Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-1177-70-000 C 10 �K1J1tfAl�.0 D ANALYSIS Data ColUction/AnaIysis Would theludet Initial Data C,/ Computer/Property I.D. # © ` 0 / d Owner's Mine Property Address 'Zoning District A2 AO AR RES 'COM IND Past Zoning A2 AG AR RES COM : IND Overlay District NONE SHORELAND WETLAND FLOODPLAIN RIVERWAY Location — Section, Town, Range, Lo a. 1:1? F•.� Acre N r✓ NVV T Request Date__2 9 Disposition DENTE APPROVED RAWN POSTPONED Date " a — y Activity Rezoning ariance eeial Exception D � Type of Variance/Speeial Exception OAD/HWY. SETBAC WATER SETBACK BLUFFLINE SETBACK LOT RATIO DRIVEWAY SEPARATION NONCONFORMING LOT SIZE Ordinance Citation-- ` b� C Supporting Evidence Description—� PLOT MAP/PLAN SITE PLAN TOWN APPROVAL LTR CSM PHOT MAP SOIL TEST Hardship YE NO Linked to Rezoning YES Q:t Conditions EXPIRATION DATE COMPLETION ACCORDING TO PLAN ALL PERMITS COMPLETE ZONING OFFICE ACCESS &NOTMICATION UPON COMPLETION EROSION CONTROL Objections YES DECISION OF ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Case No: 19-91 Filing Date: 3-29-91 Notice Dates: Weeks of Apr. 8 & 15, 1991 C C r--.., Hearing Date: Apr. 25, 1991 FINDINGS OF FACT Having heard the testimony and considered the evidence presented, the Board find the following facts: 1. The applicant or appellant is: David & Ann Roe 3216 Random Rd. Eagen, MN 55121 2 . The applicant or appellant is the owner of the following described property which is the subject of the application or appeal: NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Town of Troy, St. Croix Co. 3 . The property is presently used for: Residential 4. The applicant or appellant proposes: Construct a residence 15' closer to the township road. 5. The applicant or appellant requests: Variance a. An appeal of the Zoning Administrator's determination. b. A special exception permit. * c. A variance Under section 17.64(1)2 of the ordinance. 6. The features of the proposed construction and property which relate to the grant or denial of the application or appeal are: The area where the requested variance should be granted is the only area that does not exceed the 12% slopes. CONCLUSION OF LAW Based on the above finding of fact the Board concludes that: 1 - w VARIANCE - The variance must meet all three of the following tests: A. Unnecessary hardship is present in that a literal enforcement of the terms of the zoning ordinance would not deny the applicant all reasonable use of the property because the existing residence provides reasonable use of family living on the property. B. The hardship is not due to physical limitation of the property rather than the circumstances of the appellant. C. The variance will not be contrary to the public interest as expressed by the objectives of the ordinance. ORDER AND DETERMINATION The basis of the above finding of fact, conclusions of law and the record in this matter the board orders: VARIANCE/SPECIAL EXCEPTION - The requested variance is granted subject to the following conditions: 1) Residence be constructed as requested by plans. Motion to by Stephens, seconded by Menter. Motion carried. Vote: Stephens, yes; Menter, yes; Sinclear, yes; Kinney, yes and Bradley, yes. ****************************************************************** The Zoning Administrator is directed to issue a zoning permit incorporating these conditions. Any privilege granted by this decision must be exercised within 12 months of the date of this decision by obtaining the necessary building, zoning and other permits for the proposed construction. This period will be extended if this decision is stayed by the order of any court or operation of law. This order may be revoked by the Board after notice and opportunity to be heard for violation of any of the conditions imposed. ***************************************************************** This decision may be appealed by filing an action in certiori in the circuit court for this county within 30 days after the date of filing of the decision. The municipality assumes no liability for and make no warranty as to the reliance on this decision if construction is commenced prior to expiration of this 30 day period. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS/ADJUSTMENT Date:— 5 —c23- �! Signed Filed:-5-23-91 Chairpers cc: Town Clerk and file p` 2 O ®144 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING (This meeting was recorded by a court reporter) Aprilg20, 1992 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kinney at 9:00 A.M. Chairman Kinney explained the procedures of the hearing requesting that individuals wishing to testify sign their names and addresses the front of the room. Supervisors Bradley, Kinney, Menter, Sinclear and Stephens were all in attendance. Staff present was Tom Nelson, Zoning administrator. Stephens made a motion to approve the amended agenda. Articles 1 and 7 of the new business have been omitted as has number 3 of the old business. Seconded by Bradley. Motion carried. Kinney made a motion to approve the minutes as written. . Motion seconded by Sinclear. Motion carried. OLD BUSINESS ,VID,AO lave requested an extension of his project as had been approved last year. The setback variance was good for a one year period. His plans are to build this summer. AMES CONSTRUCTION Greg Paronto presented a request to operate a nonmetallic operation for removal of clay on 20 acres of property. The amount to be removed would be approximately 25,000 cubic yards. No lab tests have been conducted on the quality of the clay and it is unknown as to when the operation will begin since there is no market at this time. Nelson stated there is the need for more information in the operations plan and reclamation plan. Proof of insurance and bonding are also required. BACHMAN Steve Dunlap presented additional information for the addition onto an existin g residence ce that is closer than 100' from the bluffline. n The projected cost is less than 50 percent of the current value of the structure. The township of Troy supports the proposal while DNR does not. NEW BUSINESS The meeting was called to order at 9: 30 A.M. Nelson read the i I notice of the hearing as published: The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public hearing for Monday, April 20, 1992 at 9: 30 A.M. in the County Board Room of the St. Croix County Courthouse, Hudson, Wisconsin to consider .the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An onsite investigation will be made of each site in question, after which the board contemplates adjournment into closed session for the purpose of deliberating on the appeals, pursuant to Sec. 19.85(1) (a) , Wisconsin Statutes, and will reconvene into open session for the purpose of voting on the appeals. 1. ARTICLE: 17 . 36(4)2(d) Bluffline Setback APPELLANT: Richard and Carl J. Vasatka LOCATION: Gov't Lot 1 of Sec. 25, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy 2. ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (c) Road Setback APPELLANT: Timothy E. Tuma LOCATION: SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 5, T29N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph 3 . ARTICLE: 17 .15 Sign APPELLANT: Burkhardt Cooperative Association LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 15, T29N-R19W, Town of Hudson and NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 10, T29N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph 4. ARTICLE: 17. 36(5)2(d) Bluffline Setback APPELLANT: Glen and Carla Webster LOCATION: Gov't Lot 1 , Sec. 35, T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph 5. ARTICLE: 17.64(5)3 Driveway Separation APPELLANT: Charles & Sonja McGill LOCATION: SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec., 6, T28N-R19W, Town of Troy 6. ARTICLE: 17.15(6) (a) Duplex APPELLANT: Donald Peters LOCATION: SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 27, T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph 7. ARTICLE: 17.18(1) (r) Bait Shop APPELLANT: Bradley K. Janshen LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 5, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset TIMOTHY TUMA Tim requested a variance of 17 feet from the town road to build a garage. The topography of the land does not allow for the proper setback. The township of St. Joseph supports the proposal. BURKHARDT COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION Joe Morales presented a request to place a larger sign on property that already has a sign. Because of a reorganization in the corporation the sign itself will be different also. Discussion on the implications of this location on future county road expansion. The township h t n hi of St. Joseph has not made a recommendation as of this p p m date. GLEN & CARLA WEBSTER Hugh Gwin, representing the Websters, presented a request to add a garage onto the existing