HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-1000-70-075 (2)
/ r
f/ Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page I of 3
Division of Safety and Buildings
in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code
County St. Croix
Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must
include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D.
percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. 0) 7
ca~
JeWn print all itiftm oll. @Ni~ 801@ /
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). G~%~%r arm- 2 a Q (O
Property Owner Property Location
Country View Construction (Brent & Sonja Johnson) Govt. Lot SE 1/4 NE 1/4 S I T 18 N R 19 E(or)W
❑ )W
Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM#
499 Country View Road 3 V. (Q P '?(Raa44ig4
City State Zip Code Phone Number ❑City []MIlage Town Nearest Road
Hudson, WI 54016 ( 715 ) 386 - 2085 Boundary Road
Q New Construction Useo Residential / Number of bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 600 GPD
❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe:
Parent material loess over till/outwash Flood Plain elevation if applicable NA ft.
General comments MOUND SYSTEM 0.5 ft. Sand Fill -0.6 Loading Rate
and recommendations: ~ L
(If Pretreatment - groun rl CGS f/ -
TJ
• r
Boring '
rl pit 6found wk-e du. 91:14 fl. Npth to limiting factef in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
1 0-6 10YR2/2 I 3f-mgr mvfr as 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 6-20 10YR3/3 sit 2fsbk mfr as 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
3 20-30., 7.5YR3/4 sl 2fsbk mfr cs 2vf-co 0.6 1.0
4 30-40 7.5YR3/4 Is& r lfsbk mvfr 2v-co 0.7 ~ 1.6
(Horizon 3 has some gravel.) l
!~f c~uhQ Soi s
I
❑2 Boring # R Boring 99.04 38
❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff
in: Munwll u: 4 E®nt: E®10f Qf: 4 §h: !vol ' Pffn
1 0-6 10YR2/2 I 3fgr mvfr as 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 6-22 10YR3/3 sit 2fabk mfr cs 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
3 22-38 7.5YR3/4 sl Ifsbk mvfr as 2vf-co 0.6 1.0
4 38-40 7.5YR3/4 fIf7.5YR4/4 A Ifsbk mvfr 2vf-co 0.6 1.0
(Horizons 3 & 4 have some gravel.)
* Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BOD, < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L
CST Name (Please Print) Sig ature CST Number
Ma Jo Hollister 224832
Address _ Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
W9875 690th Avenue, River Falls, WI 54022 05 - 05 - 04 & 03 - 11 - 06 (715) 426 - 1775
1
Property Owner Johnson (Lot 3) Parcel ID # (Pending) Page 2 of 3
❑ Boring
Boring # E] Pit Ground surface elev. 95.39 ft. Depth to limiting factor 40 in. Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. "Eff#1 -Eff#2
1 0-5 10YR2/2 I 3f-mgr mvfr cs 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 _5--2-2- 1QYR3/3 sil 2fabk mfr as 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
3 22-40 7.5YR3/4 A 2fsbk m.fr as 2vf-co 0.6 1.0
4 40-42 7.5YR3/4 f1f 7.5YR4/4 sl Ifsbk mfr 2vf-co 0.4 0.7
Boring # n
n pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fg
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 -Eff#2
Boring
Boring # ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Application Rate
b@FlA@fl Npth D@fflin@f1l D@I@f f@dott D@§@r1P11@n T@kluf@ §1rd@1@r@ D@n§I§1@%@ 9@llnd@fy R@@l§
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 -Eff#2
Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOD, < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. Ifyou need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
SBD-8330Test (R.07/00)
PLOf PLAN P/alff .-2-7-,
pl~Op~2(Y 01M~12 J'ONA1 5 'VA Lam: / ~=y0 ` CFFT WHEer- A1QT
~r.AL t SG~'iIOW: !4 PARrF< ,nor o r,u 6M~ , A
. • cn inll nil f
- TZ - -
THe AWE 4 -S EC
gig W, ' ` GFT :3 • ~ - tFi - < F PVC ,r'C 50' V+~
i s 0-50L 00" W/ B, ,
NO Comm m "/a pRO ZN6
b ! J
y ~,''.LNoK'TN PAL - S'~i+K~
U i
gR.04
r L
r
ilk ~ Q:
~i l✓lyr, ~,fj rr,~~ ~ 1 rf f r}. ; N a
E-LA
33
y~ n
v
w;
r t y.~2.0
xd ;
-rcwa~RD, ~ .
