HomeMy WebLinkAbout020-1010-10-000N
N
O
RECEI~
SUN 12 200
N ~,CG & ZONING O
P~
-_
z
0
U
4
v
F~
Z
~Q
at/~
N C C L °" C d
0 N
3
m
f
o ~_
~ a o
o ~
~ a a
mnE ~'
~ m
~m
y m rn
' ~Qo
'
~
.
- rnE
W Y a.
c~E ~
O
o O1
~°im
~ y
to m
cc
o
t- d
a ~ H
E m o O
m
~
Q o H °m-o ~.
' i7
a
0 V- Y ~
~ ~ N ~
~
Z ~
O C ~
N- `
m 'O > ~
m ~
m "O
O ~"~ ? ~ .O d
fn N m
Z ~., V E NO.U ~ -~
U
~ ~
a
o `m m
'q L
3U
vs
a a,
w E
E
~o C c > o' o a~
~
M ~ m O ~ > ~
. Ha m d..E •~ m~,
~ d~
~
d ~
d ~'~ m"
d p y
y~
!J~
~ c-
m m
~ 3
OC v
o o ~
; ..
L
m~~ E «•
°' o
~
0d „ d
L
w f
d Y .
; O ,,,,~
` D~ U 1
~` ~
~
Q y
o ~°' «°mm~
' ` °E
2
U .
~m
am a'O
m~ cE~ d
~.o c
• vo
~m ~'«.
$a
m
m3
L ~
m~
L y
c ~
t c0 3 C c E
L ~_, ~L
~~
y
H'«
H ~ d O
~ u C' y
U~
~ m m
>
U c m io
~ 7
=
m
`°-•a ~o y
vHod g~ `
do`
w
c
.~
a
m
.~
Q
d ?
m
~, `o
c ~
~ ~
..>
'~ ,
..
u
E~
d«
aE
>o
«~
d
~ c
N w
N ,Q
L O
I- ~
A
~ro
w L
. y
'I
l
w
z
U
o~
m
J
0
w
Q
U
O
w
O
z
0
H
u
~~
ac
z
~i
Y
U
O
J
m
U
w
~-
O
J
oC
O
0
z
Q
w
`~
1
`_
1
O
M~
W
w
Z
w
r~
V /
W
z
o~
~W
0
~~
0
0
LL
{ y
Q
W
}
O
C!)
w
o~
x
w
_~
oC
aw.
v~
~~
O
J
W
H
C~
- Z
Z
O
D
O
a
w
z
0
Z~
_~
W
J
m
` Safety and Buildings Division
201 W. Washington Ave., P.O. Box 7162 County . .
/ C~O~ C,~
7 Madison, WI 53707 - 7162 Sanitary Permit Number (to be filled in by Co.)
_ (608)266-3151 ~ ~~0~ / ~J
merce
De artment of Com ~t
O~
d
State Sanitary Permit Application Stat
Plan LD. Numbcr
~.~'~-,~;~, l.g`~~`~7~
l i
id
Wi
Ad
f
1
i
C
s.
ode, persona
n
on you prov
e
,
m.
ormat
In accord with Comm 83.2
Project Address (if different than mailing address)
may be used Cor secondary purposes Privacy Law, s 15.04(1)(m)
I. Application information -Please Print All Information
Property Owner's Namc Parcel q Lot q Block q
~'~SC ~ ~ ~~~~~
_
{ Property Owner's Mailing Address tion
Property Loca
~,,
~~~ C~~ i \~ v~ `
`
v U '/.
Section ~
~
Y.
d
Zi
C
Ph
N
b ,
_
_
,
City, State p
o
e one
um
er
* ` ,, \
1v d~ 1V \
~c7~~ ~L1 ~~S ~~~ ~j~I~~ T ~ N, R~Eoo~l~„t~)
I1. Type of Building (check all that apply)
^ I or 2 Family Dwelling - Number of Bedrooms Subdivision Name CShi Number
i
^ Publtc/Co:nmercial -Describe Use
~~~~ ~` S't'/C`2 ~'~•
,~/ ~f
~Statc Owned -Describe Use ^Ci ^Villa a ownshi oC
i ~ ~ ~.~
III. Type of Permit: (Check only one box oo line A. Complete line B if applicable)
A' New System ^ Replacement System ^ Treatment/Holding Tank Replacement Only ^ Other Modification to Existing System
~ Q• ^ PertnitRenewal ^ Permit Revision ^ Chartge of ^ Permit Transfer to New Ust Previous Permit Numbcr and Date Issued
Before Expiation Plumber Owner
IV. T e of POWTS S stem: Check all that a 1
r
~ ^ Non-Prusurizcd In-Ctround ^ Mound > 24 in. of suitable soil ^ Mound < 24 in. of suitable soil ^ At-Grade ^ Single Pass Sand: Filter ^
Constructed Wetland ~Pressuriud In-Ground ^ Holding Tank ^ Peat Filter ^ Aerobic Treatment Unit ^ Recirculating Sand Filter ^
' Recirculating Synthetic Media Filter ^ Leaching Chamber ^ Drip Line ^ Gavel-tus Pipe ^ Otha (explain)
V. Dis ersal/I'reatment Area Information:
Design Flow (gpd) Deign Soil Application Rate(gpdst) Dispersal Area Required (st) Dispersal Arw Proposed (sf) System Elevation
VI. Tank Info Capacity in • Total Numbcr Manufacturer Prefab Site Steel Fiber Plastic
Gallons Gallons of Units Concrete Constructed Glus
Ncw Exisiinj
Tanks Tank:
Septic or Bolding Tank \ ^ c, rcT~r\ ' S~
Aerobic Treaancnt Unit
Dosin; dumber X' ~ uW ` VV Q. Cb~
VII. Ruponsibiltty Statement- I, the undersigned, assume responsibility for Installs lion of the POw'TS shown on the attacbed plans. ~
Plumber's Name (Print) Plumber's azure MP/MPRS Number Business Phone Numbcr
ti. .~.~ 3 ~S ~~~ -~3~
Plumber's Address (Sucet, Ciry, State ode)
a ~~ ~ ~~' ~~~ ~ ~
VIII. Coen /De artment Use Onl
Approved
^ Disapproved Sanitary Permit Fef~tncludes Groundwater
S
h
F Date Issued Issuing Agent Signaler (No Stamps)
arge
urc
ce) fP~ (~®
6f'
~ ~g,.
^ Owner Given Reason for Denial
!X. Conditions of ApprovaUReasons for Disapproval
Please contact Waste Water
Specialist Leroy Jansky at
i /1,-/GV-GJ4~F 1Vl- 411 lll,ilClaIV11
Attach congdclr plant (tu Ihr Cuunty only)
the rritrm on paprr not Irtt Ihan alr2 ~ 11 Inehre in sin
cnn_i'i0R fit fit/nil
POWTS INSPECTION REPORT
Willow River State Park -Service Building Project
GENERAL INFORMATION
Permit Holder's Name
Willow River State Park ^ City ^ Village ®Town of
Hudson County
St. Croix Sanitary Permit No.
360212
State Plan/Site ID No.
1543971/738503 Legal.
NW %<, SW %4 , S10, T29N, R19W Property Address.
1034 C H A, Hudson, WI 54016
TREATMEN T COMPONENT INFORMATION SETBACKS FT
TYPE MANUFACTURER
AND MODEL NUMBER CAPACITY P/L WELL HZO LINE BLDG. VENT
SEPTIC Wieser Concrete 5,000 >2' 142' >10' 24' na
DOSING Weiser Concrete 3,000 >2' 170' >10' 45' 48'
FILTER PolyLok Model PL 525 10,000gpd
PUMP /SIPHON INFORMATION
Manufacturer: Goulds Model No. 3887 Demand in GPM: 175 TDH - Desi n 10.0'
FORCE MAIN INFORMATION FRICTION LOSS FT
Length
20' Diameter
3" Dist. To Well
182' System Head
2.5' Force Main Losses
1.43'+ 0.75 Vert. Lift
4.32' TDH - As Built
9.0'
SOIL ABSORPTION COMPONENT
TYPE OF COMPONENT: Conventional Pressurized COVER MATERIAL: T ar 3151 Geotextile Fabric
Cell Width
6.0' Cell Length
90.0' Cel( Depth
2.4' to 2.7' Cell Spacing
4.0' No. of Cells
6 E. Cells Elev.
908.07' W. Ceiis Elev.
906.94'
DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: Washed, hard a re ate
SETBACK INFO. FT Pro e Line > 5' Bld 20' Well 180' H2O Line > 10' OHWM Na
DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT
Header /Manifold Distribution Lateral(s) Orifice Orifice Obs. Pipes.
size S acin Inst. & No.
Len th 23' Dia. 3" Len th 86' Dia. 2" S acin 3' 3/16" 2' Yes 2/Cell
COVER MATERIAL AND GRADING COMMENTS
1. Finish grading not completed. Seeding and mulching to be done by others.
2. 1.8 to 2.1 feet of soil cover over the dispersal cells with a silty topsoil material for vegetative cover.
DEVIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLAN
1. 6" dia. effluent pipe between septic and dose tank used instead of 8" pipe.
COMMENTS
1. Provide vent on dose tank.
2. Provide appropriate warning label on dose tank manhole cover.
3. Provide specifications for pump and controls and show that they meet design specifications.
4. Provide documentation for model of pumps used.
5. Provide frost sleeve around buildin sewer cleanout riser i e.
COMPONENTS NOT INSPECTED
1. Electrical -make sure conduit into control panel is sealed gas tight.
2. . Distribution system manifolds not fully completed.
Plan Revision Required
^ Yes ®No Date:
6/10/2009 Signature o ector: Cert. Number
71599
Sketch dfi other ~de
WEAL /u'
f~~~Jl~-! E G{~
I
~IM = 4//r ~ ! .~.. ~
gs~ c,o. _ gag~4q'
57'~ to - ~trl, L ~ 1^.o,f~, y'
r~
c
s i G~-r - Qu -7 ~ Y Z- T`; v. ~.
M
P c. l rJ -- ~ 0 G , ~ 7 T, a, ji?, ~ `~
r
~ S, 6t~o GAL. w~&ge~
Chu. f 5~. =- 08.0'71 M~-~ar t p~ `l 0 8.-7-, s
~p77c 'r~,r+l~
c~.u. ~. S~ . `~ Gfo.9~ r tap,a ~~ 9o't,7r' ~ ,
6" ~ i
~„ r'
_., ~ -
if ~F
3c~cp C~-.t_ ' S~LVI~
D~s~ 'f'I~NI~ BLS .
~\ ~ ~ ~ ,
~' ~ ~ 910 ,q '
( '~
~;
` ~'
oes, t~s f.~s ' j i
T`FP , ~~
t; ' ~ ~
f r
LATERAL t=fu's{.}
~' VWL.V~ MM°rN-{-per -T~.~iP~
~J
` 1 l
__
1
N oT~s ;
~ , ~yP^~2 351 UStn Tv cauE2-f~~rart~
.z 6 '' ~.FZU~r ~-~~ k 5±_D iNSr~rj of ~ ~~
3~ MAN ~~~~ LNG-rrt- ,~ z3 ` ~v~~7/ z/ g~g,7~
S-,~~-~
~ r #4 ,,
,. N 3~S i 5,~~ ,~ r, `'1
~~„.;~ ~ „. ~ ~ .Fyn„ "'~ g' ~ ~ _ .:
i ti
.ys ~1 ~ y
x z~
.. a "_ s.
f
~ 5 f >
`t ( ~~~
n. Y ~
} ~,,~(.
~ ~ s .~,y~{~ '';~~ L r ~ ire ~ 1t. ~ ~~
a tit .y` ,.} h .-~ {~ .7 S~ '~! A
n ~ RT ~' ~ 1
` ~ 7 3 ~, < ~t+i ~ fir, ; a'. i~Al .r ~ j~ 't~R` ~ "".'ybiH:,
w :'~ r~ ~ '1 ~'
,f , i ~`'!d~'7. i ~ .'~ ~' a'~ f _; ~ - '.mar s
B, b1 f ~ 1 «
n l$s~. ~ x ,, ~.
jtr~t}~'~ ~. .. ~`' ~{ ~~ ~ r
~r~ ~ ~ ' ti. kk~ ..i
~ a,
m c
's '~. ~
Y
,~ ,7 a ~
~~ ~~~ ! r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
+~ ' ; ~ ,
~ ~~~ .~--
w ,
°~~~ h
r ,
s
`wY ~~~ t. '.f. :'~w1.~C w »t.', ~ ~ ~ ! Y.. ,Rti ..
shy ..~ ~r .r. y~ ~'C~ '''~ 1: ~ -,~~~~' ~~f~'~F - ~3 i
~~ M ji
x
~ '~` _ s ti 1
~ Y. 5~ Y - ~ ~ ~ F
t
js
r ~ '~
1.
