIAGRAMOFSYSTEM and furrows thrown upslope: mound systems to make certain that it ON REVERSE SIDE. SHOW ELEVA- meets the criteria for medium sand. TIONS MEASURED. ^YES ^NO SOIL COVER TEXTURE PFHMnNf NI MnHKF HS OI{$EH VATI(1N WELLS ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO DEPTH OVER TRENCH BED DEPTH OVFH TRENCH HE U UEPTH OF 7OP5<HL SnUUEp SEE UfD MULCHED CENTER EDGES ^YES. ^NO ^YES ^N ^YES ^NO PRESSURIZED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: WIOT H: LENGTH NO. OF LA7E HAL SPACING GRAVEL DEPTH HFL OW PIPE FILL DEPTH ABOVE COVER BED/TRENCH TRENCHES ~ DIMENSIONS MANIFOLD PUMP MANIFOLU DISTR. PIPE MANIFO LO MATERIAL NO UISTH UISTR. PIPE UISTHIBUTION PIPE MATERIAL $ M11ARKING ELEV.'. ELEV.' DIA ELEV. PIPES DIA ELEVATION AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION HOLE SIZE HOLE SPACING L'HILLEU CORRECTLY COVER MATERIAL VERTICAL LIFT CORRESPONDS TO APPROVED PLANS Z '1 ~ ~ ^YES ^NO ~ m l a` I .___---- ~~-•~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~5 ~,.- ^NO _ ^YES ^NO OBSERVATION WELLS. NUMBER OF PROPERTY W l: BUILDING: FEET FROM LINE`,` ^YES ^NO NEAREST ~~ / v~LIL ~~ ~~(r~'"- ~ p. ti's ((-~° l~. 3 ~ n '~ l 90,38 i~..zS ~~U' /?-2~ o ~ o, ,~ 12 Sketch system on Retain in county fi e for aud~t. ~ ~I ~2 O Reverse Side. _._-"---- --- =' ~C SIGNAT E: .- TITLE: ~ ' DILHR SBD 6710 IR. 01/82) -~ __.,r ~/// _ - __ i ~ SANITARY PERMIT APPLICATION cou Ty , ~ C~~LHF~ Code In accord with ILhtR 83 Wis Adm Q5 . . , . ~ .d.:r..,a.v ...,..,4.,,.0,. STATE SANITARY PERMIT # O -Attach complete plans (to the county copy only) for the system, on paper not less than STATE PLAN I.D. NUMBER 8% x 11 inches in size. -See reverse side for instructions for completing this application. PETITION ^ ^ i. APPLICANT INFORMATION -PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION. YES NO FOR VARIANCE PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY LOCATION ~a ,~'/4 ~, '/o, S T , N, R / E (o W PRO ER OWNER'S MAILING A DRESS LOT NUMBER BLOCK NUMBER SUBDIVISION NAME CITY, STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER CIT NEAR T ROAD, LAKE OR LANDMARK ~ ~ ~ -_ D VILLAGE : ~ II. TYPE OF BUILDING OR USE SERVED: /,2~~ (~Q "' l~~ -' Number of Bedrooms if 1 or 2 Family ~ OR ^ Public (Specify): III. PURP E OF APPLICATION: (Check only one in #1. Check # 2, 3 or 4, if applicable) I O S ~ p -~ 1. a. ~ New b. ^ Replacement c. ^ Replacement of d. ^ Reconnection of e. ^ Repair of an I! System System Septic Tank Only an Existing System Existing System 2. A Sanitary Permit was previously issued. Permit # 7ta~d Date Issued 2.~/12~_ Pr _ 3. An Existing System has been inspected and soil conditions meet minimum requirements. I 4. ^ The System is shared by more than one owner/building. Attach Common Ownership Agreement to County Copy. IV. TYPE OF SYSTEM: (Check only one in #1 and only one in #2) 1. a. Conventional b. ^ Alternative c. ^ Experimental 2. a. ^ System- b. ^ Holding c. ^ Pit Privy d. ^ Vault Privy e. ^ Mound f. ^ IGP In-Fill Tank V. ABSORPTION SYSTEM INFORMATION: (Check one} 1. a. See a e Bed b. ^ See a e Trench c. ^ See a e Pit 2. PERCOLATION RATE 3. ABSORPTION AREA 4. ABSORPTION AREA YSTEM ELEVAT 6. WATER SUPPLY: (Minutes per inch): REQUIRED (Square Feet): PROPOSED (Square Feet): ~ f~I private ^ Joint ^ Public eet VI. TANK CAPACITY in allons Total # of ' refab. Site C l S Fiber- Pl ti Exper. INFORMATION New xisting Gallons Tanks Manufacturer s Name Concrete on- tee glass as c App. Tanks Tanks structed Se tic Tank or Holdin Tank Q ,,..,c.~---~ Lift Pum Tank/Si hon Chamber VII. RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT I, the undersigned, assume responsibility for installation of the private sewage system show on the attached plans. Plumber's Name (Print): Plumber's Signature: (No Stamps) MP PRSW No.: er: Business Phone Nu m b ~( ' ~ / GGr r / / ~ [ OC Plumber's Address (Street, City, State, Zip Code): Name f Designer: a t ~ ' VIII. SOIL TEST INFORMATION ` Certified Soil Tester (CST) Name CST # C T's AD ESS (St eet, City, State, Zip Code) Phone Number: IX. COU TY/DEPARTMENT USE ONLY ^ Disapproved ^ Sanitary Permit Fee Groundwater Surcharge Fee ate Issuing Agent Signature (No Stamps) Approved Owner Given Initial / L Adverse Determination X. COMMENTS/REASONS FOR DISAPPROVAL: ~ .. SBD-6398 (formerly Plb-67) (R. 03/86) DISTRIBUTION: Original to County, One Copy To: Bureau of Plumbing, Owner, Plumber ~ • s l INFORMATION & INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING A SANITARY PERMIT APPLICATION " _° ' TO THE APPLICANT: 1. This sanitary permit is valid for two (2) years; 2. Your sanitary permit may be renewed before the expiration date, and at the time of renewal any new criteria in the Wisconsin Administrative Code will be applicable; 3. All revisions to this permit must be approved by the permit issuing authority. A new permit may be needed if there is a change in your building plans, system location, estimated wastewater flow (number of bed- rooms, etc.), depth of system, or type of system; 4. Changes in ownership or plumber requires a Sanitary Permit-TransferlRenewa": Form (SBD 6399) to be submitted to the county prior to installation; 5. Private sewage systems must be properly maintained. The septic tank(s) should be pumped by a licensed pumper_ uvhenever r~eces~aty,.u5ually ever~;2.to 3•jre'~rs; 6. if you have questions concerning your private sewagejsystem, contact your {ocal code administrator or the State of Wisconsin, Bureau of Plumbing, 608-266-3815. To be complete and accurate this sanitary permit application must include: I. Property owners name and mailing address. Provide the legal description where the system is to be installed; I . Type of building or use served: If public is checked, indicate type of use (~.e. 10 unit apartment, 30 seat restaurant, etc.). Fill in number of bedrooms if building is a one or two family dwelling; III. Purpose of application: Check only one in #1. Complete #2 if permit is for tank replacement, reconnection or repair; IV. Type of system: check all appropriate boxes depending on system type. Check experimental only if project is in conjunction with University of Wisconsin; V. Absorption system information: Provide all information requested in #1-6; VI. Tank information: Fill in the capacity of every new andlor existing tank, list the total gallons to be installed, number of tanks and manufacturer's name. Indicate prefab or site constructed and tank material. Complete for a//septic, Iiftlsiphon chamber and holding tanks for this system. Check experimental approval only if tanks received experimental product approval from DILHR; VII. Responsibility statement: Installing plumber is to fill in name, license number with appropriate prefix (e.g. MP, etc.