HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-2064-90-000 (2) ti•
ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING OFFICE
1101 CARMICHAEL ROAD
HUDSON, WI 54016
(715) 386-4680
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION
NO: FEE: $150. 00
DATE:
APPLICANT OR AGENT• John and Diane Erickson
ADDRESS: 1258 Hwy 35 N PHONE: (715) 549-6878
OWNER• John and Diane Erickson
ADDRESS• S von
��o-r nom-- =- W-1 (o
LEGAL DESCR{PTION: LOT SUBDIVISION:
P� &00 L-0 ',1 4, ,, SEC. 35 T 30 N-R 20 W, TOWN OF St- Joseph
PARCEL NO: (TAX ID) 030-2064-90
VARIANCE X SPECIAL EXCEPTION
This property is currently used for Homestead of the parties
and has been used continuously since 1974
SPECIAL EXCEPTION
NOTE: Special exception use permits are granted in the discretion
of the Board of Adjustment Committee. They are made available to
validate uses which, while not approved within the zoning district
in question, are deemed to be compatible with approved uses and/or
not found to be hazardous, harmful, offensive or otherwise adverse
to other uses, subject to review by the circumstances and the
imposition of conditions, subject to the provisions of the St.
Croix County Zoning Ordinance.
If it is your belief that a special exception use permit should be
granted to you for the above-described property, please set forth,
in detail, the intended use of the property and your justification
in applying for such a permit:
VARIANCE
NOTE: Variances from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be
applied for only where, owing to special conditions, a literal
enforcement of the Ordinance will result in an "unnecessary
hardship" which is defined, in the Zoning Ordinance as meaning "an
unusual or extreme decrease in the adaptability of the property to
the uses permitted by the zoning district, which is caused by
facts, such as rough terrain or good soil conditions, uniquely
applicable to the particular piece of property in the same zoning
district. " If you believe that under the facts and circumstances
unique to your property a variance could be granted to you, under
the definition cited above, please set forth the type, of variance
which you are requesting and the reasons that you have for making
the request.
See attached Exhibit A
OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES:
THE APPLICANT, AS WITNESSED BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,
HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE HAS READ AND THAT HE UNDERSTANDS THE
FOLLOWING:
1) Applicant must go to Township for approval and have Township
send letter to the Zoning Office stating their position on
your request.
2) Applicants must submit a site plan showing distances from
property lines, roads, and/or water.
3) Applicants are to submit a list of adjoining property owners
and their addresses, including those directly across the road.
4) Applicants will be heard by the Board of Adjustment Committee.
After a public hearing on the application, at which time
testimony and arguments will be received, the Committee will
adjourn to view the sites in question after which time they
will reconvene to render decisions. However, the applicant
should not consider the decision to be final until written
notice of the decision has been presented to him.
5) At the public hearing, the applicant may appear in person or
through an agent or an attorney of his choice. The applicant/
agent/attorney may present testimony and evidence and
arguments in support of his application.
6) The fact that an application for a permit has been filed does
not automatically mean that a permit is granted. If you are
uncertain as to how to present your case, you may want to
consider the advice of legal counsel.
7) The fee assessed for this application is non-refundable.
8) All site plans, pictures, etc. become property of the Zoning
Office and will remain in your file.
9) Statements of representatives of the Board of Adjustment made
to you concerning matters of whether the committee can, will,
or will not grant the permits you seek are understood to
constitute the opinions of those representatives. Staff are
not empowered to act on behalf or instead of the Board of
Adjustment Committee.
10) Applications must be returned to the Zoning Office by the end
of the month prior to the month of the next regular meeting.
Board of Adjustment meetings are held the fourth Thursday of each
month. Any assistance in the filling out of this application will
be provide o you by a representative of the St. Croix County
Zoning fic yo q St.
SIGNED. DATE: !�
Appl ' ant/A e t
46
O ner
The section below is to be completed by the Zoning Office.
A Variance/Special Exception use permit is requested as authorized
by Section
4••
..7m,
cp
1l z z
LA r C
m N �•d.d I •
m •°c�� I�
� lip
I
' � 1
t '
I `
I / I
0 LA
\ 1 I I
I U
V \ \ to
' ' N
O � � �01
1 \
am z
+ `^ �
o •, c
l r . .,
I o Y
P O ♦/ I. � O s N D Z!
I N
i O Q7
' D rntA '01 011 I -•aE �( in SCA 2 b`
Z ° �-Gi ; ' rnrn A i
l I i r D c III �'I C v
r,-rj �►
rq
N CO
r O(yN NON _IQ 4 ! � � X
V rn II �!
n [ n O N , 1 r•1
CX -u !
C G O N J
(3 PO 1 ! C`Q� Nulr
n
o N 6� 0�
I �
In f \
o A a '
\\\
P.C.♦ Sb 01 °m
El. .44 (A \
/ ;o \��
g o.
H mru
AcJy `, MoD
Az•
N-n (II(l�rpl r UO
Io O 2 pON = III, \� pC+
r _ GJ m-�1
o + +
W ri)— O pJj0 •1
.N Dpp a f� z
.6 10001 rn O !
z r � /
W
N E
m z
N
m
n
p.
X b tOp i k
if
co
b
CIL,
a
� r
rnn i /
a �
ti
x x�A
f �
c at ,
d
a
ODN11W
cP
Parcel #: 030-2064-90-000 12/1612008 08:19 AM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel#: 35.30.20.605D 030-TOWN OF SAINT JOSEPH
Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
O- ERICKSON, JOHN A
JOHN A ERICKSON
PO BOX 945
HUDSON WI 54016
Districts: SC= School SP=Special Property Address(es): '=Primary
Type Dist# Description ' 1258 HWY 35
SC 2611 HUDSON
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 2.500 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 35 T30N R20W PT GL 1 W 152.95 FT OF Block/Condo Bldg:
E 726.5 FT LYING SLY OF HWY 35& INC .03
A DESC IN 580/231 ALSO PARCEL DESC AS Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4)
COM NW COR SEC 35; TH S 1 DEG E 781.11' 35-30N-20W
TH S 51 DEG E 979.80'ALG SWLY R/O/W LN,
& NWLY EXTEN-SION THEREOF, OF SWLY
more
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
11/18/1997 568687 1277/387 QC
07/23/1997 961/360
2008 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
273647 683,800
Valuations: Last Changed: 07/09/2004
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 2.500 299,600 288,300 587,900 NO
Totals for 2008:
General Property 2.500 299,600 288,300 587,900
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2007:
General Property 2.500 299,600 288,300 587,900
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 1 Certification Date: Batch#: 210
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
ST. CROIX COUNTY
WISCONSIN
OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL
ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
,^;; :: NNNDMNMUN NMMAY
- 1101 Carmichael Road
•`' - Hudson, WI 54016-7710
(715) 381-4315 FAX (715) 381-4301
MEMO
TO: Board of Adjustment Members
Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator
FROM: Greg Timmerman, Corporation Counsel il',r ,
DATE: December 8, 1995
RE: John Erickson Y. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has upheld the Board of Adjustment decision which denied
John Erickson a variance to construct a storage shed and remodel his residence. I have
enclosed a copy of the decision.
The Court agreed that Mr. Erickson's hardship was self-created, not a hardship caused by
his property.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
GAT/kas
Enclosure
COURT OF APPEALS
DECISION
DATED AND RFj-EASED
NOTICE
DECEMBER 5, 1995
A earty may We with dw Sup Court a Ybia maoa is aub,�eot b fu dwr editing. If
pd�oa b review as adverse de Wwa by the pub4ahed the ofWW version w�iU appear in
Court of Ssa i SM-10 and the bouadvoiume of d,Ormial itepats.
RULE ItWA t RATI
No. 95-1608
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT III
JOHN ERICKSON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
V.
ST. CROIX COUNTY
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,
Respondent-Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County:
ERIC J. LUNDELL, Judge. 4 ffiimied.
Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.
PER CURIAM. John Erickson appeals a judgment affirming the St.
Croix County Board of Adjustment's denial of his request for a variance to allow him
i.
No. 95.1606
to construct a storage shed and remodel the residence on his property. Because
Erickson failed to prove a hardship justifying a variance, we affirm the judgment.
Erickson bought a small home on the St. Croix River when he was
single. After marrying and having three children, he sought a zoning variance in
order to enlarge his house and construct a storage shed. The board denied the
variance, concluding the literal enforcement of the zoning code would not result in
a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship.