..~.- , ~`
-~ `
~~ ' ~ ~ ~~
~
. .
` ,`
~
~C o
N 'r
e
d
a
d
a
O
N
ti
'~
0
•~
N
.N
V
•~
O
`ly
b
0
W
~"
1~1
.~
C~
.~
w
A
~ a
C
7
LL
3
v 0
~
Z
~ ~
~ ~ = O
a.
Z
o ~ z
a m
c C7
o z a
v
~ F
N
N
U
m
M
.~.:
a
r% J U
0 0
0
o Q 3
~ H
O ~
O C
~ N N
a
o ~ 2
ik ~.+~
~°~' ac a
a d ;~
~ O
3
U a ~
a
0
m ~
rn
c rn
a n
a> "
N U
N
N
d U
C
O ~ Q
z ~ z
~_
O ~ -_ d
~ d 1~ w
~ r oo a`
O O
= a a a
~ °o °o
), N N_
U v `n
_ o
M ~ ~
O
c v
.y ~ ~
c
w c
0
N
l4
~ _O
~ N
Z ~
O M O
w
E a
m
a ~
C a0+ ~
O c~ U
~ o
3 0
O ~
0
~ °' s °1
w~
~OrnaNi~oi.c
a ~ ~n > > 'a
N C`7- O~ N
NUm ~ aN N
O C ~ a ~
~ `~a a3~o0 0
~ ~ c
a d d N t v
~ ~ o 'w c •~ '3 N
c ~~ a~~ ~ ~
mw ~°ca~
~ a ~^_ `~ ~
~~ «°- 3 ac
N p l9 ~- O N O
O N~ N _N O N N N
Z ~ ~ a~ ~ > otS ~
(/~ p> M O N a O
C l0 U~ O O- ~ c O
~ y 0 3 U f6 O N
4 IL-~~ w a~ E c
N
aci
E
.~
N
L
U
(6
d (0
~ 3
7
a m°
m
}
O
7 a
m G
v~
Q z°rn
`o
U
a~
O
N
C
N
N N
d
O N O O
Z y Z Z
a
m
Q
7
a
w
0
v d o
C ~ N
(C ~
C ~
W
C Q1 '-
•~ L
~ fn
i
n Y:k
(Q
j d
~ C I',S
e~ m
N Q '«
~ ~ .a
3
p
W
rn
I ~
3
fD
R
Z Z ~
m m m
N
O
(7
0
~~ o ~
W
c
O
o ~
~ ~
3 ~
N
O
3
(D
~J
CD
C
m
m
~ N N N O C O 7 Q
p 41 O ~ ~ ~ ~ N O
_3 ~'O O ~JnN ~
O a y O W~~ ~_ Z
N (p ~ O (%1 ~ N O CD
~ 'y0 O M A N N O N
(Q ~ N n x ~ O
N _
(gyp j~N~N~~N
O H
N~ ~~ O O N
N ~ y O(D~
~ sN m m~ F-a
o p v~~ a~ m
N
z ~ ~ 7 ~ _. 3
~ N ~ S O N
(D O ~ > (7 N
a~° c° ~ vii ~ a
~ a
~ ~ n ~ v O ~
_ s
CD ~ N ~
O
C=D
Efl Q
O t
°o ~.
n y O ',' ?„ '9 (7
O
~ y
~ ~
> '. =
> O
~ O
3
m ~ ro v
~ ~ ' w
fD ~ ~ c
3 ^~
O ~ Z '~. C O N
O Z1 a ~ O
~O (n ~ O
N
CD
', '~ CO
j O
o O
=
y
<
' ~ o
7
d N
~
7
', i O
lD ~' ~ '
'
a ~
0
O A 'I
o _
? ~ '
N
N
`~ ' I
~
D .9
~ ~ ~ c ~
'Y
O O O ~-
I
~ a a ~ '
~ G'
t
i~ i i cn
v o O ~ ' w
N
~ .Oi
d N
'6
A
' n
W
~p N
~ O N
d
~
_
O
7
M
Z -I Z
D m ~
~ ~
~ CD
]J N
O
n C
~
7c
.-. N
fD
v a
~
~ ~
co
; ~
-i
to
c -` A
d ~i A ~ 7
~ ~
a
0 3
o ^'
3
!~? Z
(D
O
T
C
7
G
'~ .. ..
O O
',j ~ Z
~ ~
~ ~
A
i
d
n,
^:
a~
'S
`1
.7_
~~
0
y
A
'~
L
W
ti
°o
b
b w
A '~
6~ o0
~ v
n Z Z N
~ ~
' > > c ~
j a ~
~ m m m
~
~
ro ~
Q
~ _
~
N
N
O .
~
~
n
C
3 a
p
m v' Z D
CD (f] 0 N
~
C ~
~~ ~
3 ,,
(D
i
rn
N
~
O
N m
~ -~
N
O
m
m
m
~ p -~ D
_. fD _3 a
O ~ m Q
~ ~ N p
Z7 (~ d ~
• o °-'
3 v Z
3 0
v~o ~°
`° m. ~
~o-
m
~~~
m ~.
<d
N
O ~
,m
m ~
~ r.
m N
c
o a
sQ
m ,~
3
CD ~
0
m
e» O
O
O ~
O fl-
ncnO ,~~ ~n
> c
> m
~
3
,. ~ ' ~ m ~
v
m ~
3 d .o
-~
3
^~ ~ ~
o ~ p
Z I, c
' ~ o
o
o
~ ~ a
N jV
~ ~
~ ~
v 3
' ~
~ O
fD
I -1
N
~ ~
O ~ O
CC ~ ~ O
m ~
m ~'
~
;
m 4 y
C. ~
~ O
~ ~,
',I
O A ~
N N `~ 'I
0
° 0
° = n r
° N
w co ,~ 'i ~ as
~
D
O O O ~
^.
a
N
lA
N
- O
fop ,~.' N
' N
~
N m
= a
~ cn
A ,. m
M N O i
3 °' ~
m
z z z
D D ~
m
N
C
N~
CD
o-
o 'i
c -~ ~
~
a .i~
.. z
O o
W ~
m m
a
0 3
o
N Z
CD
O ~
cn-~~
m N
z
.A ~]
z ,
~ i
A
G
T
c
a
d
...
n
..r
`C
D_
O
^S
0
a
n
a
ti
N
0
A
ti
N
~ a
^~
ti H
Parcel #: 020-1010-00-000
01/13/2009 03:06 PM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel #: 10.29.19.41A 020 -TOWN OF HUDSON
Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O =Current Owner, C =Current Co-Owner
O -STATE OF WISCONSIN, D N R
D N R STATE OF WISCONSIN
101 S WEBSTER BOX 7921
MADISON WI 53707
Districts: SC =School SP =Special Property Address(es): ' =Primary
Type Dist # Description
SC 2611 HUDSON
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 38.560 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 10 T29N R19W NW SW EXC PARCEL Block/Condo Bldg:
406,41 B
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
10-29N-19W
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
07/23/1997 728/83-
~nns2 ci innnneQV Bill #: Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
-- - - - - ------ -- - - 0
Valuations: Last Changed: 08/23/1995
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
STATE X2 38.560 0 0 0 NO
Totals for 2008:
General Property 0.000 0 0 0
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2007:
General Property 0.000 0 0 0
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch #:
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Tota I 0.00 0.00 0.00
PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM
INSPECTION REPORT FOR WILLOW
RIVER STATE PARK ENTRANCE &
VISITORS STATION
Name Willow River State Park
Address 1034 Cty Hwy A
city Hudson
State & Zip WI 54016
GENERAL INFORMATION
CST BM Elev.: 921.9' Insp. BM Elev.: 925.0'
BM Description FFE Visitor's station
TANK INFORMATION
TYPE ..MANUFACTURER CAPACITY
septic Wieser 1645 gal
Dosing na
Filter PolyLok PL 550
TANK SETBACK INFORMATION
TYPE P/L WELL BLDG VENT TO
AIR INTAKE
Septic >2' 62'
Dosing
Holding
PUMP/SIPHON INFORMATION
Manufacturer na
Model number na
Lift Friction
Loss System
Head TDH
Ft.
Forcemain Length Dia. Dist. to Well
SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM
Property
Address
City 1034 Cty Hwy A
Hudson, WI 54016
Town of Hudson
Legal SE, NE, 9, 29, 19W
Subdivision na - ~
CSM # na
Sanitary perrnit# 360210
State Plan ID # 1543971
Parcel tax# na ~~;
Computer # na
Nuv u ; ZD08
ST. CROIX COUNTY
ELEVATION DATA ZONING OFFICE
STATION ELEVATION ELEVATION
Benchmark 925:00'
Well
Bldg. Sewer 922.40'
St/Ht Inlet 922.35'
SbHt outlet 921.82'
Dt. inlet
Dt. Bottom
Header/Man.
Dist. pipe 917.51'
Bottom system 916.68'
CO #3 919.10'
Final Grade 921.46'
Bed/trench dimensions Width 4 ft Length, 72 ft No. of Trenches 3
Setback Type of System : P/L Bldg V1/e11 Lake/Stream
Information Conventional > 5 ft 260 ft 300 ft > 50 ft
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Header/Manifold I Distribution pipe(s) I X Hole Size I X Hole Spacing
D. Box Dia. 4 in. Outlets Length 70 ft . Dia. 4 in Spacing na na na
COMMENTS: 1) Well not installed but location marked. 2) Tank and piping to CO #2 backfilled prior to inspection.
Uncovered inlet/outlet for inspection. 3) Soil absorption cell location set by surveyor. 4) Tank size, outlet filter model and
absorption cell depth are acceptable. 5) Needs CO sleeves and pads, DB cover and glue filter to outlet pipe.
Plan revisions required? _ yes X no 11/5/08 ~;~~ O 71599
date nspect s Slgn~@ure Cert. No.
~3 ~ `~
G~ j • ~ ~
~- ~ ~ vP Ss" Ik
~s F- ~ ~ "~ n`1 ~? ~' ~ c11 ~ to
t
r / 3 r
`Z `~ U 2 _ t` ` ~''
1 J ~( 2 3 e.
~ _ ~~ ~ g ~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <ti ~
~ - ~ { `
o_ m4.1~~
v ~ ~ ~ ~.
J
Q~ ~t Z
~~.?~- ~
/ ---{~-/ :~ ~ o
/ ~/LJ
a
i
r
~f
~ ! ~
,~ ~ ~
J ~ .,. f!`
M `lg ~ Q. V
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ s
J ~ ~ ~ 2 C
d CL v
t~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,~ ~ ~ r~l
`~ ~
~'~, ~' ~ s
;.~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ _ m Q ~
~ M
J ~- ~ y
~ ~ (r
3 1~~ u '~
fi~L ~ ~ ~ ~•1-. ' i
~' V ~' ~ ~n , \ ~'-
x z -- iz ~
~\ ~~ ~~4 \
\ ~ ~~
\~ \ ~ '~~- ~ a.
commerce.wi.gov
~ ^
isconsin
Department of Commerce
Q COPY
Safety and Buildings
PO BOX 7162
MADISON WI 53707-7162
TDD #: (608) 264-8777
www. com me rc e. wi . go v/s b/
www.wisconsin.gov
Jim Doyle, Governor
Jack L. Fischer, A.I.A., Secretary
June 25, 2008
CUST ID No. 943108
RICK APFEL
AYRES ASSOCIATES INC
1802 PANKRATZ ST
MADISON WI 53704-4069
CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 06/25/2010
SITE:
Willow River State Park - 3 POWTS
1034 County Highway A
Town of Hudson, 54016
A7TN: POWTS /nspector
ZONING OFFICE
ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA
1101 CARMICHAEL RD
HUDSON WI 54016
Identification Numbers
Transaction ID No. 1543971
Site ID No. 738503
Please refer to both identification numbers,
above, in all corres ondence with the agency.
