Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
018-2017-15-000
Wisconsin Department of Commerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM County: St. Croix Safety and Building Division INSPECTION REPORT Sanitary Permit No: 572843 0 GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) State Plan ID No: Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Parcel Tax No: Oeverin Homes LLC, aka Oeverin Pro ertie Hammond, Town of 018-2017-15-000 CST BM Elev: Insp. BM Elev: BM Description: Section/Town/Range/Map No: , r 35.29.17.1136 TANK INFORMATION ELEVATION DATA TYPE MANUFACTURER CAPACITY STATION BS HI FS ELEV. raw b SepticL u Z~ y /don Benchmark A ? Q C~ • Q g P, I Alt. B- A- 7 9-Z- l D Dosing L-o~- 60f/ 3z / 13 ~ Ae~ Bldg. Sewer g Holding St/Ht Inlet / 8 ~4 S TANK SETBACK INFORMATION St/Ht Outlet TANK TO SP, (L WELL BLDG. en it Intake ROAD Dt Inlet ep Septic 3 Dt Bottom Dosing 3 S- ~Z Header/Man. T7 Aeration Dist. Pipe 2. 56 °J(. 9 Holding Bot. System Final Grade PUMP/SIPHON INFORMATION . Manufacturer Demand St Cover law GPM J Model Number 913 z- 93 . TDH Lift X SZ Friction L's System Head I TDH Z3 oe Forcemain ILengtbe. Dia.2 r Dist. to Well / SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM BED/TRENCH Width Length No. Of~T(ench PIT DIMENSIONS No. Of Pits Inside Dia. Liquid Dept DIMENSIONS r J /M SETBACK SYSTEM TO P/L BLDG WELL LAKE/STREAM LEACHING Manufacturer: INFORMATION ~ CHAMBER OR Ty/ ► / mj m: 20 A - UNIT Model Number: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Snj ;9_1 der/Manifold / / Distribution `z,1 41 9F x Hole Size x Hole Spacing r Ve~ Air Intake Hea Pipe(s) ,6 2-41 ' /{x Length Z~~ Dia 2 Length ~7~ Dia Spacing 5 V, 1 w SOIL COVER x Pressure Systems Only xx Mound Or At-Grade Systeilms Only Depth Over -~7 Depth Over xx Depth of xx Seeded/Sodded xx Mulched Bed/Trench Center ),-7 Bed/Trench Edges ` Topsoil I P es ❑ No Yes No COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies, persons present, etc.) Inspection, 1:1[_}/-c/ ~spection #2: Location: 667 190th Street Baldwin, WI 54002 (SW 1/4 NW 1/4 35 T29N R17W) Croix HHiil is Add Lot 15 Parcel No: 35.29.17.1136 R1 I 1"t- 60,1, 1.) Alt BM Description = d 06„ A, S -Tq 2.) Bldg sewer length = 3S'~ / - amount of cover = > 4z+ it Plan revision Required? 0 Yes No I Z I C~ ' ~(0 7 Use other side for additional information. Date Insepcto Signa a Cert. No. SBD-6710 (R.3/97) J PLOT PLAN PROJECT Oeverino Homes ADDRESS 1433 Cernohous Ave Suite A New Richmond Wi 54017 SW 1/4 NW 1/4S 35 /T 29 N/R 17 W TOWN Hammond COUNTY ST. CROIX SYSTEM ELEVATION 96.3' DATE 10/31/14 BEDROOM 3 CONVENTIONAL IN-GROUND PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK MOUND XXX SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1000 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE 630 HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE 1.0 ABSORPTION AREA 450 # of chambers none BENCHMARK V.R.- I ASSUME ELEVATION..W- ilter BEAR Filter ❑ BOREHOLE O WELL *H.R.P. Same as Benchmark Property Line 272' Scale - 1/4" - 10' 4d P_ All piping shall be SDR 30/34, within 10' of tank, piping shall be Schedule 40. 'g'el I is to meet al I WDNR setbacks Pro 3 Bedroom House 93' Property Li nes Area 15' below grade Huffcutt Combo Tank is to remain undisturbed BHP 1 B Tank is to be properly 4% Slope bedded and provided with lockdown covers with approved warning labels ❑ Pit 6 I B.M. 1 10' Diversion Ditch Pit 7 93.5 Property Line `C 190th St. 72' 94' I _ 200' Property Line i a0 I n n n x ~ o a. ~N~ co U LO C, " C4 \ M ~ X N to '0aa O +O M O M O N 16 U ~ O 0)O g?M \ (1 o_ z E Sm a~i~ O3: N gip pu) II LL JCo x EEL W \ tea,- m II I 1 ~ > n 3 c + U ` A ji > a N C*? M ~E N \ O _ v ~ ~ a \ ~ I vi y M11 N ` . / 'y y J fD II 04 C? N Ix Cl) 0) O / / 6 J J c - \I co V / II I ~ ~ V I cr I \ \ \ 0 i J I a m ~ 1 +n Z v di ' O \ 0 r o C~ N m j N N C L ptt (O CO l0 > y O N C 7 10 rna> c r o.N o Q~ m~ (Dt UHF c a2 m Q- 2 _ d nC j o N N c aMUN.L m-otE N .010 0) "O N Q' C Q -p O N \ O cc E -003 'D d m map m c~ ago \ m n I z° (D ca 0 mm m~ E °c a) d LO co ~ M o It IH ~ n z o - 4D i f HIO 011111 Z'O C15 Cn o 0 d i I ~ + oa I County z Safety and Buildings Division 201 W. Washington Ave., P.O. Box 7162 Sanitary Permit Number (to be filled in by Co.) /C ~ ~-7162 p O Permit Appli n State TrannsactionNumber In accordance with SP Wis. Adm. Code, submission of this form to the appropriate governmental unit ~ Y o ~ 0Q753&VJ is required prior to o sanitary permit. Note: Application forms for state-owned POWTS are submitted to Project Address (if different than mailing address) the Department of Saf d Professional Servies. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes in actor kh the Privacy Law, s. 15.041 m , Stats. L~ S L Application I ormation - Please Print All Information 6 7 Property Owner's Name Parcel # ~ 1' h 6g,vu'l A - " / 9 5 tgr?) Property Owner's Mailing Addres Property Location zqsz> C'd 1 circle onAr~ G2 r A 11 /1 0 Govt. Lot City, State Zip Code Phone Num er jlf(,V'/y Section r u 11. Type of Building (check all that apply) Lot # T N; Name EW 2 Fay Dwelling -Number of Bedrooms Subdivision Name IG,/r.;;t,c. f1jC,, Block# ❑ Pubiic/Cort mercial - Describe Use ❑ City of _ ❑ State Owned Describe Use CSM Number ❑ Village of of /Q III. Type of Permit: (Check only one box on line A. Complete line B if applicable) A. System ❑ Replacement System ❑ Treatment/Holding Tank Replacement Only ❑ Other Modification to Existing System (explain) B. ❑ Permit Renewal ❑ Permit Revision ❑ Change of Plumber ❑ Permit Transfer to New List Previous Permit Number and Date Issued Before Expiration Owner IV. Type of POWTS System/Component/Device: Check all that a I ❑ Non-Pressurized In-Ground ❑ Pressurized In-Ground ❑ At-Grade ❑ Mound 2:24 in. of suitable so and < 24 in. of suitable soil ~LW IdW ❑ Holding Tank ❑ Other Dispersal Component (explain) ❑ Pretreatment Device (explain) - r _ V. Dispersal/Treatment Area Information: f I L D7 Flow (gpd) Design Soil Applic 'on Rate(gp*0 Dispersal Area Rep ' ed (sf) Dispersal Area Pro (st) em ECev Ta % L VI. Tank Info Capacity in Total # of Manufacturer Gallons Gallons Units o , New Tanks Existing Tanks c,2. c U ~ w A ~ ro F_ 0 U m Lr wL 0. ~ Septic or Holding Tank + e!_ Dosing Chamber / VII. Responsibility Statement- the undersigned, ass responsibility for installation of the POWTS shown on the attached plans. Plum ame (Print) Plumb ignature MP/MPRS Number Business Phone Number ZW 7 /J / /T J_ fl Plumber' Address (Street, City, Sta Zip CX--: W 3 Z- , z ~ 1C ~ C, r S v VI ounty/De artment Use Only Pemtit Fee Date Issu d suing Agent gnat Approved ❑ Disapproved ~j~ t?a t t L ❑ Owner Given Reason for Denial $ 7 ZQ T' IICdsBpLovaUReasons for Disapproval 3Gy1 Q , _tem/~y~ 1. Septic tank, effluent filter and r/~►~.~i L~'~-'- ~ ~ ~VZOh dispersal cell must t& $eryiced /maintained as per management plan provided by plum • ber. Lr hA,/l oad.~~'~' 2. All setback requirements must be maintain per app ica e $ i~r ns for the system and submit to the C.udy only on paper not less than 8 in z 11 inches in size 1,614,L~r Oi-l 2- 5' SBD-6398 (R. 11/11) j 9,vARTUP DIVISION OF INDUSTRY SERVICES yti? Toy 10541 N RANCH ROAD HAYWARD WI 54843 S Contact Through Relay 3 P k www.dsps.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov A~O'ssloNAlS~ Scott Walker, Governor Dave Ross, Secretary November 04, 2014 CUST ID No. 226900 ATTN: POWTS Inspector SHAUN R BIRD ZONING OFFICE BIRD PLUMBING INC ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1432 120TH ST 1101 CARMICHAEL RD NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 11/04/2016 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 2476029 SITE: Site ID No. 807785 Oevering Homes Please refer to both identification numbers, 667 190TH St above, in all correspondence with the agency. Town of Hammond St Croix County SWIA, NW1/4, S35, T29N, R17W FOR: Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1511654 Maintenance required; 450 GPD Flow rate; System(s): Mound Component Manual - Ver. 2.0, SBD -10691-P (N.01/01, R. 10/12), Pressure Distribution Component Manual - Ver. 2.0, SBD-10706-P (N.01/01, R. 10/12); Effluent Filter The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with any component manual(s) referenced above. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per s.145.06, Coll ti l ► l (I stats. 711, The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: • A copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on SAFffy A with the Department. Changes to the approved plan must be submitted for review and approval. Failure to properly attach the approval and index page to plans that match the copy on file with the Department may resu in enforcement action under s. 145. 10, Stats. G0h1"1-=SP • This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the approved plans, and the "Mound Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems Version 2.0" SBD-10691-P (N.01101). • This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the approved plans and with the "Pressure Distribution Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Version 2.0" SBD-10706-P (N.01/01). • Prior to construction of the dispersal area, check the moisture content of the soil to a depth of 8 inches. Smearing and compacting of wet soil will result in reducing the infiltration capacity of the soil. Proper soil moisture content can be determined by rolling a soil sample between the hands. If it rolls into a 1/4- inch wire, the site is too wet to prepare. If it crumbles, site preparation can proceed. If the site is too wet to prepare, do not proceed until it dries. • The system was designed to meet the influent quality defined in SPS 383.44(2)(a) The quality of influent discharged into a POWTS treatment or dispersal component consisting in part of in situ soil shall be equal to or less than all of the following: SHAUN R$1RD Page 2 11/4/2014 1. A monthly average of 30 mg/L fats, oil and grease. 2. A monthly average of 220 mg/L BOD5. 3. A monthly average of 150 mg/L TSS. • SPS 383.54(3)(b) (b) The servicing frequency of an anaerobic treatment tank for a POWTS shall occur at least when the combined sludge and scum volume equals 1/3 of the tank volume. • The inspection, maintenance and servicing reports shall be submitted to the governmental unit within 30 calendar days from the date of inspection, maintenance and servicing. • The owner is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the private onsite wastewater treatment system (POWTS) in accordance with SPS 383 and the approved management plan • The owner of a POWTS shall be responsible for ensuring that access opening covers remain locked or secured except for inspection, evaluation, maintenance or servicing purposes. • Owners shall receive a copy of the appropriate operation and maintenance manual and/or owner's manual for the POWTS described in this approval. • Provide a copy of the approved POWTS plans and this letter to the owner. • Prohibit vehicle traffic and soil disturbance within 15 feet of the downslope edge of the mound pursuant to "Mound Component Manual Version 2.0" SBD-10691-P (N.01/01; R. 10/12). • Insulate 4" 0 conveyance pipe as necessary pursuant to SPS 382.30 (11)(c), W.A.C. A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. In granting this approval the Division of Industry Services reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter and the POWTS management plan to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 250.00 This Amount Will Be Invoiced. ` When You Receive That Invoice, Edwin A Taylor Please Include a Copy With Your Wastewater Specialist , Integrated Services Payment Submittal. (715)634-3484, Monday - Friday 8:00 am To 4:30 pm WiSMART code: 7633 edwin.taylor@wisconsin.gov r Cover Page Shaun Bird Bird Plumbing Inc. 1432 