S
Judicial review of the board's decision is limited to: (1) whether the
board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it proceeded on a correct theory of law;
(3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its
will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might
reasonably make the order or determination in question. See State ex rel. Brookside
Y. Jefferson Bd., 131 Wis.2d 101, 120, 388 N.W.2d 593, 600-01 (1986). The
board's findings may not be disturbed and its decision is presumed correct and valid
if any reasonable view of the evidence supports the findings. Snyder Y. Waukesha
County Zoning Bd., 74 Wis.2d 468, 476, 247 N.W.2d 98, 103 (1976).
A property owner is entitled to a variance only upon a showing of
unnecessary hardship. M. at 472, 247 N.W.2d at 102. Unnecessary hardship exists
when compliance with the strict letter of the zoning restrictions would unreasonably
-2-
No. 95-1609
prevent the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or would render
conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome. See Arndorler Y. Board l
of A¢jusltnent, 162 Wis.2d 246, 2S5, 469 N.W.2d 831, 834 (1991). Unnecessary
hardship relates to a unique condition affecting the owner's land. It does not include
a condition personal to the owner of the land, mere inconvenience or a self-created
problem. Snyder, 74 Wis.2d at 476-79, 247 N.W.2d at 103-04. Unnecessary
hardship can best be defined in a situation where, in the absence of a variance, no
feasible use can be made of the land. The purpose of the variance is to prevent the
land from being rendered useless. Id. at 474, 247 Wis.2d at 102.
The board could reasonably conclude that Erickson failed to establish
a hardship as that term is defined in Snyder. The evidence shows that Erick son's
inconvenience is not related to the property, but rather to himself because of his
enlarged family. A showing of natural growth of a family and personal inconvenience
does not constitute sufficient practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to justify a
variance. Id. at 478, 247 N.W.2d at 103-04. Erickson established a need to expand
a bathroom to install a whirlpool because of his wife's headaches. This is also a
condition personal to the owner of the land, and not to the land itself. It is not the
uniqueness of the owner's plight, but the uniqueness of the land causing the plight that
justifies a variance. See 8 McQ[niuN, MumciPni.CORPORATIONS § 25.167 at 544
(3d ed. 1965). Erickson presented no evidence that the property could not be used
-3-
No. 95-1608
for a permitted purpose or that conformity with the zoning restrictions were
unnecessarily burdensome. Therefore, because Erickson failed to meet his burden of
establishing an unnecessary hardship, the board's decision was not arbitrary or
unreasonable.
By the Court.—Judgment affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATs.
-4-
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Martin LeVake/Levque Towers
Nelson indicated that they are still waiting for a State permit.
He has been told that the permit has arrived but stated he has not
seen it yet.
Charles LeVake, Jr. , being duly sworn, stated he is a
representative on behalf of Levque Towers.
Introduced as Exhibit #1 were 2 pages from the Department of
Industry, Labor and Human Relations showing approval of the tower;
Exhibit #2 , copy of a letter from the Federal Aviation
Administration; Exhibit #3 , complete plan packet submitted to DILHR
dated 3/3/95; Exhibit #4 , site plan of the property; Exhibit #5,
plan for a small building, being 20' x 10' x 8' tall. This would
be in addition to the building that is already there.
Charles LeVake indicated that there would be strobe lighting during
the day and a red light at night. There is no backup power at this
time. LeVake indicated that they are going to St. Joseph Township
tonight for approval on the building. Today is only for the tower.
Chairman Bradley indicated that he is inclined not to approve the
matter in full with St. Joseph's approval later. The building has
to be included with the special exception use as an accessory to
this use.
Mehls asked LeVake what would happen if the power goes down and
there is a need for backup power. Martin LeVake, previously sworn,
indicated that there is backup power there now in the form of a
battery pack, which will be hooked up. He indicated that this was
stated by him in previous testimony. Mehls indicated his concern
for helicopters and on-site landing areas for helicopters. LeVake
stated they can provide the battery pack and are considering the
light cell power as their main power. It would be the emergency
power that they need. He indicated that he is also concerned for
the need of power. He has over 5, 000 people hooked up to the
paging systems. He believes they are providing a viable service to
this County.
Chairman Bradley indicated that the Board will see the applicant
back next month.
At this time Chairman Bradley made an announcement that the
application for the amphitheater was postponed yesterday by the
applicant and stated it would be heard on the June 22 , 1995.
Gary Sukowatey
Nelson indicated that there has been concern expressed from two of
the neighbors. A little background on this case. This was a
request for a special exception use for a body shop/automotive
repair. The Board of Adjustment granted approval with conditions.
Conditions of the decision were fencing, that the Zoning Office
have access to the property, no painting or sand blasting was to be
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
St. Croix County Government Center, Hudson, Wisconsin
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter. )
Thursday, May 25, 1995
The meeting was called to order by Chairman John Bradley at 9:05
a.m. A role call was made. All members were present.
Filipiak made a motion to approve the amended agenda, seconded by
Mehls. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Neumann to approve the minutes as mailed,
seconded by Filipiak. Motion carried.
Thursday, June 22, 1995 will be the date of the next meeting.
Vice Chair Vacancy:
Chairman Bradley indicated that Vice Chairman Dorsey has resigned
due to chairing the steering committee as well as the Planning and
Development Committee. Nominations for Vice Chairman were as
follows: Mehls nominated Neumann. Neumann nominated Filipiak.
Nominations were closed. Voting was done by closed ballots. The
nomination was 3 to 1 in favor of Tim Filipiak. Bradley indicated
that the Administrative Committee is reviewing the vacancy of this
Board and will be advising the Board of their decision.
REVIEW OF PREVIOUS MINUTES:
John Erickson
Bradley indicated that all Board members received a copy of the
Circuit Court Decision on the matter finding in favor of the Board
of Adjustment's decision. The Judge was not particularly happy,
but felt the applicant's self-induced hardship was a valid reason
to deny the application. The State of Minnesota is less protective
than the State of Wisconsin. Our prerogative is to be protective
of that bluffline.
Nelson indicated that Erickson's application was for constructing
a storage shed and remodeling the residence. The Board was not
arbitrary. The petitioner did not suffer any hardship. The
hardship was not established but instead it was a personal
inconvenience. The growth of the family is a personal condition to
the owner of the land. Nelson stated he is pleased with the
Decision.
Asphalt Associates
Bradley indicated that he thought that the ownership of the
property had to be established by May of 1995. Nelson indicated
that there are problems with the estate. The land has not been
transferred yet. They could put this matter on for next month's
hearing. The applicants are to be formally notified.
understand the situation.
Gerald Olsen
Mehls brought to the attention of the Board that there has been
some concern regarding mini storage units and security lighting.
It has not been done at this site. Another unit is being
constructed at this time. Nelson indicated that this matter would
be brought to the attention of the applicant.
NEW BUSINESS:
The hearing was called to order by Chairman Bradley. Nelson read
the notice of the hearing as published:
PUBLIC HEARING
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public
hearing for Thursday, May 25, 1995 at 9: 30 a.m. at the Government
Center, 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin, to consider the
following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on-
site investigation will be made of each site in question, after
which the Board will return for the purpose of deliberating and
voting on the appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17 . 18 (1) (r) Commercial Masonry Products
APPELLANT: County Concrete Corporation
LOCATION: NW, , NW, , Sections 33 and 34 , T29N-R18W, Town of
Warren
2 . ARTICLE: 17. 64 (1) (d) 2 Setback from a Class D Road
APPELLANT: Karen J. Palmer
LOCATION: SW, , NW', , Section 6, T28N-R18W, Town of
Kinnickinnic
3 . ARTICLE: 17. 64 (5) 3 Driveway Separation on a Class D Road
APPELLANT: Gary S. Doubek
LOCATION: NE; , NE; , Section 7, T28N-R19W, Town of Troy
4 . ARTICLE: 17 . 64 (1) (d) 2 Setback from a Class D Road
APPELLANT: David O. Hake
LOCATION: NE; , SE;, Section 21, T28N-R18W, Town of
Kinnickinnic
5. ARTICLE: 17 . 15 (n) Temporary Hot. Mix Plant
APPELLANT: Mathy Construction Company/LeRoy Carey
LOCATION: SW, , SW; , Section 19, T28N-R16W, Town of Eau Galle
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and be
heard. Additional information may be obtained from the office of
the St. Croix County Zoning Administrator, Hudson, Wisconsin at
715/386-4680.