St Croix County
SE1/4, NE1/4, S9, T29N, R19W
FOR:
Description: Visitors Station /Non-Pressurized In-Ground
Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1186074
Maintenance required; 600 GPD Flow rate; 108 in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade;
System(s): Conventional POWTS Component Manual, SBD-10567-P (R.6/99); Commercial System
Description: Shower/Bestroom Facility /Pressurized In-Ground
Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1188398
Maintenance required; 2,205 GPD Flow rate; 70 in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade;
System(s): Conventional POWTS Component Manual, SBD-10567-P (R.6/99), Pressure Distribution Component
Manual, SBD-10573-P (R.6/99); Commercial System
Description: Restroom Facility /Pressurized In-Ground
Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1188399
Maintenance required; 1,305 GPD Flow rate; 70 in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade;
System(s): Conventional POWTS Component Manual, SBD-10567-P (R.6/99), Pressure Distribution Component
Manual, SBD-10573-P (R.6/99); Commercial System
The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes
and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This,system is to be constructed
and-located"iii accorda~ice with the enclosed appcaved plans and with the,component manuals referenced-above: The
owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code
requirements.
No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per s.145.06,
stats.
The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use:
~- This approval is for three POWTS serving state-owned buildings, structures or facilities. A Sanitary
Permit must be obtained from the Department for each POWTS prior to commencement of
construction. For more information on how to obtain a Sanitary Permit, please contact Vicky
Brennan at (920)492-5601. Otherwise you may download a Sanitary Permit Application at
RICK APFEL
Page 2 6/25/2008
www.commerce.state.wi.us/SB/SB-DivForms.html and mail with the fee of $200 for each POWTS to
the following address:
Wisconsin Department of Commerce
Attn: Vicky Brennan
2331 San Luis Place
Green Bay, WI 54304.
A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to
inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. All permits
required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of
construction/installation/operation.
In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should
conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review
shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building; structure, or component.
Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address
on this letterhead.
The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter to the owner and any others who are responsible for the
installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS.
Sincerely,
Peter E Pagel
Private Sewage Plan Reviewer ,Integrated Services
(608)266-2889 , M - F, 0630 - 1500 Hrs
pete.pagel @ wisconsin.gov
Fee Required $ 675.00
Fee Received $ 675.00
Balance Due $ 0.00
WSMART code: 763.3
cc: Leroy G Jansky, POWTS Wastewater Specialist, (715) 726-2544 ,Friday, 7:00 A.M. To 3:30 P.M.
m
a
m
A
f0
(O
.T7
A
f~D
C
z
n
O
z
C
C~
0
z
0
<~
W
r
m
~ ~
O
2
m
O
D
O
O
z
z~
z
m
r
oC
1"rl
__
~
'~ z O
w
~
~.
`{
O `
ti ~ rn~
W
O
t
r
O
C~
c
O
_<
Cn
O
z
m
C~
z
n
a
r
O
C~
D
0
rS
n ~~
~e
5'
~ ~` s~ m o m ~ a m o '^~ ~ o Q ~° d
..
3 Q
m ~ `°
°+ n m
o
(9 ,~ U N 7 '~. d N N 7 cSD S (D ~ N
°'o
m m
' m mm
~ 3~
~ ~'-o.H ~a ~n~ C7
e
7
(D
Ol
O_-° m e
-o =
o ~ o_-
m
m
m d
-m
`D O
y o
D
7
d 7' ~,
O '~ o
7 C m-< m
^ S
"C
~ N
N~ O
0
3 0 m
7~ ~
~ :: p
o;~ ~
a H- ~o m
s
~
~
do
3~0~° o
~-~ a
»
~ 31
.
om ter. -? mgr. ~ ~tD ~
~~ ~ N~ ~ ~saH d a7 ~
<s ,~~ o~ 7 oa<
c 7
- -
~•d~ tWji
d~ ~~ c~
~ o am
<o <
S (D
0
0 `~
:-.3
a
s~ < N 'O
~
n
3
., ~ m " m m ° ~ a
~
-' ~ ~
-•
l m
-, .o O
~ :gym m~
- Q~N
m ~
- n"~ Z
0 7 ~ c
~~ m N N
~* D a~ ~ °
~ Q ~ o Z
m _ ,d
~' Q
H
2 6
H m
O f/1
7
m t0
c m
ma
< 7 S~
o_m a
~
m
a l O
~
~
~
D
o ~ , ~
7 d
tD d `
J 3 3 c ~ ~~
o D c .°t y
_
.. m m ~ ~ ~,
~~
~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ N 7
o m ~•o ~ ~ ~~m ~ o
~ N
?
N _
~i m
N ~' 3
+ - o'
J 7 °
7•
N
rT~
~~
a
~v
W
C7
O
c
z
Z
Q
W
0
N
a--a
0
C0
-• rn
Safety and Buildings Division
201 W. Washington Avc., P.O. Box 7162
I C~O~ C~~ Madison, Wl 53707 - 7162
_ Oe art7ment of Com•7merce (608) 266-3151
State Sanitary Permit Application
In accord with Comm 83.21, Wis. Adm. Code, personal information you provide
may be used Cor secondary puiposes Privacy Law, s 15.04(1 xm)
I. Application information -Please Print All Information
Property Owner's Name
C
Propcny Owner's Mailing Address
O~ C~~ °~ti~-~l
City, Sutc '~~ ~Z-i-p~C~odc~l \Ph~one Numbcr <~ ~7
I1. Type of Building (check all that apply)
^ I or 2 Family Dwelling -Number oC Bedrooms
~ ^ PubliclComrncrcial -Describe Use p
~tate Owned - Describe Usc ~~-~-~~~1\~~~~ti1~
III. Type of~ermit: (Check o _' ' ;` ''"'iine A. Complete line B if applicable)
County . .
r~-t-, -
Sanitary Permit Numbcr (to be filled in by Co.)
:, 3~D~1 D
State Plan I.D. Numbcr
Project Address (if different than mailing address)
Parcel X Lot H Block X
Property Locatiocn G(f ~ Z ~-~~t° . ~ ~ L
~~ r/,, (~C~ '/., Section C~
~~
(circle one)
T ~ N; R~_E or~
Subdivision Name CSMr Number
^Ciry_^Villagc Bfownshipof
~mS~~ -
A' ew System ^ Replacement System ^ Treatment/Holding Tank Replacement Only ^ Other Modification to Existing System
B• ^ Permit Renewal ^ Pcrrnit Revision ^ Change of ^ Permit Transfer to Ncw Ust Previous Permit Number and Date Issued
Before Expiation Plumber Owner
T e of POWTS S stem: Check all that a
V
l I
~
~
I I~ Non -Prusuriud Iri-!found ^ Mound > 24 in. of suitable soil ^ Mound < 24 in. of suitable soil ^ At-Grade ^ Single Pass Sand Filter ^
Constructed Wetland ^ Pressuriud (n-Ground ^ cat Unit ^ Rccir~ taring Sapd Fi1tc
~ 7
G~~~
Recirculating Synthetic Media Filter Leaching Chamber ^ Drip Line ^ Gravei-less Pipe ^ Other (explain) (nom/. '
V. Dis ersal/I'reatment Area Informs ton:
Design flow (gpd) Design Soil Application Rate(gpds() Dispersal Arw Required (s() Dispersal Area Proposed (s() System Elevation
VI. Tank Info Capacity in Total Number Manufacturer Prefab Site Steel Fiber plastic
Gallons Gallons of Units Concrete Constructed Glass
~
~ Ncw Existing
/
~ Tanks Tacks
Scp_~or Holding Tank f ~~
/S ~
~i/efs ~~ C~-~.~~f
~/
Aerobic Treatment Unit
Dosing Clutrtbcr
VII. Responslbil(ty Statement- I, the undersigned, assume responsibility Cor Installatloo of the PORrI'S shown on the attached plans. ~
Plumber's Name (Print) Plumber's 'natur MP/MPRS Number Business Phone Numbcr
e%L%~
i
ry, State, Z~ ode)
Plumber's Address (Street, C
r
^
~'
C~~~ ~~' .1 \~~ ~\ ~ (~ 1, ~ !~ ~r~-
~~ U ~ ~ (115 ~`~ \ '`L r- ~~- I ~J
VIII. Coun /De artment Use Onl
Approved
^ Disapproved Sanitary Permit Fc includes Groun water
Surch ~J~M ~Q
~ Dat Issu d
/ /
O
~ D~ Issu ng A eat Signs re (No Stamps)
~j~
•
^ Owner Given Reason (or Denial QS(..[%
l /
! (/
IX. Conditions of ApprovaVReasons for Disappro va
~
Please contact Waste Water `
` ~ ~(~ ~ o~ ,~d ~!/~/~%4~~
Specialist Leroy Jansky at r ~ , ~ ~t ~~ d, ~ ~ ~.~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~
/ 1'- J GU~G,'f'~F tui- ills tu~fJCi.uvu V t d t 1 ~ . v ~ - r - -
AUxh congdN< pens (lu Urr Cuuntp onl~~) (ur Ihr tvNrrn on paprr not Irtt Than NIR < I t Inchrt in titr
L
lip ~a~ ~o nr,L ub: 52i YAX f3U8 Ltf4 8795
~~;~.I
I~OV-@5-2@
$t
~- o~ ro ,p~ --~
~ ,_.-.. _, sic
Jo R ._-~---~ ~,
~-- ~.~ /off' .~/1~ ~~ .~
`` s ~. ~!~ ~ s -
- - --~ - s
~ {
"--~.~ --~~ ~ f'If Gmnnd TlkbSq flfy~. ~~'^'
r-~_.-..-_ -.. 4
C0~[3iE17CE SBtB PDB i~j 001
r ~ .-
,~,r:~msr~~w`,~~>~`°~ `a say. ~va~u~Tra~a r~~~a~T / ~
~A~ _.... M -_
in accadancc.a~pt Cornrn E5, wb. AtJm. Code
nn:~r, Gtr+~Ckrr -fM ~+:nr :., ~^rv:+ rrPt hFS nan n rn Y r s h Caorriy ,r„! f ~ G/r'dP j~.
indrrtl, bttl nel ar~n d+es In size. r'bn rmnl
hMQ9rf si Qfl h: wanrar arpi trorrsgrl.~r iCi.srnc~ ry~Nr1 IHMj~ d4n~HOn +rd •, .
ais, sdk a ril,ry!r~grer_ na.lr wntrvv. mnd fotalror, nrhi dJFfan~ b rrc#est roatl. >'arce11.0.
f~leasen:irtf »flintarmattvn, Rtrvkwed 55'
r•,~,,,,,~ Uaie
,~ iM ..c,nan yaa r+m~rAe rwnr M ese~ kr rft,,.da,7 I~ry~s
~^l~j,~,~ f"~rrr~r~.,.re.alnprr~. !-
~~ ! ~ fah
~~ ~ /acn ~2,~y~~rss T~7~' p~l~ __... Ga~l.ld 57+ u~ ~wsre s f ~ 7 ~'9 of ~ aE (arlw
_ y ~ ~o_ ,~ ~~~ ur
r'rY i 'Ia1~21R COrrrr 1Me: Hrm ~/~
/{T'L3`9~v l~l/. Sh~dr~ i'J/~ ~~y Ea~io ~ town I+ea,esr I~o~-
fJawCtxr:i~UCilon Use;(,J ncAkiur,WArMr '~
~ »1!1 9i Urdloar~ Cad! derWed C~tprt nrn. telB
f_) eAZicemeni ~ r~ a ca*mcdrA _ -^- , S3pb
T`~mlrrnrnrhl besor6t ~LW E•u T/~ ~-~~
C,..rvtrnr ra.nrgidS ~~r- .. •~~f I~ovd MoAn ~tR+~'dNm R a1mr~C,il,la __~ _ h_
a.~.- recammnndartorP; rlfsT lt~.4S'~ . ~ ~%ila r sr~r ~oA~r
~i °~it*' ~7 citJ/Tif.6 /~ f 9iP ..gam I.VS'fF'OU.C!J.7 ~~7~~~t1T/6~!/fL~
P~%sYs ~~-'~ ~s•~rr 'l3;aa;~Fv.r~ • errs .
Cl ~n~ !;
Hmhyi R / ~ ~a rt. oq,nr ro MMgrrg racror ~~~~ ~~ --
. / ~ t'li Cyothrd 5rxrfry! N•.v. In
Q\ I lrnlaon perylh L~ar.lv,m,1 Cafw fiedn,r [tearsh~(oo 7~ ~ ~Fpp~~n (isle
ij in kkax~ c~.. st_ cord. Caoz
~ I pro ra y,~ ~j`z_ --~--~
EtRtrenl d I = BOUs ~ 30 < 2z0 tgtll-turd iSS .an . rrn.......
