Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout018-2017-12-000 { V'isoonsin Department Commerce PRIVATE County: Safety and Building Divi VATE SEWAGE SYSTEM on $t. Croi INSPECTION REPORT Sanitar Permit No: GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) 538739 Personal information you provide maybe used for seconds State Plan ID No: secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Parcel Tax No: CS T B B M er ,Matthew &Nicole Hammond, Town of 018- 2017 -12 -000 M El ev: Insp. BM Elev: BM Description: n /� Sectionlrown /Range/Map No: TANK INFORMATION /� /� 35.29.14.1133 MANUFACTURER ELEVATION DATA TYPE • '� f CAPACITY S TION BS HI FS ELEV. Septic Zh„ '' 3 • 7S /Dl - S Gj � F I i /DaO Benchmark Dosing / �`�� �•8 Lit, P g, A BM �' /J q�• P a Bld . Sewer Holding t7 7 9 s• 3 St/Ht Inlet i/ 2 5 1 14•/ 7 TANK SETBACK INFORMATION St/Ht Outlet / 2 TANK TO ,P /l- /�7' �3 /�� 7� gJ 1Q WELL BLDG. Vent to Air Intake ROAD Dt Inlet Septic /� 75 Dt Bottom 3a 'k �� •5 �6 , g Dosin Header /Man. Aeration :T6 /a/. 'n Dist. Pipe Holding Bot. System , 5. �5 PUMP /SIPHON INFORMATION Final Grade Manufact;Friction 3. 3 Demand St Cover J GPM 3 .16k 16 1. 7 Model Nu �Los - yo 3. 5 �. TDH Lift s System Head TDH Ft Forcemaith / Dia. Dist. to Well / 6 . SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM Z- 22> BED /TRENCH Width Length , No. Of T ch PIT DIMENSIONS No. Of Pits Inside Dia. Liquid Depth DIMENSIONS tl, S leb `_ 77 � � SETBACK SYSTEM TO P/L BLDG WELL INFORMATION LAKE /STREAM LEACHING Manufacturer: _ Type Of System: OJ �s ZZL CHAMB 7 Z50 , t vM i1 T IT O R Model Number: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM r / Header /Manifold // Distribution Pi �� g a Pipe (s) ,/p / / • / / x Hole Size � Hol e Spacing Ven to Air Intake Length 2J' 2•ZS g ? /•Z Dia ZJ g Z.ZS / 5( G / Spacin / ✓ C SOIL COV x Pressure Systems Only xx Mound Or At - Grade Systems Only Depth Over Depth Over xx Depth of Bed/Trench Center Bed/Trench Edges To soil Seeded /Sodded xx Mulc . Z3 ed � P 1 ` � : .` • Yes E No COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies, persons present, etc.) Inspection #1: 1Z- Inspection #2: _ L Location: 1910 66th Ave. Baldwin, WI 54002 S 1/4 NW 1/4 35 T29N R17W) Croix Hills Lot 12 a F• T I 'S _ •` �O J 1 Parcel No: 35.29.14.1133 1.) Alt BM Description = / 2.) Bldg sewer length = `% L i s,_� 3 - amount of cover = 37/ � aw Plan revision Required? Yes No Use other side for additional infon i n. �� I / na e SBD -6710 (R.3/97) Date Insepctor's Si J L. 4 g Cert. No. n cn o j ■ n c \ \ \� \ � ■ E 7 § f z T= z \ Ln < I w o $ �, & Cl) o ° :'° ® + / k ƒ j i \ ] / ` � ° 7 \ S &_ ) ° : m ca L — 2 \ ( ƒ \ :E / § \ p 8 m \ 0 / V y E E H CL \ 7 7 0 \ §E ® / # »: o § » n r CO) CD ° § k ƒ, � g r-3 22 k ... CL o v i j x Q (D d 2 u (D ,—�o > > o Ea E . # 22 £ CL - / � }d �_ { E \ \ 2 z $ CD r m E ( f ( \ § q n / . k \ \ § ® ■ /$ E§ �z - � k 0 / SID -. 0 f -, § \ 22E E \ i CD [ ƒ -0 z R s\ /eƒ CD \ f m » ECE7 ® JEi , $o § \ , 0 gym j ƒ .£20 j FD' !£0E j a .� ƒ »f \ { 0 j j A / f \ § commerc .wi. gov Safety and Buildings D n County t 201 W. Washington Ave., P. 0 67� e— i sco n s i � n Madison, WI 53707 -716 i i ry Permit Number be filled in by Co.) Department of Commerce , t Sanitary Permit A lication to Transaction Number In accordance with s. Comm. 83.21(2), Wis. Adm. Code, submissio of this f o e e gove mental unit is required prior to obtaining a sanitary permit. Note: Ap ication� f t��d PO S are Project Address (if different than mailing address) submitted to the Department of Commerce. Personal informati you provide may be used for se ndary p urposes in accordance with the Privacy Law, s. 15.04 1 (m), Stats. SY. CROIX COUNTY Y L Application Info rmation — Please Print All Informatio ` PLANNING & ZONIN / /o 66 WV Baca Property Owner's N a m e Parcel # V 0l0 0 � a -0 - 0 Property Owner's Mailing Address Property Location j 3 ?J l X17 �1_ Code Phone Number Govt. Lot City, State Zip 5 l- '' - A /l1 l ' / <, Section - 35 - Ci ucle one II. Type of Building (check all that apply) Lot # T N; R Eoe 1 or 2 Family Dwelling — Number of Bedrooms / Subdivision Name ZYtcj - Ptrr- --Ok lock# ❑ Public /Commercial - Describe U ❑ City of ❑ State Owned - Describe Use CSM Number ❑ Village of Town of /T III. Type of Permit: (Check only one box on line A. Complete line B if applicable) A. New System ❑ Replacement System ❑ Treatment/Holding Tank Replacement Only ❑ Other Modification to Existing System (explain) B. ❑ Permit Renewal ❑ Permit Revision ❑ Change of Plumber El Permit Transfer to New List Previous Permit Number and Date Issued Before Expiration Owner l f— IV. Type of POWTS System/Component/Device: Check all that a 1 j ❑ Non - Pressurized In- Ground ❑ Pressurized In- Ground ❑ At -Grade ❑ Mound ? 24 in. of suitable soil Mound < 24 li of suitable soil El Holding Tank El Other Dispersal Component (explain) ❑Pretreat ent Device (e plain) V. Di s ersal/ I reatment Area Information: Design Flow (gpd) Des ign Soil Application Rate(gpd 5 sf) Dispersal Area Require (sf) Dispersal Area Propo d (so System Elevation / o_ ► • O, Z ti', ` j G � �0 225a o 5 3 IM. O VI. Tank Info Capacity in Total I V of Manufacturer Gallons Gallons Units o New Tanks Existing Tanks y p 0 2 a. U v� Septic or Holding Tank 0 O Dosing Chamber / ^K L � VII. Responsibility Statement I, the undersigned, assume responsibility for installation of the POW TS own on the attached plans. Plumber's Name (Print) Plumber' natur PRS Number Business Phone Number Plumber's Address (Street, City, State, Zip Code) X / VIII ount /De artment Use Onl Approved ❑ Disapproved Permit Fee 00 ra Date Issued Issuing Agent Sign lure El Given Reason for Denial & 2 b . � /� y /� Viivrrl v IX. &gq4pp1 "44oval/Reasons for Disapproval � 1 Septic tank, effluent filter and 5 .: dispersal cell must all be serviced /maintained as per management plan provided by plumber. ��-4� d?� !mod 2. All setback requirements must be maintained �C , !I as per app I tt e s or the system and submit to the unty only n pa er not less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches JQ�j /3 �-- m: T 12 4P7 SB -6398 (R. 2/09) Valid thru 02/11 4—t J L07 iv - n ,� a�c�- A PIA 12/08/2010 14:07 FAX. 17152632267 �- IA 002 /005 $ r CL i cn w u % �a c / ♦� .Q qr 11 Ir is V Co i v y - _ a ;.k � � C •� o� o Z 11 Nk M _ O o PW 4106E V Safety and Buildings 10541N RANCH ROAD commerce HAYWARD WI 54843 N Contact Through Relay i sco n s i n w ww.commerc e.w i.gov/sb/ www.wisco isconsin.gov Department of Commerce Jim Doyle, Governor Aaron Olver, Secretary December 10, 2010 CUST ID No. 220357 ATTN.• POWTS Inspector BRADY J UTGARD ZONING OFFICE UTGARD PLUMBING & HEATING ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA PO BOX 413 1101 CARMICHAEL RD AMERY WI 54001 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 12/10/2012 Identificat' bers Transaction ID . 1883798 SITE: Site ID No. 713333 New Horizon Homes Please refer to both identification numbers, 1910 66TH Ave & 190TH St above, in all correspondence with the agency. Town of Hammond, 54002 St Croix County SWI /4, NW1 /4, S35, T29N, R17W Subdivision: Croix Hills Subdivision FOR: Description: Mound, 3 bedroom residence P'di�ld Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1291439 CQTt Maintenance required; 450 GPD Flow rate; 6 in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade; Sys Mound Component Manual - Version 2.0, SBD- 10691 -P (N.01 101); Effluent Filter p NJ � J M �Nj a SAFET The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes 0 and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with any component manual(s) referenced above. CQRRE The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code SEE requirements. No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per s.145.06, stats. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: Key Item(s) • In the event this soil absorption system or any of its component parts malfunctions so as to create a health hazard, the property owner must follow the contingency plan as described in the approved plans. In addition, the owner must insure that the operation, maintenance and monitoring duties as described in section VIII of the mound component manual are complied with. A copy of this information must be given to the owner upon completion of the project. • The float switch shall be a type that does n contain mercury. 20 09 Wisconsin Act 44 prohibits the installation of float switches or relays that contain mercury. • This plan approval is based on and in accordance with the approval for Interpretive Determination, Transaction #1275364. 'All conditions of approval for the Interpretive Determination shall be adhered to. • Chisel plow to a depth of 12 " -16 ". • The maximum finished slope of the mound surface shall not have a slope ratio steeper than 4:1. • The proposed pump is near its limit with the proposed total dynamic head. If upon installation, the total dynamic head increases, the proposed pump must be reevaluated and may be inadequate. BRADY J UTGARD Page 2 12/10/2010 • The designer proposes to install a state approved effluent filter to achieve the requirement of wastewater particle size. Pursuant to outlet filter product approval stipulations, maintenance information must be given to the owner of the POWTS explaining that periodic cleaning of the effluent filter is required. The access opening used to service the filter shall terminate at or above finished grade with a watertight cover. Reminder • The orientation of the mound system must be such that the longest dimension is oriented along the surface contour per COMM 83.44(6)(a)2. • Limit activities in the area 15' beyond the down slope edge of the mound per Mound Component Manual. • Surface water drainage shall be diverted away from the system area per Mound Component Manual. • Materials shall conform to the requirements of COMM 84. • Maintain well and waterline set backs per COMM 83.43(8)(1). Consult the Department of Natural Resources for well setbacks and other regulations and exceptions. • Insulate building sewer per COMM 82.30(11)(c). • Provide frost protection per COMM 83.43(8)(c). A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /installation/operation. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter and the POWTS management plan to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS. S ly, Fee Required $ 250.00 Fee Received $ 250.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Patricia handorf - POWTS Plan Re ie , Integrated Services WiSMART code: 7633 (715) 634 -7810, Fax: (715) 634-5150, M -fr 8:00 - 4:45 pat.shandorf@wisconsin.gov cc: Leroy G Jansky, POWTS Wastewater Specialist, (715) 828-5902, Monday, 7:00 A.M. To 3:30 P.M. Notice: Starting July 1, 2009, no person or entity may engage or offer to engage in construction business in Wisconsin unless they hold a Building Contractor Registration, or equivalent, issued by the Safety and Buildings Division of the Wisconsin Department of Commerce. "Construction business" means a trade that installs, alters or repairs any building element, component, material or device that is regulated under the commercial building code, chs. Comm 60 to 66, the uniform dwelling code, chs. Comm 20 to 25, the electrical code, ch. Comm 16, the plumbing code, chs. Comm 81 to 87, or the public swimming pools and water attractions code, ch. Comm 90. The term does not include the delivery of building supplies or materials, or the manufacture of a building product not on the building site. For further information, go to our website: www.commerce.wi. gov/ SB/ SB- BuildingContractorPro�ram.html MOUND AND PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT DESIGN INDEX AND TITLE PAGE Project Name: NEW HORIZON HOMES Owner's Name: NEW HORIZON HOMES Owner's Address: 1475HWY. 65 1910 66TH_ AVE. Legal Description: SW /NW /S35/T29/R17W Township: HAMMOND County: ST. CROIX Subdivision Name: CROIX HILLS Lot Number: 12 Block Number. Parcel I.D. Number: 10- 322 -0200 ally Plan Transaction No.: t t AN Page 1 Index and title Page 2 Data entry N Page 3 Mound drawings 3pp140E Page 4 Lateral and dose tank Page 5 System maintenance specifications /1 Page 6 Management and contingency plan Page 7 Pump curve and specifications Page 8 PLOT PLAN Page 9 SITE LAY -OUT Page 10 SOIL TEST Designer: BRADY UTGARD License Number: 220357 Date: 12/0)40 1 Phone Number: 715 - 268 -6995 Signature: Designed Pursuant to the Mound Component Manual for POWTS Version 2.0 SDB- 10691 -P (N. 01/01), and SSWMP Publication 9.6 Design of Pressure Distribution Networks for ST -SAS (01/81) Version 3.11 R. 06/01 Page 1 of 1 ag 0 12/08/2010 14:08 FAX 17152632267 1005/005 Mound and Pressure Distribution Component Design Site Information R Residential or Commercial Design Not- sand lB (D) dilations assume a 300.00 Estimated Wastewater Flow (gpd) Table 83 -44-3 in -situ sod treatment for fecal 1.50 Peaking Factor (e.g. 1.5 =150%) col0brin of `= 36 mom' 450.00 Design Flow (gpd) 4.50 Site Slope ( %) 97.80 Contour Line Elevation (ft) Depth to Limiting Factor (in) 0.20 In -s'du Soll Application Rate (g pd/fl ? ) Distribution Cell Information 100.00 Dispersal Cell Length Along Contour (ft) = 4.50 Cell Width (ft) 1.00 Dispersal Cell Design Loading Rate (gpd/fl?) 1 Influent Wastewater Quality (1 or 2) Are the laterals the highest point in the distribution Y Pressure Disribution Information network? c Center or End Manifold 2.25 Lateral Spacing (ft) If N above, enter the elevation (ft) 4 Number of Laterals of the highest point. 