0
ST CROIX COUNTY
PLANNING & ZONING
.d
MEMO
DATE: April 6, 2006
a
To: Mary Jo Hollister, CST #224832
CodeAdministrat FROM: Pam Quinn, POWTS Inspector #665054
715-386-4680
Land Information & RE: Brent & Sonja Johnson/Country View Construction
Planning CSM #762523 Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4, Section 1, Town of Troy
715-386-4674 -
On April 5th, I visited all four lots for this CSM to verify data submitted on
Real Prop March 16th amended soil reports. With your assistance in re-flagging some of the
715-3 677 test pits and hand borings, I was able to confirm locations for all tested areas. I
Re cling apologize if previous memos made it appear that work had not been completed, but
-386-4675 the discrepancies between lot lines for concept and final CSM, the surveyor's soil
boring markers on the map, plus the use of two test pits by Dave Fogerty all made it
very difficult to identify the tested areas.
Lot 1: There are two soil reports for this lot. The BM#2 for the 3/13/06 revised site
plan was not visible anywhere near B2, but BM#1 is flagged in blue and available
for use in mound installation. The tested area on soil report dated 10/23/03 has
pink flagging and reported A±O conditions, which would require a state on-site soil
determination for mound design approval. See requirement for Lot 4.
Lot 2: There are also two valid soil reports for this lot. Your BM#1 is a nail on west
side of tree 21 feet south of B2 and flagged with blue tape, as are B1 and B2 (both
excavated pits). BM#2 is the "top of PVC pipe" at 23" above grade and the 98.78'
elevation should be double-checked. Dave Fogerty's soil report extends south of
Mary Jo's tested area and allows flexibility in mound location and design. The site
has not been altered and the contours indicated adequately represent the existing
topography.
Lot 3: My only criticism is that Comm 85.20(2)(b) specifically requires "at least one
soil profile evaluation excavation per treatment or dispersal site shall be constructed
as a soil pit" for estimated DWF of <1,000 gallons per day. This lot has three hand
borings, with B3 being a hand-auger hole that was done while frost was still in the
ground. The nearest excavated test pit is Dave Fogerty's B1, which is on Lot 2 >40
feet away. The new hand boring B3 is 77 feet southeast of a flagged as B1, which
is 16 feet south of the north lot line. The "existing pit from Fogerty" (131) is 41 feet
northeast of your B1. The PVC pipe shown as BM#2 has been flagged in pink tape
and B2 is flagged next to it.
ST. CRO1X COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 101 CARMICHAEL ROAD, HUDSON, W1 54016 715386-4686 FAX
PZ@CO.SAINT-CROIX WI US
WWW.CO.SAINT-CROIX WI US
L ':~Tfound both blue-flagged benchmarks and excavate es pis an u cou n't
S, ecifically locate B3. B2 had standing water in it and the entire lot's soils were saturated at
t e ground surface. This lot requires an on-site soil evaluation by the state to determine if
th a is A + 4 inches of soil above seasonal soil saturation. BM#2 is approx. 11 inches above
gra nd needs to have its 102.96' elevation corrected (it is next to B2 at
Let to schedule the on-site for Lot 4 and the additional excavated test pit for the same day
an (with elevation corrections requested) these four soil reports should be ready for use
in P TS design and sanitary permit applications.
r
t4.
` ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 10 1 CARMICHAEL ROAD, HUDSON, W/ 54016 715-386-4686 FAX
PZ@CO.SAINT-CROIX.WLUS WWW.CO.SAINT-CROIX.WI.US
CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP
LOCATED IN PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 19 WEST, TOWN OF TROY, ST. CROIX
COUNTY, WISCONSIN.
SETBACK NOTE: 3
FRONT SETBACK = 150'
SIDE SETBACK = 50' NE COR SEC 1
REAR SETBACK LOT 3 CSM VOL. 5 PAGE 1324
50' FOUND SURVEY I lo~2
1 NORTH LINE OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 N 89'45'47" E 1320.73' MARK NAIL 1 1 °0
1279.70' I Lo
a 41.03' I
APPROVED 0
ST. CROIX COUNTY 0
and Parks Committee I 1 1
PIBnMng Zonlnq
MAY 13 2004
if not rsoorded wllhln 30 days of LOT 1 I 1
o epRMVNI dote •PProvol shall he
null and vnld 611048 S.F. ZI
3
` 14.03 Ac. N 89'45'47" E 353.01
E, R. 595702 S. F. 311.98'
41 13.67 Ac. LOT 2 41.03'
108721 S.F. I
p $ c""O'''AI`~~'/ +~'i ~cP sib . 2.503 Ac.