Dcos, MnmlOmYarw~~/~ .._
~~ ~IG/~El~. ~ ~ .
• PD]`A....'~s'~ °>~• /,~' /d~lS
/~' ~'O~.,Qt,+_'J-r~~t'L_ ~rduSC..7t'U!f-ir 1 C~~
rCSJ'I;~~,¢T~~ °~ /o,D °U/3i,7G+~S ~~ Hefare local zoning perrrdts Can be
~-~ett - TMlS PROJECT V1rlt1.
REQt1lfIE STATE i.EVEL Rk.Aril
APPi~OVA~. Plans will neerr to be
su>xr~edCamm S ~~(C~ignerPer
2(Sr;vrr- yftii, iPEST ~11~~ -
{,,~,~
CO~r~ (. ~~'D't? ~' r~~ZS
I ~
78 @6:34AM From: 6@8 264 8795 ID:DCOM SAFETY~BUILDINC~
auo srn+dute
~. Sz Sh. CorzSivlence nonndary Roots rpDJS+ ...`
'E[IA 1 ~ rEppz
'- l~f'sb~'
a fsh~ ~-fR
.r.-~h' w
~'S 3
a f _ ~
s
. ~
~~
~- ~~" .mot ~ r2.S / _ ..~ , ~
>
r~ _,
_d
.~
• ~ f
Page:@@1 P=95
-~, ~~, y r+LL v~• u~ rnn ouo coo tsra5 C:U~IERCE S&B PDB f~002
WI//a~
. rrnhrnrr ~ f~--
r-~tv
'
lreshry !
L
J
~rb'P
~~ ~~~ 1'arCl1 tU A
Isralrt~, f~
77
~~
~i
,6L111 WOtINd~Irelrev, ~rr~p
-
~
"•
~''Q~r+glaalor>1/S'
- c~~,n,
~ ~
- I~ ~ I~IR ~jCAf~thprfn
1NIVnsail Qe. SZ. Corr Apr
T~`~Irt • -
ShICIIRb
~ ~.
ConBlsEprC4
9d1r~
~" 7' r'~ /~ -~' Gi
~ Z~ a iL ,f~ ,tiyrFn k
~'
'i.`cA'- S ~
.~ ~~ .S/ ~ .... ad
~ i
_ C
aa+.r so ri,~nnq Tador .~• fd~ rti
~a~i
r~
-~~Z
~rrt~q ~
~~,
}a~ ~
'
~ ~
~~-~
~ Z k~+l
ztm {
~
' ` 7.9
{l J ~
7~
f
~'rnmd aMEtCt c~e~. / !• / n ~/
~t'Ih 1° ~+
+!
t s~
„~"rT,sd~i~~/~'}'' `d y~...
r ~`
Ttr+ txm --~.--.
C~ R"`~` 1kna4rlb
t ecia.
O
~ ~ r
^_
~- ~lunsell
~~. .
T~r~ Si Cant
~ Tc:hne ,~ ~ :~oA ~~ Ilan (~
? - ' ~.~@ ~~ ~ SlG J!"s/~r~ ~m~,s' ~ 'Exi-t 'E~m
5iL ~ }~ n,~rF,e c ~ ~ • S
o~ f~ ~~, .
NOU-05-2E
. -__ ..Y.. acv r~>~ ! 1$Q 11~ -
r-m'*r+ rt - eoo.~ ~ n~NL z,~a Tss ~ ao a,q,~
'11tr f )cQnt!^ rJ , e~al rir~~ k ah ttpnin~r,rlnneY ~++rice Qrorilkr ~rrt1 e t ,
~ t+llcrn^tc iatm~t~ Clc~c ~+1aN fire ~ t'1'~• If ~
:rM, •+. tkparhnat a! G ~ elet;d aetrxloe~e In aec*aa srrv~ +n
'"~ ~r dS-26G-3151 or ~1'{•Y G08-2 G~ •8777.
A ~~ ~4 ~~ ~~~j~~
' ~Qd f~i'Si fo,Q„~ ~!J/%+~~' 7~1dG1~ 1~ir¢Jf,~ ~--
O~v~r rN ~J-jta" D~3'iZ7~_ ~ ~{7 D ~+}~,5• x 3 S -
~$^~ ~S. XIS- r~~ _ ~~5.
_~
108 O6:35AM From: 608 z64 8795 ID:DC~M SAFETY&BUILDING Pa9e:OO2 R=95%
T'qp~ ~ o/
'>ri1IT 'e(~
.~ f . 5 . ,4ti'
-7
nn,ir,p rr ^ n~r~,Q C~'~j
rn Grtrard . elev. J! . rJ
1~ l,.i.__-T .- - - -.- ~.
' 11/U~/Utf 4Yr;~1 ufj:UU FAX 608 264 8795 COMMERCE S&B PDB
_ ~~ ~"„ ~ ifs'.
~ ~ ~
~ g
j ~ .
m
z
~ qq~
~ V N
b ~ ~
z~ .~~a _~~~ ~
~ ` ~ ~~ x ~
~~~ !~ a o~~ ~~
~ e~ ~ ~
~ ~~a~~ti
~~
~. W ~~
Z 4 ~
~ ~ ~
n~~
~r
4~
p ~ ~
~ q ~~~
I~ ~ ~ a ..
~~ ~
~ ~ ~ `~ ~.J
V ~~ ~m m~
~~ r ~ ~-aS
m
n ~m~
~a~z
a~~
~~`"~ ~ ..
z ~~ p~ q
~ ~ Q ~
-7
~~~ ~ a
ro
}~. ~
~ ~
~ ~
~9
~~~•
~,-a
(_ i...
~ `~ ~ ~
L, ~ ~ ~ ~
p ~ , ~ ~ q„~
{`~ ~
~: ar- ~d
.4
.` -q ~ ~ ~ `
rJ
~ ~
N -~ ~
~` `~ Q
Q
I ` ,~ w
I ~ ~ I ~ _
' ~ I ~~ ~~ ~
r ~ ~ a. .q
~ ~
'~ ~ +
f
~ ~. T-_ ~
7 ~ ~- ~-'-- ~ b
-... _ _ ~ \
M
"~~~
hdOU-05-2008 O6:35AM From: 608 264 8795
X001
_.~~~
ID:DCOM SAFETY&BUILDIhdG P.~ae:OO3 R=95%
Parcel #: 020-1008-00-000 11/10/2008 04:16 PM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel #: 09.29.19.25 020 -TOWN OF HUDSON
Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O =Current Owner, C =Current Co-Owner
O -STATE OF WISCONSIN, D N R
D N R STATE OF WISCONSIN
101 S WEBSTER BOX 7921
MADISON WI 53707
Districts: SC =School SP =Special Property Address(es): * =Primary
Type Dist # Description
SC 2611 HUDSON
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 40.000 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 09 T29N R19W SE NE Block/Condo Bldg:
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
09-29N-19W
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # VollPage Type
2008 SUMMARY Bill #: Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
0
Valuations: Last Changed: 08/23/1995
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
STATE X2 40.000 0 0 0 NO
Totals for 2008:
General Property 0.000 0 0 0
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2007:
General Property 0.000 0 0 0
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch #:
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parcel #: 020-1008-00-000
12/12/2008 04:19 PM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel #: 09.29.19.25 020 -TOWN OF HUDSON
Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O =Current Owner, C =Current Co-Owner
O -STATE OF WISCONSIN, D N R
D N R STATE OF WISCONSIN
101 S WEBSTER BOX 7921
MADISON WI 53707
Districts: SC =School SP =Special Property Address(es): ' =Primary
Type Dist # Description
SC 2611 HUDSON
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 40.000 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 09 T29N R19W SE NE Block/Condo Bldg:
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
09-29N-19W
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
2008 SUMMARY Bill #: Fair Market Value:
0 Assessed with:
Valuations: Last Changed: 08/23/1995
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
STATE X2 40.000 0 0 0 NO
Totals for 2008:
General Property 0.000 0 0 0
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2007:
General Property 0.000 0 0 0
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch #:
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 1 of 1
Jennifer Shillcox
From: Jennifer Shillcox
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 10:20 AM
To: 'riched@dnr.state.wi.us'
Cc: Kevin Grabau; David Fodroczi; Ryan Yarrington; Alex Blackburn; Pam Quinn; Becky Eggen
Subject: Willow River State Park
Hi Darrel,
Thanks for your call last week. Ryan Yarrington informed me that he talked to you regarding planned
improvements at Willow River State Park. I have tried calling you back several times but always get a double busy
signal, so I am sending this a-mail as a follow-up.
As we discussed when I met you at a hearing last January, our staff would be happy to meet with you once the
plans for the park have been finalized (it sounds like they have) to determine what, if any, County permits will be
necessary. Unfortunately, this is my last week at work before starting maternity leave and I will be tied up with our
monthly Board of Adjustment hearing preparations and finishing up other projects. I am copying this message to
Kevin Grabau, Code Administrator. I recommend that you contact him directly to schedule a meeting to review
your plans. You can call the main number (715-386-4680) and ask to be directed to his line. He was out last week
but will be back in the office tomorrow. I will fill him in on the details when I see him.
Sincerely,
Jenny Shillcox
Land Use Specialist
7/21 /2008
State of Wisconsin \ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
WISCONSIN ~_
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Februaxy 06, 2007
Ms. Jenny Shillcox
1101 Carmichael. Road
Hudson, WI 54016
Subject: Willow River State Park Campground Development
Dear Ms. Jenny Shiilcox:
Willow River State Park
1034 County Trunk A
Hudson, Wisconsin 54016
Telephone 715-386-5931
FAX 715-386-0431
TTY Access via relay - 711
In December of 1984, the Department of Natural Resources approved a Master Plan and Environmental
Assessment for the continued operation and development of Willow River State Park. The Master Plan
called for the development of an additional 80 unit campground for the park to be located on what has
become known as Site 1. The campground development project has since been funded. As plans for the
campground were being developed and made public, several concerns about site 1 were raised and the
Department needed to again evaluate alternative sites. Since the campground design and location will
deviate from the original concept, and because several years have elapsed. since the concept was first
proposed in the Master Plan, the Department issued a news release to local media on December 07, 2006.
The purpose of the news release was to describe the new project and solicit additional public comments.
The closing date for public comment was January 24, 2007. Thirty seven people, including yourself,
provided oral or written comments. Copies of the comment record are available at the DNR West Central
Region Headquarters.
All comments received were considered. Based on some of the concerns raised, changes to the
Environmental Assessment were warranted. The summary of issues and concerns presented below is
considered an addendum to the Environmental Assessment for this proposal.
SITE LOCATION:
The majority of the comments received expressed a preference for the combination sites 3 & 5 (near the
park entrance and near the present park office). Respondents strongly expressed opposition to locating
any more camping near the main use areas of the park. The Department has decided to develop the
combination sites 3 & 5.
OPPOSITON TO ADDITIONAL CAMPING:
Several respondents questioned or were opposed to any additional camping at Willow River State Park.
The majority did express support for the project at the combination sites.
MINIMAL IMPACT ON PARK FLORA AND FAUNA:
Many respondents expressed concern about the impact of an 80 unit campground on the native plants and
animals of the park. The majority of the respondents expressed that the combination sites achieved that
goal. Both sites are on previously disturbed lands. The endangered plant species located in a small patch
near site 5 is away from the actual construction area and will be protected.
Jim Doyle, Governor
Scott Hassett, Secretary
Scott Humrickhouse, Regional Director
RECEIVED
FEB 1 6 2007
ST. CROIX COUNTY
dnr.wi.gov Quality Natural Resources Management
wisconsin.gov Through Excellent Customer Service Printed°^
Recycled
Paper
goal. Both sites are on previously disturbed Iands. The endangered plant species located in a small patch
near site 5 is away from the actual construction area and will be protected.
EFFECTS OF CAMPGROUND. SEPTIC SYSTEMS ON SURFACE AND GROUND WATER:
Several respondents were concerned about the effects of the pazk's septic systems on surface and ground
waters of the park. Sites 3 & 5 provide more distance from surface waters than other alternative sites. All
new septic systems will be located in azeas that will be properly tested and will be designed and
constructed meeting all applicable regulations.