John Bradley, Chairman
St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
done outside and the structure was to be completed by June of 1994 .
The decision was appealed. There have been complaints regarding
painting and sand blasting outside the building, the visibility of
the lot area, the feeble attempt to put up screening, i.e. a chain
link fence with lathe, the number of junk vehicles, miscellaneous
junk. The Zoning Office took an inventory of the junk out there
and sent Mr. Sukowatey a certified letter. Once the deadline runs,
Corporation Counsel's office will proceed with a suit on the junk
yard matter. They cannot do anything on the use, just the junk
yard.
Chairman Bradley stated that the building has not been completed,
There are tires out there. The County made an effort to collect
junk tires. Nelson indicated that he talked to Sukowatey about
those tires and Sukowatey indicated that those tires are for tire
sales. He claims they are usable tires. A motor vehicle is junk
that is not registered and not operable. A certified letter was
sent to this regard. Corporation Counsel is ready to prosecute on
the junk yard matter. The appeal is being handled by Greg
Timmerman. The DNR is aware of them painting. They are the ones
to uphold the paint booth. Mehls stated that the fencing/screening
is part of the appeal as well as the planting process. Filipiak
inquired as to the fill in the wetland. Nelson indicated that the
grading is on the very edge of it only. The excavator called
Nelson before going on the site.
Chairman Bradley asked that this matter be placed on the agenda
next month to keep the Board apprised. He indicated he would also
like Greg Timmerman to give them an update on the appeal at that
time.
Orrin Summers
It was noted by Chairman Bradley that he would like the Summer's
property continually observed for good documentation if in fact a
revocation hearing would take place.
Nelson indicated that he went out there Monday and chased parked
cars. There were 19 cars out there, which he took photographs of.
Nelson stated he didn't see any screening. The residence on this
property is being rented out by somebody else at this time.
Bylaws
Chairman Bradley indicated that they would postpone this matter to
a later date.
OLD BUSINESS:
Todd Featherstone
Nelson indicated that they received the Decision on the
Featherstone appeal. The Board of Adjustment Decision was upheld.
It was noted at this hearing that from here on in anytime a case is
taken to Court a filing fee must be submitted by the Zoning Office.
Nelson stated that the Zoning Office is not budgeted for this. He
has had an opportunity to talk to Krizek and Loney and they
Karen J. Palmer, being duly sworn, stated that she has owned this
property for 15 years and 8 months. The house was 2 years old when
they bought it. The garage is run down and dilapidated. This is
a double garage, 23 ' x 231 . The new one will be 26' x 271 . They
will be no closer to the road. They will be putting in a concrete
floor. They have good visibility for both accesses. The yard
slopes towards 90th Street. Marked on Exhibit #1 as LP was the
propane tank, which could be moved. Karen Palmer indicated that
she would like to put a deck on the front side of the house which
would wrap around the corner of the house. Labeled on Exhibit #1
were the 3 entrances on the house, 2 service doors and 1 patio
door. The overhang on the house is 2 feet. The Board inquired of
Ms. Palmer as to whether or not they could reduce the wrap around
deck on the southeast side of the house. Identified on Exhibit #1
as "B" was the well.
Chairman Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and
render a decision later this date.
Gary Doubek
Nelson indicated that this is a request for a variance for a
driveway separation on a Class D road. This is an after-the-fact
application. The driveway was cited with a violation. The Deputy
Zoning Administrator who issues driveway permits for the township
issued this in error. It doesn't meet the 200 foot separation.
Introduced as Exhibit #1 was a site plan; Exhibit #2 , letter from
Charlie Ahlf who supports this application. Nelson indicated that
he didn't receive anything in writing from the township but that he
did talk to the Clerk who gave the decision over the phone. Dave
Hense, however, is here from the Town of Troy.
Dave Hense, being duly sworn, stated that he is a Town of Troy
Supervisor. Hense stated that the applicant put the driveway in in
good faith. For safety reasons if the driveway was moved to the
east it would put it directly across from another driveway on a
tight curve. There is a problem with snow removal in the
wintertime. The plow has to stop. Also, the school bus stops
right on the curve. Hense stated he believes a 200 foot separation
would be worse than where the driveway is at now. The township
recommended approval of this variance. A mistake was made, not at
the fault of the applicant. The main issue here is safety.
Nelson indicated that the Zoning Office cited the homeowner. The
permit which was granted was not a legal permit. The citation will
be removed if the variance is approved. Doubek lives on the south
side of Red Brick Road.
Gary Doubek, being duly sworn, stated that he owns 3 acres. He has
owned the property for about a year. He put in a driveway in the
process of working on a house which has not been completed yet.
Doubek stated that a CSM was filed on 5/25/94 . On 12/14/94 Mary
Jenkins from the Zoning Office sent him a letter stating that he
was in violation. He got another letter from Mary Jenkins on
3/6/95. He contacted the Zoning office and was told to apply for
Chairman Bradley introduced the other members of the Board as being
Charles Mehls, Jerry Neumann and Tim Filipiak. Tom Nelson, Zoning
Administrator, was present to assist the Board with the
introduction of the materials as well as recommendations as to how
the ordinances applied. On call was the St. Croix County
Corporation Counsel's Office.
Chairman Bradley explained the procedures of the hearing requesting
that individuals wishing to testify sign their name in the front of
the room on the sign up sheet provided.
County Concrete Corporation
Nelson indicated that this is an application for commercial masonry
products. They wish to increase their storage yard and expand the
building. Introduced as Exhibit #1 is a copy of a site plan and a
copy of their building plans for the new addition.
Dan Raebel, being duly sworn, stated that he is a representative of
County Concrete. The business is prospering. They need more
space. They presented their plans to the township. The township
stated they were going to send their town minutes in to the Zoning
Office. Introduced as Exhibit #2 was a copy of the plans. Raebel
indicated that the township requested that they have an all block
building with rock face block. This will be used for cold storage
only, i.e. bag goods, mortars, fire place units (metal boxes) . If
the State requests additional bathrooms, they will abide by their
request. There is a fence line on the east and south sides and
hurricane fence on the east side, which has not been completed.
They have a bank there that they are trying to get some type of
growth on. They are concerned with the water runoff with this
property. The pitch of the roof will go north to run off in a
green area. This will be a steel structured building. The height
of the building will be 18 to 21 feet high. There is approximately
5 acres there.
It was inquired by Mehls as to whether or not the concrete business
had any hazardous materials. Raebel stated that they have a list
of products which are on file with the local fire department. They
only keep small amounts of cleaning chemicals on the site.
Chairman Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and
render a decision later this date.
Karen J. Palmer
Nelson indicated that this is a request for a variance for a
setback off of a Class D road. Introduced as Exhibit #1 was a site
plan identifying the location of the existing house, which meets
the setback requirement off of 90th Street. This is a request for
a garage to be located 77 feet from the center of 90th Street. The
Board will also be considering the deck issue. There is a septic
system and an in ground pool in the back of the house. Introduced
as Exhibit #2 is a letter from the Town of Kinnickinnic
recommending approval of this application.
corner of the garage would be.
Chairman Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and
render a decision later this date.
Mathy Construction Company/LeRoy Carey
Nelson indicated that this is a request for a special exception use
for a temporary hot mix plant. Introduced as Exhibit #1 was a site
plan identifying the location of the asphalt plant which is an
existing non-metallic mining site; Exhibit #2, brief facility plan
identifying the need for this particular use for a hot mix plant
for a State, County or Town project. This project would be State
Highway 72 . Hours of operation indicate 6: 30 a.m. to 7: 00 p.m.
Monday through Saturday with 9 to 11 trucks. Eight neighbors and
the owner of this property were notified by letter. Nothing has
been received from the Town of Eau Galle.
Perry Aderholt, being duly sworn, stated that he is the agent for
Mathy Construction. He indicated that they applied for this permit
as their last permit is almost up. It expires this week. They
intend to be there another two weeks. Clean up will be completed.
The non-metallic mining application will continue through the
period of its permit. Nelson indicated that this permit is limited
to 120 days. Aderholt stated they are running out of days. He
stated that St. Croix County will be performing work in the Town of
Forest in mid July.
Chairman Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and
render a decision later this date.