120th St. New Richmond Wi 54017 715-246-4516 Date: 10/ 31/14 Owner:Oevering Homes Location: SW 1 /4 NW1 /4 S35 T29 N, R1 7W 667 190th ST. Hammond Manuals Used: Mound Component Manual Version 2.0 (01/31) Pressure Distribution Manual Version 2.0 (01/31) Page# 1. Cover Page 2. Mound Plot Plan 3. Mound Cross Section 4. Pipe Cross Section/Pipe Layout 5. Pump Chamber Cross Section 6. Pump Curve r- 7-8. Maintance and Contigency plan zrrn~r~'~ 9-14. Soil test and State approval letter for intereptive determination ~o e G yes 15. Filter Specifications a ross section ND CE; Shaun Bird Signature License number 00 PLOT PLAN PROJECT Oeverina Homes ADDRESS 1433 Cernohous Ave Suite A New Richmond Wi 54017 SW 114 NW 1/4S 35 /T 29 N/R 17 W TOWN Hammond COUNTY ST. CROIX SYSTEM ELEVATION 96.3' 10/31/14 BEDROOM 3 DATE CONVENTIONAL IN-GROUND PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK MOUND XXX SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1000 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE 630 HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE 1.0 ABSORPTION AREA 450 # of chambers none BENCHMARK V.R.P. top of 3/4" pvc pipe = ~ Tl / ASSUME ELEVATION„b9 " ~ ilter BEAR Filter ❑ BOREHOLE O WELL *H.R.P. Same as Benchmark /a Property Line 272' ',Cale = 1 /4° _ 1 0' P'l All piping shall be SDR 30/34, within 10' of tank, piping shall be Schedule 40. Wel l is to meet al I WDNR setbacks Pro 3 Bedroom House R 93' Property Lines Area 15' below grade Huffcutt Combo Tank is to remain undisturbed BHP 1 B Tank is to be properly 4% Slope bedded and provided with lockdown corers with approved warning labels Pit 6 10:1 B.M. 110' Diversion Bitch Pit 7 93.8' 4d 10 Property Line 190th St. 72' 94 200' Property Line Mound System Cross Section.and Plan View - - i ~ Dimension Feet A J J B i i D «,5 . •1.1.M1. •YM1•Y1M11• •1.M1N• .1.4 •YY4.\YY1M1.1H•1•Y J l J.J1f1t1J1f`lM1l1l~'Y1l.ryflJ f}! J !1{.M1•J41.f1f1t }.J1r r h! hJ 1}J1J.hl f f+I•rM1J•!•J ! J J1r1h! J1f.f ,/yI •J4fhJ•J}J• }f•}}f+J.J.hf•hlifiJt•'}}.~ry.f r+JM1a••.f~.•K,f}'r}}11f}r}i}}1w'rv'}+'i}}YJ}hr•i}}}i1-, M1•J•f'r~••r}i ' r" A ' 1.1.4.1 :1 YJSj1:1fM1 4 1 Yr}f 1}J}J1f4J f.J1M} }},!}}1M4 S~L.141:1:tii{ 1 of t liyfy{M1fLi L •f•r.r•hJ rr ' ;.K•YM1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1•M1 M1 M1 M1 1.11 1.11 111 1 1•.~' 1H.1 YY1 1 f l1J}f1f}11J111J1J1J}!1 11 M111J}'}JYhl r J J}1J1J J1J1'1~/4rti}:T{1 l{t}}:!:}1r}l5l,t}}}I~f:}:J•.•.J !{f r 1 }J F ~i W i ~b 414 H '0 I i . J 1b'7- t K f <Z L fa R~ ` W K --7 - B 1 Z f-7 L Sloe 44 % - 1 = Topsoil = ASTM C-33 03 ~ = Clean aggregate = 4 in. sch. 40 pvc Cap Material sand fill '/2 to 2 '/2 in. dia. observation pipe Geotextile G H Fabric {}r.r r}} r, r.r.hJ. • . F i•1• v M1•1n• ' 3> P, t D E Ft Contour Plowed Surface d Slope Direction GENERAL INSTALLATION: The mound area is staked out along the design contour. Existing vegetation is mowed and raked off the site. The mound basal area (L x W) is plowed with a moldboard or chisel plow. Plowing may not proceed if the soil is wet enough at the plow depth to form a `/4 inch soil wire when a sample is rolled between the palms of the hands. ASTM C-33 quality sand is placed immediately after plowing. Sand is placed with a tracked machine keeping 12 or more inches of sand under the tracks or is placed overhead by a backhoe. Special care must be used when placing sand of less than one foot thickness to minimize compaction of the plowed surface. After the topsoil cap is placed, the entire mound is seeded and mulched to promote vegetative growth, limit erosion and protect from freezing. The observation pipes are slotted in the lower 6 inches and secured in place with rebar or a closet flange. 10/07lgj Page of L Pressure Lateral Layout Two Laterals - End Manifold 4 Threaded Cleanout Lateral Turn-up - Plug Manifold M X I I. Long Force Main f Sweep j, 90 Bend Distribution Network S ecifications Pressure System Construction tLateral Diameter' In. ifold Diameter In. Laterals are constructed of Schedule 40 PVC ce Diameter In. O-I X57' pipe. Orifices are drilled perpendicular to rifice Spacing) In. the pipe with a sharp drill bit and face down. L Lateral Length j Ft. Lateral turn-ups terminate with a threaded M (Manifold Length) Ft. cleanout plug and are enclosed in a 6-8 inch Force Main Diameter = In, diameter lawn sprinkler valve box accessible Force Main Length ___J e7a Ft. from finished grade. Grade Sys S~3a 6-8 lnch Lawn Sprinkler Valve Box Page of 03/05 lg; s i Septic-Dose Tank Cross Section And Pump, Performance Specifications Pump Manufacturer - t 7~ Tank Manufacturer Pump Model Number ~,.J Tank M~iel Number ? Alarm, Manufacturer v t C ' r -Total Tank Capacity ~ o Alarm Model Number D ✓ M Switch Type L Filter Manufacturer Total Dynamic Head (TDH)_ Feet Filter Model Numbm Elevation Head Distal greasure Network Loss • Minimum Pump Performance Required Force Main Loss GPM Ft TDH Total ' Outlet Manhole lvxin. 4" Above Grade With Manhole Min. 4" Above Grade Locking DcMce. Inlet Manhole With Locking Device < Below Gracie Sealed Watertight Securely Mounted Weir-proof Junction Box Win Finished Grade ♦ tr Vent Min. 12" Disconnect Above Grade Means With Vent Cap 1 . Outlet Filter Inlet Baffle ' A and. Reserve Capacity ' Switch S Weep Tank Volume = _y GPI B Hole ' t, Dimension : Inches Volume Gal. (reserve) A'' p Elevation C B 2 (alarm) Ft Bottom (dose) C ' D Elevation (dead) D 6 Total ,a: ,aY Y ♦ ,~i~ •t•::::i`• is:: i•:: ft::: :i<Tt: i : It,t,a t,.•<~ t {'a•t'{•: t•::f•a•sY: < t f ♦ 1 t ♦ • a ♦ t t { i t t t t f/ t t (i t tit < t t I t i 1 t t{ i{ a a t a•: t 1 t t in accordance with the STALLATION: The sepWdose teak is bedded and back f by the manufacturer may not GENERAL IN revel specific m depth of bury as specified. device (padlock) ' s product app ations. Maxim' locking manufacturer t fittings, be exceeded without prior approval. Manhole covers ematerd ~congmde n have to an the tank effetive with waterti~ 8's, and is sled . 4r sch. 40 p VC to bridge the tank instatled. Piping at the inlet and outlet is of a$pr oved ~ main laid on stable soil to prevent seating Electrical service complies with NEC ,300 and Comm tb.2:i. excavation and the sleeve. is seated watertight. . - - U2105 U Page of , y 0?A!. DYNAM'.C r,t"-.D/GApA~ TY PER MWUTE HEAD E'c:L;LNT AND vEYJATERING ~Y CURVE CAPA.L1' _ r---- - i ! 152 V, 0 D E L 53 I t _ wiw }-s t ~o T s li w w - I 50 _ 2~ 77 291 I I LVJ 231 C) 23, 12~ 40 I I 5 4.5 A3_ i ?01 152-~--~ 2 197 ~ 57 I I G_ c t 4' z 30 `L v L 17 8 - i ~C9 20 _ 44 D wr); 4 I 0 G SO 100 40 6 20 ,n"-ct/»-.. GALLONS 2-"--- - r - LITERS 5n b0 2~~ 32U - ----t.-' 518 v _ FLOW PER MINU?= - CONSULT FACTORY FOR SPECIAL APPLICATIONS C; 3 27,32 • Timed dosing panels available, ed with _ -1- Electdcal alternators, for duplex systems, are available and supp an alarm. Variable level control switches are available for controlling single phase systems. ' • Double piggyback variable level float switches are available for variable - - level long and short cycle controls.C 1 _ • Sealed Qwik-Box available for outdoor installations. See FM1420. • Over 130°F. (54°C.) special quotation required. 1521153 Series 1521153 MODE Cuntrol Selection 5 L S pu it s~ooo t Model Voltss- Made Arms 1 Simnp Auto le~c I N iex N15 Non .l 2 115 1 5 nclined I 2 or ~ _ 1L 9N1 52 115 1 Auto 43 1--; -_o E152 230 1 Non BE152 230 Auto 43 Indu:ed_ _2or3 SELECTION GUIDE 1 2 or 3 Non 10.5 1 N153 115 back variable level float BNt53 115 1 Auto 10.5 tncmled ~r_a 1. Single piggyback variable level float switch or double piggy 1 Non 5.3 1 _r I E153 230 E 53 230 Auto lI 5-3 inclided~~ 2 .,3 switch. Refer to FP10477. L6 1 2. See =M0712 for correct model of Electri cal Attemator E- a duplex 3i Variable level control switch el -0225 El used as a control activator, specify pC AUTION All installation of controls, protection devices and wiring should be done by a qualified 3. or `41 float system. 10 electrician. AD electrical and safety codes should be followed including the most (recent National Electric Code (NEC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSKk RESERVE POWERED DESIGN For unusual conditions a reserve safety factor is engineered into the design of every Zoeller pump. MAIL 70: P.G. 2O 16347 Manfacturersot.. Louisvif. KY 40256-0347 SHIP t0: 3649 Cane Run Road PUMP9 Ig , Louisville KY 40211-1961 ~ViII✓PY ® (5GZ) 778 2731.1(600) 928-PUMP =AX(502)774-3624 http//www•zoeiter.com s.r OC Copyright 2000 Zoeller Co. All rights reserved. 1 POWTS OWNER'S MANUAL, & MANAGENfENT,PLAN Page of FILE INFORMATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS Owner Septic Tank Capacity al ❑ NA Permit # Septic Tank Manufacturer ❑ NA DESIGN PARAMETERS Effluent Filter Manufacturer ❑ NA Number of Bedrooms ' ❑ NA Effluent Fitter Model ❑ NA Number of Commercial UnitsA Pump Tank Capacity ZkN U al ❑ Estimated flow (average) aVda Pump Tank Manufacturer ❑ NA Design flow (peak), (Estimated x 1.5) S`7 gaVday- Pump Manufacturer ❑ NA 0~3 Soil Application Rate ~ c7 aUd /fe Pump Model /V ❑ NA Influent(Effluent Quality Monthly average' Pretreatment Unit Fats, Oil & Grease (FOG) 530 mg/1 ❑ SarWGrgvel Fitter ❑ Peat Filter ❑ Mechanical Aeration ❑ Wetland Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) 5220 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 5150 m /L p Disinfection ❑ Other Manufacturer Pretreated Effluent Quality Monthly average'" Dispersal Cell(s) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODs) 530 mg/L ❑ In-ground (gravity) ❑ In-ground (pressurized) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 530 mg/L ❑ At-grade and Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 5104 cfu/100ml ❑ Driine ❑ Other. Maximum Effluent Particle Size Y Inch diameter Values typical for domestic (non-commercI4 wastewater and septic tank effluent. Values typical for pretreated wastewater. MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE Service Event Service Frequency Inspect condition of tank(s) At least once every ❑ month ear(s) (Maximum 3 yrs.) Pump out contents of tank(s) When combined sludge and scum equals one-third (Y,) of tank volume Inspect dispersal cell(s) At least once every ❑ months ear(s) (Maximum 3 yrs.) Clean effluent filter At least once every ❑ months ac(s) Inspect pump, pump controls & alarm At least once every a ❑ month ar(s) ❑ NA Flush lathrals and pressure test At least once every ❑ months ear(s) ❑ NA other. At least once every ❑ months ❑ year(s) ❑ NA ~r At least once every ❑ months ❑ year(s) ❑ NA MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS Inspections of tanks and dispersal cells shall be made by an Individual carrying one of the following licenses or certifications: Master Plumber, Master Plumber Restricted Sewer, POWTS Inspector, POWTS Maintainer, Septage Servicing Operator. Tank inspections must include a visual inspection of the tank(s) to identify any missing or broken hardware, identify any cracks or leaks, measure the volume of combined sludge and scum and to check for any back up or porlding of effluent on the ground surface. The dispersal cell(s) shall be visually inspected to check the effluent levels in the observation pipes and to check for any ponding of effluent on the ground surface. The ponding of effluent on the ground surface may indicate a failing condition and requires the immediate notification of the local regulatory authority. When the combined accumulation of sludge and scum in any tank equals one-third (Y,) or more of the tank volume, the entire contents of the tank shaft be removed by a Septage Servicing Operator and disposed of in accordance with ch. NR 113, Wisconsin Administrative Code. The servicing of effluent fitters, me nical or pressurized POWTS components, pretreattment components, and any certified POWTS Maintainer. other maintenance or monitoring at irlervals of 12 