z ' 61 E. R. 96b88 S.F.I zz
o (ROGER LYNN 2.21; Ac. 00 a
00 $ 1JUMPHREY 8 l a
k~' I
I ~ i Yq! ~ ~ I co i i n w l
1 La La a S-2183 N 0 \ N8,8 9' 5'47 E 353.01'I 1 1 Q
CL. WOODVI' w 1 a
z LL_ z 0 i o WI 0 311.98 Z
<,q •~-1 * \ i N---~-~ 41.03' 1 Pi
(nI
N ' LOT 3 Not o
LOT 4 ° o
3108726 'S.F. i°
LL 897637 S.F. I z '00 a0I
0 0 1✓ /Q~) 20.60 Ac. ° 2.50 Ac. o o lO I ~I
Z J ~I E.iR. 96088 S. F. cn I ICI
E. R. 837560 S.F. \ `--2 ~1-~• j 1 a'1
~ 0 e N 89'45'47" E 353.01' 1 1 1
cn 50'3 19.28 Ac.
311.98'
41.03'433 ~'AI
L----------------------- I ZD
00 I ICI
A---TOWER OC4
S 89'58'42" E 1274.15' --------------------6ROAD- - -S B9'A1 ~8" W- -J315.03-- EAST_WESI- t/4 LhE- n - -
S89'41'38"V,l - - - - - - -
3941.43' ...,r~GFND: UNPLATTED LANDS FOUND S S EAST URVVEEY I
W 1 COR - - - - - - - I
SEC. i FC"?,'D in IET 3/~4" BY 18" IRON %4 ARK ivr~ii_
3 ALUMINI iM PIN WT. 1.50 LBS./FT. NOTE:
MONUME !T Fni iND 1" IRON PIPE
BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE
EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF
C:_ UNTY ` ECTION MONUMENT SECTION 1, ASSUMED TO BEAR
(FOUND Aq NOTED) S00'04'24' W.
® SOIL BORINGS OWNER:
SCALE: 1" - 200'
BUILDING SETBACK LINE SURVEY CONDUCTED AT THE
REQUEST OF THE OWNER:
o so ioo 200
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY COUNTRY VIEW DEVELOPMENT
499 COUNTRY VIEW ROAD
E. R. = EXCLUDING RIGHT OF WAY AREA HUDSON, WI 54016
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY KEVIN SAMUEL SHEET 1 OF 2
HUMPHREY ENGINEERING
SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION
Integrated Services Bureau
13 East Spruce Street
1*h Chippewa Falls, WI 54729
sconsin INSPECTION REPORT www.commerc(715) 7 6-u22544
Department of Commerce
Date of Inspection: September 22, 2003 Plumber Name and Address:
Project Name: Clapp Lb, _ CSI
Use: Residential
Legal Description: SE, NE, 1, 28, 19W
Site Number: Certified Soil Tester Name and Address:
Subdivision: David Fogerty, CST 221180
Municipality: Town of Troy 28288 McKenzie Rd RECEIVED
County: St. Croix Spooner WI 54801 ;
i
Owner Name and Address:
Plan Transaction Number: 2 6 2003 3
Sanitary Permit Number: Wlliam' H. Clapp DEC 995 65 Ave ` sT Cfloix UOUNIT•
Wastewater Flow: 450-600 gpd Roberts WI 54023.__ z0NING of i;
Persons Present: K Grabau
An onsite investigation was requested by the CST because of unusual or confusing soil conditions at his
site.
It is my opinion that the soils at this site are suitable for an above grade dispersal system such as a
mound system or possibly an at-grade system. The estimated highest level of soil saturation at my test
pit is 36 inches. However, other site factors such as percent and direction of slope, length of an available
installation contour, and uniformity of soil conditions were not evaluated during this investigation.
One soil boring was described and determined to be unsuitable below grade system installation. To
the best of my knowledge this soil boring (T-1) was located near or at the same I as }he southern
most soil boring (13-1) completed by CST Fog- y. ~a Z LoT 3
T-1
00-03" 7.5YR 2.5/2 sil, 2cgr, mfr, cw.
03-12" 1 OYR 4/3, sil, 2msbk, mfr, cw.
12-21" 1 OYR 4/4, cl, 2m-csbk, mfr, cw.
21-36" 7 J E 416 mil I rshk mfr, c,w
36-45" T5YR 4/6 fsl, Om, mvfi in lace , with iron depletions
along a few vertical macro pores (cracks).