0.156 Orifice Diameter (in) (e.g. 0.25) 2.65 Orifice Spacing (ft) = 5.92 felorifice 2.00 Forcemain Diameter (in) 200.00 Forcemain Length (ft) Does the forcemain drain back? Y 90.00 Pump Tank Elevation (ft) 4.55 System Head (ft) x 1.3 32.62 Foncemain Drainback (gal) 10.30 Vertical Lift (ft) 62.71 5x Void Volume (gal) 6.89 Friction Loss (ft) 95.33 Minimum Dose Volume (gal) .74 Xotal Dynamic Head (ft) 40.93 System Demand (gpm) Lateral Diameter Selection Manifold Diameter Selection in. dia. options choice in. dia. options I choice 0.75 1.25 x X 1.00 1.50 x 1.25 x X 2.00 x 1.50 x 3.00 2.00 x 3.00 x Gallonslinch Calculator Treatment Tank Information 600.00 Total Tank Capacity (gal) 1000.00 Septic Tank Capacity (gal) 38.00 Total Working Liquid Depth (in) weiser Manufacturer 15.79 gal/in (enter result in cell B49) Does Tank Information Effluent Filter information 600.00 Dose Tank Capacity (gal) POLYLOC Filter Manufacturer 15.79 Dose Tank Volume (gal/in) 525 Filter Model Number weiser Manufacturer Project: NEW HORIZON HOMES Page 2 of 10 12/08/2010 14:07 FAX 17152632267 Q004/005 Mound Plan View t 1� 1 B �Observafion pipe . - K . T' ' ' ' ' ' ♦ i O . .a .. A }. L Mound Component Dimensions A 4.50 ft E 32.43 in H 1.00 ft K gift ft B 100.00 ft F 9.25 in I 18.00 ft L ft D 30.00 in G 0.50 ft J 9.97 ft W 450.00 (fl?) Dispersal Cell Area 1 2250.00 (ft) Basal Area Available 4.50 (gpd/ft) Linear L Rate 10.00 (ft) 1/10-B Obs. Pipe Placement Mound Cross Section View Aggregate Dispersal Area Finished Grade 102.07 (ft) --► rrrrrriri 2 rrrrrrr G F Dispersal Cell 100.80 (ft) Lateral 100.30 invert =p Elevation E 97.80 (ft) Contour Elevation 4.5 % Site Slope Geotex6fe Fabric Cover Shading Key Dispersal Cell See lateral details on Q Q Topsoil Cap 1.5 ft Page 4 for number, size, . Q rrrrr Subsoil Cap N o 0 O /Q T and spacing of laterals. e /�STM C33 Sand :6 F Laterals are equally Q Tilled Layer ar 0.5 ft Typical Lateral spaced from the Q Aggregate .r Q c ce irs #w centerline in the A distribution cell (AxB). ProJect: NEW HORIZON HOMES , Page 3 of .10 12/08/2010 14:07 FAX 17152632267 IM003/005 Center Connection Lateral Layout Daigrarn Force mal n conrwotion +rfa DFe w crass to mardfald at any point. Labrats are ldentic a1 I P S • "Turn- upwPball valve or �X- -�JEd2 af2�1 aleanoutplug 1 Lat:.,ds & force main of PVC $ch 40 HOWs &W an the bottom of the lateral Par tx7MM Tats 84 38.'f Number of Laterals 41 Orifice Diameter 0.156 in Lateral Diameter 1,25 In Orifice Spacing X Lateral Length (P) 48.21 ft Orifices p 9 () 2.86 ft Lateral spacing per Lateral 19 pa g S �) 2.25 ft Orifice Density 5.92 fe /orifice Lateral Flow Rate 10.23 gpm Manifold Length 2.25 ft System Flow Rate 40.93 gpm Manifold Diameter 1,25 in Total Dynamic Head 21.74 ft Forcemain Velocity 4,18 ft/sec Dose Tank information Locking cover with wamirV Mal and knddng device and Electrical as per NEC 300 and ----► sealed watertight Comm 16.28 WAC 4 in. min. Disconnect Tank component is propedy vented Alternate outlet location Forcemain diameter Weiser Manufacturer X. 2 in. Ca peel .600.00 Gallons Volume 15.79 gal/inch A Weep hole or anti. Dimension Inches Gallons B siphon device A 23.96 378.35 C B 2.00 31.58 _t P�off elevation ft C 6.04 95.33 90,50 D 6.00 94.741 D Total 38.00 600.00 iF Dose tank elevation R) 3" Bedding uncler tank. I 80.00 Alarm Manuafacuurer LEVEL Alarm Model Number DLV Pump Manufacturer GOULDS Pump Model Number WE05H Pump Must Deliver I 40.93 gpm at 21.74 ft TDH Project: NEW HORIZON HOMES C Page 4 of 10 9-,2010 Mound System Maintenance and Operation Specifications Service Provider's Name UTGARD Phone 715 - 268 -6995 POWTS Regulator's Name ST. CROIX Phone 715- 386 -4680 System Flow and Load Parameters Design Flow - Peak 450 gpd Maximum Influent Particle Size 1/8 in Estimated Flow - Average 300 gpd Maximum BOD5 220 mg /L Septic Tank Capacity 1000 gal Maximum TSS 150 mg /L Soil Absorption Component Size 450 ft Maximum FOG 30 mg /L Type of Wastewater Domestic Maximum Fecal Coliform >10E4 cfu /100 mL Service Frequency Septic and Pump Tank Inspect and /or service once every 3 years Effluent Filter Should inspect and clean at least once every 3 years Pump and Controls Test once every 3 years Alarm Should test month) Pressure System Laterals should be flushed and pressure tested every 1.5 years Mound Inspect for ponding and seepage once every 3 years INSPECT FILTER ONCE A YEAR Miscellaneous Construction and Materials Standards 1. Observation pipes are slotted and materials conform to Table Comm 84.30 -1, have a watertight cap, and are secured in as shown in the mound component manual. 2. Dispersal cell aggregate conforms to Comm 84.30 (6)(i), Wis. Adm. Code. 3. All gravity and pressure piping materials conform to the requirements in Comm 84, Wis. Adm. Code. 4. Tillage of the basal area is accomplished with a mold board or chisel plow. 5. The mound structure and other disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to prevent soil erosion and help reduce frost penetration. Lateral Turn -up Detail Finished • ............. ............... Grade 6 -8" Diameter Lawn Threaded Cleanout Sprinkler Valve Box Plug or Ball Valve Distribution Lateral Long Sweep 90 or Two 45 Degree Bends Same Diameter as Lateral Project: NEW HORIZON HOMES Page 5 of 10 i Mound System Management Plan Pursuant to Comm 83.54, Wis. Adm. Code General This system shall be operated in accordance with Comm 82 -84 Wis. Adm. Code, and shall maintained in accordance with its' component manuals [SBD- 10691 -P (N.01/01) and SSWMP Publication 9.6 (01/81)] and local or state rules pertaining to system maintenance and maintenance reporting. No one should ever enter a septic or pump tank since dangerous gases may be present that could cause death. Septic and pump tank abandonment shall be in accordance with Comm 83.33, Wis. Adm. Code when the tanks are no longer used as POWTS components. Septic or pump tank manhole risers, access risers and covers should be inspected for water tightness and soundness. Access openings used for service and assessment shall be sealed watertight upon the completion of service. Any opening deemed unsound, defective, or subject to failure must be replaced. Exposed access openings greater than 8- inches in diameter shall be secured by an effective locking device to prevent accidental or unauthorized entry into a tank or component. Septic Tank The septic tank shall be maintained by an individual certified to service septic tanks under s. 281.48, Stats. The contents of the septic tank shall be disposed of in accordance with NR 113, Wis. Adm. Code. The operating condition of the septic tank and outlet filter shall be assessed at least once every 3 years by inspection. The outlet filter shall be cleaned as necessary to ensure proper operation. The filter cartridge should not be removed unless provisions are made to retain solids in the tank that may slough off the filter when removed from its enclosure. If the filter is equipped with an alarm, the filter shall be serviced if the alarm is activated continuously. Intermittent filter alarms may indicate surge flows or an impending continuous alarm. The septic tank shall have its contents removed when the volume of sludge and scum in the tank exceeds 1/3 the liquid volume of the tank. If the contents of the tank are not removed at the time of a triennial assessment, maintenance personnel shall advise the owner of when the next service needs to be performed to maintain less than maximum scum and sludge accumulation in the tank. The addition of biological or chemical additives to enhance septic tank performance is generally not required. However, if such products are used they shall be approved for septic tank use by the Department of Commerce. Pump Tank The pump (dosing) tank shall be inspected at least once every 3 years. All switches, alarms, and pumps shall be tested to verify proper operation. If an effluent filter is installed within the tank it shall be inspected and serviced as necessary. Mound and Pressure Distribution System No trees or shrubs should be planted on the mound. Plantings may be made around the mound's perimeter, and the mound shall be seeded and mulched as necessary to prevent erosion and to provide some protection from frost penetration. Traffic (other than for vegetative maintenance) on the mound is not recommended since soil compaction may hinder aeration of the infiltrative surface within the mound and snow compaction in the winter will promote frost penetration. Cold weather installations (October - February) dictate that the mound be heavily mulched as protection from freezing. Influent quality into the mound system may not exceed 220 mg/L BOD 150 mg/L TSS, and 30 mg/L FOG for septic tank effluent or 30 mg /L BOD 30 mg/L TSS, 10 mg/L FOG, and 10 ctu/100 mL for highly treated effluent. Influent flow may not exceed maximum design flow specified in the permit for this installation. The pressure distribution system is provided with a flushing point at the end of each lateral, and it is recommended that each lateral be flushed of accumulated solids at least once every 18 months. When a pressure test is performed it should be compared to the initial test when the system was installed to determine if orifice dogging has occurred and if orifice cleaning is required to maintain equal distribution within the dispersal cell. Observation pipes within the dispersal cell shall be checked for effluent ponding. Ponding levels shall be reported to the owner, and any levels above 6 inches considered as an impending hydraulic failure requiring additional, more frequent monitoring. Continmmcv Plan If the septic tank or any of its components become defective the tank or component shall be repaired or replaced to keep the system in proper operating condition. If the dosing tank, pump, pump controls, alarm or related wiring becomes defective the defective component(s) shall be immediately repaired or replaced with a component of the same or equal performance. If the mound component fails to accept wastewater or begins to discharge wastewater to the ground surface, it will be repaired or replaced in its' present location by increasing basal area if toe leakage occurs or by removing biologically clogged absorption and dispersal media, and related piping, and replacing said components as deemed necessary to bring the system into proper operating condition. See Page 5 of this plan for the name and telephone number of your local POWTS regulator and service provider. Project: NEW HORIZON HOMES Page 6 of 10 V91Lll U%Vur11u�jG W TIMIf I ullr Submerged. Goulds Pumps is 154 9001 Registered. FEET 130 Ei . SERIE5: 3885 120 SIZE: -lie SOLIDS RPM: 3500 & 110 -- 175 --�► 5 GPM - - _ 100 5 FT - -- - . 