}, address and phone number. Plumber, must sign application form. Fill in designer name if applicable; Vllt. Soil test information: Certified soil tester's name, certification number, address, and phone number. IX. CountylDepartment Use Only; X. Comment area for use by county or resaon given when application is disapproved. Complete plans and specifications not smaller than 8'h x 11 inches must be submitted to the county. The plans must include the following: A) plot plan, drawn to scale or with complete dimensions, location of holding tank(s), septic tank(s) or other treatment tanks; building sewers; wells; water mains/water service; streams and lakes; dosing or pumping chambers; distribution boxes; soil absorption systems; replacement system areas; and the location of the building served; B) horizontal and vertical elevation reference points; C) complete specifications for pumps and controls; dose volume; elevation differences; friction loss; pump performance curve; pump model and pump manufacturer; D) cross section of the soil absorption system if required by the county; E) soil test data on a 115 form. GROUNDWATER SURCHARGE On May 4, 1984, 1983, Wisconsin Act 410 was signed into law. This legislation is more commonly known as the groundwater protection law. This change in statutes was the ~ ^~~ result of over 2 years of steady negotiation and public debate. The groundwater bill Groundwater - ~'~~-~ included the creation of surcharges !'ees} for a number of regulated practices which Wiscorfsin's can effect groundwater. The surcharge took effect on July 1, 1984. All of the water that buried ~teasui'e ~ is used ire your building is returned t~ the groundwater through your soil absorption ~'o ` ~ system or the disposal site used t,y ~~;ur holding. tank pumper. ~ ~~ Tne monies ~;olie.rted througs~, thee: ~urcY~arge:s are credited to the groundwater fund adniinis ° ierec~ by tt~e ~~`epartment of f~{atur~,l n~1sotsrce:>. Theso funs are used for monitorir~:J ground- °~t~ v _„r_>.r; gr .~~r ;iwater contaminatio ~ irr_. estiga±+ons anc? est~+blishment of standards around•water, .__7 ____ ;'s evcrti? protecting. i ~ ~. ~,,~~ ~.:.~~!'' a ~:v a p' Tc~ ~ ,t3s ~ w~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ b ~o ~r:~ ~Y, ~~ ~3 ~~ ~l ~ h ~6 ~t~ ~, h ~~ 2 ~9 \ I l~ crv Q~ I3~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~.-- ~.t ~ ~~~' J /fi 0 ~ c c ~JGg T mot u -- ~~ ~~ ~~~ _ ~/ Y' an fQ ~ ~~ . ,~16 ~~ ° ~ ~ ~~ ~ l ~Y o~ ~ r3~' ~~ s *~ DEPAt3TMiENT Ut~ ~ 1 ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~:~~ SAFETY b 6UILD1 !Nq€1~ R t!, DlV454pN LA®V i :43sit9 ~ i ir~V ~ 1 ~i/ ~~~~ MADISON~,~WI 53707 HUMAN f~EI.A'fif.)i'd {tif53.418(4~ ~ Chap#er 1dai.t345E t. Ct_-.._...., t:k~t`~'~1:~ ~~-~~ ..y.--4, ..~. . ~' ?t1WNa14tP1MS~NlCfPAttTY: .: LK. 1~.: SUBOtVi8tON NAM ....._ COUNTY. A USE ~ DATE$ t~l6ERVATI0Pq MARL ' ~~rillResidence ~` ..............---°- JrVN~ L7Rep~ SUnt~ Z7 ~9Q6 ~UN~ .Z~, g~ ~o1c.3~OK AtaE' °-~ 5a,~s "adC~ -'Sd fuT//t41b ~,y,~2 - M4;4}~ RATING: ~ 8ite sutta((bt~~e for rystem! i,h^ j8~it`~~unw_ itet~trjfor rys(t'r`t~n ~ _._-_._...._ ON. ~ ~~ , Mt_.J ~. Y ~ LJ ~ Y lJ~ll ~ ~G 7 ~ ~ GOAfV~nl'rlOn._.,I J~,1 SL~t aoptl~ ,~(~ _ if t'ercotation Tarts are NOT required DE't~'N R'm`Tf`: if any paruon of the tested area is in the ~ndes^s.HG3.09t54tb1, indieate: -~ CLdSS ~. ~~ floodplain, inditafe Fioadptain aievation: N~~„` A~~-__ ~,~ , ~,,, PR0F!l.45 DE5CRIPTifJNS BORIMG ~OTAL A -1 CN A S It_ WI H THiCKN S, COLOR, TEXTURE, ANb DEPTH £R pY}{ ~ ELEVATION QB v TO BEDROCK IP OBt;ERVED tSEE ABBRV. ON BACK.) o-o.s 8t_c.-rs o.~-Z3 Lr$Rn15.L 2.3 3.3 62'I~t6+c ~ $C.+LTS cS.S 2.S Lr$RNS-t. Z•S-4.~`~~l 4.0-4,5 g. ~ Q".t(5 9`a.2's p ~?-g /o GY,+h 4 . -9, t wt ~ S rt6te ~' ee b B- ~ 7»7~ q~,~7 r `~' ?•7S o-t,o gLe.-rs ~,c~- 3.z5 $~N~ >~ s,t ~s 3.ZS-~ ~a g,R.,~-tftsSrG+t~ca# 7.~b-1.7S ROCS*6~, --- 0 5,~ t.o-2. o ~ ~ B- ~ /.;5 t 9 0 `r/l.~ _ ~%55~DS~cob 7- 6~$eNS~G~ 8 ~ ~ _ ~~,wt.$iitpg +~ ~tv-rt"ro ~•`°"' o Wt+p~ Gtaw ~ 7 • .33 ~t,c7S 'S•~3 -4.67 ~N I. - 7.6~= ILI, I. ~ 7 - d-O•z ~t_Tso.z-2•'Z BR.~SrL~cb6 S,t z•2-3.3'grV~cow, B- ~ / 0.9b ~7.0~ ~`/0,9C1 3.3'-7 M~AS~t6k~' #~'Sr' 7. -% ~~ ~ -~' '~ o n. ~ ..~.p~N~e uE•~cR1F'TronJ'S PERCOLATtANTESTS uV~'~' I , NUM~R DEPTH WATE AFTER IN H 4.E ELtlN TE TI INT RVAi.-MIN. RA MINU ES PER INGH p/ L~ _ ~ r I r r 26.7 ~_---° P. z ~!~~ tZ , _ / 2~ ~ [.u~ --- _ ~.,~. s k a ~~'~'`'`' n.-...nww. r., .. I .wus.u.raa+.. ......c .w.r.. ~...-.w-`r«.,-.. ..-........~.... -.~ .. ~r....., -.... >lOT PtAN: Shaw ivcaationa of percolation fasts :nntat and vertical elevation reference points end , ii ttorings and the dintsnsions o/ suitable sot! areas. Indicate scale or ow thtlir to non the plot plan. Show the surface elevetian at e-1 istanees. Dascrik-e what are thg fwri rings and the direction send iwrren, ni land slope. , L OT L 1 N~ j -~__.._.----'' ~d ' ~ f f 14~t SYSTEM EIEVA .: ~ ~ g • ~-S ~E ~ A Q~14rNA4ati gt~JAt.;~ ,I~USl' ~ ~~ , ~k1T 1 IN TO ASSU~t: , W dTL,Q 4N IC.t~ 7 gi'f /n~ v~~ ~ Q~ ! V ,f ~ ~ ~ 4 R~UN~1~ ~ W d. Y 'F-~O rh -CN ~ 'SY 5T ~• ~ /+~ . ' ~~ J - ,` 3 ~~~ i~ ,' ~; ~ ;, ~r~ ~r -,~, ~ a : ~ _ 3q ~ TLR.° ;y-~G~1 fit) :. i ~~DD ' p ~-t~BS ~ ~t~ 1CfC0~1Md-J~. a e F~ ~ ~ ~ ' : ~, r ~ ~ s~ -~ g ~ _ `~ °T c y o~Etes, xc mU e o r KT~ c Ac ~ ~ ~,~-~ ._ ~ SGATtbt~ of A • .. ~...-.--~- N ~ *svsr ~' ' az ,+~ StA L ~ ~ . ~ J 1 rb Cf.r455 2 TESTS. ~a1N AGC 5'~ a,~ j ~ ' CaT 9 3 ~ N '~. '~~.