Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
018-2017-10-000
Wisconsin Department of Commerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM County: St. Croix Safety and Building Division INSPECTION REPORT sanitary Permit No: 574349 0 GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) State Plan ID No: Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes[Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Parcel Tax No: Oevering Homes LLC, aka Cievering Pro ertie I Hammond, Town of 018-2017-10-000 CST BM Elev: Insp.BM Elev: BM Description: Section/Town/Range/Map No: /60 • Z 65T 35.29.17. 1131 TANK INFORMATION ELEVATION DATA TYPE MANUFACTURER �f� CAPACITY STATION BS HI FS ELEV. lj. 3 b5. .166 • Z Septic j , �oQ Benchmark 5. , j o6.3 f t:J F:•� � D D. Dosing 7 / Alt.BM O (p 0 J Bldg.Sewer es�- C� �� � J z •°! q 1. Holding St/Ht Inlet � \ TANK SETBACK INFORMATION X SUHt Outlet TANK TO P/L WELL BLDG. Ven Air I ke ROAD Dt Inlet ! �J Septic _ I ^ ' L Dt Bottom / / Dosing NNE}^ ' ,7J5.' 1-75 Header/Man. l �67 S 2. 1 1-4,3- 41 Aeration +� Dist. Pipe Z • ( 16 3 -4j Holding ot. System g Z. g /aZ _ 7 Final Grade / 1[,4 PUMP/SIPHON INFORMATION jj Manufacturer I Demand St Cover Zd e[ l4/.„ GPM Model Number 6AJ 1 5":!) 7,4 0 V�. r TDH Liftl O Friction Lomas System He d TDH Ft I, g Forcemain Length Dia. Dist.to Well '.75 ZD Z SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM s•BED/TRENCH Width ! Length No.Of rench s PIT DIMENSIONS No.Of Pits Inside Dia. Liquid Depth DIMENSIONS Ll SETBACK SYSTEM TO P/L BLDG WELL LAKE/STREAM LEACHING Manufacturer: INFORMATION , CHAMBER OR Type Of m: 34 I UNIT Model Number: e J , I DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM °'' Header/Manifold Distribution / x Hole Size // x Hole Spacing ! Ven Air Int ke Pipes) 11� Length Dia Length Dia Spacing SOIL COVER x Pressure Systems Only xx Mound Or At-Grade Systems Only Depth Over Depth Over xx Depth of 1xxSeeded/Sodded xx Iched BedlTrench Center I Bed/Trench Edges Topsoil f `i! No Yets j No `\ COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies,persons present,etc.) Inspection#1:// /3/ Inspectio42: ATLocation: 1918 66th Ave B dwi WI 54002(SW 1/4 NW 1/4 35 T29N R17W) Croix Hills 1 t 10 4-Z arcel No: 35.29.17. 1.)Alt BM Description= / a 2.)Bldg sewer length= /a0 G�ea•. p Jl- �— -amount of cover= r al S1 X 75 -o a NPlan revision Required. = Yes I (n Use other side for additional information. �'-� -- Date Insepcto Signatur Cert.No. SBD-6710(R.3/97) . . 00e®0®D®000080oao 0898®88000 ®©0��� - . _ Mon 088888800600©0000 .. . .: �00080800�00®080 0000000000©000000 0 . .. Bull oago a®©along a . 1©®8888 Doug ago along 000©0118810 P ,soon©ac8080060060 . 0 08880 0880088000 =8111010111 along 000©©© 18000800000 ©®®©000880000o - ©®000080000000000 - M81110110111111 000 0ao000o©ooa000000 . . ©000eooa000000000 _ ©000800000000000 08on00o©0a0000000 00000000a000000ao = : . . :: . oo®a00000000a0000 80088008088800088 - ©888808088888808 �������������■ D0©00888080888808 0 ONE /�►�/■ _ �008080�����0Dun �N MEMEM��I1MEN■ - ©®0©8080008880000 ■■MPP2 Milo N/ ®808800�8�800��0 01 IN 2,m / MANI 5►•9/.5■ . - ' 0©0800 ©000000880 �■i/�/�■��I�/',,�.s _ - - . EVA iii���i���� �r,r�•i��� Em/%NE//./M///./II//I�/I/l U1■I 1AWA ® _ PLOT PLAN PROTECT Oeverina Homes ADDRESS 1433 Cernohous Ave Suite A New Richmond W 54017 SW 1/4 NW 1/4S 35 /T 29 N/R 17 W TOWN Hammond COUNTY ST.CROIX MPRS Shaun Bird 226900 DATE 7/21/14 BEDROOM 3 CONVENTIONAL IN-GROUND PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK MOUND XXX SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1000 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE 630 HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE 1.0 ABSORPTION AREA 456 # of chambers none BENCHMARK V.R.P. Top of 3/4" pvc pipe ASSUME ELEVATION 100' Filter BEAR Filter ❑ BOREHOLE O WELL *H.R.P, Same as Benchmark Property Line SYSTEM ELEVATION 102.2 2.5'Sand lift! All piping shall be SDR 30/34,within 10' Driveway to 66th St. of tank,piping shall be Schedule 40. Well is to meet all WDNR setbacks Pro 3 Bedroom 511' Property Line House 684' Property Line Tank is to be properly bedded and provided with lockdown covers with approved warning Huffcutt Please note: This lot was originally lot 1, labels Combo Tank NKA lot 10. Leroy Jansky did a onsite and a interpritive determination was done. Area 15' below system Leroy's approval is included with the original soil test. Also, a new lot map is is to remain attached showing the approved system undisturbed. location. B M 4% Slope ❑ B-3 98' B- 1 Diversion Ditch 99' 99.7' ❑ B-2 100' Property Line Safety and Buildings Division County rio 1 ; 'rA 201 W.Washington Ave.,P.O.Box 7162 sanitary Permit Nmnb-(w be fined in by Co.) 61. ROIXr(oLiNTY StacTreasectionNumber :,or�I�Au"41--� ermit Application In accordance with SPS 38321(2),Wis.Adm.Code,submission of"form to the appropriate governmental unit is required prior to obtaining a seoAKY Permit- Note:Application forms for sterna-owned POWTS are sublet d to PR= diffrdcat then mailing address) the Department of Safety and Professional Servics. Perso®al information You Provide may be used for sccondarY _f in we ordanoe with the Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)CMI Stets. �� 64 L A lication Information-Please Print All Informatio / Parool# property owner's Name 2 Prw Is Mailing Address Property l ocamon I/3 1 i / J Govt lot `/ r Cnr,Stan zip Phone Number �_�/., 1/. Section �J tAj Val k aria ' r TN; R�E II.Type of Building(check all that apply) / Subdivision Name 2 Family Dwelling-Number of Bedrooms ♦ G 0k. c �'Vp Blck# o ❑Public/Commercial-Describe Use ❑City of CSM Number ❑Village of ❑State Owned-Describe Use l- Town of � � // lNlo✓ III.Type of Permit: ( on Complete line B if applicable) a +_ X A. Systern ❑ Treatment/Holding Tank Replacement only ❑Other Modification to Existing System(-PI—) B. ❑Permiit Renewal ❑Permit Revision ❑Change of Plumber �errmit Tramsfer to New mit List Previous Per Numbs and Date Issued Before Expiration T of POWTS S stem/Com nent/Device: Check aU that apply) on-Pressurized In-Ground ❑Pressmized In-Ground ❑At-Grade ❑Mound 2:24 um.of suitable soil Mound<24 in,of suitable soil ❑Holding Tank ❑Ohba DisPeasal Component(expo) ❑pretreanneut Device(0q)Iam) / V.Dis rsal/Trea ant Area Information: Dispersal Area (yI) Elevation J Design Flow(gpd) Design Soil Application dsf) Dispersal Area VL Tank Info in Total #of Manufacturer Gallop Gallons Units o New Tanks Exi-9 T . - Septic a Holding Tank T Dosing Clamber VII Responsibility Statement- a andenigaed,as$= nwbmlity for instattation of the POWTS down oa the attached Plana. Plumber's erne(Print S Plumber MP/IvIPRB Number Business Phone Number ; �.` > > Plumber's Address(Street,City.State,Zip CkL LU SrL, VIII oun /De artment Use On Perm//it Fee Date issued Issuing t Signature wed rs S '3 ❑ ea Reason Denial iX CondN1 I s far, isapproval 3� J ( y„�( .� !�s ✓.`�.Q.. 1 id'tank efflubnt alt®r anal -a J�4:�•�'t��r��c.� :rt�o!fv�n h`oYt aiiOeml cell must all be services/mairitair d w es per management plan provided by plumber. n �g ! a e- t� ants must be m4intained Z hem 4)l +—,`vr� r A as per ioplica i*`codf`%ordinances. Attwb to cpmpyxt plum for d-syatesm as d sabsolt to the Co only a papa not Ins tlnn s mn z 71 ise]mn is six SBD-6398(R 11/11) naTaro DIVISION OF INDUSTRY SERVICES o 141 NW BARSTOW ST FL 4TH WAUKESHA WI 53188-3789 ° •e Contact Through Relay w www.dsps.wi.gov/sb/ 4G www.wisconsin.gov ° ssFo'snL��� Scott Walker,Governor Dave Ross,Secretary August 15,2014 CUST ID No. 226900 A7TN.•POWTS Inspector SHAUN R BIRD ZONING OFFICE BIRD PLUMBING INC ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1432 120TH ST 1101 CARMICHAEL RD NEW RICHNlON ID WI 54017 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES;W,1512016 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No.2442697 SITE: Site ID No. 804700 Oevering Homes Please refer to both identification numbers, 1918 66TH Ave above,in"correspondence with the Town of Hammond St Croix County SWl/4,NWl/4, S35,T29N,R17W FOR: Description:Mound Object Tye:POW TS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1496711 Maintenance required; 450 GPD Flow rate; 15 in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade; System(s): Mound Component Manual-Ver. 2.0, SBD-10691-P(N.01/01,R. 10/12),Pressure Distribution Component Manual-Veer.2.0,SBD-10706-P(-N.01101,R. 10/12); Effluent Filter The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with any component manual(s) referenced above. The owner,as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes,is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per s.145.06, stats. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with the"Mound Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems VERSION 2.0" SBD-10691-P(N.e/O1,R 10/12)and the"Pressure Distribution Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Treatment System sI N 2.0" SBD-10706-P(N.01/01,R 10/12). �p pR ?AP pp 41 P� T ®V4 The building sewer and distribution network piping shall be of material listed i-Af4. 1 s / 5, Wis. Adm. Code. 1, # '40' In the event this soil absorption system or any of its component parts malfte a health hazard, the property owner must follow the contingency plan as described in the dition,the owner must comply with the operation, maintenance and monitoring duties as descII of the mound component manual.A rop y of this information must be given to the owner u the project. All holding/treatment tanks are to comply with SPS 384.25(7)(a). SHAUN R BIRD Page 2 8/15/2014 Maintenance information must be given to the owner of the tank explaining that periodic cleaning of the filter is required. Access to the filter for cleaning must be provided per SPS 384 product approval conditions. A Sanitary Permit must be obtained from the county where this project is located in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 145.135 and 145.19, Wis. Stats. Inspection of the private sewage system installation is required. Arrangements for inspection shall be made with the designated county official in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 145.20(2)(d),Wis. Stats. Owner Responsibilities: • SPS 383.52 Responsibilities. The owner of a POWTS shall be responsible for ensuring that the operation and maintenance of the POWTS occurs in accordance with this chapter and the approved management plan under s. SPS 383.54(1). • SPS 383.52(2) A POWTS that is not maintained in accordance with the approved management plan or as required under s. SPS 383.54(4)shall be considered a human health hazard. • SPS 383.55 The owner is responsible for submitting a maintenance verification report acceptable to the county for maintenance tracking purposes. Reports sha11 be submitted at intervals appropriate for the component(s) utilized in the POWTS. A copy of the approved plans,specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department,which may include local inspectors. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. In granting this approval the Division of Industry Services reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building,structure,or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below,or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter and the POWTS management plan to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation,operation or maintenance of the POWTS. Sincerel , Fee Required$ 250.00 This Amount Will Be Invoiced. When You Receive That Invoice, Julia Lewis-Osborne Please Include a Copy With Your POWTS Reviewer 2 ,Integrated Services Payment Submittal. (262)397-6005, Fax:(608)283-7481 WiSI4 f� 76 ; julia.lewis @wisconsin.gov Note: Effective January 1, 2012, all codes under the jurisdiction of the Division of Industry Services (formerly Safety&Buildings)will be modified. Code references with prefixes starting with"Comm"have been replaced with"SPS"to recognize the relocation of the Division of Industry Services from the former Department of Commerce to the Departnlent of Safety&Professional Services. Additionally,all IS (formerly S&B)codes have been renumbered and addressed in a"300" series. For future reference,the Wisconsin Commercial Building Code will be addressed by SPS Chapters 360-366. I RECEIVED Cover Page JUL 2 5 2014 INDUSTRY SERVICES Shaun Bird Bird Plumbing Inc. 1432 120th St. New Richmond Wi 54017 715-246-4516 Date: 7/21/14 Owner:Oevering Homes Location:SW1/4 NW1/4 S35 T29 N,R 17W 191866th Ave Hammond Manuals Used: Mound Component Manual Version 2.0 (01/31) Pressure Distribution Manual Version 2.0 (01/31) Page# 1. Cover Page 2. Mound Plot Plan 3. Mound Cross Section 4. Pipe Cross Section/Pipe Layout 5. Pump Chamber Cross Section 6. Pump Curve 7-8. Maintance and Contigency plan 9-16. Soil test 17. Filter Specifications and ross section Shaun Bird Signature 'Y License number 0 �'qN D �YSvlce �R��CFS ,�SpoND�N PLOT PLAN PROJECT Oeverina Homes ADDRESS 1433 Cernohous Ave Suite A New Richmond Wi 54017 SW 1/4 NW 1/4S 35 /T 29 N/R 17 W TOWN Hammond COUNTY ST.CROIX MPRS Shaun Bird 226900 DATE 7/21/14 BEDROOM 3 CONVENTIONAL IN-GROUND PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK MOUND XXX SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1000 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE 630 HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE 1.0 ABSORPTION AREA 456 # of chambers none IL BENCHMARK V.R.P. Top of 3/4" pvc pipe ASSUME ELEVATION 100' Filter BEAR Filter ❑ BOREHOLE O WELL *H.R.P. Same as Benchmark Property Line SYSTEM ELEVATION 102.2 2.5'sand lift! AC All piping shall be SDR 30/34,within 10' Driveway to 66th St. of tank,piping shall be Schedule 40. od- Well is to meet all WDNR setbacks Pro 3 Bedroom 511' Property Line House 684' Property Line Tank is to be properly bedded and provided with lockdown covers with approved warning Huffcutt Please note: This lot was originally lot 1, labels Combo Tank NKA lot 10. Leroy Jansky did a onsite and a interpritive determination was done. Area 15' below system Leroy's approval is included with the original soil test. Also, a new lot map is is remain attached showing the approved system undisturbed. location. B.M.* 4% Slope 0 B-3 9 8' B- 1 Diversion Ditch 99, 99.7' ❑ B-2 100' Property Line Mound System Cross Se-dio'n and Plan View a ► D�emIOH F Ct g , Y J B f„ F t D � T A R E i F - W G Z H J E k I b I - t J ........... K , . .... . ..:: 7 L WL> wrw�..rir.Y+.'iw y r.yir'ri iii.