VISUAL SCREENING OF THE CAMPGROUND:
Several respondents expressed that the campers. using the campground on the combination site will be
highly visible from County Road A, the park entrance road, and park neighbors. Many expressed that
trees be planted as soon as possible to provide a visual and sound screening of the campground. The
Department is committed to accelerated planting to screen the affected areas.
With these additions, and having received no evidence that the Environmental Assessment was
inadequate, we have certified the amended document and proposed action to be in compliance with state
law (Section 1.1.1, Wis. Statutes). This certification means that the Department has fulfilled the legally
established procedural requirements for the environmental review and public disclosure. Should you
disagree with that conclusion, you may appeal this certification.
If you believe you have a right to appeal this decision, you should know that Wisconsin Statutes and
Administrative Codes establish time periods within which requests to review Department decisions must
be filed. For judicial review of a decision such as this you have 30 days after service of the decision
(same date this notification is mailed) to file your petition for review. The respondent in an action for
judicial review is the Department of Natural Resources. You may wish to seek legal counsel to determine
your specific legal rights fo challenge this decision.
Thank you for submitting your comments to us. Your interest and concern in the campground,
development is appreciated. If you have any questions about the information.presented above, please
contact me at (715)839-3747.
Sincerely,
,~ ~ ~
1 ice,,,,
Tom Lovejoy
Environmental Review Supervisor
cc. Craig Thompson, WCR
Jean Rygiel, WCR
Darrel Richer, Willow River State Park
Jennifer Shillcox
From: Jennifer Shillcox
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 1:00 PM
To: David Fodroczi
Cc: Kevin Grabau
Subject: Willow River State Park -Campground Plans
Hey Dave,
Just thought I'd send you a brief update on the hearing I attended last night regarding the proposed campground
expansion at Willow River State Park.
Currently, the park is looking at adding approximately 80 campsites (camper and/or tent) to meet demand, get rid of some
existing substandard campsites, and implement the park's master plan. Park staff are evaluating three scenarios (Plans A,
Band C), all of which are off of County Highway A near the park entrance (they no longer plan to expand within the
Shoreland District of the Willow River). All plans are in preliminary stages...the park's goal is to construct the sites in spring
2009 once a plan has been finalized. The park also plans to add a new visitor within a year.
I introduced myself to Darrel Richer, project leader, and told him to give us a call once the plans have been finalized to
determine what, if any, County permits may be required. He assured me that they would, and also requested that if anyone
calls with questions on the proposed campground we refer them to him. His contact information:
Darrel Richer, Willow River State Park
(715) 386-5931
richedCa~dnr.state.wi.us
I grabbed some handouts and will start a file in my office. Let me know if you any other questions or concerns
Jenny Shillcox
Land Use Specialist
St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Department
1101 Carmichael Road
Hudson, WI 54016
Phone: 715-386-4682
Fax: 715-386-4686
jennifers(a,co.saint-croix.wi.us
WISCONSIN '~-~-.
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
NEWS :RELEASE
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
West Central Region Service Center
1.300 W. Clairemont Ave.
Eau Claire, WI 54702
FOR RELEASE: December 7, 2006
CC)1o~TACT: Barrel Richer, Team Leader, ~'Villo~w River State Park, Pl~€sne (715) 386-
5331, email: riched@dnr.state.~vi.us
SUBJECT: Willow River State Park Campground Development
Eau Claire, Wis. -The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources is continuing to
implement the Master Plan for Willow River State Park in St. Croix County, Wisconsin. The 1984
Master Plan authorized the development of an 80-unit family campground. The new campground
would also include an .internal road network, pedestrian pathways, drinking water system, pit toilets,
flush toilets/shower building and other amenities. Funding for the project was authorized in 2005 at
$2.8 million.
Conceptual plans approved in 1997 called for the new campground to be located south of the
Willow River and downstream of the Little Falls dam. In early 2006 the Department publicly
announced its intent to prepare detailed design plans for the new campground. Public comments were
received voicing concerns regarding the 1997 approved campground location. In response to those
concerns the Department conducted a re-evaluation of campground siting options at the park. Criteria
considering physical and environmental features and park operational factors were developed to
identify and compare campground location alternatives. Findings of this analysis include identification
of unanticipated safety issues associated with the 1997 preferred site. The report concludes that an
alternative campground location closer to the park entrance best meets the siting criteria.
Relocating the proposed campground closer to the park entrance is not anticipated to result in
significant adverse environmental effects. The Department has made a preliminary determination that
neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement will be required for this
action.
The Department has scheduled a public meeting from 4:OOpm to 7:OOpm on January 10, 2007 at
Hudson Town Hall, 980 County Road A, to discuss the campground siting re-evaluation and the
proposed new campground location. Copies of the report supporting this action are currently available at
the park or will be mailed to interested parties upon request (contact address, phone or email address
listed below). Public comments, either written or oral, are welcome and must be received by the
Department no later than 4:30 p.m., January 24, 2007. Comments should be directed to Mr. Darrel
Richer, Team Leader, Willow River State Park, 1034 County Road A, phone (715) 3.86-5931, email
address ricked@dnr.state.wi.us
Willow River State Park Campground Alternatives Analysis
December, 2006
Purpose and Need, Project History
Since the 1980's, demand for~family campsites at Willow River State Park has exceeded
the 78 sites currently provided. All sites are filled on each weekend (99.1 % occupancy)
during the summer camping season, while a comparable number of potential campers are
turned away. According to data from the statewide reservation system, Willow River has
the second highest rate of camper "turn-aways" in Wisconsin. In response to that
demand, The Department of Natural Resources (Department} is planning to develop
approximately 80 new campsites in addition to the existing 78 campsites cun-ently
available at Willow River State Park. Expansion of camping facilities at Willow River
will provide more opportunities for family camping and boost tourism dollars brought
into Wisconsin. Campground revenue also contributes to statewide park operation. funds.
The need for the proposed campground was identified in the cun-ent park Master Plan
(approved in 1984). Conceptual development plans were approved in 1997, and $2.8
million of funding was authorized by the Wisconsin Building Commission and approved
by Governor Doyle in 2005. The approved project calls for a Unitized Campground,-
defined as a facility that provides one campsite, designed for use by tent, trailer, or other
camping vehicle, for each camping party.
Although the Master Plan and campground concept were approved years ago, the need
for additional camping capacity at Willow River has not diminished, and in fact has
increased since those approvals. While waiting for funds to be allocated, the campground
proposal was refined to address facility, site and program parameters. When funds were
secured, the Department publicly announced its intent to proceed with detailed design
work and subsequent development. Shortly thereafter, public concerns were expressed in
regard to development of the 1997 preferred site. In response to those concerns, the
Department opted to conduct an alternatives analysis of potential campsites within the
park. This report documents that effort. The alternatives analysis is organized in two
parts: Section I lists criteria used to identify and evaluate potential campsites; Section II
provides a brief description of the impacts associated with campground development at
each of the six sites.
I. Re-Evaluation Criteria
Physical Features
Earth moving associated with campground development is a critical siting consideration.
The optimal selected site can be constructed with minimal grading. Campsites, building
sites, septic fields, parking lots and playgrounds need nearly level surfaces with sufficient
slope for surface water drainage. A slope of 1-3 % is best depending on surface material
such as turf, gravel, or asphalt. Gentle slopes (< 5%) on the campground road are also
important to accommodate movement of camping units.
The extent of earthwork needed to meet slope criteria on steep, undulating sites can be
very costly. Grading can also result in additional impacts including alteration of natural
drainage pattenls, potential for erosion, diminished ability to re-establish grasses, shrubs
and trees (i.e. exposure of low nutrient soils), disturbance to or loss of wildlife habitat,
and impacts to historical and archeological resources.
Area
Approximately 30 acres of developable land is needed to meet campground design
standards for 80 campsites and supporting infrastructure (roads, parking, septic system,
support buildings, playground).
Topography
Each individual campsite spur and pad should have a 1.5 % to 2% slope for camper or
tent leveling and surface water drainage. Roads and pathways should have a maximum
slope of 5%, with a 2-3% slope desired to meet American Disabilities Act (ADA)
standards. Building sites should have a maximum slope of 2%-5% for optimal surface
water drainage and to comply with handicapped accessibility (_~DA) standards. Sites with
slopes of 10% or more are typically considered unsuitable for development .due to high
cost of earthwork and associated erosion potential.
Soils
Soils need to have suitable engineering characteristics in order to allow road, building,
and septic system development in compliance with applicable construction standards.
Soil fertility must be capable of supporting tree and shrub growth. Soils should not be
highly erosive.
Water Supply
Potable water is needed for campsite users.' Groundwater must be readily available and of
sufficient quality to allow for potable well development in compliance with applicable
well construction standards.
Wastewater Treatment
The campground area must have suitable size and soil type to allow full compliance with
applicable septic system installation requirements.
Environmental Criteria
Vebetative cover
Campground design should minimize the need for tree removal in order to maintain
desired shading characteristics at campsites. Shnib removal should be minimized to
promote campsite privacy. Disturbance to other native plant communities should be
minimized to maintain biological diversity (exceptions will include establishrilent of turf
areas on campsite pads, adjacent to buildings and within the playground area.)
Wetlands
Direct wetland impacts must be avoided. Negative indirect impacts (i.e. stormwater
runoff) should be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
2
Water Resources
Waterway fills, shoreline disturbance or other direct impacts must be avoided. Hard
surface roads and buildings should not be constructed within the minimum waterwway and
wetland 75 foot setback limits ~to avoid indirect impacts.
Construction_site best management practices (BiVIPs) should be followed while
developing campground roads, buildings and ancillazy facilities. Stormwater drainage
will be directed away from wetlands and waterways and into identified upland infiltration
areas.
Wildlife Habitat - EndangeredlThreatened Species
Campground development (and camper activity) should avoid direct and minimize
negative indirect impacts to endangered and threatened species and their habitats. Efforts
should be made to avoid or minimize impacts to high duality wildlife habitat.
Cultural Resources
The campground area should be surveyed for presence of historic and archeological
resources prior to site development. Resources identified should be avoided or suitably
protected.
Operational Concerns
Aesthetics
Homes and businesses adjacent to the park should clot be highly visible from the
campground. Likewise the campground should no# be highly visible from homes,
businesses and roads adjacent to the park.
Security
For-security purposes the campground must be loca#ed off of the main park road past the
Park Entrance Visitors Station (PENS).
Noise
To the extent practicable, the campground should be located away from high noise
sources.
Safety
The campground should be located in an area not prone to flooding from the Willow
River. Vehicular transportation should be managed to prevent traffic safety hazards,
especially to pedestrians and bicyclists. The site should be readily accessible for park
security patrols.
User Experience
The campground should be located in a scenic setting to maximize the quality of the
outdoor experience and minimize conflicts with other campers and day users. The
facility should provide campers the opportunity to experience nature and solitude.
3
Operational Efficiency
The campground should be located beyond the PEVS to ensure visitor safety and
security, and to allow efficient camper fee collection. The campground should also be
situated to avoid disruption to existing vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic pattei-~1s,
including hiking trails. It should provide access to park use areas, trails and facilities
whenever possible. It should also enable efficient access for security, garbage collection
and other necessary maintenance activities.
Note: Design is presently underway for a new PEVS at Willow River. The new facility
will be located along the existing park entrance road, east of the present location, closer
to CTH A.
II~ Aiternativ~s Analysis
Using the above-described criteria as a guide, six sites were identif ed as having potential
for development within available budget constraints. Each of the six sites is located south
of the Willow River, west of CTH~A, and near the primary park road (Refer to the
attached park bot:ndary map).
Site 1 -Western wooded terrace near Willow River (1997 selected site)
Site 2 -Northeast wooded terrace near Willow River
Site 3 -Northeast grassland near park entrance road
Site 4 -Grassland south of park entrance road
Site 5 -Existing PEVS and sun~ounding area
Site 6 -Grassland west of existing PEVS
~I~e ~
Physical Features
Site 1 is an approximately 32 acre, flat (< 3% slope) wooded terrace with interspersed
wetland depressions totaling 2.7 acres. Upland sandy loam soils are suitable for well and
septic system installation. Campground development and wetland protection goals can be
met but would require special pleasures (bridging, site design modifications) to avoid
direct wetland impacts.