90 - /0 4 - 60 i - 50 40 30 20 10 00 10 20 30 40 50 50 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 `140 150 160 GPN I I I 1 ,y I I I 1 I i I _I I- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 m- CAPACITY GOLI is Pumps Curve L 0 7e- 12/08/2010 14:07 FAX 17152632267 CJj 002 /005 AOO cm 0 C IJ3 as ZV r O 1 CL � 1 x I x as m C / $ c t r jln t a Elf o J ! I t Q ' S m r $� $ W - a) a 0 z X M � I v � 'o O E. " O O M N t U O o vim v _ -Z E 9 . ia 00 \ urn LL iU) Earl_ CD 11 > Q N Q N c W U n CL- z ; a (� I M �\ M v _O \ Q CO { U w' ^J M \ 11 C j I C q _ o n $ '/ pm,���ll _> / I E /J E Ul _ / r LO v O /) / J 0 xb I m \ \ R \ ' . O \ I O J ,c m�� ���� Co > 'c> :3 j L r 0.0 _ L N O� _ O N TEL N C C f6 D t aMU NL to E N m . L .. .Q ,p 'O N �' U T N I maaviEy° oa °O m o rL a� o m D n 1c m Z a mm tea E °cam 3 \ I c M 11 p !Y ai v Z (n o\ — m � f HlO 03 '!Lu Z'0 o c rn o Z v m 1 � Safety and Buildings �- 13 E SPRUCE STREET commerce.wi.gov CHIPPEWA FALLS WI 54729 r TDD #: (608) 264-8777 /� www.commerce.wi.gov /sb/ t c n s n www.wisconsin.gov Department of Commerce RECEIVED Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary AUG 17 2006 August 03, 2006 ST. CROIX COUNTY CUST ID No. 42258 Inspector ELI M GOTTFRIED GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL ZONING OFFICE 1241/2 GRAHAM AVE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA PO BOX 1645 1101 CARMICHAEL RD EAU CLAIRE WI 54702 -1645 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 08/03/2008 IdenCifi s Transaction ID o. 1275364 SITE: Troy French - French Homes Site ID No. 713333 Town of Hammond, St Croix County Pleasiy refer tti both ideal ifiction:niunbers SW 1/4, NW 1/4, S35, T29N, RI 7W 'abeve;�n all'cgrxxs oidence aiuttb khe a enc ;; Lots: 1, 2, and 8 Subdivision: Croix Hills Subdivision FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1077636 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. The following conditions apply to private onsite wastewater treatment system ( POWTS) design and installation: GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is six inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of six inches of unsaturated, in -situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be < 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate < 4.5 gpd/ft. Down slope toes will be designed using a > 4 :1 ratio rather than the traditional 3:1 to ensure more than adequate basal area is available. 4. Distribution cell orifice density shall be < 6 sf /orifice. 5. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 -16 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 6. Special landscaping (drainage swale) up slope of the mound and/or of the up slope toe of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 7. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. Z y INTERPRETIVE REPORT. RECEIVED JUL 3 1 2006 Gottfried Environmental SAFETY & BUILDINGS 124 Graham Avenue Eau Claire, WI. 54701 715- 833 - 1400; 715- 833 -1381 fax 1275364, for: Troy French French Homes Inc. P.O. Box 350 Roberts, WI. 54023 715 -718 -2929 Site: SW NW 35 29 17W Croix Hills subdivision Hammond, St Croix County Table of Contents Tableof Contents ......................................................................................... ............................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ .................:............. 3 RATIONAL FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT .................................. ............................... 3 GEOLOGICAL HISTORY .......................................................................... ............................... 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE .................................................................... ............................... 5 Lots2, 6, 7, 8, 9 ............................................................................................ ............................... 5 Locations of Proposed Mounds: ................................................................................................. 5 Lot2 ........................................................................................................ ............................... 5 Observations: .......................................................................................................................... 5 Lot2 Discussion: .................................................................................................................... 6 SoilStructure :.......................................................................................... ............................... 6 RedoximorphicFeatures: ........................................................................................................ 6 HighGroundwater: ................................................................................................................. 6 Drainage: ................................................................................................................................. 6 Lot6 ......................................................................................................... ............................... 7 Observations: .......................................................................................................................... 7 Lot6 Discussion: .................................................................................................................... 7 SoilStructure :.......................................................................................... ............................... 7 Redoximorphic Features: ........................................................................................................ 7 HighGroundwater: ................................................................................................................. 7 Drainage: ................................................................................................................................. 7 Lot7 ......................................................................................................... ............................... 7 Observations: .......................................................................................................................... 7 Lot7 Discussion: ............................................................................................. SoilStructure: ......................................................................................................................... 8 Redoximorphic Features: ........................................................................................................ 8 HighGroundwater: ................................................................................................................. 8 Drainage: ............................ f ................................................................................................... 8 Lot8 ......................................................................................................... ............................... 9 Observations: .......................................................................................................................... 9 Lot8 Discussion: .................................................................................................................... 9 SoilStructure :.......................................................................................... ............................... 9 Redoximorphic Features: ........................................................................................................ 9 High Groundwater: .............................................................. ............... 9 Drainage: ................................................................................................................................. 9 Lot9 ......................................................................................................... ............................... 9 Observations: .......................................................................................................................... 9 Lot9 Discussion: .................................................................................................................. 10 SoilStructure: ....................................................................................................................... 10 RedoximorphicFeatures: ...................................................................................................... 10 HighGroundwater: ............................................................................................................... 10 Drainage: ............................................................................................................................... 10 Lots1, 3, 4 (portion) .................................................................................. ............................... 10 1 Locations of Proposed Mounds: ............................................................................................... 10 Lot1 ....................................................................................................... ............................... 10 Observations: ........................................................................................................................ 10 Lot 1 Discussion: 11 SoilStructure :........................................................................................ ............................... 11 RedoximorphicFeatures: ...................................................................................................... 11 HighGroundwater: ............................................................................................................... 11 Drainage: ............................................................................................................................... 11 General Comments Relating to All Four Sites ........................................... ............................... 12 Drainageclass ........................................................................................ ............................... 12 Topographic Considerations .................................................................. ............................... 12 LocalHydrology ....................................... ............................... ................... ........................... 12 AquicMoisture Regime ......................................................................... ............................... 13 Tillage .................................................................................................... ............................... 14 EXPLANATION FOR CURRENT SOIL CONDITIONS ........................ ............................... 14 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SOIL TESTS .......................................... ............................... 15 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................ ............................... 15 PROPOSALS ............................................................................................. ............................... 16 3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate less than or equal to 4.5 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and / or occupancy that can beserviced on the site . ............................................................................................ :..................... 16 4. The basal soil application rate must less than or equal to 0.3 gpsgft per day ....................... 16 5. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C -33 sand must be used under the laterals ............................... 16 6. Chisel plowing must be employed under the absorption area down to a depth of 12 inches 16 7. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches ........................... ............................... 16 8. Slopes down -slope of the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3. This increases thetoe absorption area ................................................................................... ............................... 16 9. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to divert water around the mounds, unless the mound is to located at — or near - the crest of the topographic high. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water from being trapped in the mounds. Alternatively, the mound can be constructed so that the "J" slope is wider in the center of the mound so that water is diverted to either side ........................... ............................... 16 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... ............................... 