^ %rw••wwari'%r�-iWF.riYW;A�fr err,iiYr;tir.ar rr-ww viwai•wr'..r:rrr-,+r„r.:.n,'�i` W K 1 B 1 Z Sl© % L j k"1 1 =Topsoil =ASTM C-33 =Clean aggregate =4 in. sch. 40 pvc Cap Material sand fill '/z to 2 '/a in. dia. 0 observation pipe GeotextileH .,a r Fabric F F M -Ft D E Plowed Surface Ft Contour Slope Direction GENERAL INSTALLATION: The mound area is staked out along the design contour. Existing vegetation is mowed and raked off the site. The mound basal area(L x W) is plowed with a moldboard or chisel plow. Plowing may not proceed if the soil is wet enough at the plow depth to form a'A inch soil wire when a sample is rolled between the palms of the hands. ASTM C-33 quality sand is placed immediately after plowing. Sand is placed with a tracked machine keeping 12 or more inches of sand under the tracks or is placed overhead by a backhoe. Special care must be used when placing sand of less than one foot thickness to minimize compaction of the plowed surface. After the topsoil cap is placed, the entire mound is seeded and mulched to promote vegetative growth, limit erosion and protect from freezing. The observation pipes are slotted in the lower 6 inches and secured in place with rebar or a closet flange. i 10/071gj Page of Pressure Lateral Layout One Lateral — End Manifold o Threaded Cleanout Lateral Turn-up --0 Plug Force Main X --} L Long Sweep 90 Bend: Pressure System Coustr•ctiou Distribution-Network S i cations Lateral Diameter In. Laterals am constructed of Schedule 40 PVC Orifice Diameter L In. pipe. Orifices are drilled perpendicular to X Orifice Spacing) In. the pipC with a sharp drill bit and face down. L(Lateral Len Ft. Laterol turn-ups tertninate with a threaded Force Main Diameter m, cleanout plug and are enclosed in a 6.8 inch Force Main 50 Ft. diaxieter lawn Winkler valve box accessible . fronAnished grade. • • • • • Grade • • • • • • • • • • • • • 6-8 Inch Lawn .. Sprinkler Valve Box 03/05lgj Page of i $epic-Dose Tank• Cross SaWon And Pump Pafmmn= Sipee fiCAtions Tank Ian PUMP Teak Model Numba� E 0 Nurgbar �' Total Ta&Capatd + �(j Alarm Ma i mar c Max.Bury Depdt t Al=M aM»bar SvFft*ape Filer Maw 6ZL. TOW dead(I'DH)-Feet Fibw Model Nuanber Elm Dietafi Ndwv&Lode S� Min pmp ltequirod Fame Msis Lacs Ft TDH Total �• O utw 4"Above &With Maatis Min.4"Above Grade Locking Dviioe. b*h mbulo Sew+ wo Lode Device <6"Bdo w Sealed W jumc m Boot . _ r ti,i� err 'm w man rw w .� r �71ifyD Vast Min. 12" Dieoonnea Above C3rads Means • Wkb vast cap► Oudd Filter ""`.►....,a _ - Wet f. "• .;: r� A. yi f 3w��ah d ►° Weep Tank Vokme GPI r R Hole Vobmw Gall. A; S 6 . > . ( Eiavadon C a B; a ° •; r.: a. Ft .. :. Ekavation D; 'S .,r, .;. ( 9 Ft Total ..• �� �:s..•s•�a• i. �i'•1•} •. ''';'�i..s'a'�' •':'i'rr.'i'r�f'fii•:'i•:' 'i'•'} f•i• .i'i►f ` '' s'•' •• r...r... OffAU ATM: Tire septic/dc w .taok is bedded and $lMd as a WA tba r not G� of biaY as by tide iwmu may manufacoso�s p - sn bdit drike(CXPWW be exceeded w 1 °C°'� t mt�eelsl,oQeee�etged tc tire,tank nth wa> at&taage,sect ine�lLed, Pipiog rt the mle�t and a u of tam 4,S*40 p'VC m bridge the teak laid as so&soo tD pffew soft of 300 aad Cohn 16Z.M=Vsd=��e.deeire.g ee�iad.w •:g�`:e�+�°oeeptr°'e waih�; pa of 02105 IJ . . �ff�c�ent 4/10 hp Submersible Effluent Pump, 3/4" Solids LI • re 0 so 100 ISO 200 250 35 11 i p 1 ��� • Lie. .I Thwu•fi' II 20 wet, 0 20 40 60 so t" 1. 0".- k E + l�� Ar r ru E , do orralrWin alwatric StrW,Blufftw%IN 46714 40C)EWt:r• 'v e FOM WOO 7-11 wwvLftw*wH"cUiGcoM _ 7 { P©WT'S100MM'S MANUAL A MANAGEMENT PLAN Pa" ----._ot F'M»R 11QN SPE IMm- Owner o e r Teak Pam*#. r* ". , Sapac Tank Wm*i*ror O NA NA BMtreatfftr Urftrf�eattsw O NA MtsttbrtcafMe*MQj ns NNN ttentf er i t" O MA Pv mp-Tank� G O PIA Nkolu .. Pur- Tank N11agr urger t O.NA #ow �d x 1.5) O NA SW Race Pam Model c S, U O NA ktiltre rrt ckn*, is'nsinealnn�rtt Lk* NA FSK CWK a (FOG) s0o 00L N3 t�ne>IQr4vet Bret a Peat Filer Mochdrltiael Llemand ( � Cl�iAwalian Q VV*ft d TOM Strepewtded Solos (M) stN v a trt a a Wuhan"OM"0 mend (ice aO ng/L. Q bl"Vo tnd(WWAM O kvipaund(preswrl ed) TOW Suspended Solids (I SV a*mg& 0 ;Mound slfi`CW100a l a a odw.. MmW mum EMLvW Parlide Size K itchdarneter M to M 40cd rbr pRVww waftwM. Service ev"t _e .ko Fsrquewcy c1�#ank(s) At fit onm wary J 0 Kxm s) *�ym.) Pwnp out M of twNs) 1t hft vied skWq*and soon equals one•d"(Q at tank vokxne 1rt ct dieptina .oeM(s) At legit once ey+ry O retorat+s oear(s) ok*mcraar ym) C�eacrt# er At bpstcAOa tNSr�r © s) legyaect pump &alarm At ieset ar�rpe s rry O rrrOWO s) O NA nwhil and press"test At bwt a-m emy O etiorttlta s) 0 NA At least.onoa evory D mmtlhs O yeer(s) D NA At lad once w*wy O moms ❑yaw($) Q NA #AS iShi PASTRUCTIOrNS !pl eft l i of triw" 4sp t"aft W Ml t*made by m kx%Mgrt carrft am off*foNarrigp*mwes or trMr Mae4er'ftrtbsr;Master Pltrlr ` PtlAffs krsQecbr,MyYKtS ;S�epltlpe 91 1110mv Oprpbr. Tank kamw*"Est kw6j a s vbw k""Com esf#0 bro"to kw*gm 16 io or hvtaae br+dMSe!-6 wW a asks or inks,ntaeiserrr the vattrme ofoipq)bierd Skidgs add mx=anal tb do*for ary back rep a(porvra 1of eOmd oRthe ground sur few. The 3 NM be vlsumly iwpeded to chat*rte eltuera bvsis iA ttte abeer,rabatt pipes arid to deck for any perl&p of pwj p ground sur(aoe. Take pooft oftftwnt on the V*WW Swkwe mey w4c**atmftVoxxftn and rsrlt*ee 1ho inarneriiwle poet of the ktcat atagute�toKy ao�tttorlgr. When the wmblrwad aoeuntulation of atudge and scram in my taw* oc�-eac�d(X,)or sq of -mac yokum.O e eMfne Contents of rite tank shalt be'renw ed by a Sep4ge;8io�rtaicln�,�Ord dispoead of In smog ftloe with ch. NR 11*Vft mk Code., The srvicing of*Much Oars. or�POWTS Casa ponents.pretreatlrraertt oner�mn;w ft.and any olw a aance or morftriv at Awvskof 12 tnaniim ar iaa chart be prfaeer d by a cerl lM d POWTS Mme. A serW*report:shM be provided to the load modalmy*AhqM f v4ft 14 days of coo ripwion of any aw wwa event. i STASW UP AND OPERATION For new condruction. prior to use of the POWT'S ctie&b rt tanks)for the presenca of pmduc is or other cheanicats that may impede the bvetenent proaees and�►or du nags In dispersal oeti O tt high are detected have the contents of the huggs).removed by a septoga servb*V operator price to rase. Pope of" START UP AND OPERATION tatnk(s? pr n0e of painting products or oduer ctterNcar thO For new�•prior� use of� POWTS Check see detaoted hews the content*dWpstsal may impede the treatment pr's and�Or ditni��u ceNts). If� ooncartt SW". tank(*)removed by a"P"serofcing Verew prior System stag up shaa not occur when sdi conditions we frozen at the ini slue is restored the wwass� will by During power 0kA*W s pump tanks may 1111 above rorrnai in the backup or surfW*discharge of efltuerd• discharged to the dispe the oe1Ke)and array rseult real oeN(a)in one dose, t� � a ��� Operator prior to restorirq power to this To avoid this sWWMon have the content of the PM � assist� �operating � pump oontror to restore normal levels sft)usnt pump or contact a Plumber or pOWTS MWnW ar the area within within the pump tank. disturb or compact, Do not drive or park vehicles over tanks and dispersal keys. Do not drive or park over,or�t>etvdse 15 Joel down slope Of any mound or at-grade soil absorption area• the fife of the POVM:we the Wbrnwrm OW jw*IwV Reduction or ellminsdon of the foilowing irom the waatVwSW&#earn may ImPI darRal floes; dMp�� �� J� Ioundetion dreln antlbfotkati: baby vrlpss� dgand butt; oorudasrts: r; herbicides; � ; mulc"W s; oN: paining produc* (sump pump) water, fruit vsD softener brine.pesticides;senitery nepkl tampons ABANDONMENT shag be taken to insure that the system b propeifY When the POWTS falls andfor is permenentlY taken out of service the%fiowIng stieps and am*abandoned In Compliance with chapter Comm 83.33,WWconsin Administrative Code: • All piping t0 is *and *bait be drCOnnected and the abandwisd pipe 8 tsoesWd. • The contents of all tanks and pits shag be m mw ad and properly disposed of by a SAP"SGndcft Qpe�' • After pumping, aN tanks and pits Shea be excavated and removed or their covers removed and the void space tilled with s$ll, gravel or another Inert wild nudsrtai. CONTINGENCY PLAN ng measures have been, or muM be taken, to provide a code compilod If the POWTS fair and cannot be repefred the replacement system: a replacement soA absorption syetepn. D A sultabfe repisoement area has been 019d i� � r � st,toufd not be InErh>ped upon by requh0d The repiaoemant area should be pt+otected t area will result in the neled setbacks from existing and proposed structure,lot amts and weer. Failure to epipo true t eyel e��*with the ruler{in for a new aofi and site evaluation to establish a sultabie repiaroertrorrt area. RepN�oernsM yatems effect at that time. advances in POWTS technology a ❑ A suitable rspr�oemsnt�Is not availattle due to setback POWTS.rr s. 9arrin9 holding tank may be Installed as a test resort to replace the ftdied —424X, efts has not been evaluated to identify a stdtable tepbloement> Upon failure of Itte PpNY�8 a s*and bens►�88 must be performed to locate a suitable r*Pbxsmwlt area. If no replacement area is avaitabk a holdMag fardC�N a last resort to replace the foaled POWTS. removal of the Monet at the kAtrathve Mound and e1jr8de soil absorp On sY �� �b n piece tkWM surface. Rec onstrucuons of such syeterns <NIIARNINa» ANDIOR INSUFFICIENT OXYGEN. DO 401 SEPTIC,PUMP AND OTHER TREATMENT TANKS MAY CONTAIN LETHAL.t3A8SNgS DIIA MAY R28ULT. RESCUE O A ENTER A SEPTIC,PUMP OR OTHER TREA7Wff TANK UNDER FROM THE INTERIOR OF A TANK BE 01"ICULT OR IWK Ii1�ANCES. ADDITIONAL COMiII{ENTS AMER POWTS INSTALLER PCYMVTS OWNT Z-"w, / -- Name S Phone '- Phone sIEPTAGE SERVICING OP TOR(PUN LOCAL REGULATORY Name Name ) t! �- Phone Phone '�� , S= This document 00 dmW In canpilance with chapter SPS 383.22M(bX1)(d)&(fl and 363.54(t),(2) (3),Wisoorwin A*r***dW•Cods. %woman SOIL EVALUATION R T 01W4 Depaknentcf CMMMS in axondanoe w>drsrora worw. Paps 1 of 3 oivieion of So"and i9n"ngs ���;�• Sbers sal sondes,Inc. Attach oonrplele sM pion on x in Was. ` St.Croix inciuds,but not limited b: t.09 percent slope,scab or dlnnrrelons,rrorM in rreafast road. -7—10-tZLA P ~P��6iifli (.CROIX CO�NTM UMe Fennel bdbrrrrsson You F�May be and for eaoondny F F 0 s 18.04 i /2 Property Owner Propnty Location French Homes,Inc. Govt.Lot na SW1/4,NW1/4,535,T29N R17W Property Owners Moiling Address Lot (� Blodr# Subd.Name or CSW P.O.Box 350 T/ na Croix Hills At i7' 0�' Coy SUM Zip Code Phone Number ❑ City [J MUP® Town Neared Road Roberts I WI 1 54023 715-718-2929 Hammond I 190Th St ®New Ccna UcWn Use-. ® RwadentW/Number d be&oome 4 Code derived deep flow rate 800 GPD ❑Rwwwffwt ❑ Public or cormnerdal-Denxibe: na Parent ms/erial Silly sediment and tundafiying reddish sandy loam till Food plan ebvation,if apple" no ft. Genend conwrients Mound Design,system elevation 101.8511 based on contour Pine elevation 100.108.No deviation from site and reconnendefions: area wIth out fast contacting sod tester due to poor&W conditions r• , F-1 Boring# ® Ground wrfaoe ebv. 100.20 R. Depth to IkniHrg factor 19 ✓ goy Application Ri Hodson Depth Dominant Color Raft Dow"on Texturo Sbuduro Consistence Boundary Rods QPDMX in. Murael Qu.Sz.Cont.Cobr Gr.SL Sh. '!halt 'EM2 1 0-10 10yr3/2 none so 2msbk mfr cs 1vf .6 .8 2 10-19 10yr4/4 none sd 2rrrsbk mfr gw rte .4 .6 3 19.48 10yr4/4 c2d 7.5yr5/6 sd 2msbk mfr no na .4 .6 2 18oftl# ®El Ground surface sislr. 100.20 >L Depth to lbrridn9 factor 15 ✓in. goy Apps Rant Horizon Depth Dw&wrt Color Redox Desctiption Texhue Skucturo Boundary Roots Gam' in. Munsed Qu.Sr-Cord.Cobr Gr.Sz Sh. Teti 'Eae2 A-r 1 o-9 10yr3/2 none I 2msbk mfr a ivf .6 .8 i (P 2 9-15 10yr4/4 none 9d 2msbk mfr 9w na .4 .6 3 15-27 10yr4/4 f2d 7.5yr5/6 Sd 2msbk mfr 9w na .4 .6 4 27-48 10yr4/4 c2d 7.5yr5/6 9d om mfr na na .0 .0 "Eft!MA#1 SODS>30<220 mgA.and TSS>30<150 MA 'Effluent#2=SODS<_30 m9A.and TSS 1.30 rngli. CST Name(Pisses Print) CST Number David J.Steel 248956 Address SMafs Soil Service, Date Evaluation Conducted Tebphons Number 984 200th St.Baldwin,WI 54002 11/22J2M 715-760.0347 1804Mne.67aM t Pmoe"yOwner French 1 Free,It1C. Parcel ID• Pending Paps 2 of 3 Bonrp# m Ground surface ebv. 98.20 tt. Depth to factor 15 '' in. SollApplicalbon Horizon Depfa Domloant Color Redox Description Texture Saudure Corablowe Boundary Roots GPD,A!' in. Muneelt Qu.Sz Cont Cotes Gr.Sz.Sh. 'tctlst '1!=912 1 0-9 10yr3/2 none I 2msbk mfr a 1vP .6 .8 (p 2 9-15 IOyM/4 none Sid 2msbk mfr 9w na .4 .6 3 15-28 I0yr4/4 fld 7.5yr5/6 sd 2msbk mfr 9w na .4 .6 4 28-48 IOyr4/4 c2d 7.5yr5/6 Sid om mfr na na .0 .0 F—I D ❑ Ground surtaoe a". R. Depth to im&*factor lo. Soll Application Role Herb= Depth Dominard Color Rsdox Description Texture Structure Cortsisience Boundary Roots GPON in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. '�Mt 'tscr2 F] eorinp e ❑ ❑ Ground surface aim. R Depth to WWrq factor lo, Horizon Depth DwOnant Color Redox Description Texture Stru*ye Conaftm Barrxlary Roots WW lo. Mum" Qu.Sr_Corti.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'ENS1 'Ef wd 61=SOD?30<_220 mpll.and TSS>30<_150 n & •EtkwM#t2=SODS<30 mplL.and TSS<_30 mq& The Departrrrent of Commem is an equal opportunity so-vice provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need materiel in an alt mac format,Please contacx the dot at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264.8777. ssnuwntmaol 91 Ir Sds. W,W- STEEL'S SOIL SERVICE INC. 3 of 3 David J.Steel French Homes Inc. 994 200'd St. CST-POWTSM SWl/4,NW1/4,S32,T29N,R17W Baldwin,WI 54002 Lic.#248956 Town of Hammond,St Croix Co. Direct 715-760-0347 Croix Hills Lot, 1 Fax 715-6843449 This soil evaluation was conducted to satisfy a zoning requirement,it may or may not be suitable for your use. The location of this test may or may not be as shown,as permanent lot lines were not established at the time the soli teat was Conducted. Lepa N 1"=40' I ♦ =Benchmark Ele. 100.00 ft Top of 3/4"pvc pipe • =Alt Benchmark Ele. 99.85 ft 0 Top of 3/4"pvc pipe =Borings Boring Elevations A B l = 10020 ft B2= 100.20 ft / B3= 9820 ft 134= 0.00 ft 6 kr I� bun i5'�Au1f0 COUNTY PLAT OR CROIX KILLS 839so� IST ADDITION 35 LOCAL@ N PART OF RE SW 1/4 OF THE Nw 1/4 OF eFmY�Y KAI) SECIM 35,mm a NORIR,RANOE 17 VT. MM OF NA41RIRl,ST.CAGY WIt1TY,MSCMW am OOAOT 1 OF CRX N11S. .t s'$ MR& J 1 wI8 WrA is[CF MA I#-a 114 ! ATION M M252S` Ak(W4M LK MAW ati!> r N 8978'25'E 119113' ! (NOT 10 SGLh _, 117.01' - mr sECarN$T6o6 m2K r2n.15'--10 _ --- Y i cot't I ; 100' a i 1 - 'FyrP IQTl i Pur a I LOT 15 LOT 1C Y6•g754Y LOCAIYN! I 85109$.F. ti 153636$.F. ! 4. 