DECISIONS
Having completed the hearing testimony, the Board visited each site
in question. Upon completion, the following decisions were
rendered:
County Concrete Corporation
Motion by Bradley, seconded by Mehls to approve the request of the
applicant for expansion of the applicant's commercial masonry
products pending State approvals on all permits with the following
conditions: Green run off areas are to be improved; a SERA site
inspection is to be conducted for hazardous material ; State
approval of the building is to be obtained; the Zoning Office is to
be notified upon completion of this project. The following vote
was taken: Bradley, yes; Filipiak, yes; Neumann, yes; Mehls, yes.
Motion carried.
Karen J. Palmer
The decision for Karen J. Palmer is postponed until the applicant
has replaced her failing septic system. Upon completion of said
septic system, this matter will again be presented to the Board.
a variance. He went before the township who approved it.
Introduced as Exhibit #3 was a series of 4 photographs. Doubek
indicated that his driveway was a field access. Nelson indicated
that the problem is that the field access is nonconforming. This
needs to be brought into conformity. Introduced as Exhibit #4 was
a petition from seven of Doubek's neighbors stating they have no
objection to this variance. Doubek stated that Mr. Ahlf was the
only person he didn't get a signature from, who sent in a letter.
He indicated that he built this driveway in good faith. He
believes if he has to move the driveway 200 feet that it would pose
a safety risk. He indicated that he has planted some shrubs which
he keeps trimmed. Dave Hense indicated that nothing is to be
planted any closer than 33 feet from the road. It was indicated by
one of the Board members that if this variance is approved maybe
the township could put up a curve sign there with a posted speed.
Hense indicated that he can check with the County Highway
Department to find out if they will issue a speed sign for this
curve. A recommendation was made by the Board that a letter be
sent to the Town of Troy Clerk recommending that the town road crew
get in touch with the Highway Department for a sign. This could be
made a condition of the decision.
Chairman Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and
render a decision later this date.
David O. Hake
Nelson indicated that this is a request for a setback off of a
Class D road, that being River Drive. Introduced as Exhibit #1
was a site plan showing a setback of 100 feet. The ordinance
requires 133 feet. The house meets the setback; Exhibit #2 ,
material list from Menards; Exhibit #3 , a series of 8 photographs;
Exhibit #4 , faxed letter from the Clerk of the Town of Kinnickinnic
recommending approval of this application.
David O. Hake, being duly sworn, stated that he has owned this
property almost 15 years. It is less than 2 acres, about 1.7
acres. This were originally all pine trees there. He tried to
save as many of the trees as he could. Where he originally planned
to put the shed was too close to the road, 35 to 40 trees would
have to be cut down. With his proposed shed being where he would
like it he can use his existing driveway. His well head is located
7 to 8 feet east of the present garage. The proposed garage would
be 24 ' x 281 , being 25 feet from the east boundary line. Indicated
on Exhibit #1 as "A" is where the septic system is located. This
is northerly from the house. The intended use of the building is
for storage. Hake indicated that he has a County vehicle which
sits outside. He keeps his equipment in the County vehicle, but
would prefer to keep it under lock and key. He indicated that he
is an Investigator for the St. Croix County Sheriff's Department.
He is also the director of the St. Croix Valley Drug Task Force and
is on ERU. If the garage were to be moved to the north he would
have to cut more trees down. Hake indicated that he originally
found out by accident that he was too close to the road. He stated
he has a green stake out there which denotes where the southwest
Gary S. Doubek
Motion by Filipiak, seconded by Bradley to approve the applicant's
request for an after-the-fact variance with the following
conditions: The shrubbery is to be moved back off of Red Brick
Drive 45 feet from the center of the road for safety and site
visibility; brushing is to be done by the Town of Troy; the Zoning
Office is to recommend to the township that a letter be sent to the
Highway Department to have them review the road for safety reasons.
The following vote was taken: Bradley, yes; Filipiak, yes;
Neumann, yes; Mehls, yes. Motion carried.
David O. Hake
Motion by Mehls, seconded by Bradley to approve the applicant's
request for a variance for a setback off of a Class D road with the
following vote: Bradley, yes; Filipiak, no; Neumann, no; Mehls,
yes. Motion denied.
Mathy Construction Company/LeRoy Carey
Motion by Bradley, seconded by Filipiak to approve the applicant's
request for a temporary hot mix plant with the conditions that
clean up be done, that the permit is good for 120 days only and
that they follow all required DNR permits and EPA air standards.
The following vote was taken: Bradley, yes; Filipiak, yes;
Neumann, yes; Mehls, yes. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted:
come umann, Secretary
mz
The proposed construction would not be visible from the St. Croix River. The Court sees
this issue as the critical issue in this and any similar case:' (Emphasis original.)
I concur with the Judge's concern. I believe a reexamination of the regulations is warranted.
I wanted to bring this decision to your attention so that you could consider the Judge's
request.
GAT/kas
Enclosure
cc Honorable Eric J. Lundell
ST. CROIX COUNTY
WISCONSIN
OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL
r r r M g r r N ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
rrrrr 1101 Carmichael Road
��• Hudson, WI 54016-7710
—
""� — (715) 381-4315 FAX (715) 381-4301
MEMO ►.
TO: Board of Adjustment Members: , '
John Bradley 99
Tom Dorsey STMx•
Jerome Neumann ,
Tim Filipiak It
Charles Mehls E
Planning and Development Committee Members:
Tom Dorsey
Bill Oemichen
Ron Raymond
Linda Luckey
George Menter
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Eau Claire
Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator
FROM: Greg Timmerman
DATE: May 11, 1995
RE: St. Croix Riverway District/St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Decision
Enclosed please find a copy of the Memorandum Decision dated May 8, 1995,in the matter
of John Erickson vs. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, written by the Honorable Eric
J. Lundell.
John Erickson requested variances from St. Croix County to construct a storage shed and
remodel his home on property located in the St. Croix Riverway District. The Board of
Adjustment denied the variance request on the basis that an unnecessary hardship was not
shown by Mr. Erickson. Judge Lundell affirmed the Board of Adjustment decision.
However,in language beginning at the bottom of page 4 of his decision, the Judge expresses
concern about the practicability of the law requiring Mr. Erickson's request to be denied.
He says in part, "The denial of petitioner's variance request is unfortunate in this particular
case because there is no showing of any negative effect on the St. Croix Riverway District.
State ex re. Brookside Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Jefferson Co. Bd. of
Adjust. , 131 Wis.2d 101, 120, 388 N.W.2d 593 (1986) . Petitioner
contends that the Board's decision was arbitrary, oppressive and
unreasonable, that the Board did not proceed on a correct theory of
law, and that the evidence was not such that the Board might
reasonably make the determination it did.
In reviewing decisions of the Board, courts are hesitant to
interfere with administrative determinations, and must accord the
decisions of the Board a presumption of correctness and validity.
Snyder v. Waukesha Co. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. , 74 Wis. 2d 468, 476,
247 N.W. 2d 98 (1976) . Thus, the Board's findings may not be
disturbed if any reasonable view of the evidence sustains them.
The Court may not substitute its discretion for that committed to
the Board by the legislature. Id.
Petitioner asserts that the Board's decision was arbitrary
because it found that petitioner did not suffer a hardship. A
Board's decision is arbitrary if it is unreasonable or without a
rational basis. Snyder, 74 Wis. 2d at 476.
A property owner is entitled to a variance only upon a showing
of unnecessary hardship. Id. at 472. Unnecessary hardship exists
when compliance with the strict letter of the zoning restrictions
would unreasonably prevent the owner from using the property for a
permitted purpose or would render conformity with such restrictions
unnecessarily burdensome. See Arndorfer v. Sauk Co. Bd. of
Adjust. , 154 Wis. 2d 333, 469 N.W. 2d 831 (Ct. App. 1990) . To be
entitled to a variance, the unnecessary hardship must relate to a
2
l
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT ST. CROIX COUNTY
'JOHN ERICKSON,
Petitioner,
V. MEMORANDUM DECISION
ST. CROIX COUNTY Case No. 94 CV 161
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,
Respondent.
Petitioner John Erickson requested variances from the
respondent St. Croix County Board of Adjustment (the Board) in
order to construct a storage shed and remodel his residence. In a
written decision dated April 14, 1994 , the Board denied the
petitioner's variance requests. The petitioner commenced this
action seeking review of the Board's decision.
The Court issued a Memorandum Decision on October 20, 1994,
however, in an order dated November 4, 1994 , the Court vacated that
Decision. In a hearing on January 19, 1995, the parties
participated in oral argument. However, the Court did not take in
new evidence, and therefore, the common-law certiorari standard of
review is applicable. Klinger v. Oneida Cty. , 149 Wis. 2d 838, 440
N.W.2d 348 (1989) .