21 2 GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL 124 Graham Ave., Eau Claire, W154701; 715 -833 -1400 telephone: 715 - 833 -1400; fax: 715- 833 -1381; email: elicstmnu,sbcglobal.net INTERPRETATIVE REPORT 14 March 2006; Revised 19 July 2006 based on the recommendations of Leroy Jansky, Wastewater Specialist for the State of Wisconsin Proper owner: French Homes Inc. Legal Description: SW NW 35 29 17W Hammond, St. Croix County INTRODUCTION From 1 December to 6 December 2005, soil evaluations were conducted by me on the property described above. The soil evaluations were done in response to a request by the soil tester, Mr. David Steel of Steel Soil Testing Services, in order to determine the suitability f the evaluated lots for the construction of on -site wastewater treatment systems. The sites in question all displayed redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the Ap horizon. This feature, according to Wisconsin Administrator Code, does not allow for the construction of a standard POWTS. Instead, it requires that it be determined that seasonal saturation does not extend into the Ap horizon. It is the intention of the property owner(s), French Homes Incorporated, to subdivide this 40 Acre (approximate) portion of land into 18 lots. Of the 18 lots, 5 have been reviewed as A +0 mound sites. RATIONAL FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT High and low chroma features in the soil as compared with matrix soil colors are considered as indicators of seasonal saturation in the State of Wisconsin. Department of Commerce Comm 81.01 (118) states: "High groundwater" means zones of soil saturation which include perched water tables, shallow regional groundwater tables or aquifers, or zones that are seasonally, periodically or permanently saturated. Comm 81.01 (119) further defines evidence of seasonal saturation in the soils: "High groundwater elevation" means the higher of either the elevation to which the soil is saturated when observed as a free water surface, or the elevation to which the soil has been seasonally or periodically saturated as indicated by the highest elevation of redoximorphic features in the soils. At least 36 inches of soil separation is required between the bottom of the soil absorption system 3 ` / r and the redoximorphic soil features in most types of soils (Table 83.44 -3, Department of Commerce). Where this does not exist, an above ground SAS must be constructed (i.e. mound or At- Grade). The initial determination of this site has found the site to be unsuitable for mound tYP P e septic systems (Soil Absorption System), as per WAC Comm 85.30(2)(a) and (b). This code section mandates that: 1. Redoximorphic features be used as an indicator of seasonal saturation in the soils. 2. Redoximorphic features appearing at depths of within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon shall be interpreted as seasonal saturation occurring at ground surface ( "Unless determined otherwise..., the highest elevation of seasonal soil saturation shall be the ground surface where redoximorphic features are present within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon. ") Although Comm 85.30(2)(b) mandates that redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the A horizon be interpreted as seasonal saturation to ground surface, Comm 85.60(2)(a) allows for an interpretive determination of the soil conditions and depth to seasonal saturation should this condition exist. This section states in t st part. "A written report by a certified soil tester evaluating and interpreting redoximorphic soil features ... may be submitted to the department in lieu of high groundwater determination data. The written report shall conclusively demonstrate that the existing soil morphological features or color patterns are not indicative of current conditions of periodic soil saturation." This is the basis for the current report. GEOLOGICAL HISTORY The subsurface formation in St. Croix County consists of the Prairie Du Chien Group (dolomite and sandy dolomite). Depth to bedrock ranges from 0 - 15 meters (Brown, B.A. (1988)). This formation is of Ordovician origin (Paleozoic era 425 mya). Dolomite appears to have been laid during the early Ordovician period, while the sandstone was laid during the late part of the period (Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977)). Glaciation of St. Croix County occurred many times during the history of the earth, although the most recent glaciation, during the Pleistocene epoch (approximately 1 million to 10,000 years before present), is the most apparent. There were several stages of glacial advance, the most recent being the Wisconsinan stage. This was the result of the advance of the Superior Lobe and, from this, the Chippewa Lobe (Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin). St. Croix County appears to be part of the geographical province of the Western Upland. As noted by Paull et al (Paull, R.K., R.A. Paull (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA), "The Paleozoic rocks ... are the retreating erosional edges of marine sediments that once extended across the Northern Highland.... Late Cambrian seas washed over the Precambrian erosional surface to deposit more than 1,000 feet of sandstone, with minor amounts of interbedded dolomite." 4 The St. Croix River has its origin in the Northern Highlands and its resistant Precambrian rock. The loess deposits in St. Croix County appear to be the result of the westerly winds carrying fine textured soils easterly to the eastern bluffs of the river and beyond. The soils observed on site suggest that the area has been influenced by glaciation. Soils appear to be loess (fine- textured, wind blown soil), underlain by glacial till. The glacial till present as parent material in the subsoil of the site is most likely the result of deposit from the Superior Lobe (Chippewa Lobe) material. Loess, present as soil of the Ap horizon, may be the result of the influence of the wind -blown fines of the St Croix River floodplain. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE The parcel of land under investigation lays in the SW' /4 of the NW '/4 of Section 35, 29N, R17W, Hammond Township, St. Croix County. All land lays east of 190'" Street, and south of County Road J. The proposed subdivision it is composed of an approximately 1400 feet long hill laying approximately East -West. The hill is composed of soils which are primarily silt loam underlain by sandy clay loam glacial till. The hill appears to be a terminal moraine. The evaluated sites are located on the north facing portion of the land area and extend west and slightly north, following the hill slope. Initially there were 5 sites to review. Several more sites, located on the west portion of the hill were added, evaluated and designated suitable for A +0 mounds (see plot plan). Lots Z 6, 7, 8, 9 Locations of Proposed Mounds: Lot 2 - South portion of the proposed subdivision, bordering 190th Street Lot 6 — North - central portion of lot, approximately 630 feet east of 190'" Street Lot 7 — North - central portion of lot, approximately 800 feet east of 190'" Street Lot 8 — Central portion of lot, approximately 1000 feet east of 190" Street Lot 9 — South portion of lot, approximately 1200 feet east of 190'" Street Lot 2 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam — Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Typic Glossoboralfs Slope /Aspect as determined on site: 4% south - southwest. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Soils in the Ap horizon had moderate structure and many fine roots. Few fine wonn channels 5 were present in both the Ap and the Bt horizons. Soil colors in the Ap horizon were dark brown (IOYR 3/2). Soil density became apparent in the C horizon (glacial till parent material) at a depth of 21 inches (approximate). Redox features were faint in the bottom of the Ap horizon. This is designated as Ap -d in the soils report. Soils in this horizon (Ap -d) were platy in structure. E and Bt horizons displayed faint redox features. Redox features increased in intensity, size and frequency as depth increased. No redox features were observed in the root channels or in the worm channels of the Ap horizon. Soils remained moist throughout the profile. No saturation was observed. Lot 2 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (1 OYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 2. In the platy Ap -d and E horizons, faint redox features were present. Although platey, the grade was weak, indicating that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. No redox features were observed in the upper portion of the Bt horizon. Structure in this area of the profile was moderate blocky. In the lower portion of the Bt horizon, redox features were observed. Structure here was weak. The C horizon was composed of massive sandy clay loam with distinct to prominent redox features. This horizon is geomorphically disconnected from the horizons above (lithologic discontinuity) and represents a glacial till parent material. The soils above are probably of loess origin. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint in the Ap -d and E horizons, absent in the upper portion of the Bt horizon, and present again in the lower portion of the Bt horizon and in the 2C horizon below. This suggests that there are 2 factors contributing to the presence of redoximorphic features. In the upper layer, the appearance of redox features may be a reflection of poor farming.practices and poor soil stewardship. In the lower horizons, the redox features are a true indicatoeof seasonal saturation. Redox features in this lower horizon gradually increase in intensity and spatially. This suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS on lot 2. However, shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 92.40' (5 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed SAS). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. In addition, this area was not farmed, indicating poor drainage. This soil pit, located 142 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A +O mound displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 4% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. 6 Lot 6 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam — Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) — Typic Glossoboralfs (old designation for this soil series) Slope /Aspect as determined on site: 5% north. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 8 inches Depth to limiting factor: 6 inches Lot 6 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 2/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen for the 1" 6 inches. The lack of redoximorphic features in the first 6 inches of the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. However, the lower part of the Ap horizon (designated Ap -d) was platy and displayed faint to distinct redox features. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 6 at 0 — 6 inches. Structure in the Ap -d and E horizons was weakly platey. Water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically in this horizon. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were distinct in the bottom of the A horizon as well as in the Bt horizon and increased in intensity and number the further down the profile. There was a small and discontinuous E horizon on the pits on lot 6. BHP's 1 and 3 lacked the E horizon. Absence of an E Horizon in BHP's 1 and 3 may have been due to plowing. The distinct, continuous redoximorphic features and the increase as one descends in the profile suggests that there is a seasonally high water table on this lot. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions may exist into the Ap horizon and within 6 inches of the surface during the wetter times of the year. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. However, shallow very wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.10' (4.4 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed cell of the SAS). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. This soil pit, located 110 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A +0 mound displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area for a part of the year. Lot 7 Observations: 7 Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam — Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) — Typic Glossoboralfs (old designation for this soil series) Slope /Aspect as determined on site: 5% north - northwest Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9 inches Depth to limiting factor: 6 inches Lot 7 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield to a depth of 6 inches. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (1 OYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for the 3 pits observed on lot 7. Structure was weak in the platy Ap -d horizon from 6 to 9 inches. No E horizon was observed. The E horizon may have been eliminated as a result of plowing. No localized compaction (as a result of wheel traffic) was observed at the 0 to 6 inch depth. This may be a reflection of tillage. Evidence of compaction due to wheel traffic was evident in the platy Ap -d horizon. Density in the C horizon (parent material — glacial till) was observed, as was distinct to prominent redoximorphic features. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint to distinct in the Ap -d horizon, distinct in the Bt horizon, and prominent in the lower part of the Bt horizon and the massive 2C horizon. This suggests that there is a gradual increase in the amount of time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase as one descends down the profile. The presence of redox features in the Ap -d horizon and the continuous nature of the redox features descending down the profile suggest that seasonal saturation may be a factor on this site extending up to (and perhaps including) the Ap horizon. However, no redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. However, shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 93.80' (4.3 feet lower in the land topography than the proposed SAS cell). Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. This soil pit, located 100 feet downslope of the cell of the proposed A +0 mound, displayed redoximorphic features in the Ap horizon. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. 8 Lot 8 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam — Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) — Typic Glossoboralfs Slope /Aspect as determined on site: 6% north - northeast. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 8 inches Depth to limiting factor: 8 inches Lot 8 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (I OYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 8. No E Horizon was present in BHP's 2, 3, and 4, probably as a result of deep plowing. In BHP 1 an E horizon was present. This horizon had a characteristic platey structure. The structure was weak, allowing for water movement. Overall, structure in the A horizon for all the pits appeared to be unaffected by plowing, displaying good structure and observable macropores. There was also evidence of biological activity — worm channels and extensive roots in the Ap horizon. Field traffic (farm machinery) did not appear to have compacted soils or destroyed structure in the area of the proposed mound. No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS, in spite of the tendency for fine- textured soils that have been plowed to puddle. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were distinct, although few, in the horizon immediately below the Ap horizon. Intensity and number of redox features increased lower in the soil profile in each of the pits, suggesting a gradual increase in the amount time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: Shallow wet soils were observed inthe area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.50' on Lot 9. This pit was approximately 95 feet north of the 98.70 contour line. Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 6% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. Lot 9 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam — Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Freeon (FoB) — Typic Glossoboralfs (older designation — currently designated as Oxyaquic Glossoboralf). Slope /Aspect as determined on site: 5% north - northeast. 9 Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 7 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Lot 9 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were IOYR 2/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that this may be a wet area and that drainage is poor. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 9. Only the Backhoe pit designated as BHP 1 displayed an E horizon. In the E horizon platey structure was observed, although the platyness was weak. This suggests that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. Neither BHP2 nor BHP 3 showed an E horizon. This is most likely due to the degree and depth of plowing. No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint to distinct in the Ap and Bt horizon and increased in intensity and number the further down the profile. This suggests that there is a gradual increase in the amount time that water remains at a given depth. This, in turn, suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. Redox features were observed in the worm channels and the root channels in the Ap horizon. High Groundwater: Shallow wet soils were observed in the area of BHP 4, located at an elevation of 94.50' on Lot 9. This pit was approximately 95 feet north of the 98.70 contour line. Here, vegetation confirmed the wet soil conditions. Elevation, therefore, strongly influences the presence of seasonal saturation on this site. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound system is moderate. The 5% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the drainage area. Lots 1, 3, 4 (portion) a Locations of Proposed Mounds: Due to the unsuitability of lots 6, 7, 9 for mound systems, lot 1 and a portion of lot 3 and 4 has been designated for construction of mound systems. These mounds will service the residences to be located on lots 6, 7, 9. See accompanying plot plan. Lot 1 Observations: Soils as observed: silty loam underlain by sandy clay loam and sandy loam — Typic Glossoboralfs Soils as reported in the literature: Typic Glossoboralfs Slope /Aspect as determined on site: 4% to 4.5% north - northeast. Depth to bottom of Ap horizon: 9 -11 inches Depth to limiting factor: 7 inches Soils in the Ap horizon had moderate structure and many fine roots. Few fine worm channels 10 were present in both the Ap and the Bt horizons. Soil colors in the Ap horizon were dark brown (10YR 3/2). Soil density became apparent in the C horizon (glacial till parent material) at a depth of 18 inches (approximate). Redox features were faint in the bottom of the Ap horizon. This is designated as Ap -d in the soils report. Soils in this horizon (Ap -d) were platy in structure. Bt horizons displayed faint redox features. Redox features increased in intensity, size and frequency as depth increased. No redox features were observed in the root channels or in the worm channels of the Ap horizon. Soils remained moist throughout the profile. No saturation was observed. Lot 1 Discussion: Soil Structure: Soil colors as noted were 10YR 3/2 in the Ap horizon in the area of the proposed drainfield. This suggests that, at least in the Ap horizon, there is not an anoxic soil regimen. The lack of redoximorphic features and the light (1 OYR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon in this layer suggests that the soils are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. Structure in the Ap horizon was moderate for all the pits observed on lot 1 and proposed mounds associated with lot 1 (pits on lots 2, 3, 4). In the platy Ap -d horizon, faint redox features were present. Although platey, the grade was weak, indicating that water movement, would be impeded but not prevented, from moving vertically. No redox features were observed in the upper portion of the Bt horizon in several pits. Structure in this area of the profile was moderate blocky. In the lower portion of the Bt horizon, redox features were observed. Structure here was weak. The C horizon was composed of massive sandy clay loam with distinct to prominent redox features. This horizon is geomorphically disconnected from the horizons above (lithologic discontinuity) and represents a glacial till parent material. The soils above are probably of loess origin. Redoximorphic Features: Redoximorphic features were faint in the Ap -d horizon where present, absent in the upper portion of the Bt horizon, and present again in the lower portion of the Bt horizon and in the 2C horizon below. This suggests that there are 2 factors contributing to the presence of redoximorphic features. In the upper layer, the appearance of redox features may be a reflection of poor farming practices and poor soil stewardship. In the lower horizons, the redox features are a true indicator of seasonal saturation. Redox features in this lower horizon gradually increase in intensity and spatially. This suggests that anaerobic conditions gradually increase in the lower horizons. No redox features were observed in the worm channels or in the root channels in the Ap horizon. In profiles where structure remained moderate subangular blocky, redox features appeared gradually starting with faint features in the upper part of Bt horizon. This indicates that the Ap horizon is aerated and that anaerobic conditions begin gradually and increase as one descends down the soil profile. High Groundwater: No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS's on lot 1. Drainage: Drainage in the area of the proposed mound systems is moderate. The 4% slope and simple, uniformed slope suggests that there is adequate water movement away from the 11 drainage area. General Comments Relating to All Four Sites Drainage class: The soil survey manual notes that the drainage class for the soils on this site is "moderately well- drained." In agricultural terms, this is defined as "Soils that have periods of excessive wetness that adversely affect planting or harvesting operations or that reduce yields of some field crops." However, fields classified as moderately well drained are still capable of producing significant crop yields. This site has been used for corn production, indicating that the soils drain well enough for cultivation during a part of the year. No artificial drainage is used on this site. The areas established as mound sites all had grown corn in previous years. Non- agricultural definitions for drainage class deal with depth to high groundwater. The Soil. Science Manual from the University of Minnesota (Burgess Publishing) defines moderately well drained as depth to high groundwater of greater than 3 feet. It further states "No mottles in the upper B horizon, gray mottles in lower B." All designated mound sites were free of gray redox features within 4 inches of the Ap horizon. No standing water was observed in the backhoe pits. The soils described in the areas of the proposed A +0 mounds are located in the highest or close to the highest points on the land on the north and northeast portion of the proposed subdivision. Therefore, they are elevated above a permanent water table. It should be noted that the drainage class designation is based on slopes as well as depth to groundwater and textural classes. Thus, it is possible to have a site located on a high point on the landscape, have poor texture and structure, but have a "well- drained" classification if slopes are steep enough. Topographic Considerations: All proposed mound sites are located on either convex or straight slopes. None of the 6 A +0 sites (lot 2, 4 on lot 1, lot 8) are located on concave slopes or in waterways. Therefore, they are not located in areas where water can congregate. In addition, no sites are located in designated wetlands. Local Hydrology: As noted on the accompanying plot plans, the proposed dispersal sites have slopes ranging from 4% to 6 %. Local waterways exists on the property, although not in the area of the proposed A +0 mounds. The Rush River flows north -south and lays approximately 1 mile east of the proposed subdivision. The Kinnickinnic River is approximately 2 miles west of the site and flows approximately east -west. Subsurface regional flow (groundwater flow) is most likely west towards the St. Croix River. On -site observations agree with the site description as noted in the NRCS publication, Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin (USDA publication) and the soil data reported on the web site http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Soils are classified as Typic Glossoboralfs in the Soil Survey published in 1972. However, the NRCS has redesignated these soils as Oxyaquic Glossoboralfs. Typic Glossoboralfs have a boric temperature regime with elluvial and illuvial horizons which are saturated at some time during the year (as evidenced by the redoximorphic 12 features). Oxyaquic Glossoborlafs have a similar profile to the Typic soils, but are darker in the Ap horizon and have an Aquic moisture regime. The profile is described as being