1.95 355 Ac v I: lz o 511.86' I H MET I°( II"O 0 I. IN 0486 w sE I I In.92'1 _ _ o LOT 9 I u k Z ' K4_6B - _ 141.44'- I I I ;59984 S.F. i I Ip I� t1 ~-- _ N 8824'09'E 1 696.12' i I �a 3.67 Ac. mom �°81 Ip o i, N 88 1'09'E 38451' _8I + :mtt— —ptf-'�— I o LOT 11 ' I Leo=IOn.00 O O V pT N I � I ' 2063 00C S.F. 6 o 00 n 234 .c. uo l I I I I a 1j Z. 'V LOT 1� a I 7216 S.F 1f' 0 4 166 Ac DROAGE NEW NOTE I p rraaa�rMaraartwaw ;e ? + IZ LOT 13 n e.eiwaa�axaMlraxnaaa . .,, LOT 14 ^ I _ ( � -. ._s arMrraaMMYCMeYaarrlwla „ N � P 73290 S.F. i - Y 66.00 / ��a MTIaA IgalafS M6M11®gMiaM I! 7, S.F. atttMt alataatMYgrs MMaaO� I' II'o nI I !z / 60.53 ® 301.84' awwrrM WIPMOM iarrrutamrw 1.65IL. I I� 1.68 Ac z % _- --- -u=------------------ ------- tAtM�• amm a9 aeMa Ota alrsn I I - i' awwMMo S 89'4758'W 488.81 GENERAL NME S1ATEliEN1` 0 aawaarrsrNNO0taragYtt I i? ��lu I ; 66TH SE y � — arxroa►rtrtt+aaMarpc j I I lu I / 11 � _---•----�.-__ �? glMx rW11R9.1®g1AO,Ri/r I I I / ,i —, , raMaYaaMaarMlM.vlr alPa o aMarYaraxrxrnwtwwq, I � ! Ix• (° � I / 90M15• � t1TiLP17 EASEII&NTS: S 892510'W ! 'I J 11 j Wj / LEE wit 5, i q told a ratcaaasYamrgvtMtaawx �� I �� IITLt I S i EAM MAW 'a grunYacaor+ga __ trrtlfltaag7uC xgaMYQraYMla ,, ( ®: ' S/ •. 99 of Yta aYrl v mom nail al ' N 00'34'50' YMas waagraMle.fuMnlrnMr I I p -•r .,�,5 Q 1 1 a? S 897510'W arttn•>rMrtMwawr I �c 148,81' � �/ � 1'4 LEGEND: _ aNla•v I { ,.wuiw Maalagq(rgpM11aa1MMMMMt .-YMOMYTIuvs ® NfJ1110upOMTmwa er�naaaxwtauetrssvaaMwe I r.I lttl IutmMOP[ a�ertr at gvrlarMxxlr wra 5;E ........ 4t6 WA MG UOU _ �35.�33I11I MgYAf IAwItMI i/E 30 tM1S1 wtrt OwaG fN+Akf ow howl P.A. mw 6 sm $ on As oaml low a FM 1*FM rN 1114 c0gf01:SM 35 4 FM vc a If to rM "A2X16'36.aPVO ./ 0 TOW I Vf Y If W Ph Ale6 Klyrvwfm7q At ALL IM LOT=05 0 u Yaua r rtaoq q CURVE DATA TABLE: xgsYUY axrlN 4taM q fU sOPNY[ (-ara t tMp gta nq[rgittt iA(O�KCI71'tMOtt Llmlftrt Iqq i 1fLY i fall 'S gaYl't 9 aqY l tt9Yf 11 avlm a:8f aaa IgIR�Ogl011i RHYItYI 1!lIIIlh SAFETY D BUMINka nIV1041nN' �> Servim SUMO INSPECTION REPORT •M►• s4M WWW-ooma> M&-V i. Isb 2U4 Date of inspection: June 7, 2006 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: French NA Ilse: Residential Legal Description: SW, NW,35,29, 17W Site Number. 713333 Subdivision: Croix Hills Soil tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Hammond REC 71roy li M. Gottfried,CST 42258 County: St. Croix O Box 1645 -JUL 24-2006 au Claire,WI 54702-1645 Plan Transaction Number: 12753 Sanitary Permit Number. NA sT.cRoame and Address: French Wastewater Flow: 300-000 gpd PO Box 350 Persons Present: Owner, E. Gottfried, D. Roberts,WI 54023 Steel, R.Yarrington An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified sou tester(CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture,.structure,and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report Soil data verified is as follows: BHP-4 _00-07' 10YR 3/2 sil. 07-11" 10YR 3/3 sil,2msbk parting to pl, mfr,as,w/f1 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 11-19" 10YR 4/4 sil,2msbk,mfr,cw,w/cad 10YR 5/3 and 516 rmfs. 19-24" 7.5YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk,mfr w/c3d 7.5YR 516 and 10YR 5/3 rmfs. BHP-1 • 00-05" 10YR 3/3 sil,2msbk,mfr,aw. 05-09' 10YR 313 sil,2csbk, mfr, as,w/H d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09-12" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2mpl, mfr,cw,w/c2f 10YR 5/3 and 516 rmfs. 12-16' 10YR 4/4 sil,2msbk, mfr w/.c2f 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. BHP-1A 00-08" 10YR 313 sil,2csbk,mfr,cw. 08-09' 10YR 3/2 sil,2fpl, mfr,as,w/fl d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09-13" 10YR 4/2 sil,2mpl,mfr, cw,w/c2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 13-18" 10YR 4/3 sil,2m-cpl, mfr, cw,w/f2d 10YR 5/3 and 516 rmfs. 18-24' 10YR 413 sil,2msbk, mfr w/. f2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. RHEA in action of Lots T 2 and 3 X*..) Lets /I/ r3, /Z) A-If Similar to BHP-4 cad Fe conc in the lower A horizon. Five to six inches of A horizon w/o rmfs. Subsoil below the A horizon has has rmfs. • Page 2 of 2 June 7,2006 Troy French site Lot 8 On-lot 8 at a location approximately midpoint along the proposed system contour and 15 ft up slope conditions were noted to be acceptable to a depth of 15 inches(0-8"10YR 3/3 sil, 8-15"7.5YR 4/4 grscl with no rmfs). of 9 .On lot 9, on the far west end of the proposed system contour the upper 7 inches of the A horizon had no rmfs but the lower 3 inches did have rmfs as.Fe concentraWns., The subsoil was a 10YR 414 scl with 112f 10YR 5/6 amts. The east side of lot 8 might be used for part of the system for lot 9. Lots 19, 12,14.and-1 6 7W 14% . or- 44*A.. 6F. Soil conditions on the north side of the proposed subdivision were.also reviewed, although this area is not part of the interpretative determination for lots 1-9. T,he pits;evaluated all had greater.than A+4 conditions. Briefly, lot 10 had A+6",lot 12 had A+16',.lot 14 had A+.11",'and lot 16 had A+10 General The use of a common off lot (lot 1) area for installation of a common mound or separate mounds would be acceptable with county approval (for a common system). Other sites appear acceptable for long and narrow mounds with appropriate depths of sand fill. Final landscaping should be as.per the recommendations of the certified.soil tester so that surface and near surface groundwater water does not interfere with proper mound operation. Mound locations on Idts 8 and 9 need to be worked out carefully since the east part of lot 9 is not suitable for a mound. Soil application rates for those sites with A+0 conditions should be 0.2 gpdW2 and linear loading rates should be no more than 4.5 gpd/ft. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. owl Wy y;'1�1'as tabar'S ist Ljansky@ftnmerce.st8te.wi.us E-mail �Owner ` 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax CST ❑ wner O Other CO I uj N 1 { > W { ,•-1 X TLOT 1 ..,.,..«.. .YHPLAIM 9789 S.F. w ,• a 0.22 Ac. EAST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 - NW 1/4 S 009702' E 1309.93' A 472.05:_N 0031'58'W684.05'-A 86 146.00' —171.89' 229.00" ZZS,Op' — I_.N OOV2'9'W 625.89'-- N H orn : 15 A t0 3p$ { I. �' I �--N[10'17'02'W 31&24— 0 ui .i E+ m d 7 AD + I M < ^ lfl a �• I 150'{ — J Z { Z � s I i N 00'1702 W 318.62' w w N 0 Qo M is �\ t J cif °y p —— 0-17&1Y—— 225.00'— w 14N "M°i E+ M M \tea+ 4n� i i S 00'22'47'E 4 _i7' - - co X)O Q S K) M \ .< <'m / J N 00'2247'W 403.17' \ tr)0 a. 2o3 z�I CD co {{ 1 \ \ \ NQz { I ( agt�11V11 p 2 rj s \y LL MtL i .-i \ +� n <n { m EQms\N l U` OhN w 0!2 3 atlin o 3YB a 1� 150 3T I I p�p { ITri W po ° COI pNp r/ cile Ni�i n - l7 /n Oj — E mm moo It ,�_ "g N< $ a 00 n 8 z f1W ° --548.08'-- 3 A _ 878.52' 15&15'— 186.49'— *s --203.4-4 - 306.52' N 00'34'50"'W 1308.80' v��+ — 0 1306.52' 19� yi7��:li+T m n — — N 00'34 50 W 2613.047' R.A. (NORTH) WEST LINE OF THE NORHTWEST 1/4 UNPLATTED LANDS OOZ:t 'Ad 61:8U1 9002/[1113 '6MP"ao.--jVld IVNIPUYld IVNI!\PPOO\010-CLI\661-;001\:? x a M� U $ w�V7 0 \ an � v N VMC� �My�lRj` oL� U-�?? 3cnx CD 11 4 10 z lt! U.� g6 g' v n PC � My tl nj � I st / 11 d \ ID 6 o � � r C , \ Cn t' m co � pCp ZLm� I`am � R 3 \ I o = n \ o Z O � U f HIO W'!w Z'0 , 1 , F'LTE't CARTJRIDGE ..;AAOI�-at 11 . q'M M� hem ti►w Id-h OM Sara tl.r d�rWu a.p p,w�y a ,u w +•�arr� rvsw.t �. w�hd,► "I MWOMW %46,h ftw Ike as the blbn Nw Mme, YUa� at .�rrht falw 'i•�� by sy WWI 1. 1N6rr rhnWw f,,,clawwd rw.ry p gti11t1c tw�k is t. go"UTA guest w,r,a"»arras,to th• ' s. Puw*"way pa* w Nswr•to so�thlrw art'; um to 14mwo thr h.,�b„+u1 dr+d the s�OW r�kwot MMA"w**tstie ipibn Mwsw4to d d q e Q, ri a Wag wr' �. sbi*W � i�h by wtkh oal.r o* M°OWN"ir�1M Y(1► y. grysyMo t�.nM11�t11 so lb +MMmm*MW biet�Niw F'as r "�""�`N�witldiW laba dreiarlar rw-. burr s� ,'� •� '..� ,. J the Iraty UidhINr1io ,k ��IKUt�p111C� �uNAr INsNI �� .N �. , 1q.WpAKpy erid ftcWw"s W Gq f�nr bnk v . qr ir•.Ji1�,r• , Y . . .''""7a r w:X:niw •t,�,»I�s.r�trrt•i.0:ai�At.v ' M,A. �z)oa Jo -+-+ V-) N 89*28'25" E 1293-13' 684.34' 0 CA 5 rQ 70 LOT 10 F. 153636 S.F. 3.53 Ac. N 06*48'36" W 63.97' c W 184.26 c 351.44' 344.68' N 88*24'09" E 0 FL3 8�4.811 83 01 c 183.98'-- -0 LOT 11 -j I c 220.63' 102007 S.F. r"i rn 2.34 Ac. LO T 12� 72162 S.F. CD 71 Lo 1 .66 Ac. -- LOT 13 co 0 r) ':Y! 73290 S.F. I 0 66.00' f-D 60.83' co ---- 1 .68 Ac. �z C4 S 89*4 ST. CROIX COUNTY SEPTIC TANK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND . . OWNERSHIP CERTMICATION FORM Owner/Buyer Mailing.Address Property.Address"/��'—�d � cation require from Planning&Zoning _ g el?�e or newconstruetton.) City/State - _ Parcel:Identification Number LEGAL DESCRIPTION ----1•—�-----�--__. Property Location JCS %a, Sec. T �J7N R C //W, Town of Subdivision ,rte) -- ------ __ Lot# �� Certi#Ied Survey Map# �--.--- � ---- r-- ------ , Volume_ , Page# __-- Warranty Deed# ----— Volume � --� Pale# Spec house es no -�"-------. Lot lines identifiabl yes no SYSTEM•MAINTEN' CE AND OWNER CERTIF,CCATI4N Improper use and maintenance of your septic system could result in its premature failure to handle maintenance consists of pumping out the septic the System can affect the function of tank every Years or sooner,if needed,by a licensed wastes. Proper �'esponsibilities are specified in Ca the septic tank as a treatment stage in the waste disposal pumper . What yon put into § mm.83.52(1)and in Chapter.12-St.Croix county pose/system• Owner maintenance sanitary Ordinance. The property owner agrees to submit to St.Croix Coun P owner and by a master plumber,journe p ty lowing&Zoning Department a certification form, wastewater disposal system is in proper lumber restricted plumber or a Licensed pumper verifying signed by the less than 1/3 full of sludge, p operating condition and/or(2)after inspection and Ong that ar the on-site pumping(if necessary),the septic tank is Uwe,the undersigned have read the above requirements and agree to maintain the private sewage disposal system with the standards set forth ' >herein,as set by the Department of Certification stating that your septic system has been Commerce and the Department of Natural Resources,State of Wisconsin. nib Depar4nent within 30 clays of the three year tamed must be completed and returned to the St.Croix County planning expiration date. Ilwe certify that all statements on this form arc true to the best of my/our lmowledge. I/we acn/are the owner(s)of the property described above,by virtue fta w anty deed recorded in Register of Deeds Office. Number of bedrooms- IGNAT OF APPLICANT{S) / DA *'"*Any information that is misrepresented may result in the sanitary permit being revoked by the Planning&Zoning Department. *** .Include with this application a recorded warranty deed from the Register of Deeds Office and a copy of the certified survey ma if reference is made in the warranty deed, p (REV.08/05) 8 1 1 6 8 8 9 Tx:4093391 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 969930 BETH PABST REGISTER OF DEEDS ST. CROIX CO., WI 12/20/2012 2:56 PM This Deed, made between Central Bank. a Minnesota banking. EXEMPTS: NA corporation,successor-in-Interest to The RiverBank / REC FEE: 30.00 Grantor,and, Oevering Homes LLC a Wisconsin limited liability TRANS FEE: 126.00 company. Grantee, WITNESSETH,That the said Grantor, for PAGES: 1 valuable consideration conveys to Grantees the following described real estate in St.Croix County, State of Wisconsin: RETURN TO: cr•nT e,22��a0 S� PID#:018-2015-00-005:7�2os� 018-2017-10-000; 3�/ �qS 018-2017-14-000; 018-2017-15-000 Lot 5,Plat of Croix Hills in the Town of Hammond,St.Croix County,Wisconsin. Loth lq( 14 and 15,Plat of Croix Hills 1st Addition in the ToAm of Hammond,St.Croix County,Wisconsin. Seiler to convey the title by special warranty deed without covenants of the title or the equivalent for the state the property is located. Seller makes no representations or warranties,of any kind or nature whatsoever,whether expressed,implied, implied by law,or otherwise, concerning the condition of the title of the property. This is not homestead property. Dated this 30th day of November, 2012 Central Bank AUTHENTICATION (SEAL) Signature(s) By: Zach McBroom, its assistant vice president authenticated this day of (SEAL) TITLE: MEMBER STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN By: (If not, ACKNOWLEDGMENT authorized by s706.06, Wis. Stats.) STATE OF MN } }ss:. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY COUNTY OF Washington } Personally came before me this 30th day of LOBERG LAW OFFICE November,2012 the above named Central Bank Robert L.Lobera/1212485 ao by Zach McBroom:Its assistant vice president (Signatures may be authenticated or to me known to be the person s who executed the acknowledged. Both are not necessary)ap/ foregSxng instrument and acknowledge the same. I *(Jegby L Hund e NWY Cif ary Public shington_County, MN. My LAW—— FA . - Commission is permanent. (If not, state expiration pwft KOMI date: 1/3112017 ) it i 1 of 1 I -MEN ,. �� � lug 111111111 �. p o_IIII_ �Ii111�'�Itllll��` N �o illlllllll - � 1�1���� �illlllll ( 1111111111 � . 'III►IIII IIIIIiII `I � �����i�iiiiiii����_Ifliili - �jllllllll � fl16f111 rx- ..! IIIIIIIII � ` SO same N�� �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi� 4�11M l 1�������i1��►�����gIIIIIIIIIN ,s,��F �IIII a d 0 Ll CC IL ffi Z � JJ z a< I ----------- Yg ------------------------ �4� I S j•i I 1 --_-- 88 tt $$33 , i qq 11 �R E:� I 8 I I 8 I `1 clmNew MacltdTC xa I $ muv,oiu orxay.w I on an�tcx.maxn ¢¢ I I ^' e 1 1 I I k I I I id I 0 I I I I I ooaa c.cen,uuoov a, I I $ i F e I I I ---- _—_ ------------ I ( d I _ g I I I S s l I i r � I I I I --_---i i 1 ---- - --------- I 1 1 I 1 I ------- ---- -- T I I I 11 I I I I I I I 1 I I ii-------------_-------------J I --------------- ____—___a a3uxwi oTM,vn�w�a rtt 3xn acau 88 �b a� (n a _. p J E >LU w LLJ.1z i 32 0 Ol nil < i ax JJ � C I TO! lz � s maQN1 I I I rnM onw � wenw - it a -�-� Cl El ---- t I l i x I j a x5� I II 44 I 9 wxvuaxirnn i F6 q i i ��. b ♦Er � �a �I xMrv»aunvn x�� . v3MlTnMavnw'� �$Q 3 8 8 �° X Q I coi7i o N \ > a � fn� U ov a_n N=N't N N O L() M a C CUZ E mm �� o o E 4 II LLJ(n= Emof \ m� II \ > d c W U n Q c M U - I CY) I d _ j ONi m If / / cr / J (V rn r / I 6 J Ln m Cr) / J I rn I o \ I p o C: (Q�� E M, CN NmE V- 4O>7 \� N n C N J O E O Q' N 2 M O x mc c d rn n m O O > NN QO O O N G (6 m W p E> C w X \ M tl ° cr �; m Z L N f HIO Ol'iw Z'O rn — 6 v a� I � � COUNTY PLAT OF: KILLS CROIX o S.CRO��.�.,A IST ADDITION Rik 4 NW CORNER,SEC.35 LOCATED IN PART OF THE SW 1/4 04 THE NW 1/4 OF (FOUND BERNTSEN NAIL) SECTION 35,TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH,RANGE 17 WEST, TOVIN OF HAMMOND,ST,CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN; BEING OUTLOT 2 OF CROIX HILLS. m D Lgr 2 cw I w; VOL 20 PG 5137 M 1 NORTH LINE OF THE SW 114-NW 1/4 LOCATION MAP: N 89.28'25 E R.A.