If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me.
eroy G. nsky, stewater pecialist
Ljansky@commerce.state.wi.us E-mail
715/726-2544 Voice
715/726-2549 Fax
cc: County ❑ Plumber 91 CST ❑ Owner ❑ Other
ST CRax COUTqTy
AAA
PLANNING ZONING
MEMO
DATE: March 20, 2006
To: Mary Jo Hollister, CST #224832
Co deAdministration FROM: Pam Quinn, POWTS Inspector #665054
715-386-4680
RE: Brent & Sonja Johnson/Country View Construction
Land Information &
Planning CSM #762523 Lots 1, 2, & 3, Section 1, Town of Troy
715-386-4674
On March 16th amended soil reports were submitted for these three lots in
Real Property response to my March 3rd memo that documented deficiencies found during an on-
715-386-4677 site inspection by county staff. Several hours of staff time were required to identify
that there were discrepancies between the final lot line configurations and the
715-386-4675
R reported tested areas, which was in part due to the lack of data provided on the original soil report plot plans. I reviewed the amended reports and comments are
summarized as follows:
Lot 1: The soil report dated 1/25/04 did not have a distance indicated from
Boundary Road, rather it referenced a "proposed east property line". This was
mistakenly assumed to mean the current Lot 1 configuration with Boundary Road
right-of-way as the east lot line, but you submitted a concept map that showed
locations for 2 lots that had been proposed prior to final CSM. I will be happy to
revisit this site to verify data on plot plan that now shows this site is 353 feet west of
road. However, BM#2 is still shown at elevation 106.0' and needs a corrected
elevation for use in construction of a POWTS. As mentioned in previous memo,
Site #1 tested area (soil report dated 10/23/03) had A+0" conditions and would
require a state on-site soil determination for mound design approval. This area was
flagged and still has benchmarks as indicated, although BM #2 elevation is
incorrectly calculated.
Lot 2: Again, I will re-visit the site to verify that your original borings and BM#1 are
visible for POWTS installation purposes. I checked the area north of BM#2 twice on
3/3/06 and found some blue flagging on a tree branch, but could not specifically
locate BM#1 or B1 (59" deep boring) or B2 (50" deep boring). The southerly test pit
and BM#2 shown on the plot plan match the locations of Dave Fogerty's B-2 and
alternate benchmark, the latter "top of PVC pipe" is 23" above grade and should be
higher than the 98.78' elevation reported. Corrected elevation is needed. Dave
Fogerty's soil report extends south of Mary Jo's tested area and allows flexibility in
mound location and design. The site has not been altered and the contours
indicated adequately represent the existing topography.
ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 101 CARMICHAEL ROAD, HUDSON, WI 54016 715-386-4686 FAX
P.%@CO.SAINT-CROIX.WI.US W_WW CO.SAIVTCROIX W1. US
i
Lot 3: The amended plot plan now includes a new hand boring B3 that is approximately 85
feet southeast of your B1. The "existing pit from Fogerty" 131 is shown and Fogerty's original
BM#1 are still included for an assumed 100' elevation. The PVC pipe shown as BM#2 was
previously observed and I will verify location of new B3 in relation to the staked north lot line.
Upon completion of corrected elevations for alternate benchmarks and data verification, these
soil reports should be acceptable for use in POWTS design. It is not uncommon for proposed
lot configurations to change after soil testing has been completed, but review of submitted soil
reports and on-site inspections help county staff identify discrepancies before plumbers use
the data for POWTS designs. It is not always obvious (on paper) that the tested area(s) may
not meet code requirements. Anytime more than one soil report is completed for a parcel,
especially if there is overlap in the tested areas, errors and/or confusion of the data are
possible. In this case, referencing another soil tester's data without properly identifying that
two different borings were used caused additional confusion regarding site conditions. All
borings and site reference data must be identified and elevations must be correlated using one
primary benchmark. Even though it created extra work for both the soil tester and county, it's
good that the request for site condition verification was made early enough to identify and
correct problems prior to POWTS design and installation.
Stating or documenting observations made as a result of site condition verification is
necessary so that any errors or discrepancies can be corrected. If data can't be readily
confirmed at the site based on the soil report plot plan and soil descriptions, it's the
government unit's (county) responsibility to notify all parties and obtain necessary clarification
and/or corrections. Nobody wants to discover errors after a POWTS has been designed using
incorrect soil report data. The focus here is to provide the landowner and prospective buyers
with viable soil reports for each lot in the CSM.
ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 10 1 CARMICHAEL ROAD, HUDSON, Wi 54016 715-386-4686 FAX
P7PC0 SAINT CROIX.WI.US WWW.CO.SAINT-CROIX. WI.US
RECEIVED
' ~TER'S SOIL TESTING MAR 1 6 2006
Mary Jo Hollister
'19875 690`h Avenue ST. CROIX COUNTY
ver Falls, WI 5402-_v,
'71 5) 426 - 1775
13 March 2006
Pam Quinn
St. Croix County Planning & Zoning
St. Croix County Government Center
1 101 Carmichael Road
Hudson, WI 54016
Dear Pam;
A FAX memo was received at my office on 03 March 2006 regarding soil reports
submitted in January 2004 for Brent and Sonja Johnson. This memo was a
waste of taxpayer's monies. A phone call to this soil tester since there were
difficulties locating soil borings could have cleared this up immediately. A copy
of the memo was also sent to the owners that hired me to complete the job.
This memo appears to apply that the job was not complete. The only problem
that there appears to be is that property lines were not established at the time
the soil testes were conducted and they are not exactly were they were
determined by the developer and had been changed between the times the
tests were conducted.
I am a licensed professional that has been licensed for almost 18 years and
have been in business successfully for 10 years. I take my license and business
very seriously along with the health of the public and groundwater of the State.
Also referenced in the memo were soil pits that were excavated that was not
found by the Inspector and it was insinuated that maybe they were not
completed as reported. This is slander to my character and reputation. We are
supposed to be working as a team, not as suspicious characters.
These lots were discussed at the time the job was being conducted with Kevin
Graubau, who was out on the site initially with Leroy Jansky because I did find
the three pits that were left open. It was discussed if a County on-site was
required and it was determined that if the soils were similar to the open pits
that it was not required. These reports were also reviewed before lot approval.
It seems a little redundant to have three personnel members reviewing the
same reports.
I have spent another 3 %Z hours reviewing the site and paperwork. Here are the
facts and findings and revisions to the reports:
Page 2 - Property Owned by Brent and Sonja Johnson, Town of Troy
LOT 1: Two tested sites are on this lot. They were not located correctly on the
engineering/surveying map as my paperwork showed proposed lot lines that
were changed. Site #1 completed in 2003 was located on your site visit.
Apparently you had the paperwork for site #2 that was completed in 2004.
That site was reported correctly based on proposed lot lines at that time. I
have submitted the current lot lines.
LOT 2: The lot line between Lot 2 and Lot 3 has been established. The borings
completed by this soil tester in 2004 on Lot 2 were excavated based on the
north boring from the report submitted by Fogerty. They were flagged and
clearing evident. You mentioned two pits excavated to 59" and 50" - I do not
have any paperwork with pits excavated to those depths. A revised plot plan
has been submitted with the new lot line reported.
LOT 3: The lot line has been established and is approximately 40 feet south of
the proposed lot line that was established at the time my tests were conducted.
Borings were located and another boring has been completed to extend the
system area due to the new location of the lot line.
Respectfully submitted,
MaryJo Hollister, CST 224832
Cc: Brent and Sonja Johnson
ST CRO~X COU
PLA NNul `III ZO1 X111 `III
MEMO
DATE: March 3, 2006
To: Mary Jo Hollister, CST #224832
Code Administration FROM: Pam Quinn, POWTS Inspector #665054
715-386-4680
Land Information RE: Brent & Sonja Johnson CSM lots 1, 2, & 3, Section 1, Town of Troy
& Planning 1;~ . `7
715-386-4674 As a result of queries by a prospective buyer for lots 2 or 3, 1 conducted a
site inspection to determine accuracy of data provided in soil reports prepared for
Real Property these three lots on Certified Survey Map #762523. Based on my findings, the only
715-386-4677 currently viable soil report for use in the design of a POWTS was done by Dave
R Fogerty in September 2003, whose tested area is entirely on lot 3. Findings are
Recycling
715-386-4675 summarized as follows:
Lot 1: located one tested area from soil report dated 10/23/03, which had A+0"
conditions and would require a state on-site soil determination for mound design
approval. This area was flagged and still has benchmarks as indicated, although
BM #2 elevation is incorrectly calculated. A different tested area was described on
a soil report dated 1/25/04 in the northeast corner of the lot. BM#1 is shown as 115'
west of Boundary Rd. and 120' south of the north lot line, with three excavated
backhoe test pits within 90 feet of it. There are no markers or visible backfilled pits
to identify this area and the slope shown on the report is reversed from the
topography I observed. Until the site on the more recent report can be identified
and the data verified by county staff, no sanitary permits can be issued for this lot.