~4 ~ .U ~~Zf G$ ~ p~ lD Scott; - .. ~157te,,yCTt1 ~~' ' ,' , B- ' ~ : ,SLO B~8 .z ' - ° 2O' 4I-3 , ~ ~'N'a i ~ sysr~M ~ AITFeNgTC SySrG h N+~Siwo L'<.ev4Trr,r , _ ; ; :g-Z, , i'i4R/ TsCt~i' ~Q~~~ s E~EVdr,oN ~ ~1 .00' b~ ~ ~ ~, - ~. _zy ~ $~ § 2a, E $ ~ r " ~ ' ~-1~ Atua o+ rt4 ao' io ~ TY , [~ 1 ~. ~t t.a ~fv ~;`'w r ,~ ct' ' `~ i~f3e+s ~t-~u-l®~ oa u ' ~i ; I CAs ~ YSTE' , ~ - ~Yt - . sc~.r,yLARv $M --~re.t oN ~$~- ~~'~Ro~t P~P~' ~ 8~;sut~~ +-ro use tn~T' P~~~, ~J~S~ ~~N t~..i -L~a.~tL a.9>; •~Z'. `, E~-~.v~ct'r _ /~. ~ ~.. .~.. PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS BORING TOTAL U ATER-INCHE CHARAC ER F SOIL WITH HICKNESS, COLOR, TEXTURE, AND DEPTH NUMBER DEPTH IN, ELEVATION OBSERVED TO BEDROCK IF OBSERVED SEE ABBRV. ON BACK.) B- Z 9.8U os.4Z Y n(av<r ~' 9.8U a-o.S t~TS O.S-Z•3 LrI~~:NS~L Z.3-3.9 $eNSrtC~~R, 3.9-7.0 {~t~$Rn-S~6- 'cob 7.0-9•s $aN M es B- 3 // ?h rpp. n( >!I.2U ~-°'~ $`-'-TSO.t-i.s'cT$~2NS,r~ r.S•3.41B+~nt 5-L 3 4-7.Z'~e MS*G 7.2•/! 2 ~e M S ~catod5-r B~~ 7 9z ?7.9~ p-o,~'$C.LTs e,7S-4.r7 ~aS~L q.17-792 ~Qr,CS~tGk B- ~l) ,UO /6 .~ ~ 7.00 o-z.5~8~M L Zs-L.og $~aSL 6.oSc- .00$,~nl L}M B-~ ~ o //~./6 ~ 8.00 -r.17 $ts t i.r7-4 .o $aaSLq .0-7.0 $eNMS ~.0 8e-,,LS B- ,~~.... ;,~ ,~.. „Y ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING OFFICE 796-2239 {HAMMOND) 425-8363 (RIVER FALLS) HAMMOND, WI 54015 July 9, 1986 Carolyn Haag Bureau of Plumbing P. 0. Box 7969 Madison, WZ 53707 Dear Carolyn: ~,~^~ U~ O~ Permitl~75020, issued to B & H Development on 2-12-86 has been rescinded. Anew percolation test was required, as the system was lower than the original percolation test. Attached please find permit4~75020. Permit~683788, issued to B & H on July 9, 1985 replaces above. Should you have any questions regardint this, please contact this office. Sincerely, Mary ~nkins St. Croix County Zoning Office mj Attachment Leroy .iansky P.S.C: _ 13 E. Spr>;ICS:°w£tr~et Chippewa 1=ails, WI 54729 i 715) 723-8786 ~ ~ PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM INVES I ~.~ ,`, , ~ -; ~W~sconsin Department of Industry / - ,, . , Labor & Human Relations l;~' ~ ~ ~'~~~' Safety & Buildings Division ~c.%, ~ ~ ~!~ Bureau of Plumbing to ~,~ x~Tl~?~ ~ ~ tf.~ r ~ ~. / ~ ~ „~~~ Name of Premises LETS 4 t ~: q Z £acr"wnt)t~ ~STA'r~~" IlL s~ . ~,,,~, . ~ . a 9 ~ tow ~ n~,J sr. cRo IX Location Master Plumber/Soil Tester ~!~~~~ ~~a2.4~~~~~6a2vE~N4-~~ Addna Owner. S'TEV6e~l ~S~.4l.E~ Address ~'F--2- ~ g~to J,~t-~so.~+ uar. s40~~ Sanitary Permit # '1scz.o Plan I.D. No. a1@„ Type of Inspection sit>c Persons Present at Site ~+-~ N~;a N , r`3~-.. ~ ~ - w~3:37~ Type of Building: ^ Public Single Family er-0rplax ~~ BRIEF, FACTUAL COMMENTS AND SKETCH: o N l f7 t''- of Z >~ F- Z o ~, U Z ~Q my a d ' <t_ °~" E ~d w d C o / ~ ~ A ~ a C o f N C '~ o c ~ ._ > man ~' DoT .. n ~ ,~a ~ •~ m ~ E E ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~' c F-. N'~ H w 3c ~ E~`^ o m ~ Q O °a,v ~ ~ ,~~ H ~o W ~ ~' r~ Na`° v p 1 W N ~~ ~ R H 2 ° ° . .~ ,10,E ~ ° > d~ ~ Q N Z A ..v 'E ~ > d Nam ~ ~ a _~ ,;~ ° t ` ~ w H A nv > WE" ~ a E ~ Er o „~ 0 n~ >~ ~ ;? ' ~ rn s ~ a? m ~ ~ ~ 5 c oo ~ ..? ~> ~8, a D ~ .=~ ~ E ~ N '~'o d o ~ Y~ ~ E c~ d ~ ~ 1O E d ~ m W ~ c o,'~ v~E~ a ~ •~~ „~ m~ r` v~ aE ° E •~ ~~ ~' udi07 >o ~~aia rn` >w t'~° S ~m a`0 ' 'cENd o ~ 'c ~ 3u V a~ 6 ~' m ~~-'E iy c E ~L y._ 1O ~m ° m rm t~ r/03~ t'~ d"' La >„ > ~ c > - v d E o'a a o > u„ o d ~~ d o h ~~ . a z 0 a a ~ ~ ° m ~ o~,~- U ~ ~ U U ~ F. O m Y V W ~ ~ ~ ~ Q' ~ O p LL m O z a p z ~~ W w Z 0 w N Q .~ w Q Q O M~ W 0 W w w w z ~. W J G Z O J 2 !~ V z z 0 Q 0 w ~-- O 11.. • a~ w m ~> x w ~ O w z z c c; o~ U z c ~.. L z o~ C w z 0 r DEPAf'iTWIENT OF'INDUSTRY, INSPECTION REPORT FOR SAFETY & BUILDINGS LABOR ~ HUMAN RELATIONS PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEMS olvlslow P,O. BOX 7968 BUREAU OF PLUMBING MADISON, WI 53707 Xf~CONVENTIONAL ^ALTERNATIVE St ate Planl.D.Number. ^ Holding Tank ^ In-Ground Pressure ^ Mound Ilt assigned) . ~: f. ~ ~ NAME OF PERMIT HOLDER! ADDRESS OF PERMIT HOLDER. INSPECTION DATE'. B & H Development 836 St. Croix St., N. Hudson, WI BENCH MARK (Permanent reference point) DESCRIBE IF DIFFERENT FROM PLAN: REF. PT. ELEV.: CST REF. PL ELEV.- SE NW, Section 7, T29N-R19W, Town of .Hudson, Lots~~91-92,Edgewood Est. Name of Plumber. MP/MPRSW No.. Cnumy. Sanitary Permn Number: William Schumaker 6382 St. Croix 75020 SEPTIC TANK/HOLDING TANK: MANUFACTURER-. LIQUID CAPACITY. TANK INLET ELEV. TANK OU7LF.T ELEV.. WARNING LABEL LOCKING COVER PROVIDED. PROVIDED. ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO BEDDING: VENT DIR.: VENT MATT HIGH WATER NUMBER OF ROAD: PROPERTY WELL BUILDING. VENT TO FRESH ALARM FEET FROM LINE AIR INLET. ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO NEAREST DOSING CHAMBER: MANUEACI VHtH tltUUING: LIQUID CAPn(:ITV PUMP MOUEI. PUMP. SIPHON MANU1 n(:TUHEH WARNING LABEL LOCKING COVER PROVIDED. PROVIDED: ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO GALLONS PER CY CLE: PUMP AND CON TRO LS OPERATION AL NUMBER OF PROPERTY W[LL BUILDING VENT TO FRESH (DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FEET FROM _INE AIR INLET. PUMP ON AND OFF) ^YES ^NO NEAREST-~ SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM. Check the soil moisture at the depth of plowing _ I r Nc~TTf nInME rEH n1ATE RInE AND MAR KING or excavation. (lf soil can be rolled into a wire, construction shall cease until FORCf the soil is dry enough to continue.) MAIN C(1NVFNTIANAI SYS7EM~ WIDTH. LENGTH NO OF UISTR PIPE SPA(:INI~ COVER INSIUE Uln SPITS LIQUID BED/TRENCH TRENCHES MnTEHIAL PIT DEPTH. DIMENSIONS GR:IVEL DEPTtI FILL DEPTH UISTH PIPF pISTH PIPE DISTR PIPF. MATERIAL NO DIST l3 NUMBER OF PROPERTY WELL BUILDING. VENT TO FRESH BELOW PIPES ABOVE COVER E(EV INLf f ELEV ENU PIPES LINE AIR INLET: . FEET FROM NEAREST--- Mound site plowed perpendicular to slope Check the texture of the fill material for PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OFSYSTEM and furrows thrown upslope: mound systems to make certain that it ON REVERSE SIDE. SHOW ELEVA- meets the criteria for medium sand. TIONS MEASURED, ^YES ^NO SOIL COVER TE%TURE PE HM ANI NT MAHKF HS OBSEH VA TI(1N WELLS ^YES ^NO _^YES ^NO DEPTH OVER TRENCH 6ED DEPTH OVFH TRENCH BEU _ UE PTH OF TOPS(11L SOUOFU SEE UEU MULCHED CENTER EDGES ^YES. ^NO ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO PRESSURIZED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: WIOTH LENGTH NO. OF LATENAL SPACING GRAVEL UEPTH BELOW PIPE FILL DEPTH ABOVE COVER BED/TRENCH rRENCHEs DIMENSIONS MANIFOLD PUMP MANIF OLD DISTR PIPE MANIFOLD MATERIAL NO UISTH UISTR PIPE UISTHIBUTION PIPE MATERIAL & MARKING ELEV.'