Judicial review of the Board's decision is limited to: (1)
whether the Board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it
proceeded on a correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was
arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and
not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it
might reasonably make the order or determination in question.
f
1 ,
The petitioner also argues that the Board did not proceed on
a correct theory of law. The petitioner takes issue with the
Board's finding that the proposed construction would be in part on
slopes exceeding 12 degrees. The petitioner correctly points out
that the Board cannot deny a variance simply because the variance
constitutes a departure from the zoning ordinance. Schalow v.
Waupaca Co. , 139 Wis. 2d 284, 288, 407 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App. 1987) .
The petitioner's argument, however, takes the Board's finding in
isolation. The Board also determined that the petitioner had
failed to establish an unnecessary hardship which is a correct
basis for denying a variance request.
Petitioner's last argument is that the evidence was not such
that the Board might reasonably make the determination it did.
Petitioner asserts that the Board made errors in its finding of
facts. For instance, the Board found that the current residence is
approximately 3,740 square feet and that the proposed construction
would in part be on slopes in excess of 12 degrees. Although the
evidence may not support these specific findings, the evidence does
support the Board's finding that petitioner did not demonstrate
unnecessary hardship. Therefore, the evidence supports the Board's
denial of the variance requests.
Although the Court concludes and finds that the Board's
decision must be affirmed for the reasons stated above, comment
must be made.
The denial of petitioner's variance requests is unfortunate in
this particular case because there is no showing of any negative
4
r '
unique condition effecting the owner's land. Id. at 256.
Unnecessary hardship is not established where the owner shows only
'a personal inconvenience or a self-created problem. Snyder, 74
Wis. 2d at 474.
In its findings of facts, the Board found that:
A literal enforcement of the terms of the Zoning Code
would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the appellant because: A hardship has not
been demonstrated but rather this is a convenience. The
applicant has or can make reasonable use of the property.
The difficulties are not related to the property, but to
the property owner. The problems identified are self
imposed.
A review of the record reveals evidence to support the Board's
finding. Petitioner's need for a variance arose from the growth of
his family. As his family expanded, the amount of privacy,
storage, and living area decreased. The Wisconsin Supreme Court
has determined that a showing of natural growth of a family does
not constitute unnecessary hardship. Snyder, 74 Wis. 2d at 478.
The growth of a family and the need for more room to accommodate
the family is a condition personal to the owner of the land, not a
condition affecting the land. Additionally, the evidence shows
that the need for a whirlpool stems from the headaches which
petitioner's wife suffers. Again, this is a condition personal to
the owner of the land.
The Court realizes that the petitioner and his family are
suffering a hardship, but unfortunately the law does not recognize
this type of hardship as deserving of a variance. Therefore, the.
Court must conclude that the Board's decision has a rational basis
and is not arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable.
3
A
The Court suggests that the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources and St. Croix County develop some appropriate changes in
the St. Croix Riverway District regulations in order to permit the
harmless kinds of land usage that this particular case illustrates.
For now, this Court must accept and affirm the Board's
decision. The Court is respectful of the Board's decision, but
affirms it with the hope and expectation that the St. Croix
Riverway District regulations will be examined to address the
matters raised by the Court.
Da May 8, 1995
w
Eric J. Lu dell
Circuit Judge
Branch I
II
I
I
III
I'
6
effect on the St. Croix Riverway District. The proposed
construction would not be visible from the St. Croix River. The
"Court sees this issue as the critical issue in this and any similar
case.
Additionally, the Court sees this particular request by the
landowner as being quite harmless to the environment and one based
on rational reasons, if not technically correct ones.
The Court can take judicial notice of the Minnesota portion of
the St. Croix Riverway District lying to the west of the subject
property. Whether you consider simply the Bayport-Stillwater
corridor lying along the river or whether you factor in the Allan
S. King NSP plant with its immense smokestack and coal piles or the
adjacent Andersen Windows plant, you are hard pressed to argue in
favor of the merits of respondent's position in this case.
Technicalities are handy at times to use to avoid the reality of
significant changes made along the river, particularly in
Minnesota, that have been ignored over the last twenty years or so
since the creation of the St. Croix Riverway District.
The Court is critical of some of the St. Croix Riverway
District regulations. Some are too restrictive and too technical.
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources encourages this rigid
9 g
approach. By simply sending a letter to the Board objecting to a
variance application, the DNR is able to veto an y request.
uest.
q
It appears to be the right time to change the regulations
along the St. Croix River in order to modernize the actual
situation along the river.
5
ST. CROIX COUNTY
(,✓� � _, WISCONSIN
L OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL
I lop nil Nun ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
NNYp
- - 1101 Carmichael Road
Hudson, WI W16-7710
(715) 381-431 715) 381-4301
June 7, 1994
P
` "G x\/
Lori Meyer
Clerk of Circuit Court
St. Croix County Government Center
Hudson, WI 54016
RE: Erickson v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
File No. 94 CV 161
Dear Ms. Meyer:
Enclosed is the Board of Adjustment record regarding the above entitled action.
By copy of this letter, I am notifying Robert Mudge, attorney for Plaintiff, of the filing of
the record with the Court.
Sincerely yours,
Gregory A. Timmerman
Corporation Counsel
St. Croix County, Wisconsin
GAT/kas
Enclosure
cc Robert Mudge
Tom Nelson
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT ST. CROIX COUNTY
JOHN ERICKSON)
Petitioner,
RETURN TO WRIT OF
VS. CERTIORARI
ST. CROIX COUNTY BOARD CASE NO. 94 CV 161
OF ADJUSTMENT,
Respondent.
John Bradley, Chairman, St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, hereby certifies that
the complete record of the matter of Petitioner's application for variances is herewith
enclosed and filed with the Court.
This return includes all minutes, notes, records, files, and papers, including a typed
transcript of all proceedings pertaining to this matter.
Dated this I)TN day of June, 1994.
?)d aaqg��
V ra ey
Chairman, Board of Adj stment
St. Croix County
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND- HEARING
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter. )
May 26, 1994
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 8: 30 a.m.
A role call was made. All were present except for the absence of
Tom Dorsey. Chairman Bradley thought Mr. Dorsey would be joining
them shortly.
Filipiak made a motion to approve the agenda, seconded by Mehls.
Motion carried.
Neuman made a motion to approve the minutes as mailed, seconded by
Filipiak. Motion carried.
June 23 , 1994 will be the date of the next regular meeting.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
John Bettendorf
Nelson indicated that the removal of the driveway was at a
standstill at this dime due to the appeal which was filed to move
the second driveway to the south.
n Erickson
Nelson stated that he had talked to Mr. Erickson's attorney who
stated that they will be appealing.
Gary Sukowatey
Nelson indicated that he had met with Mr. Sukowatey's attorney,
Robert Mudge, regarding Sukowatey possibly appealing this case.
Mr. Mudge stated he would be trying to mitigate at this time.
Todd Featherstone
Nelson indicated that this will end up in Circuit Court as Mr.
Featherstone is refusing to remove the driveway in the Town of
Troy, Tower Road, east of County F, south of town. Featherstone
does not have a 200 foot driveway separation. A violation was also
issued as the driveway has not been removed at this time.
It was mentioned by Neuman that because of the volume in Board of
Adjustment applications that possibly they should hold 2 meetings
a month. Nelson explained to the board that due to the time frame
that the townships have to get their decisions to the Zoning Office
it would be very difficult.
It was noted by Chairman Bradley that Mr. Dorsey was now present at
8 : 47 a.m. and that the Board of Adjustment roster was now complete.
NEW BUSINESS:
The hearing was called to order at 9 : 04 a.m. by Chairman Bradley.