Lot 2: Dave Fogerty's soil report for this lot was done prior to CSM; all three test
pits and both benchmarks are still visible and the elevations using BM#1 as
assumed 100' elevation were found to be accurate. This site had an on-site
completed by Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce, who agreed that a mound or at-
grade system was feasible based on soil conditions. The site has not been altered
and the contours indicated adequately represent the existing topography. Your
subsequent soil report (5/5/04) utilized one of Dave's test pits and indicated that the
south lot line had been staked by owner. The official surveyed lot line and corner
stake are farther south than the flagged lathe that appears to be the owner's
marker. The southerly test pit and BM#2 shown on the plot plan match the location
and elevations of Dave Fogerty's B-2 and alternate benchmark of 2„ PVC pipe,
which are 145 ft. north of the south lot line. I could not locate your backhoe test pits
B1 or B2, or BM#1 that are indicated as north of Dave's test pit.
ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 10 1 CARM/CHAEL ROAD, HUDSON, WI 54016 715-386-4686 FAx
f'I(~C(.~..`.~ A I N_"I_"-C F201 X. W I J5, WWW CO SAINT-C ROIX. WI. US
Lot 3: You used an "existing pit from Fogerty" marked B1 on this report and Dave's original
BM#1 as your assumed 100' elevation. However, the north lot line is 50 feet farther south than
your plan shows; there is a surveyor's stake and lathe marked "lot 2" at the SW lot corner for
reference. I found the 1" PVC pipe shown as BM#2 on the plot plan and the elevations/slope
data appear correct, but no visible sign of hand borings or markers indicating B1 and B2
locations. This soil report is not useable since two of the three test pits are not on this lot.
Although your soil reports for lots 2 & 3 make it look like only one of Dave's test pits was
utilized, the data indicate that you mapped tested areas using both his B-1 and B-2. Your test
pits excavated to 59" and 50" on the lot 2 report should have resulted in backfill material or
other disturbance that would be at least as visible as the exposed test pits from Fogerty's soil
report. I re-visited the site to try and locate these pits without success. Neither your Lot 2 or
Lot 3 soil reports will be accepted for use in POWTS design or sanitary permit issuance.
A copy of this memo will be attached to the soil reports and sent to the owners. Notify the
zoning office when Lot 1 and Lot 3 soil reports have been completed so staff can verify that
they can be released to plumbers for POWTS design.
}
ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 101 CARMICHAEL ROAD, HUDSON, WI 54016 715-386-4686 FAX
P%(?CC) SAINT-C_ROIX.WI.US_
WWW.CO.SAINT-C ROIXWI.US
i ,
WiscorktinDepwtmentofComxrarce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page I of
Division of Safety and Buildings
in accordance with Comm 85, Vft. Adm. Code
County St. Croix
Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 &ucas in size. Plan must
Indude, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), dire Parcel I.D. 70 -0 7 S
percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance t re
Please prlW ap inliornadon. P/11 R Date
Personal Intormexon you provide may be urged for secondary Purposes (Pdvacy Low, s. 0 / U
Property Owner Property Location S<C
Country View Construction (Brent & Sonja Johnson) Lot SE 1K NE 114 S 1 18 N R 19 a
Property Owner's Mang Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM#
499 Country View Road 3 (Po g) /'1Z C~0
City side 21p code Phone Number Ocity mPage • own Nearest Road
Hudson, Wl 54016 715 ) 386 - 2085 Boundary Road
E] New Congi ucdon UseE) Residentla i / Number of bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 600 GPD
Replacement Public or commercial - _
Parent material loess 03M ~ Rood Platri elevation if applicable F y` ~ i y A° r
General oomxrlertts s q
and ecarnr>endations 6 4- Pe ~ MOUND SYSTEM - 0.5 & Sand Fill -0.5 Loading Rate
r
I7L s 2p~,(
~
41
Boring
F71
13 Pit Ground surface elev. 95.14 ft. Depth to limiting factor >40 in. Sol Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Textu s Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDff
in. Mursel Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `011#1 `002
1 0-6 10YR2/2 - rw i 1 3f-mgr mvfr as 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 6-20 10YR3/3 - lr ail 2fsbk mfr as 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
3 20-30 7.5YR3/4 - bk m& es 2vf-co 0.6 1.0
4 30.40 7.5YR3/4 - ls& Ifsbk mvfr - 2v-co 0.7 1.6
(Horizon 3 has some gravel.) -7 1
F-2 Boring # ' ~J~ 99.04 38
❑ P(t G surface elev. it Depth to ifn>ftlng factor in.