(S89%44-E) 3219 R.A.(32.22') N 89'26'25"E 1293.13' —.— (NOT TO SCALE) 1 _ _ z 684.34' 337 04'" ma 271.75'—-- — ———SECTION 35,T29N,A11W, 0 --———.. -- — — — ——— Otx.'A' 1 i ICO o; I •� �y'4' �r121 PLAT LOT 15 m I LOT 10 I HWE=IG75.9� T N,U LOCATION I 851C9 SF. OU' \5605� 53636 S.F. 1.95 Ac, \�9 3.53 Ac. ` L ° w I�IZ IuIN 61R N \ N 06'48'36"w 63.97' 0 66TH andEi M 'I I I _ -__.— - I ED 33 'D N 06'48'36'W sn.BS'._-- N LOT 9 111.92' .84.26' _ _ — I o U IZ sN M 344.66 — — _i 696.17 351,44' — o J 3b84Ac.F. • Z f 5 l ; .m I. NI�� 0 N 88'24'09"E C I !> Ip son AwEe Z D'llp�o N 882409"E �364.BI8a98'—-^: LET 11 m Ijp li BPP LBO-1077.90 v- 4 20087,_ -. I.zw I o ,[ C to M n a ] 220.63' ° 102007 S F. N.I M I" 11 164.18' _ ro � I Ila II --- - LOT 121 I" 2.34 AE LIN 6 zmll Ill l ^ '2162 S.F. ml h!I CD 14 I" o I DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOTE: FR i�tl a 66 Ac. l AD OM ER OR EWSDENT 904 W MYIANO 60 VULD :.I N I LOT ! o LOT 13 �, _. I ----— - ---— -�I MMMDE MR1 OR OHAUt RW WMMM OF 111E AMMWO _ . cWBOSME WATER NYAMACL AM SIL DOMON PUN FOR N 'Y 7329E S.F 66�� '� ® 3al.da' In PUT.M OHMS AT 6 ND UMTEO TO MMOK LM I 1 1I 71831 S.F. 1 � � '� A51rnWME,ALTERMG,FLLK OR DCAYAAO OR RON M 0 , IE? 1.68 Ac. n) z / 60.83_-- ---`-------------_ - ' II n j- m-x-sK FA¢Nmm ANY An E/31w11A HAIR MAMAM 97M WAD ' � 1.651 Ac. I M ouM WM� RIHWAIS,DETER DRWA15,Mau OR LW M MmFES S 89'42'58"W 468.67'I "9°M'"�• GENERAL NOTICE STATEMENT: I f s I I -'o� m w 66TH STREET + - FMNPAAMLSMNMIA6M8IMAO6SMW CImS1AM N i°• � 1� oMNIY,AM toW491W UK,MAFS AM MMAAnaa DL I I I CLMS M A,LOT SEE ASS M PAW7L Em)MEOM I'. qq RADM 09M M ANY P M OF D LOW. RL Si DDI DAN NK WK1 AM ME A6RaRMM in ow FOR FWD S 89'25'10"W J X11 Lor z L�a �eez2 w UTILITY EASEMENTS; �hti,/ TO CENTER T NO ME D MMED FAMES ARE m M MKEO xWr NAT R[ 60.100' I 1 ' �, rAj A ,( `Di tLot I EASEMENT MYMUTNIN AM MS"AW SMWY STAWL D MSRRWT 0001 Y /\ t AONG A,OUT UK D SAWLT LIE RL 06AAM OF SN SAL By MYN 6 A MAIM D SCMYF MR M9%MSI N 00'34'50"..w SF HIM UWIY EMENTS AS H MM 97 FIRM ARE Fa ffi USE D MME ANA.4 MrYAMmAwIC UWMD HAN A Maim I l ----1 --7.00-- SATE RE AMA I9 �g NOTES: D o S 89'1510 U FFWNT SE AD•X IMAM ONNMSE Holm) °.c 146.82' M• i I � IMAMMMFRMR-on J- -- --- LEGEND: IN MMAN•Ms MAN MMAD•D' ---- -ROADWAY SEIBACNS ® PROPOSED DAWWAY LOCADON Al PAW m M oZgKWD M PRON97Y NN DFAIAM EASINMIS 9AL HAW A AFEST 01K aMMW D"" SQT.L Q UTR!TY EASEYENI H YDL MEMODI MR LESS REM re MET ABOW ME 1FW WAiD it f ON .__----___.- NE MMx WADER ELEVATION OEYAT101 SANK jNk4�H32a 33 DRAINAGE EASEWENT USE E80 LOAEST BWIWGG OPENNG i1Y MOFSMND4i R.A. REtOROtD AS (FOX AS NOTED) FOUND T'go MPE W 1/4 CORNER,SEC.35 W 1.0 3/4'BY FB'IRON PM (FOUND 2 3/8'O.D.IRON PIPE) a 0 FOND 1 1/4'BY IB'NON PN I ol1/7 SET 3/4'BY le REM PM SGlE:1® 1 WT.I.SO . AT Ail OTHER TMR Lor caW4FRs 0 AO 80 160 AU MAAMGS ME ROM To CURVE DATA TABLE: A e UE A DE NW"' A59AIA m MAA S arN3G E MMMER I AAMUS(fit AAC MNaN(MI DELTA ANNE 100 UBWFR(FO I EMCW ORE CRON TANDY M I IAMFAAT OUT D il Moo I 2N.X NS4T6' 201.44 1 5 761655'W I S W47W N I S 67437 N DRAFTED BY: JUT APU 07 1 X7.4 1 IM42 X7678 IM89 5 76'OYM'w S 67452 A 5 MRSYp'W 1MYfl18EY ENGWOERMG SHEI I OF 2 i W ° z ; > o W v I Itnl I to Q UTLOT 1 0,, ,,,, UNPLATILD LANDS az I `QI I 9769 S.F. .�: ,� E SW 1 4 - NW 1 4 I alp EAST LINE OF TH -jI 0.22 Ac. °°°°"°"""'"' S 00'17'02" E 1309.93' / D� Z R 472.05__N 00'51'58" W 684A5'-� 66 0 146.00' —171.89' 229.00' 225.00' —,__ --N 00'02'29" W 625.89'-- e� U:N )r �to < INI cq I to Lo 00) 3 o IM J I � N o Q� nmua I W 31824'—�N 001702 I m v ( °oo a O w I m � 2O M M w a M m rn n a a o m I �x�o f0 a ow �� ( w In N Mme— I TT N a n � I M I � A;� 'x z z � 5a• � 150• — — — J Z z OL a �N 007 702` W 318.62'— �` a vi < 1 a I �� z h O I N p o M 1 1® \ w F" d N J o o 04 10 vl in w 6 o 'Q N Q �;.•" \ ` \ ;\ n m s --#-178.17'- 225.00'- f 3 w IOi) a o N N�w N -'°n M M \ sr��� �/ i�_�C4_ �9-is�-�-� �47" E 4 3.17' _ o x C! co L0, in \ ~ O Q}V M M \ `^c�.\ c+�`\ /i / - N 00'22'47" W 403.17 fro M O LI-ELI w 1 w ao0 os�\'n +� m /_��"°- — —203 9=———6-\-i 99.68=— �Z O z = I x C�2 4' O Z E- co co O NtTZ I I _I ZOpFWRjj„ \ 1 \\N \ N 1 < C0 LL: I b LL:A-i ce) (n V \ \ 1 Mao N Vl Un I m E"t Naf I B n 01 Q iC , OWN"ol w E-+� a_o 3 mM N m YI Ey M , ,v 1 1 50, a N m N o too i.� a N N m °o O I a o N m to DD 1 33133 6 6' I p F 2 z N O 3 1 ton of e 1 //o M n 3 I / 11 w b rI in N OI . N U U o ;4< rn o LO o "? Q o�z �i ao f Lino I I �V—_g— v°za r-� —No � / wr 1ri wa 41N� N O IO �� oK 0 to 444777 V-s ^¢ o h QO °o z w.40. N� ° --548.08'-- ri 3 In 3 Z 678.52' 80100' 1306.52' M N 00'34'50" W 1306.60' 1306.52' 190TH STAUT N 00'34150" W 2613.04 R.A. (NORTH) WEST LINE OF THE NORHTWEST 1/4 UNPLATTED LANDS 00Z4 •Wd 6t:et:l 9002/LL/B '6mp ad-1Vld lVNld\1Vld lVNlj\PPo O\0:0-£L1�661-�OOI�=` I Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION Page Of Division of Saf6ty and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85,Wis.Adm.Code Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8'/3 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include,but County St.Croix not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference point(BM),direction and percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location and distance to the nearest road. ` Parcel ID# APPLICANT INFORMATION-Please print all information Reviewed By: Date: Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes(Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)(m)). Property owner: Property location Troy French- French Homes Gov't lot: SW 1/4 NW 1/4 S35 T29 N, R17© Property owner's mailing address: Lot# Block# Subd.Name or CSM# P.O. Box 350 (fl NA Croix Hills City/State/Zip Code Phone number: city Village ow Nearest Road Roberts/WI/54023-0350 715-718-2929 Hammond 190th St. El New Construction Use ❑ Residential/Number of bedrooms 31.5 Addition to existing building:NA ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial-describe -NA Code Design Flow Rate:4,725 gallons/day Parent Material:Glacial Till-ground morraine General Comments and Recommendations:Soils are somewhat poorly drained Alfisols underlain by dense glacial till.This is an A+0 mound site.Redox features are the result of perching above and within the dense glacial till. Taxonomic classification:Aquic Glossoboralf SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT Boring# Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. GPD/FT'- BHP Eff#1 Eff#2 1 Ap 0-6 l0YR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 2vf 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap-d 6-11 IOYR 2/2 NA sil Impl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev(ft.) Bt 11-15 IOYR 4/4 mld 7.5YR 5/8 sic] Imsbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 92.32 Depth to 2C 15-40 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive limiting factor- in. 0 Remarks:Bt horizon-very dense Boring# Ap 0-7 l OYR 3/2 NA sil 2fgr mfr aw 2vf 0.6 0.8 BHP Ap-d 7-9 l OYR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sil Impl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 2 Btl 9-11 IOYR 4/4 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground Elev(ft.) Bt2 11 -13 IOYR 4/4 fl 7.5YR 5/8 sic] impl mfr cw lvf 0.4 0.6 97.80 2C 13-35 7.5YR 4/4 m2d 7.5YR 5/6 gr scl massive Depth to limiting factor- in' Remarks:Bt -small amount of clay CST Name:Eli M.Gottfried, Gottfried Environmental Signature: ` L Tel.No.715-833-1400 Address: 124-1/2 Graham Ave. Eau Claire,Wl.54701 Date: 31 May 2006; 15 June 2006 CST#221981 SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT i Property owner French,Troy Parcel ID# lot 1 Boring# Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. GPD/FTZ BHP3 Eff41 Eff#2 Ap 0-7 10YR 3/2 NA A 2mgr mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap-d 7-9 I OYR 3/2 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 A I Mpl mfr cw lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev(ft.) 95.80 Btl 9-12 7.5YR 4/4 fl 7.5YR 5/6 A Imsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 Depth to Bt2 12-18 7.5YR 4/4 m2d 7.5YR 5/6 sicl Imsbk mfr aw NA 0.2 0.3 limiting factor-in. 2C 18-38 7.5YR 4/4 C2d 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive 0 Remarks:Bt -clay bridging Boring# Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. GPD/1-V BHP 4 EM l Eff#2 Ap 0-7 10YR 3/2 NA A 2msbk mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap-d 7-11 IOYR 3/2 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 A Impl mfr as lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev(ft.) - 99.05 Btl 11-18 1 OYR 4/4 fld7.5YR5/6 A 2msbk mfr cw NA 0.6 0.8 Depth to 131:2 18-20 7.5YR 4/4 mld7.5YR 5/8 sicl Imsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 limiting factor-in. 2C 20-35 7.5YR 4/4 C2d 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive 0 Remarks:Bt horizon-Mn and clay bridging Boring# Ap 0-7 l OYR 3/2 NA A 2msbk mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 BHPS Ap-d 7-9 1 OYR 3/2 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 sil Impl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Btl 9-12 7.5YR 4/4 NA A 2msbk mfr gw lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev(ft.) 99.80 Bt2 12-17 7.5YR 4/4 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 sicl lmsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 Depth to 2C 17-28 7.5YR 4/6 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive limiting factor-in. 0 Remarks:This pit is located on lot 2;Btl horizon has clay bridging Boring# Ap 0-7 I OYR 2/2 NA A Imsbk mfr aw 2vf 0.4 0.6 Pit 6 Ap-d 7-12 IOYR 2/2 NA sil Impl mfr aw Ivf 0.4 0.6 Ground Bt 12-15 l OYR 4/4 m 1 d 7.5YR 5/8 sic] 1 msbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 Elev(ft.) 2C 15-25 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive 93.80 Depth to limiting factor-in. 0 Hand dug,shallow pit;Btl horizon has clay bridging M r Boring# Ap 0-7 I OYR 2/2 NA A 1 msbk mfr aw 2vf 0.4 0.6 Pit 7 Ap-d 7-12 1OYR 2/2 NA sil lmp] mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Bt 12-18 1OYR 4/4 mld 7.5YR 5/8 sic] lmsbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 Ground Elev(ft.) 2C 18-22 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr set massive 93.80 Depth to limiting factor-in. 0 hand boring w/5"auger and spade;Ap-d=plow pan Boring# Ap 0-8 l0YR 3/2 NA sit 2msbk mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 Pit 8 Ap-d 8-10 IOYR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sit lmpl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Btl 10-13 7.5YR 4/4 NA sit 2msbk mfr gw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Elev(11.) Bt2 13-17 7.5YR 4/4 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sicl Imsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 99.80 Depth to 2C 17-30 7.5YR 4/6 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 set massive limiting factor-in. 0 BHP 8 is located on lot 4;clay coats in Btl horizon;very dense in 2C I Visconsin SOIL EVALUATION R T #1804 Department of Commerce in accordance with Adm. ode Page 1 of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings FRIE 4 Steel's Soil Service,Inc. Attach complete site Ian on a l� ounty p p p I tha %.x 1 inc es in size. Plan us St. Croix include,but not limited to:verti nta far p nt(BM�, ct nnjn�-N5 percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arro in nd dist3 to nearest road. P rcel I.D. �j��—srvn�9W-- Please p IX CpUNT� T CRO R ewed _ Date Personal information you provide may tN used for secondary purposes riva0� aw,s.15.04 12 Property Owner Property Location French Homes, Inc. Govt.Lot na SW1/4, NW1/4,S35,T29N R17W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot 11��, Block# Subd.Name or CSM# P.O. Box 350 V na Croix Hills (� t° c2� City State Zip Code Phone Number ❑ City ❑Village ❑ Town Nearest Road Roberts I WI 1 54023 715-718-2929 Hammond I 190Th St ❑New Construction Use: ® Residential/Number of bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 600 GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Public or commercial-Describe: na Parent material Silty sediment and underlying reddish sandy loam till Flood plain elevation,if applicable na ft. General comments Mound Design,system elevation 101.85ft based on contour line elevation 100.1 Oft. No deviation from site and recommendations: area with out first contacting soil tester due to poor soil conditions F-11 Boring# ❑ ® Ground surface elev. 100.20 ft. Depth to limiting factor 19 ✓in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft' in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-10 10yr3/2 none Sit 2msbk mfr CS 1vf .6 .8 2 10-19 10yr4/4 none scl 2msbk mfr gw na .4 .6 3 19-48 10yr4/4 c2d 7.5yr5/6 scl 2msbk mfr na na .4 .6 ❑Boring# ❑ ® Ground surface elev. 100.20 ft. Depth to limiting factor 15 ✓ in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD1ft2 in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 A-~}" 1 0-9 10yr3/2 none 1 2msbk mfr Cs 1vf .6 .8 2 9-15 10yr4/4 none scl 2msbk mfr gw na .4 .6 3 15-27 10yr4/4 f2d 7.5yr5/6 SCI 2msbk mfr gw na .4 .6 4 27-48 10yr4/4 c2d 7.5yr5/6 sd om mfr na na .0 .0 *Effluent#1=BODS>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30<150 m *Effluent#2=BODS<_30 mg/L and TSS<_30 mg/L CST Name(Please Print) Sig re: CST Number David J.Steel 248956 Address Steel's Soil Service, Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 994 200th St.Baldwin,WI 54002 11/22/2005 715-760-0347 SBD-8330(W07/00) PrdpertyOwner French Homes,Inc. Parcel ID# Pending Page 2 of 3 a Boring# ❑ Ground surface elev. 98.20 ft. Depth to limiting factor 15 " in. ® Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 'Eff#2 �- 1 0-9 10yr3/2 none I 2msbk mfr cs ivf .6 .8 2 9-15 10yr4/4 none scl 2msbk mfr gw na .4 .6 3 15-28 10yr4/4 f1d 7.5yr5/6 scl 2msbk mfr gw na .4 .6 4 28-48 10yr4/4 c2d 7.5yr5/6 scl om mfr na na .0 .0 F-1 Boring# El Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. ❑ Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 "Eff#2 F—] Boring# ❑ Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. ❑ Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Ef1#1 *Eff#2 Effluent#1 =BODS>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30<_l 50 mg/L `Effluent#2=BODS<30 mg/L and TSS<_30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SB134330(R.07/00) Steel's Soil Service.Inc. STEEL'S SOIL SERVICE INC. 3 of 3 David J. Steel French Homes Inc. 994200 th St. CST-POWTSM SWl/4,NW1/4,S32,T29N,R17W Baldwin, WI 54002 Lic. #248956 Town of Hammond,St Croix Co. Direct 715-760-0347 Croix Hills Lot, 1 Fax 715-684-3449 This soil evaluation was conducted to satisfy a zoning requirement,it may or may not be suitable for your use. The location of this test may or may not be as shown,as permanent lot lines were not established at the time the soil test was conducted. Legend N 1"=40' ♦ =Benchmark Ele. 100.00 ft Top of 3/4"pvc pipe ��2 Z�6 • =Alt Benchmark Ele. 99.85 ft ❑ Top of 3/4"pvc pipe =Borings Boring Elevations B 1 = 100.20 ft B2= 1 00.20 ft B3= 98.20 ft B4= 0.00 ft � 1 r� �wn 616 �b �6 p� /3' D �k 0 EU�' r Parcel #: 018-2017-10-000 02/21/2008 11:32 AM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel#: 35.29.17.1131 018-TOWN OF HAMMOND Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type 10/27/2006 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner O- FRENCH HOMES INC FRENCH HOMES INC PO BOX 350 ROBERTS WI 54023 Districts: SC=School SP=Special Property Address(es): '=Primary Type Dist# Description ' 1918 66TH AVE SC 0231 BALDWIN-WOODVILLE AREA SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 3.530 Plat: 11-014-CROIX HILLS 1STADDN 018-06 LOTS 9/15 SEC 35 T29N R17W PT SW NW FKA OL 2 CROIX Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 010 HILLS NKA CROIX HILLS 1ST ADDN ('06)LOT 10 (3.530AC) Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4) 35-29N-17W SW NW Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc# Vol/Page Type 10/27/2006 837504 PLAT 01/17/2006 816514 WD 10/25/2004 777851 2681/415 WD 05/17/2002 679355 1893/347 WD more 2008 SUMMARY Bill#: Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 0 Valuations: Last Changed: 07/19/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 3.530 30,600 0 30,600 NO Totals for 2008: General Property 3.530 30,600 0 30,600 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2007: General Property 3.530 30,600 0 30,600 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch#: Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 I . 