Nelson read the notice of the hearing as published:
PUBLIC HEARING
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public hearing
for Thursday, May 26, 1994 at 9: 00 a.m. at the Government Center, 1101
Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin, to consider the following appeals to
the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on-site investigation will be
made of each site in question, after which the board will return for the
purpose of deliberating and voting on the appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17 . 36 (5) (c) l Bluffline Setback
APPELLANT: John P. Berdusco
LOCATION: Gov't Lot 1, Sec. 26, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy
and the NW', , SW, and in Gov't Lot 1 of
Sec. 25, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy
2 . ARTICLE: 17 . 14 (6) (a) Third Residence on Farm
APPELLANT: Steven/Nancy Ulrich
LOCATION: SE', , SE', , Sec. 33, T31N-R17W, Town of Stanton
3 . ARTICLE: 17 . 80 (3) (c) 3 Temporary Occupancy
APPELLANT: Reid W. Ferguson
LOCATION: NE, , NW; , Sec. 25, T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph
4 . ARTICLE: 17 . 31 (2) Setback from High Water Mark
APPELLANT: Gerald M. Garrity
LOCATION: SW, , SE, , Sec. 23, T30N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph
5. ARTICLE: 17. 15 (n) Hot Mix Plant
APPELLANT: Mathy Construction Company/Le Roy Carey
LOCATION: SW; , SW, , SEC. 19, T28N-R19W, Town of Eau Galle
6. ARTICLE: 17 . 18 (1) (r) Family Recreation Area
(Skiing, inner tubing, skating, snowmobiling,
golf, restaurant/conference center, bar)
APPELLANT: Snowcrest Resort, Inc./Manny Villafana
LOCATION: SE; , SW; of Sec. 7, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset;
SW; , SE; of Sec. 7, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset;
SE; , SE; of Sec. 7, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset;
NE; , SE', of Sec. 7, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset;
NE; , NW; of Sec. 18, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset;
NW; , NE', of Sec. 18, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset;
NW; , SE, of Sec. 18, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset;
SE; , NW; of Sec. 18 , T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset.
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and be
heard. Additional information may be obtained from the office of
the St. Croix County Zoning Administrator, Hudson, Wisconsin at
715/386-4680.
John Bradley, Chairman
St. Croix Co. Board of Adjustment
Chairman Bradley introduced the other members of board as being Tom
Dorsey, Tim Filipiak, Jerry Neuman and Charles Mehls. Tom Nelson,
Zoning Administrator, was present to assist the board with the
introduction of the materials as well as recommendations as to how
the ordinances applied.
Chairman Bradley explained the procedures of the hearing requesting
that individuals wishing to testify sign their name in the front of
the room on the sign up sheet provided.
John Berdusco
Nelson indicated that this was a variance request for a bluffline
setback on the St. Croix River. The ordinance requires a 100 foot
setback from the bluffline with a 12 percent slope. Mr. Berdusco
would also like to increase the size of the structure to make it
more livable.
Nelson introduced Exhibit #1 as being a packet of information with
a maroon binding; Exhibit #2, site plan; Exhibit #3 , main floor
plan; Exhibit #4 , lower level floor plan; Exhibit #5, map of
elevations; Exhibit #6, another copy of the floor plan; Exhibit #7,
plan of existing structure; and Exhibit #8, correspondence from the
Town of Troy. Nelson indicated that the Zoning Office cannot
support this request as there is a reasonable use on the property.
At the time Mr. Berdusco contacted the township he indicated that
the Zoning Office and DNR were in support of his request. Nelson
indicated that he called Mr. Berdusco and told him he would not
take a positive stand on this project.
Francis Ogden, being duly sworn on oath, indicated that he was
acting on behalf of Mr. Berdusco as he was out of town on business.
Francis stated that a David Zanick had bought this land in 1969 and
in 1973 he built on it. Ogden introduced Exhibit #9 as being the
original plans back in 1973 . At that time, part of the building
was built. Harold Barber, prior Zoning Administrator, okayed the
building site at that time. At that time the setback from the
bluffline was 40 feet. Zanick couldn't afford to build the entire
building, 20 years went by and it was used as a seasonal home
instead of a permanent residence. Berdusco would like to buy this
from Zanick. He would like to comply with the regulations except
for the setback. The proposed addition is on the opposite side of
the house from the original plans as it would be more difficult to
attempt to get a variance because it is more conspicuous from the
river.
Nelson indicated again that he would not be supporting this
endeavor and also the DNR verbally expressed some concerns on this
application.
Ogden went on to say that the hardship is that it has to remain a
seasonal cabin instead of having it be a permanent residence. It
is not large enough to be a single family dwelling. When the
ordinance was created, a 40 foot was acknowledged and adopted at
that time.
Nelson introduced Exhibit #10 as being a packet of information
which better identifies the value of the structure. Nelson
indicated that the original structure is non-conforming at this
time because of its location. An inquiry was made by Neuman as to
whether or not there was another location on this property for a
new structure and Ogden indicated yes, further back. Ogden
introduced Exhibit #11 as being a similar situation 1 mile from
this location in the same township which was granted, the McGraw
property. He also introduced Exhibit #12 as being the McGraw Board
of Adjustment Notice of Appeal. It was noted by Bradley that the
standards have tighten since 1989.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision later this date.
Steven/Nancy Ulrich
Nelson indicated that this was a request for a special exception,
third residence on farm. It is an after-the-fact application. The
permitted uses at this time are 2 . This third residence could only
be used for an individual working on the farm. If sold, the parcel
should be able to stand on its own. At this time, the structure
meets code. Ulrich went through the rezonement, transferred the
property and needed a CSM. To correct the problem, he is applying
for a special exception. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1 as being a
site plan of the property.
Steven Ulrich, duly sworn on oath, indicated that he went through
the channels and that he has been associated in dairy all his life.
They transferred the ownership from his brother and it became in
violation.
Nelson indicated that the problem was with the deed transfer, that
they needed to reverse that. Nelson also noted that the Town of
Stanton supports this and asks that the money be refunded to
Ulrich.
Ulrich stated that the residence has a new septic system, new well
for a 4 bedroom house and that it is 3/8ths of a mile from the
other residences. They have a 900 acre farm, 600 acres of it being
in Stanton Township. They transferred this property for mortgage
purposes. He went on to say that the farm is a common ownership of
3 residences.
Bradley indicated that the Board will view the site and render a
decision later this date.
Reid Ferguson
Nelson indicated that this was a request for a special exception
use for temporary occupancy on property in conjunction with the
construction of his new residence. There is some question as to
water supply, septic system and how long the trailer home will be
there. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1 as being a site plan.
Reid Ferguson, being duly sworn on oath, stated that his is
building his own house. He has a young family of 3 children. He
needs to be able to work at the site after his regular job to spend
time to build the house. With his family living there, he would be
able to keep an eye on his kids. He stated he would be doing the
masonry but will be subcontracting for other things. He went on to
say that he went to St. Joseph's town meeting and it was approved
at that level . He plans on being in the trailer for 6 months from
the time of the decision and hopes to move into his new residence
by wintertime. The sanitary system will provide service to the
trailer temporarily. Mr. Ferguson also indicated that he needs an
energy audit before obtaining his building permit.
Chairman Bradley indicated that they will view the site and render
a decision later this date.
Gerald Garrity
Nelson indicated that this was a request for a variance for a
setback from the high water mark as he is requesting to add on to
the existing residence on the east side of Bass Lake. Nelson went
on to say that he has heard nothing from the Town of St. Joseph nor
the Bass Lake Rehab District. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1 as
being a site plan; Exhibit 2 , Deed of property; Exhibit #3 , Holding
Tank Servicing Contract; Exhibit #4 , map of property from blue
print; Exhibit #5, copy of proposed house plans of the existing
structure. Nelson went on to state that this is a nonconforming
structure as it is close to the high water mark and that Mr.
Garrity is requesting an addition above his current structure. He
went on to state that in his opinion the Board should delay their
decision until they hear back from the Town of St. Joseph and the
Bass Lake Rehab. District.
Gerald Garrity, being duly sworn on oath, states that this property
has been in his family since 1955. In 1962 the house was built. He
has had it for the last 15 years. Garrity indicated that being
where he is in a low spot, there was a need for a holding tank due
to the water level . Garrity introduced Exhibit #6 as being 3
photos of his house which were taken on April 6, 1994 . He stated
that this is a 2 bedroom house and at the present time he is the
only one living there at this time but hopes to change the
situation shortly. His second bedroom is used as a utility room
for his washer and dryer. Presently the house is about 1, 400
square feet and he would be adding upwards about 400 feet. The
cost of this addition would be approximately $20, 000. 00 to
$24 , 000. 00. There is no basement and the new structure will not
obstruct the view of any neighbors.
It was indicated to Garrity that he will need to appear next month
with his contractor with the bids in writing.