residence. The addition would be within 14' of the bluffline and on the right-of-way line of STH 35. The existing garage would be converted into more livable space. The township of St. Joseph supported the proposal while DNR and MnWi Boundary Area Commission were opposed to the request. Discussion on whether this was a convenience or a true hardship. CHARLES & SONJA MCGILL Charles presented a request for a variance to a driveway separation on Tower Road, township of Troy. This request had been approved on this property before except with a different owner. The township supports the request because it is the only safe access point. DONALD PETERS Don presented a request for an after the fact permit on a duplex. His lending agency had requested the Zoning Office to conduct a compliancy inspection when it was determined he was in violation of the ordinance. The township of St. Joseph supports the proposal. Following the hearing the Board of Adjustment Committee visited each property. Upon returning, the following decisions were rendered: DAVID ROE Motion by Bradley, seconded by Menter to approve an extension of one additional year. Motion carried. AMES CONSTRUCTION Motion by Stephens, seconded by Menter to postpone a decision until a more comprehensive plan can be submitted. Motion carried. BACHMAN Motion by Stephens, seconded by Sinclear to postpone until DNR can be present to explain their reasoning for denial. Motion carried. TIM TUMA Motion by Bradley, seconded by Sinclear to approve the variance requested since a hardship exists. Motion carried. BURKHARDT COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION Motion by. Stephens, seconded by Sinclear to approve the proposed expansion might the need for road ex sign with the understanding P impact the location at a future date. Motion carri ed. GLEN & CARLA WEBSTER Motion by Stephens, seconded by Sinclear to deny the request for a setback variance. The request is for convenience not hardship. Other alternatives are available to accommodate their needs. Motion carried. CHARLES & SONJA MCGILL Motion by Bradley, seconded by Kinney to approve the driveway separation as requested. Motion carried. DON PETERS Motion by Bradley, seconded by Stephens to approve the special exception duplex. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Robert Stephens, ST ecreta y TCN:cj I � � I y o o o m o =a ~ c y C N 0 0 U .O-. oO o O1 C C y v p 7 N > ft C—w—w O > d C m w U N t0 t0 cu O c >w I-' N O 7 E N y p w O �'3='.o E > v° ° 0'05-9 m u, o CL N c 0 LL Of w r- N O M64 T d N O O C p C U O O op c c ac IL C p Y O O 0 w.2 O Q .0 p N _ 3 v E y ¢ in.5 ni Ii I M � w E N O r H W c C7 O Z c d Z C c N H 91 E v � I N a) 5 LO CL c c (D to O o 0 •N N �+ O a A N N I U O o o avi ¢ 0 O zmz a°° zg I N M I > O d _ d x a a s Mn o a` v� M � ►`n- � :: �v X333 EL •►v -f a a a a >> 3 O N ! > N N to J U c rn rn Z 0 `O � v 0 III p M N - O d 0 2 (O O N O O E M M CO N f0 V o 3 O v o V H e °o _ n `o E O o N U d 0 0 0 Cf. o rn a� c c U a 0, o U r C > O O C N W n N 0 � ` N N y 7 N N M� N >; V o N Z Z C o L o E E t O � I I � I d € a ,.. a L: d r • d N V d r A 0 a '� 0 vii 0 _ r 9i� •s. le Iloo, -,00 looe / / a mr ,.t.1 r Parcel #: 040-1177-70-000 02/12/2010 PAGE 1 E 1 OF AM 1 1 Alt. Parcel M 13/24.28.20.695 040-TOWN OF TROY Current ❑X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner 0-ROE, DAVID E&ANN D DAVID E&ANN D ROE 297 COVE RD HUDSON WI 54016 Districts: SC=School SP=Special Property Address(es): '=Primary Type Dist# Description *297 COVE RD SC 2611 HUDSON SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 2.900 Plat: 03-065-ST CROIX COVE 2ND&3RD SECS 13&24 T28N R20W LOT 38 ST CROIX Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 38 COVE SUB-DIVISION#3 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4) Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc# Vol/Page Type 07/23/1997 992/402 WD 07/23/1997 906/55 07/23/1997 905/239 2009 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 33748 467,700 Valuations: Last Changed: 11/09/2009 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 2.900 109,000 350,100 459,100 NO 10 Totals for 2009: General Property 2.900 109,000 350,100 459,100 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2008: General Property 2.900 85,000 396,200 481,200 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 1 Certification Date: Batch M 120 Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00