. ELEV. DIA ELEV. PIPES DIA: ELEVATION AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION HOLE SIZE HOLE SPACING CF:ILLEU COHHE(1 LY COVER MATERIAL VERTICAL LIFT CORRESPONDS TO APPROVED PLANS ^YES ^NO ^YES DNO COMMENTS: PERMANENT MARK ERS: OBSERVATION WELLS. ~~~ _ NUMBER OF PROPERTY FEET FROM LINE. ~ WELL: BUILDING: ^YES ^NO ^YES ^NO ( NEAREST-- Sketch System on Retain in county file for audit. Reverse Side. SIGNATURE. TITLE: DILHR SBD 6710 (R. 01/82) ~"~ w'S`°neu, APPLICATION FOR SANRARY PERMR - D 1 L H R ~i '°~O1 ^ rOUNTY (PLB 67) ~ OEPQRTTEI'1T OF UNIFORM SANITARY PERMIT # ~ InOUSTRV,IgBOg6 MUTgf1gELFiTIOnS ~sd~ a -Attach complete plans in accord with s. H 63.05, Wis. Adm. Code for the system, on paper not less than 8'/zx 11 inches in size. -See reverse side for instructions for completing this application. PLEASE PRINT PROP RTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS ,~- 3G sT ~ PROPERTY-I, C TION CITY: 114 /4, S , T,2~N, R E (or) ~I WN L T NUMBER BLOCK NUMBER SUBDIVISION NAME AREST ROAD, LAKE OR LANDMARK STATE PLA I.D. NUMBER TYPE OF BUILDING OR USE SERVED ~1 or 2 Family Number of Bedrooms: ~ ^ Public (Specify): THIS PERMIT IS FOR A: New System ~^ Tank Replacement ^ Repair ^ Replacement Soil Absorption System ^ Re ~ ' n ^ Privy ^ Alternate Svstem ^ Reconne n ^ Pe tion for Modification IF THIS IS A CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM COMPLETE THIS BLOCK. Seepage Bed ^ Seepage Trench ^ Seepage ^ Holding Tank System-In-Fill ^ In-Ground Pressure ^ Vault Privy ^ Pit Privy ^ Existing, For Which A Previous Permit Is On File, Permit # issue ^ An Existing System That Has Been Inspected And Is Compliant As Far As Soil Con tions. Total Gallons #of Tanks Prefab. Concrete Site Constructed Steel Fibe Plastic Septic Tank Capacity /~Q Lift Pump Tank/Siphon Chamber Holding Tank capacity Manufacturer: IF THIS IS AN ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM COMPLETE THIS BLOCK: Mound ^ In-Ground Pressure Total #of Prefab. Site Steel Fiberglass Plastic Gallons Tanks Concrete Constructed Septic Tank Capacity Lift Pump/Siphon Chamber Manufacturer: PERCOLATION RATE ABSORPTION AREA ABS RPTION AREA WATER SUPPLY: (Minutes per inch): REQUIRED (Square Feet): PROPOSED (Square Feet): /~~ ~H.~ 7 'r7~~ (~-Private ^ Joint ^ Public I, the undersigned, hereby assume responsibility for installation of the private sewage system shown on the attached plans. Name of Plumber (Print!: Signature: P MPRSW No.: Phone Number: Plumber's Address: ,~~1 f ` ( Na/me o/f Des',g r: ail/ COUNTY/DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Signat re of Issuing Agent: i .y ~ Fee: r ~as~ Date: / -~c~-~f~ pproved Disapproved ^ Owner Given Initial Adverse Determination Reason for Disapproval: Alternate course(s) of Action Available: DILHR-SBD-6398 (R. 5/82) DISTRIBUTION: Original to County, One Copy To; Bureau of Plumbing, Owner, Plumber • ~ APPLICATION FOR SANITARY PERMIT STC- 100 This application form is to be completed in i'ull and signed by the owner(s) of t;he pruperty being developed. Any inadequacies will only result in delays of the permit issuance. Should this development be intended for resale by owner/contractgz,("spec house"), then a second form should be retained and completed when the property is sold and submitted to this office with the appropriate deed recording. Owner of Property ~~ 67 ~ ~'Y,e~ p~~l( ~,~ ~ .TIC. Location of Property ~'~ ~~, Section ____~_, T ~ N - R -~ W Township _1'~ Gl. c~ ~O/t/` Mailing Address Q ~~ f ,~~bltk' S~ /S(O, r J~GC.d ,,~vPr/ X1/0 , S ~~! L Subdivision Name -_~~ ~'i,1/y~~ Lot Number Yom/ -• ~~ Previous Owner of Property ~~ >y ®~'Yj~1-oI~ £if~ 1t ~'AiCo 't'otal Size of Parcel lQ~~~ Date Parcel was Created ~a- ~~' Are all corners and lot lines identifiable? ~ Yes No Is this property being developed for resale (spec house) ? ~ Yea No Volume ~~ and Page Number __.L;._.~ as recorded with the Register of Deeds INCLUDE WITH THIS APPLICATION ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Warranty Deed 2. Land Contract 3. Other recordings filed with the Register of Deeds Office In addition, a certified survey, if available, would be helpful so as to avoid .delays of-the reviewing process. If the deed description references to a Certified Survey Map, the the Certified Survey Map shall also be required, PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION I ((vel ee~ctc:~y ~h.at a~ 4.ta~emen-tb an xhi,a ~orcm one ~.ue .ta xhe be6~ o~ my (awc) knawxedge; -tl~.a-t I (we) am (are) .the owner I b) o ~ .the pnape~.ty des e~.ibed ~.n zh~ia tin~anma~i.an ~anm, by v.uc-tu.e a6 a wa~vcan.ty d ed recorded ~,n .the 0~~~.ee a~ the Caun.ty Reg-i,b~en a~ fleede ab Daeume-tit No. ~-~c~ ;and ghat I (we) pne~entLy awn .the pnapobed 4-cte ion .the sewage poaa~. ~bya.tem (on I (we) have a~;~iz,%ne.d an easement, ~to nun w-i..th .the above deaen-ibed pnapelrty, ion xhe ca-~s.th.uct,%an o~ da~.d b ye.te.m, and the .same has been u~y recorded .in .the Os~~.ce a~ ;floe Cau-tity Kegtis.ten o~ Deeds, as ~Ooeument No. c ) -°~ ~ r"'rlat?CWM6MT No. a3'1'ATE ~ ~ .. - Mlar r ~ l -. ~ ~~ ~ ~ f~445 ~ ~:~ y , a Conlr~iot„ b.r ~.ew.~t ..,~ls~i~~t..R...atl[#7~fat.r...~t..4~ ` } ~ ~. `'~1~M` -.w..w..Nw.f.h.M..w...w...w..w.~wwM..w..M..MwM ',! ~ ~~ ...~~fyi ~~~. NMWMM..w.wTNw..•. .• ~S f ~~~M. ~~~ wl~ybN22r oM Oy ~~~~ #W....~w..+~a...~'~-Q~..~-sa.+....« ~ :~. ~ ~ ~, ..r ...................••.•••..•..••w,. •.,..,•,.,,.•..,•.• `~ ~ eta w ~. ~ ik ~'p l\ ,+ - 4 va+dor sdb +wd +tttw a esarq to Ptisduwe. +qiw ib. ~+wqt ~i ~ ~ ;Iz~,p?. _ .. ry tt~aua or this eoe-trait by Purol+vsr~ tM fo13wlat ysgw'gr. !~ wig 1M' , ~ - ' >twts, P~~''~~rr M1/ olMr a>lpaebeast blbMw4 (W M1M! Ma'?t~w~"~r'''°~:....