Environmental
Shnib/scrub, emergent wet meadow, sedge meadow and shallow marsh wetlands are
present on site and have been delineated. Some of these wetlands have been artificially
created from past agricultural drainage practices and are degraded due to presence of
invasive species including European buckthorn and reed canary grass. Direct wetland
impacts can be avoided by design modifications inchding the addition of one bridge.
Indirect impacts can be minimized by meeting waterway and wetland setbacks,
stormwater diversion to infiltration areas, and other BMPs, without major limitation to
campsite development goals.
4
The forested portion of this area contains remnant oak savanna. The open portion
contains small amounts of degraded sand prairie. A recent site stuvey found 39 prairie
plant species, with forbs being common in numbers and distribution. Leafy spurgeand
spotted knapweed, both. considered undesirable invasive species, are well distributed
throughout the prairie. Much of the forested area is degraded by heavy deer browsing and
buckthorn. Despite past agricultural disturbance this area contains a mix of habitats that
in context and combination provide ecological attributes ofimportance for conservation.
wildlife includes common woodland birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians. There are
no records for threatened or endangered plants or animals at this site.
Campground development would preclude large scale efforts for prairie and savanna
restoration and may limit the effectiveness of future invasive species control initiatives.
The Department completed anareheological sin•vey of Site 1 in November, 1996. No
historic strictures or significant archeological resources are known to be present.
dperational Concerns.
Site 1 is large enough to accommodate 80 campsites without major disturbance to
physical features. It is mostly flat, secluded and scenic.. It would not be visible to travelers
or neighboring homes or businesses. No significant noise sources are located near the
site.
This site is located near the park main use area. All campsite users, including motor
homes, would access the site by traveling the full Iength of the main park road.
Development and use of this site would require park staff cover a larger geographic area
while providing park security and maintenance services.
When originally evaluated, this site was not thought to be located within the Willow
River floodplain. Recent analysis indicated it was possible, though unlikely, that the
upstream Little Falls dam could fail due to extreme flooding, gate failure, ice jams or
other circumstances. Such a catastrophic failure could increase the downstream flood
elevation. A dam failure analysis indicated a portion of Site 1 would be inundated during
such an event. One remedy would be to elevate portions of the site as much as 4-6 feet to
be above dam failure flood levels. Adding this amount of fill would, however,
substantially increase site development costs and result in substantial environmental
impacts.
Site 2
Physical Features
This site is an approximately 30-acre wooded terrace with wetland depressions. Upland
soils are suitable for well and septic system installation. Adequate drainfield size
requirements and compliance with well and septic system installation code setbacks may
present problems due to limited areas considered suitable for development. Access to the
site would require a 0.5 mile road extension through extremely steep, wooded terrain,
with associated risk of stormwater management problems.
En~ironinental
Wetlands have not been comprehensively surveyed or delineated on Site 2. Though not
disturbed by past farming practices, the wetlands are of similar type and quality as those
found on Site 1. Wetland impact avoidance, compliance with waterway and wetland
setbacks, stormwater routing to upland infiltration areas, and compliance with other
BMPs would substantially limit the amount of area available for campground
development.
Upland areas at the campground site contain oak woodlands and remnant savanna and
sand prairie habitats. Thirty prairie plant species have been documented. Grasses
dominate and forbs are somewhat limited in numbers and distribution. Spotted lcnapweed
is present but limited in distribution. Much of the forested area is degraded by heavy deer
browsing and European buckthonl. A state endangered plant species is known to exist at
the site. Although somewhat degraded, this area contains an assemblage of wetlands and
plant communities that in context and combination provide ecological attributes
important toconservation.
A comprehensive survey of wildlife use has not been conducted. Aside from presence of
a hiking trail, this site is largely isolated by topography from the most intensive park use
areas. Diverse habitats likely host woodland birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles
found ii1 similar habitats throughout the park. This site is not known to harbor endangered
or threatened wildlife species.
No historic structures are known to be present. If selected this site would be surveyed for
presence of archeological resources prior to development.
Operational Concerns
Site 2 is scenic, secluded, separated from significant noise sources, and would provide a
high quality camping experience. Access road construction would cause substantial
impacts to physical features and woodland habitat. Wetland impact avoidance would
allow for development of approximately 40 campsites. Campground development in this
remote area would complicate park staff ability to provide security and maintenance
services. Portions of the site are within the Willow River floodplain.
Site 3
Physical Features
This site consists of approximately 40 acres of gently rolling grasslands. Topography is
generally < 5% slope and would not be a major limiting factor in campground or road
access development. Soils are awell-drained sandy loam that would not limit septic
system or well installation. The soils may tend to be droughty during diy periods. Thus,
shade tree and shrub establishment may be a challenge.
Environmental
No wetlands/waterways are present and no problems are anticipated for stormwater
management.
This site is essentially a highly disturbed old agricultural field with scattered prairie
species. Leafy spurge and. spotted knapweed are both distributed throughout the area, but
are not abundant.
Grassland bird habitat is present, but the lack of high quality natural communities and
low plant diversity limits the site's ecological value. Close proximity to forested areas
and CTH A also limit habitat quality. These factors aside, when juxtaposed to the larger
open grassland to the south,this site provides wide horizons for prairie birds, as well as
small mammal habitat and foraging sites for raptors. No threatened or endangered plant
or animal species have been recorded on the site. Pheasants Forever and WDNR are
planning prairie restoration on this site to improve plant species diversity.
Site 3 is not known to contain any historic stnlctures. If selected this site would be
surveyed for presence of archeological resources prior to development.
Operational Concerns
Site 3 is large enough to meet camper demand. The quality of camper experience may be
limited due to the. lack of vegetative screening and close proximity to CTH A. Trail
connections in the area are readily available for users. The establishment of dense
vegetative plantings at this site can screen the campground from travelers on CTH A and
contribute to the scenic quality of the park entrance area. Similar to Site 1, development
at this site would enlarge the geographic area for security, maintenance and other park
services. Due to the close proximity to CTH A, the campground would be designed to
reduce the risk of unauthorized campsite access and potential associated issues such as
theft or vandalism.
Site 4
Physical Features
This grassland site covers approximately 30 acres. Topography is consistently greater
than IO% slope. Sandy loam soils would not limit well or septic system installation.
Steep topography would present stormwater management and erosion control challenges.
Environmental
No wetlands/waterways are present.
While this area. is dominated by exotic cool season grasses with scattered prairie species,
it is essentially an old agricultural field. Leafy spurge and spotted knapweed are
7
present but not abundant.
Despite past land use disturbance and the presence of invasive species, the site provides
Rood habitat for grassland birds. A state threatened bird species is known to nest at Site 4.
There are no records for threatened or endangered plants. Pheasants Forever and the
Department are planning prairie restoration at this site.
No historic strictures are known to be present. If selected this site would be surveyed for
archeological resources.
Operational Concerns
Although this site has enough area to fully meet campsite demand, steep topography
would require substantial earthwork and create high potential for erosion. This site is
located within 250 feet of the park's shop and equipment storage area. The camping
experience would be impacted as the shop would be visible fi-o1n the campground and
noise from maintenance activity would be audible.
Site 5
Physical Features
This 9-acre site is the located at the existing PEVS and includes adjacent grassland and
prairie to the northeast. The PEVS site is mostly level and includes a small building,
paved parking area and the main park entrance road. Funds have been secured to relocate
the PEVS. Current plans call for conversion of the site to a trail head parking area. The
existing PEVS has water supply and septic system facilities that could be converted for
campground use.
Environmental
No wetlands or waterways are present and no problems are anticipated in regard to
stormwater management.
This site contains a fairly diverse prairie remnant. Approximately 20-30 prairie plant
species are present with forbs being common in numbers and distribution. Spotted
knapweed is present in the prairie but limited in distribution. One endangered plant
species is known to occur in the area.
Wildlife use is similar to that expected at Site 3. No endangered or threatened wildlife
species are known to utilize Site 5.
No historic structures are known to be present. If selected this site would be surveyed for
archeological resources.
Operational Concerns
This site does not have sufficient size to fully meet campsite demand. Other operational
concerns are minimal due to this site's location on the main park road.
Site 6
Physical Features
This site is an agricultural old field coveringapproximately 11 acres. Most of the site has
relatively steep topography, with slopes of 5-10% and greater. Sandy loam soils would
not limit well or septic system placement.
Environmental
No wetlands/waterways are present and no problems are anticipated for stormwater
management.
This site contains exotic grasses and "old field" weeds interspersed with native prairie
species. The lack of natural communities and habitat diversity limit this site's ecological
attributes. Spotted knapweed is prese~~lt.
Wildlife use is .expected to be similar to Site 3. No threatened or endangered plant or
animal species are known to be present.
No historic resources known to be present. If selected this site would be surveyed for
archeological resources.
Operational Concerns
This site is not large enough to fully meet campsite demand. Due to proximity to the
main park road, operational concerns are expected to be minimal.
Combination Alternative
The combination site involves a smaller version of Sites 3 and 5. While other
options are possible, these two sites were chosen because other sites individually
presented major constraints such as dam break floodplain (Sitel), size (Sites S and 6) or
steep topography (Site 2 access and Site 4). A combination alternative also minimized
potential negative effects from full scale development at any one site.
Site 5 would be an attractive over-night parking area for Iarge motor homes or other
camper units traveling to non-park destinations on the nearby Interstate highway. These
travelers are typically looking for ashort-term parking rather than an outdoor camping
experience. Promoting Site 5 .for such use may help reduce footprint size and operational
concerns (aesthetic, noise, security, etc.) associated with full-scale development at Site 3.
The combination alternative promotes productive and compatible re-use of Site 5.
Physical Features
Development of Site 3 could be designed to include 28-30 acres for 60-70 campsites
located on level sites to minimize grading. Development of Site 5 for 10-20 campsites
9
could be partly confined to within the existing PEVS footprint. Existing Site 5 water and
septic systems would be retained to minimize development costs. Connecting road access
at both sites is not a constraint. Campground development at Site 5 would require
relocation of the planned new trail head and day user parking.
Environmental
OveraIl habitat impacts at both sites would be reduced, though some development outside
the Site 5 PEVS demolition footprint would be unavoidable. Under this alternative, plans
for protection of the endangered plant species known to be present near Site 5 would
need to be developed and implemented.
Operational Concerns
A smaller Site 3 campground would allow an increase in the buffer zone betw=een the
campsites and CTH A, thus reducing aesthetic, noise and security impacts.
Large RV traffic may be reduced in the interior of the park if those vehicles are parked at
anew campground closer to the park entrance. Use of smaller towed vehicles or bicycles
by RV owners would fiu-ther reduce traffic.
The combination alternative would reduce the physical and environmental impacts at
both Sites 3 and 5, but disturbance would collectively be greater if both sites were
developed with a full range of campground amenities. In addition, the combination
alternative may present other challenges. For instance, design and constriction costs for
two new sites are cui~ently unknown and may increase.
Summary of Findings
The "no development" alternative is not considered viable as there is a significant unmet
demand for additional camping at Willow River State Park.
Site 1, the 1997 preferred site, is no longer considered feasible due to its location within
the Little Falls Dam break regulatory flood elevation and the impacts associated with
addressing that issue.
Sites 2 and 4 are not feasible due to steep topography and environmental concerns.
Sites 5 and 6 are too small to individually satisfy the project need.
The Combination Alternative (Sites 3 and 5) best meets all screening criteria and is thus
the Department's new preferred alternative.
This ~°eport was coi~zpiled by: Mitre Ries, Toni Lovejoy, Darrell Richer, Armu~~d Bartz,
Harvey Halvorsen, Ted Joh~ason, Jirn Devlin, Ga~~y Lepak, .Ieaiz Rygiel, and Craig
Tho»i~soi~.
10
~~~ ~~~-d ,~« .=.ti t ._...,.~...
~ ~ e.= F.~ ~
'
~
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, 4 ~ ~w
~
-
`
~
'
'_
.
~ a ~ ~
F r,
y ^~ a
~ 5w A
x
~ ~. *.
C°
... a. ~..
t;
'~" ,P~xa ~.
~ ~
~ ~~
`~ pf ~
~ ~.~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 'q ~
C y
~
~€ Q
~ ~ *
'
--
4 at .
i ~ n ~.
-' ~ ~'~~
~ .s. .. ;
~~
~ ~ ~~ ~1
.. .
~ ~ _
_.. .... - `
. ~.
~
~ F
~ ~
~ u[s
~
~ ~ m.
