The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About040-1151-95-000 (3) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN The Application of: DECISION Mary Delaney File No. 18-93 A hearing was held in the above referenced matter on May 27, 1993 before the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, Chairperson John Bradley and members, Bernard Kinney, Jerome Neuman, Robert Stephens, and George Menter. The applicant, Mary Delaney, whose address is 155 Glenmont Road, River Falls, WI 54022 requests a variance to section 17.36(5) (C) 1 of the St. Croix County Zoning ordinance for the following described parcel of land, which applicant owns located in Gov't Lot 3 , Section 26, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. The applicant proposes to add an addition onto the back of their house that would contain a stairway, thus giving access to their basement bathroom. The undue hardship applicant claims as a basis for the variance is: There is no internal access to the bathroom. Also, the residence is not insulated and there is no central heating. The foundation on the east side of the house is sinking, requiring structural repair. FINDINGS OF FACT Fite 1) The project is as described in t he p lans and the has been investigated by the Board of Adjustment. 2) The proposed construction would change the color of the house from white to shaker beige HC-45/MoorLife latex House Paint. 3) The Township of Troy supports the proposal as does the DNR. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Board of Adjustment has the authority to grant variances as per 17 .70 (C) 3) . (Special exceptions as per 17.70 (C) 4) . DECISION Based on the finding of fact and conclusions of law, the application of Mary Delaney for a variance is conditionally approved with the following conditions: a) Sanitary system is verified by a licensed soil tester/plumber to be code complying. b) Necessary building permits are obtained after sanitary issues have been addressed. c) The Zoning office be contacted for a compliancy check upon completion. NAME YES/NO Voting: John Bradley yes Bernard Kinney yes George Menter yes Robert Stephens yes Jerome Neuman yes This decision expires after one year from the date of the decision. If the proposal is not commenced within that time, a new application must be submitted and approved before proceeding with the proposal. If the proposal is not completed within that time, an extension of the decision must be obtained. This decision may be revoked by the Board, after notice and hearing, if any condition of the decision is violated. This decision may be appealed by any person aggrieved by the decision by filing with the St. Croix County Circuit Court an action for certiorari within 30 days of the date of filing this decision. Applicant assumes all risk of relying on this decision within the 30-day appeal period. John Bradley , Chairman Filed: DATE: July 22, 1993 w RECORDING SECRETARY Bradley opened discussion for the Zoning Office Administrative Secretary to take minutes in the future so that Nelson can direct his attention to presenting the material at hand without interruption. It was agreed that the Zoning Office Administrative Secretary will act as Recording Secretary, beginning in June, 1993 . NEW BUSINESS The hearing was called to order at 9:00 a.m. Nelson read the notice of the hearing as published: The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment had scheduled a public hearing for Thursday, May 27, 1993 at 9:00 a.m. at the St. Croix Highway Department, Hammond, Wisconsin to consider the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on site investigation was made of each site in question, after which the board contemplated adjournment into closed session for the purpose of deliberating on the appeals, pursuant to Sec. 19.85(1) (a) , Wisconsin Statutes, and reconvened into open session for the purpose of voting on the appeals. 1. ARTICLE: 17.36(5) (c)1 Bluffline setback 17.64(1) (d)2 Class D setback APPELLANT: Gary & Sandra Griswold LOCATION: Gov't Lot 2, Sec.13, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy 2. ARTICLE: 17.64(i) (b)2 Setback from state rd. APPELLANT: George & Helen Weavers LOCATION: Sh of the SWh of Sec.18, T29N-R16W, Town of Baldwin 3. ARTICLE: 17.70(3) (c)3 Temporary occupancy APPELLANT: Charles & Sonja McGill LOCATION: SEh of the NEh of Sec.6, T28N-R19W, Town of Troy 4. ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (d)2 Setback from town road APPELLANT: Dale & Janie Germain LOCATION: NWh of the NE4 of Sec.23, T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph 5. ARTICLE: 17.65(3) Off premise sign APPELLANT: Brian Mondor LOCATION: SE's of the SEa of Sec.32, T31N-R18W, Town of Star Prairie 6. ARTICLE: 17.70(3) (c)3 Temporary occupancy APPELLANT: Larry O'Connor LOCATION: NEh of the NW4 of Sec.28, T30N-R19W, Town of Star Prairie °PI-7c BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING May 29, 1993 (This meeting was recorded by a court reporter) The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 8: 30 a.m. Chairman Bradley explained the procedures of the hearing requesting that individuals wishing to testify sign their names and addresses on the sheet in the front of the room. Supervisors Stephens, Bradley, Kinney, Menter, and Neuman were all in attendance. Staff included Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator, and Greg Timmerman, Corporation Council on call. Stephens made a motion to approve the agenda, Menter seconded Motion carried. Menter made a motion to approve the minutes as corrected, seconded by Neuman—Motion carried. OLD BUSINESS ALAN BIGLOW Nelson stated that this was back before the Board of Adjustment so the County Highway Office could provide recommendations for the access widening being requested. Dan Federly, Highway Commissioner, provided a plan that recommended the driveway be cut back to the original dimensions. Stephens made a motion to adopt the dimensions as illustrated on the plan, giving the applicant 60 days to remove the fill deposited for the illegal widening. If the drive is not corrected, the County Highway Department has the authority to remove it. Seconded by Kinney—Motion carried. FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS Stephens suggested that the Board of Adjustment meet twice monthly during the "busy season" of construction activity. Discussion. Motion by Stephens, seconded by Kinney to hold Board of Adjustment hearings twice a month during July, August, and September. These are to be on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month—Motion carried. CHARLES & SONJA MCGILL Nelson stated that the McGills were requesting a temporary occupancy permit to live in a 32 foot travel trailer while their residence is being constructed. This is not a permitted use but rather a special exception use. Sonja stated that they would like to reside in the trailer while the house is being constructed. It is expected the house will be completed by mid-September. The Township of Troy supports a 6-month permit. DALE & JANIE GERMAIN Nelson stated that the Germains were requesting a setback variance from the centerline of a town road of 40 feet. The required setback is 133 feet, they are requesting 93 feet. Dale indicated they would like to build a 30 foot by 40 foot garage, totaling 1,200 square feet in a parking area that has already been cleared of trees. There is an existing two-car garage attached to the residence. The current house is over 133 foot setback and there is ample side yard to construct the garage. Germain has been using a neighbors shed to work on cars in the past. This building will soon be moved to' another location. The township of St. Joseph supports the proposed variance. Nelson reminded the Board of Adjustment that unnecessary hardship and public interest needed to be determined rather than convenience of the location. BRIAN HONDOR Nelson stated that Mondor is requesting an off premise sign. As per ordinance, signs are special exception uses. Mondor stated that he wishes to place the sign at the intersection of I'STH 64" and 100th Street. The directional sign is for his cabinet shop and would be 3 foot by 5 foot. Nelson stated that signs are allowed to be up to 32 feet2 . LARRY O'CONNOR Nelson stated that this is a request to live in a small residence on the property while building a second permanent residence. Temporary occupancy permits are special exceptions allowed for designated time periods. O'Connor indicated he would like to continue living in the small house while having the new house built. Once they have moved in, the small residence will be removed from the property. They would like a 6-month permit. 