months or less shall be performed by a certt A service report shall regulatory authority within 10 days of completion of any service event. be provided to the local START UP AND OPERATION For new construction rior to use of the POWTS check treatment tank(s presence ) for the of painting products or other .p chemicals that may process and/or damage the dispersal cell(s). If high concentrations are the treatment Y impede tfi detected have the contents of the tank(s) removed by a septage servicing operator prior to use. Page of other chemicals thflt START UP AND OPERATION for the presence of painting products or For new construction, prior to use of to damagehthe dispemsslticefl(s)S} if high concentrations are detected have the contents of tho may impede the treatment process a tank(s) removed by a septage servicing operator prior to use. tewa System start up shall not occur when soil conditions are frozen at the Infiltrative surface. power During power outages pump tanks may lilt above normal highwater levels. When kup oh surface di _ result in the rest 9 0t ewill ~e and may O razor prior to restoring p discharged to the dispersal cell(s) in one large dose, overloading the cell(s) the p mp controls to restore normal levels To avoid this si have Plmcontents oOoWTS Maintainer to assist inymanuap y tage ooperatingcin effluent pump or r contact ct, the area within within the pump tank. Do not drive or park vehicles over tanks and dispersal cells, not drive or park over, or otherwise disturb or cOm 15 feet down slope of any mound or gtand soil area. the performance, and prolong the life of the POWI Reduction or elimination of the following from the wastewater stream may improve p antibiotics; baby wipes; cigarette butts; condoms; cotton swabs; degreasers; dental floss; diapers; disinfectants; fat; foundation drain gasoline-, grease; herbicides; meat scraps; medications; oil; painting products; (sump pump) water; fruit and vegetable peelings; pesticides; sanitary napkins; tampons; and water softener brine. st s stain be taken to insure that the system is propel y ABANDONMENT 33 i e theo following step When the POWTS fails and/or is permanently taken out oservice and safety abandoned in compliance with chapter Comm • Ail piping to tanks and pits shall be disconnected and the abandoned pipe openings sealed. • The contents of all tanks and pits shall be removed and property disposed of by a Septage Servicing Operator. • After pumping, all tanks and pits shall be excavated and removed or their covers removed and the void space fiNed with sgiil, gravel or another inert solid material. CONTINGENCY PLAN If the POWTS falls and cannot be repaired the following measures have been, or must be taken, to provide a code comp lion m replacement system: replacement ❑ A suitable replacement area has been fcited fro disturbance utilized mpaction anid should not be infra ged uspon b by re qwirled The replacement area should be pr with the ruler{ in setbacks from existing and proposed structure, lot lines and wells. Failure to protect the replacement area will result in the nE{e for a new soil and site evaluation to establish a suitable replacement area. Replacementsystems must comply effect at that time. 13 A sultable replacement area is not vailaabe due to setback soil Barring advances in POWTS tech ogW a holding tank may be installed as a last resort to replace POWTS a soil and site The site has not been evaluated l ereplaacement arePt I~f~ replacement area.Upon aarea'isuavailable ao ld ng tank may be InstalledNas ~"iriiast be performed to locate a suitable p a last resort to replace the failed POWTS. Mound and at-grade soil absorption systems maynbe reconstructed i{n pellace foat that llowi t removal of the biomat at the infiltrative surface. Reconstructions of such systems must comply with the rules <<WARNING>> INSUFFICIENT SEPTIC, PUMP C AND , POTHER TREATMENT TANKS TANK UNDER ANY C RCUMSTANCES.' DEATH MAY RESULT. R SCUE O~ A ENTER A SEPTIC, PUMP OR OTHER TREATMENT PERSON FROM THE INTERIOR OF A TANK MAY BE DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE. - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS POWTS INSTALLER POWTS MAI NTAINER Name Name j Phone Phone LOCAL REGULATORY AUTHORITY SEPTAGE SERVICING OPERATOR UMPER Name, /AJr Name _ / r ~ Phone Phone ~ ! ~ "cam Z C~"° This document was drafted in compliance with chapter SPS 383.22(2)(b)(1)(d)&(f) and 383.54(1), (2) & (3), Wisconsin Administrative Code. FILTER CARTRIDGE INSTRUCTIONS i V 2008-' Installation STEP 1 Dry fit the filter case onto the end of the outlet pipe to ensure it is centered under the access opening. If not, then either insert more pipe into the tank through the outlet or solvent weld (glue) additional pipe onto the outlet pipe. STEP 2 While the case is still dry fitted on the outlet pipe, measure the length of 3/4-inch pipe needed to brace the filter to the tank end wall if utilizing the optional supplemental side support. If side support method is not utilized, proceed to step four. STEP For installations utilizing to the optional the filter case supplemental If de support method, is not solvent t weld the -!<-inch pipe on utilized, proceed to step four. STEP 4 Solvent weld the filter case onto the outlet pipe. Insert the filter; cartridge into the case, pressing down until the filter locks into the bottom of the case. STEP 5 If a VRS switch is utilized: insert into the filter and lock by turning clockwise 900. Maintenance 1. The effluent filter should be cleaned every time the septic tank is x# serviced. 2. Open the outlet access opening to inspect the tank and filter. 3. Pump the septic tank completely, making sure to remove the sludge layer on the bottom of the tank and not just the scum and effluent. _ 4. Once the effluent level has been lowered below the invert of the outlet pipe, firmly pull up on the filter handle to dislodge the cartridge from the case. 5. Slide the cartridge up and out of the case for cleaning. 6. If a VRS switch connected to an alarm is present, the switch should be removed by turning counterclockwise 900 and cleaned with water only. 7. While holding the cartridge on its side (large flat surface facing down) over the access opening, rinse off the cartridge with water only, making sure all septage material is rinsed back into the tank. 8. If VRS switch is utilized, replace by inserting into filter and turning clockwise 901, 9. Insert the filter cartridge back into the case, pressing down until ,fir's the filter locks into the bottom of the case. ° 10. Replace and secure the access opening on the tank. BEAR ONSITET" FILTER CARTRIDGE - FIVE-YEAR LIMITED WARRANTY ~a'.e Bear On=lie filter ca•tri0gc ar_ v2-rZmrt tl to oe e -e o' ue-e , In ,rya... a..: aDr✓r"H^ST for fi:? rn~~sume.. purchase. BEAR ONSITETM Filter Case -lifetime Limited Warranty -,nS.Ce ,h ns -!',e fl _a~e I ~,."ee nr ~ e':6; a K 5 -a the or;!i Rial put'.`s.':Ser owr;5 tnc 1 4 !oc rep"ace ,en ar, o t e is not oiere. I} a❑ U ace aG r r v; h ms i ware o i. al'J-: r or of S 1 4 e - - ar ,e n r 3 0 {a .;1 e vit, all Vo.t Cie hr`d 1^. ~ o ..E i7 d. le r .^.n5 1-F .5 'lOC r~S GC..._~.w !Or ldu'J.' •n2r ' fuQC .!;3! Or Ctinse.. ~ { . lr+!'D event 51'all v1 1'aL(lh O' Ptar tim DurchPSe p n Le G. the pr.iCtu_31 ; i`-~, ST. CROIX COUNTY SEPTIC TANK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION FORM Owner/Buyera~P-_ Mailing Address Property Address _J_' (Verification required from Planning & Zoning Department br f w c oon.) City/State (dw i yt W-T Parcel Identification Number ons LEGAL DESCRIPTION Property Locatiol> Lt> % PL J Va , Sec-; J T ~ C'N R-./ ? -W, Town oi' Subdivision &cg/*-V- Lot # Certified Survey Map # Q Volume page Warranty Deed # 36) ,v, - oltune Page # Spec house yes o Lot lines identirabl yes no SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND OWNER CERTHICATION Improper use and maintenance of your septic system could result in its premature failure to handle wastes. Proper maintenance consists of pumping out the septic tank every three years or sooner, if needed, by a licensed pumper. What you put into the system can affect the fitnction of the septic tank as a treatment stage in the waste disposal system. Owner maintenance responsibilities are specified in §Comm, 83.52(1) and in Chapter 12 - St. Croix County Sanitary Ordinance. The property owner agrees n submit to St. Croix owner and a master plumber County Planning & Zoning Department a certification form, signed by the wastewater disposal system is i , journeyman pl umber, restricted plumber or a licensed pumper verifying that (1) the on-site less than 313 full of sludge. n proper operating condition and/or (2) after inspection and pumping (if necessary), the septic tank is I/we, the undersigned have read the above requirements and agree to maintain the private sewage disposal system with the standards set forth, herein, as set by the Department of Commerce and the Department of Natural Resources, State of Wisconsin, Certification stating that your septic system has been maintained must be completed and returned to the St. Croi7c County Planning & Zoning Department within 30 days of the three year expiration date, l/we certify that all statements orr this form are true to the best ofmy/our knowledge. I/we am/are the owner(s) of the property described above, by virtue of a warranty deed recorded in Register of Deeds Office. Number of bedrooms I L I APPLICANTS / --f / - DAT. ***Any information that is misrepresented may result in the sanitary permit being revoked by the Planning & Zoning Department Include with this application a recorded warranty deed from the Register of Deeds Office and a copy of the certified survey map if- reference is made in the warranty deed, (REV. 08/05) 8 1 1 6 8 8 9 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED Tx:4093391 969930 BETH PABST REGISTER OF DEEDS ST. CROIX CO., WI 12/20/2012 2:56 PM This Deed, made between Central Bank, a Minnesota banking. EXEMPT#: NA corporation successor-in-Interest to The RiverBank REC FEE: 30.00 Grantor, and, Oeverino Homes LLC a Wisconsin limited liability TRANS FEE- 126.00 company. Grantee, WITNESSETH, That the said Grantor, fora PAGES: 1 valuable consideration conveys to Grantees the following described real estate in St. Croix County, State of Wisconsin: RETURN T/O- Cr`AT `ca✓ ~ L e21QOc~.cfti Rd~ u~ a~ s PID 018-2015-00-005;705 P'I`~S j 018-2017-10-000; S 018-2017-14-000; 018-2017-15-000 Lot 5, Plat of Croix Hills in the Town of Hammond, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Lots 10, 14 and 15, Plat of Croix Hills 1 st Addition in the Town of Hammond, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Seller to convey the title by special warranty deed without covenants of the title or the equivalent for the state the property is located. Seller makes no representations or warranties, of any kind or nature whatsoever, whether expressed, implied, implied by law, or otherwise, concerning the condition of the title of the property. This is not homestead property. Dated this 30th day of November, 2012 Central Bank AUTHENTICATION (SEAL) Signature(s) BY: Zach MCBroom its assistant vice i president authenticated this day of (SEAL) TITLE: MEMBER STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN By: (If not, ACKNOWLEDGMENT authorized by s706.06, Wis. Stats.) STATE OF MN } } ss:. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY COUNTY OF Washington } Personally came before me this 30"' day of LOBERG LAW OFFICE November, 2012 the above named Central Bank Robert L. Lobera/1212485 ao by Zach McBroom, Its assistant vice president (Signatures may be authenticated or to me known to be the person s who executed the acknowledged. Both are not necessary) ap/ fore g instrument and acknowledge the same. * Je Hund e 'IQ JENNY C;;U; ary Public shington- County, MN. My ,111114olift - Commission is permanent. (If not, state expiration aV 111611 10 date: 1/31/2017 ) X-7] of 1 Safety and Buildings commerceml.gov 13 E SPRUCE STREET CHIPPEWA FALLS WI 54729 TDD (608) 264-8777 i 0%.on si n www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/ Department of Coinmerde www.wisconsin.gov RECEIVED Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary AUG 17 2006 August 03, 2006 ST. CROIX COUNTY CUST ID No. 42258 Inspector ELI M GOTTFRIED GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL ZONING OFFICE 124 1/2 GRAHAM AVE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA PO BOX 1645 1101 CARMICHAEL RD EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-1645 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 08/03/2008 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1275364 SITE: Troy French - French Homes Site ID No. 713333 Town of Hammond, St Croix County Please refer to Both identification numbers, SW 1/4, NW 1/4, S35, T29N, R17W above, 'in'all corres ondence with the agency. Lots: 1, 2, and 8 Subdivision: Croix Hills Subdivision FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1077636 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a planand an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. The following conditions apply to private onsite wastewater treatment system (POWTS) design and installation: GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is six inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of six inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and ispersa . . 3. The basal so it application rate for the mound shall be < 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate < 4.5 gpd/ft. Down slope toes will be designed using a> 4:1 i~ rather than the traditional 3:1 to ensure more than adequate basal area is available. r 4. Distribution cell orifice density shall be 6 sf/orifice. 5. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12-16 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 6. Special landscaping (drainage swale) up slope of the mound and/or of the up slope toe of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 7. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. I INTERPRETIVE REPORT RECEIVED JUL 3 1 2006 Gottfried Environmental SAFETY & BUILDINGS 124 Graham Avenue Eau Claire, WI. 54701 715-833-1400; 715-833-1381 fax 12 75 3 6 for: Troy French French Homes Inc. P.O. Box 350 Roberts, WI. 54023 715-718-2929 Site: SW NW 35 29 17W Croix Hills subdivision Hammond, St Croix County i I 1 Wisconsin f3epa,tmentofCommerce SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION Page Of Divisiixi of Safi--ty and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 '/z x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but County St. Croix not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to the nearest road. ( Pazcel ID # APPLICANT INFORMATION - Please print all information Reviewed By: Date: Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04(1)(m)). Property owner: Property location Troy French - French Homes Gov't lot: SW 1/4 NW 1/4 S35 T29 N, R17© Property owner's mailing address: Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# P.O. Box 350 15 NA Croix Hills City / State /Zip Code Phone number: city Village ow Nearest Road Roberts / WI/ 54023-0350 715-718-2929 Hammond 190th St. El New Construction Use ❑ Residential/Number of bedrooms 31.5 Addition to existing building: NA ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - describe - NA Code Design Flow Rate: 4,725 gallons/day Parent Material: Glacial Till - ground morraine General Comments and Recommendations: Soils are somewhat poorly drained Alfisols underlain by dense glacial till. This is an A+0 mound site. Redox features are the result of perching above and within the dense glacial till. Taxonomic classification: Aquic Glossoboralf SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FT'- BHP Eff#1 E1`1142 1 Ap 0-6 10YR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 2vf 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap-d 6-11 IOYR 2/2 NA sil Impl mfr aw, lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev (ft.) Bt 11-15 1OYR 4/4 m I d 7.5YR 5/8 sic] Imsbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 92.32 Depth to 2C 15-40 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive limiting factor- in. 0 Remarks: Bt horizon - very dense Boring # Ap 0-7 l OYR 3/2 NA sil 2fgr mfr aw 2vf 0.6 0.8 BHP Ap-d 7-9 l OYR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sil Impl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 2 Btl 9-11 10YR 4/4 NA A 2msbk mfr aw lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground Elev (ft.) Bt2 11 -13 IOYR 4/4 fld 7.5YR 5/8 sicl impl mfr cw lvf 0.4 0.6 97.80 2C 13-35 7.5YR 4/4 m2d 7.5YR 5/6 gr scl massive Depth to limiting in. 0 Remarks: BtI - small amount of clay CST Name: Eli M. Gottfried, Gottfried Environmental Signature: `~L llli' Tel. No. 715-833-1400 Address: 124-1/2 Graham Ave. Eau Claire, WI. 54701 Date: 31 May 2006; 15 June 2006 CST 4 221981 SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT ' • Property own 0r French, Troy Parcel ID# lot 1 Boxing # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description, Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FTZ BHP 3 Eff#1 Eff#2 Ap 0-7 10YR 3/2 NA sit 2mgr mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap-d 7-9 10YR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 A Impl mfr cw lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev (ft.) 95.80 Btl 9-12 7.5YR 4/4 fld 7.5YR 5/6 A ]msbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 Depth to Bt2 12-18 7.5YR 4/4 m2d 7.5YR 5/6 sic] Imsbk mfr aw NA 0.2 0.3 limiting factor- in. 2C 18-38 7.5YR 4/4 C2d 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive 0 Remarks: BtI - clay bridging Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/F-r2 BHP 4 Eff# I Eff#2 Ap 0-7 l OYR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap-d 7-11 10YR 3/2 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 A Impl mfr as lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev (ft.) 99.05 Btl 11-18 IOYR 4/4 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 sil 2msbk mfr cw NA 0.6 0.8 Depth to Bt2 18-20 7.5YR 4/4 m l d7.5YR 5/8 sic] 1 msbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 limiting factor- in. 2C 20-35 7.5YR 4/4 C2d 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive 0 Remarks:Bt horizon - Mn and clay bridging Boring # Ap 0-7 l O.YR 3/2 NA A 2msbk mfr as 1 of 0.6 0.8 BHPS Ap-d 7-9 10YR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sil lmpl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Btl 9-12 7.5YR 4/4 NA sil 2msbk mfr gw I of 0.4 0.6 Elev (ft.) 99.80 Bt2 12-17 7.5YR 4/4 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 sicl lmsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 00 Depth to 2C 17-28 7.5YR 4/6 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive limiting factor- in. 0 Remarks: This pit is located on lot 2; BtI horizon has clay bridging Boring # Ap 0-7 l OYR 2/2 NA A lmsbk mfr aw 2vf 0.4 0.6 Pit 6 Ap-d 7-12 1OYR 2/2 NA sil lmp] mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Bt 12-15 1OYR 4/4 m I d 7.5YR 5/8 sic] Imsbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 Elev (ft.) 2C 15-25 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive 93.80 Depth to limiting factor-in. 0 Hand dug, shallow pit; Btl horizon has clay bridging f Boring # Ap 0-7 1 OYR 2/2 NA sit 1 msbk mfr aw 2vf 0.4 0.6 Ptt 7 Ap-d 7-12 1OYR 2/2 NA sit Impl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Bt 12-18 l OYR 4/4 m 1 d 7.5YR 5/8 sic] 1 msbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 Ground Elev (ft.) 2C 18-22 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive 93.80 Depth to limiting factor-in. 0 hand boring w/ 5" auger and spade; Ap-d = plow pan Boring # Ap 0-8 IOYR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr as 1 of 0.6 0.8 Pit 8 Ap-d 8-10 IOYR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sil lmpl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Btl 10 -13 7.5YR 4/4 NA sil 2msbk mfr gw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Elev (ft.) Bt2 13-17 7.5YR 4/4 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sicl Imsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 99.80 Depth to 2C 17-30 7.5YR 4/6 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 set massive limiting factor- in. 0 BHP 8 is located on lot 4; clay coats in Btl horizon; very dense in 2C COUNTY PLAT OF: CROIX SILLS G~ $3750 GoQ~ »B~B R~ERI wdi_a IST ADDITION NW CORNER, SEC. 35 NW CORNER, SEC. 3S ~'HOJI. LOCATED IN PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF (TOOK BERNTSEN NAR) r SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 17 NEST, TOWN OF HAMMOND. ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN; I l Pew aD.N BEING OUTLOT 2 OF CROIX HILLS. N O O &1 ~ VOL 20 PC_5137 1 ti NORM LINE OF THE SW 114 - NW 1/4 1 LOCATION MAP; N 89'28'2S' E R0. (S89'56'44 E) 1 32.19' N 8928'25" E 1293.13' (NOT TO SCALE) R.A. (1272'). SECTNIN 35, T29N, R171T, 271.75- - Z - - - - - - - -684.34'- - - - - 337.04' - m3, - - UK •r I I 1 J10 I - - - e1 F N4 I I .4L44 S 77 PLAT LOT 15 N(W i LOT 10 I 1 NK=1D75.~ LOCATION Lt I M I 185109 S.F. jm '~°S~ 153636 S.F. 1.95 Ac. f SJ p' 3.53 Ac. U6' IJ ~ ~W 1 ~~Z I 661H STREET 1A3' 06'48'36" W 63.97' 33' - I . IN 06'48'36" W 1 I° to fsW SE 1 171 12' 184.26' _ ; - - - - s1,.as' - - - - - - N LOT 9 I N tz z 351.44' I I I I~ 344.68' -=4 159984 S.F. I ltri D 1 sa of AwRA D o i I N 88'24'09" E 1696.12' 0 I ° 3.67 Ac. I 00 0110 N 88'24'09' E ' 384.81' q I ID 6 r 0 6 L -183.98'- - I LOT 11 v l LBO = 1077.90 i m li ZW1 1 Im 220.63' of ' ; 10 I I , oc0' I 164.16' - - 102007 S.F. ro R^ I„ 2.34 Ac. ~I I I I IN is 1~ ! I I LOT 14 DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOTE 12162 S.F I : ful I i I I Y I I I I j l i M NO OW OR RWRSIUll 00MmIlm Na WAO IIoa LOT 73290 S13 .F. 1 m WIN IN w I 1.66 Ac.' I _ = 1-1 - - - 1 14 OHM H 07BIAWa NA M IPIAafD LOT 14 MAmaME amR aaux MR saR 6ROSNN nM 1 N I m \ Ra PVT. W W= Bur 6 or a IYED R' MORO wa. 7183 S.F. i0 - 66.00' OBS,NICNK, UK Him DA WAVATMC OR A ARM N I I Q ® 34184 3,'"'B I I 1 m 1.68 Ac. z AI IM ELg161M WAS Wma DO MS, MIER I 60.83' I i - AOM A WAR DARN M WA OR go smxas 1 I iW 1.65 Ac. ^ I S 01 / m 7' - I FAQ GENERAL NOTICE STATEMENT: 19 S 68)'42'58" W 468 6TH STREET I 0111111, MW u~K004 NIQUIN DE 'O r iA I 10 ZI 1 ~ 916' ~ / ~ ' W - - y11 ~I I I I ) W 1~ / , \ IEWMIS. OWN 601 M AAMSS a PMM2 EW:1 WORT C I{ I "--l - - I - ` 'm =OR, iRK ORM M B AxIM1ME DE16aN6 MR PAMQ 61x8, mABt WA MMB B fm I' UTILITY EASEMENTS: I S 89'25'10" W. LLT 7 ( LOLQ 5671256^d q5 / 8673, 11 Pat ORW8CARES MFaBEUSBANMATM ' 60.00' / 1j{tu! / jOlQ QY~f~N~S I T CORE I R OF BWAum Im mm ANr sm BIAS, OR IB m m j ~ _ L AIpK MR ION IBE OA SRQ,IIE PE OISNMMS OFA9MxY I - , NAM Br MME 6 A WRAWM a3, op 2X9 VOW I N 00'34'50" W m Q - 5/ SIAiM VOUIf BASWM AS NOM Yt f" AH Fa M uY I I (1 S6 aFMRKemaAMPR'AAE/Pmu mEBaxleARatt0 In it AEA 1 m o s 8NOTES: s 250" w ~'1~r ` u mar srxa • BB DAeas OA6M W a IT 0- 0 146.82' ° i \ ea (16A.RPlD ma Ra-p BN s18Aa. 121 -r- - - MM nO 2F I LEGEND: NL "m ro M mmm R ream RM "W -ROADWAY SETBAM ® PROPOSED ORAE61AY EOCATION FAMIS 80ll HAVE A IMBSt wilm"RN OR "I" ~ ~ jDTl val. Dialm NOT ONTO Nom. LLE BOA a0 FEET WK nE WI a,m 6 5 Qp 12' O1MTY EASEMENT PRE HIM win EBEVATMI 33' 33 CRQII(~ 9A - L DRAINAGE EASFAENT LINE ;BO LOMST "m NPm WHITE! MINTY WOMRIENT R.A. AECOAOm As S2If8 Wong (FOUND AS NOTED) K B FWND 1' IRON PPE (FOUND W I/ 2 3/CORNER f 4 /8' , U. SEC, IRON JS PPE) FOM 3/4• BY NT IRON PIN 7 0 FOR 11/4' BY IV NON PIN SET 3/47 BY If NON PIN SME: I' • IV WT. 1.50 imp, ® AT Al OTHER LOT COMERS 0 40 BD 60 pEFEADIQO ro ALL BEM An CURVE DATA TABLE: THE WEST X OF M NO 1/1 OW TO BEAR S OD0f5r E. mw PAb6 3,n ARC 11XOWI nn DDA ANBE tIMI IE16111 fn aMm aNECAa rAMIMt N iRKOIi M M 6llA0 201.p 3631M6• 101.11 S 76,555• W f BVu W S 62W6'fr' M Ct 367.00 11041 2061f ma88 3 76WYOI' W S 6718'52• 115 fty W TED BC OF WA ROO MEY DIO EDIX ND 1 OF 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 RATIONAL FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT 3 GEOLOGICAL HISTORY 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE 5 Lots 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 5 Locations of Proposed Mounds: 5 Lot 2 5 Observations: 5 Lot 2 Discussion: 6 Soil Structure: 6 Redoximorphic Features: 6 High Groundwater: 6 Drainage: 6 Lot 6 7 Observations: 7 Lot 6 Discussion: 7 Soil Structure 7 Redoximorphic Features: 7 High Groundwater: 7 Drainage: 7 Lot 7 7 Observations: 7 Lot 7 Discussion: 8 Soil Structure: 8 Redoximorphic Features: 8 High Groundwater: 8 Drainage: 8 Lot 8 9 Observations: 9 Lot 8 Discussion: 9 Soil Structure: 9 Redoximorphic Features: 9 High Groundwater: 9 Drainage: 9 Lot 9 9 Observations: 9 Lot 9 Discussion: 10 Soil Structure: 10 Redoximorphic Features: 10 High Groundwater: 10 Drainage: 10 Lots 1, 3, 4 (portion) 10 1 . Locations of Proposed Mounds: - . 