~ ~i'~~ r ~ -~~ ~°~ i . -: . ZY ` 3~ of ~ of Section 7, TZ9p, R19N, EXCEPT tbo -.* ; South 30 _rods thereof . ~ ~'~- ~-~ .~. F s`^" ~, ~ ~' r j ~ ~ ;~~ All that part of the SEA of NE~t of 9eotion l~. `'!MR ~ .~: T29N, R20W, lying Sasterly of State Trunk ~ r , ''p ~ a~~ • ` Highway "35", EXCEPT. the South 32 rods tlNSydt~,, ,.~ ~ « ~y ' and EXCEPT that part tMreof lying Southerly sbnd ~~^~~ westerly of the Southwesterly right-of-way Ilse, ..: F~~ `-~ T ~,.' of the ease>stient described below. #;~`7~a~ s - ,. ''`'`:~. ~ e~y ~e rY~ ~ ~~ o~ r, SvHJECT TO anon-exclusive easement for ingress '.` :-~; of the SEC of the NEC of Section 12-29-T0, Town t~s! , ' ~ y ` described a s fol lows Co~amsncinq at the East ' ; Section 12j thence N90°00"00"W 1,332.81 feet tO 1»hs,~~- ~ •,~ $ o! S.T.N. "35"s thence N34°27'ZO"E 637.14 >~eet aLola>~. s'+tr3~ pj ~"°'MeY of S.T.H. "35" tO the Nly lies: of the property dt~... • ~ ~~`* windolff and Mary Ann is~indolff, as recorded 'in V~1:. #~~ ~~ :~~ No. 325163 in the Office of the St. Croix County 36s~gii~l~lt'~:ot . b~e-inq This ,i.8...riQ~..... hoa-estead proptstr• DESCRIPT2Ol1 NE~#.tyN ~Setiain iisl (is not) ~ , Purchaser ~~ to purchase the Property and Oo pq to Yssdrr>~lt,~° ~ ~":~ttl!°!i / ... .... thasnm of i--~c-?.~'-.~"' ..............................- in tho folbwfiK maoasrt 1a) ~.....r ..... ...... ....... at the execution of this Contract; asd (e) the b~uuiee of =,~~ti~~.~ ..--» ;~:'.=:T.; w~It. hl~M~h. MAR ...,.. , hereof on the bala"ca wtettitS~l~`ltOtll"~""11~•i~writ!'1~~ ,. ~` until paid in .,dl, as follows: Arousal instalLrents of $1,0,.000.00 each. plus acacrued irt, on Qar beftak+e~;t~ ,first and seeortd anniversaries of this CDettraCt, and the ent3z® balance, plrar~, stm3c's7al~d #a~+est.; on or before the third anniversary of this Oontract. See attac:ht~d ADOFI~ID(P! for pzwisioM for x+eleaee of ]?ate ~arid apQ~tic~e-t ~,~~~ thextebo. Estilleted Baal Estate 1~uoes for 1y84, I~Y~e ~ 1985, have been petlocatad at closing; Purchaser shall thus pay the entire 1984 Z`duoes artd subsequent' asdue. Provided, howe~rer, the entire oubtaadia~ balance shall be paid in sap oa or batara the..».'~~-. ..._.... day of F~ii't3~X.y . ..................... 188.... (the matarity date). ~ - Pollvwint; ony default in pa~•ment, interest shrD accrue at the rate of ..,~~.... % pet amnlas oa ~ eadire aastnot ' in default iwi,+ch shall include, without limitation. delinquent interest sad. upon acceleration os tnafyrity, the eatln ` prnzcipal bxlanrr ). :p. Purchaser, s,~ross to pq p~l~annoal taxes, rpeeial asasssments. firs and regaled iruraaee pseasiosoa ts'tww_dw, ~ _ and fuirtish copies of receipts oin Vls:boar's w~ittaen. rtequ~est. Papr.,ents ahaA be applied lint to interest on the aapaid bah'.aa at the rails apoeMed std tlwsl~'Pz~Pd• may` amours n,u} be prepaid without premium or fee upon principal at any time In the event of any prepayTnent, this contract shall not be treated as !n dsfaalt with respell is paymeiif so ioa~t as the unpaid balance. of prtncipai, -nd interest land in such case accruing interest from month to 10oalh aballl+e treater: as ;+,hr,rd pnucrpall is ?esx than the amount that said indebtcdnrss woald baee been had the monthly psytsteatr bebtt: n,adr as !'r,t ~prcrtied ni.ove; provided that monthly payments shall ba eontint>,ed [a the event of ttedit of-.Rai proceeds of ,n=crar,,•e or r•mdemn;,lion, the condemned premises being thereafter exeloded henfroat. i'ur, h.,rr ~tan•.:l:.t Pur.•ha:,•r is srtiyf:vd with the rtlr ss shown by the title e~ldeees sttbm!!bd to Purchaser far ••.:+mrr,at~on excrt,c: Within six (6) tronths hereafter, Vlen3or shall zlBCOrd a caertfied ogyy ~>f *.lu..~ ci:::~attt c:~.tificatc~ +>f William F. Marty, and release of ir9tleritarice tax liens in r~r~ .~~*,tc•r uF tt,~, F,r;tatk~ ~>f ilill.ir-un F. N1;irty, u~ nc~~ satisfaction of Pllrcttaser's attDrttiey. S'ur~!;asc:• ;t;^rer. : , ~,;: •~e .•-~Sf .,f !.rhrre t<t1r .:r:lrr~i. I' title evidence is in the form of an abstrsrt, it sh~il ',r a'a~•,,.,f `, ., O'••ndnr nr• ! V •~ `.,?i u~+rct:a+•. pr+cr i~ t,n;,l, init. i111'C!,a5.-~" tTkt}~ t13LrE3 Ck'?W dhSt.TdCtS pr T't ,• `_ - -....n ,___..,...._ ._ a- ._.. _r ,... ,_... .. 1?.• ri.ti, Uk;r,•i~f. v~rvx Cr1CY~T rt;,. ..~ ~M N say telex !~~ i t9ala a~~ ~rr• lydri ~ Y~r - ~r C - ~.` • ' Mti R' atw M ttaltr,r h Yager 011 iaasad ~' aM~itls .~.~- pytllMrt.'~ ~'~ `~ "'~"'e ~ '~Rc•+• s ' IPnrcMser shell k tl/e lla h as w PosMetr iaettred ~ ii~l• a! ~' • • tinded eorerap perils sad waA ot~6asaei ~ V~ir ~ rv4uira, ~ ~ ~ • ' blr Yaadot, b tea wgl of was ,~1:~... ,~,~~ ~~ „~~ ~' teat tM ealaaae eRN'lladr tli. CoutraK. lYtuYau%~t1iW ~ ~~ w~A aentair tb seaodard dame la Esser of w Vender4 laloreet sad, tsaiser Valdes ~~~w o! all pelicies ootrraeili~ tM aMsY M ~d wife Valdes. ?artllaeor .I Iwtltatlce eoelpaaias aa/ Vatdor. Idler Parohaer atoll Valor oeba•wlN anew la, te7i1111R ~ ` ee applied h n.toratioA a• r~dir K w Propa'ty daslasa/, provided the Vul/er Miort t>w ~r saonomktaUy feasible. is teaaottNM w aattait waste tree aNar waNa is be soa/taittted Nt tlr i,, to caaply aitb all lawn. eeriaaaeee~ae! ~ teriuP trot liew w/rtrMe b t#'t Mii<~~~M~ ' , s wrtr• Vardu aisrats that V nke the 0 1~ etdtll btgeat sad otltsr awllga t11ra0 ~e • taM Pureb~ieay ,tea War~eaetr D..etirah M V w tTaatatlnr aboa speeiilad, Yaldttr w!8 .. +.w.~wlil~r~4.1"~- sissple, at~wq~Prey.rty, tree and elver .: aN iiw wl~f any lies. or aoeuotbraolelg a~tM bX- ~bt ~~~ d~'f ~• ~ Qa8@!Iltll11L8 a8 rsQt •t02 t 111 ClIB , ~~Cl • - • ..~7Dti@ ~~ ................». .. .:.......... ' .•.bSr9B atf9~. AM..1~ar..Fr~O~V~{q~..~~-.~~.1bttL~Ct~R'Jf1i t>fl . bt?1+t7M1. " Purehaur egret that time is of thq _wanoe and (s) in the evertt of a dttalllt tit tht p.