7. ARTICLE: 17.36(5) (C)l Bluffline setback APPELLANT: Mary Delaney LOCATION: Gov't Lot 3, Sec.26, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy 8. ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (d)l Setback from town road APPELLANT: Roger & Joan Williamson LOCATION: SWk of the SW4 of Sec.26, T28N-R17W, Town of Rush River 9. ARTICLE: 17. 31(2) Setback from highwater mark APPELLANT: John & Christine Siegfried LOCATION: SEh of the NEh of Sec.36, T30N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph GARY & SANDRA GRISWOLD Sandra Griswold presented her request for variances to the bluffline setback and road setback. The existing residence has no basement and the garage lacks storage space. They are requesting to build a storage shed 60 feet from the bluffline of the St. Croix river and 15 feet from the Town road right-of-way. The ordinance requires 100 foot setbacks for both of these dimensions. Nelson questioned if there was an unnecessary hardship and if it would be contrary to the public interest as outlined by the purpose of the ordinance. The Township of Troy does not support the requested variance since no hardship could be demonstrated. RONALD URHAMMER & KAREN MACKESEY Cancelled. GEORGE & HELEN WEAVERS Nelson stated that the Weavers are requesting variance of 75 feet from the centerline of "STH 63 ." The required setback is 150 feet. George stated that they are requesting the 75 foot setback for health reasons. Due to age and arthritic problems, they would like to add a 9 foot by 15 foot addition to the house. This addition would allow for a bathroom and bedroom on the first floor. The exiting house is only 59 feet from the. center of the road. The location of the addition would be 2 feet from the septic tank. Variances have already been received from the State on this matter. The Township of Baldwin supports this request. 1. GARY & SANDRA GRISWOLD Motion by Stephens, seconded by Bradley to deny the variance request for the garage setback. There is reasonable use of the property with residence and attached garage. No hardship could be demonstrated. Garage construction would also interfere with the septic system since it is located in the area proposed—Motion carried. 2. GEORGE & HELEN WEAVERS Motion by Bradley, seconded by Menter to approve the variance request. Health problems have been demonstrated as the hardship. The variance would allow the Weavers to continue residence on the property— Motion carried. 3. CHARLES & SONJA MCGILL Motion by Stephens, seconded by Kinney to deny the variance requested. No hardship could be demonstrated, there are other alternatives, and there currently exists reasonable use with an existing residence and attached two-car garage. Role call vote: Kinney, yes; Neuman yes; Bradley, yes; Menter, no; Stephens, , yes Motion carried 4 to 1. 4. BRIAN MONDOR Motion by Kinney, seconded by Neuman to approve the proposed off site sign as presented—Motion carried. 5. LARRY O'CONNOR Motion by Stephens, seconded by Bradley to approve the temporary occupancy for a 6-month period. Upon occupying the new residence, the "temporary structure" shall be removed from the property—Motion carried. 6. MARY DELANEY Motion by Stephens, seconded by Menter to conditionally approve the variance requested. Septic system code compliance must be verified and earth tone color change must be completed. Role call vote: Stephens, yes; Menter, yes; Bradley, no; Neuman, yes; Kinney, yes—Motion carried 4 to 1. 7. ROGER & JOAN WILLIAMSON Motion by Stephens, seconded by Neuman to approve the variance requested since this is the only location the garage can be located—Motion carried. I MARY DELANEY Nelson stated that this is a variance request to add onto the existing residence on the side away from the St. Croix River. The majority of the construction will be in the same foot print as the original house. If the variance is granted, the white color of the house would have to be changed to an earth tone color. Before any construction activities could take place, the septic system would have to be checked for .com lianc P Y John Delaney stated that they would like to do the remodeling so as to make it habitable during cold weather. This would include insulating, adding central heating and providing inside entrance to the basement where the current bathroom facilities are. The Township of Troy and Department of Natural Resources support