slightly acidic, suggesting that the profile is aged. The aging may be due to a greater than average amount of water movement through the soil. Specifically, soils in this area are mapped Freeon (FnB). According to the St Croix County Soil Survey book, native vegetation for this area was primarily white pine, red oak, and hard maple. According to the National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region), (copyright 1998, Chanticleer Press Inc., NY, NY), white pine grows in well- drained soils. Red Oak (also known as Scarlet Oak and Black Oak), grows in upland ridges and slopes. Maple grows in upland moist soils. All 3 types of trees therefore, appear to grow in well - drained or moderately well - drained soils. In relation to their tendency to grow in wetlands or histic soils, the 3 are classified as facultative plants (red, silver maple), or non - wetland plants (white pine). The publication notes that this soil type "consists of gently sloping and sloping, moderately well- drained soils." The publication goes on further to describe the lower part of the profile as becoming "saturated with water for long periods of time." Although not observed, significant redox features in the lower part of the subsoil indicate that this is a saturation does take place at some time during the year and that this condition persists for extended periods of time. Aquic Moisture Regime: "Keys to Soil Taxonomy" (6 Edition, 1994) notes that "The Aquic moisture regime signifies a reducing regime in a soil that is virtually free of dissolved oxygen because it is saturated by groundwater or by water of the capillary fringe." The text continues, "It is not known how long a soil must be saturated to have an Aquic moisture regime, but the duration must be at a least a few days because it is implicit in the concept that dissolved oxygen is virtually absent. Because dissolved oxygen is removed ... by respiration of micro- organisms, roots, and soil fauna, it is also implicit in the concept that the soil temperature is above biologic zero ... for some time while the soil is saturated." In another portion of the publication, Keys to Soil Taxonomy defines aquid conditions as: "those [soils] which currently experience continuous or periodic saturation and reduction.... Saturation is characterized by zero or positive pressure in the soil -water and can generally be determined by observing free water in an unlined auger hole." In neither auger holes nor shallow hand -dug pits was standing water observed in the epipedon. In addition, soil colors in the epipedon were not those characteristic of organic soils (IOYR 2/2). As noted previously, the placement of the A +0 mounds are on the highest or near the highest grounds on the site. Therefore, a high water table is not an issue on these sites. In addition, the mounds are sited on sloping sites, away from areas of water congregation. The presence of a capillary fringe, common where there is a large discrepancy between hydraulic conductivities between horizons (typically, coarse textured soil overlain by a much finer textured soil) is not found on these sites. Biological activity appears to be high as evidenced by the number of root channels and worm channels. Oxygen depletion appears not to be a phenomenon in the upper horizons as indicated 13 by the lack of reduced or oxidized areas in the channels. Tillage: Tillage can both aerate soil and cause anoxic conditions in the soil. In the short term, tillage will break up soil clumps, freeing trapped nutrients and exposing more of the soil to the air. This in turn, will cause more breakdown of organic material. In the long run, tilling the soil will break soil peds and destroy soil structure, thus destroying macropores that will contribute to aeration and water infiltration. In addition, the physical action of moving a heavy piece of machinery across the land, especially in wet weather, will compact fine- textured soil. The soils on site appear not to have been negatively impacted by tilling. On all proposed parcels, the soils of the epipedon were moderate structured, subangular blocky, indicating that tillage had not adversely affect the structure. As noted in the soil reports and in the body of this report, subsoils were present which had platy structure. In some cases, the platyness was due to natural causes (resulting in an E horizon). In some cases, the plantiness was found in the lower part of the A horizon (Ap -d), suggesting that this was the result of plowing (plowpan or plowsole). EXPLANATION FOR CURRENT SOIL CONDITIONS The proposed subdivision lays on a hill which lays in a general east -west direction. Slopes are approximately 5 to 8% throughout. Given the size, slope, aspects and underlying parent material, the subdivision appears to be part of a terminal moraine. During the many days that I have worked on this site, there has always been a moderate to strong wind from the southwest to the northeast. This is not unusual, since the majority of our weather pattern is the result of prevailing westerly winds with either moisture being carried from the south to the north (low pressure) or arctic winds (high pressure) coming from the northwest. These winds, as well as the relatively direct exposure of the south slope to the sun, may account for a more well developed soil profile on the south face of the moraine as opposed to the north face of the moraine. This, in turn, may account for more A horizon on the south slope relative to the north facing slope. Farm practices may also play a role in the soil development on this site. If a more southerly exposure has resulted in more soil development and an earlier warm -up of soil on the south facing slope, then these soils are less prone to "damage" from tillage at an earlier time in the spring than the soils on the north- facing slope. It is generally accepted that fine - textured soils are more prone to structural damage if plowed when wet or frozen. To prevent this, a different planting schedule would have to have been implemented on this site so that the south slope was plowed and seeded at least a week or 2 before the north face. Alternatively, the north facing slope should have been minimally tilled. These practices were not used on this site. As a result, soils on the north face are shallower with less structure than the soils on the south face. However, as the slope is directed more in a southerly or westerly direction, as in the case of lot 1, soils are more closely aligned with the soil forming factors and environmental conditions of the south facing slope. Thus lot 1 has soils which are more well - developed than lot 9. This being said, lot 1, as well as lot 8, display soil conditions that will require additional fill and 14 Y specialized geometry to accommodate the limitations in the soil. These sites have soils that have a compacted lower Ap horizon (Ap -d) which is weakly platey. This Ap -d horizon, unlike the soils further east, does not display distinct redoximorphic features. Some faint 7.5YR 5/6 redox features were observed, but these features were not continuous with redox features in the lower portion of the soil profile (horizons Btl and Bt2). The platiness may be related to the effects of farm machinery. Structure below the Ap -d horizon is moderate blocky with few redoximorphic features. As noted on the accompanying soil tests, it is proposed that lot 1 be used to support 4 mounds. These mounds will service lots 9, 7, 6, and 1. Lot 2 will have its own mound system, as will lot 8. It is not readily apparent why lot 8 has more well- developed soil than the soils found on lots on either side of it. Soils in" the area of lot 1 appear suitable for mound types of septic systems, albeit with A +0 soil horizons. As one moves east on the north portion of the slope, soils become less suitable to support mound systems. Soils on lots 6, 7, and 9 are unsuitable for any type of on -site septic system. Soils on lot 8 appear suitable for a mound system. All lots on the south slope of the proposed subdivision are suitable for mounds. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SOIL TESTS Where soil tests were done by me, Mr. David Steel and Mr. Leroy Jansky, differences may exist in the report of soil features. These differences may be related to the time of year when the tests were conducted (summer versus winter), time of day (morning versus afternoon), observer interpretation, angle of pit. In the case of the evaluations made by me versus Mr. Steel, the final evaluations made by me on this site were conducted in June. Soils were dry and free of frost. Lighting was good. Due to time constraints placed on Mr. Steel, many of his evaluations had to be conducted during the late fall when the angle of the sun was not ideal and the soils were cold. CONCLUSIONS A combination of cultural (i.e. farming practices) and environmental factors may have been at work in the creation of soil conditions found on this proposed subdivision. However the soils developed though, it is apparent that soils on lots 6, 7, and 9 are unsuitable for mound type of septic systems. No redoximorphic features were observed for at least 9 inches of the Ap horizon in any of the pits evaluated. The soils in this upper 9 inches appeared to be well aerated with the presence of roots and worm channels. Water movement therefore appears to take place in this upper layer. There does not appear to be a condition of ponding for any significant period of time in this upper layer. Redoximorphic concentrations appeared in the soils gradually, starting at approximately 9 inches (faint) and increasing in intensity (prominent) at lower depths. The faint redox concentrations may have been accompanied by redox depletions in the macropores although this was not observed. Slopes in all the proposed A +0 sites were gentle and either convex or straight. The A +0 mounds were not located on concave slopes. Water movement will be away from the mounds and will radiate outward. 15 PROPOSALS This soil tester feels that mound systems on these sites would adequately provide effluent treatment and dispersal as long as the follows design conditions are implemented: 1. The construction of the soil absorption systems must be in the area designated on the plot plans. 2. Areas lower in the landscape must not be used for soil absorption systems. 3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate less than or equal to 4.5 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and / or occupancy that can be serviced on the site. 4. The basal soil application rate must less than or equal to 0.3 gpsgft per day 5. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C -33 sand must be used under the laterals 6. Chisel plowing must be employed under the absorption area down to a depth of 12 inches 7. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches. 8. Slopes down -slope of the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3. This increases the toe absorption area. 9. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to divert water around the mounds, unless the mound is to located at — or near - the crest of the topographic high. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water from being trapped in the mounds. Alternatively, the mound can be constructed so that the "J" slope is wider in the center of the mound so that water is diverted to either side. If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact me at the above address and/or telephone number. Sincerely, Eli M. Gottfried Registered Sanitarian (80806), CST (221981), Licensed Designer (13 10) 16 ) ƒ ?� Attachme!! — Aerial ma for the French Home Inc development. Arrow points to approximate loc £on of mound o#1 « 2 6 7 8 9 17 I IJ �`. �: .. f / } ! i e _ �� � +`� .'