~ ;~ ":-r .i"'", ~~ "'~ _ ~ arc _.> ,~~ ~.' ~ .>
~
~» .. ~ ...
1 t . y
y
.
'
I
~ •'~E ~ tSi::"
!!!
! r
: ~, ~
~ F1.~'Fj
~ ,;~ 1
~~
_ e_
.;. ~ ~
t r,~, 4:;
~
`~~ ~ ~ i
t~ ~,
_ ~ ~.
~ ~ l ~,
~ ~ ~ '',~ -
~ ~
~
' t ..,
~ ~
~
-~
~ ~ ~
i ~
-~
~ ~ ~: _
i
"
~
'
~
°~
ti
. ., ~
_._
~.
.„~_
1,
,~, „~,
,~ ,,,,
'~_
,,~~
-~-x ~
`'_
Z.. µ3
r
'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~#
~' ~'~s~"~;;-~a~w,»~ ~"r 'talc, `
~ ,- ,
£ ~ x ~ ",` )
^~ f ~
~ ?~
'".
,
it ~ ~ ,
,~ '.
C ~ ~ ~':' '' .«
'k ~ R , > 7 r ~i ~ « k f ~ ~ a, ! r ~,,
t"`~ L. 4 .~ _ ~ ~ i a ~ ~ '^' ~ ~t ~ 1.
,- ~ ~ ~.
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~'~
~ }~ ~ `~ " °" ~ t. i~ .
a i
" ~ y ~ ~ ~ - ." 4 ~ ..
w b ~ y c d ~' ~ y o m .. r .,ti' '.~ ;'t~ ,~ ` '~ t ~ `~, ~ ~.. 3 ~. ~ ~`F 4 {
y m o v 3 a ~
3~ ~ o b E ~- ~, w s r~
y ~, c o n °r m y y ~t~,~'!~ .~s ~ 1rk ,'1 d `A} ~ ~.~ 1i .I {~ .
~... °`c
.o ~ A '~ v C ~ -°~ H ^' v ~ 'Q~e t A ~ ~ ' ' -~ t ~. ~ . - ~ '. 'Ifa., ~ psi ~ ~.
n ~ { y,
_^. ~ ~ ?. y ~ o. „ w ,.,, ~ ,~... 'jY /AC r Z, _ ~~, i... F ~~ ~ Lr. ~ ~` ~ _ • ~l'~ ..~ ! ~» ~ '~
m m o T y ° v °°. w o n (-` ~ ~ fi a ~. ~
'D =' ~ ~ o ~ ~ c. ~ c. r t .. J I_, :_~ i 1_1 ~~k zD>X' 3' ..r.7,w, ~
~,.~ ~ ~
a ~,..~ _
N O ~~z '
O p ~ _ b ,~~
1
O - K
' O '., "~
~ ~
lp CD
T V
W
O
~ '
~ k
/~
~ ~
• u
W
~
•7u] ' a
V
K ».
~. c
i.:
~,+. s
~:" ~}
j x
~
~
~ P rR K
Ej ~Y a '.~~
E g C s5$ ~ y~
S~~.s~~~e~8
~a ~ ~~
~ ~ -r Y~~.w„
.
~~c•s~ ~$ ~~~ ' ,s
~~ c~ s~~~ ue
~ v8~66'j~ ;a ., ~ia~~,Y~
~ a t
c~ ~
O ~,
f
~~.
O a z `~ ~_
O at
N m
.i;
;
O
w
.
W ~~~ ~
p0 ~r0-
~ ~N
N ~ a
~
~ ~ ~
t?`
a~'.~
~,'' ,.
~~
ii
.~
t~
~~
~~ h
_"~
~ ~ ,~ ,
a .;~ .d@r~ i~F
`~ ' ` ° ~'~
F~~x .~Fx ~i~ t ~ .
~~1, a ~~ .~ ~ ~1
~ ,~'~ ;:
`~ _~~ w
~ ~Y 41
l
„ ~ y*f~
s~ ~ O ~ ~"
[ ~~~
/ ~']U
.'} j: ~ 1.1 ~...
* ~ ^ ~ ~
< a
y
~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ w~
~~
~~ ~ ~~.~
.. ~. .. . V
~~~
.~..
;P ~A
'.~~
`J
u~ r•
V ~~
O
F~ ~ ~~
y~ \ 1 ~^
W ~ gyp
'~ l^
u~ v`
,~ i
V 1 O </{~.
\V
~ '~--
A6~~
e ~~ ~ ~ 2
~~~R ~~ R ~.~~ ~
c a.@~a
~~
~~ 6 2 r.6~ Ql~ ~
~~~s~~~
Y
uz ~G .
xia~ ~ ~C?
„~~.
z, ~ ~ ~ ,
7~. A3 fp #1 V rs ~•
r ~ t v ~~
«` s« i-
t °~' J H
~~~. ~~
r~ ~~
°s~ ~.
s ~.. a `~
...,.c .:~`.
f..
.4~~
~~~ .
~ ~
~"
1 ` `.
~-' ~
~ ~ ,~ =~.
~ _~~ ~.
~>
7 ~ ` ~; ~ e
r ~ F~ Ctii
r- R
l:A ~~.`F
~~
* ~ ~
a' 1FY ~.
r 3 ~.
cam:' T
a~}1
.~ C~
z , ~,,
_ ~a
.,tea
~J
4 '~t6•
~ 3 ter. ..~
4 ~ * u s r 1... 'kx ,, ~ ,
Y`~~I .fuV ~ Him ht .r `
1. ~
f~~ y ~ i ~ ~+ ti~'ysm'C{~,.3 ~ t y s t.
~~ ~~ y y ~ I ~ ~ "~ fsp
M~ ~ ,?Q3
a I _ ~
Q ~,~ 'Y ..<, K
ice; 4 ~ ~'
W ~~~ '" t ~~f u ~ 'r •~.~y, t~ ~ ~ 'y
C gr0- ~ ~`~ ~. `;~
O ..a ~~.
ate. ... "~A ..~:r~ ~~' .~~. ... `' :'oP~
~.~~_. S
~~,~~
~ ~y
~~ 1
l..F.`'l' ~~~ 3:.
t
wl
.h ixy
*"tY
Jennifer Shillcox
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject
RE: Willow River
State Park Up...
Fyi/df
David Fodroczi
Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:29 PM
Jennifer Shillcox; Robert Bezek
FW: RE: Willow River State Park Update
Dave Fodroczi
Planning & Zoning Director
davidf@co.saint-croix.wi.us
715-386-4672
-----Original Message-----
From: markell lanpher [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, December 13,
To: David Fodroczi
Subject: Fwd: RE: Willow River
Hi David,
markellmoore@yahoo.com]
2006 10:37 AM
State Park Update
Here is the latest from WI DNR. They have decided not to expand. the
campground along the Willow River as they initially planned. They have
decided that a better place for the campground is by the park entrance.
Public comment is now opened and there will be a meeting in January.
Please refer to the attached documents and forward this info to all
interested parties. A big thanks goes to Sheriff Hillstead for his
letter to WI-DNR that stated security concerns. While not mentioned in
the documents below, it is my opinion that his letter had a great
impact in the decision to change the expansion site.
Thank you.
Markell Lanpher
Note: forwarded message attached.
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
1
RE: Willow River State Park Update Page 1 of 3
Jennifer Shillcox
From: Thompson, Craig D -DNR [Craig.Thompson@Wisconsin.gov]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:38 AM
To: Rep.rhoades@legis.state.wi.us; Sen.harsdorf@legis.state.wi.us; ts433@baldwin-telecom.net;
renatacoty@hotmail.com; Mary Pat Finnegan; markell lanpher; mjdettling1@mmm.com; DENISE
ASCHENBRENER; JEFFREY SZUMILAS; Stacey Bellomo; mcmesserli@gwest.net;
dmeyer@mm.com; dlbode3@mmm.com; Fashingbauer, Margaret; Djwilliams959@aol.com; Lynn
Koll; Gayle Brooks; amoser@baldwin-telecom.net; robert.fashingbauer@dnr.state.mn.us;
nick.cekosh@legis.wisconsin.gov; suschapin@yahoo.com; andrewlamberson@hotmail.com;
jerodanderson@baldwin-telecom. net
Cc: Humrickhouse, Scott A -DNR; Osterndorf, Laurie J -DNR; Ries, Michael L -DNR; Rygiel, Jean A -
DNR; Richer, Darrel -DNR; Currie, Kimberly -DNR; Lovejoy, Tom A -DNR; Thompson, Craig D -
DNR
Subject: RE: Willow River State Park Update
Greetings:
We have completed the campground alternatives analysis for Willow River State Park. I've attached a copy of the
document for your consideration. I have also attached a map of Willow River State Park identifying sites
considered for campground development. Note we actually evaluated six sites, two more than originally identified.
The alternatives analysis led us to conclude Site 1 (the originally proposed site adjacent to the Trout Brook Trail)
is not feasible for campground development. Thus, Site 1 is no longer under consideration.
Our new preferred alternative is actually a combination of Sites 3 and 5, referred to as the "Combination
Alternative". The rational for that preliminary decision is provided in the analysis. We believe the preferred
alternative addresses environmental concerns raised by many of you over the last several months. it also enables
the Department to meet public demand for additional family camping facilities at Willow River.
We invite your comments on our preferred alternative. To that end, we have opened a public comment period that
will run until January 24, 2007. A copy of the news release announcing the public comment period and indicating
how to provide comments is attached. We will also host a public meeting to discuss the preferred alternative on
January 10, 2007 at the Hudson Town Hall from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Department staff will be available to
provide information and respond to questions. If you are unable to download these documents, please contact
me. Hard copy will be provided upon request.
I want to thank you for expressing your opinions about this matter and extend my appreciation for your patience.
Your passion for Willow River State Park is evident. Your continued involvement at the park is encouraged.
Sincerely,
-Craig Thompson
«Willow River Alternatives Evaluation.doc»
News Release Type 3.doc»
«WRSP Sites.JPG» «Willow River Campground EA
Craig D. Thompson
Regional Land Program Supervisor
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
3550 Mormon Coulee Road
1/17/2007
RE: Willow River State Park Update Page 2 of 3
La Crosse, WI 54601
(608) 785-1277
Craig.Thompson@dnr.state.wi.us
From: Thompson, Craig D -DNR
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:36 PM
To: 'Rep.rhoades@legis.state.wi.us'; 'Sen.harsdorf@legis.state.wi.us'; 'ts433@baldwin-telecom net'; 'renatacoty@hotmail.com'; 'Mary Pat
Finnegan'; 'markell lanpher'; 'mjdettlingl@mmm.com'; 'DENISE ASCHENBRENER'; 'JEFFREY SZUMILAS'; 'Stacey Bellomo';
'mcmesserli@gwest,net'; 'dmeyer@mm.com'; 'dlbode3@mmm.com'; 'Fashingbauer, Margaret'; 'Djwilliams959@aol.com'; 'Lynn Koll'; 'Gayle
Brooks'; 'amoser@baldwin-telecom.net'; 'robert.fashingbauer@dnr.state.mn.us'; 'nick.cekosh@legis.wisconsin.gov'; suschapin@yahoo.com
Cc: Humrickhouse, Scott A -DNR; Ries, Michael L -DNR; Rygiel, Jean A -DNR; Richer, Darrel -DNR; Thompson, Craig D -DNR
Subject: RE: Willow River State Park Update
Greetings
In my October a-mail I indicated we were striving to complete the family campground alternatives analysis
during November. While not quite complete, we anticipate finishing the analysis next week.
I do want to emphasize we have not yet made a decision about where to provide additional family camping
capacity within the park. We remain committed to providing the opportunity for public input on the matter.
How and when that will happen will be decided after the analysis is complete.
Your continued patience is appreciated. I'll provide another status report on our efforts by the end of next
week.