the proposal. ROGER & JOAN WILLIAMSON Roger presented a request to build a 30 foot by 40 foot garage, 90 feet from the center of the road. The current residence on the property is only 75 foot setback. The county ordinance requires 133 feet from centerline. Since septic system and well location prohibit other locations, this is the only possible site. The Township of Rush River supports the request. JOHN & CHRISTINE SIEGFRIED Nelson stated that this was a variance request to be 67 feet setback from the ordinary high water mark of the Willow River. Other areas do exist where construction would meet the required 75 foot setback. This request should prove unnecessary hardship and that it will not be contrary to the public interest. John presented his materials stating that this is the best location for the addition. In 1982 , a variance was granted allowing a 696 square foot addition onto the existing 960 square foot home. This addition compliments that construction by providing additional necessary breakfast/dining, computer/den, and bathroom areas. At present there is only a bath and a half in the house. The Township of St. Joseph supports the proposal. DECISIONS Having completed the hearing testimony, the Board visited each site in question. Upon completion, the following decisions were rendered: 8. JOHN & CHRISTINE SIEGFRIED Motion by Bradley, seconded by Stephens to deny the requested variance. No hardship cold be demonstrated, there is reasonable use on the property with the existing residence, and there are other alternative locations for the addition that meet the ordinance requirements. Neuman abstained from voting due to a conflict of interest Motion carried 4 to 0. Complete findings of the facts and decisions can be seen in the office of St. Croix County Zoning. Respectfully submitted: George Menter, secretary TCN:mij Ii VARIANCE NOTE: Variances from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be applied for only where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the Ordinance will result in an "unnecessary hardship" which is defined, in turn, at Section of the Zoning Ordinance as meaning "an unusual or extreme decrease in the adaptability of the property to the uses permitted by the zoning district, which is caused by facts, such as rough terrain or good soil conditions, uniquely applicable to the particular piece of property as distinguished from those applicable to most or all property in the same zoning district" . If you believe that under the facts and circumstances unique to your property a variance could be granted to you, under the definition cited above, please set for both the type. of variance which you are requesting and the reasons that you have for making the request. Vwu 000 QWW a &'0 .�W). 14 U atsoo Jy) -%� hW4 Wwaln'44 6k�l M"-WM --W, Mor Mao 1 QVAsWio"elAisakRe co Mete by the Zoning offo-ice.MFOOA A Variance/Special Exception use permit is requested as authorized by Section OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES: THE APPLICANT, AS WITNESSED BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE HAS READ AND THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THE FOLLOWING: 1. Go to Township for approval and have Township send letter to the Zoning Office stating their position on your request. 2. Applicants must submit a site plan showing distances from property lines, roads, and/or water. 3 . Applicants are to submit a list of adjoining property owners including those directly across the road and their addresses. 2 ST. CROIX CO. ZONING OFFICE 911 4th St. Hudson, WI (715) 386-4680 APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION NO: _ FEE: $150.00 DATE A-4 APPLICANT OR AGENT: ADDRESS: 5!!S- rp I • ' �M 61HOME: 40 '7966 OWNER: 6 (Z ADDRESS: IS 6`e.