~l9ltrlt,tt aq t~N~ ~ - intsrest which eoatiaor for a period of .,....... days folbw iag the specified dw daRe K (b) h tTbe salt et iM1Y1/t i ppeerrformance of any other obligstlon of Ptlrcbaesr whkh continues for a p~~ of 3Q...., days f tarrittew coffee thereof by Vendor (delivered personally or mailed by oertitied maif), then tfia entiro oststaadiag Oahaeto tbi ewtt+r,MR !hall become immediately due and payable in full, at Vendor's option and without aetiee (wltd- lat~ellsott Mrlldy waiver), and Vendor shall also have the totlowing rights and remedies (snbjeM to any limitatiolu gotrYed rJ' Illwj is addition to thou provided by law or is equity: (i) Vendor may, at his t~tioa. tere>t311ata fhb Celttratt Aw/ 1h~011rIM1's rights, title and Interest io the Property and recover the Property bask tllroag6 strict tweelesna. wlf~ aq ' redemption to be conditiotxd upon Purchaser's full paytnrnt of the entire outstanding balance, with bteldat t6ae~eettTta~11 the date of default at the rate la effect on such date and Mbarstnonatsdueherenttdes(Inwbicbeveatallaalaraap.wthttrly aid by Pnrchasxr shall be toroteited as liquidated damages for failure to fulfill fhb Contract •od r reaW for tike petty it purchaser faib to redeem); or (ii) Vendor may sue for specific prrtormaace at tW Ce~traat to"eetelpet immediate and fall payment of the entire outstanding balance, with iaterat thereon at the rate in affect es the date d default and other attloanh due hereunder, in which event the Property shall be suctioned st judkieil eslo •ad 1P'art• shall be liable toe any deficiency; or (iii) Vendor tray sue at few for the entire unpaid purchase prior er asy portion thereof; ar (ir) Vendor relay dedaro•this Contract at an end and remove this Contraetaasebud o/l tiW is a gotefLWe action if the etptitable fnterrst of Purchaser fa insignificant; and (v) Vendor may have Purchaser efaehd from pesaeasioo of the Property and have a receiver appointed to collect any rents, issues or profits duritlg the petldwey of any otQion under (i), (ii) or (iv) sbove.liotwithstanding any oral nr written statements or actions of Yendar as eiioetioa of any of the forerroilyt; remedies shall ody be binding upon Vcndur if and when pursued in litigation sad a1f cosh sad alpetl.es including reasonable attorneys tea of Vendor incurred to rnforcrany remedy hereunder (whether t~bated or' set) is the' extent not prohibited by law and espenses of title rvidrnce xhrll ire added to principal and paid by, Purchaser, as in. cursed, and shall be included in any judgment. Upon tM commetteemeat or during the pendenc • of any action of foreclosuro of this Contraett Pnrehaeer eolw>ats 1o the appointment of a receiver of the Property, inc~udin homcatxad interest. to oolieet the rents. fever, sad proA4 of the Property during the pendency of such action, and ruck strata, iaauea, and profits what so colNeted shall be held sad applied ar the court shall direct. * Purchaser shall not transfer, sell or convey uny te);al or r. uituble intcrat in the Property (by assignment of say * of Purchaser's rights wader this Contract or by option, long-term lease or in any other way) witbeut tbs.a~er~ * consent of Vendor melees either the outstanding balar.~e payable under this Cowttaat fs~tk.t patti,~~"1~'~~w • * conveyed is a pledgeor assignment of Purchaser':, inters ~t under this ('ontrnet aolel} as security fee an indebtedness of ,r Purchaser. In the event of any aueh transfer, sale or convey Hoer with,rut ~'rndor'a written consent, the entire outstanding * balance pa able render this Contract shall become immediately due rind payable in full, at Vendor's opLiea without tletree. Vendor shall make all payments wFrn due ender eras mortPage nutatandirur .frainet the Property Ott t11e dwi- of this Contract (e=cept for any morytage granted by Purchaser) or under Dray note secured thereby. provfdad f-~ptrhaser makes timely paymeni of the amounts then due under thin Co ntrart. F'urchaaer may make ear aueh paytnente directly to the Mortgagee K Vendor fails to sin so ranee all ua• mc•nt, sn made he Purchaser shall Frr cun~idcred payments made on ~ _ thin ('ontract. Vendor may waive any default witfiout waivin); any other suLsei)ucnt or prior default of Purchaser. All .terms of this Contract shall he binding upon and inure to the beneAts of the heirs, lard represootattvrl, auaesaors and aasi~os of Vendor and Purchaser. (tf not an owner of the Property tM spouse of Yaeior for a valaabie cansidcratien joins ha•ein to release homeatrad rights In the r.ubject Property and agrees to join in tM etteenliett of the deed to Ire made in titlflllmcnt hareof.l llatccl tl~,s 231:'Cl slay of FCl]rt3c~lYy 19 84 13, & H. I7E1/Q,OPI~3V'I', INC. (Pt1rcllaser) • , _ _ ~+ }t,.~,(~ ~ ~i i~ (~ i.l r . I S F. A 1, I BY: /sta~~>~C , ~ ~''2''t'`~+t/ ~ 1 ti k:A f. i s Aili.ta P. M3rtV ~(~~endor) ! naltl 1:. 3j tad, Presitent I , b: A T . t ~IICj : ~.~%t/"tT^ • C. ~ "~~• , • ~ Fs ~: ; ~• ~•. -• William C. Harwell, SHCret,Bar}~- ' ' ~~~ ~ Y° ,'s ., r ~ .ti~_ AUTHENTICATION " ~'.~ } ~Y;~ `: ~' ACKNOWLED011i1EN~ a • .yam ~~ ,ti ail;nature/n) Of 11111 td P. MaT'ty, c3 Sifx3le S'I'AT!•; ()l•' Wi~CONSIti ,-'~7 ~ . ti 140f1k3Tl, ~ .yt, h~ tNr• . ST. C1;JnIX t:nunt •. r•uthw.Zticutt`d th;.: 23~dar of FE'~~lY 1984 1'rr,~~null> cams bet„rr mr this .23rd :day. of . r , ; , i~ Febru.~~2~~ )C, 84 rite abuv+ names! • ' -' Dnnalci E. Bjornstad, President, steel . Faobert F. 1.11 willi.un C. H~-trwell, Sec-reCar~r, ~f said TI-I'T.F: 't1 F. \lltF'1t ~T.1•I'F: Fs.>i: t)F' N i.~ ,r~;;l\ Cc?1j~ratiOn, t*t'tc~ acksx~lcxic3ed that .they t?Dom, exec-utc~cj this irlstrulmnt as such officiers. .. ~,~ ,Z T,~~ ; ;n.:,,,;, ~~~, .~.,,t 1 ~f s.~ic? C~r~"•'>{ati.on ~y its a~lthpritV,tFte~ f,'~-.~,o:r tt~Hu;::. ;t :,r,r~ xci.nowiFfii4t• ttiitiYaamr. tGi 1 l t~tTTt ,T, ('i.llirrt,, I!tt~= '•+, , ~. ' ?t?•..i'I', ,~^~'Jc1: S i'l`F'i'~:.', ~ t;i.l li,).