The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About026-1105-60-000 ORDINANCE DECISION TREND ANALYSIS Data Collection/Analysis Would Include: Initial Data Computer/Property I.D. # 0 "2 — l rl �— 6 0 Owner's Name , Property Address Zoning District A2 AG AR RES COM 1ND Past Zoning A2 AG AR RES COM IND Overlay District NONE SHORELAND WETLAND FLOODPLAIN RIVERWAY Location -- Section, Town, Range, Lot Acres 5 SL Request Date y� ` Disposition DENIED PROVED WITHDRAWN POSTPONED Date Activi Rezoning / ariance / pecial Exception Q 1 Type of Variance/Special Exception 4/ AleQ ROAD/HWY. SETBACK WATER SETBACK BLUFFLINE SETBACK LOT RATIO DRIVEWAY SEPARATION NONCONFORMING LOT SIZE Ordinance Citation_ Supporting Evidence Description PLOT MAP/PLAN SITE PLAN TOWN APPROVAL LTR CSM PHOTOS MAPS SOIL TEST Hardship � NO Linked to Rezoning YES NO Conditions EXPIRATION DATE COMPLETION ACCORDING TO PLAN ALL PERK UTS COMPLETE ZONING OFFICE ACCESS & NOTIFICATION UPON COMPLETION EROSION CONTROL Objections YES NO Parcel #: 026-1105-60-000 06/27/2014 F 1 PAGE E 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel#: 19.30.18.585B 026-TOWN OF RICHMOND Current OX ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner O-MEISTER, DAVID J DAVID J MEISTER 1402 CTY RD A NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 Property Address(es): *=Primary * 1402 CTY RD A Districts: SC =School SP=Special Type Dist# Description SC 3962 SCH DIST NEW RICHMOND SP 7040 RICHMOND SANITARY DIST 1 Notes: SP 8020 UPPER WILLOW REHAB DIST SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 0.125 SEC 19 T30N R18W.125A VIL OF BOARDMAN S 1/2 LOT 2 BLK2 ASSESSED WITH P586 Parcel History: Date Doc# Vol/Page Type 07/23/1997 1047/613 QC 07/23/1997 912/592 07/23/1997 812/529 Plat: *=Primary Tract: (S-T-R 40%150%) Block/Condo Bldg: *01-058-BOARDMAN VILLAGE OF 026-1867 19-30N-18W 02 LOT 02 2014 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 0 Valuations: Last Changed: 09/27/2011 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason COMMERCIAL G2 0.125 13,400 183,100 196,500 NO Totals for 2014: General Property 0.125 13,400 183,100 196,5000 Woodland 0.000 0 Totals for 2013: General Property 0.125 13,400 183,100 196,5000 Woodland 0.000 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch M Specials: User Special Code Category Amount II Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 r � FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, DECISION AND ORDER OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ST. CROIX COUNTY-, WISCONSIN Case: 39-96 Complete Application Received: 5/02/96 Hearing Date: 5/23/96 and 6/27/96 . Dates of Publication: Weeks of 5/06/96 and 5/13/96 and Weeks of 6/10/96 and 6/17/96 FINDINGS OF FACT Having heard all the testimony, considered the entire record herein, and conducted an on-site inspection, the Board finds the following facts: 1 . The applicant is David James Meister, whose address is 1402 County Road A, New Richmond, Wisconsin 54017. 2 . The applicant, on May 2, 1996, filed with the Zoning Office an application for a variance request for a setback from a county road. 3 . David James Meister is the owner of the property which is the subject of this application which is located in part of the SEX of the SEX of Section 19, T30N, R18W, Town of Richmond, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. 4 . The subject property is currently used for a commercial business bar and grill . 5 . The Town of Richmond supports this application. 6 Nelson stated this was a request for a setback variance from a county road. David James Meister, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 1357 County Road A, New Richmond, Wisconsin. 7 . Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a site plan identifying the new proposed building with a deck and showing the old building to be 20' from County Road A, the old building measuring 50' long with an 8' separation between the old building and the new building (60' x 281 ) ; Exhibit #2, a map of Boardman; Exhibit #3 , correspondence from the Town of Richmond recommending approval . Nelson stated that this doesn' t meet the 133 ' setback requirement because it is not a conforming structure. 8 . Bradley asked Nelson if he supported this application. Nelson stated yes, only because the addition is to the bertk,,side of the structure. Nelson noted this is a corner lot and.�.cannot meet the setback averaging. 9 . Bradley noted that precedence is in Meister' s favor. 10 . Meister stated he is adding a banquet room for meetings, SACROIX COUNTY �. � WISCONSIN ZONING OFFICE I INN"NI p• Noun ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER �.;. - - 1101 Carmichael Road ,. •.