(1 mo WcXJ( S LEG`iJIyDE-r' I " ' � SUBDIVISION: 4, Sec. , 1g:k_N, R21_W, Town of PARCEL NO: () CA 15 - ► l S� - qS VARIANCE A,--' SPECIAL EXCEPTION This property is currently used for and has been used continuously since / 7,3 SPECIAL EXCEPTION NOTE: Special exception use permits are granted in the discretion of the Board of Adjustment Committee. The are made available to validate uses which, while not approved within the zoning district in question, are deemed to be compatible with approved uses and/or not found to be hazardous , harmful', offensive or otherwise adverse to other uses, subject to review by the circumstances and the imposition of conditions, subject to the provisions of St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. If it is your belief that a special exception use permit should be granted to you for the above-described property, please set forth, in detail, the intended use of the property and your justification in applying for such a permit: 1 4 } M 4 . Applicants will be heard by the Board of Adjustment committee. After a public hearing on the application, at which. time testimony and arguments will be received, the Committee will adjourn to view the sites in question after which time they will reconvene to render decisions. However, the applicant should not consider the decision to be final until written notice of the decision has been presented to him. 5. At the public hearing the applicant may appear in person or through an agent or an attorney of his choice. The applicant/agent/attorney may present testimony and evidence and arguments in support of his application. 6. The fact that an application for a permit has been filed does not automatically mean that a permit is granted. If you are uncertain as to how to present your case you may want to consider the advise of legal counsel. 7. The fee assessed for this application is nonrefundable. 8. All site plans, pictures, and etc. become property of the Zoning Office and will remain in your file. 9. Statements of representatives of the Board of Adjustment made to you concerning matters of whether the Committee can, will, or will not grant the permits you seek are understood to constitute the opinions of those representatives. Staff are not empowered to act on behalf or instead of the Board of Adjustment Committee. 10. Applications must be returned to the Zoning Office by the end of the month prior to the month of the next regular meeting. Board of Adjustment meetings are held the fourth Thursday of every month. Any assistance in the filling out of this application will be provided you by a representative of the St. Croix County Zoning Office at your request. DATE• SIGNED• ` -vi Applica t/Agent OwndK 8/90 cj 3 TrMENT OF REPORT ON SOIL BORINGS AND SAFETY & BUILDINGS INDUS TRY DIVISION INL'US , LABOR AND PERCOLATION TESTS (115) MADISON WI 537907 HUMAN RELATIONS GoY� LoT 3 (H 3.09(1) & Chapter 145.045) LOCATION: E TION: OWNSHIP UNICIPALITY: OT NO.:BLK.NO.: SUBDIVISION NAME: �/ : 1/4 2� /Tze N/RZ6 E (or) TiPa� COUNTY: OWNER'S BUYER'S NAME: MAILIN ADDR SS. / S�c h97LJftjh4E V sZ�:71(C�S USE DATES OBSERVATIONS MADE NO.BEDRWS,: COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION: I PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS: PERCOLATION ETS: Residence ❑New Replace 19 0 UNL AY 1 bl �►t. ��CC< A&t: G7 ��ErS - t`�6 - Er-nePET RATING:S-Site suitable for system U-Site unsuitable for system 5 f.� - Swr7 k r STI❑� .�Q 1:EJY IN-GROUND S ASSURE: S fM-IN�u O�LDINGZNK:RECOMMENDED SYSTEM Mh(optional) ®® ®S U S U S U CoNVC�T)o�l RL i�tEl If Percolations Tests are NOT required DESIGN RATE: q I If any portion of the tested area is in the under s.H63.09(5)(b),indicate: !�5 Floodplain,indicate Floodplain elevation: NA A hEc-�—, PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS BORING TOTAL DEPTH TO GR UNDWATER-INCHES CHARACTER OF SOIL WITH THICKNESS,COLOR, TEXTURE, AND DEPTH NUMBER DEPTH 0; ELEVATION OBSERVED EST.HIGR_EST TO BEDROCK IF OBSERVED (SEE ABBRV.ON BACK.) B- I /o. 97.7Z t'�ary /b,33 4 ��5 76J LPN MS 44„$k�A 7 S B- Z 9.1-1 `>!4.R:C 0.1L' �•9 17 S�QL�S Sfl"$RN t�S 1'��A Pte,r S /�'' �'��ltilS CabCor. B- 3 D,17 92. /3 No.. lr > 10,1-7 6''$cS')5 s�'K gerq MS 6o'''eA&N s't\J B- B- B- C� PERCOLATION TESTS TEST DEPTH WATER IN HOLE I TEST TIME DROP IN WATER LEVEL-INCHES RATE MINUTES NUMBER AFTERSWELLING I INTERVAL-MIN. PERIQ0 t D 2 PERIOD 3 PER INCH P_ t `,�o oNL' 7Ao I ► 3 P- 3 .20 0--it 7.00 1 1 I P -- P- T 2 P . PLOT PLAN: Show locations of percolation tests, soil borings and the dimensions of suitable soil areas. Indicate scale or distances. Describe what are the hori- zontal and vertical elevation reference points and show their location on the plot plan. Show the surface elevation at all borings and the direction and percent of land slope. SYSTEM ELEVATION 4a •eo IIE�t� Rol-< IJAL'-'5 x'23, A' \#JELL P3 0 \ TN S<att- 75 0 mop C32A N(,c- E LF'f=/QQ,qs I,the undersigned,hereby certify that the soil tests reported on