^t ,?. ,;i;lx~rt i'.ir. F+nx X21, F;u,T•a:;; tn/t -.._ .. ~ ~• ,. ~Y. (~rr~ix ~- ... ~~ • ; • f ;Y~ fi~5„~~47 ADDENDUM CONTINdATION,OF PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS Page A the ply line of the South 32 rods of said SEC of Nab of 8~otioef 1~i-~8p~ thence N90.00'00"E along said Nly line of said Mindolff preperty #os 248.49 feet to the centerline and Point of Beginning of said 50 lest Nde, easement, being described along said centerline as follows theac~e N12°55'00"W 199.43 feats t2~enee Ni11y on a eurw concave to. the 841, l~iitvisltq •a radius of 99.45 feet, whose chord bears N46°05'00"W 108.82 tj,thenae N79.15' 20"W 111.50 feet, more or less, to the Ely right-of-~ra~- ~o! B.T.H. "35" and the Point of Termination o! said easement. tFos the ~aspoared of this description, all bearings are referenced to the East-lMst quarter-section line of Section 12-29-20, assumed N90°00'00"M3. SUBJECT TO recorded easements for e.ectric and telephone lies;. SUIIDIVISION AND RELEASE OF LOTS: Vendor agrees that Purchaser may subdivide said Property, with all voEta associated therewith to be paid by Purchaser, and that Vendor wi31. join in execution of any plat(s), certified survey map(s) and other iosttWaents necessary for such subdivision, except that Vendor's interest shall sat be subordinated to any indebtedness incurred by Purchaser. Purchaser may develop, improve and sell subdivided lots, with or rtbout buildings being constructed thereon by Purchaser. Vendor agrtu to release such lots upon sale thereof by Purchaser, by Vendor's ~c~cution of Warranty Reeds thereto to Purchaser; Purchaser shall prepare and fur- nish at Purchaser's expense all suc'~ 'darranty Deeds and the associated Real Estate Transfer Returns, except the final warranty t~+d,~a>Ad~arfer~-. Return conveying the remaining part of said Property which shall be at Vendor's expense. Upon such release and donveyance of lots,; ;the; value. .of each released lot shall, for calculation of the transfer fee, 3~:dete~mined by rounding off the acreage of-the lot(s) released to the Hearses even number and multiplying same by 51,500.00 per acre; the transfer fee sbali °'_ be paid by Vendor. Upon conveyance of the remaining part of said Property, the balance of the transfer fee not paid upon lot releases shall then be paid by Vendor regardless of the acreage of such remaining'part. Upon Vendor's release of lot(s) as aforesaid, Furchaser shall have. paid or shall then pay to Vendor an amount equal to 50$ of the selling price paid. to Purchaser for such lot(s) released; provided, however, that th8 510,000'.00 annual payments due on the first and second anniversaries of this Contract,. shill be deemed advance payment toward such release-payments, thus entitling Purchasers to release of lot(s) for sales up to $20,000.00 for .each Such . annual payment, and Purchaser shall be obligated only to pay 5011 of the selling prices that exceeds 520,000.00 aggregate with respect to sue'h credit for each annual payment. All payments received shall be applied first to~ interest and then to principal. The S10,000.00 down .payment paid at the execution of this Contract shall not be applied to any release of lots; but instead shall be deemed to be advance payment toward Vendor's release anc: joinder in the dedication of public roads and of any parkland or similar areas which Purchaser may be required to dedicate pursuant to the :;ubdivisi:~n of said Property. it is the belief of the parties that such 510, 000.'10 dawn p~iyment, .a?>r~lied t~ release and dedication. of .lands t.o the TGwn of i~ucisor. for i>ubl is use, i s exempt from real estate transfer .fee t~ursuant to S~:c. 77.25(2}, Wis. Stets., and that transfer fees will thus be clue ~nl•; ~~pan Sti4,]05.U0, t~~ be paid by Vendor as provided above. W ., ,_,,..,...,.,.,,, nor _ _::e'r. ..; ~.,/''~a'•:'+ M _ ,; ~ - ,. .. ,. _ ~ • S .. _. ~. fi~5 ~E 44~ - • ~••. Nothwithstandinq the aforsaid method of calculating ttre a~ooat to `3ta ~-asd to Vendor for release of lots, rurchaser shall be obligated fro Pal ate additional amount, if any, for lot releases to assure that the rMai~nq acreage not theretofore released as lots or dedicat+rd to th+s p~sblic, i~ multiplied by 51,500.00 per acre, does not exceed the =~osininq balance due under this Contract. The foregoing provisions shall be deemed to nwdify any conflicting titan • this Contract which prohibits or restricts transfer or coawyance of aid Property, to the extent necessary to give full force and effect to the foregoing provisions. ,~„ 9 ~. a STC- 105 SEPTIC TANK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT St. Croix County OWNER BUYER~~ ~ ~ )' ,Ca~/V~ ~~(/ ~-~'~'" ROUTE/BOX NUMBER ~ ~ .~ S~ ~~a 1 ~~ ~~ ~Vi Fire Number w. CITY/STATE '~tC.,c.~SoJ(/ i `~~< ZIP ~Syp/[ PROPERTY LOCATION: SF ~, /I/VV~, Section, T ~~ N, R~W, Town of ~ u~So c(/ St. Croix County, Subdivision ! ~c~G~ Y(/aoU Lot number 9~-9.~. Improper use and maintenance of your septic system could result in its premature failure to handle wastes. Proper maintenance con- sists of pumping out the septic tank every three years or sooner, if needed, by a licensed septic tank pumper. What you put into the system can affect the function of the septic tank as a treat- ment stage in the waste disposal system. St. Croix.County residents m_~y a maximum of 60% of the cost of which was in operation prior to accepted this program in August owners of all new systems agree maintained. be eligible to replacement o July 1, 1978. of 1980, with to keep their receive a grant for f a failing system, St. Croix County the requirement that systems properly The property owner agrees to submit to St. Croix County Zoning a certification form, signed by the owner and by a master plumber, journeyman plumber, restricted plumber or a licensed pumper veri- fying that (1) the on-site wastewater disposal system is in proper operating condition and (2) after inspection and pumping (if nec- essary), the septic 'tank is less than 1/3 full of sludge and scum. Certification form will be sent approximately 30 days prior to three year expiration. I/WE, the undersigned, have read the above requirements and agree to maintain the private sewage disposal system in accordance with the standards set forth, herein, as set by the Wisconsin Depart- ment of Natural Resources. Certification form must be completed and returned to the St. Croix County Zoning Office within 30 days of the three year expiration date. St. Croix County Zoning Office P.0. Box 98~ SIGNED ~-'~~ ~j~ DATE H z N H 9 r r a H 0 z d a H tT1 Hammond, WI 54015 715-796-2239 or 715-425-8363 Sign, date and return to above address. O N r m S ~ ~ m m c V ~ N OD z ` m N a ~~ y~ o `l1` e n ~~m • ~J ~.. '~ ~ f"D '--1 Q1 ~ ~!! lA N ~ O ~ ~• v, w ~ ~ ~ ° ~ m ~ o ~ ~sw~ ~ v~ '3 o `~~ ~` ° `~ 3 ~~ o ° ~ ~ a ~ co N g ~ ° m , p pFo ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ d v ~ ~ o a m ~ ~ a ww coi ..