3 � 3Hi J0 3W 1S +11 M «05,-b .00 N er p/� n( (� k; „s !Y t � l I S 0-0— N— W - h — — '6Z r S,06 N n z ' '00,09C ,Z5'M o CN7•t I W j r O m a Ca fri ED W U4 W Z —� U) ,-. s.. n ,00'L M „8544i�.00 N Ln o Z ? (J1 Ul 0' 71 m 60 O rn cn � D N t'w N CP , �M.1, cp. N� N _-- - z z CO OD z n.(n c. 00 i 9� z -� CD © I ,00'051 CO L,4 04 LO DWI -TI 0 �_ M z h 00 o I �`°„ o Iv, �l N I - Q 00 i N ----- y / / Z � / bo 0 z po CI1 ao 00 L4 C4 INTERPRETIVE REPORT RECEIVED JUL 3 1 2006 Gottfried Environmental SAFETY& BUILDINGS 124 Graham Avenue Eau Claire, WI. 54701 r� 715-833-1400; 715-833-1381 fax 1275364 , for: Troy French French Homes Inc. P.O. Box 350 Roberts, WI. 54023 715-718-2929 Site: SW NW 35 29 17W Croix Hills subdivision Hammond, St Croix County a Safety and Buildings commerceml.gov 13 E SPRUCE STREET CHIPPEWA FALLS WI 54729 ■ ■ TDD#:(608)264-8777 'fs WWW.COMmerce-wi.gov/sb/ c o n s�'� www.wisconsin.gov Department of Commerce RECEIVED Jim Doyle,Governor Mary P.Burke,Secretary AUG 17 2006 August 03,2006 ST.CROIX COUNTY CUST ID No. 42258 Inspector ELI M GOTTFRIED GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL ZONING OFFICE 124 172 GRAHAM AVE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA PO BOX 1645 1101 CARMICHAEL RD EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-1645 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 08/03/2008 IdenttFieaton Nutbers, Transaction ID No. 1275364 SITE: Troy French-French Homes Site ID No. 713333 Town of Hammond, St Croix County T'lease refer'o both derlcatfon numbers; SW 1/4,NW 1/4,S35,T29N,R17W above;�n a12'caxres ondence with tI`e a eric :. Lots&,and 8 /Von,..) 1_61- / Subdivision: Croix Hills Subdivision FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1077636 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner,as defined in chapter 101.01(10),Wisconsin Statutes,is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design,not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. The following conditions apply to private onsite wastewater treatment system(POWTS) design and installation: GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s.Conan 85.60(2),Wis.Adm.Code,to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s.Comm 85.30(2)(b),Wis.Adm.Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is six inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of six inches of unsaturated,in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal so it application rate for the mound shall be<0.20 gpd/sf,and the linear loading rate:5 4.5 gpd/ft. Down slope toes will be designed using a>4:1 ratio rather than the traditional 3:1 to ensure more than adequate basal area is available. 4. Distribution cell orifice density shall be:5 6 sf/orifice. 5. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12-16 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum: 6. Special landscaping(drainage Swale)up slope of the mound and/or of the up slope toe of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 7. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. Locations of Proposed Mounds: ............................................................................................... 10 Lot1 ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Observations: ........................................................................................................................ 10 Lot1 Discussion: .................................................................................................................. 11 SoilStructure: ....................................................................................................................... 11 RedoximorphicFeatures:...................................................................................................... 11 HighGroundwater: ............................................................................................................... 11 Drainage:............................................................................................................................... 11 General Comments Relating to All Four Sites.......................................................................... 12 Drainageclass....................................................................................................................... 12 TopographicConsiderations................................................................................................. 12 LocalHydrology.................................................................................................................... 12 AquicMoisture Regime........................................................................................................ 13 Tillage ................................................................................................................................... 14 EXPLANATION FOR CURRENT SOIL CONDITIONS....................................................... 14 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SOIL TESTS......................................................................... 15 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................... 15 PROPOSALS............................................................................................................................ 16 3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate less than or equal to 4.5 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and/or occupancy that can beserviced on the site................................................................................................................... 16 4. The basal soil application rate must less than or equal to 0.3 gpsqft per day....................... 16 5. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C-33 sand must be used under the laterals............................... 16 6. Chisel plowing must be employed under the absorption area down to a depth of 12 inches 16 7. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches. ......................................................... 16 8. Slopes down-slope of the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3. This increases thetoe absorption area. ................................................................................................................. 16 9. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to divert water around the mounds,unless the mound is to located at—or near-the crest of the topographic high. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water from being trapped in the mounds. Alternatively, the mound can be constructed so that the"J" slope is wider in the a center of the mound so that water is diverted to either side.......................................................... 16 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................21 2 Table of Contents Tableof Contents........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................:.............3 RATIONAL FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT ................................................................. 3 GEOLOGICALHISTORY.........................................................................................................4 DESCRIPTIONOF THE SITE...................................................................................................5 Lots2, 6, 7, 8, 9...........................................................................................................................5 Locations of Proposed Mounds: ................................................................................................. 5 Lot2........................................................................................................................................ 5 Observations: .......................................................................................................................... 5 Lot2 Discussion: ....................................................................................................................6 SoilStructure: .........................................................................................................................6 RedoximorphicFeatures:........................................................................................................6 HighGroundwater: .................................................................................................................6 Drainage:.................................................................................................................................6 Lot6........................................................................................................................................ 7 Observations: ..........................................................................................................................7 Lot6 Discussion: ....................................................................................................................7 SoilStructure: .........................................................................................................................7 RedoximorphicFeatures:........................................................................................................7 HighGroundwater: .................................................................................................................7 Drainage:.................................................................................................................................7 Lot7........................................................................................................................................7 Observations: ..........................................................................................................................7 Lot7 Discussion: ....................................................................................................................8 SoilStructure: ......................................................................................................................... 8 RedoximorphicFeatures:........................................................................................................ 8 HighGroundwater: .................................................................................................................8 Drainage Lot8........................................................................................................................................9 Observations: ..........................................................................................................................9 Lot8 Discussion: ....................................................................................................................9 SoilStructure: .........................................................................................................................9 Redoximorphic Features:........................................................................................................9 HighGroundwater: .................................................................................................................9 Drainage:.................................................................................................................................9 Lot9........................................................................................................................................9 Observations: ..........................................................................................................................9 Lot9 Discussion: .................................................................................................................. 10 SoilStructure: ....................................................................................................................... 10 RedoximorphicFeatures:...................................................................................................... 10 HighGroundwater: ............................................................................................................... 10 Drainage:............................................................................................................................... 10 Lots1, 3, 4 (portion) ................................................................................................................. 