this form were made by me in accord with the procedures and methods specified in the Wisconsin Administrative Code,and that the data recorded and the location of the tests are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAME(print): TESTS WERE COMPLETED ON: M" �1 /9-6 ADDRESS: 1 / CERTIFICATION NUMBER: F NUMBER(optional): `7 S&coN e _r pSQN W S46 1� IPHON 3�d- 40 0 g$2� CST SI TURE: DISTRIBUTION: Ot iginal and one copy to Local Authnrity,Property Owner and Soil Tester. DI I.HR-SRfl4:395 (R.02189) -OVER - Page 1 of 1 Pam Quinn From: Pam Quinn Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 4:32 PM To: 'delan001 umn.edu' Subject: land use permit application Attachments: Land Use Permit Application.pdf; Land Use Addendum.pdf; Filling & Grading Supplemental Information Sheet.pdf; 111408vAdkinson Riverway LU Permit.doc Mr. Delaney, These are the forms needed for the application to fill and grade in the Riverway pursuant to Section 17.36.H.5 and 17.36.F.2.a.2) & may need to reference 17.36.F.2.9)which permits accessory structures. Once I look at your site plan again to refresh my memory regarding building locations, I can make sure we haven't missed any pertinent information. Call me to set up a time to meet here at the zoning office next week. I included an example Permit letter for your review that was completed last year. (Adkinson's house was too close to the bluffline to consider conforming) PameCa Quinn, Zoning SpeciaCist (PO1N'S) St. Croix County Planning & Zoning Dept. not CarmichaeCRoad Hudson, 'WIT 54016 715-386-4680 pamq @co.saint-crox.wi.us I i 8/3/2009 Parcel #: 040-1151-95-000 07/31/2009 04:47 PM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel#: 23.28.20.583E 040-TOWN OF TROY Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner MARY D DELANEY O- DELANEY, MARY D 901 DARTMOUTH AVE SE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55414-3103 Districts: SC=School SP=Special Property Address(es): "=Primary Type Dist# Description SC 4893 RIVER FALLS SP 0100 CHIP VALLEY VOTECH Legal Description: Acres: 0.707 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE SEC 23 T28N R20W PT GL 3 COM ON S LN AT Block/Condo Bldg: INT W R/W TN RD,TH N 11 DEG W ALG RD 83.5 FT,TH W TO LK, SLY ON LK TO S LN, Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4) TH E TO POB INCLUDES P639A 23-28N-20W Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc# Vol/Page Type 08/24/1999 609157 1451/265 QC 2009 SUMMARY Bill#: Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 0 Valuations: Last Changed: 07/21/2004 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 2.020 520,000 311,300 831,300 NO Totals for 2009: General Property 2.020 520,000 311,300 831,300 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2008: General Property 2.020 520,000 311,300 831,300 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch#: Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 l LOT 4 o� C.S._M. V_OL_.3, 582 A a� PAGE 610 o 582 -- ' 317.93' / I N Id Nw1 582 B _ CJ r LOT B 4008&; 4i 583 ..B 2 � � LOT A �}�� 575' C.S. M. VOL. I,PG. 260 - - --- - - - -.-- - - 7- 583 583 B l / 1 LOT 3 \ 347.39' - - - - coi; C.S.M. VOL.6,PG. 1574 583 B 583 A a, LOT 5 330' d d 58 3'C N 3 104.75' 1 � 0 583 D o 583 E z aq,'4,;�ij I Page 1 of 1 Pam Quinn From: Pam Quinn Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 8:20 AM To: 'delan001 @umn.edu' Subject: Additional information from archives Hi Dr. Delaney, I did some research and found 2 files in the archives for variance requests you and Mary made in 1991 and 1993. There are still copies of the site plan for the house addition that show the cabin/bunkhouse accessory structure you'd like to repair. This structure meets the 100' setback from the bluffline, being 120 feet from the closest point on the ravine next to the house and is >200 ft. to the shoreline (I don't know the exact OHWM level, but I bet it still meets that setback). Accessory structures (new construction) are permitted with a land use permit, so I don't see why remodeling work to reconstruct part of the building would be any different. I can use the 1991 site plan for our purposes, since it is an engineered drawing to scale. Any excavation work necessary for the project can be lumped into the permit, too. Before we get too far along, though, I will talk to my supervisor to make sure my interpretation regarding a