Mathy Construction/LeRoy Carey
Nelson indicated that this is a request for a special exception use
permit for a temporary hot mix plant for a town, county or state
highway. The current pit is in Eau Galle township off of Highway
63 . It was noted that there had been a hot mix plant there in
previous years. This special exception use permit is only good for
120 days in total . Nelson introduced Exhibit #1 as being a site
plan of the property; Exhibit #2 as being correspondence from Eau
Galle Township supporting this application. Nelson indicated that
the Zoning Office also supports this application as long as it
meets the standards.
Barton M. Lund, being first duly sworn, stated that he is
representing Mathy Construction. Mathy Construction filed the
application on behalf of the needs of the St. Croix County Highway
Department. Construction will be on State Highway 72 in Pierce
County in September and they will also be doing some work for St.
Croix County, Eau Galle Township, in July. In each instance it
will take 2 to 3 weeks worth of work to set up and take down the
plant. Nelson indicated that they would need the facility plan,
the hours, duration, quality action, state DNR plans and the clean
up. Mr. Lund indicated that he does not have the information at
this time but could produce the packet at a later date. It will
take 15, 000 tons of material on Highway 72, which will take less
than 2 weeks and 15, 000 tons for the County in July, a total of
30, 000 to 40, 000 tons of material. They will be moving the
material in 2 weeks earlier to prepare for the hot mix plant. The
hours will be 6: 00 a.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. Mathy Construction works 5
days a week, with an occasional Saturday. In the past 4 years they
have been at this site 3 or 4 times. The permit will run from July
to October and they will be providing a satellite for the workers.
Bradley indicated that the Board will view the site and will render
a decision later this date.
Snowcrest Resort, Inc. Mann Villafana
Inc./Manny
Nelson indicated that this was a special exception use permit for
a family recreational area. There is a need for commercial zoning
on this g
ro ert . The Zoning Office has identified the need for
P P Y
the applicants to develop good plans to review and the decision
will be based on complete information. There will be a need for an
elaborate septic system for the conference center, condos and
restaurant. There is also a need for DILHR to get involved and Bob
Heise from Land Conservation for cooling ponds for the makeup of
snow. At this time, the applicants do not have very much
information. It is the opinion of the Zoning Office that the Board
cannot recommend a formal approval at this time. Nelson indicated
that he has talked to the applicants and that they are only looking
for a nod of conceptional approval from the Board that this plan in
fact could work. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1 as being a brief
plan of activities out there; and Exhibit #2 as being a faxed
letter from the Town of Somerset endorsing the activities.
Michael Draeger and Steve Dorpinghaus, being first duly sworn on
oath stated that they are presenting this project as a conception
only at this time. They will produce drawings and present it at a
later date. They have a need for acceptance in the community and
by this Board at this time for the purpose of their investors. At
the present time there is 284 acres for this project. Draker
introduced Exhibit #3 as being an aerial photo of the site. He
indicated that there is enough land for an 18 hole golf course on
the existing property. There will be various kinds of winter
activities. There will be a bar and restaurant and rental villas
to go around the area. They have had contact with Marty Beekman
from the State Highway Commission to see if there will be some form
of exit off of County Road V. At this time, the State cannot tell
them where the highway will be going. They are looking at a 10
year project with the highway being worked on in 1998 and 1999 with
it opening in the year 2000. Draker indicated that Mr. Villafana
supports this project. The ski resort was shut down 10 to 12 years
ago and 2 years ago the buildings were removed. Mr. Villafana was
the owner of the ski resort at the time it was shut down and
presently still is the owner of the land. The taxes are paid up to
date. They indicated that they would be updating the run down ski
areas, updating the buildings as they are dark, the layout isn't
adequate. The new ski area will be clean, open, family oriented,
high quality and scenic. A much more different ski resort than
before. He indicated that Dickson Jones would be backing the
project and they will be federally funded and bonded. There will
be 12 full-time year round employees with 250 seasonal jobs. The
barriers they are facing is the access for the new road and also
what part of their terrain, if any, will be taken for the highway.
Chairman Bradley stated that this plan sounds interesting and
ambitious but that it was not in the scope of the Board based on
the presentation to request a show of hands.
Harold Buckentin, being first duly sworn, stated that he is a
member of the bow hunters club, which own 57 acres directly in
front of the ski resort. In the past they have had problems with
skiers going through their property to get to other lifts. The
only concern he has is that they establish the boundary lines for
safety reasons. He indicated that he did realize this was going to
be as big of a project as they are proposing but believes it to be
a good idea and would favor the project.
DECISIONS
Having completed the hearing testimony, the board visited each site
in question. Upon completion, the following decisions were
rendered:
John P. Berdusco
Motion by Neuman, seconded by Bradley to deny the request for a
variance set back from the bluffline of the St. Croix River. There
is currently a reasonable use on the property. No hardship could
be demonstrated. An option exists with the existing screen porch,
and there is a lack of support from the township and the D.N.R.
Vote to approve said motion: Neuman, yes; Mehls, yes; Dorsey, yes;
Filipiak, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion carried to deny the variance
request.
Steven/Nancy Ulrich
Motion by Mehls, seconded by Filipiak to approve the request for a
third residence on the farm with the condition that the parcel that
had been transferred from the farm creating the violation be
transferred back again so as to create a single description of
land. Vote to approve said motion: Filipiak, yes; Neuman, no;
Dorsey, yes; Mehls, yes; Bradley, no. Motion carried.
Reid Ferguson
Motion by Neuman, seconded by Dorsey to approve the request for a
temporary occupancy for a six month period in a mobile home that is
to be moved onto the property. All proper sanitary and building
permits are to be obtained. Vote to approve said motion: Dorsey,
yes; Filipiak, yes; Neuman, yes; Mehls, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion
carried.
Gerald Garrity
Motion by Filipiak, seconded by Bradley to postpone a decision
until a recommendation can be received from the township and the
Bass Lake Rehab. District. Vote to approve said motion: Neuman,
yes; Mehls, yes; Dorsey, yes; Filipiak, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion
carried.
Mathy Construction Co./LeRoy Carey
Motion by Neuman, seconded by Mehls to approve the request for a
hot mix plant with the conditions that the use be for public roads
only, that a complete facility plan be filed in the Zoning office,
the operation be terminated after 120 days, and that there be a
complete restoration and cleanup of the property so that it is left
as it originally had been before the operation began. Vote to
approve said motion: Mehls, yes; Neuman, yes; Dorsey, yes;
Filipiak, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion carried.
Snowcrest Resort, Inc./Manny Villafana
Motion by Bradley, seconded by Filipiak to postpone a decision
until there is a complete plan as recommended by the Zoning
Administrator. Vote to approve said motion: Mehls, yes; Neuman,
no; Dorsey, yes; Filipiak, yes, ; Bradley, yes. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted:
go ftanu Kmjn�
rome Neuman, secretary
mz
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter. )
April 28, 1994
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 9: 00 a.m.
A role call was made. All were present except for the absence of
Charles Mehls.
Neuman made a motion to approve the agenda, seconded by Dorsey.
Motion carried.
Neuman made a motion to approve the minutes as mailed, seconded by
Bradley. Motion carried.
May 26, 1994 will be the date of the next regular meeting.
It was indicated that there is a seminar in New Richmond on May 14,
1994 that the Board of Adjustment members should attend.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Neuman made a motion to nominate John Bradley Chairman of the Board
of Adjustment. Dorsey further motioned to unanimously vote Bradley
in as Chairman, seconded by Filipiak. Motion carried.
Neuman made a motion to nominate Tom Dorsey Vice Chairman of the
Board of Adjustment, seconded by Filipiak. A unanimous vote was
reflected. Motion carried.
Bradley made a motion to nominate Neuman as Board of Adjustment
Secretary, seconded by Filipiak. A unanimous vote was reflected.
Motion carried.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
John Erickson
Nelson stated that no appeals have been filed at this time by John
Erickson.
John Bettendorf
Nelson indicated that this was a trucking facility in the Town of
Kinnickinnic. Approval was made for the removal of one driveway.
The Board of Adjustment's decision was upheld in Court.
Bettendorf's attorney stated that they are willing to remove the
driveway but there is some questions as to which driveway is to be
removed. Nelson will be sending a letter to the County Highway
Department.
Chairman Bradley indicated that Mr. Swagger was a victim of bad
advice from the Town of Warren. He indicated that the Board viewed
this site last month. Being that no one from the Town of Warren
appeared for this meeting, Stephens made a motion to grant Mr.
Swagger's driveway separation variance request in that he is
innocent of the situation. He further stated that a letter of
reprimand should go to the Town of Warren Board for their
discourtesy in not appearing before the Board of Adjustment.