10 1 1 � r and the redoximorphic soil features in most types of soils (Table 83.44-3, Department of .Commerce). Where this does not exist, an above ground SAS must be constructed (i.e. mound or At-Grade). The initial determination of this site has found the site to be unsuitable for mound type septic systems(Soil Absorption System), as per WAC Comm 85.30(2)(a) and(b). This code section mandates that: 1. Redoximorphic features be used as an indicator of seasonal saturation in the soils. 2. Redoximorphic features appearing at depths of within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon shall be interpreted as seasonal saturation occurring at ground surface ("Unless determined otherwise...,the highest elevation of seasonal soil saturation shall be the ground surface where redoximorphic features are present within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon.") Although Comm 85.30(2)(b)mandates that redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the A horizon be interpreted as seasonal saturation to ground surface, Comm 85.60(2)(a) allows for an interpretive determination of the soil conditions and depth to seasonal saturation should this condition exist. This section states in part: "A written report by a certified soil tester evaluating and interpreting redoximorphic soil features ... may be submitted to the department in lieu of high groundwater determination data. The written report shall conclusively demonstrate that the existing soil morphological features or color patterns are not indicative of current conditions of periodic soil saturation." This is the basis for the current report. GEOLOGICAL HISTORY The subsurface formation in St. Croix County consists of the Prairie Du Chien Group(dolomite and sandy dolomite). Depth to bedrock ranges from 0 - 15 meters(Brown,B.A. (1988)). This formation is of Ordovician origin(Paleozoic era 425 mya). Dolomite appears to have been laid during the early Ordovician period, while the sandstone was laid during the late part of the period (Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977)). Glaciation of St. Croix County occurred many times during the history of the earth, although the most recent glaciation, during the Pleistocene epoch(approximately 1 million to 10,000 years before present), is the most apparent. There were several stages of glacial advance,the most recent being the Wisconsinan stage. This was the result of the advance of the Superior Lobe and, from this, the Chippewa Lobe (Martin,L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin). St. Croix County appears to be part of the geographical province of the Western Upland. As noted by Paull et al (Paull, R.K., R.A. Paull (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA), "The Paleozoic rocks ... are the retreating erosional edges of marine sediments that once extended across the Northern Highland.... Late Cambrian seas washed over the Precambrian erosional surface to deposit more than 1,000 feet of sandstone, with minor amounts of interbedded dolomite." 4 GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL 124 Graham Ave.,Eau Claire,WI 54701; 715-833-1400 telephone: 715-833-1400; fax: 715-833-1381; email: eliestmnusbeglobal.net INTERPRETATIVE REPORT 14 March 2006; Revised 19 July 2006 based on the recommendations of Leroy Jansky, Wastewater Specialist for the State of Wisconsin Proper owner: French Homes Inc. Legal Description: SW NW 35 29 17W Hammond, St. Croix County INTRODUCTION From 1 December to 6 December 2005, soil evaluations were conducted by me on the property described above. The soil evaluations were done in response to a request by the soil tester, Mr. David Steel of Steel Soil Testing Services, in order to determine the suitability f the evaluated lots for the construction of on-site wastewater treatment systems. The sites in question all displayed redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the Ap horizon. This feature, according to Wisconsin Administrator Code, does not allow for the construction of a standard POWTS. Instead, it requires that it be determined that seasonal saturation does not extend into the Ap horizon. It is the intention of the property owner(s), French Homes Incorporated, to subdivide this 40 Acre (approximate)portion of land into 18 lots. Of the 18 lots, 5 have been reviewed as A+0 mound sites. RATIONAL FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT High and low chroma features in the soil as compared with matrix soil colors are considered as indicators of seasonal saturation in the State of Wisconsin. Department of Commerce Comm 81.01 (118) states: "High groundwater"means zones of soil saturation which include perched water tables, shallow regional groundwater tables or aquifers, or zones that are seasonally,periodically or permanently saturated. Comm 81.01 (119) further defines evidence of seasonal saturation in the soils: "High groundwater elevation"means the higher of either the elevation to which the soil is saturated when observed as a free water surface, or the elevation to which the soil has been seasonally or periodically saturated as indicated by the highest elevation of redoximorphic features in the soils. At least 36 inches of soil separation is required between the bottom of the soil absorption system 3 I were present in both the Ap and the Bt horizons. Soil colors in the Ap horizon were dark brown (IOYR 3/2). Soil density became apparent in the C horizon(glacial till parent material)at a depth of 21 inches (approximate). Redox features were faint in the bottom of the Ap horizon. This is designated as Ap-d in the soils report. Soils in this horizon (Ap-d) were platy in structure. E and Bt horizons displayed faint redox features. Redox features increased in intensity, size and frequency as depth increased. No redox features were observed in the root channels or in the worm channels of the Ap horizon. Soils remained moist throughout the profile. No saturation was observed. Lot 2 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon,there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light(1 OYR 3/2)colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 2. In the platy Ap-d and E horizons, faint redox features were present. Although platey,the grade was weak, indicating that water movement,would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. No redox features were observed in the upper portion of the Bt horizon. Structure in this area of the profile was moderate blocky. In the lower portion of the Bt horizon, redox features were observed. Structure here was weak. The C horizon was composed of massive sandy clay loam with distinct to prominent redox features. This horizon is geomorphically disconnected from the horizons above(lithologic discontinuity) and represents a glacial till parent material. The soils above are probably of loess origin. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint in the Ap-d and E horizons, absent in the upper portion of the Bt horizon, and present again in the lower portion of the Bt horizon and in the 2C horizon below. This suggests that there are 2 factors contributing to the presence of redoximorphic features. In the upper layer,the appearance of redox features may be a reflection of poor farming practices and poor soil stewardship. In the lower horizons,the redox features are a true indicator of seasonal saturation. Redox features in this lower horizon gradually increase in intensity and spatially. This suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS on lot 2. However, shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 92.40' (5 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed SAS). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. In addition, this area was not farmed, indicating poor drainage. This soil pit, located 142 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A+0 mound displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 4% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. 6 1 i , The St. Croix River has its origin in the Northern Highlands and its resistant Precambrian rock. The loess deposits in St. Croix County appear to be the result of the westerly winds carrying fine textured soils easterly to the eastern bluffs of the river and beyond. The soils observed on site suggest that the area has been influenced by glaciation. Soils appear to be loess (fine-textured,wind blown soil), underlain by glacial till. The glacial till present as parent material in the subsoil of the site is most likely the result of deposit from the Superior Lobe (Chippewa Lobe)material. Loess, present as soil of the Ap horizon, may be the result of the influence of the wind-blown fines of the St Croix River floodplain. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE The parcel of land under investigation lays in the SW'/4 of the NW '/4 of Section 35, 29N, R17W, Hammond Township, St. Croix County. All land lays east of 190`" Street, and south of County Road J. The proposed subdivision it is composed of an approximately 1400 feet long hill laying approximately East-West. The hill is composed of soils which are primarily silt loam underlain by sandy clay loam glacial till. The hill appears to be a terminal moraine. The evaluated sites are located on the north facing portion of the land area and extend west and slightly north, following the hill slope. Initially there were 5 sites to review. Several more sites, located on the west portion of the hill were added, evaluated and designated suitable for A+0 mounds (see plot plan). Lots 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 Locations of Proposed Mounds: Lot 2 - South portion of the proposed subdivision,bordering 190th Street Lot 6—North-central portion of lot, approximately 630 feet east of 190th Street Lot 7—North-central portion of lot, approximately 800 feet east of 190th Street Lot 8 —Central portion of lot, approximately 1000 feet east of 1901" Street Lot 9— South portion of lot, approximately 1200 feet east of 190th Street Lot 2 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam—Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Typic Glossoboralfs Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 4% south-southwest. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Soils in the Ap horizon had moderate structure and many fine roots. Few fine worm channels 5 1 1 " Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam—Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon(FoB)—Typic Glossoboralfs (old designation for this soil series) Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 5%north-northwest Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9 inches Depth to limiting factor: 6 inches Lot 7 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield to a depth of 6 inches. This suggests that,at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light(IOYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for the 3 pits observed on lot 7. Structure was weak in the platy Ap-d horizon from 6 to 9 inches. No E horizon was observed. The E horizon may have been eliminated as a result of plowing. No localized compaction(as a result of wheel traffic) was observed at the 0 to 6 inch depth. This may be a reflection of tillage. Evidence of compaction due to wheel traffic was evident in the platy Ap-d horizon. Density in the C horizon (parent material—glacial till)was observed, as was distinct to prominent redoximorphic features. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint to distinct in the Ap-d horizon, distinct in the Bt horizon, and prominent in the lower part of the Bt horizon and the massive 2C horizon. This suggests that there is a gradual increase in the amount of time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase as one descends down the profile. The presence of redox features in the Ap-d horizon and the continuous nature of the redox features descending down the profile suggest that seasonal saturation may be a factor on this site extending up to (and perhaps including) the Ap horizon. However, no redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. However, shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 93.80' (4.3 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed SAS cell). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. This soil pit, located 100 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A+0 mound, displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. 8 Lot 6 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam—Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon(FoB)—Typic Glossoboralfs (old designation for this soil series) Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 5%north. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 8 inches Depth to limiting factor: 6 inches Lot 6 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 2/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen for the 1"6 inches. The lack of redoximorphic features in the first 6 inches of the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. However,the lower part of the Ap horizon(designated Ap-d)was platy and displayed faint to distinct redox features. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 6 at 0—6 inches. Structure in the Ap-d and E horizons was weakly platey. Water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically in this horizon. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were distinct in the bottom of the A horizon as well as in the Bt horizon and increased in intensity and number the further down the profile. There was a small and discontinuous E horizon on the pits on lot 6. BHP's 1 and 3 lacked the E horizon. Absence of an E Horizon in BHP's 1 and 3 may have been due to plowing. The distinct, continuous redoximorphic features and the increase as one descends in the profile suggests that there is a seasonally high water table on this lot. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions may exist into the Ap horizon and within 6 inches of the surface during the , wetter times of the year. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. However, shallow very wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.10' (4.4 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed cell of the SAS). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. This soil pit, located 110 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A+0 mound displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area for a part of the year. Lot 7 Observations: 7 Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 7 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Lot 9 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 2/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that this may be a wet area and that drainage is poor. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 9. Only the Backhoe pit designated as BHP 1 displayed an E horizon. In the E horizon platey structure was observed, although the platyness was weak. This suggests that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. Neither BHP2 nor BHP 3 showed an E horizon. This is most likely due to the degree and depth of plowing. No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. Redoximorphie Features: Redoximorphic features were faint to distinct in the Ap and Bt horizon and increased in intensity and number the further down the profile. This suggests that there is a gradual increase in the amount time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. Redox features were observed in the worm channels and the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: Shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.50' on Lot 9. This pit was approximately 95 feet north of the 98.70 contour line. Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. Elevation, therefore,strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. Lots 1, 3, 4 (portion) A Locations of Proposed Mounds: Due to the unsuitability of lots 6, 7, 9 for mound systems, lot 1 and a portion of lot 3 and 4 has been designated for construction of mound systems. These mounds will service the residences to be located on lots 6, 7, 9. See accompanying plot plan. Lot 1 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam—Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Typic Glossoboralfs Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 4%to 4.5% north-northeast. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9-11 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Soils in the Ap horizon had moderate structure and many fine roots. Few fine worm channels 10 Lot 8 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam—Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon(FoB)—Typic Glossoboralfs Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 6%north-northeast. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 8 inches Depth to limiting factor: 8 inches Lot 8 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (IOYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 8. No E Horizon was present in BHP's 2, 3, and 4, probably as a result of deep plowing. In BHP 1 an E horizon was present. This horizon had a characteristic platey structure. The structure was weak, allowing for water movement. Overall, structure in the A horizon for all the pits appeared to be unaffected by plowing, displaying good structure and observable macropores. There was also evidence of biological activity—worm channels and extensive roots in the Ap horizon. Field traffic (farm machinery) did not appear to have compacted soils or destroyed structure in the area of the proposed mound. No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS, in spite of the tendency for fine-textured soils that have been plowed to puddle. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were distinct, although few, in the horizon immediately below the Ap horizon. Intensity and number of redox features increased lower in the soil profile in each of the pits, suggesting a gradual increase in the amount time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: Shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.50' on Lot 9. This pit was approximately 95 feet north of the 98.70 contour line. Here,vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. Elevation,therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 6% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. Lot 9 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam—Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB)—Typic Glossoboralfs (older designation— currently designated as Oxyaquic Glossoboralf). Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 5%north-northeast. 9 A drainage area. General Comments Relating to All Four Sites Drainage class: The soil survey manual notes that the drainage class for the soils on this site is "moderately well-drained." In agricultural terms,this is defined as"Soils that have periods of excessive wetness that adversely affect planting or harvesting operations or that reduce yields of some field crops." However, fields classified as moderately well drained are still capable of producing significant crop yields. This site has been used for corn production, indicating that the soils drain well enough for cultivation during a part of the year. No artificial drainage is used on this site. The areas established as mound sites all had grown corn in previous years. Non-agricultural definitions for drainage class deal with depth to high groundwater. The Soil Science Manual from the University of Minnesota(Burgess Publishing) defines moderately well drained as depth to high groundwater of greater than 3 feet. It further states"No mottles in the upper B horizon, gray mottles in lower B." All designated mound sites were free of gray redox features within 4 inches of the Ap horizon. No standing water was observed in the backhoe pits. The soils described in the areas of the proposed A+0 mounds are located in the highest or close to the highest points on the land on the north and northeast portion of the proposed subdivision. Therefore,they are elevated above a permanent water table. It should be noted that the drainage class designation is based on slopes as well as depth to groundwater and textural classes. Thus,it is possible to have a site located on a high point on the landscape, have poor texture and structure, but have a"well-drained"classification if slopes are steep enough. Topographic Considerations: All proposed mound sites are located on either convex or straight slopes. None of the 6 A+0 sites(lot 2,4 on lot 1, lot 8) are located on concave slopes or in waterways. Therefore,they are not located in areas where water can congregate. In addition, no sites are located in designated wetlands. Local Hydrology: As noted on the accompanying plot plans, the proposed dispersal sites have slopes ranging from 4%to 6%. Local waterways exists on the property, although not in the area of the proposed A+0 mounds. The Rush River flows north-south and lays approximately 1 mile east of the proposed subdivision. The Kinnickinnic River is approximately 2 miles west of the site and flows approximately east-west. Subsurface regional flow(groundwater flow) is most likely west towards the St. Croix River. On-site observations agree with the site description as noted in the NRCS publication, Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin (USDA publication) and the soil data reported on the web site http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov. Soils are classified as Typic Glossoboralfs in the Soil Survey published in 1972. However, the NRCS has redesignated these soils as Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs. Typic Glossoboralfs have a boric temperature regime with elluvial and illuvial horizons which are saturated at some time during the year(as evidenced by the redoximorphic 12 were present in both.the Ap and the Bt horizons. Soil colors in the Ap horizon were dark brown (IOYR 3/2). Soil density became apparent in the C horizon(glacial till parent material) at a depth of 18 inches (approximate). Redox features were faint in the bottom of the Ap horizon. This is designated as Ap-d in the soils report. Soils in this horizon(Ap-d)were platy in structure. Bt horizons displayed faint redox features. Redox features increased in intensity, size and frequency as depth increased. No redox features were observed in the root channels or in the worm channels of the Ap horizon. Soils remained moist throughout the profile. No saturation was observed. Lot 1 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light(IOYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 1 and proposed mounds associated with lot 1 (pits on lots 2, 3,4). In the platy Ap-d horizon, faint redox features were present. Although platey,the grade was weak, indicating that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. No redox features were observed in the upper portion of the Bt horizon in several pits. Structure in this area of the profile was moderate blocky. In the lower portion of the Bt horizon, redox features were observed. Structure here was weak. The C horizon was composed of massive sandy clay loam with distinct to prominent redox features. This horizon is geomorphically disconnected from the horizons above(lithologic discontinuity) and represents a glacial till parent material. The soils above are probably of loess origin. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint in the Ap-d horizon where present, absent in the upper portion of the Bt horizon, and present again in the lower portion of the Bt horizon and in the 2C horizon below. This suggests that there are 2 factors contributing to the presence of redoximorphic features. In the upper layer, the appearance of redox features may be a reflection of poor farming practices and poor soil stewardship. In the lower horizons,the redox features are a true indicator of seasonal saturation. Redox features in this lower horizon gradually increase in intensity and spatially. This suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. In profiles where structure remained moderate subangular blocky, redox features appeared gradually starting with faint features in the upper part of Bt horizon. This indicates that the Ap horizon is aerated and that anaerobic conditions begin gradually and increase as one descends down the soil profile. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS's on lot 1. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound systems is moderate. The 4% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the 11 f by the lack of reduced or oxidized areas in the channels. Tillage: Tillage can both aerate soil and cause anoxic conditions in the soil. In the short term, tillage will break up soil clumps, freeing trapped nutrients and exposing more of the soil to the air. This, in turn, will cause more breakdown of organic material. In the long run,tilling the soil will break soil peds and destroy soil structure, thus destroying macropores that will contribute to aeration and water infiltration. In addition,the physical action of moving a heavy piece of machinery across the land, especially in wet weather, will compact fine-textured soil. The soils on site appear not to have been negatively impacted by tilling. On all proposed parcels, the soils of the epipedon were moderate structured, subangular blocky, indicating that tillage had not adversely affect the structure. As noted in the soil reports and in the body of this report, subsoils were present which had platy structure. In some cases, the platyness was due to natural causes (resulting in an E horizon). In some cases,the plantness was found in the lower part of the A horizon(Ap-d), suggesting that this was the result of plowing(plowpan or plowsole). EXPLANATION FOR CURRENT SOIL CONDITIONS The proposed subdivision lays on a hill which lays in a general east-west direction. Slopes are approximately 5 to 8%throughout. Given the size, slope, aspects and underlying parent material, the subdivision appears to be part of a terminal moraine. During the many days that I have worked on this site,there has always been a moderate to strong wind from the southwest to the northeast. This is not unusual, since the majority of our weather pattern is the result of prevailing westerly winds with either moisture being carried from the south to the north (low pressure) or arctic winds (high pressure) coming from the northwest. These winds, as well as the relatively direct exposure of the south slope to the sun,may account for a more well developed soil profile on the south face of the moraine as opposed to the north face of the moraine. This, in turn, may account for more A horizon on the south slope relative to the north facing slope. Farm practices may also play a role in the soil development on this site. If a more southerly exposure has resulted in more soil development and an earlier warm-up of soil on the south facing slope, then these soils are less prone to "damage"from tillage at an earlier time in the spring than the soils on the north-facing slope. It is generally accepted that fine-textured soils are more prone to structural damage if plowed when wet or frozen. To prevent this, a different planting schedule would have to have been implemented on this site so that the south slope was plowed and seeded at least a week or 2 before the north face. Alternatively, the north facing slope should have been minimally tilled. These practices were not used on this site. As a result, soils on the north face are shallower with less structure than the soils on the south face. However, as the slope is directed more in a southerly or westerly direction, as in the case of lot 1, soils are more closely aligned with the soil forming factors and environmental conditions of the south facing slope. Thus lot 1 has soils which are more well-developed than lot 9. This being said, lot 1, as well as lot 8, display soil conditions that will require additional fill and 14 features). Oxyaquic Glossoborlafs have a similar profile to the Typic soils, but are darker in the Ap horizon and have an Aquic moisture regime. The profile is described as being slightly acidic, suggesting that the profile is aged. The aging may be due to a greater than average amount of water movement through the soil. Specifically, soils in this area are mapped Freeon(FnB). According to the St Croix County Soil Survey book, native vegetation for this area was primarily white pine, red oak, and hard maple. According to the National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region), (copyright 1998, Chanticleer Press Inc.,NY,NY), white pine grows in well-drained soils. Red Oak(also known as Scarlet Oak and Black Oak), grows in upland ridges and slopes. Maple grows in upland moist soils. All 3 types of trees therefore, appear to grow in well-drained or moderately well-drained soils. In relation to their tendency to grow in wetlands or histic soils, the 3 are classified as facultative plants (red, silver maple), or non-wetland plants (white