conforming accessory structure is correct. Pame& Quinn, Zoning Specialist (PO`W7S) St. Croix County PCanning & Zoning Dept. not CarmichaeCRoad Hudson, 1W 54oi6 715-386-468o pamg@co.saint-croix.wi.us i 8/3/2009 Parcel #: 040-1166-80-000 07/31/2009 04:48 PM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel#: 26.28.20.639A 040-TOWN OF TROY Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): 0=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner O-DELANEY, MARY D MARY D DELANEY 901 DARTMOUTH AVE SE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55414-3103 I Districts: SC= School SP=Special Property Address(es): '=Primary Type Dist# Description SC 4893 RIVER FALLS SP 0100 CHIP VALLEY VOTECH Legal Description: Acres: 1.900 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE SEC 26 T28N R20W 1.9A IN GL 3 COM 108 Block/Condo Bldg: RDS W OF NE COR SEC 26, S ALG TN RD 11 RDS,W TO LK, NLY ALG LAKE TO N LN, TH E Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4) TO POB ASSESS WITH P583E 26-28N-20W Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc# Vol/Page Type 08/24/1999 609157 1451/265 QC 2009 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 0 040-1151-95-000 Valuations: Last Changed: 07/09/1987 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason Totals for 2009: General Property 0.000 0 0 0 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2008: General Property 0.000 0 0 0 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch#: Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 i 1 R 20 W o P �n1 639 A 1 1 6: W ��kba�v I 570 35`301 a� 15 7 � GOVERNM 639 D - - - -- - NT LOT- -- 1 \ o 02\ � 639 C \ n co O E m n d o m o v CD d CD ... m a - 3 00 m o ° O CD, C', O � a 3 df� 00 CD N .a N O O O � ' `G 1 0 O O O O � n Z3 Oj O -� N fin (D D) O W Cn o 0 o 0 Z m b w 3 ° ° o N CD 0 -� fD fG2 y 4 �i N cU m _ v -3 c IWO C> (D p o Ln ° CL O 'I co cD m 1 n co CD A A 7 y O c tv �+ O O O a � rytl�+l+I�i1 CD cr O �_ y SD m (D fD to - 0 O N C) N z -� o N Oy O D m !N 0 CD En N• A m c m CD 1+y c cn a 3 m CD CD 6 O _ p Z A N c O z 7 a o N W W O OD C. '.! Z 3 N °o ° oC W C N � (D W N II CD o Ay �aam a CD !. m v°a am a CD m m 0 CO o cQ No p o-`� w o D c ° N C2-0 y m 0 =' z fl o j N K O N CD N O N Vi 3 fn N co N Ny N D O O 7 flO 'O O p CD 0.0 'I W 0 DI N O ¢o O p M =y a O.a- CD �T7 n a b n O N co Cr CD it N� N W � w I .3 O O S 0 M ti - O C,� < y(Q n �, N O .0. b CL O O A x O J1 O 0 O ST. 0 F "' Y Planning&Land In or at�on Resource Management Community Development Department April 28, 2014 Mary Delaney 901 Dartmouth Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55414 RE: Removal of trees at 2155 Glenmont Road, Town of Troy Parcel #: 040-1151-95-000, Computer #: 23.28.20.583E Dear Ms. Delaney, Thank you for contacting this Department with your request to cut two trees on your property located in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay Zoning District. Today I met with you on your property to inspect the trees. After taking pictures and discussing the trees with Dahn Borh, WI DNR forester, I have determined that the trees are not healthy and pose a safety hazard to persons or structures. Therefore, they can be removed without a permit as stated in Section 17.36 (F)(1)(a)(3). You stated that you were planning on having St. Croix Tree Service remove the trees, which should eliminate the chance that any other trees will be damaged from their removal. Please note that this approval only applies to the two cottonwood trees that I identified with pink ribbon. No other trees or vegetation may be removed as part of this project. In addition, this Department is requesting that you replant at least two trees to replace the cottonwood nearest to your house. White pines would be preferred, as they can grow in shade, aren't too susceptible to Pine Beetle, and would screen your parking area and outbuilding from river. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (715) 386-4683 (8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. weekdays) or by email at daniel.sitzC�co.saint-croix.wi.us. Thank you for cooperation. Respectfully, Dan Sitz Land Use Technician Cc: Town of Troy Dahn Borh, WI DNR Forester Phone 715.386.4680 Government Center, 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, W154016 Fax 715.386.4686 www.sccwi.us/cd www.facebook.com/stcroixcountywi cdd @co.saint-croix.wi.us