~ ~~v` X30. o~°~~w ~ 1 ~ ' ~ O O X 0 0 -., . ,,,C L C ~~ y ~'Z~ °c~<Q~ ~ ~ w »' '` 1o w w ~ ,~ o - co ~• ~ o '"' D -a~o~vv n ~ ~ N + Q. ~~ Q ~ . ~ v,~ ~o o pDc_o o -. =w o c w o w . „ ~ o m~ o r w ~ -, o ..aQ~ m oNm o~~ww~ K ~ n o N m o m o ?a (D -+~ ~ O ^' N ~ y 7 was ?~~~ w o v N m a i m vi ?ate °1 ~ w ,~ v ac ~ f c~ 3 m c v ~ ~ a'~ ~ ? muc,? ~m m °aoW~.u ,' w ~ ~Qw -c ~o am N o ~ w a o "- w .. N o ~ a Q~ f a~N G)cc~ o~i~ncDo aca scco= ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° ~ ~ o.~ a m ~ s ~~ 0 ~ ~ Q 1 O C N z a v Z ~ ~ D m ~ ~ ~ c m n ~ _ ~ m `~ ~ ~ ((V~~ ~ "t • S \~^~l 0 'J r DEPARTMENT OF ~'i INDUSTRY, ~~ LABOR' AN1~ '~ ` •• i-IUMAN ~iELATIpNS REPORT ON SO#L BOR#NGS ANA SAFETY 81 BUILDINGS DIVISION PERCOLATION TESTS (115} MADISON W153707 1H63.09(11 dt Chapter 145.045) s ~' I ~~4N`~~~ OWN3..jl i UNICIPALITY: 7 ~ Z° N~R 19 gtor ~ ud oN T N 9t-9Z -. U I Ear, ~ •~T _~ COUNTY: ST CRo Ix O R' R AM ~N ~c~t~:~,oPMEn1 t' ~ 36 ST ~.f~olx ST NoRTA /,~uA nnt, ~ 54ai6 --- unrastassersv~-rtc>'nstt ~98b a1 JA E , N , RATING: S= Site suitable for system Um Sita u_ nsuitabi~ for system T . M • O I~E IN ~ -FILL. • OLDIN TANK: RECOMMENDED SYSTEM • ; ' ); ~ ~;C~~l ~~ ~ ~ a~ Q S ^~ Q ~ ~U ^S ^U , ~ / ~ VENT At. ~X7t7 , If Percolation Tests are NOT required under s.H63.09151fb), indicate: NA DES/I~G-N.RATE: ~-~-a1S~ ~ If any portion of the tested stN it in tfte -. Fl l oodp ain, indicate Floodplaln elevation; hc~. C^t PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS Residence ND. B CD ,~,-- 10 -- New ^Replace BORING NUMBER OTAL DEPTH'I~11 ELEVATION R U OBSE V ATER-IN H S HA A IL URE, AND DEPTH TO BEDROCK IF OBSERVED S E A BRV.AN 8A ~ • B-b i 9z g3.og o o-o.ri gcTS c;,,~5- ,zq ,Rnl ~.f.t.. ,~o- z' ~ G5 ~Caa cob ' t3- 7 ~ ~~ 92.47 on1>+ o-i.o J3~'r5 /,U-3•is I~fll' p ~N s~~ 3 _ e ~' lac 7./ ~7 7 B- , B- B- B- PERCOLATION TESTS NUMBER DEPTH INCHES WATER IN HOLE AFTER SWELLIN TEST TIME W ES A G INTERVAL•MIN. PER INCH P- p_ R P_ Pf. I-r-___ ..~. ~ ~ _. ,~ , PLOT PLAN: Show locations of percolation tests, soil borings and the dimensions of suitable 'soil areas, Indttatta scale or distances. 0eac-ibs what ere the hori- contal and vertical elevation reference points and show their location on the plot plan. Show the surface elevation et ail borings end tl~ direction and percent ~f land slope. 6YSTEM Et~EVATION 9,v' - _ ._ I ~'- ~ ~-- ~~ ~,_ r -` 1 ~, ~ .._.------- i._. r ~ ~ ____ t~ ` ~ - ~ _ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, I ~ ~ ~ I, .. ,~ ~ ~ ~ , . SZ, ," . . f ~ ~ ._ __ - 59 i ~ ~~ ~ , 1 3 I . Ate. RiJ /-r>: ~ _ ~ ... ' .. SvSTE t~f,` , .. ~. ,Z I B 7- II .. .~~, w......~ 1 r ~ c BM. ' ` E~EddTlnu IOCa,Ot3 L i, the undersigned, hereby certify that the soil tests repo tad an this form were made by me in accord with the procedures and methods specified in the Wisconsin ~~ I~E:PARTMENTOF REPORT ON SOIL ~O~~iGS AND INDUSTRY, ' LABOR AN° PERCOLATION TESTS (115) HUMAN RELATIONS (H63.09(1) & Chapter 145.Q45) SxtFETY..3~ !i';.31i•D1111GS DIVISION P.o. 80X_7969 MADISON, W1.63707 LO ,ATI N~ 5 ~. ~/Irv1~/ SECTION: ~_ /T z ~N/R ~~d~'~r TOWNSHIP UNICIPALITY: ~ /-]u Q5o OT NO.: /-9 Z BLK. NO.: - SUBDIVISION NAME: ELI: wc~~ ~~~A ~ E~_ZL COUNTY: - ir.~~:IX WNE, ,S - E: -~~ 1~tr~i:~,•~t:~T /,,tL M IL A OR $~6 ~-r~~~,xST ~l. l~ui~~~ ~r 5~401a~, USE UA 1 EJ UtfStli V A 1 IUNa MA YC I ~ T STS: ~ S L~E~ °i i9 Qe~ /o /~~ S~~~s ott Pg4t 4`'3 SOrt-S S A ~z - SANTIA4>S LIATIIUG• Sm Silo eui~aAlu fnr evafwm 1Is Sitw uneuitaFfla fnr fVSt61T ~ ,,rr IU M I\~ d ~ ~ ~Y .Residence NO. BEDRMS.: COMM A S RIPTIO ' --- - - New ^Replace U~ k ONVENTI NAL: ~ C MOUND: IN-G : T " S ST - N-FILL OLDING TANK: RECOMMENDED SYSTEM:( tional) ~ ]U S DS~IU ~ S ^U DS~~U DS:~1U c~~~~~r~~~L ~-~ If Percolation Tests are NOT required DESIGN RATE:`-_( If any portion of the tested area is in the under s.H63.09(51(b), indicate: ~ ~LiQSS ~-- \Z~ I Floodplain, indicate Floodplain elevation: ~ A ~~~ r T PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS BORING TOTAL PTH R UN DWATER-INCHES CHARACTER OF SOIL WITH THICKNESS, C LOR, TEXTURE, AND DEPTH NUMBER DEPTHS ELEVATION OBSERVED IGH TO BEDROCK IF OBSERVED (SEE ABBRV: ON BACK.i B- 1 g )o~ g9.Z4' -~(oNt - °,.r ` ~-~ ~~ @LC-rS o.S-2.3 T Ie:N S.L ?•~-3.°a'$~uStl~R ~9-7.o n < b . B- Z 9.'~Q /4'S 4Z` /~(olvt ~ g ,~ 0-0.3" LLTS r,.2-/.3 L-r$,tIJ~rL /~3-3L.~ Yf R>`I ~=..L w-~'co6 3.~- °~.S ~NP~~S'f~'r: COO B- 3 9.So' ioo.o4~ nloN~ ~ > 9 ,~S o-~•Z $~l.T`S o.Z-~•S" ~r e,v SIL /.S -3. 'Blew , 3.4-7~2' >Q4 $Rni raed S.tGr 72-9.1; ned kbl S ~c~ob,l ST B- 4 ` 7.:~0 g7 oU~ ^IoNt ` > 7.8 o-c~.Z Bf_LTS V.2-I•Z $RivS,L cob s,L Z 2'3.3' S~6£ CoM 3~~-7.53 Mall $ +CaR cob $'ct B ~ ~ ,Ip 9~.ZS ~ ~oN~ ~ °~' ~ c~-o.S 53tLT5 o.S-Z•S ~rBRNSI ?.'~~~.0 SAC Q,O-Q•~ UrtBL 5,L 4.5-~,l'M~d1 S~t4k ~ceb . B- ~~~ ~Y PERCOLATION TESTS TEST DEPTH WATER IN HOLE TESTfitME D U IN WA R V -IN H S RATE MINUTES NUMBER 5 AFTER SWELLING INT RVAL- IN. P D P I PER INCH P- I '7.3 I N I' ' ' '~ ~ 7 p- 5.32 0 1y.SZ ~ /Q ~ I ~. I , .___ __.~__ _. __ _.._ N. tSe-rti ~ Rc M 8,t i! i ,C a~i~ciwr; fi Ta fl~AC.6 N't/ ING+ i~M~l~ . irLJT PLAN: ,tiow locations of percolation testa, soil borings and the dimensions of suitablo soil areas. Indicate scale or distances. Descril+e what 2ro the hori- zontai and vertical eleva ,on re erence pom s an sow air oca ,on on Zflat'plo AfTll>; a rcent of land slope. SYSTEM ELEVATION 93,Z' - E~c~c:WOOIs ~~N~ 5 I~~ Lxla-~~ o ~! • r ,~. .~ i ,..,i _ , :~f ~., -- . , ~+ /UO CP^Kb ~dr Eli .YO 3 f>~.:~>~o,. ~ -r~.. NO UDSON '`"d` `~ ~-~ Low ~~ "~ r-4 -- AST E R~- 1~--~--__ e6 _ _____ -s -~- ..~.., ~,.s i ~ (i.4 q ~ '~ 4~' ~.~- I o.o r t: S.isTE to ~---36.5 g-Z ~~ Z. l.c~-r °'aZ e bL~ As TH s~~ /" ao' Lo K ' IUO.OG~ ~G ~„-~, ~i~ -~~ ~rd; J ~_ /~X~s~ ~~ ~ _._~_ ~ ~~ ~ p. __ ~~. _ - __ __ __ ~ 'h ,~'~ I3--3 $ .~ /35 ,~ G `~ ~'~~ i/ ~~~~-.~-----_____ __ ~^ '~ r r t y/~ i ~ ! ~ it • _ ~ /r Gv ~ ___._ ., ~~ ~° ~ L.