• _- w�____T_ �� Hudson, WI 54016-7710 (715) 386-4680 August 26, 1996 David James Meister 1402 County Road J New Richmond, WI 54017 RE: Board of Adjustment Decision File Ref: 39-96 Dear Mr. Meister: The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has reviewed your application for a setback variance to a county road and has approved your application with conditions. The enclosed document is the formal decision regarding your application. If you have any questions, please give our office a call . Sincerely, Thomas C. Nelson Zoning Administrator db Enc. cc: Janice Ball, Clerk Town of Richmond 1121 - 130th Avenue New Richmond, WI 54017 E3 1 . This decision expires on June 27, 1997 . No construction may begin or continue after this date unless an extension is granted in writing by the Board of Adjustment prior to the expiration date. 2 . The applicant must complete this project according to the plans submitted. Minor changes in the project must be submitted to and approved in writing by the Zoning Office before the project starts or continues . Major changes must be brought back to the Board of Adjustment for review and approval . 3 . The applicant is responsible for obtaining any permit or approval required for the project by municipal, town or county zoning ordinances or by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before starting the project . 4 . The applicant must provide confirmation that he/she has completed permit process with all other regulatory agencies. 5 . The applicant must allow free and unlimited access to the project site at any reasonable time to any Zoning Office employee who is overseeing the project' s construction, operation, or maintenance. 6 . The Board of Adjustment may change or revoke this decision if the project becomes detrimental to the public interest . 7 . The applicant must keep a copy of this decision at the project site at all times until the project has been completed. 8: Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator, shall be notified prior to beginning the project. Call him at (715) 386-4680 so that compliance inspections can be made. 9 . Applicant is to black top or hard surface areas which service the public and employees. 10 . Applicant is to meet all State regulations for food and health codes . 11 . Accepting this decision and beginning the project means that the applicant has read, understands, and agrees to follow all conditions of this decision. birthday parties, etc. Nelson noted this request is of a commercial nature. Meister stated he wants to put a full basement underneath. 11. Bradley asked Meister how long he has owned the bar. Meister stated five years in August. 12 . Nelson noted the well on the property needed abandonment. Meister noted the underground system was all concrete. 13 . Bradley asked Meister if he wanted to expand his business. Meister stated yes. 14 . Jensen inquired about parking. Meister said if he needed more he would get rid of his volleyball courts. CONCLUSION OF LAW The Board Concludes that: 1. The Board of Adjustment has authority under Section 17 .70 (5) (c) 3 to approve or deny an application for a variance. 2 . Section 17 . 64 (1) (c) requires a setback from a Class C Highway to be 133 ' from the centerline of said highway. 3 . A literal enforcement of the terms of the Zoning Code would result in unnecessary hardship to the applicant because there are no other alternatives and a hardship exists. 4 . A variance would not be contrary to the public interest and would be in accord with the spirit of the Zoning Code because the purpose of the ordinance is to promote public safety, general welfare and convenience. 5. The variance is requested due to limiting physical characteristics of the property because no other alternatives exist and the proposed structure will not be built any closer to the road than the existing structure. DECISION On the basis of the above Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and the record herein, the Board approves the applicant's request for a setback variance from a county road on the following vote: Chairman Bradley yes A. Jensen yes C. Mehls yes G. Menter yes with the following conditions: R APPEAL RIGHTS This decision may be appealed by any person aggrieved by filing an action in certiorari in the circuit court of this County within 30 days after the date of filing shown below. The County assumes no liability for and makes no warranty as to the legality of any construction commenced prior to the expiration of this 30-day period or the identity of any person who may claim to be aggrieved by this decision. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Singed - -- Chairperson Dated: 8/26/96 Filed: 8/26/96 rV, i'M lvr( W e e Ae) Al or Co, A/rI(JI M / LL (5 T `*' t V v r I i l I r O N � 0 fA o o N 4 o C 0 �.. O O CL N N W O N N t0 O w A ( ! CL o a (D y - (D a N L 0 �L m mvt 3 H 3� o �O m._00 �m c �rn�'v (D [r m E L EEZ'u`� coX 4) L) m a� o f0wc3 y a v > � Z ° oM mma) I m U li c O c O >` c Y L 3 �_ Of N a ) y O 'O E > Q N w o f0 3 0 I � y I Z H o LIJ = O z d m rn H LU a m I oz aci a C w � NHr- o U � I N d I C •plea, m L f0 L 0 Q ° O z z N m m I m o o m Y o o a` N > m c H Fes- �i E 3 •N m � aaa a � 7 o N !I N n M .5 U Z OR Z Q �_ 6 M — 0 O II m C 'p yl Q t'n a d O Q Z (n O �j O0 3 r 1—yA C 0 IV C LO OD woo H i M L N q1 O W -� • o o Z o ir Z y € a • a ` a Z u m c t A ua � oaici