SW Application Rode
Horizon Depth Dominard Color Redox Description Texture Structure Corsialenoe Boundary Roots GPDW
in. Munseft Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `01#1 `Etf#2
1 0-6 10YR2/2 - I 3fgr mvfr as 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 6-22 l0YR3/3 - sit 2fabk mfr cs 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
3 22-38 7.5YR3/4 - 81 lfsbk mvfr as 2vf-co 0.6 1.0
4 38-40 7.5YR3/4 fif7.5YR4/4 al lfsbk mvfr - 2vf-co 0.6 1.0
c
(Horizons 3 a 4 have some gravel.) r e
Eftent 01 = BOD > 30 < 220 mglL and TSS >30 < 160 mg& " EMuent 02 m BOD c 30 mg& and TSS S 30 mglL
CST Name (Please Print) - - CST Number
Mary Jo Hollister ti~ f Id\ I/ I W_ z ~ " A 224832
Address Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
W9875 690th Avenue, River Falls, W1 54022 05 - 05 - 04 (715) 426 - 1775
Feb 24 06 09:50a owner 7154264827 p.2
PLOP PLAN P~~?
OWNEJZ: _1~0 • 5 YA • / ~=~/0 ~ hfMF.~ N07~a
~ ~ - N' ~ _ BJb'E
la4e TZ ED J
OF* Jr. sFZ F PVC Ir'c• 5D-'A 0 M
► a-5OL LNG W/ 6 ~
NO COMM M "AX MODUM5
Q= HAA)D
1 S ~RO~os z- So ~+c s
p C.
0 4 ov ~
ate- a- cT Q- ~
Z70
1 IIF~I -mil STIr3c, P►T
q.5V FROM FO(;,C--R1`j 353.01
r
t
5
LJDI
. I
I
I
f
I
Slit
- i r°c
x~
Yowc~xo. a
i
PLOf PLAN p a 2-
O*m vA i,, ` w to m Noreo
6A rvill 9q. aQ
f["J"
A, Qc!5a= 1A s 0.
. 4r
rowf~ Of VC l
- +
--MRW-- QE W1 / (QRtl6tNlJ . j OF
..n
_ 5a"`f No cow 83 s~K,x tMS Z
HAND BORWG
c o 61`.,,,nJ~,~ t~Rp~05~~ Z • Sa
0
ad ol
f 3~ 4~1 ~~X~ S'FIrJ~ P►'T ~
FROM FOfcEKI`{ tiy,53.o1
09 -Z~- 05
i
K r Lin z
v Are, ~ ✓ S rr ~ ~ °;f,Y9 s ov
err` ~
r
f
i
1
i
1
SEC- ~ ~°t ,
~ d
t
1vwr~RD. o ~
~o
FROM JOHNSON FAX NO. : 7153867989 May. 06 2004 09:13AM P1
X4/04 WED 09:11 FAX 715 386 4888 ST CRX CO ZUN1Nt4
~
• 1, 20~~~ ~.IO~M.G w.r. NAIN11 w. t.w.. /FVllh ww ^~1`/
Mach wmple site ~wCon'ipapctV not less a 12 x 11 kxt*s in see- Pw must ®rwe
kKkols. Out %X folu n paint (BW dkeeftn and par~1 t
parou1t bcatim odd Gcsb nod b ncamd road.
j 4G all information. Rewed o"
Fororsr l ►st n ser a awY be aced for soaasdary vuipasm► (Priwoy t air a IS 0~ (11 M~
PropertyQww wP 4►lAa~faA
LL GVA Lot Ug Ve IA 'S T N R a E WV
Rwww owwx &bioifg "mass six* p Srbd. Nance or Csw
J s-l -vv. LUrv YO 4VICS
G Sbde code Flog e matm a ca r ❑ vaw wom Named Imad
02 I /S1 7 2 vaao
Q- New Oorskudos Lim C~ ResidanM I t~har~i of bodrwm _ Code do! desiprt low read _ ~Po GPo
OParont~_S'Awr i .t: Flow, win 4_auon if "Acabla s
C,enetal rosarto
S4tf ,rWt) hrswN* ar&#l799l,44q l # pit Grwrd mdx* dew. ~v rY L Dg vm to Mir9 faclor 'x• ez Atpiuaw► Rafe -lye popth pm*unM coiw Re~orc oespip(m Tax%"
Si~roM/e Con*%m o 8oandary Roots GPON
hL twesal Qu. SF- cost color Gr. Sr- Se. 'ECJi1 'EMR2
s
m L .r ~lr 4A SG
3 .s ' S4 c sd
:lie
COMA
l.~ pct 4and suriuee ele~r. Il D"o b insl6V radar ja IR Soi /►apgoevn tints
FL-x] any
i kmkw Depm Derrdnattt odw Radon Desrxlpiow fexk n sesseus t]orrsistrl+ee tlaar~+rr Roots GPDAV
K weasel CkL SZ Cant. coat Cu. Sz_ sk ~lpl1 rElf~
V2
y-,z2 r rz c G
f-
OVA
• ~ . B a ~ < 2~D and YSS >]0 c 19D tnpll " i~ = t)0O~ = a0 ~t arr0 T55 i ~ - .