` '.. ■ 41 A 14 f ri f r i Attachment 2. Topographic map showing the approximate locations of the sites. Note that none of the sites lay in a waterway or in an area of converging slopes. In addition, no designated wetlands are evident on the map. 18 7 r French Homes — Sample mound plan view with linear loading rate of 4.5 for a 4 bedroom residence Dimensions and Footprints for gravel, sand, and fill - + fill — X ft. sand Gravel Area U ft. W ft. I. Bed (Cell): Dimensions: 133 ft. x 4.5 ft. Sand: x = 8.82 ft. (based on 3:1 slope) w = 16.44 ft (based on 4:1 slope) u = 10.12 ft (based on 3:1 slope) Overall sand footprint = 170.23 ft x 29.26 ft Volume of sand: 623 cubic yards. THIS VOLUME IS FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES ONLY. Fill: J = 10.16 ft. I =18.82 ft. V = 13.12 ft. Overall fill footprint = 166.88 ft. x 32.98 ft. Installer: Sand amount is an estimate only. Please check this figure and compare it to similar sites that you are familiar with. 19 } 7 GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL Diversion Ditch — Sample C B JB ,radient to blend into — — — atural landscape S T W X Y B B B 5:1 slope all around ditch except stormwater outlet from ditch. Stormwater to be diverted around south end of mound soil absorption system. DIVERSION DITCH DETAIL NOTE THAT THIS DIAGRAM REPRESENTS %2 OF THE DRAINAGE DITCH A= 1 ft. B=5 ft. C =80 ft. Grade Elevations: Trench Elevations: S= 104.90 ft. S = 103.06, A = 1.0 ft, B = 13.75 ft, D =1.84 ft. T = 104.90 ft. T = 103.23 ft. W = 104.90 ft. W = 103.40 ft. X = 104.90 ft. X = 103.56 ft. Y = 104.90 ft. Y = 103.73 ft. Z = 104.90 ft. Z = 103.90 ft., A = ].Oft., B = 5.0 ft, D = 1.0 ft. The bottom of the trench should be smoothed so that water flows evenly from the center to the end. Total drop from the center of the diversion ditch to the end is 10 inches. Drop is 1/8" per ft. 20 REFERENCES 1. Brown, B.A. (1988) Bedrock Geology of Wisconsin University of Wisconsin— Extension, Madison Wisconsin. 2. Keys to Soil Taxonomy (1994) 6` Edition. Soil Survey Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pocahontas Press, Inc. Blacksburg, Virginia. 3. Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin 4. Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan Kendall /Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 5. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region): (1998) Chanticleer Press Inc., NY, NY 6. Soil survey of St Croix County (1978). United States Dept of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Research Division of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin. 7. Soil Survey Staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture (1994) Keys to Soil Taxonomy Sixth Edition, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Pocahontas Press Inc., Blacksburg, Virginia. I I 21 I %uriiitll tts ilVl. Y� SAFETY AND I31J11-DING'S rtIVIS101+ Integrated services Bureau 13 E20 Spruce Street INSPECTION REPORT Chippewa Falls WI 54729 CO n0 www.commerce.wi,gov /sb Department of commerce (715) 726 -2544 Date of Inspection: June 7, 2006 Plumber Name and Address: .Project Name: French NA Use: Residential Legal Description: SW, NW, 35, 29, 17W Site Number: 713333 Subdivision: Croix Hills RECEtV ifie Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Hammond Ii M. Gottfried, CST 42258 County: St. Croix O Box 1645 [4 JUL 241006 au Claire, WI 54702 -1645 Plan Transaction Number: 12753 Sanitary Permit Number: NA ST. CROIXCOtOIfter ame and Address: roy French Wastewater Flow: 300 -600 gpd PO Box 350 Persons Present: Owner, E. Gottfried, D. Roberts, WI 54023 Steel, R. Yarrington An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and /or subsoil. In -situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. Soil data verified is as follows: BHP-4 00 -07" _ 10YR 3/2 sil __2csbj�,_Mfr, aw.__.__ 07 -11" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2msbk parting to pl, mfr, as, w/ f1 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 11 -19" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2msbk, mfr, cw, w/ c3d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 19 -24" 7.5YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk, mfr w /c3d 7.5YR 5/6 and 10YR 5/3 rmfs. BHP -1 00 -05" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2msbk, mfr, aw. 05 -09" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2csbk, mfr, as, w/ f1 d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09 -12" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2mpl, mfr, cw, w/ c2f 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 12 -16" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2msbk, mfr w/. c2f 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. BHP -1A 00 -08" 10YR 3/3 sil, 2csbk, mfr, cw. 08 -09" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2fpl, mfr, as, w/ f1 d 5YR 4/6 rmfs. 09 -13" 10YR 4/2 sil, 2mpl, mfr, cw, w/ c2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 13 -18" 10YR 4%3 sil, 2m -cpl, mfr, cw, w/ f2d 10YR 5/3 and 5/6 rmfs. 18 -24" 10YR 4/3 sil, 2msbk, mfr w/. f2d 10YR 5/3 and 516 rmfs. BHP at intersection of Lots 1. 2, and 3 xo,,.) to N r3� /Z 15 Similar to BHP-4 c3d Fe conc in the lower A horizon. Five to six inches of A horizon w/o rmfs. Subsoil below the A horizon has has rmfs. I Page 2 of 2 June 7, 2006 Troy French site Lot 8 On lot 8 at a location approximately midpoint along the proposed system contour and 15 ft up slope conditions were noted to be acceptable to a depth of 15 inches (0 -8" 10YR 3/3 sil, 8 -15" 7.5YR 4/4 grscl with no rmfs). Lot 9 On lot 9, on the far west end of the proposed system contour the upper 7 inches of the A horizon had no rmfs but the lower 3 inches did have rmfs as Fe concentrations. The subsoil was a 10YR 4/4 scl with f2f 10YR 5/6 rmfs. The east side of lot 8 might be used for part of the system for lot 9. Lots 10, 12. 14, and 16 -�ad A% a A-. Soil conditions on the north side of the proposed subdivision were.also reviewed, although this area is not part of the interpretative determination for lots 1 -9. The pits,evaluated all had greater than A +4 conditions. Briefly, lot 10 had A +6 ", lot 12 had A +16 ", lot 14 had A+ 11 ", and lot 16 had A +10 ". General The use of a common off lot (lot 1) area for installation of a common mound or separate mounds would be acceptable with county approval (for a common system). Other sites appear acceptable for long and narrow mounds with appropriate depths of sand fill. Final landscaping should be as per the recommendations of the certified soil tester so that surface and near surface groundwater water does not interfere with proper mound operation. Mound locations on 16ts 8 and 9 need to be worked out carefully since the east part of lot 9 is not suitable for a mound. Soil application rates for those sites with A +0 conditions should be 0.2 gpd /ft^2 and linear loading rates should be no more than 4.5 gpd /ft. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. sk L oyG7 y, - vat -- - cc: ounty ❑ Prumlier Ljansky@ ommerce.state.wi:us E -mail CST ❑ Owner 715/726 -2544 Voice 715/726 -2549 Fax ❑ Other � f Nisconsin pepartmenj of Commerce SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION Page Of )ivision of Safety.and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 % x I I inches in size. Plan must include, but ` County St. Croix of limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and percent slope, scale or imensions, north arrow, and location and distance to the nearest road. a r ` Parcel ID # \PPLICANT INFORMATION - Please print all information C Reviewed By: / Date: ersonal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04(I)(m)). 'roperty owner: Property location 'roy French - French Homes Gov't lot: SW 1/4 NW 1/4 S35 T29 N, R17© 'roperty owner's mailing address: Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# '.O. Box 350 1L NA Croix Hills :ity / State / Zip Code Phone number: city Village FT Nearest Road toberts / WI/ 54023 -0350 715 -718 -2929 Hammond I i 190` St. New Construction Use ❑ Residential/Number of bedrooms 31.5 Addition to existing building: NA 3 Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - describe - NA .ode Design Flow Rate: 4,725 gallons/day %rent Material: Glacial Till - ground morraine leneral Comments and Recommendations: Soils are somewhat poorly drained Alfisols underlain by dense glacial till. This is an A +0 mound site. Redox eatures are the result of perching above and within the dense glacial till. Taxonomic classification: Aquic Glossoboralf SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT loring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD /FT' ]HP Eff#] Eff#2 1 Ap 0-6 l OYR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw INA 0.6 0.8 iround Ap -d 6-11 IOYR 2/2 NA sil Impl mfr aw 0.4 0.6 Iev 00 Bt 11 -15 1OYR 4/4 mId 7.5YR 5/8 sic] Imsbk mfr cw 0.2 0.3 92.32 )epth to 2C 15 -40 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive imiting actor - 1. 0 temarks: Bt horizon - very dense loring # Ap 0 l OYR 3/2 NA sil 2fgr mfr aw 2vf 0.6 0.8 HP Ap - d 7 1 OYR 3/2 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 sil 1 mpl mfr aw 1 of 0.4 0.6 Tj Btl 9 -1 1 10YR 4/4 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw lvf 0.6 0.8 ;round ilev (ft.) Bt2 1 I -13 1 OYR 4/4 fl d 7.5YR 5/8 sic] Impl mfr cw 1 of 0.4 0.6 97.80 )epth to 2C 13 - 35 7.5YR 4/4 m2d 7.5YR 5/6 gr scl massive imiting Ador- n ' Remarks: Bt - small amount of clay :ST Name: Eli M. Gottfried, Gottfried Environmental Signature: tO_ Tel. No. 715 - 833 -1400 kddress: 124 -1/2 Graham Ave. Eau Claire, WI. 54701 Date: 31 May 2006; 15 June 2006 CST # 221981 SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT t . Property owner . French, Troy Parcel ID# lot 1 Y Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FT2 4 BHP r j Eff# 1 Eff#2 Ap 0-7 10YR 3/2 NA A 2mgr mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap -d 7-9 9 IOYR 3/2 fl 7.5Y Elev (ft.) R 5/6 sil 1 mpl mfr cw l vf 0.4 0.6 95.80 Btl 9-12 7.5YR 4/4 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 sil Imsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 Depth to Bt2 12 -18 7.5YR 4/4 m2d 7.5YR 5/6 sicl lmsbk mfr limiting aw NA 0.2 0.3 factor- in. 2C 18 -38 7.5YR 4/4 C2d 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive 0 Remarks: Btl - clay bridging Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FTZ BHP4 Efl#1 Eff#2 LQfi� Ap 0-7 1 OYR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr as lvf 0.6 0.8 Ground AP 7-11 IOYR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sil impl mfr as lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev (ft.) 99.05 Btl 11 -18 IOYR 4/4 fl d 7.5YR 5/6 sil 2msbk mfr cw NA 0.6 0.8 Depth to Bt2 18 -20 7.5YR 4/4 mId7.5YR 5/8 sicl Imsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 limiting factor- in 2C 20 -35 7.5YR 4/4 C2d 7.5YR 5/8 SO massive 0 Remarks:Bt horizon - Mn and clay bridging Boring # Ap 0-7 1 O.YR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr as l vf 0.6 0.8 BHPS �_d 7 _ 9 lOYR 3/2 fld 7.SYR 5/6 sil lm I in P aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Btl 9-12 7.5YR 4/4 NA A 2msbk mfr gw lvf 0.4 0.6 Elev (ft.) 99.80 Bt2 12 -17 7.5YR 4/4 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sicl lmsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 Depth to 2C 17 -28 7.5YR 4/6 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive limiting factor- in. 0 Remarks: This pit is located on lot 2; Btl horizon has clay bridging Boring # Ap 0-7 1OYR 2/2 NA sil lmsbk mfr aw 2vf 0.4 0.6 Prt 6 Ap -d 7-12 10YR 2/2 NA sil lmpl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Bt 12 -15 IOYR 4/4 mId 7.5YR 5/8 sic] Imsbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 Elev (ft.) 2C 15 -25 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive 93.80 Depth to imiting actor- in. 0 Hand dug, shallow pit; Btl horizon has clay bridging Boring # Ap 0-7 1 OYR 2/2 NA A 1 msbk mfr aw 2vf 0.4 0.6 Pit 7 Ap -d 7-12 10YR 2/2 NA sit tmpl mfr aw lvf 0.4 0.6 Ground Bt 12 -18 IOYR 4/4 mld 7.5YR 5/8 Sid lmsbk mfr cw NA 0.2 0.3 El 80 9 3.80 2C 18 -22 7.5YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 5/8 gr scl massive 9 Depth to limiting factor- in. 0 hand boring w/ 5" auger and spade; Ap -d = plow pan Boring # Ap 0-8 10YR 3/2 NA sit 2msbk mfr as 1 of 0.6 0.8 Pit 8 Ap -d 8-10 IOYR 3/2 ft 7.5YR 5/6 sit lmpl mfr aw Ivf 0.4 0.6 Ground Btl 10-13 7.5YR 4/4 NA sit 2msbk mfr gw Ivf 0.4 0.6 Elev (ft.) Bt2 13 -17 7.5YR 4/4 fld 7.5YR 5/6 sicl lmsbk mfr gw NA 0.2 0.3 99.80 Depth to 2C 17 -30 7.5YR 4/6 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 scl massive limiting factor - in. 0 BHP 8 is located on lot 4; clay coats in Btl horizon; very dense in 2C 0.2 mi. to CTH J C '\ n =1 + it O CID Pb z w �e qFq w I3 In Wq c a w a g I � V . 