Sincerely,
-Craig Thompson
Craig D. Thompson
Regional Land Program Supervisor
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
3550 Mormon Coulee Road
La Crosse, WI 54601
(608) 785-1277
Craig.Thompson@dnr.state.wi.us
From: Thompson, Craig D -DNR
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 10:32 AM
To: Rep.rhoades@legis.state.wi.us; Sen.harsdorf@legis.state.wi.us; 'ts433@baldwin-telecom.net'; 'renatacoty@hotmail.com';
'Mary Pat Finnegan'; 'markell lanpher'; 'mjdettlingl@mmm.com'; 'DENISE ASCHENBRENER'; 'JEFFREY SZUMILAS'; 'Stacey Bellomo';
'mcmesserli@gwest.net'; 'dmeyer@mm.com'; 'dlbode3@mmm.com'; 'Fashingbauer, Margaret'; 'Djwilliams959@aol.com'; 'Lynn Koll';
'Gayle Brooks'; 'amoser@baldwin-telecom.net'; 'robert.fashingbauer@dnr,state.mn.us'; 'nick.cekosh@legis.wisconsin.gov'
Cc: Humrickhouse, Scott A -DNR; Osterndorf, Laurie J -DNR; Biermeier, Peter C -DNR; Ries, Michael L -DNR; Richer, Darrel -
DNR; Hagman, John C -DNR
1/17/2007
R>` : Willow River State Park Update Page 3 of 3
Subject: Willow River State Park Update
Greetings:
I'm writing to provide you an update on the Willow River State Park campground expansion project.
In late September, we suspended design work on the proposed campground expansion site due to
concerns raised about potential impacts to natural resources. Subsequent to that decision, we
initiated an new alternatives analysis to determine the best location for expanding family camping
within the park. I have attached a map showing the location of four sites included in the alternative
analysis. Please note the site originally proposed (Site No. 4 on the map) continues to be evaluated
in relation to three additional sites.
We are striving to be as thorough and objective as possible in our analysis. Evaluation criteria for
each site include:
^ Natural resource impacts (wildlife habitat, plant communities, endangered resources,
wetlands, surface water, groundwater)
^ Physical features (topography, soils, drainage)
^ Historical and archeological significance
^ Operational issues (security, maintenance, proximity to recreational facilities, revenue
generation)
^ Campsite characteristics (setting, noise, space, vegetative screening)
^ Design issues (access, layout, costs)
DNR specialists are conducting the evaluations. Scientists and engineers with Ayres and
Associates, the engineering consultants retained to design new facilities at the park, are also
providing information for use in the analysis. When complete (we're still shooting for sometime in
November) we will provide the results for your consideration. We will also host a meeting to provide
a public forum for discussion of the analysis. We will not make a decision about the location of a
new family campground until after all public comments have been fully considered.
I will notify you when the alternatives analysis is complete. Until then, your cooperation in this matter
is appreciated. If you are unable to download and print the map, provide your mailing address and
I'll send you a hard copy. Feel free to share this information with others. Should you have
questions, please contact me directly.
Sincerely,
-Craig Thompson
File: Sites Evaluated for Family Campground_10-11-06.JPG »
Craig D. Thompson
Regional Land Program Supervisor
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
3550 Mormon Coulee Road
La Crosse, WI 54601
(608) 785-1277
Craig.Thompson@dnr.state.wi. us
1 /17/2007
.
t
` ~ 1e~.~eeY~'.~
~"fo~ enak aa.
- etSi i.R.
~#
~ ~f~i~stic~Roadr~t3, -
N
° ~.
"
• ~ C ~ N
~ N
~
N N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
'..
r .
~
1
3 6 N
O n N ". O~ J J
0
3
J N J
~
~_
m~ ~y _
i
• '. ~•
~~
, 3
~K
9
N X 6 N C N Oy
~
'~ •~ m
a
c
.11 ~ ~
o ~
r
~~ 3 1
1
N
~
.
1 ~
•
~ •~
.R 3
~
~t
to
~(
..
~[ .
~.. 1 1m tV r.~
• ~~• [
~ ~~ ~ ~
1 m ~~ ~ ~ a 3 N -`
' 1 '~-r~ ~ ~.rx0~~ i i3 ~ C ~
75
1 ~ ,-~~ a w
e •
1
~
~
~ 77
a o
+: ~.
a
1
~
~ ,
m
o
~
~' ~ ~..~~~ 1 ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ N vii} N. , ,. •,~;, -.
~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 'AQl O 37 C , a~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ `O
, N i2 SU, 1 .
y'11 , f
'~ ~ ~ j ~+ :a
~: y~~
tt
~j te,
~
~
1: ac
.•
•.
.~
. {
4
~
~ ~a i ~ ,• .:
~,~ .~
.., .~
~
. ~ ~ :p _
us= j
o ""
~`` m o . ~
~'~
: ~
~ ~
~ 1 ~ co ~ ~ r~
~ F~~ Y
~
j ~;}~~
~
{~ ~
~
~
~~i'~ ~
1
~Q'.~1
Ij3
=~
~ eE I i ~ 1-: -~:
f ~ ~
.. ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ats+
, k ~
~ ;
;~~~~
~~:
..
~.
n ~ m Q:
'~ 1 ~,,, . ,. m
~ a ;
~ o
v~
i `fl. ~:
a •..a m.+
~o r
3
1 o
. ~`c _
~ D.
I
1
1.
1.'..... ^.
~. ,...~
~:$ •`;
O ~
•_~i ~~•
i
.Q~ :.'e!~..:
~
C
Fw state land zoning jurisdiction I.txt
From: Robert Bezel<
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:08 AM
To: 7ennifer Shillcox
Subject: Fw: state land zoning jurisdiction
fyi
Bob Bezek, Code Administrator
St. Croix County Planning & Zoning
--Original Message-----
From: wCCA@googlegroups.com [mailto:wCCA@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew
Mrochinski
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:00 AM
To: wCCA@googlegroups.com
subject: RE: state land zoning jurisdiction
Pursuant to Attorney General opinion #OAG-9-93, the DNR is not subject
to local zoning ordinances with respect to its construction of any
building, structure, or facility whose purpose is to assure the general
public access to outdoor recreational areas...don't know if the fact
that the lake commission is involved makes a difference or not.
Matthew Mrochi nslci
Code Administrator
Sheboygan County Planning and Resources Dept.
Mail to: mrochmm@co.sheboygan.wi.us
Phone: 920.459.3060
Fax: 920.459.1332
--original Message-----
From: wCCA@googlegroups.com [mailto:wCCA@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Godfrey
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 5:08 PM
TO: WCCA
Subject: state land zoning jurisdiction
okay, call me lazy. Anyone out there have definitive answer whether
state-owned land is subject to county zoning? we have a proposed rifle
range on land owned by the state, managed ,jointly by the DNR and lake
commission. Neighbors are a bit anxious.
Thanks.
Scott
NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
delete all copies.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WCCA"
group.
To post to this group, send email to wCCA@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to WCCA-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/WCCA
Page 1
Fw state land zoning jurisdiction.txt
From; Robert Bezek
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:16 AM
To: Jennifer Shillcox
Subject: Fw: state land zoning jurisdiction
This says it better
Bob Bezek, Code Administrator
St. Croix County Planning & Zoning
--Original Message-----
From: WCCA@googlegroups.com [mailto:wCCA@googlegroups.com] on Behalf of Michelle
staff
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:13 AM
To: WCCA@googlegroups.com
subject: RE: state land zoning jurisdiction
13.48(13)(a) state Statutes
(a) Except as provided in par. (b) or (c), every building, structure or
facility that is constructed for the benefit of or use of the state, any
state agency, board, commission or department, the university of
Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority, the Fox River Navigational
System Authority, or any local professional baseball park district
created under subch. III of ch. 229 if the construction is undertaken by
the department of administration on behalf of the district, shall be in
compliance with all applicable state laws, rules, codes and regulations
but the construction is not subject to the ordinances or regulations of
the municipality in which the construction takes place except zoning,
including without limitation because of enumeration ordinances or
regulations relating to materials used, permits, supervision of
construction or installation, payment of permit fees, or other
restrictions.
--Original Message-----
From: WCCA@googlegroups.com [mailto:wCCA@googlegroups.com] on Behalf of
Scott Godfrey
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 5:08 PM
TO: WCCA
Subject: state land zoning jurisdiction
okay, call me lazy. Anyone out there have definitive answer whether
state-owned land is subject to county zoning? we have a proposed rifle
range on land owned by the state, managed jointly by the DNR and lake
commission. Neighbors are a bit anxious.
Thanks.
Scott
NOTICE: This E-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. use
and further disclosure of the information by the recipient must be consistent with
applicable laws, regulations and agreements. If you received this E-mail in error,
please notify the sender; delete the E-mail; and do not use, disclose or store the
information it contains.
you received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WCCA"
Page 1
Fw state land zoning jurisdiction.txt
group.
To post to this group, send email to wCCa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wCCA-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wCCA
Page 2
Page 1 of 2
Robert Bezek
From: Greg Timmerman
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Rod Eslinger
Subject: RE: UWRF and 13.48 (13) Wi. Stats.
Wisconsin Statutes sec. 13.48(13) makes local zoning ordinances applicable to State agencies. Unless UW-RF can identify another
statute that exempts them from local zoning, the farm operation would be subject to a special exception use (conditional use)
permit application process for a governmental use in the Agricultural Residential District. (I'm assuming the land is zoned Ag.-
Res.; governmental uses are also allowed as a special exception in the Agricultural District.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Rod Eslinger
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Greg Timmerman
Cc: Steven Fisher; David Sander
Subject: UWRF and 13.48 (13) Wi. Stats.
Hi Greg,
I believe I have asked you before whether or not the University of Wisconsin-River Falls is exempt from
the County permit process based on the Wis. Stat. 13.48 (13). I specifically questioned whether the
County had authority to issue LUP to the University of Wisconsin-River Falls for a manure storage
facility to serve a new free stall barn and milking parlor at Lab 2 (which is located in the ETZ of River
Falls).
Section 17.01 (2) reads: Unless specifically exempted by law, all cities, villages, towns, and counties
are required to comply with this chapter and obtain all necessary permits. State_ag_encies are
required to corn~ly when_Stat.13,4~~ applies. The construction, reconstruction, maintenance and
repair of State highways and bridges by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation are exempt
when Stat 30.12 (4) (a) applies.
;i~~; ?t ht'T H"', tip. , +,1 i~,'.'. S. et t(R. ..',ii_t.,, ~)qt st `~. Sit t>i i4"i±
Ott t,~l r,i~z~~~;, i.r~ (a~r~?~ a<. ~,~.r, ~,Irci i~< <~.ac r}ti~~ o,' ~r i. ~:;,~iz
hx~il.lii~~,~, a~~l~: tu~x~ ni liix°itih' gtat i, ecui~ui~.a~d fr,r the lx: n.~t~it v1
.u ~aw° of ti~_ .~k~lc, rni} tib:-~_•. x~=:_ tx~aESi, ti4vir~nv a =ii a s:~p~rt-
F)n:ut, ili~~ ( nrei tsit: ~.!` l; ~set~e>ii~ 1~,~s~~~i t.t1 ~°tnYtil ~. hni=. :~ rznihot'-
11}: ~h: {~<.: [Zia:,:r ?-a.ir~tis;i~a) ~~=.tcsn :~.Aitlaant~ _~~ :err l~.;d
pr„t>-, i:»7;J [,,r=~°I>;~.i) ~srl,zii<i~i~t ~_resh:~d mnticr s~ii,,~h. Ill a( ch.
"'~ it ib~ «~~arucut~n i~ ana~rit:ilen hi~ thr ric}xat'tin=_nf cal ~uiniiii-.
isti:ui.>ii oar belurlf of th^ di>ui~t.::h:,ll ho in e.~~~~xli:~nc,° niih:All
;1t~phc~lzlc ~1.73c l.fa.:~. rizles. ~i~dc-> rnx7 rr~ula7ionx. tnu ¢iie
.,~n~h-ititic+ti i~ ~x.rt >,uhjcut to the dnilinsinsc. nr rc~llla~~.an~. ~,i tiuc
imimiel~~nlYt~,°in +~:h~rh tl~ con;~leuctu~~r tate~ ~l~~r~:^xc~Eat umirr=-
iu,_ludi~,_~~itlx„n1iG~rrii;ititmhctsu~,.r~t=:nurncr'~t4~~ ~lr~~~_
<:r ir~~.nl:vi~n- i~ fvi»~: t:, mcxt~ri;il, trrd. t'cti7~it ,F ~. ~ ~ .. rrf
:wr'ini~)irn ~.;r insetll~ti~a1_ prg~nei~Lc~i lw~mri I. r ~~iF~r
i~c5ffic° Lions.
Since I have misplaced/lost my notes from our earlier discussion regarding this matter, please re-state
your opinion whether or not UW-RF is exempt from the County permitting process based on 13.48 (13)
Wi. Stats.
Thanks
Rod
1 / 18/2006