Menter seconded said motion. Bradley indicated that he supported
the letter of reprimand. Role call: Neuman, no; Menter, yes;
Stephens, yes; Bradley, yes. Reflection of role call vote, 3 to 1.
Motion carried. Bradley indicated that Mr. Swagger can move
forward.
John Bettendorf
Nelson indicated this was an reaffirmation of a driveway ruling
which was supported by Judge Richards. Because of the lapse in
time since the decision, the Highway Department is requesting a
reaffirmation of the decision.
Bradley stated that the board should follow the plan that the
Highway Department submitted, that being that the driveway should
be removed. The Highway Department was advised to remove the
driveway. Judge Richards defended the County's position. Zoning
Administrator Nelson was instructed to send the Highway Department
a letter to take the driveway out. It was also indicated that John
Bettendorf will be billed for this service.
Neuman made a motion to reaffirm the decision of the Board of
Adjustment with regard to the John Bettendorf case which was
seconded by Bradley. Role call was taken: Menter, yes; Neuman,
yes; Stephens, no; Bradley, yes. Reflection of role call vote: 3
to 1. Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS:
The hearing was called to order at 9:30 a.m. by Chairman Bradley.
Nelson read the notice of the hearing as published:
PUBLIC HEARING
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public
hearing for Thursday, March 24, 1994 at 9:30 a.m. at the Government
Center, 1101 Carmichael Rd. , Hudson, Wisconsin to consider the
following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on-
site investigation will be made of each site in question, after
which the board will return for the purpose of deliberating and
voting on the appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17 . 15 (6) (f) Dog Kennel
APPELLANT: Richard E. Lee
LOCATION: NW; , NE', , Sec. 10, T29N-R19W, Town of St.
Joseph
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter. )
March 24, 1994
I
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 9:00 a.m.
A role call was made. All were present except for the absence of
the late Bernard Kinney.
Stephens made a motion to approve the agenda, seconded by Menter.
Motion carried.
Stephens made a motion to approve the minutes as mailed, seconded
by Menter. Motion carried.
April 28, 1994 will be the date of the next regular meeting.
It was indicated that there would be an election of officers at the
next Board of Adjustment meeting being there will be a new
committee.
REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PERMITS:
Gary Sukowatey
A copy of the decision and appeal were given to all members of the
board by Zoning Administrator Tom Nelson. Nelson indicated that
Attorney Gregory Timmerman, Corporation Counsel, would be holding
off on answering the appeal. It was stated by Nelson that
business related vehicles should be in the screening area as well
as worked on vehicles. He went on to state that Gary Sukowatey
believes he needs further interpretation of the decision which the
Board previously issued. Chairman Bradley indicated that the
decision of the Board stands as is.
John Erickson
Mention was made by Nelson that John Erickson would probably be
appealing the decision which the Board of Adjustment made in their
last session, that being February 24, 1994 .
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Raymond Swagger
Nelson stated that Mr. Swagger put in a cement slab near his
residence in the Town of Warren. A violation was noted by the
Zoning Office. The Board heard Swagger's application last month
and that the matter was put on hold pending an appearance by an
officer from the Town of Warren.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter. )
February 24, 1994
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 9: 00 a.m.
He explained the procedures of the hearing requesting that
individuals wishing to testify sign their name in the front of the
room on the sign up sheet provided.
Chairman Bradley introduced the other members of the board as being
Bob Stephens, George Mentor and Jerome Neuman. There was special
recognition on the late passing of Bernard Kinney who will be
missed. Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator, was present to assist
the board with the introduction of the materials as well as
recommendations as to how the ordinances applied.
Mentor made a motion to approve the agenda, seconded by Neuman.
Motion carried.
Stephens made a motion to approve the minutes as mailed, seconded
by Mentor. Motion carried.
March 24, 1994 will be the date of the next regular meeting.
Old Business
John Bettendorf
Bradley indicated that there had been a recent finding by Judge
Richards regarding this lawsuit. Nelson will find out how the case
stands.
Unfinished Business
John Erickson
Chairman Bradley indicated that he was not present at last month's
meeting but had read the minutes to said meeting and knew about the
Erickson variance requests. Attorney Robert Mudge, representing
the Ericksons and first being duly sworn, stated that this was a
setback variance off the bluff line of the St. Croix River and
State Trunk Highway 35. A storage shed had been started but was
immediately stopped when learned they did not have a building
permit for the construction of this shed. Nelson introduced
Exhibits 1 through 5, those being the following items:
1) Original site plan dated 1/27/94 ;
2) Picture showing the site;
3) Dan Koich, DNR letter dated 1/27/94 ;
4) Motion was made by Orf & Barnes dated January 22 , 1994
regarding no digging on the said of the garage;
5) Full set of plans, including actual building plans, dated
1/27/94 .
Nelson indicated he had some concerns on these proposals in that he
could not see that there was a true hardship. Nelson indicated
that Dan Koich had the same concerns as he did. Nelson went on to
say that he and Koich tried to view the site but were stopped by
the gates and the no trespassing sign.
Stephens indicated that the Board was uncertain of the highway
easement as far as the hardship was concerned. They had two
problems with this 1) Enlargement of the house going against the
bluff line; and 2) Construction of the shed, started without a
permit, being too close to the right of way of the road.
Stephens inquired as to the approximate square footage of the house
at this time and also the value of the addition to the house.
Mudge indicated that the square footage was under 2,000 square feet
at this time and that the addition would add another 1, 100 square
feet. The house was assessed at $137,700.00 and Attorney Mudge
indicated that this was less than the fair market value of the
house. The addition would cost approximately $53,000.00/structure
only. Mudge went through the problems that the Ericksons are
having with the house, those being that the Ericksons have 3
children and the house is now not big enough, no privacy, there is
a 2 car garage and no outside storage. There have also been
problems with theft in the area and this would be the reason for
the construction of the shed.
Chairman Bradley indicated that he supports the DNR's objection to
this variance. Dan Koich, DNR representative, after being duly
sworn, indicated that he had not seen the property when he wrote
the letter and that he would be glad to view the property. He went
on to say that 2,000 square feet is adequate for a family with 3
children. The criteria for a variance should be because the land
creates the hardship and not because of personal convenience.
Koich cited State v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment, a case
regarding a variance, which was upheld in 1992 .
John A. Erickson, after first being duly sworn, testified on his
own behalf stating that this was a very open house and that there
was no privacy in the home with 3 children. There being 3 small
bedrooms and 2 baths. He went on to say that if the Board did not
grant his request that he would have to look for new housing, which
in his opinion was unfair.
Corporation Counsel Greg Timmerman attended said meeting and
explained the new rule that all Board of Adjustment hearings and
decisions had to be held under the open meeting law due to a recent
case which went to the Supreme Court, Hodge v. Town of Turtle Lake.
Mr. Timmerman indicated that the Board of Adjustment was a quasi
judicial body and that they were there to weigh the facts, apply
the law, state openly the facts and come to a conclusion. There
was some discussion as to the role of Zoning Administrator Nelson.
Mr. Nelson can advise and give his opinion as to if he thought the
variance would pass but the Board of Adjustment ultimately makes
the decision.
There was some discussion as to the open meeting law and the time
set for the hearings. The Board indicated that the appeal hearings
would be held in the morning but that they could not specifically
set a time for each one. They would try to accommodate the public
as best as possible. After the hearings were completed they would
view the sites and render a decision.
New Business
The hearing was called to order at 10: 17 a.m. Nelson read the
notice of the hearing as published:
Public Hearing:
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public
hearing for Thursday, February 24, 1994 at 9:30 a.m. at the
Government Center, 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin, to
consider the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning
Ordinance. An on-site investigation will be made of each site in
question, after which the board contemplates adjournment into
closed sessions for the purpose of deliberating on the appeals,
pursuant to Sec. 19.85(1) (a) , Wisconsin Statutes. The Board will
reconvene into open session for the purpose of voting on the
appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17. 64 (1) (D) 2 Setback from Town Road
17. 64 (5) 3 Driveway Separation
APPELLANT: Raymond E. Swagger
LOCATION: E1/2, NE1/4, Sec. 20, T29N-R18W, Town of
Warren
2. ARTICLE 17. 15(M) Airport Campground
APPELLANT: Baldwin Airport/Michael Hayden
LOCATION: SW1/4, SW1/4, Sec. 25, T29N-R17W, Town of
Hammond.