1 1 A 11 m03 it r r . yl �� i Vii/ � � %� `►. [.7 I 'I ✓ . N I � j l ' W -u 0 m 1 w \ If \ ;^ ° 0 �, 3 ¢ x of RLw N x t 1 �` •G� \ b .. v V N 3 80 3E)Vd AN3 a3IdJ11O9 T8£T££89TLT £0:171 900Z/6Z/90 . O EvALJ@FM5Wk&0RT P 1 of #1315 Department of Commerce ice with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. C e 9 Division of Safety and Buildings +°`��` t r Steel's Soil Service, Inc. �.., b�Ff. i_n jCunty Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8% x 11 inch s in size. Plan must St. Croix include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference po t (Bl {dip " percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location nd disc' a c'.'e ttS near s oad. cel I.D. Please print all info atto Revi d By D Personal information you provide may be used for �n.ry pu (Privacy , s. 15.0 ate (m)). Z' 6 b Property Owner Apperty Lo tion French Homes, Inc. G S !4, NW1 /4, S35, T29N, R17W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. ame r CS Ct P.O. Box 350 na Croix Hills P r C; 0— r%," 1 4T 1 City State Zip Code Phon Numbe City [] Village M Town Nearest R Roberts WI 54023 715 - 718 - 2929 Hammond 190Th New Construction Use: ❑ Residential / Number of bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 0 ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: na Parent material Silty sediment and underlying reddish sandy loam till Flood plain elevation, if applicable na ft. General comments Mound Design, system elevation 102.63ft based on contour line elevation 1 00.8011 . No deviation from site and recommendations: area with out first contacting soil tes e — f r due to poor soil conditions. ❑ i, Boring # ❑ Boring � pit Ground surface elev. 100.80 ft. Depth to limiting factor 1$ v in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistenme Boundary Roots GPD/ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 `Ef 1 0 -9 10yr3 /2 none sil 2msbk mfr CS 1vf .6 .8 2 9 -18 10yr4 /4 none sicl 2msbk mfr cs na .4 .6 3 18-40 10yr5/8 c2d 7.5yr5/6 scl om mfr na na .0 .0 F21 Boring # [:]Boring / ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. 100.80 ft. Depth to limiting factor 14 ✓ in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft= in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 •EM2 1 0 -7 10yr3 /2 none Sil 2msbk mfr cs if .6 .8 2 7 -14 10yr4/4 none sic! 2msbk mfr gw 1vf .4 .6 3 14-48 10yr4/4 c2d 7.5yr5/6 Sc 2cskb mfr na na .0 .0 Effluent #1 = BOD 30 < 220 mg/L and,TSS >30 < 150 mg/L Efflu = BOD <_30 mg /L and TSS <_30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) S' nature: CST Number David J. Steel ' 248956 Address Steel's Soil Service, Inc. '� Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 994 200th St. Baldwin, WI 54002 12!612005 715 - 760 -0347 SBD -8330 (R07 /00) t r v L r.,• i yl (( v —JAI c.o vv t ' p 8 o z / ,00 7 z� I I 1 //� o -v in a O� / m r / 0) O I ` o // e z o f cn o ,00 M „OS x .00 N j n / I / ' / • TI I / ..s / o t , O)a w « M (A oo le rm .1e 0 m CD A LA Ln 100, z OD ' •� 170 0) Frl / C N M / �`\ 1 f Z (� �\ / r'\ (h I L_ K) - i ��\ \\ i , W • ! 1 t � I I � ACS _ � 9 1 a IM ' tip W i c to I c- 1 °v° 1 I I ! I II I I I 1 I I I a Do ,£ •0L M I�,LZt+.£ 1--- r _ AWN , ZO.41.0 f / z / � E/ / r , . °° / 0 O / / r / 1 °° 0a / i 0 I // •� rn � � � � _ i 06/28/05 TUE 08:06 FAX 715 386 4686 2002 ST. CROIX COUNTY SEPTIC TANK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION FORM Owner /Buyer I 75 � 5' ,rJ� Mailing Address � s � Property Address (Verification required from Planning Department for new construction.) n O _a V /a? - 00(c) <5 City /State d�/.f, [ /V�' Parcel Identification Number O LEGAL DESCRIPTION Property Location 5 � ' /. , N(.� '/. , Sec. 35 T N R W, Town of Subdivision 7L , Lot # < Certified Survey Map # , Volume , Page # Warranty Deed # �0�7 s `� 7 , Volume �, Page # Spec house ! I yes Kno Lot lines identifiablev-)W�s i I no SYSTEM MAINTENANCE improper use and maintenance of your septic system could result in its premature failure to handle wastes. Proper maintenance consists of pumping out the septic tank every three years of sooner, if needed by a licensed pumper. What you put into the system can affect the function of the septic tank as a treatment stage in the waste disposal system. The property owner agrees to submit to St. Croix County Zoning Department a certification form, signed by the owner and by a master plumber, Journeyman plumber, restricted plumber or a licensed pumper verifying that (1) the on -site wastewater disposal system is in proper operating condition and/or (2) after inspection and pumping (if necessary), the septic tank is less than 113 full of sludge. Uwe, the undersigned have read the above requirements and agree to maintain the private sewage disposal system with the standards set forth, herein, as sec by the Department of Commerce and the Department of Natural Resources, State of Wisconsin. Certification stating that your septic system has been maintained must be completed and returned to the St. Croix County Zoning Department w' . 30 days of the three year expiration date. e 0 J— — qF SIGNATURE F APPLICANT OWNER CERTIFICATION ( /we certify that ail stacetctents on this form are true to the best of my /our knowledge. 1 /we am/are the owner(s) of the property dcs edby virtue of a w d ceorded in Register of Deeds Office. r SIGNATURE OF APPLIC ANT DATE An y m inforation that is misrepresented may result in the sanitary permit being revoked by the Zoning Department. ' *•"" trrsss Include with this application a stamped warranty deed from the Register of Deeds Office and a copy of the certified survey map if reference is made in the warranty deed. w: ,�� 8 0 Tx: 40104 8 61 STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN FORM 1 - 2000 I 927597 Document Number WARRANTY DEED BETH PABST REGISTER OF DEEDS THIS DEED, made between The River Bank, Grantor, and Matthew G. ST. CROIX CO., WI Vandeberg and Nicole J. Vandeberg, husband and wife survivorship RECEIVED FOR RECORD marital property, Grantee. 11/24/2010 2:S7 PM Grantor, for a valuable consideration, conveys to Grantee the following EXEMPT *: N/A described real estate in St. Croix County, State of Wisconsin (the REC FEE: 30.00 "Property"): TRANS FEE: 96.00 PAGES: 1 Lots 12 and 13, Croix Hills First Addition in the Town of Hammond, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Recording Area Name and Return Address: St. Croix County Abstract and Title Co. Inc. 219 S. Knowles Ave. New Richmond, WI 54017 SFA8049 Together with all appurtenant rights, title and interests. Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 018 - 2017 -12 -000 018 - 2017 -13 -000 This is not homestead property. Grantor warrants that the title to the Property is good, indefeasible in fee simple and free and clear of encumbrances except easements, covenants, and conditions of record. Dated this :�, day of November, 2010 The River Bank . /.N./ /FYI / /I'1 /� y Jeanine Sandberg AUTHENTICATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT Signature(s) STATE OF WISCONSIN ) COUNTY (' . — ) ss. authenticated this Personally came before me this day of November, 2010 the above named The River Bank by Jeanine Sandberg, * Finance and Operations Officer, to me known to be the person(s) TITLE: MEMBER STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the (If not, same. authorized by § 706.06, Wis. Slats.) V7��' ""�' K �) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY Notary P c State f Wisconsin Robert L. Loberg My commissio ermanent. (If not, state expiration date: Loberg Law Office C t — \`k — \ ) (Signatures may be authenticated or acknowledged. Both are not necessary.) *Names of persons signing in any capacity must be typed or printed below their signature QQ,GGV JOF/&%9, WARRANTY DEED STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN NOTARY ORM No. 1 -2000 * PUBLIC a I PA 9 �FOF W1SG 1 of 1 Parcel #: 018 - 20171 -000 12/14/2010 10:19 AM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel #: 35.29.17.1133 018 - TOWN OF HAMMOND Current ❑X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units 10/27/2006 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co -Owner O - RIVERBANK RIVERBANK 304 CASCADE ST OSCEOLA WI 54020 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): ' = Primary Type Dist # Description ' 1910 66TH AVE SC 0231 SCH D BALDWIN - WDVILLE SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 1.660 Plat: 11-014-CROIX HILLS 1STADDN 018 -06 LOTS 9/15 SEC 35 T29N R1 7W PT SW NW FKA OL 2 CROIX Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 012 HILLS NKA CROIX HILLS 1ST ADDN ('06) LOT 12 (1.660AC) Tract(s): (Sec- Twn -Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4) 35- 29N -17W SW NW Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol /Page Type 02/25/2010 912352 DEED 10/27/2006 837504 PLAT 08/15/2006 832265 11/010 PLAT 01/17/2006 816514 WD more... 2010 SUMMARY Bill #: Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 87772 Use Value Assessment Valuations: Last Changed: 06/11/2009 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason AGRICULTURAL G4 1.660 300 0 300 NO Totals for 2010: General Property 1.660 300 0 300 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2009: General Property 1.660 300 0 300 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch #: Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 COUNTY PLAT OF: CROIX KILLS 8 3750 SttxOTXC0. IST ADDITION W6yE e�Aaa w 's'sL� NW CORNIER, SEC. 35a LOCATED IN PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF FOUND BERNT$EN NAIL) a SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 17 WEST, TOWN OF HAMMOND, ST. CROIA COUNTY, WISCONSIN; j WW BEING OUTLOT 2 OF CROIA HILLS. N �0 0 T2 � + NO.20 PC�5_I)7 xla N , NORTH LINE OF N SW 1/4 - NW 1/4 LOCATION MAP: N 997975' E ILA (S8936'44 - E) 1 le 11 ()2.1z') N 89'28'25" E 1293.13' i (NOT TO SCALE) Mw• — — 1 271.75' - z 684.34' SECTION 7.04' L ON 35, T29N, R17W, 1 1 ---- C.TA 'f 1 i IOO — PLAr I 1 LOT 15 NI'W i LOT 10 11� NWE- 1B75sD I '' LOCATION N 1 85109 S.F. �� �S6oS� 153636 S.F. M 0° H 1.95 Ac. f Sd•4' 3.53 Ac. 0 a 6 I� � IN sHEEt g I m 06'48'36' W 63.97' 0 Itn 33' 33' l IN 06'48'36' W 1 IO i 1 10 1 i 1 159984 S.F. 11.92' -- 18 - i - - - .11.86' ..- -- - - - - p LOT 9 to Ic Z ; 1 344.68' - - 351.44' _ . z� 1 IE lz 60MA 0 1 i I r_ - -- N 8824'09' E 1 696.12 o I 3.67 Ac. 10 K "0 N 88'24'09" E' 384.81 o I� I I 1 10 ° Cr I1.� a $ 2oo.e3' — l 96— — I I. LOT 11 J 1 i p LBO = 1077.90 i 1 m I; � o o 1 1 I (P 1 164.18' - 220.63' I 102007 S.F. n I I0 1 N I" �x11'3�'f ; 1 ,, LOT 121 I 2.34 Ac. N1 I 1 1 I (N DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOTE: � E W 1 �� ss A F 1 � 0 LOT 13 1 1 j 1 ND a1EA M ICYDWf U 94x2 W NIYANC IMCI FAW ;. i ' 2 Vi p "'11 wTE V M a OMLCR PLANA +' N ; LOT 14 I p NI 1n — . INS mFS � B 6 M oNr on to Kam ttm i 1 N i 7183 S.F. � a- 73290 S.F. W 1 1 o - MUM ALMK FIX M aaMwN m MW IN 1 � � I I = I 60.83' o ®34184 NW wWaMro RMI A NY POND EASONNTS. WATER DAMAGE WORTS, WATER 1 . 1.68 Ac. n 1 1 z / �-- :- --- ---- __ -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- - a x�Nman n RIMA Matenam M wss mmws .65:Ac m w .I - - [4wpl awtMFM GENERAL NOTICE STATEMENT: Io 110 `'` x ; S 89'42'58' W 468.67' 66TH STREET — OWN PHMwaxlONMW lAgW00TOSrA 1 u Z `G UNIX a NOW u6 ALIS a MUM RL i r 1 � l �1 aluws rNU Aar ffi M61S w PAwa mom OR4 aU DR R AwaFN MW ANESauAaEarARrw2a. wworMn2MNNaRaAawEMNNw4awMWn4n ; ro-� I m 1 / Oti / / ,I aIE d S 8925'10" W . I I / 101• ti9 / 1 IQLL I L4L9 S671f%'W UTILITY EASEMENTS: I �t:- yti , / / ro a� a MPa[Mwowus MEroanuw sa wA H 1 60.00' 1 / �A9� / LQL6 y84 gL3 1 EASEMENT waM SET N E UWa1 WAAD DN0.Aw MY 4MWY SING. w wSwNl W90N I — b / am aWTauN[as6a:rMt xtaWAWMa a ARxWY I - 5 1, Sr MARMRWANAWNAUOF ICwN 2aFYWSEdx N 00'34'50" W 66 SIAIM MOW AMW 4 lEall TO IRE FM N USE I OF I IWAA MR NRA"ft ulna MIN A Morro NOTES: I 0, q S M5 MOO "0 .5D ONES DAM NNIDI 146.82' "• W i � .T D&M FM R-D-W -- WGE slaac • 125 1 f r — — � LEGEND: YE4 SEW • 15 — ROADWAY SE1BA(Ns Mt BNDRA3 w GE ai51M¢RO x PwMYtt ww NNIIA6E mm ONMWAY LOCATION FASOENw 91NL NAW A mIF6N BNwN aaMN w waDW ( I 3Q L atmmWARwaNlMwr Its AAw rM faf ABD1E NA WM LITER ------ ___ -, 11' unun FA9EMENi EWE Hal MATER ElEYA1Na 1 33' 33' -- AM,DILY!81 -- DRAINAGE EA93WNI HK IDNESf aDl04G dgwlC AL5m COWTY MGWMNIYT R.A. REDCRDFD As S, (FOOM AS NOTED) Yro[OWtE W FOUND 1' 00 PIPE W 1/4 CORNER, SEC R1D 35 // W TO 3/4' BY 1a' IRON PIN (FORM 2 318'0.D. WON PIPE) / Y 0 FOX 11/4' BY If IRON PR SET 3 /1 Ir 0 PW 1 wt. lsa Las . SW[: 1 ® AT All OW LOT CON6RS D s On 4 Do 160 AL CURVE DATA TABLE; DE 10 nA A D IRIF a of 4 1 /! SA441D TO FA 4'Sp c MAMA AApI$ IfO ARC maw WN DFL1A MN[ CIaAD IEMw atf alam wwCAM fAN'ON N TMNRIII Wl Cl I 431m 2DLw I T6S4u 21.4 s w'1Ssf or s aF47W W s 6F4w9' W C2 361.0) 170.42 263ne Ism s %aYw' W s 674 -5+ w S.1a W NAM aC OF WU HWPNIEY FI0ow 9EET 1 OF 2