Ellua+t OQ. ntp!t-
IST (Please Pkln4 r~ CST Number
~ d
T 1e
Address Fogcrty Plumbing & Perk T "vg Daft evolo w cAnamw
f S
28288 McKeraie Ftd-
FROM JOHNSON FAX NO. : 7153867989 May. 06 2004 09:13AM P2
04/04 WED 09:11 FAX 715 386 4686 ST CRX CO ZONING Lei uu4
PraPWW Owner Ptlroel ID It
it page a
! ;J V ph lltoundsi~y~oe 6kw. ~tf - L DeP& b finTsp tedw
tiaAaoR ~PP-2 ~ paaorprrt Sbi
ir. lrlutee~etl Re+dun Te~►aw SYearlta0 COtFr>~ehea Bowery (iocl6 t;PDtll~
t]u SL Cnnl Qptw a- ss_ ML
.Z.
Cse/
❑ e°""°" ° Racing
Vol wr c area a ate,- De"h a ineifap tatBx ~ lq
Harftert DOP6 pomkold Ra4wct]eeeitplon TaaAas m 5oi Rata
!h lYtuiat! C SAC, QgrM. Ctilor er. SE SA ~ Bcmdory ltaoLt SIR
"Fall
r
F~ . pm to d,.~,d staeaoede,►_ ~ 8
w txp.e to ti rAng bow
t10nb=e Role
Redw Degg"" TWA" sbwdm Coftddwxm
~Y ii0uts
C S - cam Cotbr Or. s. 9i -EX2
E etX N1= 80p~ > 30;S = AV& and TS8 i30 < 1$0 myL • ENkran Art -40D. ! 30 myl avid T33 c 30 nV&
The Dopu lment orCommcrcc is in cQcol opportunity scmicc provider and amployet, ifyov nerd assistance to Acros sarvica or
need material in an alternate format. Please contsa the deparm"t at 0801611M Of `lY 608-264.8777.
seo.nwpUW"
FROM JOHNSON FAX NO. 7153867989 May. 06 2004 09:14AM P3
* M,/04/04 WED 09:11 FAX 715 386 4636 ST CRX CO ZONING
Fogerty PlembiAg
#221180
28288 McKenzie Rd.
Spooner, Wl 54801,
(715) 638-9609
PLC c&v
d 44a
`a. 40;rdws 1 a-~
3'1C~fic' /r~.~3►'
111 / = nr®~
aGlrc ,c'
Q6.t ~ BMA Tyr ~ .g ~~rG 9j ~
' - lee
Caw
g 3
2
IM
3
Lo,
r
I
i
I
1 320 ooc L R. 19 W. R 18 W
0 RPB JeeS r:~m N Fe S e+O~Se AinC2 t B +y ~r
JsB w w S(- v Deb
44
4 ls_:...~' a6 Y ,1 s x tl B , z tee'-~ kx.`s'>.
s SaC
e 7 DERMA Sa
`i SETTLEMEi'Ya 'S -CAI t Y l,: ,.R f `t~'~ M 86
57' 'tCEMETERY' ~R ; S• , ; ae M8
a ~
LL _ . - nom,,,
8 r Etn -
C y' Y /.y ~r2 wy'T R ~Y r h 4
A~ Sa6^~
j MaB. ter. i, V
v a k :SaBON i DAB ~ „ +A :Xr
DtB
-r S r Via`; VaB ?y "S
4
SaB
.
r.Df6 r
FoB t Fob \ r
00 03
+ o ~MaB
DeC2 ,DeC2 ~6~ _
H uA C} d A
~r{ Y Deb a~.
MaB°~ .
2~
cF DeB
5 t7a ie v b~ DeC2. Sa6 v v
1y E
r tE \
¢ .~f ♦~n ) .~i"I O,e ~t l'# °~^L,it 't 'i 0., . t .
B ft S t' F.
W rx r Sa6
r.
,;~R; B fi k, i f *~py a i SaC2
a 1 ~ `-x, 1;"~' R8C2 4 tr ' Na t a@G Ma8 ~ *M.
Y ~
B " S VIEC'
DeB ~~a rff$ ° +irr ~Y
F~ ~ air 1~w~X. 4
FoC2 u: ~ i ~ ~•~J ~ f SaC2, ~
t.
Ry. ` }n v Y t,n
DfS
* II
7 ~tP o Qo0 OtD ~4q OtD
A'
RoEl