pine). The publication notes that this soil type "consists of gently sloping and sloping, moderately well- drained soils." The publication goes on further to describe the lower part of the profile as becoming"saturated with water for long periods of time." Although not observed, significant redox features in the lower part of the subsoil indicate that this is a saturation does take place at some time during the year and that this condition persists for extended periods of time. Aquic Moisture Regime: "Keys to Soil Taxonomy"(6`"Edition, 1994)notes that"The Aquic moisture regime signifies a reducing regime in a soil that is virtually free of dissolved oxygen because it is saturated by groundwater or by water of the capillary fringe." The text continues, "It is not known how long a soil must be saturated to have an Aquic moisture regime, but the duration must be at a least a few days because it is implicit in the concept that dissolved oxygen is virtually absent. Because dissolved oxygen is removed ... by respiration of micro- organisms, roots, and soil fauna, it is also implicit in the concept that the soil temperature is above biologic zero ... for some time while the soil is saturated." In another portion of the publication, Keys to Soil Taxonomy defines aquic conditions as: "those [soils] which currently experience continuous or periodic saturation and reduction.... Saturation is characterized by zero or positive pressure in the soil-water and can generally be determined by observing free water in an unlined auger hole." In neither auger holes nor shallow hand-dug pits was standing water observed in the epipedon. In addition, soil colors in the epipedon were not those characteristic of organic soils (1 OYR 2/2). As noted previously, the placement of the A+0 mounds are on the highest or near the highest grounds on the site. Therefore, a high water table is not an issue on these sites. In addition,the mounds are sited on sloping sites, away from areas of water congregation. The presence of a capillary fringe, common where there is a large discrepancy between hydraulic conductivities between horizons (typically, coarse textured soil overlain by a much finer textured soil) is not found on these sites. Biological activity appears to be high as evidenced by the number of root channels and worm channels. Oxygen depletion appears not to be a phenomenon in the upper horizons as indicated 13 PROPOSALS This soil tester feels that mound systems on these sites would adequately provide effluent treatment and dispersal as long as the follows design conditions are implemented: 1. The construction of the soil absorption systems must be in the area designated on the plot plans. 2. Areas lower in the landscape must not be used for soil absorption systems. 3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate less than or equal to 4.5 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and/or occupancy that can be serviced on the site. 4. The basal soil application rate must less than or equal to 0.3 gpsqft per day 5. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C-33 sand must be used under the laterals 6. Chisel plowing must be employed under the absorption area down to a depth of 12 inches 7. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches. 8. Slopes down-slope of the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3. This increases the toe absorption area. 9. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to divert water around the mounds, unless the mound is to located at—or near-the crest of the topographic high. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water from being trapped in the mounds. Alternatively, the mound can be constructed so that the"J"slope is wider in the center of the mound so that water is diverted to either side. If you have any questions regarding this report,please feel free to contact me at the above address and/or telephone number. Sincerely, -& AM Eli M. Gottfried Registered Sanitarian(80806), CST (221981), Licensed Designer(13 10) 16 specialized geometry to accommodate the limitations in the soil. These sites have soils that have a compacted lower Ap horizon(Ap-d)which is weakly platey. This Ap-d horizon,unlike the soils further east, does not display distinct redoximorphic features. Some faint 7.5YR 5/6 redox features were observed, but these features were not continuous with redox features in the lower portion of the soil profile (horizons Btl and Bt2). The platiness may be related to the effects of farm machinery. Structure below the Ap-d horizon is moderate blocky with few redoximorphic features. As noted on the accompanying soil tests, it is proposed that lot 1 be used to support 4 mounds. These mounds will service lots 9, 7, 6, and 1. Lot 2 will have its own mound system, as will lot 8. It is not readily apparent why lot 8 has more well-developed soil than the soils found on lots on either side of it. Soils iri the area of lot 1 appear suitable for mound types of septic systems, albeit with A+0 soil horizons. As one moves east on the north portion of the slope, soils become less suitable to support mound systems. Soils on lots 6, 7,and 9 are unsuitable for any type of on-site septic system. Soils on lot 8 appear suitable for a mound system. All lots on the south slope of the proposed subdivision are suitable for mounds. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SOIL TESTS Where soil tests were done by me, Mr. David Steel and Mr. Leroy Jansky, differences may exist in the report of soil features. These differences may be related to the time of year when the tests were conducted(summer versus winter), time of day(morning versus afternoon), observer interpretation, angle of pit. In the case of the evaluations made by me versus Mr. Steel,the final evaluations made by me on this site were conducted in June. Soils were dry and free of frost. Lighting was good. Due to time constraints placed on Mr. Steel, many of his evaluations had to be conducted during the late fall when the angle of the sun was not ideal and the soils were cold. CONCLUSIONS A combination of cultural(i.e. farming practices)and environmental factors may have been at work in the creation of soil conditions found on this proposed subdivision. However the soils developed though, it is apparent that soils on lots 6, 7, and 9 are unsuitable for mound type of septic systems. No redoximorphic features were observed for at least 9 inches of the Ap horizon in any of the pits evaluated. The soils in this upper 9 inches appeared to be well aerated with the presence of roots and worm channels. Water movement therefore appears to take place in this upper layer. There does not appear to be a condition of ponding for any significant period of time in this upper layer. Redoximorphic concentrations appeared in the soils gradually, starting at approximately 9 inches (faint) and increasing in intensity (prominent) at lower depths. The faint redox concentrations may have been accompanied by redox depletions in the macropores although this was not observed. Slopes in all the proposed A+0 sites were gentle and either convex or straight. The A+0 mounds were not located on concave slopes. Water movement will be away from the mounds and will radiate outward. 15 LJF r N Lk f Attachment 2. Topographic map showing the approximate locations of the sites. Note that none of the sites lay in a waterway or in an area of converging slopes. In addition, no designated wetlands are evident on the map. 18 kk I if r Attachment 1 —Aerial map for the French Homes Inc development. Arrow points to approximate locations of mounds on lots 2, 6, 7, 8, 9. 17 r y . GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL Diversion Ditch– Sample — C — --- — ► B gradient to blend into -- — atural landscape S- ° o o- —--_o — -'o T W X Y B B B 5:1 slope all around ditch except stormwater outlet from ditch. Stormwater to be diverted around south end of mound soil absorption system. DIVERSION DITCH DETAIL II NOTE THAT THIS DIAGRAM REPRESENTS /20F THE DRAINAGE DITCH A= 1ft. B = 5ft. C = 80 ft. D = 1 ft. Grade Elevations: Trench Elevations: S = 104.90 ft. S= 103.06,A= 1.O ft, B= 13.75 ft, D= 1.84 ft. T= 104.90 ft. T= 103.23 ft. W= 104.90 ft. W= 103.40 ft. X= 104.90 ft. X= 103.56 ft. Y = 104.90 ft. Y = 103.73 ft. Z= 104.90 ft. Z= 103.90 ft., A = 1.Oft., B =5.0 ft, D= 1.0 ft. The bottom of the trench should be smoothed so that water flows evenly from the center to the end. Total drop from the center of the diversion ditch to the end is 10 inches. Drop is 1/8" per ft. 20 a r - French Homes—Sample mound plan view with linear loading rate of 4.5 for a 4 bedroom residence Dimensions and Footprints for gravel, sand, and fill -- + — fill — — — X ft. sand Ji Gravel Area W W ft. I _ Bed(Cell): Dimensions: 133 ft. x 4.5 ft. Sand: x= 8.82 ft. (based on 3:1 slope) w= 16.44 ft(based on 4:1 slope) u= 10.12 ft (based on 3:1 slope) Overall sand footprint= 170.23 ft x 29.26 ft Volume of sand: 623 cubic yards. THIS VOLUME IS FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES ONLY. Fill: J= 10.16 ft. I= 18.82 ft. V= 13.12 ft. Overall fill footprint= 166.88 ft. x 32.98 ft. Installer: Sand amount is an estimate only. Please check this figure and compare it to similar sites that you are familiar with. 19 i,ur�i�tly �rrrr..VrUt.It�V�YY SAFETY AND SUIT-DINGS MVISION' Integrated Services Bureau Ego& INSPECTION REPORT 13 Ea¢t Spruce street � � Chippewa Falls,VNI 54729 www.commerce-Wi.gov/sb Department of Commerce (715)726-2544 Date of Inspection: June 7, 2006 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: French NA Use: Residential Legal Description: SW, NW, 35, 29, 17W Site Number: 713333 Subdivision: Croix Hills '� le Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Hammond RECEtV Ii M. Gottfried, CST 42258 County: St. Croix O Box 1645 JUL 2 4,2006 ` au'C(are, WI 54702-1645 Plan Transaction Number: 12753 4 Sanitary Permit Number: NA ST.CROIXC06fter ame and Address: Goy French Wastewater Flow: 300-600 gpd PO Box 350 Persons Present: Owner, E. Gottfried, D. Roberts, WI 54023 Steel, R. Yarrington An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. Soil data verified is as follows: BHP-4 00-07" 10YR 3/2 sil 2csblmfr,_aw._ 7-11" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2msbk parting to pl, mfr, as, w/fl 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 11-19" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2msbk, mfr, cw, w/c3d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 19-24" 7.5YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk, mfr w/c3d 7.5YR 5/6 and 10YR 5/3 rmfs. BHP-1 00-05" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2msbk, mfr, aw. 05-09" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2csbk, mfr, as, w/f1 d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09-12" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2mpl, mfr, cw, w/c2f 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 12-16" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2msbk, mfr w/. c2f 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. BHP-1A 00-08" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2csbk, mfr, cw. 08-09" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2fpl, mfr, as, w/f1 d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09-13" 10YR 4/2 sil, 2mpl, mfr, cw, w/c2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 13-18" 10YR 4%3 sil, 2m-cpl, mfr, cw, w/f2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 18-24" 10YR 4/3 sil, 2msbk, mfr w/. f2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. BHP at intersection of Lots 1 2 and 3 A,.J �o*s 14113 13, /Z) /S Similar to BHP-4 c3d Fe conc in the lower A horizon. Five to six inches of A horizon w/o rmfs. Subsoil below the A horizon has has rmfs. REFERENCES 1. Brown,B.A. (1988) Bedrock Geology of Wisconsin , University of Wisconsin— Extension, Madison Wisconsin. 2. Keys to Soil Taxonomy(1994) 6th Edition. Soil Survey Staff,U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pocahontas Press,Inc. Blacksburg,Virginia. 3. Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin 4. Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 5. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region): (1998) Chanticleer Press Inc.,NY,NY 6. Soil survey of St Croix County(1978). United States Dept of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Research Division of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin. 7. Soil Survey Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture (1994)Keys to Soil Taxonomy Sixth Edition,United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Pocahontas Press Inc., Blacksburg, Virginia. 21 Page 2 of 2 June 7, 2006 Troy French site Lot 8 On lot 8 at a location approximately midpoint along the proposed system contour and 15 ft up slope conditions were noted to be acceptable to a depth of 15 inches (0-8" 10YR 3/3 sil, 8-15" 7.5YR 4/4 grscl with no rmfs). Lot 9 On lot 9, on the far west end of the proposed system contour the upper 7 inches of the A horizon had no rmfs but the lower 3 inches did have rmfs as Fe concentrations. The subsoil was a 10YR 4/4 scl with f2f 10YR 5/6 rmfs. The east side of lot 8 might be used for part of the system for lot 9. Lots 10, 12, 14, and 16 -�ad k4 a (o A, Soil conditions on the north side of the proposed subdivision were.also reviewed, although this area is not part of the interpretative determination for lots 1-9. The pits;evaluated all had greater.than A+4 conditions. Briefly, lot 10 had A+6", lot 12 had A+16",.lot 14 had A+ 11", and lot 16 had A+10°. General The use of a common off lot (lot 1) area for installation of a common mound or separate mounds would be acceptable with county approval (for a common system). Other sites appear acceptable for long and narrow mounds with appropriate depths of sand fill. Final landscaping should be as.per the recommendations of the certified.soil tester so that surface and near surface groundwater water does not interfere with proper mound operation. Mound locations on Idts 8 and 9 need to be worked out carefully since the east part of lot 9 is not suitable for a mound. Soil application rates for those sites with A+0 conditions should be 0.2 gpd/ft^2 and linear loading rates should be no more than 4.5 gpd/ft. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. -Way-G-. -sky,-VV ter-Spe�list cc: oust_ y ❑_PlumtSer Ljansky@ ommerce.state.wi:us E-mail jCRbST ❑ Owner 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax ❑ Other