10 Lot 1 10 Observations: 10 Lot 1 Discussion: 11 Soil Structure: I 1 Redoximorphic Features: 11 High Groundwater: 11 Drainage: 11 General Comments Relating to All Four Sites 12 Drainage class 12 Topographic Considerations 12 Local Hydrology 12 Aquic Moisture Regime 13 Tillage 14 EXPLANATION FOR CURRENT SOIL CONDITIONS 14 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SOIL TESTS 15 CONCLUSIONS 15 PROPOSALS 16 3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate less than or equal to 4.5 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and / or occupancy that can be serviced on the site 16 4. The basal soil application rate must less than or equal to 0.3 gpsqft per day 16 5. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C-33 sand must be used under the laterals 16 6. Chisel plowing must be employed under the absorption area down to a depth of 12 inches 16 7. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches 16 8. Slopes down-slope of the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3. This increases the toe absorption area 16 9. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to divert water around the mounds, unless the mound is to located at - or near - the crest of the topographic high. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water from being trapped in the mounds. Alternatively, the mound can be constructed so that the "J" slope is wider in the center of the mound so that water is diverted to either side 16 REFERENCES 21 2 GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL 124 Graham Ave., Eau Claire, WI 54701; 715-833-1400 telephone: 715-833-1400; fax: 715-833-1381; email: elicstm(a sbcj!lobal.net INTERPRETATIVE REPORT 14 March 2006; Revised 19 July 2006 based on the recommendations of Leroy Jansky, Wastewater Specialist for the State of Wisconsin Proper owner: French Homes Inc. Legal Description: SW NW 35 29 17W Hammond, St. Croix County INTRODUCTION From 1 December to 6 December 2005, soil evaluations were conducted by me on the property described above. The soil evaluations were done in response to a request by the soil tester, Mr. David Steel of Steel Soil Testing Services, in order to determine the suitability f the evaluated lots for the construction of on-site wastewater treatment systems. The sites in question all displayed redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the Ap horizon. This feature, according to Wisconsin Administrator Code, does not allow for the construction of a standard POWTS. Instead, it requires that it be determined that seasonal saturation does not extend into the Ap horizon. It is the intention of the property owner(s), French Homes Incorporated, to subdivide this 40 Acre (approximate) portion of land into 18 lots. Of the 18 lots, 5 have been reviewed as A+0 mound sites. RATIONAL FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT High and low chroma features in the soil as compared with matrix soil colors are considered as indicators of seasonal saturation in the State of Wisconsin. Department of Commerce Comm 81.01 (118) states: "High groundwater" means zones of soil saturation which include perched water tables, shallow regional groundwater tables or aquifers, or zones that are seasonally, periodically or permanently saturated. Comm 81.01 (119) further defines evidence of seasonal saturation in the soils: "High groundwater elevation" means the higher of either the elevation to which the soil is saturated when observed as a free water surface, or the elevation to which the soil has been seasonally or periodically saturated as indicated by the highest elevation of redoximorphic features in the soils. At least 36 inches of soil separation is required between the bottom of the soil absorption system 3 and the redoximorphic soil features in most types of soils (Table 83.44-3, Department of 4 Commerce). Where this does not exist, an above ground SAS must be constructed (i.e. mound or At-Grade). The initial determination of this site has found the site to be unsuitable for mound type septic systems (Soil Absorption System), as per WAC Comm 85.30(2)(a) and (b). This code section mandates that: 1. Redoximorphic features be used as an indicator of seasonal saturation in the soils. 2. Redoximorphic features appearing at depths of within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon shall be interpreted as seasonal saturation occurring at ground surface ("Unless determined otherwise..., the highest elevation of seasonal soil saturation shall be the ground surface where redoximorphic features are present within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon.") Although Comm 85.30(2)(b) mandates that redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the A horizon be interpreted as seasonal saturation to ground surface, Comm 85.60(2)(a) allows for an interpretive determination of the soil conditions and depth to seasonal saturation should this condition exist. This section states in part: "A written report by a certified soil tester evaluating and interpreting redoximorphic soil features may be submitted to the department in lieu of high groundwater determination data. The written report shall conclusively demonstrate that the existing soil morphological features or color patterns are not indicative of current conditions of periodic soil saturation." This is the basis for the current report. GEOLOGICAL HISTORY The subsurface formation in St. Croix County consists of the Prairie Du Chien Group (dolomite and sandy dolomite). Depth to bedrock ranges from 0 - 15 meters (Brown, B.A. (1988)). This formation is of Ordovician origin (Paleozoic era 425 mya). Dolomite appears to have been laid during the early Ordovician period, while the sandstone was laid during the late part of the period (Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977)). Glaciation of St. Croix County occurred many times during the history of the earth, although the most recent glaciation, during the Pleistocene epoch (approximately 1 million to 10,000 years before present), is the most apparent. There were several stages of glacial advance, the most recent being the Wisconsinan stage. This was the result of the advance of the Superior Lobe and, from this, the Chippewa Lobe (Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin). St. Croix County appears to be part of the geographical province of the Western Upland. As noted by Paull et al (Paull, R.K., R.A. Paull (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA), "The Paleozoic rocks are the retreating erosional edges of marine sediments that once extended across the Northern Highland.... Late Cambrian seas washed over the Precambrian erosional surface to deposit more than 1,000 feet of sandstone, with minor amounts of interbedded dolomite." 4 The St. Croix River has its origin in the Northern Highlands and its resistant Precambrian rock. The loess deposits in St. Croix County appear to be the result of the westerly winds carrying fine textured soils easterly to the eastern bluffs of the river and beyond. The soils observed on site suggest that the area has been influenced by glaciation. Soils appear to be loess (fine-textured, wind blown soil), underlain by glacial till. The glacial till present as parent material in the subsoil of the site is most likely the result of deposit from the Superior Lobe (Chippewa Lobe) material. Loess, present as soil of the Ap horizon, may be the result of the influence of the wind-blown fines of the St Croix River floodplain. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE The parcel of land under investigation lays in the SW'/4 of the NW'/4 of Section 35, 29N, R17W, Hammond Township, St. Croix County. All land lays east of 190th Street, and south of County Road J. The proposed subdivision it is composed of an approximately 1400 feet long hill laying approximately East-West. The hill is composed of soils which are primarily silt loam underlain by sandy clay loam glacial till. The hill appears to be a terminal moraine. The evaluated sites are located on the north facing portion of the land area and extend west and slightly north, following the hill slope. Initially there were 5 sites to review. Several more sites, located on the west portion of the hill were added, evaluated and designated suitable for A+0 mounds (see plot plan). Lots 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 Locations of Proposed Mounds: Lot 2 - South portion of the proposed subdivision, bordering 190th Street Lot 6 - North-central portion of lot, approximately 630 feet east of 190th Street Lot 7 - North-central portion of lot, approximately 800 feet east of 190th Street Lot 8 - Central portion of lot, approximately 1000 feet east of 190th Street Lot 9 - South portion of lot, approximately 1200 feet east of 190th Street Lot 2 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam - Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Typic Glossoboralfs Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 4% south-southwest. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Soils in the Ap horizon had moderate structure and many fine roots. Few fine worm channels 5 I were present in both the Ap and the Bt horizons. Soil colors in the Ap horizon were dark brown (IOYR 3/2). Soil density became apparent in the C horizon (glacial till parent material) at a depth of 21 inches (approximate). Redox features were faint in the bottom of the Ap horizon. This is designated as Ap-d in the soils report. Soils in this horizon (Ap-d) were platy in structure. E and Bt horizons displayed faint redox features. Redox features increased in intensity, size and frequency as depth increased. No redox features were observed in the root channels or in the worm channels of the Ap horizon. Soils remained moist throughout the profile. No saturation was observed. Lot 2 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (1 OYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 2. In the platy Ap-d and E horizons, faint redox features were present. Although platey, the grade was weak, indicating that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. No redox features were observed in the upper portion of the Bt horizon. Structure in this area of the profile was moderate blocky. In the lower portion of the Bt horizon, redox features were observed. Structure here was weak. The C horizon was composed of massive sandy clay loam with distinct to prominent redox features. This horizon is geomorphically disconnected from the horizons above (lithologic discontinuity) and represents a glacial till parent material. The soils above are probably of loess origin. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint in the Ap-d and E horizons, absent in the upper portion of the Bt horizon, and present again in the lower portion of the Bt horizon and in the 2C horizon below. This suggests that there are 2 factors contributing to the presence of redoximorphic features. In the upper layer, the appearance of redox features may be a reflection of poor farming-practices and poor soil stewardship. In the lower horizons, the redox features are a true indicator of seasonal saturation. Redox features in this lower horizon gradually increase in intensity and spatially. This suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS on lot 2. However, shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 92.40' (5 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed SAS). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. In addition, this area was not farmed, indicating poor drainage. This soil pit, located 142 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A+0 mound displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 4% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. 6 Lot 6 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam - Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) - Typic Glossoboralfs (old designation for this soil series) Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 5% north. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 8 inches Depth to limiting factor: 6 inches Lot 6 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 2/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen for the 1" 6 inches. The lack of redoximorphic features in the first 6 inches of the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. However, the lower part of the Ap horizon (designated Ap-d) was platy and displayed faint to distinct redox features. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 6 at 0 - 6 inches. Structure in the Ap-d and E horizons was weakly platey. Water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically in this horizon. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were distinct in the bottom of the A horizon as well as in the Bt horizon and increased in intensity and number the further down the profile. There was a small and discontinuous E horizon on the pits on lot 6. BHP's 1 and 3 lacked the E horizon. Absence of an E Horizon in BHP's 1 and 3 may have been due to plowing. The distinct, continuous redoximorphic features and the increase as one descends in the profile suggests that there is a seasonally high water table on this lot. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions may exist into the Ap horizon and within 6 inches of the surface during the wetter times of the year. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. However, shallow very wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.10' (4.4 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed cell of the SAS). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. This soil pit, located 110 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A+0 mound displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area for a part of the year. Lot 7 Observations: 7 Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam - Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) - Typic Glossoboralfs (old designation for this soil series) Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 5% north-northwest Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9 inches Depth to limiting factor: 6 inches Lot 7 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield to a depth of 6 inches. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (1 OYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for the 3 pits observed on lot 7. Structure was weak in the platy Ap-d horizon from 6 to 9 inches. No E horizon was observed. The E horizon may have been eliminated as a result of plowing. No localized compaction (as a result of wheel traffic) was observed at the 0 to 6 inch depth. This may be a reflection of tillage. Evidence of compaction due to wheel traffic was evident in the platy Ap-d horizon. Density in the C horizon (parent material - glacial till) was observed, as was distinct to prominent redoximorphic features. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint to distinct in the Ap-d horizon, distinct in the Bt horizon, and prominent in the lower part of the Bt horizon and the massive 2C horizon. This suggests that there is a gradual increase in the amount of time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase as one descends down the profile. The presence of redox features in the Ap-d horizon and the continuous nature of the redox features descending down the profile suggest that seasonal saturation may be a factor on this site extending up to (and perhaps including) the Ap horizon. However, no redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. However, shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 93.80' (4.3 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed SAS cell). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. This soil pit, located 100 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A+0 mound, displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. 8 Lot 8 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam - Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) - Typic Glossoboralfs Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 6% north-northeast. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 8 inches Depth to limiting factor: 8 inches Lot 8 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (IOYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 8. No E Horizon was present in BHP's 2, 3, and 4, probably as a result of deep plowing. In BHP 1 an E horizon was present. This horizon had a characteristic platey structure. The structure was weak, allowing for water movement. Overall, structure in the A horizon for all the pits appeared to be unaffected by plowing, displaying good structure and observable macropores. There was also evidence of biological activity - worm channels and extensive roots in the Ap horizon. Field traffic (farm machinery) did not appear to have compacted soils or destroyed structure in the area of the proposed mound. No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS, in spite of the tendency for fine-textured soils that have been plowed to puddle. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were distinct, although few, in the horizon immediately below the Ap horizon. Intensity and number of redox features increased lower in the soil profile in each of the pits, suggesting a gradual increase in the amount time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: Shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at anA elevation of 94.50' on Lot 9. This pit was approximately 95 feet north of the 98.70 contour line. Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 6% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. Lot 9 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam - Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) - Typic Glossoboralfs (older designation - currently designated as Oxyaquic Glossoboralf). Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 5% north-northeast. 9 Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 7 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Lot 9 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 2/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that this may be a wet area and that drainage is poor. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 9. Only the Backhoe pit designated as BHP 1 displayed an E horizon. In the E horizon platey structure was observed, although the platyness was weak. This suggests that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. Neither BHP2 nor BHP 3 showed an E horizon. This is most likely due to the degree and depth of plowing. No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint to distinct in the Ap and Bt horizon and increased in intensity and number the further down the profile. This suggests that there is a gradual increase in the amount time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. Redox features were observed in the worm channels and the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: Shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.50' on Lot 9. This pit was approximately 95 feet north of the 98.70 contour line. Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. Lots 1, 3, 4 (portion) Locations of Proposed Mounds: Due to the unsuitability of lots 6, 7, 9 for mound systems, lot 1 and a portion of lot 3 and 4 has been designated for construction of mound systems. These mounds will service the residences to be located on lots 6, 7, 9. See accompanying plot plan. Lot 1 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam - Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Typic Glossoboralfs Slope/Aspect as determined on site: 4% to 4.5% north-northeast. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9-11 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Soils in the Ap horizon had moderate structure and many fine roots. Few fine worm channels 10 were present in both the Ap and the Bt horizons: Soil colors in the Ap horizon were dark brown (1OYR 3/2). Soil density became apparent in the C horizon (glacial till parent material) at a depth of 18 inches (approximate). Redox features were faint in the bottom of the Ap horizon. This is designated as Ap-d in the soils report. Soils in this horizon (Ap-d) were platy in structure. Bt horizons displayed faint redox features. Redox features increased in intensity, size and frequency as depth increased. No redox features were observed in the root channels or in the worm channels of the Ap horizon. Soils remained moist throughout the profile. No saturation was observed. Lot 1 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (1 OYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 1 and proposed mounds associated with lot 1 (pits on lots 2, 3, 4). In the platy Ap-d horizon, faint redox features were present. Although platey, the grade was weak, indicating that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. No redox features were observed in the upper portion of the Bt horizon in several pits. Structure in this area of the profile was moderate blocky. In the lower portion of the Bt horizon, redox features were observed. Structure here was weak. The C horizon was composed of massive sandy clay loam with distinct.to prominent redox features. This horizon is geomorphically disconnected from the horizons above (lithologic discontinuity) and represents a glacial till parent material. The soils above are probably of loess origin. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint in the Ap-d horizon where present, absent in the upper portion of the Bt horizon, and present again in the lower portion of the Bt horizon and in the 2C horizon below. This suggests that there are 2 factors contributing to the presence of redoximorphic features. In the upper layer, the appearance of redox features may be a reflection of poor farming practices and poor soil stewardship. In the lower horizons, the redox features are a true indicator of seasonal saturation. Redox features in this lower horizon gradually increase in intensity and spatially. This suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worn channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. In profiles where structure remained moderate subangular blocky, redox features appeared gradually starting with faint features in the upper part of Bt horizon. This indicates that the Ap horizon is aerated and that anaerobic conditions begin gradually and increase as one descends down the soil profile. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS's on lot 1. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound systems is moderate. The 4% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the 11 drainage area. General Comments Relating to All Four Sites Drainage class: The soil survey manual notes that the drainage class for the soils on this site is "moderately well-drained." In agricultural terms, this is defined as "Soils that have periods of excessive wetness that adversely affect planting or harvesting operations or that reduce yields of some field crops." However, fields classified as moderately well drained are still capable of producing significant crop yields. This site has been used for corn production, indicating that the soils drain well enough for cultivation during a part of the year. No artificial drainage is used on this site. The areas established as mound sites all had grown corn in previous years. Non-agricultural definitions for drainage class deal with depth to high groundwater. The Soil Science Manual from the University of Minnesota (Burgess Publishing) defines moderately well drained as depth to high groundwater of greater than 3 feet. It further states "No mottles in the upper B horizon, gray mottles in lower B." All designated mound sites were free of gray redox features within 4 inches of the Ap horizon. No standing water was observed in the backhoe pits. i The soils described in the areas of the proposed A+0 mounds are located in the highest or close to the highest points on the land on the north and northeast portion of the proposed subdivision. Therefore, they are elevated above a permanent water table. It should be noted that the drainage class designation is based on slopes as well as depth to groundwater and textural classes. Thus, it is possible to have a site located on a high point on the landscape, have poor texture and structure, but have a "well-drained" classification if slopes are steep enough. Topographic Considerations: All proposed mound sites are located on either convex or straight slopes. None of the 6 A+0 sites (lot 2, 4 on lot 1, lot 8) are located on concave slopes or in watrerways. Therefore, they are not located in areas where water can congregate. In addition, no sites are located in designated wetlands. Local Hydrology: As noted on the accompanying plot plans, the proposed dispersal sites have slopes ranging from 4% to 6%. Local waterways exists on the property, although not in the area of the proposed A+0 mounds. The Rush River flows north-south and lays approximately 1 mile east of the proposed subdivision. The Kinnickinnic River is approximately 2 miles west of the site and flows approximately east-west. Subsurface regional flow (groundwater flow) is most likely west towards the St. Croix River. On-site observations agree with the site description as noted in the NRCS publication, Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin (USDA publication) and the soil data reported on the web site http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov. Soils are classified as Typic Glossoboralfs in the Soil Survey published in 1972. However, the NRCS has redesignated these soils as Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs. Typic Glossoboralfs have a boric temperature regime with elluvial and illuvial horizons which are saturated at some time during the year (as evidenced by the redoximorphic 12 features). Oxyaquic Glossoborlafs have a similar profile to the Typic soils, but are darker in the Ap horizon and have an Aquic moisture regime. The profile is described as being slightly acidic, suggesting that the profile is aged. The aging may be due to a greater than average amount of water movement through the soil. Specifically, soils in this area are mapped Freeon (FnB). According to the St Croix County Soil Survey book, native vegetation for this area was primarily white pine, red oak, and hard maple. According to the National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region), (copyright 1998, Chanticleer Press Inc., NY, NY), white pine grows in well-drained soils. Red Oak (also known as Scarlet Oak and Black Oak), grows in upland ridges and slopes. Maple grows in upland moist soils. All 3 types of trees therefore, appear to grow in well-drained or moderately well-drained soils. In relation to their tendency to grow in wetlands or histic soils, the 3 are classified as facultative plants (red, silver maple), or non-wetland plants (white pine). The publication notes that this soil type "consists of gently sloping and sloping, moderately well- drained soils." The publication goes on further to describe the lower part of the profile as becoming "saturated with water for long periods of time." Although not observed, significant redox features in the lower part of the subsoil indicate that this is a saturation does take place at some time during the year and that this condition persists for extended periods of time. Aquic Moisture Regime: "Keys to Soil Taxonomy" (6th Edition, 1994) notes that "The Aquic moisture regime signifies a reducing regime in a soil that is virtually free of dissolved oxygen because it is saturated by groundwater or by water of the capillary fringe." The text continues, "It is not known how long a soil must be saturated to have an Aquic moisture regime, but the duration must be at a least a few days because it is implicit in the concept that dissolved oxygen is virtually absent. Because dissolved oxygen is removed by respiration of micro- organisms, roots, and soil fauna, it is also implicit in the concept that the soil temperature is above biologic zero for some time while the soil is saturated." In another portion of the publication, Keys to Soil Taxonomy defines aquic conditions as: "those [soils] which currently experience continuous or periodic saturation and reduction.... Saturation is characterized by zero or positive pressure in the soil-water and can generally be determined by observing free water in an unlined auger hole." In neither auger holes nor shallow hand-dug pits was standing water observed in the epipedon. In addition, soil colors in the epipedon were not those characteristic of organic soils (IOYR 2/2). As noted previously, the placement of the A+0 mounds are on the highest or near the highest grounds on the site. Therefore, a high water table is not an issue on these sites. In addition, the mounds are sited on sloping sites, away from areas of water congregation. The presence of a capillary fringe, common where there is a large discrepancy between hydraulic conductivities between horizons (typically, coarse textured soil overlain by a much finer textured soil) is not found on these sites. Biological activity appears to be high as evidenced by the number of root channels and worm channels. Oxygen depletion appears not to be a phenomenon in the upper horizons as indicated 13 by the lack of reduced or oxidized areas in the chanrnels. Tillage: Tillage can both aerate soil and cause anoxic conditions in the soil. In the short term, tillage will break up soil clumps, freeing trapped nutrients and exposing more of the soil to the air. This, in turn, will cause more breakdown of organic material. In the long run, tilling the soil will break soil peds and destroy soil structure, thus destroying macropores that will contribute to aeration and water infiltration. In addition, the physical action of moving a heavy piece of machinery across the land, especially in wet weather, will compact fine-textured soil. The soils on site appear not to have been negatively impacted by tilling. On all proposed parcels, the soils of the epipedon were moderate structured, subangular blocky, indicating that tillage had not adversely affect the structure. As noted in the soil reports and in the body of this report, subsoils were present which had platy structure. In some cases, the platyness was due to natural causes (resulting in an E horizon). In some cases, the plantiness was found in the lower part of the A horizon (Ap-d), suggesting that this was the result of plowing (plowpan or plowsole). EXPLANATION FOR CURRENT SOIL CONDITIONS The proposed subdivision lays on a hill which lays in a general east-west direction. Slopes are approximately 5 to 8% throughout. Given the size, slope, aspects and underlying parent material, the subdivision appears to be part of a terminal moraine. During the many days that I have worked on this site, there has always been a moderate to strong wind from the southwest to the northeast. This is not unusual, since the majority of our weather pattern is the result of prevailing westerly winds with either moisture being carried from the south to the north (low pressure) or arctic winds (high pressure) coming from the northwest. These winds, as well as the relatively direct exposure of the south slope to the sun, may account for a more well developed soil profile on the south face of the moraine as opposed to the north face of the moraine. This, in turn, may account for more A horizon on the south slope relative to the north facing slope. Farm practices may also play a role in the soil development on this site. If a more southerly exposure has resulted in more soil development and an earlier warm-up of soil on the south facing slope, then these soils are less prone to "damage" from tillage at an earlier time in the spring than the soils on the north-facing slope. It is generally accepted that fine-textured soils are more prone to structural damage if plowed when wet or frozen. To prevent this, a different planting schedule would have to have been implemented on this site so that the south slope was plowed and seeded at least a week or 2 before the north face. Alternatively, the north facing slope should have been minimally tilled. These practices were not used on this site. As a result, soils on the north face are shallower with less structure than the soils on the south face. However, as the slope is directed more in a southerly or westerly direction, as in the case of lot 1, soils are more closely aligned with the soil forming factors and environmental conditions of the south facing slope. Thus lot 1 has soils which are more well-developed than lot 9. This being said, lot 1, as well as lot 8 display soil conditions that will require additional fill and 14 r specialized geometry to accommodate the limitations in the soil. These sites have soils that have a compacted lower Ap horizon (Ap-d) which is weakly platey. This Ap-d horizon, unlike the soils further east, does not display distinct redoximorphic features. Some faint 7.5YR 5/6 redox features were observed, but these features were not continuous with redox features in the lower portion of the soil profile (horizons Btl and Bt2). The platiness may be related to the effects of farm machinery. Structure below the Ap-d horizon is moderate blocky with few redoximorphic features. As noted on the accompanying soil tests, it is proposed that lot 1 be used to support 4 mounds. These mounds will service lots 9, 7, 6, and 1. Lot 2 will have its own mound system, as will lot 8. It is not readily apparent why lot 8 has more well-developed soil than the soils found on lots on either side of it. Soils iri the area of lot 1 appear suitable for mound types of septic systems, albeit with A+0 soil horizons. As one moves east on the north portion of the slope, soils become less suitable to support mound systems. Soils on lots 6, 7, and 9 are unsuitable for any type of on-site septic system. Soils on lot 8 appear suitable for a mound system. All lots on the south slope of the proposed subdivision are suitable for mounds. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SOIL TESTS Where soil tests were done by me, Mr. David Steel and Mr. Leroy Jansky, differences may exist in the report of soil features. These differences may be related to the time of year when the tests were conducted (summer versus winter), time of day (morning versus afternoon), observer interpretation, angle of pit. In the case of the evaluations made by me versus Mr. Steel, the final evaluations made by me on this site were conducted in June. Soils were dry and free of frost. Lighting was good. Due to time constraints placed on Mr. Steel, many of his evaluations had to be conducted during the late fall when the angle of the sun was not ideal and the soils were cold. CONCLUSIONS A combination of cultural (i.e. farming practices) and environmental factors may have been at work in the creation of soil conditions found on this proposed subdivision. However the soils developed though, it is apparent that soils on lots 6, 7, and 9 are unsuitable for mound type of septic systems. No redoximorphic features were observed for at least 9 inches of the Ap horizon in any of the pits evaluated. The soils in this upper 9 inches appeared to be well aerated with the presence of roots and worm channels. Water movement therefore appears to take place in this upper layer. There does not appear to be a condition of ponding for any significant period of time in this upper layer. Redoximorphic concentrations appeared in the soils gradually, starting at approximately 9 inches (faint) and increasing in intensity (prominent) at lower depths. The faint redox concentrations may have been accompanied by redox depletions in the macropores although this was not observed. Slopes in all the proposed A+0 sites were gentle and either convex or straight. The A+0 mounds were not located on concave slopes. Water movement will be away from the mounds and will radiate outward. 15 1 A ' PROPOSALS This soil tester feels that mound systems on these sites would adequately provide effluent treatment and dispersal as long as the follows design conditions are implemented: 1. The construction of the soil absorption systems must be in the area designated on the plot plans. 2. Areas lower in the landscape must not be used for soil absorption systems. 3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate less than or equal to 4.5 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and / or occupancy that can be serviced on the site. 4. The basal soil application rate must less than or equal to 0.3 gpsqft per day 5. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C-33 sand must be used under the laterals 6. Chisel plowing must be employed under the absorption area down to a depth of 12 inches 7. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches. 8. Slopes down-slope of the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3. This increases the toe absorption area. 9. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to divert water around the mounds, unless the mound is to located at - or near - the crest of the topographic high. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water from being trapped in the mounds. Alternatively, the mound can be constructed so that the "J" slope is wider in the center of the mound so that water is diverted to either side. If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact me at the above address and/or telephone number. Sincerely, A Eli M. Gottfried Registered Sanitarian (80806), CST (221981), Licensed Designer (1310) 16 III sc , Z ~ ♦ r . 4 A I 3i A L l - TL4jn.... ;s i Y ~ - 1 a st v: t~ V it2 Attachment 1 - Aerial map for the French Homes Inc development. Arrow points to approximate locations of mounds on lots 2, 6, 7, 8, 9. 17 ~4 41 f~ l 90 f Attachment 2. Topographic map showing the approximate locations of the sites. Note that none of the sites lay in a waterway or in an area of converging slopes. In addition, no designated wetlands are evident on the map. 18 French Homes - Sample mound plan view with linear loading rate of 4.5 for a 4 bedroom residence Dimensions and Footprints for gravel, sand, and fill fill - X ft. sand Gravel Area U ft. W W ft. I. Bed (Cell): Dimensions: 133 ft. x 4.5 ft. Sand: x = 8.82 ft. (based on 3:1 slope) w =16.44 ft (based on 4:1 slope) u = 10.12 ft (based on 3:1 slope) Overall sand footprint = 170.23 ft x 29.26 ft Volume of sand: 623 cubic yards. THIS VOLUME IS FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES ONLY. Fill: J =10.16 ft. I =18.82 ft. V = 13.12 ft. Overall fill footprint = 166.88 ft. x 32.98 ft. Installer: Sand amount is an estimate only. Please check this figure and compare it to similar sites that you are familiar with. 19 GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL Diversion Ditch - Sample C iradient to blend into - Z atural landscape S- T W X Y g B B 5:1 slope all around ditch except stormwater outlet from ditch. Stormwater to be diverted around south end of mound soil absorption system. DIVERSION DITCH DETAIL NOTE THAT THIS DIAGRAM REPRESENTS %2 OF THE DRAINAGE DITCH A=1ft. B=5ft. C=80 ft. D= 1 ft. Grade Elevations: Trench Elevations: S=104.90 ft. S = 103.06, A = 1.0 ft, B = 13.75 ft,D=1.84 ft. T = 104.90 ft. T = 103.23 ft. W = 104.90 ft. W = 103.40 ft. X = 104.90 ft. X = 103.56 ft. Y = 104.90 ft. Y = 103.73 ft. Z=104.90 ft. Z=103.90 ft.,A=1.Oft.,B=5.0ft,D=1.0ft. The bottom of the trench should be smoothed so that water flows evenly from the center to the end. Total drop from the center of the diversion ditch to the end is 10 inches. Drop is 1/8" per ft. 20 REFERENCES 1. Brown, B.A. (1988) Bedrock Geology of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin- Extension, Madison Wisconsin. rn 2. Keys to Soil Taxonomy (1994) 6h Edition. Soil Survey Staff, UY ( ) y .S. Department of Agriculture. Pocahontas Press, Inc. Blacksburg, Virginia. 3. Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin 4. Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 5. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region): (1998) Chanticleer Press Inc., NY, NY 6. Soil survey of St Croix County (1978). United States Dept of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Research Division of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin. 7. Soil Survey Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture (1994) Keys to Soil Taxonomy Sixth Edition, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Pocahontas Press Inc., Blacksburg, Virginia. 21 WNIIIueit'V.WI.gU'V SAFETY AND BUll-AINCS, MVIRIoN• integrated services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street i ++C~ns n INSPECTION REPORT Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 www.commerce.wi.gov/sb Department of Commerce (715) 726-2544 Date of Inspection: June 7, 2006 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: French NA Use: Residential Legal Description: SW, NW, 35, 29, 17W Site Number: 713333 EtV t ie Soil Tester Name and Address: Subdivision: Croix Hills F4, Municipality: Town of Hammond Ii M. Gottfried, CST 42258 County: St. Croix O Box 1645 , 2006 au 06re, WI 54702-1645 Plan Transaction Number: 12753 Sanitary Permit Number: NA ST. CROIXCO0170'tAer ame and Address: roy French Wastewater Flow: 300-600 gpd PO Box 350 Persons Present: Owner, E. Gottfried, D. Roberts, WI 54023 Steel, R. Yarrington An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. Soil data verified is as follows: BHP-4 00-07"10YR 3/2 sil.2csbk: 07-11" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2msbk parting to pl, mfr, as, w/ f 1 d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 11-19" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2msbk, mfr, cw, w/ c3d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 19-24" 7.5YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk, mfr w/c3d 7.5YR 5/6 and 10YR 5/3 rmfs. BHP-1 00-05" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2msbk, mfr, aw. 05-09" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2csbk, mfr, as, w/ f1 d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09-12" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2mpl, mfr, cw, w/ c2f 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 12-16" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2msbk, mfr w/. c2f 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. BHP-1A 00-08" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2csbk, mfr, cw. 08-09" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2fpl, mfr, as, w/ f1 d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09-13" 10YR 4/2 sil, 2mpl, mfr, cw, w/ c2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 13-18" 10YR 4/3 sil, 2m-cpl, mfr, cw, w/ f2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 18-24" 10YR 4/3 sil, 2msbk, mfr w/. f2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. BHP at intersection of Lots 1. 2 and 3 A ) 131 /Z) Similar to BHP-4 c3d Fe conc in the lower A horizon. Five to six inches of A horizon w/o rmfs. Subsoil below the A horizon has has rmfs. Page 2of2 June 7, 2006 Troy French site Lot 8 On lot 8 at a location approximately midpoint along the proposed system contour and 15 ft up slope conditions were noted to be acceptable to a depth of 15 inches (0-8" 10YR 3/3 sil, 8-15" 7.5YR 4/4 grscl with no rmfs). Lot 9 On lot 9, on the far west end of the proposed system contour the upper 7 inches of the A horizon had no rmfs but the lower 3 inches did have rmfs as Fe concentrations. The subsoil was a 10YR 4/4 scl with f2f 10YR 5/6 rmfs. The east side of lot 8 might be used for part of the system for lot 9. Lots 10, 12, 14, and 16 ~od Soil conditions on the north side of the proposed subdivision were.also reviewed, although this area is not part of the interpretative determination for lots 1-9. The pits,evaluated all had greater than A+4 conditions. Briefly, lot 10 had A+6", lot 12 had A+16", lot 14 had A+ 11", and lot 16 had A+10". General The use of a common off lot (lot 1) area for installation of a common mound or separate mounds would be acceptable with county approval (for a common system). Other sites appear acceptable for long and narrow mounds with appropriate depths of sand fill. Final landscaping should be as per the recommendations of the certified. soil tester so that surface and. near surface groundwater water does not interfere with proper mound operation. Mound locations on lots 8 and 9 need to be worked out carefully since the east part . of lot 9 is not suitable for a mound. Soil application rates for those sites with A+0 conditions should be 0.2 gpd/ft^2 and linear loading rates should be no more than 4.5 gpd/ft. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. 1_ . oy~-- sky-'Flea er-Spy ltst cc: _ oustY . Plumber L'ansk ❑ y@commerce.state.wi.us s E-mail CST ❑ Owner 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax ❑ Other J= i _I 4 a~ L. _ i I rrmrrmrrrl ~ ~ ' og >w FA N N Z N m DO D O' mc, CQ` m m r B B ig I Go I =121 -1i -I I I i M ~ ~iNYY 1 I wxc y 5 J ~ ~ c F3 lyi I xi y F ~ RS I-'n$ i:~~ MI ~ T i I ~I a x - W I u v ~e.wecwonewinEO m v $ - ' x ea Y Y v 0 a L~ El p e U a x M I I v FL z~ 4 a m o i ~ m Nz 68 m R~ B B ~ I 1 , vsuw I I 7~$ 1 I Irl I I I I 1 1 If 11 E cod \ ~i ~.i j i ~ y I I I I 1 I 1 pp'7 I gl, ael0on *wssES ~e r oc. 9ry, I ~ 8 I II '-I I I 1 °I I I I I r-- ~J 1 I ~ ~ I ~E i t rll 1 1 a I I e.v w' I a I r-'-----~ l.. T i 1 -1 ~ J I~• I I I , ~s{J I I I r 1 tl ' ~S i I I I 1y49rv II O I I 1 I I a A 1 1 1 I II 1 I 1 I I II ~ ~I I - I I I I ~ I tl - x 1 I IS _ I I [F ~ I I ~ I 11 ~ 1 I - I I S I I O I 11 ' ~ ~1 I I ~ a I I A < I I ~ I 11 / 1 I , y 1 1 V 11 _ 1 I - I II ' I 1 1 I . e~wEOruwE.,E I 1 1 I I I I I f , I I I l i l e~ I 3 ° . 1 I ^ a~ ieF 88